Community-Based Disaster Preparedness Plan
Community-Based Disaster Preparedness Plan
Community-Based Disaster Preparedness Plan
PREPAREDNESS PLAN
Structure
6.0 Learning Outcome
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Community- based Disaster Preparedness: Need and Significance
6.3 Community- based Disaster Preparedness Plan 1
6.4 Operationalising Community-based Disaster Preparedness Plan: Key Strategies
6.5 Conclusion
6.6 . Key Concepts
6.7 References and Further' Reading
6.8 Activities
The first important step towards ensuring future safety as far as possible, from disasters
of any kind is to prepare an advance plan so that there is systematic, easy and
comprehensive action. Planning substitutes order for chaos and introduces rationality into
decision-making process. I t reduces random and haphazard activity. Disaster Preparedness
Pla~isfacilitate the handling of crisis especially in unforeseen circumstances. A preparedness
plan made at the community level is a comprehensive document which indicates measures
to 5e taken up by the community before, during and after disasters. It also needs to
incorporate capacity building measures for the community, development requirements of
the area, etc, A plan prepared at the grass roots level, with community's involvement
ensures compliance by all concerned stakeholders. In this Unit, we shall highlight the need
and significance of disaster preparedness and bring out the components of community-
based disaster preparedness plan. An attempt i s made to identify the key strategies of
operationalising commun ity-based disaster preparedness plan.
mobilisation of capabilities and capacities of local population. It is also known that the
local communities have an active part to play before and after disasters because:
+ A good state of preparedness before a disaster strikes may reduce its impact.
a More number of lives can be saved during the first few hours after a disaster has
occurred, before help arrives from elsewhere.
a The numerous problems of survival and health resulting from a disaster are dealt with
more efficiently, if the community is active and well-organised (WHO, 1989).
In the face of devastating impact of disasters, the task of supporting the resilience of
Indian communities has never been more urgent. Resilience is talcen to mean the capacity '
to mitigate, prepare for, respond to and recover from the irr~pactof disaster-in a way
whicli leaves communities less at risk than before. The three Case Studies which we shall
be discussing, illustrate ways of enhancing resilience, before, during and after disaster. The
first study focuses on the village of ~arnia~alliin the highly disaster-prone state of Orissa,
which reveals how prioritising risk deduction before disaster strikes pays dividends in the
future. During the 1990s, the people of Samiapalli, with the help of a local non-
governmental organisation embarked on a long process of development, one element of
which was to construct disaster-proof homes.
When the 'super cyclone' of October 1999 struck the villages, these houses saved both
lives and livelihoods, while tens of thousands of people in weaker homes perished around
them. Zaheerabad region of Andhra Pradesh, since mid-1990s, has been suffering an
ongoing disaster of chronic food insecurity, driven by drought and the failure of pest-prone
cash crops such as wheat, rice and cotton. I-Iowever, inspired by a local development
agency, some of the state's poorest and most marginalised communities have rediscovered
traditional, drought-proofing seeds and farming techniques in a bid for self-sufficiency. This
initiative has spread to 65 villages. Similarly villages from Patanka in the state of Gujarat
rebuilt their homes stronger than before, with*the help of a partnership of local and
international aid organisations. Farmers, left unemployed by three years of intense drought,
were retrained as masons and helped build earthquake-resistant houses for every family
in the village. Building on the success of this initiative, villagers were able to access
government funds to create a new rainwater harvesting system to improve both their
health and crop yields (World disaster.^ Report, 2004).
Though the co~nrnunityhas an important role, their coping mechanisms are undervalued.
But as observed in case of any disaster, the responsibility of the community and local
government is nluch inore in setting goals, devising rehabilitation programmes, managing
recovery, and developing priorities. The role of central and state governments is mostly
confined to rendering advice, providing funds towards relief and other resources, Hence,
we need to recognise the community as a key resource in disaster management.
Communities and victims are a resource because: .
They are knowledgeable about disasters happening in their own environment and are
sometimes able to forecast them..
They are rich in experience of coping, both in preparedness and in'emergencies.
Their coping methods - practised over time and derived from their own experience-
suit the local environment best. The richness and diversity of ordinary people's coping
. strategies is certainly a resource to be recognised (Ariyabandu, 1999).
There is a clear shift h m superimposed efforts to attain development or tackle any crisis
that is directed towards the people at risk. Now the capacities, methods and ways
Community- h i e d Disaster Preparedness Plnn 87
through which people at risk manage and respond, and find alternatives to crisis and
stress, are becoming important. There is a realisation gaining momentum that the global
capacity to prepare for and respond to disaster needs to be strengthened. The development
of improved capacity arises froin the need to instil the principles of self-reliance and self-
help into the vulnerable communities. The communities ill many countries are playing a key
role in preparedness activities.
In India, in the Saurashtra District of Gujarat, around 10,000 check dams have been built
responding to the Sate Government's "Build Your Own Dam" (BYOD) scheme. Under
the project, the government bears 60 per cent of the total cost of the dam while the
villagers shoulder the remaining costs through voluntary labou~:Similarly in village Rarnpur
in Okhaldhunga District, Nepal, monsoon rains while contributing to agricultural productivity
the main livelihood, also bring the threat of soil erosion, landslides and flooding. Villagers
have worked out techniques to 'manage' monsoons, to trap adequate quantities of
monsoon rains for agricultural put-poses and to let the excess out. Stone worlcs are used
to stabilise slopes and to make diversions to check gully erosion. Grass and tree planting
are done to reduce soil erosion during the monsoon. All construction and resource
management work in the village is done to Jet the flood out without much damage (Dahal,
1998).
Community efforts still are being underutilised due to lack of resources, access to
information, technology, awareness etc. This calls far strengthening their capacities in the
following areas:
Assessment
Monitoring
Early warning and preparedness systems
Identifying and working with those who need the assistance
Acc~~rate
and effective communications stralegies
Developing systems for cooperation and collaboration among response groups in the
recovery process; and
a Erective leadership in the implementation of preparedness and response programmes.
A community- based approach is necessary in not only responding to disaster situations
but also in bringing about adequate preparedness with provision of human, material and
financial resources. Any disaster preparedness planning needs to give irnportance to local
participation at various levels and ways that woi~ldbring desired results to people at grass
roots level.
Community-based Disaster Preparedness (CRDP) has to incorporate certain important
components. These include:
Hazard Mapping and Zoning
Involving Panchayati Raj Institutions
Formulating Community preparedness and Contingency Plans
8 Forming Disaster Task Forces at the village and block levels
Disaster Preparedness
b) Providing shelter for people as well as livestock. This includes arrangements for
water supply, sanitation, kitchens, fodder for animals, medical services and first aid
etc.
c) Clearing of debris from collapsed buildings, bridges, trees, otlier structures, re-
establishing of transport and communication services.
a) Undertaking a detailed damage assessment covering verified nuln ber of human lives,
identification of live victims as well as the dead; livestock, infrastructure, damage to
crops and the estimatkd value.
90 Disaster Preparedne'ss
effective mechanism in making CBDP more sustainable. In lndira Gandhi National Open
University, the Faculty of Public Administration, School of Social Sciences, has also made
some efforts in this direction. During 1998-90, a Project on Comm~~nity Awareness on
Disaster Preparedness (CADP) was talcen up in collaboration with the Yashwant Rao
Chavan Academy of Developtnent Administration (YASHADA), Pune. The major objectives
of the programme have been to create awareness on disasters, upgrade information and
strengthen the resilience and self-confidence of local communities in select villages in the
State of Maharashtra. Similar activity sponsored by Ministry of Agriculture, Goyernment
o f India was undertaken during 2000-2002 in 100 villages each in the Five States of
Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Orissa and Uttas Pradesh. New initiatives in the
form of constitution of Disaster Taslc Force (DTF), formulating Community Action Plan on
Disaster Preparedness etc., were introduced. The most important aspect of this effort is
to initiate strategies to operationalise community-based preparedness plans. We shall be
discussing this in the next Section.
Under the Government of India - UNDP Disaster Risk Management Programme, in
Lahotigllat Block of Morigaon District in Assam, local residenls expressed their concern
for adopting preparedness and mitigation techniques during flood season. It was decided
to construct a raised platfolm with a flat bank cum community fishety to be used during
flood and non-flood season. The site for this was donated by the village members. Gram
Sabha was entrusted the task of approving the purchase of machine boats and their
maintenance. Being awa1-e of the community's vulnerability to disasters during fiequent
occurrence of floods, the disaster management committee's representatives involved the
community in the mitigation activities. Tl~soughcommunity sensitisation meetings, corn~nittecs
have been able to prepare the CBDP plan an integral part of a development plan for the
community (Government o f India, Ministry of Home Affairs, 2004).
CONCLUSION
.The communid- based disaster preparedness ttirough various measures such as formulation
of plans at community level, evolving preparedness and mitigation measures, generating
awareness etc., can go a long way in effective disaster management. The community by
organising itself in the form of committees, task forces and groups will be able to assess
their strengths, weaknesses, and experiment with innovative methods, identify skills etc.
Human beings everywhere are organised at the community level to carry out collective
tasks. The people live in diverse social situations and accordingly their priorities could
vary. But the community level is the key focal point for disaster management efforts,
particularly in the mitigation and preparedness process. This needs a strong cornmitment
from the cornmunity,.and commitment on the part of local authorities to motivate
community for participation. Any effort towards mitigation or preparedness or recovery
should be to work with the communities instead of doing things for them.
KEY CONCEPTS
Community-based Disaster * : A plan prepared in consultation and by the community
Management Plan members to safeguard their colnmunity against any
likely disaster. Specific roles ,and responsibilities ire
outlined for individuals.
'Hazard Mapping : It is the pocess of establishing geographically where
to and to what extent particular phenornena are likely
to pose a threat to people, property, infrastructure
and economic activities. It represents the results of
hazard assessment on a map sl~owingthe frequency
and probability of occurrence of various magnitudes
or duration.
Cornmztnity- Based Disaster Prepa~ednessPlnn 95
6.8 ACTMTIES
1) In your area, discuss with the members of Resident Welfare Association or any other
group and get their views about the community based disaster preparedness and
preparation o f a plan.
2) Contact a few shop owners 'near your house and attempt to make a disaster
preparedness plan in case of a fire or earthquake or any other disaster. .J