Human Geography: Political Geography: Geopolitik
Human Geography: Political Geography: Geopolitik
Human Geography: Political Geography: Geopolitik
A subdiscipline concerned with the study of the spatial dimensions of politics. Although sharing
many of the theories, methods, and interests as human geography in general, it has a particular
interest in territory, the state, power, and boundaries (including borders), across a range of scales
from the body to the planet. ‘Politics’ refers not simply to the formal organization of political life
through government, elections, parties, etc., but all aspects of social life involving governance or
where some degree of contentiousness or conflict may arise. Interpreted more broadly, therefore,
political geography can encompass all those ideas about the relationships between geography and
politics extending beyond academic contexts (see anti-politics).
Political geography has meant and studied different things in different contexts. In the late 19th
century it was partly synonymous with human geography as a whole. Friedrich Ratzel is credited
with the first use of the term in his book Politische Geographie, in which he aligned non-
physical geography with the study of the state in space. Mackinder similarly distinguished
political and physical geography. The work of geographers in France, Germany, Britain, and the
USA in exploring the geographical foundations of state power is now more commonly classified
as geopolitics. Anxious to distance themselves from the German school of geopolitik because of
its close links to the Nazi regime, prominent US geographers such as Isaiah
Bowman and Richard Hartshorne described their work as ‘political geography’. But, actual
empirical research in the field dried up, perhaps because of the taint of geopolitics, and
theoretical advance halted. The main exception was work on boundaries and boundary disputes,
which was a preoccupation of French and German geographers before the Second World
War and of interest to British geographers in the subsequent phase of decolonization. In terms of
theory, a notable exception was the work of French geographer Jean Gottmann who, like
Hartshorne, tried to understand the relations between the modern state, territory, and identity. His
recognition of the significance of iconography and the state idea prefigured later contributions.
In the 1960s, political geography was reframed in terms of political studies from spatial
perspectives, with elections, boundaries, and subnational administrative organization among its
subject matter (see electoral geography; spatial science). A core problem for example, was the
effect of international boundaries on spatial interaction. The impact of the cultural and political
upheavals across the world in the late 1960s was twofold. On the one hand, impelled by radical
geography and informed by Marxism, feminism, and socialism, swathes of human geography
became politicized, i.e. were more attentive to conflict and difference and prepared to challenge
the existing order. In one sense, most if not all, human geography could be described thereafter
as political. The specific area of a self-described political geography itself enjoyed a revival. The
former focus on the state gave way to an interest in the world scale; for example, in Peter
Taylor’s development of the world-systems approach, as well as the urban scale, in the work
of Kevin Cox, Ron Johnston, David Harvey, and others. Issues of class, and later race, gender,
and sexuality came to the fore. In France, Yves Lacoste founded the journal Hérodote (1976) to
introduce French geographers to some of the radical ideas of the country’s new generation of
social and political theorists. The leading journal Political Geography Quarterly (later
renamed Political Geography) was founded in 1982, marking the recovery of the field.
Thereafter, political geography generated and responded to the same currents as human
geography in general, including postmodernism, post-structuralism, and post-
colonialism (see critical geopolitics). To the long-standing interests in the state, power and
boundaries, modern courses and texts in the field include sexual politics, citizenship, social
movements, civil society, globalization, and environment. Indeed, globalization has reopened
older debates about the relations between territory, identity, and boundaries. Wars in the
Balkans, Afghanistan, and Iraq, and the related ‘war on terror’ have prompted a greater interest
in violence, both state and non-state (see terrorism; war). Political ecology marks the overlap
between political geography and a concern for nature, resources, and the environment. Given the
significance of climate change, food security, and oil resources, political geographers have in
some ways revived the preoccupations of their 19th-century predecessors for the physical
environment, although without the trappings of environmental determinism.
It often studies local and national elections, international relationships and the
political structure of different areas based on geography.
Heartland Theory
Halford Mackinder's Heartland Theory was another early theory in political
geography.
Both Ratzel and Mackinder's theories remained important before and during
World War II. The Heartland Theory, for instance, influenced the creation of
buffer states between the Soviet Union and Germany at the end of the war.
By the time of the Cold War, their theories and the importance of political
geography began to decline and other fields within human geography began to
develop.
In the late 1970s however, political geography again began to grow. Today,
political geography is considered one of the most important branches of human
geography and many geographers study a variety of fields concerned with
political processes and geography.
Modern political trends also have an impact on political geography, and in recent
years sub-topics focused on these trends have developed within political
geography. This is known as critical political geography and includes political
geography focused on ideas related to feminist groups and gay and lesbian issues
as well as youth communities.
Examples of Research
Some of the most famous geographers to study political geography were John A.
Agnew, Richard Hartshorne, Halford Mackinder, Friedrich Ratzel and Ellen
Churchill Semple.
Today, political geography is also a specialty group within the Association of
American Geographers and there is an academic journal called Political
Geography. Some titles from articles in this journal include "Redistricting and
the Elusive Ideals of Representation," "Climate Triggers: Rainfall Anomalies,
Vulnerability and Communal Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa," and "Normative
Goals and Demographic Realities."
Sources