10.4324 9781849773645 Previewpdf
10.4324 9781849773645 Previewpdf
10.4324 9781849773645 Previewpdf
Understanding
Sustainable
Development
Understanding Sustainable
Development
Understanding Sustainable
Development
John Blewitt
London • Sterling, VA
First published by Earthscan in the UK and USA in 2008
Copyright © John Blewitt, 2008
All rights reserved
ISBN: 978-1-84407-455-6 hardback
978-1-84407-454-9 paperback
Typeset by MapSet Ltd, Gateshead, UK
Printed and bound in the UK by TJ International, Padstow
Cover design by Yvonne Booth
For a full list of publications please contact:
Earthscan
Dunstan House
14a St Cross Street
London EC1N 8XA, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7841 1930
Fax: +44 (0)20 7242 1474
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.earthscan.co.uk
22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling, VA 20166-2012, USA
Earthscan publishes in association with the International Institute for Environment and Development
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Blewitt, John, 1957-
Understanding sustainable development / John Blewitt.
p. cm.
ISBN 978-1-84407-455-6 (hbk.) — ISBN 978-1-84407-454-9 (pbk.) 1. Sustainable development. I. Title.
HC79.E5B58 2008
338.9’27—dc22
2008016057
Introduction ix
Environmental Justice 75
References 251
Index 279
List of Figures, Tables
and Boxes
Figures
1.1 The guiding principles of Securing the Future 20
6.1 Constituents of wellbeing 124
8.1 National ecofootprints (to scale) 176
8.2 The funnel as a metaphor 181
8.3 The Natural Step Framework: The ABCD process 183
8.4 Illustration for a neighbourhood or community 188
8.5 Australia: GDP and GPI, 1950–1996 (constant 1990 prices) 195
8.6 State of the future index 197
Tables
Boxes
There is a word for it: Zeitgeist. A German known about climate change for many years
word meaning something like climate or spirit but refused to acknowledge that we were
of the times. Today, the Zeitgeist is one that mainly responsible for it. Too big a responsibil-
embraces a growing recognition that human ity for us to handle? Or just an inconvenient
actions have impacted seriously and truth? It is as ridiculous to be a climate
negatively on our planet’s ecosystems. change denier as it is to believe the Earth is
Debates over climate change are now focusing flat. Attitudinal and political change is
on mitigation and adaptation rather than happening slowly, too slowly perhaps; but it is
whether it is happening or what is causing it. happening.
The answer to this last question is fairly simple Sustainable development is simple. It is
and generally agreed. Human action is the the idea that the future should be a better,
predominant cause of the massive and rapid healthier, place than the present. The idea is
acceleration of greenhouse gasses, global not new, but the way it is understood, reflected
warming and climate turbulence. Our ways of upon, cultivated and implemented possibly is.
doing business, of producing goods and Neither modern nor postmodern, sustainable
services, have used the Earth’s resources as if development requires an understanding of the
they were inexhaustible. The Earth itself has natural world and the human social world as
been treated simultaneously as a factory, being not so much ‘connected’ as one and the
pleasure park, garbage dump, larder, market- same. Sustainable development is a process
place and war zone. It is self-evident that we, that requires us to view our lives as elements
as a species, cannot continue as we are doing. of a larger entity. It requires a holistic way of
Obscene poverty and fabulous wealth live side looking at the world and human life. It requires
by side, and the natural world, for many, can a recognition that other people may not see
not be accessed at all. Things are not what things like this at all and will have different
they used to be, although poverty, inequality, perceptions, values, philosophies, aims and
injustice, environmental degradation and war ambitions. It requires an understanding that
are not exactly modern phenomena. But now the world is multi-faceted, fragmented and
we cannot simply continue in the same old complete. This may not be easy to grasp at
way without putting the future at risk of not first, but it is a way of looking at the world and
happening at all. Hence the imperative of one which increasingly makes sense. That, in
sustainable development – our evolving spirit any case, is my view.
of the times. It has been a long time coming There are other views. Sustainable devel-
and there have been many resistances and opment is the product of many stories,
refusals along the way. For instance, we have worldviews, values, actions and perspectives
x Understanding Sustainable Development
which to be fully appreciated require a readi- roots in ensuring that the planet’s ecosystems
ness to listen to others, respect differences, are protected from the ravages of human
suspend established opinions, and see with civilization. Maybe the best way to view
others’ eyes while allowing other voices to sustainable development is as a collage or a
resonate and be heard. Sustainable develop- kaleidoscope of shapes, colours and patterns
ment both requires dialogue and is a dialogue that change constantly as we ourselves
of values. That is the underpinning rationale change. It is for us, therefore, to make sense of
of this book in offering a series of guides and the world in all its complexity. We must avoid
signposts to a range of contributions to this imposing convenient conceptual frameworks
dialogue. Of course, this view is both which the world just does not fit but which
contestable and not particularly original, but if we find comfortable or accessible. There is a
elements within the text motivate further need to acknowledge that we do not, and
thought, reflection and dialogue, then maybe cannot, understand everything,
hopefully our understanding of sustainable however hard we might try. Uncertainty and
development will have been advanced just a the incomplete nature of our knowledge do
little bit further. not require us to apply simple, or simplistic,
Many people are coming to sustainable solutions to problems. Complex problems
development with little understanding of the require complex solutions. Sustainable devel-
key issues and debates. They may have a deep opment warrants an attitude of mind that
and detailed knowledge of one specific area, welcomes change, difference, creativity, risk,
but only the vaguest of inklings of anything uncertainty, a sense of wonder, and a desire
beyond. Others may have a general but and capacity to learn. It is a heuristic – a way
confused understanding of the theories and of learning about life and through life. The
perspectives because they are immersed in its importance of learning should never be
practice. Some people see sustainable devel- forgotten. We can only grow, flourish and be
opment as essentially about the environment, sustainable if we learn.
and indeed sustainable development has its
Speaking Personally
Having just written about values, perspectives passion. I have noticed my social, political and
and sustainable development, it is perhaps ethical values becoming slowly greener with
only right to say a little about my own under- the years. I have a strong commitment to
standing of sustainable development and my social and environmental justice, and a
own learning and journey towards it. Like so number of writers and practitioners have been
many other things, my values have evolved, significant influences on my learning journey.
taken on different hues, as I have learned I have been particularly open to the social
more about the world, other people and ecology of Murray Bookchin, the bioregional-
myself. Having been a teacher in adult, further ism and humanism of Lewis Mumford, and
and higher education for about 25 years, increasingly the ancient wisdom and spiritual
learning is actually my business as well as my engagement of indigenous peoples. The work
Introduction xi
of Greg Buckman, Wolfgang Sacks and colleagues. Teaching is the corollary of learn-
Vandana Shiva has been extremely important ing, but our learning must not simply be
for me too. Finally, I have always been most at confined to abstract academic exercises or a
ease with an interdisciplinary or trans- playing with words. Learning must be married
disciplinary approach to understanding the to change, and words to action. As the
world around us. No one discipline can gener- American philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson
ate a holistic understanding of human beings (Ziff, 1982, p61) wrote in his famous 1836
and their relationship to the planet or each essay Nature:
other. Having said this, I have nonetheless
Words are finite organs of the infinite mind.
tried to be even handed in my selection and
They cannot cover the dimensions of what is
account of ideas, values, issues and actions in truth. They break, chop and impoverish it.
discussed in this book. I have used a variety of An action is the perfection and publication of
sources and have learned a great deal from thought. A right action seems to fill the eye,
many people – friends, family, students and and be related to all nature.
The chapters of this book are relatively self- development is told through the establish-
contained, but together make for an ment and work of major institutions, and this
understanding of sustainable development chapter does that too with sections on the
that celebrates complexity and diversity. The World Bank, the United Nations, the World
various sections hopefully demonstrate why Trade Organization, and the major interna-
sustainable development is such a necessity. tional milestones that encompass Stockholm,
Theoretical discussions are interspersed with Rio, Kyoto, Johannesburg, Seattle and other
empirical case studies, and at the end of each iconic place names. Towards the end of the
chapter are some ‘thinking questions’ that chapter the focus narrows to show how
may serve as guides for future and continuing sustainable development policy has been
reflection. articulated in a national context, and, using
Chapter One focuses on issues of global- the example of the ongoing struggles to
ization and sustainable development by conserve the ancient temporal forests of
exploring four specific worldviews and then British Columbia in Clayoquot Sound, the
moving on to examine how the language of relationship between the local and the global
economics has shaped much of the discourse. is analysed. Finally, the idea of sustainable
The human experience of economic growth development constituting a ‘dialogue of
and development offers many salutary lessons values’ is outlined.
– poverty, sweatshops, debt, slums and crime. Chapter Two explores some of the major
The work of renowned economists Jeffrey philosophical, theoretical and ethical contri-
Sachs and Joseph Stiglitz and the more radical butions to the evolving process of sustainable
critiques of globalization articulated by Greg development. Each section is connected so
Buckman and George Monbiot are also that the reader may detect similarities and
discussed. Frequently, the story of sustainable differences between the various perspectives
xii Understanding Sustainable Development
and may gain the opportunity to learn new is not just environmentalism is reinforced
things or perhaps revisit previously discounted throughout by demonstrating the complexity
points of view. From ‘deep ecology’ to ‘actor and interconnectedness of the issues, actions,
network theory’ to ‘environmental moderniza- challenges and hopes of many sustainability
tion’, this chapter maps sustainable practitioners. Human beings have the capacity,
development’s intellectual terrain. Chapter and the capability, to right the wrongs and
Three extends these earlier excursions by repair the damage they have done if they have
reviewing some of the major controversies, the collective will to do so. Chapter Six
disputes and conflicts which sustainable examines the central importance of econom-
development has stimulated. The ideas and ics and business, which have been frequently
priorities of the Danish statistician Bjørn viewed as a major cause of the problem but
Lomborg, whose view on climate change and are now increasingly seen as a necessary part
much else is hotly contested, shows how of the solution. How could it be otherwise,
energetic the debate can be and how a certain given their overwhelming importance in
contrariness can motivate others to develop, fashioning everyone’s ways of life, material
refine and rearticulate their own views. The wellbeing and life opportunities? Views of
role and meaning of ‘sound science’ is also course differ, ranging from the revolutionary
explored using genetic modification as an dismantling of the global economic system to
example. Some space is also dedicated to its restructuring and reshaping through
outlining the concept of the risk society and processes of localization, eco-efficiency and
its relevance to understanding the idea that corporate responsibility as exemplified by such
ultimately sustainability is a political act. companies as Interface and such practices as
Chapter Four moves towards the social fair trade. A discussion of economic growth
and environmental spheres by discussing the and the hegemony of gross domestic product
growing significance of the environmental (GDP) frames these explorations.
justice movement. The reality of the poor, the Now to the future. Chapter Seven looks at
disadvantaged and the exploited always how the future has been and is being
seeming to be the victims of corporate greed, conceived, by addressing the value of utopian
government corruption or history demon- thinking and some practical attempts to
strates that at the core of sustainable establish prefigurative ecovillages. What
development is a moral imperative. Given the humans can dream, they can also create in
unavoidable and mesmerizing advances of their physical lives on Earth. Much attention is
new media technologies throughout the devoted to urban development and environ-
globe, the significance of information and mental design, because today over half the
communication technology (ICT) is also world’s population live in urban settlements
explored as a means towards fashioning a and because the origins of our present crises
more just and healthy world. Chapter Five can often be traced back to problems with
shifts the focus onto the political, looking at urban design and planning. Techniques and
human agency, ecological democratization, examples of backcasting and scenario analysis
environmental campaigning, civic action, the are also discussed. Chapter Eight moves the
politics of place and community empower- focus on to the resolutely practical by explor-
ment. The idea that sustainable development ing the connectivity between means and ends,
Introduction xiii
tools and practices, indices and the nature of ingredients for community development and
human wellbeing and human flourishing. personal engagement. The chapter ends with a
Ecological footprinting and environmental reference to the culture of aboriginal peoples,
space, the Natural Step Framework and the suggesting that leaders are less important
Global Reporting Initiative, and eco-labelling than developing wisdom and respect for
and consumption have as their aim to enable nature and, by implication, each other.
us to live on the only planet we have. Chapter Sustainable development encompasses
Nine links communication, marketing, new far more than can be covered in one book, so
media, education and learning as both accompanying Understanding Sustainable
vehicles for, and integral aspects of, sustain- Development is a website providing illustrative
able development. This immensely important and complementary material, resources and
field is central to fashioning a sustainable links which will enable the reader to further
world, although here, as with so much else, explore subjects, ideas and actions – see
there are debates and disputes as well as www.people.ex.ac.uk/jdblewit/. But beware,
dialogue. Combined with action, communica- there are no magic bullets. No one way of
tion and learning are ways through which squaring the circle. Sustainable development
many peoples, groups and communities can is, and probably always will be, work in
find their true voice and if necessary invite progress. What we do and how we understand
themselves to the high table of policy formu- what we do is key to making fewer mistakes,
lation and practical action. The final chapter, to learning better ways and to nurturing the
Chapter Ten, explores leadership and manage- hope that our future will be a better place
ment, with practical case-study examples and than the past for the Earth and all that lives
by rooting the idea and need for leadership in and relies upon it.
some of the key values and philosophies Some brief acknowledgements are now in
informing the dialogue on sustainability and order. My thanks go to Donna Ladkin, John
sustainable development. The management Merefield, Alan Dyer and Stewart Barr, whose
system Project SIGMA is rooted in the idea of comments on a very scruffy early draft were
environmental modernization, and the maver- immensely valuable, to Rob West of Earthscan
ick businessman Ricardo Semler’s leadership for commissioning the book and appreciating
achievements are rooted in corporate creativ- the need for a dialogic approach, to my many
ity, knowledge innovation and self- students over the years, particularly on the
organization. The practicalities of dialogue, MSc Sustainable Development course at the
the significance of emotional intelligence, and University of Exeter, and to my wife Lorna,
the capacity for understanding, being and who is an inspiration and without whom I
working with others are presented as key could not have written this at all.
List of Acronyms
and Abbreviations
Aims
The aim of this chapter is introduce the complexity of contemporary ecological and
concepts of globalization and sustainable other problems, and through a vast array of
development, indicating the complex and differing perspectives, values and interests.
contested nature of various debates, actions The chapter ends with the suggestion that
and practices. The significance and critiques of sustainable development is perhaps best
some key international agreements will be understood as a ‘dialogue of values’ – a way of
discussed. Sustainable development has devel- encouraging people to learn, to discover and
oped through political and environmental to evaluate.
struggles, through an engagement with the
Globalization
Like so many other concepts, globalization has worldwide interconnectedness in all aspects of
been subject to a considerable amount of contemporary social life, from the cultural to
debate in academic and policy circles. Although the criminal, the financial to the spiritual.
a few people dispute either whether globaliza-
tion is actually occurring, or whether it is a Held et al recognize the importance of various
useful way of making sense of current trends spatial attributes suggesting globalization can
and processes, there is a general consensus that be located on a continuum that includes the
globalization is real and that it characterizes local, national and regional understood as
the nature of our times. There are a number of functioning clusters of states, economic
definitions on offer, including notions of relations, networks and societies. The authors
space–time compression and accelerating continue (1999, p15):
interdependence, but for Held et al (1999, p2):
Globalization can be taken to refer to those
Globalization may be thought of initially as spatio-temporal processes of change which
the widening, deepening and speeding up of underpin a transformation in the organization
2 Understanding Sustainable Development
Public debates, discussions and discourses on in the long run improve the environment
globalization and the environment reveal a and people’s material wellbeing.
wide range of perspectives and worldviews.
Clapp and Dauvergne (2005) offer a fourfold Institutionalists
categorization, while recognizing that their
• The primary causes of global environmen-
categories are ideal types and that many
tal problems are weak institutions and
organizations, groups and individuals share
inadequate global cooperation, which has
elements drawn from two or more. Complexity
failed to correct environmental failures,
and interconnectedness frequently character-
promote development or counteract the
ize both our world and our attempts to make
self-interested nature of some states’
sense of it. The four categories are identified
actions.
in the following sections.
• The main opportunity of globalization is
to enhance opportunities for cooperation,
Market liberals
capacity-building and innovative eco-
• The main causes of global environmental efficient technologies which will generally
problems are poverty and poor economic enhance human wellbeing. The precau-
growth brought on by market failures and tionary principle should inform the
bad government polices that lead to evaluation of new developments.
market distortions (for example subsidies
or unclear property rights). Bio-environmentalists
• Globalization is largely positive because it
• The main causes of the environmental
fosters economic growth and, combined
crisis are excessive economic growth,
with the application of modern science
over-population, over-consumption and
and technology and human ingenuity, will
4 Understanding Sustainable Development
The discipline of economics has had a ultimately depend. Human activity consumes
profound influence on the conceptualization this natural capital, relying on the ecosystem
of sustainability and development, and much services to support our standard and quality
of this is due to the application and extension of life. Apart from consuming this natural
of the notion of ‘capital’ beyond the spheres capital – oil, timber, fish and so forth – our
of economics, business and finance. In the productive activities have frequently impaired
18th century the Scottish economist Adam the functioning of environmental services. We
Smith recognized that the accumulation of have polluted rivers, destroyed natural
fixed and reproducible capital, understood habitats, rendered land toxic or air unbreath-
largely as productive machinery, combined able, released greenhouse gases into the
with the increasing division or specialization atmosphere, and consumed mineral and
of labour, was key to economic growth and energy resources that cannot be renewed or
development. Since Smith’s time, economists regenerated.
and other theorists have extended the capital To compensate for the loss, or contamina-
metaphor to include human capital (educa- tion, of this critical natural capital, substitutes
tion and skills), social capital (social may be sought in the form of new renewable
relationships and networks) and natural energy technologies, human ingenuity and
capital (natural resources and ecosystem future technological advances (man-made
services), which in turn may be divided into capital). A Micawber-like optimism occasion-
renewable resource capital and non-renew- ally characterizes such an approach –
able resource capital. A further concept, something will always turn up in the end.
critical natural capital, has also been devel- Arguments focus on the extent to which one
oped. This refers to those aspects of the global capital stock may be substituted for another
ecosystem upon which our lives and cultures in order to maintain a constant stock of global
Globalization and Sustainable Development 5
medium-term goals, which may need to rather than simply on nature – human beings
encompass local and regional imperatives like are part of the wider ecosystem and sustain-
water or land conservation, and the more able development projects need to articulate
long-term goals, which must encompass that fact. For Norton, there is not just scarcity
planetary survival, the health and wellbeing of in the economic sense, but also scarcity of
future generations, and the regulation of good ideas and effective action. In the words
population increase. For Norton, adaptive of Homer-Dixon (2002), there is ‘an ingenuity
management means human intellect and gap’.
practice working as an integral part of nature
In September 2000, at the United Nations • reversing the spread of major diseases –
Millennium Summit, world leaders agreed on especially HIV/AIDS and malaria;
eight measurable Millennium Development • ensuring environmental sustainability;
Goals (MDGs), to be achieved by 2015, in and
addition to outlining broad commitments to • creating global partnerships for develop-
human rights, good governance and democ- ment with targets for trade, aid and debt
racy. Official United Nations figures indicated relief.
the existence of vast inequalities in an
increasingly affluent world – 113 million By 2006, it was also clear that progress
children do not go to school, over a billion towards meeting these goals was slow and
people earn less than $1 a day, 11 million uneven (UN, 2006), with Asia seeing the great-
children die before they are five and preventa- est reduction in poverty but chronic hunger
ble diseases devastate many populations. still widespread in sub-Saharan Africa. There
Inequality and injustice clearly go hand in were significant increases in universal primary
hand, but the Millennium Declaration, as with education, particularly in India, although urban
so many international agreements, was the and gender inequalities remained serious
product of extended dialogue, detailed problems. Women’s position in the labour
negotiation and frustrating compromise (UN, market and child and maternal mortality rates
2000). had improved slightly, although reproductive
The Millennium Development Goals are: healthcare services were still very poor in many
regions. The incidence of HIV/AIDS, tuberculo-
• halving extreme poverty and hunger; sis and malaria was still high. The rate of
• achieving universal primary education; deforestation had slowed down, but forest loss
• empowering women and achieving continued. Half of all developing nations still
gender equality; lacked basic sanitation systems, and although
• reducing mortality for the under fives by development assistance from the more afflu-
two-thirds; ent nations had increased, it was still below
• reducing maternal mortality by three- the targets set a few years earlier. Fourteen per
quarters; cent of the global population had internet
Globalization and Sustainable Development 7
access, but a digital divide was perceived as to 0.7 per cent of gross national product
separating the developing from developed (GNP) is fairly small. ‘The point is that the
nations, with over 50 per cent of the popula- MDGs can be financed within the bounds
tion in developed regions using the World of the official development assistance
Wide Web, as opposed to 7 per cent in devel- that the donor countries have already
oping regions (less than 1 per cent in the least promised’ (Sachs, 2005, p299).
developed nations). Two years earlier, the 5 Tools and information technologies can
Human Development Report for 2004 had also be extremely powerful and effective –
noted uneven progress, stating soberly that: enhancing communication and informa-
tion dissemination, advancing agronomic
at the current pace Sub-Saharan Africa will
practices such as ‘science-based manage-
not meet the goal for universal primary
education until 2129 or the goal for reducing ment of soil nutrients’, aiding the
child mortality by two-thirds until 2106 – 100 development of new medicines and
years away, rather than the 11 called for by the innovation in biotechnology, etc.
goals. In three of the goals – hunger, income
poverty and access to sanitation – no date can
be set because the situation in the region is Sachs calls for, and has faith in the idea of, an
worsening, not improving. enlightened globalization of democracies, of
(Fukuda-Parr, 2004, p132) science and technology, market economies
and multilateralism, with progressive public
Despite all this, the economist Jeffrey Sachs policies at national and international levels
(2005) sees no real reason why the MDGs leading the way. He believes that the big
cannot be realized in full, as they are trans-national corporations have not caused
eminently achievable, requiring relatively the global crisis, although their past behaviour
modest amounts of aid from developed is not unblemished. The anti-globalization
countries and alterations to trading regula- movement’s hostility to capitalism is conse-
tions. He gives five major reasons for this quently not especially well founded. He writes
thinking: (2005, p357):
few issues in what used to be called the ‘Third The global neo-liberal economic agenda,
World’. Various points are made: poverty and structural inequality, and the gap between the
deprivation exist in Japan, the UK and the US rhetoric and reality on human rights and
too; people with disability, who make up environmental protection seem to go largely
around 10 per cent of the global population, unchallenged and unexamined. Veteran neo-
receive no mention, and neither do the elderly, Marxist critic Samir Amin (2006) sees the
who increasingly constitute a significant MDGs as clearly designed to shore up the
percentage of the global poor; and there are North’s global economic and political
no goals and targets for secondary education. dominance of the South. The rhetoric of
The identification of the goals and their ‘partnership’ and the notion of ‘good gover-
accompanying indicators and metrics also nance’ is really about opening up commercial
offer concern. For instance, feminist critics markets for the major economic powers. He
find it difficult to see how gender empower- asks cynically what else can be expected from
ment can be reduced to a single target or goal, an initiative emanating from Japan, the US
as this issue cuts across so many other areas. and Europe and co-sponsored by the
For example, universal primary education is an International Monetary Fund (IMF), the
important vehicle for the achievement of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
gender equality and should therefore not be Development and the World Bank, which for
separable in either policy development or Amin is little more than ‘the G8’s Ministry of
implementation. Setting targets may also Propaganda’.
easily distort social and cultural behaviour, The World Bank’s emphasis is largely on
inducing governments to divert funds to meet the economic aspects of sustainable develop-
reportable targeted areas to the exclusion of ment, suggesting, in language reminiscent of
others arguably as important but not incorpo- corporate business strategies, that if human
rated in the MDGs. Problems with data, wellbeing is to be enhanced, then society has
particularly regarding malaria, tuberculosis to carefully manage its ‘portfolio of assets’,
and maternal mortality, make accurate assess- and recognizing that this mix of ‘assets’
ment and evaluation a most important issue. necessary to support improvements is likely to
There is little point in setting targets if it is change over time. Economic growth at the
uncertain which actions will produce what expense of social and personal wellbeing or
outcomes. The MDGs require that initiatives the natural environment, however, is not a
are costed, but Saith (2006, p1178) suggests feasible option for the future. Unchecked
that: industrial development has led to horrifying
environmental damage in some areas, which,
This immediately reveals the futility of such
like the devastation of the Aral Sea in the
exercises. One might ask: what would it cost to
overcome violence against women? What former Soviet Union, has led to massive
might it cost to address the issue of son human, environmental and economic costs –
preference and the appalling and falling sex disease, pollution, and loss of livelihoods and
ratio at birth? What would it cost to get the ecological habitats. Given this, in theory, then,
parents to agree to send the girl child to
school? How much would have to be spent to global societies are confronted with three
change the laws on property rights? options (World Bank, 2003, p24):
Globalization and Sustainable Development 9
through promoting new technologies and by regulation of the economy and participa-
insisting private businesses seriously consider tion in decision-making processes at all
the social welfare of their employees and the levels.
wider society in which they live. Stiglitz,
however, is not opposed to globalization as The voice of the developing nations ought to
such, as he believes that with appropriate be listened to more frequently. The fictional
regulation, equitable trade laws, and good trial of international financial institutions that
nation-state and corporate governance it can took place in Sissako’s 2006 film Bamako is
be a genuine force for global good. There are taking place in many other forums within
alternatives to the Washington Consensus, global civil society. The US ought to recognize,
which he develops in both Fair Trade for All and act on, its moral obligations to emit less
(Stiglitz and Charlton, 2005) and Making greenhouse gases, particularly CO2, offer more
Globalization Work (Stiglitz, 2006). aid and negotiate better trading arrange-
Acknowledging that making globalization ments. Developing countries frequently do not
work ‘will not be easy’, Stiglitz (2006, p13) have sufficient resources to avoid illegal
suggests a number of general actions that logging, so they should be paid to stop further
can, and should, be initiated to produce a deforestation by, according to the Rainforest
more comprehensive approach to global Coalition led by Papua New Guinea, being
development. These include: allowed to sell carbon offsets for new forest
planting. Stiglitz (2006) also believes that,
• increasing foreign assistence from the although global corporations frequently facili-
rich countries to the poor to the value of tate technology transfers, raise skill standards
at least 0.7 per cent of their GDP; and develop markets which do help develop-
• cancellation or relief of foreign debt of ing countries, their primary purpose to make
which the decision by the G8 at money is clearly articulated by their fiduciary
Gleneagles in 2005, when the debts owed relationship to their stockholders.
by the 18 poorest developing nations to Consequently, to counteract the harmful
the IMF and World Bank was written off is effects of corporate actions, Stiglitz feels it
an example; necessary to reshape private incentives with
• genuine fair, rather than free trade, social costs and benefits to avoid environmen-
recognizing the limitations of economic tal destruction and labour exploitation. This
liberalization and iniquities produced by can be achieved through:
global corporate monopolies and cartels;
• protection of the global environment on • a combination of corporate social respon-
which all economies ultimately depend sibility and stronger regulations to
through a sensible and workable public prevent unfair competition;
management of global natural resources • limitation of corporate power through
and regulations on their usage and on the implementation of effective global
actions giving rise to ‘externalities’ and anti-trust laws;
costs; and • better corporate governance, whereby
• good, democratic government, including companies are held accountable to all
enhanced possibilities for democratic stakeholders – employees and communi-
Globalization and Sustainable Development 11
ties as well as shareholders – making Stiglitz’s time at the World Bank did see some
environmental destruction a crime just changes, with development priorities being
like fraud and embezzlement; refocused on poverty reduction, partnership
• international laws being enacted against and the creation of ‘good policy environments’
price fixing and labour exploitation; and rather than simply economic growth. Despite
• reducing the scope for corruption, with these changes, however, limiting conditions
bribery being viewed as an unfair on development loans remain, constraining
competitive practice and bank secrecy the possibilities of developing nations to ‘own’
eradicated so as to prevent the incentive the preferred development policy (Pender,
to, or possibility of, enhancing after-tax 2001).
profits garnered from questionable
business practices.
Anti-globalization Critiques
Activists and campaigners like Greg Buckman harvests and livelihoods of many local farmers
(2004), Vandana Shiva (2000), Walden Bello in India and other nations (Shiva, 2000). For
(2002) and George Monbiot (2004) criticize Bello (2002), founding director of Focus on the
existing global institutions and international Global South, the IMF and the World Bank
trading systems. Their views have informed have been ‘unmitigated disasters’, with
some of the more radical approaches to oligarchic decision-making defining the World
sustainability and sustainable development. Trade Organization (WTO), and the centralizing
They advocate alternatives that have a differ- tendencies of all three organizations,
ent value base, offering different sets of combined with the inordinate power of big
prescriptions and types of knowledge than corporations, has militated against popular
those currently characterizing the dominant struggles for decentralization and democracy
neo-liberal discourse of economic growth, in many developing nations. At the very least,
development and globalization. For Wolfgang corporate power needs to be checked and
Sachs (1999), of the Wuppertal Institute for regulated more effectively. In Deglobalization:
Climate, Environment and Energy, the costs Ideas for a New World Economy (Bello, 2004),
and benefits of economic globalization have he states that continuing anti-globalization
not been equitably globalized, and nature has action must be married to concrete proposals
itself been colonized through the 1994 TRIPS for an alternative system re-empowering local
(Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights) and national economies and re-embedding
Agreement, which gives corporations the right the economy in society, rather than having
to patent genetic materials such as micro- society driven by imperatives such as profit
organisms, seeds and even cells. This has maximization, cost-efficiency and other
helped ‘modernize’ agriculture, reinforcing the market verities. This may be accomplished by:
commercial advantages of growing cash crops
in the developing world for markets in devel- • allowing countries to use their own inter-
oped countries, and has effectively stolen the nal financial resources to promote
12 Understanding Sustainable Development
the country of origin. ‘Footloose capital’ would production, manufacture and distribution, its
be fettered. Multinationals would not be own operations and those of its suppliers and
sub-contractors met the necessary standards.
allowed to move from country to country If, for example, a food-processing company
seeking lower labour and environmental based in Switzerland wished to import cocoa
standards in order to boost or maintain from the Ivory Coast, it would need to demon-
profitability. Instead, corporations would be strate that the plantations it bought from
were not employing slaves, using banned
obliged, through incentives, to set high
pesticides, expanding into protected forests or
standards and would be punished if they did failing to conform to whatever other
not. Producers and consumers should carry standards the FTO set. The firm’s performance
their own costs and not dump them on other would be assessed, at its own expense, by a
people. Monbiot writes (2003): monitoring company accredited to the organi-
zation. There would be, in other words, no
The FTO would, in this respect, function as a difference between this operation and the
licensing body: a company would not be activities of the voluntary fair trade movement
permitted to trade between nations unless it today.
could demonstrate that, at every stage of
Sustainable development is about protecting US operates at a national level, but its effects
and conserving the planet’s natural environ- may be experienced far wider. And there are
ment and promoting social equity and a countless numbers of community groups,
degree of economic equality within and businesses, and formally or informally struc-
between nations. This can be conceptualized tured activist organizations that operate at
as a process of convergence, so the question the very smallest scales. National or neigh-
of spatial scale is a necessary element in any bourhood campaigns to reduce, recycle or
serious thinking, and action, designed to make reuse will ultimately rely on individual house-
our world a better place. It is possible to
Table 1.1 Ecological and socio-political
conceive of scale in ecological and socio-
scales
political terms (Table 1.1).
Institutions and organizations operate at Ecological Scale Socio-political Scale
many different levels. The United Nations and Biosphere World
the World Bank are large international bodies Biome type Supra-national regions
operating on the global scale, and through Biome State
their various projects they shape the lives of Landscape Region
people in specific communities and house- Ecosystem Locality 1: city, town
Community Locality 2: village,
holds. These bodies may develop and
community,
implement policies, treaties and actions that
neighbourhood
affect all ecological scales. The European Population Household
Union operates at a supra-national level and Organism
the Environmental Protection Agency in the
Source: Grainger (2004).
14 Understanding Sustainable Development
holds and citizens wanting to conduct carbon neutral, this may be practically impos-
themselves in a more sustainable manner. sible. However, the actions of ‘transition
Complementing, and perhaps complicating, towns’ may contribute to overall sustainability
this further are the various ‘capitals’ dispersed at higher levels and, most importantly, inspire,
across the planet on a variety of spatial scales. communicate or model sustainable action for
When we consider also the possible ‘condi- people in other localities. As towns and cities
tions’ – strong, weak or very weak – it may are intensive resource users, often having
become very difficult to see some capitals huge environmental footprints, any improve-
applying to more than one spatial scale. ment will impact positively on global
Grainger suggests that under the very weak sustainability. Actions at the local level, if
condition, critical natural capital is meaning- multiplied, may influence policy and practice
ful at a global scale but becomes less so at at higher levels. We can act locally and think
lower ones. There are implications too with globally. We can also act globally and nation-
regard to practical action and communication. ally too, as Pontin and Roderick (2007)
As a consequence of natural and other demonstrate in their call for a ‘converging
endowments, it may not be possible for a world’ of equitable resource use across the
small town or village to be sustainable if planet, initiated by grass roots, community-
sustainability is understood in isolation from based action incorporating carbon offsetting,
the wider ecological or political processes, or if civic dialogue, fair trade business develop-
it is isolated from other towns, villages and ment, one planet living, localization and the
surrounding rural hinterlands. Although an emergence of broader solidarity movements
individual town may strive towards being linking North and South.
The 1960s and 1970s witnessed a growing Boulding wrote ‘The economics of the coming
concern that economic growth, development Spaceship Earth’, in which there were no
and lifestyle demands in industrial nations unlimited reservoirs of anything, with human-
were undermining the ecological balance, ity having to find its place in a cyclical
economic stability and security of the planet. ecological system capable of continuous
World famous pressure groups were formed, reproduction while continually needing inputs
like Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace. A of energy. In 1970 the first environmental
number of ecologically minded writers came event to have any real social and cultural
to prominence, key texts including Rachel impact was held in the US, following an earlier
Carson’s Silent Spring (2000, first published discussion in the United Nations that there
1962), Charles A. Reich’s The Greening of should be a global holiday, an Earth Day, to
America (1970), Theodore Roszak’s Making of draw attention to environmental degradation.
a Counter Culture (1969) and Where the In 1972 the editors of The Ecologist issued a
Wasteland Ends (1972), and E. F. Schumacher’s call to action, writing, in A Blueprint for
Small is Beautiful (1973). In 1966 Kenneth E. Survival (Goldsmith et al, 1972, p15):
Globalization and Sustainable Development 15
The principal defect of the industrial way of placing the responsibility for human survival
life with its ethos of expansion is that it is not firmly in the political arena at a time when
sustainable. Its termination within the lifetime
of someone born today is inevitable – unless it
leaders seemed more concerned with Cold
continues to be sustained for a while longer by War ideological posturing than addressing
an entrenched minority at the cost of impos- issues of global poverty, social inequality,
ing great suffering on the rest of mankind. justice, self-determination, human rights and
the depletion of natural resources. The
1972 also saw the publication of Limits to Commission did not redefine development,
Growth by a global think-tank known as the but noted:
Club of Rome and the first serious interna-
One must avoid the persistent confusion of
tional discussion of global environmental
growth with development, and we strongly
issues at the United Nations Conference on emphasize that the prime objective of devel-
the Human Environment in Stockholm. opment is to lead to self-fulfilment and
The Club of Rome (Meadows et al, 1972) creative partnership in the use of a nation’s
report attempted to combine optimism productive forces and its full human potential.
(Brandt, 1980, p23)
concerning human potential to innovate and
transcend environmental and demographic
In 1983 work started on a major study by the
problems with a warning that if contemporary
World Commission on Environment and
trends continued there would be dire conse-
Development that would firmly establish
quences. Their global model was built
sustainable development as the most signifi-
specifically to investigate five major trends –
cant concept and practice of our time. In 1987
accelerating industrialization, rapid population
the results were published as Our Common
growth, widespread malnutrition, depletion of
Future (the Brundtland Report). More than
non-renewable resources and a deteriorating
half of the Commission were representatives
environment. The authors posed a key
from developing countries, ensuring that
question: What do we want our world to be
global environmental concerns would not
like? Achieving a self-imposed limitation to
overwhelm the desire to eradicate problems of
growth would require considerable effort. It
human need and poverty. Unlike Brandt,
would involve learning to do many things in
Brundtland did offer a definition of sustain-
new ways. It would tax the ingenuity, the
able development (WCED, 1987, p43):
flexibility and the self-discipline of the human
race. Bringing a deliberate, controlled end to Development that meets the needs of the
growth would be a tremendous challenge, not present without compromising the ability of
easily met. Would the final result be worth it? future generations to meet their own needs.
What would humanity gain by such a transi-
tion, and what would it lose? Thirty years later, This definition is still commonly used, despite
three of the authors published an update its attracting serious criticisms for suggesting
(Meadows et al, 2005) indicating how their that economic growth, industrial moderniza-
theory of limits to growth remained vital and tion and market imperatives should be key
significant. drivers and goals for all nations. Whereas the
In 1980 the Brandt Commission published industrialized North seemed to be, and in
its North–South: A Programme for Survival, many ways still is, concerned with environ-
16 Understanding Sustainable Development
mental impacts, the issues confronting the Five years later, in 1992, the UN Conference on
majority South included poverty, health, Environment and Development, the follow-up
income, agricultural sustainability, food to Stockholm, was held in Rio de Janeiro. This
security, educational opportunity and achieve- meeting, known as the Earth Summit,
ment, shelter, sanitation, desertification and produced a number of agreements, including
armed conflict. Nevertheless, the Brundtland the Rio Declaration on Environment and
Report did tacitly recognize the internal Development, the Framework Convention on
contradictions within the concept when it Climate Change, the Convention on Biological
stated (WCED, 1987, p43): Diversity, a non-binding Statement on Forest
Principles, and the hugely cumbersome but
[Sustainable development] contains within it
nonetheless important agreement known as
two key concepts:
1 The concept of ‘needs’, in particular the Agenda 21 (Grubb et al, 1993).
essential needs of the world’s poor, to The Convention on Biological Diversity
which over-riding priority should be (CBD) and the negotiations before and after
given; and the Kyoto Protocol on climate mitigation are
2 The idea of limitations imposed by the
state of technology and social organiza- two important examples of multilateral
tion on the environment’s ability to meet environmental agreements (MEAs).
present and future needs. Maintaining biological diversity is key to
maintaining the planet’s overall health.
Although acknowledging its analysis and Healthy ecosystems replenish natural
recommendations to be specifically rooted in resources, offering all creatures the dynamic
the 1980s, Our Common Future concluded its equilibrium upon which life depends. If plant
outline of sustainable development by stating and animal species disappear, as they are
that its realization requires (WCED, 1987, p65): doing at an unprecedented rate, then
monocultures will emerge that are highly
• A political system that secures effective susceptible to disease, global warming and
citizen participation in decision-making;
other ecological changes. Industrialized
• An economic system that is able to
generate surpluses and technical knowl- systems of agricultural production and other
edge on a self-reliant and sustained basis; commercial activities are creating monocul-
• A social system that provides for tures, and both governments and corporations
solutions for the tensions arising from officially recognize that such impacts must be
disharmonious development;
• A production system that respects the mitigated and managed – biological diversity
obligations to preserve the ecological must be conserved, resources must be used
base for development; more sustainability and the benefits from the
• A technological system that can search planet’s genetic resources shared (more)
continuously for new solutions;
equitably. Following Rio, many national strate-
• An international system that fosters
sustainable patterns of trade and finance; gies have been based on these broad
and international agreements, although indige-
• An administrative system that is flexible nous peoples and local communities have not
and has the capacity for self-correction.
always found their inputs accepted when the
actual implementation processes are closely
scrutinized. Trade and commercial imperatives
Globalization and Sustainable Development 17
have tended to lead to rather weak attach- including the Kyoto Protocol and the reports
ments to sustainable development. Probably of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental
most depressing have been the limited, tortu- Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), concentrate
ous and hesitant agreements leading to and almost exclusively on reducing greenhouse gas
from Kyoto – so far the only international, emissions, largely ignoring the wider social and
legally binding agreement on climate change. gender impacts. By 2007, only:
The agreed 5.2 per cent reduction by 2012 of
four out of the fourteen National Adaptation
greenhouse gas emissions relative to 1990 (8
Plans of Action that have been submitted to
per cent for the EU) was seen by many, even in the global climate change convention specifi-
1997, as painfully inadequate, not least cally mention the importance of gender
because developing nations like China were equality. The MDGs set out global benchmarks
not included. The conversion of pollution on gender equality, poverty eradication and
environmental sustainability, although
sources into tradable commodities through national reports have so far neglected to
emissions trading was allowed, with the seriously address the linkages between these
biggest entitlements going to the worst areas.
polluters. The biggest per capita emitter of all, (WEDO, 2007, p3)
the US, refused to accept even this. Ten years
later, at the G8 summit in Germany, the A United Nations Environment Programme
American administration of George W. Bush (UNEP, 2006) survey, ‘Gender mainstreaming
finally recognized the reality of human- among environment ministries’, discovered
induced climate change, but still refused to that just two countries involved in climate
endorse international action to significantly change activities had incorporated a gender
curb emissions. Towards the end of 2007, the perspective. However, as well as arguing that
US hosted its own international conference on women often suffer disproportionately from
climate mitigation, and reluctantly agreed to unsustainable development, the organization
support as yet unspecified climate reduction promotes women as important agents for
targets at the United Nations-sponsored community empowerment, social leadership
climate conference in Bali. and positive change. As the World
Issues of climate change, global poverty, Conservation Union has shown (IUCN, 2007),
economic inequality and water shortage also communities often cope more effectively
highlight the significance of gender in sustain- during natural disasters when women play a
able development. Although much attention leadership role in early warning systems and
has focused inevitably on the appalling post-disaster reconstruction than when they
inequalities and hardships many women do not. The report also notes that women’s
experience, gender issues cannot be separated local knowledge and skills may offer tangible
from wider social, cultural or environmental benefits, for example the Inuit women of
concerns. The Women’s Environment and Northern Canada have a deep understanding
Development Organization (WEDO) has of weather conditions, being traditionally
campaigned vigorously to combat the inter- responsible for evaluating hunting conditions.
governmental blindness to the gender When a drought occurred in the small islands
implications of environmental policy and of Micronesia, local women who had a sound
actions. Global climate change negotiations, knowledge of island hydrology found potable
18 Understanding Sustainable Development
water by digging a new well. WEDO (2007, p3) and good governance.
adds that ‘women tend to share information Rio was, despite all the compromises and
related to community wellbeing, choose less shortfalls, a significant achievement which
polluting energy sources and adapt more over the years has gained in stature and
easily to environmental changes when their authority, not least, and somewhat paradoxi-
families’ survival is at stake’. cally, because of the reluctance of the US to
The 40 chapters of Agenda 21 offer an accept sustainable development policies, its
action plan for sustainable development, frequent refusal to recognize the importance
integrating environmental with social and of the precautionary principle as a guide to
economic concerns, and articulating a partici- environmental law, the necessity of reaching
patory, community-based approach to a global agreements on cutting greenhouse gas
variety of issues, including population control, emissions and its continuing support for neo-
transparency, partnership working, equity and liberal economic globalization. Also, again
justice, and placing market principles within a somewhat paradoxically, the fact that the Rio
regulatory framework. Local Agenda 21 (LA21), Declaration was seriously criticized by many
its local realization, was and remains not radical green groups made its achievement all
legally binding, although by the end of 2000 the more valuable and iconic. For instance, The
many countries, including the UK, had policies Ecologist magazine published a sharp critique,
and frameworks for sustainable development Whose Common Future? (The Ecologist, 1993),
at local and regional levels, with municipal in which the editor Edward Goldsmith noted
governments in many countries taking a the real question is not how the environment
strong lead. In those, particularly should be managed, but who, and in whose
Scandinavian, countries where local govern- interest? We may share one planet, but we do
ment has a considerable degree of autonomy so in an unequal and frequently unjust way. In
to raise income locally and regulate environ- addition, poverty is not the absence of a
mental matters, LA21 has been most Western lifestyle and neither is it the cause of
successful. However, throughout the world, environmental degradation, rather it is a
even though local government priorities and consequence. Globalized neo-liberal econom-
powers may differ, global structures of ics and free trade will destroy cultural and
economic, financial and political power which biological diversity, not conserve it. Pollution
include support for the neo-liberal free trade and other externalities are caused, not cured,
system have compromised attempts to by modernization and development, and
fashion sustainable development from the global environmental management, technol-
bottom up. The local cannot be disassociated ogy transfer and World Bank-financed
or disconnected from the global, conceptually infrastructure projects (for example US$50
or practically. Nonetheless, the LA21 process billion for 500 dams in 92 developing
continued with, from 2002, Local Agenda 21 countries) reinforce the economic and political
turning into Local Action 21. In 2004 the hegemony of the developed nations, particu-
‘Aalborg Commitments’ (CEMR/ICLEI, 2004) larly the US (Baker, 2006), while leading to
was published, showing many local authorities further environmental and social problems.
within the European Union to be firmly There is much evidence to support these
embracing the need for urban sustainability assertions. After serious protests and much
Globalization and Sustainable Development 19
adverse publicity, in part due to the relentless ment, fostering health and education, provid-
campaigning of the Booker Prize-winning ing shelter, eradicating poverty, and sustaining
novelist Arundhati Roy, the World Bank economic growth. The role of trade and
reviewed its commitment to the Narmada overseas development aid, the importance of
Dams project in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh debt reduction and good governance in the
in India, admitting that it was likely that one developing world, and the mobilization of
million people would be adversely affected national economic resources and external
through displacement and/or loss of livelihood investment were directly addressed. Economic
by the project. The Bank withdrew its support. crises underscore the importance of effective
In 2002, the Johannesburg Summit social safety nets (UN, 2002b).
reviewed progress. The tensions apparent in For many anti-globalization protestors
1992 remained, with the ideas and values of who had earlier demonstrated against the
market liberals and institutionalists still extension of the free trade rules of the WTO in
dominating, though the final Declaration Seattle, the Johannesburg Summit was also a
noted that global disparities in wealth and disappointment, despite some positive
environmental degradation now risk becoming advances. Economic insecurity was recognized
entrenched and that, unless the world acts in as affecting human wellbeing, and globaliza-
a manner that fundamentally changes the tion itself was recognized as a new challenge
lives of the poor, these people may lose confi- for those advocating sustainable develop-
dence in democratic systems of government, ment. And despite all the criticisms,
‘seeing their representatives as nothing more disappointments and missed opportunities,
than sounding brass or tinkling cymbals’, as the intense diplomatic activities did achieve a
stated in Paragraph 15 of the 2002 number of important things, not least a
Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable recognition that sustainable development at a
Development (UN, 2002a). Little was said global level has led to, and requires, policies,
about financing international development, procedures and principles supporting inter-
though in the same year, at an International governmental cooperation and a global civil
Conference on Finance for Development in society that will check, monitor, promote and
Monterrey, northeast Mexico, a consensus was campaign for change in the face of official
reached on financing sustainable develop- reluctance, indifference or denial.
from economic and consumer growth, and, explicitly acknowledged the significance of
more specifically, the Treasury’s application of ecological limits to economic growth. The five
monetary values to ecosystem services. This guiding principles discussed in Securing the
rationalist cost–benefit approach to sustain- Future (Defra, 2005a) are:
ability has continued to tend to characterize
the policies of both Conservative and Labour 1 living within environmental limits;
Governments. 2 ensuring a strong, healthy and just
In 1999 the ‘New Labour’ Government society;
openly addressed sustainable development in 3 achieving a sustainable economy;
a series of policy statements and public 4 promoting good governance; and
speeches, though action came slower than 5 using sound science responsibly.
words. In the UK Government’s 1999 state-
ment on sustainable development, ‘A better The Government also identified four clear
quality of life’, the tension between social and priorities for action:
environmental equity and economic growth
remained evident. A Sustainable Development 1 sustainable consumption and production;
Commission was established in 2001, with 2 climate change and energy;
former Director of Friends of the Earth and 3 natural resource protection environmen-
co-founder of the charity Forum for the tal enhancement; and
Future Jonathan Porritt in the chair. Despite its 4 sustainable communities.
insider status, the Commission issued a critical
report on the Government’s record on sustain- Cross-disciplinary research and the design of
ability in 2004. This led to a reworking of UK sustainability indicators that consistently
policy, resulting in a more refined understand- measure human wellbeing were also identified
ing of sustainable development, which as key priorities.
There has been no shortage of academic Much of this is echoed in Adams (2001, p381),
critiques of sustainable development. Banerjee who in his analysis of environment and
(2003) offers a trenchant analysis of the sustainability in the Third World argues there
sustainable discourse, powerfully arguing that is ‘no magic formula for sustainable develop-
the concept of sustainable development is ment’, no easy reformist solution to poverty
subsumed under, and largely defined by, the and that, contrary to dominant practice,
dominant economic paradigm, and is development ‘ought to be what human
informed by colonial thought which has communities do to themselves’ rather than
resulted in the disempowerment of a majority what is done to them by states, bankers,
of the rural populations in the developing experts, agencies, centralizing planners and
world. Banerjee acknowledges that the others. A ‘green development’ is required, for
sustainable development discourse encom- which there can be no clear blueprints or
passes notions of plurality, and even genuine managerial strategies, because of the
dialogue, but asserts through his analysis of overwhelming need to be open-ended, open-
biotechnology, Western science, biodiversity minded and democratic. Green development is
and intellectual property rights that there about who has the power and how it is
remains a very real danger of marginalizing or managed. It is about empowerment and self-
co-opting the traditional ecological knowl- determination.
edge of indigenous peoples and others who Ignacy Sachs’s (1999) concern with social
depend on their land for their livelihood. A sustainability is a reaction to the dominance
great deal of the discussion around green of the economic discourse in many interna-
business focuses on technicist solutions and tional organizations’ approach to sustainable
eco-efficiency, with green marketing development. Social sustainability encom-
ultimately reduced to the economic bottom passes the absence of war, serious civic
line at the organizational level, obscuring violence and state oppression of citizens
macro-economic factors and likely ecological which destroys community and undermines a
impacts. Conventional rationalizations of people’s sense of hope and meaning. For
competitive advantage still pervade govern- Amartya Sen (1999), realizing human capabili-
mental and corporate literature: ties in a sustainable society means equity,
democracy, human and civil rights, and a
Current development patterns (even those
continuing enhancement of people’s ability to
touted as ‘sustainable’) disrupt social system
and ecosystem relations rather than ensuring do what they have good reason to value. It
that natural resource use by local communities means being able to conceive of alternatives,
meets their basic needs at a level of comfort being able to act and think differently, and
that is satisfactory as assessed by those same having the capacity and opportunity to do so.
communities. What is needed is not a common
future but the future as commons. It means protecting biodiversity, because
(Banerjee, 2003, p174) society is closely interwoven in a coevolution-
ary relationship with the biosphere. It means
conceiving and practising development
22 Understanding Sustainable Development
Thinking Questions
Abers, R. (1998) ‘Learning democratic practice: Amnesty International (2004) Clouds of Disaster:
Distributing government resources through Bhopal Disaster 20 Years On, Amnesty
popular participation in Porto Alegre, Brazil’, in M. International, London
Douglass and J. Friedmann (eds) Cities for Citizens, Anderson, C. (2006) The Long Tail, Random House
John Wiley, London Business Books, London
Abram, D. (1996) The Spell of the Sensuous, Vintage, Anderson, E. N. (1996) Ecologies of the Heart: Emotion,
New York Belief and the Environment, Oxford University
Adams, W. M. (2001) Green Development: Environment Press, Oxford, UK
and Sustainability in the Third World, Routledge, Anderson, P. (1992) A Zone of Engagement, Verso,
London London
Adebowale, M., Church, C. and Shepherd, P. (2004) Anderson, R. C. (1998) Mid-Course Correction,
Environmental Justice in London, London Peregrinzilla Press, Atlanta, GA
Sustainability Exchange, London, available at Anderson, W. T. (2001) All Connected Now: Life in the
www.lsx.org.uk/whatwedo/communities First Global Civilization, Westview Press, Boulder,
_page2604.aspx CO
Agrawal, A. (1995) ‘Dismantling the divide between Andrews, C. (1997) The Circle of Simplicity: Return to
indigenous and scientific knowledge’, Development the Good Life, HarperCollins, London
and Change, vol 26, pp413–439 Appadurai, A. (1996) ‘Disjuncture and difference in the
Agyeman, J. (2005) Sustainable Communities and the global cultural economy’, in A. Appadurai (ed)
Challenge of Environmental Justice, New York Modernity at Large, University of Minnesota Press,
University Press, New York Minneapolis, MN
Agyeman, J. and Evans, B. (2004) ‘Just sustainability: Appadurai, A. (2001) ‘Deep democracy: Urban govern-
The emergence of environmental justice in Britain’, mentality and the horizon of politics’, Environment
The Geographical Journal, vol 170, no 2, and Urbanization, vol 3, no 2, pp23–43
pp155–164 Audit Commission (2005) ‘Local quality of life indica-
Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. and Evans, B. (2002) ‘Exploring tors – Supporting local communities to become
the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, sustainable’, available at www.audit-
environmental justice and equity’, Space and commission.gov.uk
Polity, vol 6 pp77–90 Ausubel, J. H. (2007) ‘Renewable and nuclear heresies’,
Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D. and Evans, B. (eds) (2003) International Journal of Nuclear Governance,
Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal Economy and Ecology, vol 1, no 3, pp229–243
World, Earthscan, London Avolio, B. J. (1999) Full Leadership Development:
Alison, J., Brayer, M-A., Migayrou, F. and Spiller, N. Building the Vital Forces in Organizations, Sage,
(2006) Future City: Experiment and Utopia and Thousand Oaks, CA
Architecture 1956–2006, Barbican Art Gallery, Azar, C., Holmberg, J. and Lingren K. (1996) ‘Socio-
London ecological indicators for sustainability’, Ecological
Amin, A. (2006) ‘The good city’, Urban Studies, vol 43, Economics, vol 18, pp89–112
nos 5/6, pp1009–1023 Baker, S. (2006) Sustainable Development, Routledge,
Amin, S. (2006) ‘The Millennium Development Goals: A London
critique from the South’, Monthly Review Press, vol Balakrishnan, U., Duvall, T. and Primeaux, P. (2003)
57, no 10, available at ‘Rewriting the bases of capitalism: Reflexive
www.monthlyreview.org/0306amin.htm, accessed modernity and ecological sustainability as the
10 June 2007 foundations of a new normative framework’,
Journal of Business Ethics, vol 47, pp299–314
252 Understanding Sustainable Development
Banerjee, S. B. (2003) ‘Who sustains whose develop- Environment and Modernity: Towards a New
ment? Sustainable development and the Ecology, Sage, London
reinvention of nature’, Organization Studies, vol Becker, J. (2005) ‘Measuring progress towards sustain-
24, no 1, pp143–180 able development: An ecological framework for
Banksy, R. (2005) Wall and Piece, Century Books, selecting indicators’, Local Environment, vol 10, no
London 1, pp87–101
Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy, University of Beder, S. (1997) Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on
California Press, Berkeley, CA Environmentalism, Green Books, Totnes, UK
Bardhan, P. (2002) ‘Decentralization of governance and Beder, S. (2002) ‘BP: Beyond Petroleum?’, in E. Lubbers
development’, The Journal of Economic (ed) Battling Big Business: Countering Greenwash,
Perspectives, vol 16, no 4, pp185–205 Infiltration and Other Forms of Corporate Bullying,
Barnett, J. (2001) The Meaning of Environmental Green Books, Totnes, UK
Security, Zed Books, London Beder, S. (2006) Suiting Themselves: How Corporations
Barry, J. (1999) Rethinking Green Politics, Sage, London Drive the Global Agenda, Earthscan, London
Bartlett, P. F. and Chase, G. W. (eds) (2004) Bell, S. and Morse, S. (1999) Sustainability Indicators:
Sustainability of Campus: Stories and Strategies Measuring the Immeasurable, Earthscan, London
for Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Bell, S. and Morse, S. (2003) Measuring Sustainability:
Barton, H. (ed) (2000) Sustainable Communities: The Learning By Doing, Earthscan, London
Potential for Eco-Neighbourhoods, Earthscan, Bello, W. (2002) ‘Future of global economic gover-
London nance’, in H. van Ginkel, B. Barrett, J. Court and J.
Batterbury, S. P. J. (2006) ‘Rescaling governance and Velasquez (eds) Human Development and the
the impacts of political and environmental decen- Environment: Challenges for the United Nations in
tralization: An introduction’, World Development, the New Millennium, United Nations University
vol 34, no 11, pp1851–1863 Press, Tokyo
Baud, I. and Dhanalakshmi, R. (2007) ‘Governance in Bello, W. (2004) Deglobalization: Ideas for a New
urban environmental management: Comparing World Economy, Zed Books, London
accountability and performance in multi-stake- Ben-Eli, M. (2007) ‘Defining sustainability’, Resurgence,
holder arrangements in South India’, Cities, no 244, pp12–14
vol 24, no 2, pp133–147 Benjamin, S. (2000) ‘Governance, economic settings
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (2004) ‘The urban transi- and poverty in Bangalore’, Environment and
tion: Research for the sustainable development of Urbanization, vol 12, no 1, pp35–56
the megacities of tomorrow’, Federal Ministry of Bennett, W. L. (2003) ‘Communicating global activism:
Education and Research, Berlin, available at Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics’,
www.uni-weimar.de/Bauing/ available at
abfallw/downloads/Megacities_long-paper.pdf http://depts.washington.edu/ccce/research/
Bayley, C. (2008) ‘Germany’s sunny revolution’, BBC WorkingPapers.htm
News, 10 January, available at Benyus, J. M. (2002) Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7181866.stm by Nature, Harper Perennial, New York
BBC News (2000) ‘BP goes green’, available at Berg, P. (1992) ‘A metamorphosis for cities: From gray
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/849475.stm to green’, available at
Beall, J., Crankshaw, O. and Parnell, S. (2000) ‘Local www.planetdrum.org/metamorphosis_for_
government, poverty reduction and inequality in cities.htm
Johannesburg’, Environment and Urbanization, vol Berg, P., Magilavy, B. and Zuckerman, S. (1989) Green
12, no 1, pp107–122 City Program for San Francisco Bay Area Cities and
Beatley, T. (2004) Native to Nowhere: Sustaining Home Towns, Planet Drum Foundation, San Francisco, CA
and Community in a Global Age, Island Press, Berkes, F. (2007) ‘Understanding uncertainty and
Washington, DC reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience
Beck, U. (1992a) Risk Society, Sage, London thinking’, Natural Hazards, vol 41, no 2,
Beck, U. (1992b) ‘From industrial society to the risk pp283–295
society: Questions of survival, social structure and Berry, W. (1990) The Dream of the Earth, Sierra Club
ecological enlightenment’, Theory, Culture and Books, San Francisco, CA
Society, vol 9, pp97–123 Best, S. (1998) ‘Murray Bookchin’s theory of social
Beck, U. (1996) ‘Risk society and the provident state’, ecology’, Organization and Environment, vol 11, no
in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) Risk, 3, pp334–353
References 253
Bestfoot Forward Ltd (2002) ‘City limits: A resource Bowers, C. A. (2003) Mindful Conservatism: Rethinking
flow and ecological footprint analysis of Greater the Ideological and Educational Basis of an
London’, available at www.citylimitslondon.com Ecologically Sustainable Future, Rowman and
BITC (2006) Looking Back, Moving Forward: Building Littlefield, Lanham, MD
the Business Case for Environmental Improvement, Bowman, S. and Willis, C. (2003) ‘We media’,
Business in the Community, London, available at available at www.hypergene.net/wemedia/
www.bitc.org.uk/resources/ weblog.php
publications/looking_back_moving.html BP (2006) ‘Human rights: A guidance note’, available
Black, R. (2007) ‘Humans blamed for climate change’, at www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/
BBC News, 2 February, available at globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6321351.stm BP_Human_Rights_2005.pdf
Blewitt, J. (2007) ‘Television for the environment: Brand, S. (1997) How Buildings Learn, Orion, London
Communicating for change’, Development Brand, S. (2005) ‘Environmental heresies’, Technology
Education Journal, vol 13, no 2, pp29–30 Review, vol 108, no 5, pp60–63, available at
Blewitt, J. (2006) The Ecology of Learning: www.technologyreview.com/
Sustainability, Lifelong Learning and Everyday Life, Energy/14406/
Earthscan, London Brandt, W. (1980) North–South: A Programme for
Blewitt, J. and Cullingford, C. (eds) (2004) The Survival, The Brandt Commission, Pan Books,
Sustainability Curriculum: The Challenge for London
Higher Education, Earthscan, London Bridger, J. C. and Luloff, A. E. (1999) ‘Toward an inter-
Bocking, S. (2007) ‘The silent spring of Al Gore’, actional approach to sustainable community
Alternatives Journal, vol 33, no 1, available at development’, Journal of Rural Studies, vol 15,
www.alternativesjournal.ca/index.php?option pp377–387
=com_content&task=view&id=284 Briggs, G. (2005) ‘The intelligent city: Ubiquitous
Bohm, D. (1996) On Dialogue, Routledge, London network or humane environment?’, in M. Jenks and
Bookchin, M. (1980) Toward an Ecological Society, N. Dempsey (eds) Future Forms and Design for
Black Rose Books, Montreal, Canada Sustainable Cities, Architectural Press, London
Bookchin, M. (1993) ‘What is social ecology?’, available Brown, L. R. (2001) Eco-Economy: Building an
at http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_ Economy for the Earth, Earthscan, London
Archives/bookchin/socecol.html Brown, L. R. (2006) Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet
Bookchin, M. (1995) From Urbanization to Cities, Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble, Norton,
Cassell, London New York, available at www.earth-
Bookchin, M. (2005) The Ecology of Freedom: The policy.org/Books/PB2/pb2ch12.pdf
Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy, AK Press, Brown, P. (2005) ‘Modified rape crosses with wild plant
Oakland, CA to create tough pesticide-resistant strain’, The
Bordiga, E., Sullivan, J. L., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M. S. Guardian, 25 July
and Riedel, E. (2002) ‘Civic culture meets the digital Bruce, I. (2004) The Porte Allegre Alternative: Direct
divide: The role of community electronic networks’, Democracy in Action, Pluto Press, London
Journal of Social Issues, vol 58, no 1, pp125–141 Brulle, R. (2000) Agency, Democracy and Nature: The
Borgmann, A. (1984) Technology and the Character of US Environmental Movement from a Critical
Contemporary Life, University of Chicago Press, Theory Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Chicago, IL Bryman, A. (1999) ‘The Disneyization of society’, The
Boulding, K. E. (1966) ‘The economics of the coming Sociological Review, vol 47, no 1, pp25–47
Spaceship Earth’, in H. Jarrett (ed) Environmental Buckman, G. (2004) Globalization: Tame it or Scrap it?,
Quality in a Growing Economy, John Hopkins Press, Zed Books, London
for Resources for the Future, Baltimore, MD Buell, L. (2001) Writing for an Endangered World,
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Bullard, R. D. and Johnson, G. S. (2000) ‘Environmental
Bowers, C. A. (1995) Educating for an Ecologically justice and its impact on public policy decision-
Sustainable Culture, State University of New York making’, Journal of Social Issues, vol 56, no 3,
Press, Albany, NY pp555–578
Bowers, C. A. (2001) Educating for Eco-Justice and Bullard, R. D. (ed) (2005) The Quest for Environmental
Community, University of Georgia Press, Athens, Justice: Human Rights and the Politics of Pollution,
GA Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, CA
254 Understanding Sustainable Development
Bunting, M. (2007) ‘Scientists have a new way to Mainstream and critical perspectives’, Organization
reshape nature, but none can predict the cost’, The and Environment, vol 17, no 2, pp195–225
Guardian, 22 October CEC (2000) ‘Communication from the Commission on
Burke, T. (2004) ‘This is neither scepticism nor science – the precautionary principle’, EU, Brussels
Just nonsense’, The Guardian, 23 October, available CEMR/ICLEI (Council of European Municipalities and
at www.guardian.co.uk/ Regions/Local Governments for Sustainability)
comment/story/0,3604,1334209,00.html (2004) Final Version of The Aalborg Commitments,
Burke, T. (2005) ‘Address to Green Alliance 25th available at
anniversary’, available at www.e3g.org/ www.aalborgplus10.dk/default.aspx?m=2&i=307
index.php/concept/concept-articles/address-to- Chambers, N., Simmons, C. and Wackernagel, M. (2000)
green-alliance-25th-anniversary/, accessed 25 July Sharing Nature’s Interest: Ecological Footprints as
2007 an Indicator of Sustainability, Earthscan, London
Cairns, J. Jr (2003) ‘Integrating top–down/ Chapman, J. (2005) Emotionally Durable Design:
bottom–up sustainability strategies: An ethical Objects, Experiences and Empathy, Earthscan,
challenge’, Ethics in Science and Environmental London
Politics, vol 3, www.int-res.com/articles/esep/ Cheney, J. (1989) ‘Postmodern environmental ethics:
2003/E26.pdf Ethics as bioregional narrative’, Environmental
Cairns, J. Jr (2004) ‘Future of life on Earth’, Ethics in Ethics, vol 11, no 2, pp117–134
Science and Environmental Politics, vol 4, www.int- Cheney, J. (1998) ‘Universal consideration: An episte-
res.com/articles/esep/2004/E41.pdf mological map of the terrain’, Environmental
Cajete, G. (ed) (1999) A People’s Ecology: Explorations Ethics, vol 20, fall, pp265–277
in Sustainable Living, Clear Light Publishers, Sante Chief Seattle (2000, original circa 1855) ‘How can one
Fe, NM sell the air? A Manifesto for the Earth’, in L. M.
Caldicott, H. (2006) Nuclear Power is Not the Answer, Benton and J. R. Short (eds) Environmental
The New Press, New York Discourse and Practice: A Reader, Blackwell,
Callenbach, E. (1975) Ecotopia, Banyan Tree Books, Oxford, UK
Berkeley, CA Christian Aid (2004) Behind the Mask: The Real Face of
Calthorpe, P. (1993) The Next American Metropolis: Corporate Social Responsibility, Christian Aid,
Ecology, Community and the American Dream, London, available at
Princeton Architectural Press, New York www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/tncs/2004/
Campbell, B. (2000) ‘Stand up for cheese power’, 0121mask.pdf
Independent on Sunday, 6 August, available at Christoff, P. (1996) ‘Ecological modernization, ecologi-
www.independent.co.uk/opinion/ cal modernities’, Environmental Politics, vol 5, no 3
commentators/beatrix-campbell-stand-up-for- pp476–500
cheese-power-696718.html Clapp, J. and Dauvergne, P. (2005) Paths to a Green
Campbell, J. (1993) The Hero with a Thousand Faces, World: The Political Economy of the Global
Paladin, London Environment, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Capra, F. (1991) The Tao of Physics, third edition, Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) ‘A stakeholder framework for
Flamingo, London analysing and evaluating corporate social perform-
Capra, F. (1996) The Web of Life, Anchor Books, London ance’, Academy of Management Review, vol 20, no
Capra, F. (2002) Hidden Connections, Flamingo, London 1, pp92–117
CARMA (2006) ‘Western media coverage of humani- Clayton, T. and Radcliffe, N. (1996) Sustainability: A
tarian disasters’, available at Systems Approach, Earthscan, London
www.carma.com/research/ Cockcroft, E., Weber, J. P. and Cockcroft, J. (1998)
Carnap, R. (1966) Philosophical Foundation of Physics, Toward a People’s Art: The Contemporary Mural
Basic Books, New York Movement, University of New Mexico Press,
Carson, R. (2000, original 1962) Silent Spring, Penguin Albuquerque, NM
Books, London Coile, Z. (2007) ‘Schwarzenegger’s guiltless green: He
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society touts keeping muscle cars, but filling up on
(three volumes), Blackwell, Oxford, UK biofuel’, San Francisco Chronicle, 12 April, available
Castells, M. and Hall, P. (1994) Technopoles of the at www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/
World: The Making of 21st-Century Industrial c/a/2007/04/12/MNG6FP74D61.DTL
Complexes, Routledge, London and New York Coleman, J. A. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory,
Castro, C. J. (2004) ‘Sustainable development: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
References 255
Collin, R. M. and Collin, R. (2005) ‘Environmental Cuomo, C. J. (1992) ‘Unravelling the problems in
reparations’, in R. D. Bullard (ed) The Quest for ecofeminism’, Environmental Ethics, vol 14,
Environmental Justice: Human Rights and the pp351–363
Politics of Pollution. Sierra Club Books, San Daily, G. C. (1997) Nature’s Services: Societal
Francisco, CA Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press,
Collins, J., Thomas, G., Willis, R. and Wilsdon, J. (2003) Washington, DC
‘Carrots, sticks and sermons: Influencing public Daily, G. C. and Ellison, K. (2003) The New Economy of
behaviour for environmental goals’, Demos/Green Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation
Alliance report produced for Defra, available at Profitable, Shearwater Books, Covelo, CA
www.green-alliance.org.uk Dale, S. (1996) McLuhan’s Children: The Greenpeace
Collins, J. C. and Porras, J. I. (1994) Built to Last: Message and the Media, Between the Lines,
Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, Toronto, Canada
HarperBusiness, New York Dale, A. (2001) At the Edge, UBC Press, Vancouver,
Congress for the New Urbanism (2000) Charter for Canada
New Urbanism, CNU, Chicago, IL, available at Daley, B. (2005) ‘Eco products in demand, but labels
www.cnu.org/charter can be murky’, Boston Globe, 9 February,
Connell, J. B. (1990) Sharing Nature With Children www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/02/
(20th anniversary edition), Dawn Publications, 09/eco_products_in_demand_but_labels_can_
Nevada City, CA be_murky/
Connelly, J. and Smith, G. (1999) Politics and the Dalton, H. (2004) ‘The science of GM agriculture’, The
Environment: From Theory to Practice, Routledge, Journal of the Foundation for Science and
London Technology, vol 18, no 3, pp9–11
Cook, D. (2004) The Natural Step: A Framework for Daly, H. E. and Cobb, J. (1989) For the Common Good,
Sustainability, Schumacher Briefings, Green Books, Beacon Press, Boston, MA
Totnes, UK Daly, H. E. (1996) Beyond Growth: The Economics of
Cook, I. (2000) ‘Social sculpture and connective Sustainable Development, Beacon Press, Boston,
aesthetics: Shelley Sacks’s “exchange values”’, MA
Ecumene, vol 7, no 3, pp337–343 Daly, H. E. (1999) ‘Uneconomic growth in theory and in
Cook, I. (2004) ‘Follow the thing: Papaya’, Antipode, vol fact’, First Annual Feasta Lecture, Dublin, available
36, no 4, pp642–664 at www.feasta.org/documents/
Corcoran, P. B. and Wals, A. E. J. (eds) (2004) Higher feastareview/daly1.pdf
Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Daly, H. E. (2002) ‘Reconciling the economics of social
Problematics, Promise and Practice, Kluwer equity and environmental sustainability’,
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands Population and Environment, vol 24, no 1, pp47–53
Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (eds) (2003) Contesting Daly, H. E. (2007) ‘What is the question?’, Resurgence,
Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked vol 244, pp18–19
World, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD Dasgupta, P. (2001) Human Wellbeing and the Natural
Coyle, D. (ed) (2005) ‘Africa: The impact of mobile Environment, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
phones’, Vodaphone Policy Paper No 3, available at Datschefski, E. (2001) The Total Beauty of Sustainable
www.vodafone.com/etc/medialib/ Products, RotoVision, Hove, UK
attachments/cr_downloads.Par.78351.File.dat/ Davis, L. S. (2007) ‘Click here to create a better world’,
GPP_SIM_paper_3.pdf On Earth, spring, available at
Crawford, J. H. (2000) Carfree Cities, International www.nrdc.org/onearth/07spr/livgreen.asp
Books, Utrecht Davis, M. (2006) Planet of Slums, Verso, London
Cronon, W. (1983) Changes in the Land: Indians, Davison, A. (2001) Technology and the Contested
Colonists and the Ecology of New England, Hill and Meaning of Sustainability, State University of New
Wang, New York York Press, Albany, NY
Crowther, D., Greene, A-M. and Hosking, D. A. (2002) Davison, A. (2004) ‘Reinhabiting technology: Ends in
‘Local economic trading schemes and their implica- means and the practice of place’, Technology in
tions for marketing assumptions, concepts and Society, vol 26, pp85–97
practices’, Management Decision, vol 40, no 4, Dawson, J. (2006) Ecovillages: New Frontiers for
pp352–362 Sustainability, Green Books, Totnes, UK
Cuilla, J. B. (2003) The Ethics of Leadership, Day, P. and Schuler, D. (2006) ‘Community practice in
Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA the network society: Pathways towards civic intelli-
256 Understanding Sustainable Development
gence’, in P. Purcell (ed) Networked Dobson, A. (1998) Justice and the Environment:
Neighbourhoods: The Connected Community in Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and
Context, Springer-Verlag, London Dimensions of Social Justice, Oxford University
Deakin, R. (2007) Wildwood: A Journey through Trees, Press, Oxford, UK
Hamish Hamilton, London Dobson, A. (2003a) ‘Social justice and environmental
Dean, A. O. and Hursley, T. (2002) Rural Studio: Samuel sustainability: Ne’er the twain shall meet?’, in J.
Mockbee and an Architecture of Decency, Agyeman, R. D. Bullard and B. Evans (eds) Just
Princeton Architectural Press, New York Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal
Defra (2005a) Securing the Future: Delivering UK World, Earthscan, London
Sustainable Development Policy, HMSO, London, Dobson, A. (2003b) Citizenship and the Environment,
www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/ Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
publications/uk-strategy/uk-strategy-2005.htm Doppelt, B. (2000) ‘Overcoming the seven sustainabil-
Defra (2005b) Sustainable Development Indicators in ity blunders’, The Systems Thinker, vol 14, no 5,
Your Pocket, HMSO, London, available at available at www.greenleaf-publishing.com/
www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/ content/pdfs/systhink.pdf
performance/indicatorsindex.htm Doppelt, B. (2003) Leading Change Towards
De Gues, A. (1997) ‘The living company’, Harvard Sustainability, Greenleaf, Sheffield, UK
Business Review, March–April, pp51–59 Douthwaite, R. (1999a) ‘The ecology of money’, avail-
de Geus, M. (1999) Ecological Utopias: Envisioning the able at www.feasta.org/documents/
Sustainable Society, International Books, Utrecht, moneyecology/intro.htm
The Netherlands Douthwaite, R. (1999b) The Growth Illusion, Green
Deloria, V. Jr, Deloria, B., Foehner, K. and Scinta, S. (eds) Books, Totnes, UK
(1999) Spirit and Reason: The Vine Deloria Jr Doyle, T. and McEachern, D. (1998) Environment and
Reader, Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, CO Politics, Routledge, London
DeLuca, K. M. (1999) Image Politics: The New Rhetoric Draper, S. (2006) ‘Key models for delivering sector-
of Environmental Activism, Lawrence Erlbaum, level corporate responsibility’, Corporate
Mahwah, NJ Governance, vol 6, no 4, pp409–419
de Jong, W., Shaw, M. and Stammers, N. (eds) (2005) Drayton, W. (2003) ‘Social entrepreneurs: Creating a
Global Activism, Global Media, Pluto Press, London competitive and entrepreneurial citizen sector’,
Devall, B. and Sessions, G. (1985) Deep Ecology: Living available at www.changemakers.net/library/
as if Nature Mattered, Gibbs M. Smith, Salt Lake readings/drayton.cfm, accessed 1 June 2006
City, UT Dryzek, J. S. (1996) ‘Strategies of ecological modern-
Devas, N. (2004) Urban Governance, Voice and Poverty ization’, in W. M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft (eds)
in the Developing World, Earthscan, London Democracy and the Environment: Problems and
Dewey, J. (1927) The Public and its Problems, Henry Prospects, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Holt & Co, New York Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and
DfES (Department for Education and Skills) (2006) Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford
‘Sustainable schools: For pupils, communities and University Press, Oxford, UK
the environment’, available at Dunbar, R. (1995) The Trouble with Science, Faber and
www.publications.teachernet.gov.uk/ Faber, London
eOrderingDownload/0481-2006PDF-EN-01.pdf Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A. and Benn, S. (2003)
Diamond, J. (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Organizational Change for Corporate
Fail or Survive, Penguin, London Sustainability, Routledge, London
Dinham, B. and Sarangi, S. (2002) ‘The Bhopal gas Durham, P. (1992) The Aim and Structure of Physical
tragedy 1984 to? The evasion of corporate respon- Theory, translated by P. Wiener, Princeton
sibility’, Environment and Urbanization, vol 14, no University Press. Princeton, NJ
1, pp89–99 Durning, A. T. (1992) How Much is Enough? The
Distaso, A. (2007) ‘Wellbeing and/or quality of life in Consumer Society and the Future of the Earth,
EU countries through a multidimensional index of Earthscan, London
sustainability’, Ecological Economics, vol 64, Dyer, A (2007) ‘Inspiration, enchantment and a sense
pp163–180 of wonder … Can a new paradigm in education
Doane, D. (2005) ‘Beyond corporate social responsibil- bring nature and culture together again?’,
ity: Minnows, mammoths and markets’, Futures, vol International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol 13,
37 pp215–229 no 4, pp393–404
References 257
Earley, P. C. and Mosakowski, E. (2004) ‘Cultural intelli- ‘Environmental justice: Rights and means to a
gence’, Harvard Business Review, October, healthy environment for all’, Special Briefing
pp139–146 (University of Sussex), no 7, available at
East, R. (2007) ‘Holding out for a hero: Green leaders www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/
for 2008’, Daily Telegraph, 28 December 2007, environmental_justice.pdf
available at www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/ Fairlie, S. (1996) Low Impact Development: Planning
main.jhtml?view=DETAILSandgrid=andxml=/ and People in the Countryside, JCP, Charlbury, UK
earth/2007/12/28/eafutures128.xml Fichtner, U. (2007) ‘The road from protest to profes-
Eckersley, R. (2004) The Green State: Rethinking sionalism’, Spiegel Online, 30 January 2007,
Democracy and Sovereignty, MIT Press, Cambridge, available at www.spiegel.de/international/
MA spiegel/0,1518,463076,00.html
Eckersley, R. (2005) ‘Ecocentric discourses: Problems Fishman, R. (1982) Urban Utopias in the Twentieth
and future prospects for nature advocacy’, Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
in J. S. Dryzek and D. Schlosberg (eds) Debating the Fixico, D. L. (2003) The American Indian Mind in a
Earth: The Environmental Politics Reader, Oxford Linear World, Routledge, New York
University Press, Oxford, UK Flannery, T. (2005) The Weather Makers, Penguin
The Ecologist (1993) Whose Common Future? Books, London
Reclaiming the Commons, New Society Publishers Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy
Philadelphia, PA in Practice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Egoyan, A. (2002) ‘Janet Cardiff’, Bomb, no 79, Folke, C., Colding, J. and Berkes, F. (2003) ‘Building
pp60–67 resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecologi-
Egri, C. P. and Herman, S. (2000) ‘Leadership in the cal systems’, in F. Berkes, J. Colding and C. Folke
North American environmental sector: Values, (eds) Navigating Social–Ecological Systems,
leadership styles, and contexts of environmental Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK,
leaders and their organizations’, The Academy of pp352–387
Management Journal, vol 43, no 4, pp571–604 Forum for the Future (2007) ‘The sustainable cities
Ekins, P. (2000) Economic Growth and Environmental index’, Forum for the Future, London, available at
Sustainability: The Prospects for Green Growth, www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/files/
Routledge, London sustainablecities07.pdf
Eliasoph, N. (1990) ‘Political culture and the presenta- Foster, J. B. (1999) ‘Marx’s theory of metabolic rift:
tion of a political “self”’, Theory and Society, vol 19, Classical foundations for environmental sociology’,
no 4, pp465–94 American Journal of Sociology, vol 105, no 2,
Eliasoph, N. (1998) Avoiding Politics: How Americans pp366–405
Produce Apathy in Everyday Life, Cambridge Foster, J. B. (2000) Marx’s Ecology Materialism and
University Press, New York Nature, Monthly Review Press, New York
Eliasoph, N. and Lichterman, P. (2003) ‘Culture in inter- Foster, J. B. (2002) Ecology Against Capitalism,
action’, American Journal of Sociology, vol 108, no Monthly Review Press, New York
4, pp735–794 Frank, R. (1999) Luxury Fever: Money and Happiness in
Ereaut, G. and Segnit, N. (2006) Warm Words: How are an Era of Excess, Princeton University Press,
We Telling the Climate Story and Can We Tell It Princeton, NJ
Better?, Institute of Public Policy Research, London Freire, P. (1996) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Penguin,
Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering Development: The London
Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Friedmann, J. (1992) Empowerment: The Politics of
Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Alternative Development, Blackwell, Oxford, UK
Escobar, A. (2006a) ‘Difference and conflict in the Fuchs, R. J., Brennan, E., Chamie, J., Lo, F-C. and Uitto, J.
struggle over natural resources: A political ecology I. (eds) (1994) Mega-City Growth and the Future,
framework’, Development, vol 49, no 3, pp6–13 United Nations University Press, Tokyo
Escobar, A. (2006b) ‘Places and regions in the age of Fukuda-Parr, S. (2002) Human Development Report,
globality: Social movements and biodiversity 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented
conservation in the Colombian Pacific’, manuscript World, Oxford University Press for the UNDP, New
accepted for publication by Duke University Press, York, available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/
Durham, NC media/hdr_2002_en_complete.pdf
ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council) Global Fukuda-Parr, S. (2004) Human Development Report,
Environmental Change Programme (2001) 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World,
258 Understanding Sustainable Development
Guha, R. (1989) ‘Radical American environmentalism Hart, S. L. (1997) ‘Beyond greening: Strategies for a
and “wilderness” preservation: A Third World sustainable world’, Harvard Business Review, vol
critique’, Environmental Ethics, vol 11, no 1, 75, no 1, pp66–76
pp71–83 Hart, S. L. (2005) Capitalism at the Crossroads: The
Guha, R. (2000) The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the
Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya, World’s Problems, Wharton School Publishing,
University of California Press, Berkeley, CA Upper Saddle River, NJ
Guha, R. (2006) How Much Should a Person Consume? Haughton, G. (1999) ‘Environmental justice and the
Environmentalism in India and the United States, sustainable city’, Journal of Planning Education
University of California Press, Berkeley, CA and Research, vol 18, no 3, pp233–243
Gundersen, A. (1995) The Environmental Promise of Hawken, P. (1994) The Ecology of Commerce, Harper
Democratic Deliberation, University of Wisconsin Business, New York
Press, Madison, WI Hawken, P. (2007) Blessed Unrest, Viking, New York
Hall, P. (1996) Cities of Tomorrow, Blackwell, Oxford, Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B. and Lovins L. H. (1999) Natural
UK Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution,
Halleck, D. (2002) Hand-Held Visions: The Impossible Earthscan, London
Possibilities of Community Media, Fordham Hayden, D. (1997) The Power of Place: Urban
University Press, New York Landscapes as Public History, MIT Press,
Halpern, R. (1995) Rebuilding the Inner City, Columbia Cambridge, MA
University Press, New York Heal, G. (2000) Nature and the Market Place:
Hamilton, C. (1999) ‘The genuine progress indicator: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services, Island
Methodological developments and results from Press, Washington, DC
Australia’, Ecological Economics, vol 30, pp13–28 Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping
Hamilton, C. (2003) Growth Fetish, Pluto Press, London Places in Fragmented Societies, Macmillan, London
Hampton, K. and Wellman, B. (2003) ‘Neighbouring in Heifetz, R. A. (1994) Leadership without Easy Answers,
Netville: How the internet supports community Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
and social capital in a wired suburb’, City and Heifetz, R. (1999) ‘Change: What’s essential and what’s
Community, vol 2, no 4, pp277–311 expendable?’, interview for the Society for
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Russell, G., Lea, D. W. Organizational Learning, available at www.dialo-
and Siddall, M. (2007) ‘Climate change and trace gonleadership.org/
gases’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal interviewHeifetz.html
Society A, vol 365, pp1925–1954 Heinberg, R. (2004) Powerdown: Options and Action
Hardi, P. and DeSouza-Huletey, J. A. (2000) ‘Issues in for a Post-Carbon World, New Society Publishers,
analysing data and indicators for sustainable Washington, DC
development’, Ecological Modelling, vol 130, Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (eds)
pp59–65 (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics
Hardin, G. (1968) ‘The tragedy of the commons’, and Culture, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
Science, vol 162, no 3859, pp1243–1248, available Henriques, A. and Richardson, J. (eds) (2004) The Triple
at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/ Bottom Line, Earthscan, London
full/162/3859/1243 Hester, L. and Cheney, J. (2001) ‘Truth and Native
Harding, S. (2006) Animate Earth: Science, Intuition American epistemology’, Social Epistemology, vol
and Gaia, Green Books, Totnes 15, no 4, pp319–334
Hardoy, J. E., Mitlin, D. and Satterthwaite, D. (2001) Hines, C. (2000) Localization: A Global Manifesto,
Environmental Problems in an Urbanizing World, Earthscan, London
Earthscan, London Hitchcock, D. and Willard, M. (2006) The Business
Hardy, D. (2006) Poundbury: The Town that Charles Guide to Sustainability: Practical Strategy and
Built, Town and Country Planning Association, Tools for Organizations, Earthscan, London
London Ho, M-W. (1998) Genetic Engineering: Dream or
Harre, R. (1984) Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Nightmare?, Gateway, Dublin
Psychology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Hoffman, A. J. (2003 ‘Linking social systems analysis to
MA the industrial ecology framework’, Organization
Harris, K. (2003) ‘Keep your distance: Remote commu- and Environment, vol 16, no 1, pp66–86
nication, face-to-face and the nature of Hoggett, P. (2001) ‘Democracy, social relations and
community’, Journal of Community Work and eco-welfare’, Social Policy and Administration, vol
Development, vol 1, no 4, pp5–28 35, no 5, pp608–626
260 Understanding Sustainable Development
Holling, C. S. (2001) ‘Understanding the complexity of (2004) ‘Sixteen years of scientific assessment in
economic, ecological and social systems’, support of the Climate Convention’, WMO/UNEP,
Ecosystems, vol 4, pp390–405 available at www.ipcc.ch/about/anniversary-
Holling, C. S. (2004) ‘From complex regions to complex brochure.pdf
worlds’, Ecology and Society, vol 9, no 1, IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation,
www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art11/ Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth
Holmberg, J. and Robèrt, K-H. (2000) ‘Backcasting from Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
non-overlapping sustainability principles – A on Climate Change, edited by B. Metz, O. R.
framework for strategic planning’, International Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave and L. A. Meyer,
Journal of Sustainable Development and World Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, avail-
Ecology, vol 7, pp291–308 able at www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg3.htm
Holme, R. and Watts, P. (2000) ‘Corporate social Isaacs, W. (1999) Dialogue and the Art of Thinking
responsibility: Making good business sense’, World Together, Doubleday, New York
Business Council for Sustainable Development, Isaak, R. (2002) ‘The making of the ecopreneur’,
available at www.wbcsd.ch Greener Management International, vol 38,
Homer-Dixon, T. (1999) Environment, Scarcity and pp81–91
Violence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ IUCN (2007) ‘Gender aspects of climate change’, avail-
Homer-Dixon, T. (2002) The Ingenuity Gap, Vintage able at www.iucn.org/en/news/archive/
Books, New York 2007/03/7_gender_climate_change.pdf, accessed
Homer-Dixon, T. (2006) The Upside of Down: 14 June 2007
Catastrophe, Creativity and the Renewal of Jackson, T. and Marks, N. (1998) ‘Consumption,
Civilization, Souvenir Press, London sustainable welfare and human needs – With refer-
Hopkins, M. (1999) The Planetary Bargain: Corporate ence to UK expenditure patterns between 1954
Social Responsibility Comes of Age, Macmillan, and 1994’, Ecological Economics, vol 28,
London pp421–441
Hopkins, M. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility and Jackson, T. (2005) Motivating Sustainable
International Development: Is Business the Consumption, ESRC Sustainable Technologies
Solution?, Earthscan, London Programme, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK,
Hopkins, R. (2005) ‘Designing energy descent pathways available at www.compassnetwork.org/
– One community’s attempt at designing a images/upload/MotivatingSCfinal.pdf
prosperous way down from the peak’, Permaculture Jamison, A. (2001) The Making of Green Knowledge:
Magazine, no 45, available at http://transitioncul- Environmental Politics and Cultural
ture.org/articles/ Transformation, Cambridge University Press,
designing-energy-descent-pathways-2005/ Cambridge, UK
Horton, D. (2004) ‘Local environmentalism and the Jamison, A. (2003) ‘The making of green knowledge:
internet’, Environmental Politics, vol 13, no 4, The contribution from activism’, Futures, vol 35,
pp734–753 pp703–716
Hough, M. (1995) Cities and Natural Process, Jencks, C. (1987) Le Corbusier and the Tragic View of
Routledge, London Architecture, Penguin, London
Howard, E. (1902) Garden Cities of Tomorrow, Swan Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and
Sonnenschein, London New Media Collide, New York University Press, New
Hunt, G. and Mehta, M. Eds (2006) Nanotechnology: York
Risk, Ethics and Law, Earthscan, London Jenkins, H. (2007) Confronting the Challenges of
Hutchby, I. (2001) ‘Technologies, texts and affor- Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st
dances’, Sociology, vol 35, no 2, pp441–456 Century, The MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL,
Ihde, D. (1997) ‘Whole Earth measurements: How available at
many phenomenologists does it take to detect a www.digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/
“greenhouse effect”?’, Philosophy Today, vol 41, no %7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0
1, pp128–134 AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF
Ingalsbee, T. (1996) ‘Earth First! activism: Ecological Jenkins, R. (2005) ‘Globalization, corporate social
postmodern praxis in radical environmentalist responsibility and poverty’, International Affairs,
identities’, Sociological Perspectives, vol 39, no 2, vol 81, no 3, pp525–540
pp263–276 Jenks, M., Burton, E. and Williams, K. (eds) (1996) The
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, Spon,
References 261
Communities Count! A Step by Step Guide to tion’, in T. Princen, M. Maniates and K. Conca (eds)
Community Sustainability Indicators, New (2002) Confronting Consumption, MIT Press,
Economics Foundation, London Cambridge, MA
McGinnis, M. V. (1999) Bioregionalism, Routledge, Manzini, E. and Jegou, F. (2003) Sustainable Everyday:
London Scenarios of Urban Life, Edizioni Ambiente, Milan,
McIntosh, A. (1997) ‘Colonised land, colonised mind’, Italy
Resurgence, no 184, pp28–30 Manzini, E (2004) ‘Scenarios of sustainable ways of
McIntosh, A. (2004) Soil and Soul: People versus living: Local and global visions’, available at
Corporate Power, Aurum Press, London www.sustainable-everyday.net
McKenna, P. (2007) ‘Renewable energy could “rape” Manzini, E. (2005) ‘Enabling solutions: Social innova-
nature’, New Scientist, 25 July, available at tion, creative communities and strategic design’,
http://environment.newscientist.com/ available at www.sustainable-everyday.net
article.ns?id=dn12346andprint=true, accessed 24 Marks, K. (2007) ‘Aboriginal health “a hundred years
July 2007 behind whites”’, The Independent, 2 May,
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000) ‘Promoting sustainable available at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/
behaviour: An introduction to community-based mi_qn4158/is_20070502/ai_n19048445
social marketing’, Journal of Social Issues, vol 56, Marten, G. G. (2001) Human Ecology: Basic Concepts
no 3, pp543–554 for Sustainable Development, Earthscan, London
McKibben, B. (2003) Enough: Staying Human in an Martinez-Alier, J. (2002) The Environmentalism of the
Engineered Age, Owl Books, New York Poor. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
McLaren, D., Bullock, S. and Yousuf, N. (1998) Massey, D. (1993) ‘Power-geometry and a progressive
Tomorrow’s World: Britain’s Share in a Sustainable sense of space’, in J. Bird, B. Curtis, B. Putnam, G.
Future, Eathscan/Friends of the Earth, London Robertson and L. Tickner (eds) Mapping the
McLaren, D. (2001) ‘Sustainable Europe and environ- Futures: Local Cultures, Global Changes, Routledge,
mental space – Achieving sustainability through London
the concept of “environmental space”: A trans- Max-Neef, M. (1991) Human-Scale Development:
European project’, available at Conception, Application and Further Reflection,
www.foe.co.uk/resource/articles/sustain_ Apex Press, London
europe_env_space.html Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society, Chicago
McLaren, D. (2003) ‘Environmental space, equity and University Press, Chicago, IL
ecological debt’, in J. Agyeman, R. D. Bullard and B. Meadows, D., Randers, J. and Meadows, D. (2005)
Evans (eds) Just Sustainabilities: Development in Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update, Earthscan,
an Unequal World, Earthscan, London London
McLennan, J. F. (2004) The Philosophy of Sustainable Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and
Design, Ecotone, Kansas City, MO Behrens, W. W. III (1972) The Limits to Growth: A
McMahon, S. K. (2002) ‘The development of quality of Report to The Club of Rome, Universe Books, New
life indicators – Study from the City of Bristol, UK’, York, available at www.clubofrome.org/
Ecological Indicators, vol 2, pp177–185 archive/reports.php
McManus, P. and Haughton, G. (2006) ‘Planning with Mellahi, K and Wood, G. (2002) The Ethical Business:
ecological footprints: A sympathetic critique of Challenges and Controversies, Palgrave,
theory and practice’, Environment and Basingstoke, UK
Urbanization, vol 18, no 1, pp113–127 Merchant, C. (1989) Ecological Revolutions: Nature,
Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J. (1998) Contested Natures, Gender and Science in New England, University of
Sage, London North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC
Magnusson, W. and Shaw, K. (eds) (2002) A Political Meyer, A. (2000) Contraction and Convergence: The
Space: Reading the Global through Clayoquot Global Solution to Climate Change, Green Books,
Sound, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, Totnes, UK
Canada Mezirow, J. (1991) Transformative Dimensions of Adult
Maniates, M. (2002) ‘Individualization: Plant a tree, buy Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
a bike, save the world?’, in T. Princen, M. Maniates Micklethwaite, P. and Chick, A. (2005) ‘Remarkable
and K. Conca (eds) (2002) Confronting Pencils Ltd: Breaking out of the green niche’,
Consumption, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Design Management Review, vol 16, no 3, pp23–28
Manno, J. (2002) ‘Commoditization: Consumption Middleton, J. (2007) Beyond Authority: Leadership in a
efficiency and an economy of care and connec- Changing World, Palgrave/Macmillan, London
264 Understanding Sustainable Development
Mihata, K. (1997) ‘The persistence of “emergence”’, in skills for a changing world: Solving complex social
R. A. Eve, S. Horsfall and M. E. Lee (eds) Chaos, problems’, Leadership Quarterly, vol 11,
Complexity and Sociology: Myths, Models and no 1, pp11–35
Theories, Sage, London Naess, A. (1973) ‘The shallow and the deep, long-range
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems ecology movement’, Inquiry, no 16, pp95–100
and Human Wellbeing: Policy Responses, Volume 3, Naess, A. (1995) ‘The Deep Ecology Movement: Some
Island Press, Washington, DC, available at philosophical aspects’, in G. Sessions (ed) Deep
www.maweb.org/documents/ Ecology for the 21st Century, Shambhala, London
document.769.aspx.pdf Nattrass, B. and Altomare, M. (1999) The Natural Step
Mills, W. I. (1998) ‘Identity, power and place at the for Business: Wealth, Ecology and the Evolutionary
periphery’, Development, vol 41, no 2, pp38–43 Corporation, New Society Publishers, Gabriola
Mirvis, P. and Coocins, B. (2004) ‘The best of the good’, Island, Canada
Harvard Business Review, vol 82, no 12, pp21–22 The Natural Step (2000) The Natural Step Framework
Mitchell, G. and Walker, G. (2003) ‘Environmental Guidebook, available at
quality and social deprivation’, R&D Technical www.naturalstep.ca/resources.html
Report E2-067/1/TR, The Environment Agency, Neate, P. and Platt, D. (2006) Culture Is Our Weapon:
Bristol, UK AfroReggae in the Favelas of Rio, Latin American
Mitchell, W. J. (1996) City of Bits, MIT Press, Bureau, London
Cambridge, MA Neidjie, B. (1986) Australia’s Kakadu Man, Resource
Mitchell, W. J. (2000) E-topia: Urban Life, Jim – But Managers, Darwin, Australia
Not As We Know It, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Nelson, R. K. (1986) Make Prayers to the Raven: A
Mitchell, W. J. (2003) Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Koyukon View of the Northern Forest, Chicago
Networked City, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA University Press, Chicago, IL
Mitlin, D. and Satterthwaite, D. (eds) (2004) Newman, P. (2006) ‘The environmental impact of
Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, cities’, Environment and Urbanization, vol 18, no 2,
Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction, pp275–295
IIED/Earthscan, London Neuwirth, R. (2006) Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters,
Mol, A. P. J. and Spaargaren, G. (2000) ‘Ecological a New Urban World, Routledge, London
modernization theory in debate’, in A. P. J. Mol and Nicholls, A. J. (2002) ‘Strategic options in fair trade
D. A. Sonnenfeld (eds) Ecological Modernization retailing’, International Journal of Retail and
Around the World: Perspectives and Critical Distribution Management, vol 30, no 1, pp6–17
Debates, Frank Cass, London Nonaka, I. and Toyama, R. (2004) ‘Knowledge creation
Monbiot, G. (2003) ‘World [fair] Trade Organization’, as a synthesizing process’, in H. Takeuchi and I.
The Ecologist, available at www.theecologist.org/ Nonaka (eds) Hitotsubashi on Knowledge
archive_detail.asp?content_id=360 Management, John Wiley and Sons (Asia),
Monbiot, G. (2004) The Age of Consent, Singapore
HarperPerennial, London Norberg-Hodge, H. (2000) Ancient Futures: Learning
Monbiot, G. (2006) Heat: How to Stop the Planet from Ladakh, Rider Books, London
Burning, Penguin Books, London Nordstrom, C. (2007) Global Outlaws: Crime, Money,
Montague, P. (2004) ‘Answering the critics of precau- and Power in the Contemporary World, California
tion, Part 1’, Rachel’s Environment and Health University Press, Berkeley, CA
News, no 789, 15 April, available at Norgaard, R. B. (1994) Development Betrayed: the End
www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?St=4 of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of
Morphy, H. (1998) Aboriginal Art, Phaidon Press, the Future, Routledge, London
London Northouse, P. G. (2007) Leadership: Theory and
Mumford, L (1962, original 1934) Technics and Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Civilization, Harcourt Brace, New York Norton, B. G. (2005) Sustainability: A Philosophy of
Mumford, L (1966a, original 1938) The Culture of Adaptive Ecosystem Management, Chicago
Cities, Harcourt Brace, New York University Press, Chicago, IL
Mumford, L. (1966b) The City in History: Its Origins, its O’Byrne, D. J. (2003) The Dimensions of Global
Transformations and its Prospects, Penguin Books, Citizenship: Political Identity Beyond the Nation-
Harmondsworth, UK State, Frank Cass Publishers, London
Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Owen O’Riordan, T. (1996) ‘Democracy and the sustainability
Jacobs, T. and Fleishman, E. A. (2000) ‘Leadership transition’, in W. M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft
References 265
(eds) Democracy and the Environment: Problems Conditionality transformed?’, Third World
and Prospects, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK Quarterly, vol 22, no 3, pp397–411
O’Riordan, T. and Cameron, J. (1994) Interpreting the Pepper, D. (2005) ‘Utopianism and environmentalism’,
Precautionary Principle, Earthscan, London Environmental Politics, vol 14, no 1, pp3–22
O’Riordan, T. and Voisey, H. (1998) ‘The politics of Pereira, M. A., Kartashov, A. I., Ebbeling, C. B., van Horn,
Agenda 21’, in T. O’Riordan and H. Voisey (eds) The L., Slattery, M. L., Jacobs, D. R. Jr and Ludwig, D. S.
Transition to Sustainability: The Politics of Agenda (2005) ‘Fast-food habits, weight gain and insulin
21 in Europe, Earthscan, London resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective
Orr, D. (1992) Ecological Literacy, Education and the analysis’, The Lancet, vol 365, no 9453, pp36–42
Transition to a Postmodern World, State Peretti, J. (2003) ‘Culture jamming, memes, social
Universities of New York Press, Albany, NY networks and the emerging media ecology: The
Orr, D. (1994) Earth in Mind, Island Press, Washington, “Nike sweatshop email” as object-to-think-with’,
DC available at http://depts.washington.edu/
Oxfam (2002) Rigged Rules and Double Standards: ccce/polcommcampaigns/peretti.html
Trade, Globalization and the Fight Against Poverty, Perlman, J. E. (2000) ‘Innovative solutions create urban
Oxfam, Oxford, UK, available at www.maketrade- sustainability’, Global Issues, vol 5, no 1, available
fair.com/assets/english/report_english.pdf at http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itgic/0300/
Oxfam (2007) ‘Increased ethical concerns leave UK ijge/gj-04a.htm
public unhappy with supermarket shopping’, press Perri 6 (1997) Holistic Government, Demos, London
release, 2 March, available at Pezzoli, K. (1997) ‘Sustainable development: A trans-
www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/pressoffice/ disciplinary overview of the literature’, Journal of
2007/03/increased_ethical_concerns_lea.html Environmental Planning and Management, vol 40,
Pal, A. (2006) ‘Scope for bottom–up planning in no 5, pp549–574
Kolkata: Rhetoric vs. reality’, Environment and Pezzoli, K. (2000) Human Settlements and Planning for
Urbanization, vol 18, no 2, pp501–521 Ecological Sustainability: The Case of Mexico City,
Palacios, J. J. (2004) ‘Corporate citizenship and social MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
responsibility in a globalized world’, Citizenship Phillips, B. J. and McQuarrie, E. F. (2004) ‘Beyond visual
Studies, vol 8, no 4, pp383–402 metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in
Palmer, J. A. (1998) Environmental Education in the advertising’, Marketing Theory, vol 4, nos 1/2,
21st Century, Routledge, London pp113–136
Parks, L. (2005) Cultures in Orbit: Satellites and the Pierre, K. (2007) ‘The economics of fair trade coffee:
Televisual, Duke University Press, Durham, NC For whose benefit? An investigation into the limits
Paterson, M. (2000) ‘Car culture and global environ- of fair trade as a development tool and the risk of
mental politics’, Review of International Studies, clean-washing’, HEI Working Paper No 06,
vol 26, pp253–270 Graduate Institute of International Studies,
Pearce, D., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E. (1989) University of Geneva, Geneva
Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, London Pigem, J. (2002) ‘Barcoding life’, New Internationalist,
Pearce, F. (2002) ‘Top scientist ousted’, no 349, available at
New Scientist, 19 April, available at www.newsci- www.newint.org/features/2002/09/01/ethics/
entist.com/article.ns?id=dn2191 Pilar, M. del and Marin, U. (2003) ‘Time for Utopia’,
Pearce, F. (2006) The Last Generation: How Nature will New Internationalist, vol 357, available at
Take her Revenge for Climate Change, Eden Project www.newint.org/issue357/time.htm
Books, London Pillinger, I. (2000) Quality in Social Public Services,
Pearce, J. (2003) Social Enterprise in Anytown, European Foundation for the Improvement of
Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, London Living and Working Conditions, Dublin
Pellow, D. N. (2002) Garbage Wars: The Struggle for Pilnick, A. (2002) Genetics and Society, Open University
Environmental Justice in Chicago, MIT Press, Press, Buckingham, UK
Cambridge, MA Pindar, D. (2005) Visions of the City, Edinburgh
Pellow, D. N. and Park, L. S-H. (2002) The Silicon Valley University Press, Edinburgh, UK
of Dreams: Environmental Justice, Immigrant Pitkin, B. (2006) ‘Community informatics for commu-
Workers and the High-Tech Global Economy, New nity development: The “hope or hype” issue
York University Press, New York revisited’, in P. Purcell (ed) Networked
Pender, J. (2001) ‘From “structural adjustment” to Neighbourhoods: The Connected Community in
“comprehensive development framework”: Context, Springer-Verlag, London
266 Understanding Sustainable Development
Plumwood, V. (1996) ‘Nature, self and gender: community in the twenty-first century’, the 2006
Feminism, environmental philosophy and the Johan Skytte Prize lecture, Scandinavian Political
critique on rationalism’, in K. J. Warren (ed) Studies, vol 30, no 2, pp137–174
Ecological Feminist Philosophies, Indiana Quinn, M. (2006) ‘The power of community: How Cuba
University Press, Bloomington, IN survived peak oil’, Permaculture Activist, spring,
Pontin, J. and Roderick, I. (2007) Converging World: Available at
Connecting Communities in Global Change, http://globalpublicmedia.com/articles/657
Schumacher Briefing no 13, Green Books, Totnes, Raco, M. (2007) Building Sustainable Communities:
UK Spatial Policy and Labour Mobility in Post-War
Porritt, J. (2005) Capitalism as if the World Matters, Britain, Policy Press, Bristol, UK
Earthscan, London Rahmstorf, S. (2007) ‘A semi-empirical approach to
Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2006) ‘Strategy and projecting future sea-level rise’, Science, vol 315,
society: The link between competitive advantage 19 January, available at www.pik-potsdam.de/
and corporate social responsibility’, Harvard ~stefan/Publications/Nature/rahmstorf_science_
Business Review, vol 84, no 12, pp78–92 2007.pdf
Porter, V. and Sims, M. (2003) Environmental Change: Rahmstorf, S., Cazenave, A., Church, J. A., Hansen,
Communicating the Issues (An Intermedia Special J. E., Keeling, R. F., Parker, D. E. and Somerville,
Report), International Institute of Communications, R. C. J. (2007) ‘Recent climate observations
London compared to projections’, Science, vol 316, 4 May,
Portes, A. (1998) ‘Social capital: Its origins and applica- available at www.pik-potsdam.de/
tions in modern sociology’, Annual Review of ~stefan/Publications/Nature/rahmstorf_etal
Sociology, vol 24 pp1–24 _science_2007.pdf
Potts, D. (1997) ‘Urban lives: Adopting new strategies Rakodi, C. (ed) (1997) The Urban Challenge in Africa:
and adapting rural links’, in C. Rakodi (ed) The Growth and Management of its Large Cities,
Urban Challenge in Africa: Growth and United Nations University Press, Tokyo
Management of its Large Cities, United Nations Randall, B. (2001) Songman: The Story of an
University Press, Tokyo Aboriginal Elder, ABC Books, Sydney, Australia
Potts, D. with Mutambirwa, C. (1998) ‘Basics are now a Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P.,
luxury: Perceptions of structural adjustment’s Hammond, A., Kates, R. and Swart, R. (2002) The
impact on rural and urban areas in Zimbabwe’, Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the
Environment and Urbanization, vol 10, no 1, Times Ahead, Stockholm Environment Institute,
pp55–75 Boston, MA
Prahalad, C. K. (2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Ratner, B. D. (2004) ‘“Sustainability” as a dialogue of
Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits, values: Challenges to the sociology of develop-
Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ ment’, Sociological Inquiry, vol 74, no 1, pp59–69
Prahalad, C. K. and Hammond, A. (2002) ‘Serving the Ravetz, J. (2000) ‘Integrated assessment for sustain-
world’s poor profitably’, Harvard Business Review, ability appraisal in cities and regions’,
vol 80, no 9, pp48–57 Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 20,
Princen, T. (2002) ‘Consumption and its externalities: pp31–64
Where economy meets ecology’, in T. Princen, M. Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, Oxford University
Maniates and K. Conca (eds) Confronting Press, Oxford, UK
Consumption, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Raynolds, L. T., Murray, D. and Wilkinson, J. (eds) (2007)
Princen. T. (2005) The Logic of Sufficiency, MIT Press, Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming
Cambridge, MA Globalization, Routledge, London
Princen, T., Maniates, M. and Conca, K. (eds) (2002) Rees, W. and Wackernagel, M. (1996) ‘Urban ecological
Confronting Consumption, MIT Press, Cambridge, footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable – And
MA why they are key to sustainability’, Environmental
Proctor, T., Proctor, S. and Papasolomou, I. (2005) Impact Assessment Review, vol 16, pp223–248
‘Visualizing the metaphor’, Journal of Marketing Reich, C. A. (1970) The Greening of America, Bantam,
Communications, vol 11, no 1, pp55–72 New York
Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Reid, W. V., Berkes, F., Wilbanks, T. J. and Capistrano, D.
Revival of American Community, Simon and (eds) (2006) Bridging Scales and Knowledge
Schuster, New York Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem
Putnam, R. D. (2007) ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC
References 267
Reusswig, F., Schwarzkopf, J. and Polenz, P. (2004) Ross, A. (2005) ‘The UK approach to delivering sustain-
‘Double impact – The climate blockbuster The Day able development in government: A case study in
After Tomorrow and its impact on the German joined-up working’, Journal of Environmental Law,
cinema public’, Report No 92, Potsdam Institute for vol 17, no 1, pp27–49
Climate Impact Research, available at www.pik- Rost, J. C. (1991) Leadership for the 21st Century,
potsdam.de/research/publications/ Praeger, New York
pikreports/.files/pr92.pdf Roszak, T. (1969) The Making of a Counter Culture,
Rheingold, H. (2000) The Virtual Community, MIT Doubleday, New York
Press, Cambridge, MA Roszak, T. (1972) Where the Wasteland Ends: Politics
Ries, A. and Ries, L. (2002) The Fall of Advertising and and Transcendence in Postindustrial Society,
the Rise of PR, HarperBusiness, New York Doubleday, New York
Rifkin, J. (2000) The Age of Access: How the Shift from Roth, L. (2005) Something New in the Air: The Story of
Ownership to Access is Transforming Modern Life, First Peoples Television Broadcasting in Canada,
Penguin Books, London McGill-Queens University Press, Quebec, Canada
Ritzer, G. (2000) The McDonaldization of Society, Pine Rumming, K. (ed) (2004) The Hanover Kronsberg
Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA Handbook, City of Hanover, available at
Robèrt, K-H. (2000) ‘Tools and concepts for sustainable www.sibart.org/pdf/handbook_big_en.pdf
development: How do they relate to a general Sachs, I. (1999) ‘Social sustainability and whole devel-
framework for sustainable development, and to opment: Exploring the dimensions of sustainable
each other?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol 8, development’, in E. Becker and T. Jahn (eds)
pp243–254 Sustainability and the Social Sciences, Zed Books,
Robèrt, K-H. (2004) ‘Natural step by step: An interview London
with Julian Gold’, Corporate Knights, March, avail- Sachs, J. D. (2005) The End of Poverty: How we can
able at www.corporateknights.ca/content/ Make it Happen in our Lifetime, Penguin Books,
page.asp?name=pushing_limits_kh_robert London
Robèrt, K-H., Schmidt-Bleek, B., de Larderel, J. A., Sachs, W. (1999) Planet Dialectics: Explorations in
Basile, G., Jansen, J. L., Kuehr, R., Price Thomas, P., Environment and Development, Zed Books, London
Suzuki, M., Hawken, P. and Wackernagel, M. (2002) Sachs, W. (2004) ‘Environment and human rights’,
‘Strategic sustainable development – Selection, Development, vol 47, no 1, pp42–49
design and synergy of applied tools’, Journal of Saith, A. (2006) ‘From universal values to Millennium
Cleaner Production, vol 10, pp197–214 Development Goals: Lost in translation’,
Roberts, R. (1971) The Classic Slum: Salford Life in the Development and Change, vol 37, no 6, pp1167–1199
First Quarter of the Century, Penguin, Saiz, A. V. (2005) ‘Globalization, cosmopolitanism and
Harmondsworth, UK ecological citizenship’, Environmental Politics, vol
Robinson, J. (2004) ‘Squaring the circle? Some 14, no 2, pp163–178
thoughts on the idea of sustainable development’, Sale, K. (1991) Dwellers in the Land: The Bioregional
Ecological Economics, vol 48, pp369–384 Vision, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA
Robinson, J. and Tinker, J. (1997) ‘Reconciling ecologi- Sandilands, C. (2002) ‘Between the local and the
cal, economic and social imperatives: A new global: Clayoquot Sound and simulacral politics’, in
conceptual framework’, in T. Schrecker (ed) W. Magnusson and K. Shaw (eds) A Political Space:
Surviving Globalism: The Social and Environmental Reading the Global through Clayoquot Sound,
Challenges, St Martin’s Press, New York McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, Canada
Rodgers, D. (2004) ‘“Disembedding” the city: Crime, Sargisson, L. (2001) ‘Politicizing the quotidian’,
insecurity and spatial organization in Managua, Environmental Politics, vol 10, no 2, pp68–89
Nicaragua’, Environment and Urbanization, vol 16, Satterthwaite, D. (1997) ‘Environmental transforma-
no 2, pp113–123 tions in cities as they get larger, wealthier and
Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, Free better managed’, The Geographical Journal, vol
Press, New York 163, no 2, pp216–224
Romig, K. (2005) ‘The Upper Sonoran lifestyle: Gated Schaper, M. (2002) ‘The essence of ecopreneurship’,
communities in Scottsdale, Arizona’, City and Greener Management International, vol 38,
Community, vol 4, no 1, pp67–86 pp26–30
Roseland, M. (1998) Toward Sustainable Communities: Schiller, H. I. (1989) Culture Inc.: The Corporate
Resources for Citizens and their Governments, New Takeover of Public Expression, Oxford University
Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada Press, Oxford, UK
268 Understanding Sustainable Development
Schor, J. (1998) The Overspent American, Singh, A. (2005) One Planet, Many People: Atlas of our
HarperPerennial, New York Changing Environment, UNEP/Earthprint,
Schumacher, E. F. (1974) Small is Beautiful, Abacus, Stevenage, UK
London Slikkerveer, L. J. and Slikkerveer, M. K. L. (1995) ‘Taman
Scott, W. A. H. and Gough, S. R. (2003) Sustainable Obat Keluarga (TOGA): Indigenous Indonesian
Development and Learning: Framing the Issues, medicine for self-reliance’, in D. M. Warren, L. J.
Routledge/Falmer, London Slikkerveer and D. Brokensha (eds) The Cultural
SDC (2007) Every Child’s Future Matters, Sustainable Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge
Development Commission, London, available at Systems, Intermediate Technology Publications,
www.sd-commission.org.uk/ London
publications/downloads/ECFM_report.pdf Smith, D. M., Cusack, S., Colman, A. W., Folland,
Seabrook, J. (1996) In the Cities of the South, Verso, C. K., Harris, G. R. and Murphy, J. M. (2007)
London ‘Improved surface temperature prediction for the
Semler, R. (2004) The Seven-Day Weekend: A Better coming decade from a global climate model’,
Way to Work in the 21st Century, Century/Random Science, vol 317, 10 August, pp796–799
House, London Smith, J. (2004) ‘The World Social Forum and the
Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom, Oxford challenges of global democracy’, Global Networks,
University Press, Oxford, UK vol 4, no 4, pp413–421
Senge, P. M. (1990) ‘The leader’s new work: Building Smith, T., Sonnenfeld, D. A. and Pellow, D. N. (eds)
learning organizations’, in D. S. Pugh (ed) (2006) Challenging the Chip: Labour Rights and
Organization Theory, Penguin, London Environmental Justice in the Global Electronics
Senge, P. M. (1999) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Industry, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA
Practice of the Learning Organization, Random Soil Association (2007) ‘Soil Association to ensure air-
House, London freighted organic food benefits poor farmers – And
Seyfang, G. (2005) ‘Shopping for sustainability: Can challenges UK Government to do same for all air-
sustainable consumption promote ecological freighted produce’, press release, 25 October 2007,
citizenship?’, Environmental Politics, vol 14, available at www.soilassociation.org/pressreleases
no 2, pp290–306 Soper, K. (2005) ‘Thinking the unnatural’, Capitalism
Shand, H. and Wetter, K. J. (2006) ‘Shrinking science: Nature Socialism, vol 16, no 1, pp129–134
An introduction to nanotechnology’, in L. Starke Spaid, S. (2002) Ecovention: Current Art to Transform
(ed) State of the World 2006, Ecologies, Contemporary Arts Center, Cincinnati, OH
Earthscan/Worldwatch Institute, London Stapleton, L. M. and Garrod, G. D. (2007) ‘Keeping
Shellberger, M. and Nordhaus, T. (2004) The Death of things simple: Why the human development index
Environmentalism, Breakthrough Institute, should not diverge from its equal weights assump-
Oakland, CA, available at tion’, Social Indicators Research, vol 84,
www.thebreakthrough.org/images/Death_of_ pp179–188
Environmentalism.pdf Stefanovic, I. L. (2000) Safeguarding our Common
Shiva, V. (1993) ‘The Chipko women’s concept of Future: Rethinking Sustainable Development, State
freedom’, in M. Meis and V. Shiva (eds) University of New York Press, New York
Ecofeminism, Zed Books, London Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education: Revisioning
Shiva, V. (2000) Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the Learning and Change, Green Books, Totnes, UK
Global Food Supply, South End Press, Cambridge, Sterling, S. (2004) ‘Systemic thinking’, in Tilbury and
MA Wortman (eds) Engaging People in Sustainability,
Shuftan, C. (1996) ‘The community development IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
dilemma: What is really empowering?’, Community Stern, N. (2005) Stern Review: Report on the
Development Journal, vol 13, no 3, pp260–264 Economics of Climate Change, HM Treasury,
Shutkin, W. A. (2001) The Land That Could Be: London, available at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/
Environmentalism and Democracy in the 21st independent_reviews/stern_review_
Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA economics_climate_change/stern_review_
SIGMA Project (2003) ‘The SIGMA guidelines: Putting report.cfm
sustainable development into practice’, available at Stewart, K. (2006) ‘Designing good urban governance
www.projectsigma.co.uk/default.asp indicators: The importance of citizen participation
Silverstone, R. (2007) Media and Morality: On the Rise and its evaluation in Greater Vancouver’, Cities, vol
of the Mediapolis, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA 23, no 3, pp196–204
References 269
Stiglitz, J. (2002) Globalization and its Discontents, United Nations (UN) (2000) ‘Millennium Declaration:
Penguin, London Resolution adopted by the General Assembly’,
Stiglitz, J. (2006) Making Globalization Work: The Next available at www.unmillennium
Steps to Global Justice, Penguin, London project.org/documents/ares552e.pdf
Stiglitz, J. and Charlton, A. (2005) Fair Trade for All: UN (2002a) ‘Report of the World Summit on
How Trade can Promote Development, Oxford Sustainable Development’, available at www.johan-
University Press, Oxford, UK nesburgsummit.org/html/
Sudjic, D. (2006) ‘Making cities work: China’, BBC documents.html
News, 21 June, available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/ UN (2002b) ‘Financing for development: Building on
2/hi/asia-pacific/5084852.stm Monterrey’, available at
Sunstein, C. R. (2006) Infotopia: How Many Minds www.un.org/esa/ffd/Documents/Building%
Produce Knowledge, Oxford University Press, 20on%20Monterrey.pdf, accessed 14 June 2007
Oxford, UK UN (2006) ‘The Millennium Development Goals Report
Sveiby, K-E. and Skuthorpe, T. (2006) Treading Lightly: 2006’, available at
The Hidden Wisdom of the World’s Oldest People, http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Pro
Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, Australia ducts/Progress2006/MDGReport2006.pdf
Talen, E. (2002) ‘The social goals of new urbanism’, UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)
Housing Policy Debate, vol 13, no 1, pp165–188 (1997) ‘Governance for sustainable human devel-
Tapscott, D. and Williams, A. D. (2007) Wikinomics: opment: A UNDP policy document’, available at
How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, www.pogar.org/publications/other/undp/
Atlantic Books, London governance/undppolicydoc97-e.pdf
Taylor, D. E. (1997) ‘Women of colour, environmental UNDP (2006) ‘Governance indicators: A user’s guide’,
justice and ecofeminism’, in K. J. Warren (ed) available at www.undp.org/
Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature, Indiana oslocentre/docs04/UserGuide.pdf
University Press, Bloomington, IN UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme)
Teather, D. (2007) ‘Branded for life?’, The Guardian, 25 (2005) Talk the Walk: Advancing Sustainable
October, available at www.guardian.co.uk/g2/ Lifestyles through Marketing and
story/0,,2198430,00.html Communications, UNEP, Paris, PDF available at
Teivainen, T. (2002) ‘The World Social Forum and global www.unep.fr/pc/sustain/reports/advertising/
democratization: Learning from Porto Alegre’, Third Talk_the_Walk.pdf
World Quarterly, vol 23, no 4, pp621–632 UNEP (2006) ‘Gender mainstreaming among environ-
Thussu, D. K. (2006) International Communication: ment ministries’, available at
Continuity and Change, Hodder Arnold, London www.unep.org/civil_society/PDF_docs/UNEP-
Tilbury, D. and Wortman, D. (2004) Engaging People in survey-reportJan-07.pdf, accessed 14 June 2007
Sustainability, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, available UNEP (2007) Sustainability Communications: A Toolkit
at www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2004-055.pdf, for Marketing and Advertising Courses (CD Rom),
accessed 23 July 2007 UNEP, Paris, available at
Tinsley, S. and George, H. (2006) Ecological Footprint www.unep.fr/pc/sustain/advertising/events
of the Findhorn Foundation and Community, _specifics/Education%20Kit_EN.htm
Sustainable Development Research Centre, UHI UNEP/Futerra (2005) Communicating Sustainability:
Millennium Institute, Moray, UK How to Produce Effective Public Campaigns, UNEP,
Tomlinson, J. (1991) Cultural Imperialism, Continuum, Paris, available at
London www.unep.fr/pc/sustain/reports/advertising/
Torgenson, D. (1999) The Promise of Green Politics: Communication_Guide/webEN2.pdf
Environmentalism and the Public Sphere, Duke UNESCO (2005) ‘United Nations Decade of Education
University Press, Durham, NC for Sustainable Development 2005–2014’, available
Tuan, Y-F. (1977) Space and Place: The Perspective of at http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php
Experience, University of Minnesota Press, Unger, R. M. (2004) False Necessity: Anti-necessitarian
Minneapolis, MN Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy,
Turnhout, E., Hisschemoller, M. and Eijsackers, H. (2007) Verso, London
‘Ecological indicators: Between the two fires of UN-Habitat (2000) ‘UNCHS (Habitat) – The global
science and policy’, Ecological Indicators, vol 7, campaign for good urban governance’,
pp215–228 Environment and Urbanization, vol 12, no 1,
Turner, B. S. (1993) Citizenship and Social Theory, Sage, pp197–202
London
270 Understanding Sustainable Development
UN-Habitat (2003) The Challenge of the Slums: Global Warren, K. (1996) ‘The power and promise of ecological
Report on Human Settlements 2003, Earthscan for feminism’, in K. Warren (ed) Ecological Feminist
the United Nations Human Settlements Philosophies, Indiana University Press,
Programme (UN-Habitat), London Bloomington, IN
Van der Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G. and Rucht, Warren, K. (2004) ‘Sustainable development and
D. (eds) (2004) Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens sustainable development education: An ecofemi-
and Social Movements, Routledge, London nist philosophical perspective on the importance of
van Matre, S. (1990) Earth Education: A New gender’, in J. Blewitt and C. Cullingford (eds) The
Beginning, Institute for Earth Education, Greenville, Sustainability Curriculum: The Challenge for
WV Higher Education, Earthscan, London
Verburg, R. M. and Weigel, V. (1997) ‘On the compati- Warren, S. (2004) ‘Review of Pellow and Park (2002)’,
bility of sustainability and economic growth’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol 26, no 3, pp401–403
Environmental Ethics, vol 17, no 3, pp247–265 Watkins, K. et al (2006) Human Development Report
Vidal, J. (2007a) ‘A better brew’, The Guardian, 12 2006: Beyond Scarcity – Power, Poverty and the
September, available at http://society.guardian.co.uk/ Global Water Crisis, PalgraveMacmillan for the
societyguardian/story/0,,2166745,00.html United Nations Development Programme, London
Vidal, J. (2007b) ‘Welcome to the Isle of Wight: Watkins, K. et al (2007) Human Development Report
Yachting Mecca, tourist haven … and eco trail- 2007–2008: Fighting Climate Change: Human
blazer’, The Guardian, 2 November, available at Solidarity in a Divided World, PalgraveMacmillan
www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/nov/ for the United Nations Development Programme,
02/isleofwight London
Viola, B. (1981) Hatsu-Yume (First Dream), video WCED (World Commission on Environment and
produced as artist-in-residence at Sony Development) (1987) Our Common Future, OUP,
Corporation, Japan, 56 minutes, now available on Oxford, UK
DVD Webb, T. (2007) ‘Going green keeps tills ringing’, Ethical
Von Weizsacker, E., Lovins, A. B. and Lovins, L. H. (1997) Corporation, September, pp46–47
Factor Four: Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource WEDO (Women’s Environment and Development
Use, Earthscan, London Organization) (2007) ‘Changing the climate: Why
Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W. (1996) Our Ecological women’s perspectives matter’, available at
Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, www.un.org/esa/ffd/Documents/Building%
New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada 20on%20Monterrey.pdf, accessed 14 June 2007
Wackernagel, M. and Yount, D. (1998) ‘The ecological Weinberger, D. (2002) Small Pieces Loosely Joined,
footprint: An indicator of progress toward regional Basic Books, New York
sustainability’, Environmental Monitoring and Welford, R. (1998) ‘Life-cycle assessment’, in R.
Assessment, vol 51, pp511–529 Welford (ed) Corporate Environmental
Wackernagel, M. and Yount, D. (2000) ‘Footprints for Management, Earthscan, London
sustainability: The next steps’, Environment, Wellman, B. and Haythornthwaite, C. (eds) (2002) The
Development and Sustainability, vol 2, pp21–42 Internet and Everyday Life, Blackwell, Oxford, UK
Walker, B. H. and Salt, D. (2006) Resilience Thinking: Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Witte, J. and Hampton, K.
Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing (2001) ‘Does the internet increase, decrease or
World, Island Press, Washington, DC supplement social capital? Social networks, partici-
Wapner, P. (1996) Environmental Activism and World pation, and community commitment’, American
Civic Politics, State University of New York Press, Behavioral Scientist, vol 45, no 3, pp436–455
Albany, NY Wessel, D. (2007) ‘Prizes for solutions to problems play
Ward, B. and Lewis, J. (2002) Plugging the Leaks: valuable role in innovation’, Wall Street Journal
Making the Most of Every Pound that Enters your Online, 25 January, available at http://
Local Economy, New Economics Foundation, webreprints.djreprints.com/1657770067525.html
London Wharburton, D. (2006) Community Learning and
Ward, C. (2002) Cotters and Squatters: Housing’s Action for Sustainability, WWF-UK, Godalming, UK,
Hidden History, Five Leaves Publications, available at www.wwflearning.org.uk/
Nottingham, UK data/files/clasl-design-summary-web-383.pdf
Warner, K. (2002) ‘Linking local sustainability initiatives Wheatley, M. (1999) Leadership and the New Science:
with environmental justice’, Local Environment, vol Discovering Order in a Chaotic World, Berrett-
7, no 1, pp35–47 Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA
References 271
Wheatley, M. (2001a) ‘Restoring hope for the future Wright, B. (2005) ‘Living and dying in Louisiana’s
through critical education of leaders’, Vimut “Cancer Alley”’, in R. D. Bullard (ed) The Quest for
Shiksha, March, available at www.margaretwheat- Environmental Justice: Human Rights and the
ley.com/articles/restoringhope.html, accessed 20 Politics of Pollution, Sierra Club Books, San
June 2007 Francisco, CA
Wheatley, M. (2001b) ‘The real work of knowledge Wright, F. L. (1958) The Living City, Horizon Press, New
management’, IHRIM Journal, vol 5, no 2, pp29–33, York
International Association for Human Resources WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) (2006) Living
Information Management, available at Planet Report 2006, WWF, Gland, Switzerland,
www.margaretwheatley.com/articles/ available at www.panda.org/news_facts/
management.html, accessed 18 June 2007 publications/living_planet_report/index.cfm
Wheatley, M. and Kellner-Rogers, M. (1999) A Simpler Wynne, B. (1996) ‘May the sheep safely graze? A
Way, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide’,
Wilkinson, D. and Appelbee, E. (1999) Implementing in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) Risk,
Holistic Government, Policy Press, Bristol, UK Environment and Modernity: Towards a New
Wilkinson, R. G. (1996) Unhealthy Societies: The Ecology, Sage, London
Affliction of Inequality, Routledge, London Yanarella, E. J. and Levine, R. S. (1992) ‘Does sustain-
Wilkinson, R. G. (2005) The Impact of Inequality: How able development lead to sustainability?’, Futures,
to Make Sick Societies Healthier, Routledge, vol 24, no 8, pp759–774
London York, R. and Rosa, E. A. (2003) ‘Key challenges to
Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (eds) (2000) ecological modernization theory’, Organization and
Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, Spon, London Environment, vol 16, no 3, pp273–288
Winner, L. (1989) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search Young, M. and Willmott, P. (1957) Family and Kinship
for Limits in an Age of High Technology, University in East London, Routledge, London
of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL York, R., Rosa, E. A. and Dietz, T. (2003) ‘Footprints on
Winner, L. (1997) ‘Technology today: Utopia or the Earth: The environmental consequences of
dystopia?’, Social Research, vol 64, no 3, modernity’, American Sociological Review, vol 68,
pp989–1017 pp279–300
Wolpert, L. (1993) The Unnatural Nature of Science, Zadek, (2001) The Civil Corporation: The New Economy
Faber and Faber, London of Corporate Citizenship, Earthscan, London
Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000) ‘Social capital: Zhang, K. H. (2002) ‘What explains China’s rising
Implications for development theory, research and urbanization in the reform era?’, Urban Studies, vol
policy’, World Bank Research Observer, vol 15, no 2, 39, no 12, pp2301–2315
pp225–250 Ziff, L. (ed) (1982) Ralph Waldo Emerson: Selected
World Bank (2003) Sustainable Development in a Essays, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK
Dynamic World: Transforming Institutions, Growth Zittel, W. and Schindler, J. (2007) The Crude Oil Supply
and Quality of Life, World Bank and OUP, Outlook, Energy Watch Group, Ottobrunn,
Washington, DC Germany, available at
World Bank (2006) ‘Governance and anti-corruption’, www.energywatchgroup.org/fileadmin/global/
available at http://info.worldbank.org/ pdf/EWG_Oilreport_10-2007.pdf
governance/kkz2005/maps.html
Worldwatch Institute (2007) Biofuels for Transport:
Global Potential and Implications for Energy and
Agriculture, Earthscan, London