HIST 1421 Written Assignment Unit 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Written Assignment Unit 1: The political life in Athens and Sparta

University of the People

HIST 1421: GREEK AND ROMAN CIVILIZATION

September 9, 2020
The political life in Athens and Sparta

Being two very different poleis (City-states) with completely different government structures, the

ways in which the people of those two poleis participated in public life differs greatly.

Sparta

In order to be able to participate in the decision making which affected their community the

Spartans had to be male, freeborn citizens. (Brand, n.d).

Being a dictatorship, the regular spartan citizen did not have any direct say in the matters of the

state, and the only way in which they really participated in the political life was by being part of

the assembly, which gathered monthly and had the power to elect the higher ranking officials of

the state (Ephors and Gerousia) as well as discuss whatever matters those higher ranking officials

deemed to be “suitable” for the assembly to discuss.

The Spartan government structure was such that no one single person held the public office, so it

was not a complete monarchy. However, only a small select group of people actually had the

power to make actual decisions over the important matters of the state. Those were the two

kings, who were part of the Ephors – a total of 5 people (incl. the kings) elected annually by the

Assembly, whos’ duties included “judicial affairs, military organization and foreign relations”

(Brand, n.d, p.10).

The two kings were also part of the Gerousia – which was a council of 30 members, who were

part of the council for life. In order to be part of it, the members had to be at least 60 years old

and of aristocratic status. The Gerousia would decide which matters the general assembly could

vote on and participate in. The Ephors would also often come for the Gerousia’s advice.
Athens

The Athenian democracy allowed for far more involvement of the regular people in everyday

political matters.

However, even then in order for their voice to be heard those regular people had to comply with

certain criteria in order to be considered “citizens” of Athens: They had to be male, they had to

be free (not slaves) and they had to be native-Athenians (Metics were not considered citizens).

With the exclusion of these 3 classes, only a ¼ of the residents of Athens were actually allowed

to participate in public life. (Arzamas.2017)

Even with democratic rule, the political rights of the Athenians were determined by their wealth.

(Brand, n.d)

The richest “could seek the highest political offices, including the 10 annually elected Generals

who were the primary military and civilian officers.” (Brand, n.d, p.29)

The power of the classes underneath diminished in accordance with their income and

possessions, with the poorest not even being eligible to join the actual army but only to row the

navy ships. (Brand, n.d)

Conclusion

Political life in Athens and Sparta could not have looked more different, with Sparta being ruled

by only a select few, and Athens allowing it’s citizens a far greater public voice.

However both poleis were similar in the fact neither allowed citizenship rights to either women

or slaves and with the highest public office positions held by those with the most money. Which
makes us think that the ancient democracy of Athens was not all that different from the Spartan

dictatorship. As neither allowed FULL freedom to ALL it’s residents.

Word count: 551 words

References:

Brand, P. J. (n.d.). Athens & Sparta: Democracy vs. Dictatorship. Retrieved

from https://my.uopeople.edu

Arzamas. (2017, May 30). Ancient Greece in 18 minutes [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved

from: https://youtu.be/gFRxmi4uCGo

You might also like