Haccp Plant Table Feed Safety Management System: Raw Material
Haccp Plant Table Feed Safety Management System: Raw Material
Haccp Plant Table Feed Safety Management System: Raw Material
RAW MATERIAL
Occasionaly
Bahaya Bahaya Potensial Sumber Bahaya Potential
Commonly
Very High
Un-Likely
Probable
(Hazard (Potensial Hazard) (Source of hazard) Hazard
High
Med
Low
Category) Significant)
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 PFAD Oil receiving Chemical Heavy metal as lead, From Preveous Process v v Not Significant Pb= low, because supplier
cadmium, like WINA is GMP+ and FSSC
mercury & arsenic certified. Also, record over
Contamination through the years shows heavy metal
external sources level is within specifcations
S=high, because of the
combined risks of heavy
PFAD used in Megalac
production.
Physical Contamination of foreign From suppliers storage v v Not significant Pb = Medium because
materials such as dust tank. foreign materials like a sand is
dirt and sand. occasionally found
at the VWFII receiving
strainer.
Chemical . Heavy Metal as Lead & v v Not significant Pb & S = Low, because record
Arsenic over the years show heavy
· Contamination through metal level is within
external sources specification
· Part of product
specification
3 BHT Purchase Chemical . Heavy Metal as Lead v v Not significant Pb = Low, because record
and receiving · Contamination through over the years show heavy
external sources metal level is within
· Part of product specification
specification S = low because dosage
added into PFAD is verry
small, i.e. 0.20% only,
supported by COA from
supplier and 3rd party lab
verification once per year by
supplier.
4 Processed Physical rust from pipeline and v v Significant Pb = probable, because pipeline
treated water sand. is using carbon steel (easy to
from utility rust). S = high, because when
consume by animals, it's harmful
to their health.
7 Megalac bag – Physical Foreign material like dust v v Not significant Pb &S = low, moldy pallet
650kg purchase & dirt due to unclean unlikely to be acceptable
(Jumbo bag) pallets during receiving supplier
delivers pallets in truck with
cover.
8 Wooden pallets Physical Foreign material like dust v v Not significant Pb & S = low, because before
& dirt due to unclean dispatching supplier has already
pallets checked and during receiving
factory, will also checked
- Jika bahaya bisa dikendalikan dengan PRP maka tidak perlu dilanjutkan ke decision tree
- Decision tree refer to Codex CAC/RCP 1-1969, Rev.4-2003
Document No. : M-WINA/FSMS/001
Rev. :
Issue Date :
Effective. Date :
Page :
Penentuan CCP
(CCP Determination)
Decision Tree
Q1 Q1a Q2 Q3 Q4
General Control
- Specify dioxin as part of
the quality specification
-Must have dioxin analysis.
Y PRP
- Periodic Heavy metal
test as verivication, i.e.
at least once per year.
- Monitor CoA from supplier
CCP 1 PFAD Dioxin Dioxin’s Action limit = 0.5ng Dioxin in certificate of Every Plant Action : Call HACCP LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 No verification is
Purchase & (supply of WHOPCDD/FTEQ/kg PFAD analysis of the corresponding Executive / (1) if ‘results’ meeting for course of – 005 for in fact needed
Receiving Non-positive corresponding batch Sales Exceed Rejection limit action and review monitoring & since the
(Continue) Released Dioxin’s Rejection limit = 0.75 ng batch Manager (0.75ng/kg the supplier status verification “Positive
PFAD) WHOPCDD/FTEQ/kg releated PFAD plan ReleaseExcercise”
Note: batch is to be PFAD become “Positive is conducted at
Dioxin Internal accepted downgraded as release” if dioxin level is Certificate of VWFII
compounds Dioxin level = 0.6 ng WHOPCDD/ “Non-feed use”. below Action limit. If analysis by 3rd
Inciude : FTEQ/kg, Such PFAD would not, taken either Action party lab
· Di0xin During emergency case (see be either (i) rejected (1) & (2)
· Dioxinlike Note** at Corrective Actioncoloumn & returned to the
PCBs supplier or (ii) resell
· Non- it to other buyer for
Dioxin like “'non- feed use”.
PCBS
Based on (2) if results fall
COA results between Action limit
Over the (0.5ng/kg) and
years (since Rejection limit
2012), only (0.75ng/kg), VWFII
Dioxin is has the options of
“critical taking either action
hence only
Dioxin is
targeted for
CCP
FEED SAFETY MANUAL GMP+B2 Document No. :
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev. :
Issue Date :
RAW MATERIAL Effective. Date :
Page :
Action (2a)
Dilution with pesitive
release PFAD, shculd
we have access to
Verification for
other batches of
Action (2a)
positive released PFAD
the diluted
with Dioxin level
batch. should
≤0.5ng/kg for dilution
be verified
purpose.
by either (i)
The new diluted /
laboratory
blended batch must
Dioxin test of
have a lower Dioxin
the blended
level, ideally
PFAD or (ii)
≤0.5ng/kg; or at
Dioxin
internally acceptable
verification
Dioxin level, i.e.
on the finished
maximum 0.6ng/kg
products made
The new diluted /
from such
blended batch can be
blended PFAD.
released (24 hours
Targeted dioxin
after blending) for
compliance of
production use
the finished
based on dilution
product should
formulation (see
be < 0.75 ng/kg
QMQ(SP)/017) with
lf and when the
the preceding
blending
condition that the
formula is
verified later
and proof to be
reliable the
blelended does
not need to be
tested for
Dioxin again
FEED SAFETY MANUAL GMP+B2 Document No. :
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev. :
Issue Date :
RAW MATERIAL Effective. Date :
Page :
Occasionaly
No
Commonly
Signifikan
Very High
Un-Likely
Probable
(Process Step) Kategori Produk Akhir
(Is The Potential
High
(7.4.2)
Med
Bahaya Bahaya Potensial Sumber Bahaya
Low
(Hazard (Potensial Hazard) (Source of hazard) Hazard
Category) Significant)
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 PFAD Storagek (TK-F01 & TK- Biological - Insect rodent and pest Environment v v Not significant
F02) droppings
- Contamination through
external sources via opening
of Storage tank and loading
pipe at Pump house
5 CaO Storage (111B01A & Biological Insect and pest droppings Environment v v Not significant
111B01B)
4 BHT storage Biological Insects and pest droppings Environment v v Not significant
due to unhygienic of storage
area
14 Cooling Using Swivel Cooler Biological Flying insect, spider etc v v Not significant
Chemical Hydraulic oil from hydraulic v v Not significant
unit
Manhole of storage
tanks are closed and loading
pipe are covered when not in
use.
Pipeline is a close loop system
and, there is a strainer / filter
prior to tanks, and also there is a pest
control program in place
Y Y PRP
Working instruction 16
in FPW(MP)012 on Pull
test and Drop Test to
ensure magnetic
strainer/ grid is still
functioning Frequency
= monthly checking
Working instruction 16
in FPW (MP) 012 on Pull
Test and Drop Test to
ensure magnetic
strainer / grid is still
functioning. Frequency
= monthly checking
PFAD Storage tank in Dioxin due to Dioxin’s Dioxin in finished Certificate of Related & affected Plant executive / Case1 : When non-positive Certificate of Verivication
PH3 wrong transfer of Rejection limit = 0.75 ng WHO- product analysis on dioxin batch of finished Sales manager release PFAD is yet to be analysis by 3rd on case 1
Non-positive PCDD/FTEQ/kg product produced produced as finished party lab Verivication
release PFAD during first and product Discharge the non- on the finished
for production second 20 minutes positive release PFAD product
of production batch back to the closest produced
20minutes storage tank that can be during the first
production is isolated from thepositive two batch of
equivalent to 1.7MT release PFAD; if the 20 minute of
of finished affected volume permits production.
product produced E.g. Discharge non-positive If dioxin result
release PFAD from PFAD <0.75ng/kg,
Day Tank to PH3 PFAD fnished
Storage Tank and lock out product is
the acceptable
wrong PFAD from if Dioxin result
contacting the positive >0.75ng/kg,
release PFAD. reject and
Flush out the wrong PFAD dispose the
in pipeline using Pigging affected
misile. These flushout finished
PFAD can be considered product or
as part of nonpositive rework
release PFAD Reworked
product need
to be tested
again for
Dioxin, so to
verify rework rate and act as
a basis for
releasing the
product for
sales.
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE +B2 Document No.
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev.
Issue Date
PRODUCTION PROCESS CALCIUM SOAP Effective. Date
Page
POA 2 Over dosage ±0.15% of Weight (kg) Using Once for 1 batch Plant Hold Blending Process. LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 Monthly stock
BHT of BHT specification PFAD standart PFAD blend operator Calibrate Weighing Scale. – 001 reference
addition to (Chemical) addition weight before for monitoring
PFAD production records
LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18
– 002
for verification
BHT stock
reference
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE +B2 Document No.
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev.
Issue Date
PRODUCTION PROCESS CALCIUM SOAP Effective. Date
Page
CCP1 Metal 1. 3.5 mm-Fe Pass Using Using test Once a shift foreman/ Repeat till metal detector For daily record on - Yearly
Metal Detection (25kg residues 2. 4.5 mm- Non Fe test piece or operator sensitivity is confirmed and calibration calibration
bagging line) (physical) 3. 5.0 mm- SS sensitivity before restored. LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 - Verify on
piece start up production lf repeatedly fail, halt – 003, the
test production / packing. Hold for FRPD (form record monitoring
products until problem is process detection) on records
solved. metal once a shift.
Re-scan previous batches detection Responsible :
when problem is solved. LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 Foreman production
lf metal detection is found – 008. Head of department.
in product during re-scan,
the affected product is to
be screened through
portable magnet at rework
station (at screw conveyor)
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE +B2 Document No.
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev.
Issue Date
PRODUCTION PROCESS CALCIUM SOAP Effective. Date
Page
3) Assessment of past
monitoring results
showing no alarming
trend on presence of
metal pieces / metal
dust on Magnet
4) Records shown metal
detector has been
passing sensitivity
tests
Altemative Measure which
is The Enhanced and
Cleaning Program:
- Ensure magnet #1
passes verivication of
Magnetic strength test
before start of
Alternative Measures
- Keep production going
but have to check
Magnet # 1 located
after Screw Conveyor
(25kg bagging
line) every 2
hours as production
commence. If found
metal dust / metal
pieces, record findings
and clean magnet by
blowing it using
pressurized air.
- Records findings and
remedy action in
LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 –
003
- Cleanliness of
Magnetic plate at
every bucket elevator &
before swivel cooler tank
are also
being monitored once a
2 week.
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE +B2 Document No.
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev.
Issue Date
PRODUCTION PROCESS CALCIUM SOAP Effective. Date
Page
So to enhance magnetic
removal of any metal
dust / metal pieces
Continue verifying magnetic
strength of Magnet as
on SOP in SOP/VWFII-
PROD-18-010 for
every 2 weeks.
Alternative Measure to be
halted when
a) VWFII found spare unit
of Metal Detector
b) Metal detector
problem is rectified.
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE +B2 Document No.
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev.
Issue Date
PRODUCTION PROCESS CALCIUM SOAP Effective. Date
Page
CCP2 Metal 1. 3.5 mm-Fe Pass Using Using test Once a shift foreman/ Repeat till metal detector For daily record on - Yearly
Metal Detection (650 kg residues 2. 4.5 mm- Non Fe test piece or operator sensitivity is confirmed and calibration calibration
bagging line) (Physical) 3. 5.0 mm- SS sensitivity before restored. LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 - Verify on
piece start up production lf repeatedly fail, halt – 003, the
test production / packing. Hold for FRPD (form record monitoring
products until problem is process detection) on records
solved. metal once a shift.
Re-scan previous batches detection Responsible :
when problem is solved. LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 Foreman production
lf metal detection is found – 008. Head of department.
in product during re-scan,
the affected product is to
be screened through
portable magnet at rework
station (at screw conveyor)
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE +B2 Document No.
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev.
Issue Date
PRODUCTION PROCESS CALCIUM SOAP Effective. Date
Page
3) Assessment of past
monitoring results
showing no alarming
trend on presence of
metal pieces / metal
dust on Magnet
4) Records shown metal
detector has been
passing sensitivity
tests
Altemative Measure which
is The Enhanced and
Cleaning Program:
- Ensure magnet #1
passes verivication of
Magnetic strength test
before start of
Alternative Measures
- Keep production going
but have to check
Magnet # 1 located
after Screw Conveyor
(25kg bagging
line) every 2
hours as production
commence. If found
metal dust / metal
pieces, record findings
and clean magnet by
blowing it using
pressurized air.
- Records findings and
remedy action in
LOG/VWFII - PROD - 18 –
003
- Cleanliness of
Magnetic plate at
every bucket elevator &
before swivel cooler tank
are also
being monitored once a
2 week.
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE +B2 Document No.
CALCIUM SOAP DEPARTEMENT Rev.
Issue Date
PRODUCTION PROCESS CALCIUM SOAP Effective. Date
Page
So to enhance magnetic
removal of any metal
dust / metal pieces
Continue verifying magnetic
strength of Magnet as
on SOP in SOP/VWFII-
PROD-18-010 for
every 2 weeks.
Alternative Measure to be
halted when
a) VWFII found spare unit
of Metal Detector
b) Metal detector
problem is rectified.
HACCP PLANT TABLE FEED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Occasional
Commonly
Very High
Un-Likely
(Is The Potential
Probable
Bahaya Bahaya Potensial Sumber Bahaya (7.4.2)
Hazard Significant)
High
Med
Low
(Hazard (Potensial Hazard) (Source of hazard)
y
Category)
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 Calcium Soap Biological None. Not possible source
Reject & Storge of introduction
For Rework
Product Type 1
For Rework
Product Type 2
Decision Tree
Referensi Undang-undang, (Based on Codex) Referensi Undang-undang,
OPRP / CCP
Standar Industri, dan/atau Control Measures Standar Industri, dan/atau
Alasan kontrak perjanjian *Jika bahaya bisa dikendalikan Referensi Dokumen kontrak perjanjian
(Justification) (Legislation, Industry dengan PRP maka tidak perlu (Document Reference) (Legislation, Industry
Standard, and/or Contract dilanjutkan ke decision tree Standard, and/or Contract
Terms Reference) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Terms Reference)
Table 1. Risk Ranking Scheme based upon severity of risk and probability of hazard as decsribed by Bovee et al (1997)
(Bovee, E.H.G.; de Kruijf, N.; Jetten, J. & Barendsz, A.W. HACCP Approach to Ensure the Safety and Quality of Food Packaging. Food Additives and Contaminants.17(6-7), 721-735. 1997)
Severity Likelihood
Likelihood
non-significant
(controlled by PRPs)
Low (1) 2 3 4 5
significant
Medium (2) 3 4 5 (controlled by OPRPs 6
Severity or CCPs)
High (3) 4 5 6 7
2014-01-29 - HACCP: Identification of CCP, CP, PRP, oPRP in the standards IFS, BRC, ISO 22000 – practical examples