Chapter 3 - Natural Law

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CHAPTER 3 - NATURAL LAW

1. Recognize how Thomas Aquinas made use of Ancient Greeks concepts to provide
a rational grounding to an ethical theory based on the Christian faith

St. Thomas Aquinas had come up with five ways to prove the existence of God.
The first four of which are called the Cosmological arguments and the fifth is called the
Teleological arguments. They are as follows:

1. Argument from Motion


2. Argument from Causation
3. Argument from Contingency
4. Argument from Degrees
5. Teleological Argument or Intelligent Design

Aquinas' five arguments for proving the existence of God relate to Aristotles'
theory of causes since Aquinas' ideas were heavily influenced by Aristotle's views.
Aristotle's account of God as the First Mover (who was the sole cause of the movement
of everything) provided a premise for Aquinas' Teleological arguments, especially the
Argument for Motion and Argument for Causation.

2. Identify the natural law in distinction from, but also in relation to the other types of
law mentioned by Aquinas: eternal law, human law, divine law

Aquinas distinguishes four kinds of law: (1) eternal law; (2) natural law; (3)
human law; and (4) divine law.
By “Eternal Law” Aquinas means God’s rational purpose and plan for all things,
and because the Eternal Law is part of God’s mind then it has always, and will always,
exist. But the Eternal Law is not simply something that God decided at some point to
write.
By Natural Law, Aquinas thinks that the answer is reasonable and that it is this
that makes us distinct from rats and rocks. What is right for me and you as humans are
to act according to reason. If we act according to reason then we are partaking in the
Natural Law.

Human laws are not generated by our reason but rather they are imposed by
governments, groups, clubs, societies, etc.

Divine law is concerned with those standards that must be satisfied by a human
being to achieve eternal salvation. One cannot discover divine law by natural reason
alone; the precepts of divine law are disclosed only through divine revelation.

3. Apply the precepts of the natural law to contemporary moral concerns


The natural law is comprised of those precepts of the eternal law that govern the
behavior of beings possessing reason and free will. The first primary precept is that good
is to be pursued and done and evil avoided. He thinks that this is the guiding principle for
all our decision-making. Here it is worth noting that Aquinas holds a natural law theory of
morality: what is good and evil, according to Aquinas, is derived from the rational nature
of human beings. Good and evil are thus both objective and universal.

Aquinas also introduces what he calls the Human Law which gives rise to what
he calls “Secondary Precepts”. These might include such things as do not drive above
70mph on a motorway, do not kidnap people, always wear a helmet when riding a bike,
do not hack into someone’s bank account. Secondary precepts are not generated by our
reason but rather are imposed by governments, groups, clubs, societies, etc.

However, the primary precepts that derive from the Natural Law are quite
general, such as, pursue good and shun evil. So we need to create secondary precepts
which can actually guide our day-to-day behavior. But we are fallible so sometimes we
get these secondary precepts wrong, sometimes we get them right. When they are
wrong they only reflect our apparent goods. When they are right they reflect our real
goods.

You might also like