How Does Philip Sidney Defend Poetry in His Essay "Apology For Poetry"?

How does Philip Sidney defend poetry in his
essay “Apology for Poetry”?

Posted on December 1, 2013 by Khanindra Dutta
Philip Sidney defends poetry in his essay “Apology for Poetry” from the accusations made
by Stephen Gosson in his “School of Abuse” dedicated to him. There, Gosson makes some
objections against poetry. Sidney replies to the objections made by Gosson very
emphatically, defending poetry in his essay. Sidney does this in a very logical and scholarly
way.
The major objections against poetry are: (a) “that there being many other more fruitful
knowledges, a man might better spend his time in them then in this”; (b) that it is the mother
of lies; (c) that it is the nurse of abuse; infecting us with many pestilent desires; and (d) that
Plato had rightly banised poets from his ideal republic.
Sidney’s replies to these objections:
(a) Defending poetry against the first charge, he says that man can’t employ his time more
usefully than in poetry. He says that “no learning is so good as that teacheth and moveth to
virtue, and that none can both teach virtue, and thereto as much as poetry”.
(b) His answer to the second objection that poets are liers is that of all writers under the sun
the poet is the least lier. The poet creates something by emotion or imagination against
which no charge of lying can be brought. The astronomer, the geometrician, the historian
and others, all make false statements. But poet “nothing affirms, and therefore never lieth”,
his end being “to tell not what is or what is not, but what should or should not be”. The
question of truth or falsehood would arise only when a person insists on telling a fact. The
poet does not present fact but fiction embodying truth of an ideal kind.
(c) The third objection against poetry that it is the nurse of abuse, “infecting us with many
pestilent desires or wits” may be partly justified, but for this a particular poet may be blamed
but not poetry. To this charge, Sidney replies that poetry does not abuse man’s wit but it is
man’s wit that abuses poetry. All arts and sciences misused had evil effects, but that did not
mean that they were less valuable when rightly employed. Abuse of poetry, according to
Sidney, is not the problem of poetry but of the poet.
(d) The fourth objection that Plato had rightly banished the poets from his ideal republic is
also not tenable because Plato sought to banish the amoral poets of his time, and not
poetry itself. Plato himself believed that poetry is divinely inspired. In “Ion”, Plato gives high
and rightly divine commendation to poetry. His description of the poet as “a light-winged and
sacred thing” reveals his attitude to poetry. Sidney concludes, “So as Plato banishing the
abuse, not the ‘Thing’, not banishing it, but giving due honour unto it, shall be our patron
and not adversary”.
In this way, Sidney very strongly defends poetry against the accusations made by Stephen
Gosson on poetry.
Superiority of poetry over history and philosophy:
In the promotion of virtue, both philosophy and history play their parts. Philosophy deals
with its theoritical aspects and teaches virtue by precepts. History teaches practical virtue
by drawing concrete examples from life. But poetry gives both practical and precepts
examples. Philosophy, being based on abstractions, is “heard of utterance and mystery to
be conceived.” It cannot be a proper guide for youth. On the other hand, the historian is tied
to empirical facts that his example drags no necessary consequence. Poetry gives perfect
pictures of virtue which are far more effective than the mere definitions of philosophy. It also
gives imaginary examples which are more instructive than the real examples of history. The
reward of virtue and the punishment of vice is more clearly shown in poetry than in history.
Poetry is superior to philosophy in the sense that it has the power to move and to give
incentive for virtuous action. It presents moral lessons in a very attractive manner. Things
which in themselves are horrible as cruel battles, monsters are made delightful in poetic
imitation. Poet is therefore the monarch of all knowledge. “For he doth(does) not only show
the way but giveth(gives) so sweet a prospect into the way as will entice any man to enter
into it.”
The poet does not begin with obscure definitions which load the memory with doubtfulness,
“but he cometh(comes) to you with words set in delightful proportion, either accompanied
with or prepared for the well-enchanting skill of music and with a tale for suit he cometh unto
you, with a tale which holdeth(holds) children from play and old man from the chimney
corner. And pretending no more, doth intend the winning of the mind from wickedness to
virtue.”

How Does Philip Sidney Defend Poetry in His Essay "Apology For Poetry"?

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How Does Philip Sidney Defend Poetry in His Essay "Apology For Poetry"?

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

How Does Philip Sidney Defend Poetry in His Essay "Apology For Poetry"?

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How does Philip Sidney defend poetry in his

essay “Apology for Poetry”?

Sidney’s replies to these objections:

Superiority of poetry over history and philosophy:

You might also like