THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Case No. CV-2019-067886

SOUTHWEST DELAWARE COUNTY

MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY,

Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo,

__________________________________/

AFFIDAVIT OF FACT CHALLENGING AUTHORITY AND

NOTICE TO COURT OF CRIMINAL FRAUD

1. I, Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo am before this Court by “Special Appearance”, without

waiving any rights, remedies, or defenses, protected and secured by the Constitution of

Pennsylvania and the Constitution of the United States of America.

2. I have the right to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me

God; and have done so in the form of the attached Notarized Affidavit.

3. I have the right to make my record without sale, denial or delay as “All courts shall be

open; and every man for an injury done him in his lands, goods, person or reputation

shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale,

denial or delay.” Constitution of Pennsylvania Article 1 § 11. Courts to be open; suits

against the Commonwealth.

4. I reserve all of my God-given rights as a man, secured and protected by the Constitution

of the United States of America, and direct the Clerk to perform only a ministerial

function, that the clerk not perform any tribunal functions, and that the clerk file the
 attached Affidavit for the Court record.

5. The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2),

establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made

under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over

any conflicting state laws. It provides that state courts are bound by, and state

constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law.

18 USC §1512 (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly

persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading
conduct toward another person, with intent to - (1) influence, delay, or prevent
the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any
person to -- (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other
object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an
object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an
official proceeding; … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
20 years, or both. (3) … (c) Whoever corruptly—(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or
conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent
to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or
attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20
years, or both.

18 USC § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally – (a) Whoever

willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or
attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record,
proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with
any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or
with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the
custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other
thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies,
or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
 three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding
any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office”
does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed
Forces of the United States.

I CERTIFY that a copy of the attached Affidavit was served via USPS certified mail to John
Michael Sheridan, 230 N. Monroe Street, Media, Pennsylvania, 19063, - receipt #7019 2970
0001 5737 9142); and to the Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority, One Gamble
Lane, P.O. Box 2466, Aston, Pennsylvania 19014, - receipt #7019 2970 0001 5737 9166, this
12th day of September 2020. I also certify that the foregoing, upon acceptance will
immediately be mailed to the Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority and John
Michael Sheridan.

___________
Responsible Party and Holder in Due Course, 610-818-7167
 Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo 
713 Lamp Post Lane  
Aston, Pennsylvania 19014 
 
In The Matter of Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo, Case CV-2019-067886    
 
 
To:  
 
The Delaware County Court of Common  
Pleas and all parties in interest, 
 
 
AFFIDAVIT OF FACT CHALLENGING AUTHORITY 
AND NOTICE TO COURT OF CRIMINAL FRAUD  
 
Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo, who, 
being by me duly sworn, deposed as follows: “My name is Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo 
(hereinafter I, me, my, myself), and am of sound mind and capable of making this Affidavit of 
Fact. I have created this Affidavit to establish the true facts of this matter, because Case 
CV-2019-067886 lacks the standard of regularity and was initiated by the use of force, threat, 
duress, hearsay, and fraud; and I aver and will testify to the following facts:” 
 
1. I, Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo am before this Court by “Special Appearance”, without  
 
waiving any rights, remedies, or defenses, statutorial or procedural.  
 
2. I reserve all my rights as a man, secured by the original Constitution of 1776-1777, and  
 
the the original Constitution of Pennsylvania of 1776, which secured the God given rights  
 
of all men, opposed to persons, corporations, et al., and is with discrimination; but we the  
 
people as secured parties are now under hardship by the B.A.R. Associations as to legal  
 
disabilities due to discrimination and violation under their color of law. I have been  
 
informed that this violation under their color of law violates [“Title 18 U.S.C. Sections  
 
 241, 242, and Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983.”] 
 
COLOR OF LAW. “The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal 
right.” Black’s Law Dictionary 4th edition 
 
3. I, Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo, am the sole responsible party and holder in due  
 
course, for the Private Property known as 713 Lamp Post Lane, Aston, Pennsylvania;  
 
hereinafter Estate. 
 
PRIVATE PROPERTY: “As protected from being taken for public uses, is such 
property as belongs absolutely to an individual, and of which he has the exclusive 
right of disposition; property of a specific, fixed and tangible nature, capable of 
being had in possession and transmitted to another, such as houses, lands, and 
chattels.” Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition  
 
4. This court WILL take judicial notice that I hold the utmost respect for the courts of this  
 
state and of this nation; however, I do distinguish between the court and an officer of the  
 
court and as to the latter, neither my respect nor my contempt is freely given; it must be  
 
earned. 
 
5. The Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, hereinafter Court has no personal  
 
jurisdiction of myself and no subject matter jurisdiction of my Estate. In order for this  
 
Court to have jurisdiction, a real Plaintiff must exist, and must be a real party in interest  
 
with standing. The Plaintiff is a Fiction of Law that can’t have standing and Under  
 
Article 3 Section 2 of the Constitution, Standing is a threshold issue. This Court has  
 
proceeded without jurisdiction or consent, through the use of force, threat, and duress,  
 
against myself and my Estate. 
 
6. The Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority is a Fictitious Plaintiff, a “dead  
 
entity” that can’t be a competent witness and can’t make a claim against myself and my  
 
Estate. John Michael Sheridan by claiming to speak for a “dead entity” was in  
 
non-compliance of Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 601 - Competency to Testify in  
 
General, as he cannot speak or testify for a “dead entity”. 
 
FICTITIOUS PLAINTIFF. “A person appearing in the writ or record as the 
plaintiff in a suit, but who in reality does not exist, or who is ignorant of the suit 
and of the use of his name in it. It is a contempt of court to sue in the name of a 
fictitious party.” Black’s Law Dictionary 4th edition. 
 
7. I have no commercial contract or confession of judgement contract, with John Michael  
 
Sheridan, the Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority, or the Delaware County  
 
Court of Common Pleas, in which I’ve granted said parties the right to enter a judgement  
 
against myself or my Estate. This Case CV-2019-067886 is non compliant with the  
 
“Pennsylvania Statute of Frauds”, as there is no existing contract for which a debt  
 
could’ve been created and converted into a lien. 
  
8. I am the sole Responsible Party and Holder in Due Course for this Estate and I have  
 
never been provided any evidence of another party having a secured interest in my Estate,  
 
nor have I granted another party a secured interest in my Estate. Any such claims  
 
constitute hearsay and fraud.  
 
9. Agency cannot be proven out of the mouth of the agent, it must be proven out of the 
 
mouth of the principal. There’s no Affidavit and no witness testimony presented by a  
 
 real Person acting as the principal for the Southwest Delaware County Municipal  
 
Authority, that has verified anything John Michael Sheridan has filed, done, or stated.  
 
In addition there’s no evidence that Sheridan possesses a Power of Attorney from a real  
 
party operating as the Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority, that has been  
 
dated, signed by the principal, witnessed by two adults, and notarized, as is mandatory in  
 
Pennsylvania. Absent a contract to the contrary, Sheridan appears to be acting of his  
 
own accord which constitutes fraud against myself and my Estate. 
 
AGENCY, contracts. An agreement, express , or implied, by which one of the 
parties, called the principal, confides to the other, denominated the agent, the 
management of some business; to be transacted in his name, or on his account, 
and by which the agent assumes to do the business and to render an account of it. 
As a general rule, whatever a man do by himself, except in virtue of a delegated 
authority, he may do by an agent. 
 
PRINCIPAL, contracts. One who, being competent to contract, and who is sui 
juris, employs another to do any act for his own benefit, or on his own account. 
 
SUI JURIS. One who has all the rights to which a freemen is entitled; one who is 
not under the power of another, as a slave, a minor, and the like. 
 
10. The officers of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, hereinafter Court, have 
 
abridged and modified my substantive rights, by 1) accepting a case filed in the name of  
 
a fictitious plaintiff; 2) by issuing a judgement and a writ of scire facias, without  
 
providing me my right to due process of law and a trial by jury; 3) by denying Motions to  
 
Dismiss that were un-opposed by the alleged plaintiff; and 4) acting in non-compliance of  
 
the Constitution of Pennsylvania Article 1 Section 6 - Trial by Jury, and Pennsylvania  
 
 Statute Title 42 Pa.C.S.A. - Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 1722.  
 
§ 6. Trial by jury 
“Trial by jury shall be as heretofore, and the right thereof remain inviolate.” 
 
Pennsylvania Statute Title 42 Pa.C.S.A. - Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 
1722 
(a)(1) Practice, procedure and the conduct of all courts, magisterial 
district judges and all officers serving process or enforcing orders of any 
court or magisterial district judge and for admission to the bar and to 
practice law, and the administration of all courts and the supervision of 
all officers of the judicial branch, i​ f such rules are consistent with the 
Constitution of Pennsylvania and neither abridge, enlarge nor modify the 
substantive rights of any litigant​, nor affect the right of the General 
Assembly to determine the jurisdiction of any court or magisterial district 
judge, nor suspend nor alter any statute of limitation or repose. All 
statutes shall be suspended to the extent that they are inconsistent with 
rules prescribed under this paragraph. 
 
11. Acting in felony breach of fiduciary duty, officers of this Court have acted in a criminal 
 
conspiracy to take private property without just compensation and without due process of  
 
law, violating by specific intent the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of The United  
 
States of America; even as in using force, threat, and duress, to force me to participate in  
 
this sham, color of law, proceeding, filed in the name of a Fictitious Plaintiff, in a matter  
 
where no contract exists and no crime has been committed. This sham, color of law,  
 
proceeding, having been brought solely by the hearsay pleading of an Attorney with no  
 
evidence of having a plaintiff as a client, no standing, no witnesses, no evidence, no  
 
personal knowledge of the matter; lacking any valid and verified contractual instrument  
 
proving that a debt was owed, and the Court conspiring with John Michael Sheridan by  
 
 violating every aspect of my right to due process of law by issuing judgements  
 
orders,and a writ of scire facias, while depriving me of a notice and opportunity to  
 
defend myself in a Trial by Jury. It is plain and clear that said violations of the  
 
Constitution are but one facet of the B.A.R. TERRORISTS acting in collusion to  
 
overthrow the Constitution of The United States of America in the nature of sedition and  
 
treason, and acting under the Color of Law. 
 
12. Without waiving any other remedy or right, I, Alphonso-Nicholas Faggiolo, the sole 
 
Responsible Party and Holder in Due Course, have seen no evidence on the record that  
 
any real Person operating as the Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority  
 
directed and granted John Michael Sheridan authority to file Case CV-2019-067886, as  
 
no such Person acting as the Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority has  
 
verified anything that Sheridan has filed. Sheridan appears to have filed the foregoing  
 
Case against myself and my Estate of his own accord, in the name of a Fictitious  
 
Plaintiff, which is fraud and a contempt of the Court. Absent verification to the contrary,  
 
I hereby and herein make this substantive challenge as a matter of right as to associated  
 
fundamental principles of Due Process and LAW, both State and Federal. Lawful proof  
 
of the authority of John Michael Sheridan, the Southwest Delaware County Municipal  
 
Authority, and of the Officers of this Court, to take any actions against myself and my  
 
Estate, is hereby demanded, and if there is any subrogation and/or insurable interest, that  
 
the actual policies are made available to me at least ten days in advance of any hearing  
  
and also produced on the record, and put into evidence with full disclosure as to whom is  
 
covered, and for what specific acts; thus no appearance by Sheridan should be permitted  
 
until this matter is settled. The only hearing necessary would be one to ascertain the  
 
relevant evidence, after which, if authority can be shown, the Court shall then declare  
 
specifically whether it presumes that Sheridan is an employee OR independent  
 
contractor. I demand full disclosure of what Sheridan’s fees are with each party with any  
 
and all costs being disclosed since attorneys have been found to have two sets of  
 
accounting, as in $150 / hour if the clients lose and have to pay OR $300 / hour if the  
 
opposing party is ordered to pay. If Sheridan can’t provide evidence of authority, I  
 
demand a criminal investigation be ordered. 
 
13. I hereby and herein make my Offer of Proof set forth in this Affidavit of Fact that John  
 
Michael Sheridan has by his own actions verified his intent to violate his oath to the  
 
Constitutions and act in non-compliance of Pennsylvania Statute Title 42 Pa.C.S.A.  
 
Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 2522 - Oath of office; and proceed with involvement  
 
in the cover up of criminal acts, in the nature of acting with specific intent, through the  
 
use of coercion by the threat of force of arms, and other CRIMES executed by specific  
 
intent in the nature of Deceptive Trade Practices, acting ultra vires in this ongoing  
 
scheme which still has the potential to commit even more crimes, when no such criminal  
 
activity can ever be a covered peril in any insurance policy. 
 
 14. I have a firm, good faith reliance that officers of this Court have executed oaths to  
 
support both State and Federal Constitutions, and to uphold the law. I have a firm, good  
 
faith reliance that officers of the Court are educated, trained, paid, and sworn to uphold  
 
the law. Officers of the Court are required to report criminal activity as promptly as they  
 
become aware of it. I have been defrauded by officers of this Court with specific intent,  
 
since they have no excuse such as ignorance of the Constitutions and laws that bind them. 
 
15. The Constitutions guarantee a republican form of government, however I have been  
 
criminally defrauded by pettifogger shysters groveling for filthy lucre utilizing  
 
democratic, a/k/a “Mob Rule” statutes, depriving me of my unalienable God-given rights  
 
in an attempt to overthrow the Constitution of The United States of America in the nature  
 
of sedition and treason. 
 
PETTIFOGGER. “An inferior legal practitioner, especially one who deals with 
petty cases or employs dubious practices.” 
 
SHYSTER. “A person, especially a lawyer, who uses unscrupulous, fraudulent, or 
deceptive methods in business.” 
 
LUCRE. “Money, especially when regarded as sordid or distasteful or gained in 
a dishonorable way.” 
 
16. The cornerstone to due process is a notice and opportunity to defend oneself before any  
 
judgement is issued. Absent evidence to the contrary of a proper notice served to me, I  
 
was absolutely deprived of the opportunity to defend myself and my Estate. Lies, fraud,  
 
deceit, shyster shenanigans, and other treachery fail as to proper notice. 
 
17. Once due process is denied all jurisdiction ceases as per your very own 5 USC §§ 556(d),  
 
557, 706. Judges have no immunity as per your very own Owen v. City of Independence,  
 
100 S Ct. 1398; Maine v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21;  
 
judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; judges cannot claim  
 
to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of  
 
the law, even I cannot plead ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for a learned judge to  
 
plead ignorance of the law, therefore there is no judicial immunity in matters of rights  
 
secured by the Constitution of the United States of America. See: Title 42 USC § 1983  
 
and Federal Tort Claims Act exception for unconstitutional acts, as well as 18 USC §§  
 
241/242. 
 
18. The Declaration of Independence provides that all men are created equal and that men  
 
created governments to secure the individual rights of men, not of municipal  
 
corporations, corporations, body politics, et al. This is also provided in the Constitution  
 
of Pennsylvania, Article 1 Section 1 - Inherent Rights of Mankind, and Article 1 Section  
 
2 - Political Powers. My rights as a man, against my constant protest and notice to the  
 
parties, have been trampled by John Michael Sheridan, the Southwest Delaware County  
 
Municipal Authority, and the Court. 
 
19. Pursuant to the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of Pennsylvania Article 1 §  
 
1 - Inherent Rights of Mankind and Article 1 § 2 - Political Powers, B.A.R  
 
TERRORISTS acting as quislings attempting to overthrow the Constitution of The  
  
United States of America and the Constitution of Pennsylvania in the nature of sedition  
 
and treason, cannot claim to be more equal than myself. In other words, their purported  
 
claims to titles of nobility and immunity fail to be anything but evidence of being  
 
intoxicated with delusions of grandeur requiring professional mental health care, or in  
 
the case of the incorrigible, closely supervised activity such as breaking rocks on the  
 
chain gang. 
 
Quisling. “A traitor who collaborates with the invaders of his country, especially 
by serving in a puppet government.” 
 
20. It is plain and clear that the First Amendment provides “Congress shall make no law  
 
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...”.  
 
Federal Public Law 97-280, 96 Stat. 1211 provides that the Bible is the Word of God  
 
and plainly declares that we should apply its teaching in our lives, and I was and am  
 
doing so now. 
 
21. Judge Edith Jones of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, told the Federalist  
 
Society of the Harvard Law School on February 28, 2003, “The first 100 years of  
 
American lawyers were trained on Blackstone, who wrote that: ‘The law of nature ...  
 
dictated by God himself... is binding ... in all counties and at all times; no human laws are  
 
of any validity if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all force and all  
 
their authority ... from this original.” 
 
22. "One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin  
  
that he sinneth: at the mouth of two or more witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses,  
 
shall the matter be established. If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against  
 
him that which is wrong; Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall  
 
stand before the Lord, before the priests and judges, which shall be in those days; And  
 
the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness,  
 
and hath testified falsely against his brother; Then shall ye do unto him as he had thought  
 
to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. And those  
 
which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil  
 
among you. And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for  
 
tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot." Deuteronomy 19:15-21. 
 
 
23. The Court either erred or committed fraud on 10/23/2019 when it accepted John Michael  
 
Sheridan’s 10/16/2019 filing, made in the name of a Fictitious Plaintiff/Claimant  
 
-Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority. 
 
24. Attorney John Michael Sheridan committed fraud upon the Court, fraud upon myself, and  
 
fraud upon my Estate, when he filed a petition for a Writ of Scire Facias on 10/23/2019,  
 
to collect on a non-existent, falsified debt, for a Fictitious Plaintiff/Claimant, that had  
 
never been adjudicated in a Trial by Jury. 
 
25. The Court either erred or committed fraud on 10/23/2019 when the Clerk, unknown to  
 
me as the signature is illegible; and a second party, also unknown to me, as the signature  
  
is illegible, somehow granted John Michael Sheridan’s petition for a Writ of Scire Facias,  
 
in the name of a Fictitious Plaintiff (fraud), for a falsified lien counterfeited by Sheridan  
 
(fraud), that was never adjudicated in a Trial by Jury (fraud); which was non-compliant  
 
with Constitution of Pennsylvania, Article 1 Section 6.  
 
COUNTERFEIT. In criminal law. To forge; to copy or imitate, without authority 
or right, and with a view to deceive or defraud, by passing the copy or thing 
forged for that which is original or genuine. 
 
26. Neither John Michael Sheridan, nor the officers of the Court, have authority or right to  
 
impose the Pennsylvania Municipalities Act or the Pennsylvania Tax Lien Law, upon  
 
myself and/or my Estate; two written instruments that I am not a signatory to and have  
 
not consented to. It’s self evident that if the statutes were applied to I -a man, they would  
 
violate due process of law, in addition to several Sections of Article 1 of the Constitution  
 
of Pennsylvania, which would constitute crimes against myself and my Estate.  
 
27. John Michael Sheridan has stated, ​“Additionally, Counsel for Claimant has been  
 
provided information from Claimant’s Administrator with knowledge concerning the  
 
matters relating to this municipal claim.​”. Sheridan’s claim is hearsay and fraud, as I’ve  
 
been provided no verification by the Administrator of the Southwest Delaware County  
 
Municipal Authority that they have personal knowledge or that they possess records of  
 
any witnesses with personal knowledge that the Authority’s statutes, codes, and laws  
 
apply to myself or my Estate.  
 
28. The only Administrator for the Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority that I  
 
am aware of is Cecelia Nelson, who in an Affidavit provided to me, stated, ​“I, Cecelia  
 
Nelson, at all times relevant, have served as the Administrator for the Southwest  
 
Delaware County Municipal Authority. In my capacity as Authority Administrator I have  
 
personal knowledge that the Authority does not have in existence a record that contains  
 
or lists the names and titles of witnesses with personal, firsthand, knowledge, that the  
 
Authority’s statutes, codes, and laws apply to Mr. Faggiolo”. 
  
29. It is self-evident that the I, a man, am endowed with rights from my Creator -Almighty  
 
God, not from constitutions, statutes, ordinances, codes, et al. which were created by  
 
other men with rights that can never supercede my rights as, ​“All men are born equally  
 
free and independent”.​ The Constitutions only protect and secure my God-given rights  
 
from those that call themselves government, and from municipal corporations  
 
masquerading as governments. 
 
“WE, the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God 
for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance, 
do ordain and establish this Constitution.” Preamble Constitution of 
Pennsylvania 
 
Constitution of Pennsylvania Article 1 § 1. “Inherent rights of mankind. 
All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent and 
indefeasible rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and 
liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property and reputation, and of 
pursuing their own happiness.” 
 
30. I am a natural born flesh and blood man -not a legal Person, corporation, et al. God  
 
 created man, man created government, and government created Persons and corporations.  
 
I am not a creation of government. 
 
PERSON. “In law, man and person are not exactly-synonymous terms. Any 
human being is a man, whether he be a member of society or not, whatever may 
be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, sex, &c. A person is a man 
considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which 
the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes.” Bouvier Law 
Dictionary 1856 
 
31. I rebut all presumptions and all public records that are not verified by the wet signature of  
 
its creator and not supported by a valid contract containing my wet signature. Any  
 
presumptions and any public records not verified by a wet signature of its creator and  
 
not supported by a valid contract containing my wet signature are deemed to be fraud,  
 
misrepresentation, counterfeit, and hearsay. 
 
32. The only court authorized by the referenced Constitutions to hear any matters, concerning  
 
the Affiant and his Estate, is a “court of record” that conforms to and functions in  
 
accordance with Article III Section 2 of the referenced Constitution, in which all officers  
 
of the court abide by their sworn and subscribed oaths of office, to support and defend the  
 
Constitution, therefore protecting and securing my right to Due Process of Law  
 
and my, inviolate, right to a Trial by Jury.  
 
33. This Case CV-2019- 067886 is in an “Improper Venue” as all Courts in Pennsylvania are  
 
“Courts of Record”. This Court is not operating as a Court of Record as a Court of  
 
Record: 1) possesses the power to fine or imprison for contempt; 2) keeps a record of  
 
 the proceedings; 3) proceeds according to the Common Law; 4) the Magistrate is  
 
Independent of the Tribunal; and 5) has a Seal.  
 
34. The Court never issued me Service of Process, denying me a notice and opportunity to  
 
defend myself and my Estate against Case CV-2019-067886. This was non-compliant  
 
with due process of law and constituted fraud committed against myself and my Estate. 
 
35. I’ve had John Michael Sheridan and officers of the Court cite a Judgement that is  
 
non-existent, missing, or has been willfully omitted or removed from the Court docket.  
 
I’ve had no notice and opportunity to defend against this fraudulent, alleged Judgement,  
 
which violated my right to Due Process of Law and my inviolate right to a Trial by Jury.  
 
Absent a Trial by Jury, no Officer of the Court had authority to issue a Judgement against  
 
myself and my Estate; this was non-compliant with Constitution of Pennsylvania Article  
 
1 Section 6 -Trial by Jury, and constituted hearsay and fraud against myself and my  
 
Estate, and may constitute the crime of concealment, removal, or mutilation generally, -  
 
18 U.S. Code § 2071.   
 
36. The Court allowed Attorney John Michael Sheridan to cite a non-existent Certification  
 
from a party named “Treasurer”. No party named Treasurer had authority or right to  
 
certify anything involving myself and my Estate. No party named Treasurer had personal  
 
knowledge of any matter involving myself and my Estate. Any Certification, if one  
 
existed, by a party named Treasurer, would constitute hearsay, counterfeiting, and fraud,  
 
committed against myself and my Estate. 
  
37. I’ve had John Michael Sheridan and officers of the Court cite a Certification that is  
 
non-existent, missing, or has been willfully omitted or removed from the Court docket.  
 
I’ve had no notice and opportunity to defend against this fraudulent, alleged Certification,  
 
which violated my right to due process of law. Absent the testimony of the party to the  
 
contrary, that created this alleged Certification, this constituted hearsay and fraud, and  
 
may constitute the crime of concealment, removal, or mutilation generally, - 18 U.S.  
 
Code § 2071.   
 
38. The Court issued a Notice without a signed Judgement attached. This was non-compliant  
 
with its own Rule of Civil Procedure 236, and constitutes fraud committed against myself  
 
and my Estate. I’ve been provided no evidence of who executed the judgement or where  
 
they derived authority to issue anything against myself and my Estate, which violates due  
 
process of law. 
 
39. The Court has allowed Attorney John Michael Sheridan to unlawfully act as both the  
 
Plaintiff and Council. Sheridan is an interloper acting on his own accord, with no  
 
standing, no personal knowledge, and no real client that is a Plaintiff. This was  
 
non-compliant with Due Process of Law and constituted fraud committed against myself  
 
and my Estate. 
 
40. The Court allowed Attorney John Michael Sheridan to speak for a Fictitious Plaintiff and  
 
answer Motions filed by me. Sheridan, a party with no standing and no personal  
 
 knowledge, submitted answers to my Motions by claiming to speak and act for a Fiction  
 
of Law, that was hearsay and fraud.   
 
41. The Court allowed Attorney John Michael Sheridan to make an appearance at a Motion  
 
hearing on 3/3/2020, and to speak for a Fictitious Plaintiff, while slandering myself  
 
through hearsay and fraud. Sheridan was not a qualified witness, had no personal  
 
knowledge of any matter involving myself and my Estate, and when I repeatedly objected  
 
to Sheridan making statements and testifying in Court against myself and my Estate, per  
 
Sheridan’s non-compliance with Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 602 - Need for Personal  
 
Knowledge, the Court continually overruled me. This was also non-compliant with Due  
 
Process of Law and constituted fraud committed against myself and my Estate.  
 
42. The Court is granting Attorney John Michael Sheridan yet another scheduled  
 
hearing on 9/22/2020. Sheridan has no evidence of having a Plaintiff, no witnesses, no  
 
party claiming an injury or the violation of a right, no verified commercial debt  
 
instrument, no standing in the matter, no personal knowledge of the matter, and no  
 
evidence that any debt exists. This is non-compliant with Due Process of Law as I can’t  
 
defend myself against a Fictitious Plaintiff and a non-existent debt instrument. This  
 
constitutes fraud being committed against myself and my Estate. 
 
43. I am not an expert in the law however I do know right from wrong. If there is any human  
 
being damaged by any statements herein, if they will inform me by facts I will sincerely  
 
make every effort to amend my ways. I hereby and herein reserve the right to amend and