Mass Spectrometry in The Clinical Laboratory: Donald H. Chace
Mass Spectrometry in The Clinical Laboratory: Donald H. Chace
Mass Spectrometry in The Clinical Laboratory: Donald H. Chace
The chemical diversity of compounds that are and screening best espouses this concept.23 When MS
will probably be routinely analyzed using MS is methods are used correctly, with proper safeguards
extensive. MS-based clinical assays that provide and with communication of easily understood results
rapid, comprehensive, multicomponent analyses and to medical professionals, physicians will diagnose
maintain or improve sensitivity, selectivity, and disease more accurately and rapidly with a lower cost
accuracy25 will likely lead the growth of MS in clinical and higher benefit, thus improving the state-of-the-
laboratories. The use of stable isotopes in mass art of health care delivery. These facts do not neces-
spectrometric quantitative analyses will confer a sarily translate to increased use of MS in the clinical
technical advantage over other methodologies used laboratory. Some potential barriers to implementa-
in the clinical laboratory because of its inherent tion include reimbursement by health care payers,
accuracy and precision. Isotope dilution methods not the availability of significantly less expensive and
only improve precision and accuracy in many clinical easy-to-use albeit less accurate techniques such as
analyses but also potentially provide solutions for immunoassays, lack of physician acceptance or edu-
quality assurance, standardization, and interlabora- cation, poor assay availability, high costs at low
tory comparisons.26 LC-MS, MALDI-MS, and other volumes, and other negative influences that are
MS-based systems will be important for the mea- either economic or political.
surement of informative biomarkers such as protein
and gene fragments27 as GC/MS has proven to be a C. Scope of Review
powerful clinical tool for qualitative and quantitative
analysis of important small molecules. The number and type of clinically significant bio-
molecules and their analysis using MS are consider-
B. Laboratory Testing and Diagnosis of Disease able. These MS applications range from elements
such as iron and selenium to metabolites (such as
A physician presumes that the laboratory data phenylalanine and glucose) peptides, and proteins
provided to him/her are accurate and precise, vali- (such as insulin and hemoglobin) to large oligonucle-
dated, and subjected to rigorous quality assurance. otides (such as DNA and RNA fragments). Important
This presumption demands that the clinical chemist biomarkers may be compounds of endogenous origin
uses the most accurate methodologies available and produced by intermediary metabolism or xenobiotics
that a protocol is followed exactly. Each MS analysis produced by exogenous metabolism following drug
must be error-free because the information provided administration or environmental exposure. Clinical
affects an individual’s health and life. Obviously, the applications have also included biomedical research,
demands on the clinical mass spectrometrist are clinical toxicology,30,31 and other chemical disciplines
extraordinarily high. Every effort must be made to such as immunology, virology, bacteriology, and
prevent analytical inconsistencies, and methods re- oncology. It is impractical to cover every application
quire extensive validation.28 Furthermore, clinical of MS in clinical chemistry. Therefore, those applica-
assays must pass quality control and assurance tions that are currently practiced in clinical labora-
assessments before data can be used in clinical tories that will likely impact clinical analysis soon
practice.29 or that best illustrate the potential of mass spectro-
Raw MS results have no clinical significance to metric analysis will be emphasized. Referenced pub-
most physicians. Therefore, the clinical laboratory lications will primarily span 15 yr. Some older,
must develop extensive interpretation schemes that historically important or frequently cited papers32
clearly communicate pertinent laboratory testing will also be included, especially for applications using
information to a physician before this information can GC/MS. The clinical applications of MS will be
be useful to diagnose a disease in a patient. arranged in three basic groups: small metabolites
Expertise in the interpretation of mass spectro- such as organic acids, amino acids, fatty acids,
metric results does not reside in most routine clinical steroids and their conjugates;33 peptides, proteins,
laboratories. The effort required to implement an and glycoproteins;34,35 and oligonucleotides derived
interpretation and follow-up system for mass spec- from biopolymers (DNA, RNA). A brief discussion of
trometers is substantial. This is one reason that MS the quantitative aspects of MS, quality assurance,
has primarily resided in small reference laboratories and integration of MS in the clinical laboratory will
rather than large commercial clinical laboratories. In complete the review.
addition, information concerning false-positive and Of important note is the use of abbreviations and
false-negative rates provide reliability indicators to terminology. I have attempted to follow guidelines
the physician and should be provided with test written by O. David Sparkman in his text “Mass Spec
results. Methods with low false-positive rates enable Desk Reference”.7 The use of standardized terminol-
the clinician to respond more rapidly. Conversely, ogy is important for communication of meaning as
methods with high false-positive rates require time- seen in one recent example: MS/MS is now being
consuming repeat analysis to confirm a result. Labo- used by several newborn screening laboratories, and
ratory errors may result in a disease going undetec- there has been a recent trend among these users,
ted, delay a timely diagnosis, or raise health care many of whom are not classical chemists and mass
costs by requiring further tests or patient referrals. spectrometrists, to abbreviate tandem mass spec-
Clearly, the power of MS-based analysis is its inher- trometry as TMS. TMS is the abbreviation for trim-
ent accuracy. Precision will be the driving force for ethylsilyl, a type of chemical derivative used fre-
its use in the clinical laboratory. An Editorial by H. quently in the GC/MS analysis of organic acid
Levy that describes the use of MS/MS and newborn metabolites found in urine. Therefore, the currently
448 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
components of all peptides and proteins. In solution amounts of urea adversely affect chromatographic
at physiological pH, amino acids are dipolar (zwitter) and mass spectrometric analysis of several amino
ions. Amino acids are categorized as neutral, basic, acids. A solution to this problem has been the
or acidic by either their pKa or pKb values, which pretreatment of urine with urease, which reduces the
directly correlate with the composition of the R group. concentration of urea in a specimen.47,74 Due to their
Amino acids are the essential components of proteins. similarity and common derivatization schemes, or-
Twenty-two different amino acids have been found ganic acid and amino acid analysis have been com-
in varying amounts in human proteins. These and bined in a single analytic run.84
other important amino acids participate in interme- In addition to forming TMS derivatives, amino
diary metabolism and are precursors to active bio- acids can be converted to their tert-butyldimethylsilyl
molecules such as vitamins, nucleic acids, and neu- (TBDMS) derivatives.85 Also, a single-step esterifi-
rotransmitters. cation procedure, using ethyl chloroformate, has been
The primary source of amino acids for protein developed.86 Many GC/MS methods employ isotope
synthesis is dietary protein. Proteins are enzymati- dilution techniques for quantitative amino acid
cally converted to amino acids in the gastrointestinal analyses52,87-90 with excellent reproducibility and
tract (proteolysis), and are absorbed in blood, where precision. Ionization methods include electron impact
they are available to participate in catabolic and (EI) and chemical ionization (CI) for positive and
anabolic pathways. Approximately 10 of the 20 most negative ions.91 Modified amino acids have also been
common amino acids are essential amino acids and found in disease states, and their measurement was
must be obtained in the diet. Many amino acids are obtained with GC/MS; for example, identification of
readily interconverted to other amino acids by tran- N-acetyl amino acids in urine.92
samination. Metabolism includes conversion of amino
acids to ammonia and organic acids by deamination. 2. LC-MS Applications
Many inherited disorders of amino acid metabolism
a. MS/MS Applications. MS/MS was first used
are characterized by a significant elevation in the
in the clinical analysis of amino acids in plasma and
concentration of certain amino acids in blood (amino
blood, using liquid secondary ionization (fast ion
acidemias) and urine (amino acidurias), ammonia,
bombardment, FIB).24,93-95 The early studies required
and organic acids (organic acidemias).12,19,20 Abnor-
the use of manual sample introduction techniques.
mal concentrations of amino acids may also be found
Semi-automated flow injection,96 using FIB ioniza-
in blood or urine as a result of organ failure and
tion, was developed to facilitate automated sample
impaired function from disease or immature develop-
introduction and higher throughput. However, this
ment.21,82
method was somewhat tedious because of problems
HPLC and ion-exchange chromatography are the regarding sample retention on the probe tip and
predominant methods for quantitative amino acid frequent blockage in the capillary at the probe
analysis in clinical laboratories.11,21,38 Improved speci- surface. With the introduction of electrospray ioniza-
ficity can be achieved by combining chromatographic tion, significant improvement in sample throughput
and mass analysis with GC/MS. This approach is and automated sample analysis was realized.97-99
similar to that for organic acid analysis and requires ESI-MS/MS has been subsequently shown to be a
extensive sample preparation and derivatization. robust, rapid, and accurate method for rapid through-
More recently, MS/MS has been applied to the very put, high sample volume, and amino acid analyses
rapid screening for amino acids.54 This method of as demonstrated by validated methods used success-
analysis requires no chromatography and is accurate, fully in newborn screening or clinical amino acid
sensitive, and selective. IDMS techniques are used analyses.2,98-105
in quantitation. The method is limited to screening
Historically, GC/MS has played the primary role
or analyte-specific quantitation because it does not
in clinical chemistry for the diagnosis of inherited
detect all important amino acids. Special sample
metabolic disorders. However, applications of MS/MS
preparation techniques are required prior to the
in the analysis of dried filter paper blood samples for
analysis of disulfide-forming amino acids, e.g., ho-
purposes of screening inborn errors of metabolism is
mocysteine and cysteine. Chromatography is neces-
now sharing in this primary role. Clearly, MS/MS
sary to separately measure isomeric amino acids, e.g.,
applications are making an extraordinary impact in
leucine, isoleucine, alloisoleucine, and isobaric amino
increasing the number of metabolic disorders screened
acids (e.g., hydroxyproline). Recently, some develop-
in newborns.2,102,103 The MS/MS analysis of amino
ment toward rapid capillary HPLC methods with MS/
acids requires no chromatographic separation and is
MS detection has occurred as reported at the 4th
extremely rapid (∼2 min per sample). It is highly
International Society of Neonatal Screening Confer-
accurate, selective, and precise. For example, the MS/
ence.83
MS analyses of newborn blood samples for PKU has
1. GC/MS Applications been shown to significantly lower the false-positive
rate by at least 10-fold as compared to other tech-
Amino acids are often analyzed by GC/MS by using niques that use HPLC, fluorometry, and bacterial
methods similar to that for organic acids47,74 Most inhibition.83,106 MS/MS also demonstrated the ability
amino, carboxylic acid, and hydroxyl functional groups to accurately detect PKU in samples collected within
of amino acids easily form TMS derivatives.47 Analy- the first 24 h. Blood specimens collected from infants
sis of amino acids in urine has been problematic less than 24 h after birth increase the risk of a false-
because of the high concentration of urea. Large negative result because the diagnostic metabolite,
454 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
4. Thyroid Hormones
The thyroid gland produces two major hormones,
thyroxine (T4, tetraiodothyronine) and triiodothyro-
nine (T3). The chemical structures of these com-
pounds are shown in Figure 12. T3 is the most
Figure 11. MRM flow injection profiles of homocysteine biologically active of these hormones and is 5-fold
(HCY) and its internal standard (IS), D4HCY, for normal more potent than T4. The thyroid gland primarily
plasma (a), abnormal plasma (b), normal urine (c), and (d) secretes T4; peripheral deiodination of T4 accounts for
abnormal urine. Laboratory data from P. Rinaldo and M.
Magera.
nearly 80% of T3 production.128 These thyroid hor-
mones have many important actions, including regu-
lation of metabolic rate, growth, maturation, and
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)122,123 and others124
development.
produced a similar report and conclusions.
Disorders of thyroid hormone metabolism include
Newer developments have been made to improve hyper- and hypothyroidism.128 Each metabolic disor-
the analysis of homocysteine125 and related metabo- der is expressed by different clinical symptoms and
lites.126 Recent publications by Magera et al.125 and produces characteristic physiological effects. Hy-
Gempel127 used continuous flow ESI-MS/MS to ana- pothyroidism is defined as a deficiency of thyroid
lyze total homocysteine from plasma and urine activity. It is relatively common in mild or severe
samples with isotope dilution techniques. Disulfides forms and occurs predominantly in women with
were reduced with dithiothreitol. The product ion advancing age. Primary hypothyroidism occurs as a
tandem mass spectrum of underivatized homocys- result of decreased production in T3 and T4. Deficien-
teine (m/z 136) is characterized by a prominent cies of T3 and T4 cause hypersecretion of thyroid-
fragment ion at m/z 90 (neutral loss of formic acid). stimulating hormone (TSH). Congenital hypothyroid-
Other ions represent the additional loss of either ism is produced from inherited defects in the synthesis
ammonia or hydrogen sulfide and loss of formic acid, of thyroid hormones or the absence of a thyroid
resulting in product ions at m/z 73 and 56, respec- gland.37 Irreversible neurological damage will occur
tively. This CID is similar to the fragmentation of if this disorder is not detected in the newborn period.
R-amino acids shown in Figures 7 and 8, with the Detection of hypothyroidism relies upon measure-
exception that homocysteine is underivatized in this ment of high TSH levels or low thyroid hormone (T3
application.125 Data were acquired in the SRM mode and T4) concentrations in blood. Hyperthyroidism is
with the transitions (Pre/Pro) of 136/90 for homocys- characterized by elevated levels of thyroid hormones
teine (HCY) and 140/94 for d4-homocysteine (D4HCY). together with suppression of TSH concentrations in
Figure 11 shows an overlay of SRM-extracted ion blood. It is a relatively rare disorder with hyper
chromatograms of HCY and the internal standard D4- “stress” symptoms such as weight loss, fatigue,
HCY for control (A) and abnormal (B) plasma samples nervousness, and restlessness.
and control (C) and abnormal urine samples (D).125 The clinical analysis of thyroid hormones in plasma
This MS method125 demonstrated good correlation is used to diagnose thyroid diseases.38 Total T4 is the
with the other methods that are used routinely in sum of free T4 plus T4 bound to plasma proteins. The
clinical laboratories. determination of total T4 reflects thyroid hormone
458 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
1. Inherited Disorders of Fatty Acid and Organic Acid Another approach to analyze acylcarnitines by GC/
Metabolism MS is based on the preparation of volatile lactones
Inherited disorders of fatty acid oxidation are an via cyclization.146-149 Isolated acylcarnitines are trans-
important class of metabolic diseases; between 20 and formed into acyloxylactones and are analyzed by
30 disorders have been characterized.38,141 These positive CI-GC/MS, using isobutane as reactant gas.
inherited metabolic diseases can produce hypoglyce- The selected ion monitoring of a common ion at m/z
mia, vomiting, liver disease, cardiomyopathy, devel- 85 and its molecular ions enabled a selective and
opmental delay, hypotonia, seizures, coma, and pre- sensitive detection of all C2-C18 acylcarnitines.
mature sudden death.37 Symptoms can occur early Alternatively, Huang developed a novel approach
in the newborn period through adult life in varying that uses N-demethylated derivatives.150,151 This ap-
degrees of severity. Alternatively, these diseases may proach involved esterification followed by ion-pair
be asymptomatic until a life-threatening episode. extraction with potassium iodide into chloroform and
Exacerbation of the fatty acid oxidation disorders subsequent on-column N-demethylation of the result-
occurs especially during fast or inadequate caloric ing acylcarnitine propyl ester iodides. The products,
intake whereas organic acidemias are exacerbated by acyl demethylcarnitine propyl esters, are volatile and
high protein intake. Several disorders in mitochon- are amenable to CI-GC/MS analysis.
drial β-oxidation (Figure 13) have been characterized b. LC-MS and HPLC-MS. Although GC/MS offers
and include very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase the advantage of characterizing acylcarnitines by
(VLCAD) deficiency, medium-chain acyl-CoA dehy- chromatography and MS, these methods are tedious
drogenase (MCAD) deficiency, short-chain acyl-CoA and time-consuming. Because carnitine is a pre-
dehydrogenase (SCAD) deficiency, multiple acyl-CoA formed cation, it is readily detected with LC-MS as
dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD, GA-II), carnitine a positive ion with high sensitivity. Therefore, meth-
transporter defects, long- and short-chain hydroxy- ods utilizing LC-MS and LC-MS/MS have grown
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LCHAD and SCHAD, re- rapidly during the past 10 yr for several reasons that
spectively) deficiencies, carnitine-palmitoyl trans- include the following: a relatively simple sample
ferase type I and II deficiencies (CPT-I and CPT-II), preparation and analysis; multiple compound and
HMG CoA-lyase, and 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase de- chemical class analysis; and an accurate, selective,
ficiencies.37 sensitive, and rapid analysis.
Disorders of fat metabolism produce significant One of the earliest clinical applications for acyl-
elevations of free fatty acids in plasma.37 These fatty carnitine analysis was reported by Roe et al.,152,153
acids are eliminated in urine predominantly as a who used a high-resolution mass spectrometer to
conjugate with glycine (an acylglycine). Fatty acids detect propionylcarnitine in urine. This work was
in the mitochondria form acylcarnitines and are followed by research that identified several other
exported into the cell cytosol and plasma. Acylcar- acylcarnitines with similar methods.154-156 Acylcar-
nitines are eliminated in bile and urine. In metabolic nitines were analyzed underivatized or as methyl
disorders, carnitine deficiency results in many cases esters. HPLC thermospray MS was used to separate
from the continued formation of fatty acylcarnitine on-column mixtures of acylcarnitines157 and subse-
and its subsequent loss in urine and bile. Ameliora- quently used to analyze acylcarnitines in biological
tion of these deficiencies may include enhancing fluids using isotope dilution techniques.158 In another
elimination of toxic fatty acids as acylglycines or application, desorption chemical ionization was used
acylcarntines by administration of glycine and car- for the analysis of acylcarnitines.159 FAB-MS was
nitine or reducing metabolism of fatty acids by subsequently applied to the analysis of acylcar-
restoring and maintaining blood glucose at normal nitines,145,160,161 using a quadrupole MS rather than
levels. In the past decade, MS has played a critical high-resolution sector mass spectrometers. With the
role in the analysis of these important biomarkers introduction of continuous-flow FAB technology, car-
and is rapidly becoming the method of choice in nitines were soon analyzed with these techniques in
newborn and clinical screening.2,22,23 combination with HPLC.162,163 Recently, separation
2. Acylcarnitines of acylcarnitines by capillary electrophoresis com-
a. GC/MS. Carnitine is a highly water-soluble and bined with MS detection has been demonstrated.164
polar quaternary ammonium compound that com- c. LC-MS/MS. Substantial improvements in the
bines with fatty acids to form acylcarnitines of analysis of acylcarnitines and clinical diagnosis of
different carbon chain length. The high polarity inherited disorders of fatty acid metabolism occurred
makes these compounds particularly suitable for LC- with the use of a tandem quadrupole mass spectro-
MS analysis. However, early studies relied upon meter.165-169 Several organic acidemias and fatty acid
hydrolysis of the fatty acyl group followed by GC/MS oxidation defects were found in the plasma or urine
or, alternatively, upon specialized derivatization of patients with these disorders. It was recognized
techniques. Bieber first characterized acylcarnitines that detection of metabolic disorders in the newborn
in 1977 with GC/MS analysis of acyl residues follow- period, prior to clinical symptoms, could prevent
ing hydrolysis142 and later characterized short-chain hospitalization and premature death. Therefore, the
acylcarnitines.143 The therapeutic value of measuring newborn screening MS/MS applications of acylcar-
these fatty acids released from acylcarnitines was nitines extracted from dried filter paper blood samples
recognized by Roe et al.144 Kerner characterized was developed, using liquid secondary ionization
acylcarnitines in urine with GC/MS following saponi- tandem mass spectrometry (LSI-MS/MS) in manual
fication.145 introduction and dynamic modes.9,93,96 The LSI MS/
460 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
E. Bile Acids
Bile acids serve important roles in cholesterol
metabolism and digestion of lipids.201 Produced by the
liver and secreted in the intestine, bile acids solubi-
lize lipids to facilitate their absorption. Bile acids also
serve as the major mechanism for cholesterol homeo-
Figure 15. ESI-MS/MS of the butyl esters of carnitine and stasis. The major route of elimination of cholesterol
acylcarnitines from a filter paper blood spot extract of a is by excretion of bile acids into the intestine.
normal newborn and newborn with MCAD deficiency. Cholesterol elimination/conservation is regulated in
MRM transitions are shown (Pre/Pro) for free carnitine part by the extent of reabsorption of bile acids in
(CN) and its internal standard, acetyl (C2), and propionyl- enterohepatic circulation. Therefore, bile acids serve
carnitine (C3) and internal standards, and a full-scan
acylcarnitine profile (Pre 85 Da) of mass range 255-500 as a major mechanism to regulate cholesterol levels
Da. Stable isotope internal standards are underlined italic. in blood. Most disorders of bile acid metabolism are
Laboratory data from D. Chace, J. DiPerna, and E. Naylor. reflected in an abnormal liver function. There are
several metabolic disorders characterized by defective
control samples, where the mean octanoylcarnitine bile acid synthesis or diseases that produce elevated
concentration is less than 0.15 µM. Molecular meth- concentrations of bile acids, i.e., certain peroxisomal
ods were also used to support this presumptive defects.
diagnosis of MCAD by mutation analysis for the most There are two primary bile acids, cholic and cheno-
common genetic mutation, A985G.189 deoxycholic acid. These acids are conjugated with the
amino acids taurine and glycine in the liver to form
3. Acylglycines and Other Fatty Acyl Conjugates taurocholic and glycocholic acids, respectively. Figure
Another method to diagnose patients with meta- 16 provides the chemical structures of cholic acid and
bolic disorders is to measure by GC/MS glycine its taurine and glycine conjugates. Bile acids are
conjugates of diagnostic fatty acids and organic acids synthesized from cholesterol and are produced in the
in urine.169,190-197 An LC-MS method for acylglycines liver primarily as four different bile acid conjugates.
was described by Rinaldo et al.198 In addition to These acids contain polar and nonpolar groups that
462 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
1. GC/MS
Bile salts are complex biomolecules of which there
are three major classes: (i) unconjugated bile acids,
(ii) glycine- or taurine-amidated conjugates, and (iii)
sulfate, oxo, and glucuronide conjugates. GC/MS
analysis of biles acids provides unequivocal identifi-
cation through retention time and mass spectra and Figure 17. ESI-MS/MS analysis of bile acid conjugates
forms the basis for the claim that GC/MS is a extracted from a filter paper blood spot obtained from a
reference method, especially for the determination of normal neonate (top), a newborn with idiopathic neonatal
hepatitis (middle), and a newborn with extrahepatic biliary
stereochemistry.203 Setchell developed the first ap- atresia (EHBA) (bottom). MRM transitions are shown for
plications of MS to the analysis of bile acids.205-207 GC and GCC (Pro 74) and TC and TCC (Pro 80). See text
The technique uses solid-liquid/liquid gel extrac- for abbreviations. Stable isotope internal standards are
tions, ion-exchange chromatography, and bile acid underlined italic. Laboratory data from M. Morris.
analysis by capillary GC/MS. The techniques dem-
onstrate increased sensitivity as compared with other taurine conjugates produce a product ion at m/z 80.
conventional methods. Several papers demonstrate MRM analyses of bile acid conjugates and their
the applicability of clinical bile acid analysis and internal standards extracted from dried blood spots
disease detection with GC/MS.208-220 of a normal neonate, a neonate with idiopathic
neonatal hepatitis, and extrahepatic biliary atresia
2. LC-MS (EHBA) are shown in Figure 17. The method is
simple, sensitive, and accurate. However, the use of
The number and scope of LC-MS techniques for the this method in newborn screening is limited by the
analysis of bile acids has increased substantially due probability of high false-positive rates estimated at
to improvements in sensitivity, simplicity, and speed. 10%.230 Introducing a confirmatory test in addition
The earliest LC-MS methods for bile acid and bile to bile acid screening would enable the consideration
acid conjugate analyses were published by Setchell of newborn screening for bile acid disorders.
et al. using either FAB208 or thermospray221 MS.
Other applications of thermospray MS have been F. Cholesterol and Steroids
described.222,223 In addition, tandem mass spectro-
metric methods have been used to further character- Steroid hormones are synthesized from cholesterol
ize bile acids.224,225 Continuous-flow FAB-MS with in the adrenal glands and gonads. Structures of
flow injection sample introduction was developed for cholesterol and other clinically relevant steroids are
shown in Figure 18. The type and quantity of
high-throughput applications.226 More efficient ion-
individual steroids produced in plasma depends on
ization and sample analysis is achieved with spray
which gonads (testes or ovaries) are present and on
ionization techniques, i.e., ESI-MS/MS227,228 and ion
the activity of the adrenal gland.234 Steroids are
spray MS.229 These methods have been applied to the
biosynthesized by a complex group of enzymes that
diagnosis of cholestatic hepatobiliary disease230 as includes hydroxylases, lyases, isomerases, and de-
well as Smith-Lemli-Opitz (SLO) syndrome231 and hydrogenases. Catabolism of steroids occurs prima-
other disorders of bile acid metabolism.232,233 rily in the liver where the potency of steroid hor-
a. Clinical Application of Bile Acid Analysis mones is reduced by addition of hydroxyl groups,
Using ESI-MS/MS. The conjugated bile acids gly- dehydrogenation, reduction, and conjugation with
cocholic (GC), taurocholic (TC), glycochenodeoxycholic sulfuric or glucuronic acid. Most steroids are excreted
(GCC), and taurochenodeoxycholic (TCC) were ana- as water-soluble sulfate and glucuronide conjugates.
lyzed in dried filter paper blood specimens in infants Disorders of steroid biosynthesis and metabolism
with cholestatic hepatobiliary disorders with ESI-MS/ that occur in the adrenal cortex are recognized by
MS.228,230 Bile acids were eluted with methanol that depressed or excess hormone production. Adrenal
contained deuterium-labeled standards of the bile hypofunction is a result of adrenal insufficiency of
acid conjugates named above. Negative ion ESI-MS/ key steroids (Addison’s disease), whereas adrenal
MS was performed, using 50:50 acetonitrile:water as hyperfunction is characterized by the excess of pro-
the mobile phase. Glycine conjugates of bile acids duction of glucocorticoids, mineralcorticoids, and
produce an intense product ion at m/z 74, whereas androgens (Cushing’s syndrome). The genetically
MS in the Clinical Laboratory Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 463
handling. Important considerations are given to may not have adverse consequences. With the power
preventing contamination of environmental sources of µs analysis for analyzing intact hemoglobin in
of these trace elements. Two methods are most often hemoglobinapathies, the question remains: why is
used in the clinical laboratory, atomic absorption it not used routinely in the clinical laboratory? One
spectrophotometry (AA) and inductively coupled answer may be the lack of experience by clinical
plasma emission spectrometry (ICP-ES). However, chemists in performing these assays or the difficulty
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP- of integrating them in routine clinical screening.
MS) is replacing these other methods because of Second, other assays perform these analysis equally
its high specificity and accuracy. The analysis of well and at lower cost. Third, no laboratory has taken
several trace elements in biological samples has been the lead in developing an MS-based hemoglobin assay
developed.310-316 that is robust, is validated, and can be applied to
hundreds of sample analyses per day. The final
III. Diagnostic Proteins and Glycoproteins answer may be the most important. Currently, intact
hemoglobin MS methods cannot detect several im-
A. Proteome Analyses portant variant hemoglobins. Altered amino acids of
many variant hemoglobin associated with disease
The important role of MS in the identification of (HbC, HbE, and HbO) alter the mass by only 1
proteins and their correlation to the genes that Da.5,328 The resolution of mass spectrometers are not
encode them is discussed in the paper “Mass Spec- sufficiently adequate to separate the globins by mass
trometry in the Age of the Proteome” by Yates.317 and, as a result, cannot detect some hemoglobinapa-
With near completion of Human Genome Project, thies.
emphasis will shift from genomics to proteomics. MS Further advances in MS will permit more rapid
will have an important role in the characterization amino acid sequencing and more accurate, higher
of expressed proteins.6,318-320 Gene expression in- resolution analyses of intact large biomolecules.34
volves the production of mRNA that translates DNA- Ionization techniques are playing key roles in this
based information into protein synthesis.35,321 Abnor- area and include ESI and MALDI.329 New develop-
mal proteins are produced from errors in gene ments in mass analyzers (including quadrupole MS
sequences provided that these sequences are used in and MS/MS systems, ion trap MS, Fourier transform
the translation of information from DNA to RNA. In MS, and ToF-MS1) and analyzer configurations, e.g.,
addition, the “predicted” abnormal sequences may be Q-ToF, will demonstrate improved sensitivity and
altered or removed by post-translational modifica- resolution at higher masses. This section of this
tions.322 Proteins with altered amino acid composition review will emphasize MS analyses of hemoglobin
may or may not have clinical consequence, depending and glycohemoglobin as an example of protein analy-
on which amino acids are altered, whether these sis via MS in the clinical laboratory.
altered amino acids change substrate specificity, or
other changes that affect protein activity, specificity, B. Hemoglobin
or function.
MS is important in protein identification and HbA comprises 96% of normal adult hemoglobin
characterization.34,318,319,323-326 In clinical research, whereas hemoglobin A2 (HbA2) accounts for 3%. HbA2
mass information and structure elucidation is often is composed of two R and two β chains. During fetal
used to understand the function of a protein and can development, the dominant hemoglobin is fetal he-
be used to correlate the protein composition with a moglobin (hemoglobin F, HbF). Fetal hemoglobin is
gene sequence. It is likely that, on completion of the composed of two R and two γ globin chains. After
human genome project, research dollars will be birth, the amount of HbF diminishes to levels of less
redirected to the investigation and characterization than 1% in adults.330
of proteins coded by human genes. MS will play a Thalassemias are inherited disorders characterized
dominant role in this area, especially with regard to by decreased synthesis of either R or β globin chains.
post-translational modifications.327 As proteins are R-Thalassemias are the most common genetic abnor-
identified as important biomarkers of disease, the use malities of hemoglobin in humans. Symptoms of R-
of MS to screen proteins that are diagnostic for these and β-thalasemias are categorized as minor to severe
disorders will increase. The MS analysis of hemoglo- with the latter including lethal anemia, growth
bin328 is an example of the potential role of protein retardation, and bone malformation. In contrast,
analyses in a clinical screen. hemoglobinopathies are disorders characterized by
Normal adult hemoglobin (hemoglobin A, HbA) is structural alternations in either one or more globin
a tetrameric protein that is composed of two sets of chains. Over 700 structural variants of hemoglobin
polypeptide chains, two R and two β chains. Hemo- have been found, with the majority having no clinical
globin exists in various forms that are characterized or hematological manifestations.328 Some hemoglo-
by the composition of the globin chains. Some hemo- binopathies, however, have significant clinical se-
globin variants exists normally and, in fact, are quellae. Hemoglobin S (HbS) is a form of hemoglobin
predominant at defined stages of development, i.e., that forms long rope-like polymers with other HbS
hemoglobin F is the dominant hemoglobin in the molecules. These hemoglobins aggregate and distort
fetus. Other variants of the globin chain produce the shape of red blood cells to form a characteristic
serious disease, i.e., hemoglobin S is the dominant “sickle” shape. Clinical symptoms of sickle cell ane-
hemoglobin in sickle cell disease. MS has played a mia include joint pain and organ damage in patients
role in identifying many more variants that may or that are homozygous for this disease.330 Heterozy-
466 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
Figure 23. MALDI-ToF mass spectra directly acquired from cells that are laser capture microdissected from a single
patient’s frozen tissue: normal breast epithelium (top), invasive ductal carcinoma of breast (middle), and metastatic ductal
carcinoma (bottom). The low mass region (5000-10 000 m/z) is shown at a lower magnification than the high mass region
(20 000-60 000 m/z). Note the features at 6100-6900, 7700-7900, and 45 000-58 000 that distinguish the normal cell
profiles from those of the carcinomas. Laboratory data from D. E. Palmer-Toy.
MS in the Clinical Laboratory Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 469
RNA is a much shorter single-stranded polymer. practical mass range for analysis of oligonucleotides
Short segments of DNA are called oligonucleotides; is based on the ability of the mass spectrometer to
with the average size of these polymers (oligomer) resolve an A to T transversion (change of A to T).
ranging between 15 and 45 bases. A common term The mass difference of A and T is 9 Da. A resolving
that is often used to denote the number of bases in power of 1 in 1000 is necessary to distinguish these
an oligonucleotide is the suffix “mer”. The number two bases. The analyses therefore has a practical,
of bases followed by mer in addition to the abbrevia- working mass range of 9000 Da or less.
tions ss and ds for single- and double-stranded DNA Advances in the next few years will include the use
is used. Therefore a 15-base double-stranded DNA of chip technology (micro-arrays),396 especially in the
is denoted 15-mer ds-DNA and is composed of deoxy- area of clinical screening. A DNA chip is a small
A, G, C, and T. device that holds a regular array of DNA molecules
The role of MS in DNA-based analysis and screen- that are chemically attached to the surface. These
ing is currently being defined.389-394 Potential routine DNA molecules generally contain known probe se-
applications of MS include detection of DNA modi- quences that will hybridize with their target comple-
fications or mutations and their sequencing. Re- mentary sequences. These arrays are analyzed by a
cently, the use of MS to analyze short DNA fragments variety of techniques, including MS.395,397 Chip tech-
for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)395 has led nology is amenable to automated sample analyses
to major advances in the automated analysis of DNA and high-throughput screening. MS may be advanta-
via MS. The mass range of mass spectrometric geous in analyzing multiple DNA probes on a single
analysis of oligonucleotides increases each year in chip because of its high selectivity and specificity.
part due to advances in MS technology and also due Multi-probe analyses is as important for screening
to methods for analysis and sample preparation. known genetic mutations in a single analysis in a
Mass resolution and the instability of long DNA similar manner that MS/MS has been used to screen
polymers that are easily fragmented limit the size of for multiple metabolites.
the oligonucleotide that can be analyzed. Most MS articles related to DNA analysis have
New methods in DNA array technology396 are been in the areas of biomedical and clinical research,
rapidly expanding mutation analysis capabilities for whereas the use of DNA analysis with MS detection
genetic diseases by inclusion of multiple genetic in the clinical lab is quite rare. During this decade,
probes for a disease and as a consequence reducing it is likely that screening for single nucleotide poly-
the false-negative rate.397 However, these methods morphisms for risk assessment of cancer and heart
will identify many carriers of disease (unaffected disease will be more commonplace.400 As molecular
heterozygotes). The implications of this technology methods enter routine screening, so will high-
require discussion before implementation. Questions throughput MS applications.
such as “Will carriers (heterozygotes) be reported?”
must be answered. The major contribution that MS B. Current MS Applications
will have in the DNA diagnostics area may be its Clearly, MS is an ideal tool for the analysis of
capacity to analyze multiple genetic probes or gene modified or unusual nucleic acids, nucleosides, or
fragments in a single test. Further into the future, nucleotides. Electrospray ionization is especially
improvements in MS may enable direct analysis of suited for the analysis of these DNA components.
gene fragments without the need for amplification Several methods for the measurement of nucleic
or excessive sample preparation. The question that acids401-404 have been published, especially in the
must be answered is whether a genetic mutation in area of urinalysis of tumor markers.5,405-407 With
question correlates with a disease and if so then how. regard to oligonucleotide analyses, the analysis of
Most likely, MS applications will be primarily focused these small DNA fragments are highly indicative of
on the gene expression. In the near term, the use of mutations that cause disease. New assays have been
DNA as the primary tool for diagnosing disease states developed for clinical disorders,408 including Tay-
will largely depend on the availability and accuracy Sachs disease,409 cardiovascular disorders,410,411 cystic
of other methods that analyze proteins or metabo- fibrosis,391,412 cancer,413 and pathogens.400 There are
lites. For diseases that are characterized by few several other genomic applications of MS in clinical
mutations and that cannot be screened by conven- research that are more appropriately and compre-
tional methods, DNA-based assays will provide a hensively presented in other reviews.414
solution. DNA-based analysis will clearly be used as
a confirmation method as well as prenatal diagnosis
and genetic counseling. More importantly, DNA V. Quantitative Analysis and Quality Assurance
analysis will play a critical role in risk assessment
of disorders such as cancer, neurological disorders, A. Quantification in Clinical Chemistry
and heart disease. The importance of quantification in clinical chem-
Advances in MALDI -ToF analysis has been the istry was described by Yergey at the 11th Sanibel
major contributor to the growth of MS applications Conference on Mass Spectrometry.4 At this confer-
in genomics.398,399 Most MALDI-ToF applications ence, clinical analyses were described as either
have been used to analyze DNA, including fragments qualitative or quantitative. Results from qualitative
as small as a 15-mer for a short oligonucleotide assays are characterized either as positive and nega-
sequence (∼1500 Da) to greater than a 500-mer tive or as black and white. Quantitative analyses are
(>100 000 Da) in most recent studies. Currently, the characterized by results that measure the degree of
470 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
a response such as the intensity of light emission, In clinical chemistry, the quantitative limits for
height of a peak plotted on a graph, or the number analytical accuracy must be also be defined.425 Con-
of events (i.e., counts in a defined period).54 A fidence in an analytical result is highest if the result
”semiquantitative” analysis is a category used com- is within the upper and lower range of standards.426
monly to define an assay that measures a response Methods that use ratios of ratios (a ratio of an analyte
but is not a highly precise term.415 to its internal standard versus ratio of reference
Assays often characterized as “qualitative” are material to its internal standard) provide the best
some drugs of abuse or metabolite screening tests statistics. The standard error of the estimates should
that are based on immunoassays or other assay that be used in linearity assessments rather than correla-
are based on biological responses such as bacterial tion coefficients. Data that have nonlinear responses
inhibition assays.23 In these assays, a positive or should not be used; rather, alternative assays should
negative result is most often reported. However, be developed.
these assays still have some basis in accurate quan-
tification, i.e., the concentration of the analyte above B. Quality Assurance
or below the cutoff but sufficiently accurate in order The other major requirement of clinical analyses
for the test to be useful. What may be less stringent is quality assurance.427 Quality assurance distin-
in qualitative assays is the linearity of the concentra- guishes methods used in clinical diagnostics from
tions over a large range of concentrations. It is clear clinical research.54,428 Quality assurance ensures that
that there is some difficulty in distinguishing a the result obtained in an analysis is reliable and
qualitative, semiquantitative, and quantitative assay. accurate. Furthermore, it must detect methodological
A more clear example for qualitative analysis is the errors and other problems that may occur at any
application of MS in hemoglobin analyses. The pres- point between the handling of a specimen and
ence or absence of one or two sickle globin chains reporting of a result. For example, errors can occur
(HbS) is indicative of a carrier or sickle cell disease. during specimen collection, delivery, storage, sample
Quantitative analyses are used to determine the preparation, sample analysis, data reduction, result
concentration of substrates in biological fluids (i.e., interpretation, communication of results to physi-
glucose, phenylalanine, homocysteine) in blood, urine, cians, and follow up. Quality assurance is necessary
CSF, or tissues.25 Quantitative data are generated because undetected errors can result in a false result
by a measurement of a response.416 The reliability of that may harm a patient. The medicolegal implica-
this response is based on statistical confidence pa- tions or a laboratory error can be serious.
rameters such as precision. Semiquantitative analy-
Examples of quality assurance systems developed
ses are actually quantitative assays that do not have
for mass spectrometric assays have been described
sufficient statistical power to generate high confi-
for applications that involve newborn screen-
dence in the precision of the result because of
ing.107,108,273,429 It is noteworthy that, to ensure imple-
analytical limitations. This technique is most used
mentation of a quality assurance program in a
in rapid metabolite screening or therapeutic drug
laboratory that performs clinical analysis, the labora-
monitoring, where the desired results do not need to
tory must meet Federal laboratory accreditation
be highly precise but rather to answer the question
requirements as defined by CLIA (Clinical and
of whether a metabolite falls within a certain range.
Laboratory Improvement Act) of 1988. Research
Standardization is required for all quantitative assays must be clearly delineated from routine clini-
assays. Concentration measurements are based on cal assays and cannot be used to report patient
the relationship of a measured response of a com- results. Several investigators have addressed quality
pound relative to the response of a standard or assurance and the use of mass spectrometric based
reference. This relationship of unknown to standard, assays by developing standards, reference materials,
often expressed as an intensity ratio, is compared to isotope dilution techniques, laboratory comparisons,
the relationship of a known amount of analyte to the and external assessments.107,108,273,427,429-434
standard. The plot of concentration of known analytes Two important applications of MS are (i) its use
versus standard is defined as the standard curve. as a confirmatory test for other assays or (ii) its use
Results from an unknown are obtained by interpola- as part of a quality assurance methods examining
tion from this standard curve. the production and quality of reagents or comparison
Standards are either external or internal. External of results from non-MS-based assays such as immu-
standards417 are measured separately and are used noassays and molecular assays. MS methods devel-
to calibrate the signal of an instrument relative to oped for these applications are critically important
known concentrations. Internal standards417 are because its serves as a means for identification,
present in the same matrix as the unknown and are characterization, and confirmation of analytes or
co-analyzed. Internal standards are typically materials that are used or found in less specific
homologues or analogues of the analyte being assays.
assayed. Standards that differ only by their
isotopic content are the most ideal standards for VI. Conclusions
use in MS applications because they differ only
by their isotopic content rather than chemical prop- As new technology is developed by MS manufac-
erties in most instances. MS applications that use turers working in conjunction with private industry
stable isotopes in quantitation are defined as IDMS and academic institutions, opportunities for innova-
techniques.135,295,415,416,418-424 tive research become available. The development of
MS in the Clinical Laboratory Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 471
novel methods enables the discovery of new of a disease. Other important issues in harmonization
biochemical and physiological processes. With a bet- and quality assurance include clinical interpretation,
ter understanding of these processes, knowledge and result reporting, physician education, and clinical
insight into the basis and mechanism of disease arise. and genetic follow up; those areas where mass
New biomarkers for disease are soon discovered, and spectrometrists are generally not experts. These are
methods are subsequently developed to measure issues that will require attention as MS expands the
these compounds in blood, plasma, or urine. The clinical lab.
methods used in the discovery of disease processes
are the methods that are adapted to their laboratory A. Outlook of Clinical MS
diagnosis. It is clear therefore that advancements in
technology directly impact clinical analysis, albeit It is clear that MS has served an important role in
delayed. Delays in method implementation are a the clinical laboratory, especially in areas of metabo-
result of stringent method validation that includes lome analyses. However, most of these analyses are
still being performed in specialized reference labo-
statistical assessments, method comparisons, pilot
ratories rather than hospital-based clinical labora-
screening studies, and QA/QC implementation. Fur-
tories. This trend is likely to continue in part because
thermore, new methods must be integrated into
MS and the associated specimen preparation and
laboratory protocols and information systems. Ad-
result interpretation requires a high degree expertise
vances made during the past decade are just now
not found routinely among clinical chemists. Never-
being applied to laboratory diagnostic medicine.
theless, there are efforts to automate and enable
These new applications are evidenced by the adapta-
turn-key mass spectrometric bases systems that do
tion and integration of MS/MS methodology used in
not require the extensive experience in MS. The
newborn screening.2 Developed nearly 10 years ago
success of turn-key systems in MS as total solutions
and originally applied to a few dozen plasma samples to a clinical analysis will be more apparent in this
per day, metabolic profiling using MS/MS for the decade.
analysis of dried blood samples is just now being
The heart of the mass spectrometer is the mass
implemented. Over 1 000 000 infants/year will be
analyzer, whether that analyzer is a quadrupole, ion
screened worldwide with MS/MS in 2000, and this
trap, or ToF. This past decade has shown that
growth is expected to continue.2
electrospray and MALDI are rugged, reproducible,
In addition to the benefits of MS in the clinical lab, efficient, and versatile ionization systems. The dra-
there are some limitations. First, mass spectrometric matic changes in mass spectrometer analyzer and
methods are generally not turn-key. Nevertheless, source configurations that occurred in the previous
progress will be made in this area as the demands two decades will shift to equally important develop-
for MS-based solutions increase. Second, there is ments in specimen handling, sample preparation,
limited availability of scientists that have expertise analyte isolation and purification, high-throughput
in laboratory medicine and in analytical chemistry/ automation, data processing, library searching, and
MS. Third, the number of users and methods will computer-assisted interpretation. Methods will be
increase as MS technology becomes more accessible. available to analyze a whole host of metabolites. The
With the development of slightly different variations question remains as to whether these developments
of a particular test used by different laboratories, will make mass spectrometric methods cost-effective
there is a greater likelihood of different results. The and as inexpensive as immunoassays, which are most
chance increases for a miscommunication or misdi- often applied in the “one disease/one analyte” clinical
agnosis between health care provider and laboratory. assay. Clearly, mass spectrometric methods, that
Required harmonization of MS methods will ensure include multiple analytes as observed in the area of
that if a physician orders test A, then the results will newborn screening of amino acids and acylcarnitines,
always include the concentration of compounds X, Y, will continue to grow and become a more common
and Z. Harmonization begins with the development clinical tool.
of an independent quality assessment program.107,108 We are now embarking on the age of proteomics.
Does harmonization mean that a single MS instru- With the Human Genome initiative essentially com-
ment or system be used to perform a particular plete, the next major endeavor will be research in
assay? The answer is no. Mass spectrometric methods gene expression. Clearly, specialty analyses will be
allow many variations of sample preparation and developed to identify specific proteins that are mark-
analyses and yet produce comparable end points, i.e., ers of disease. An example is hemoglobin and sickle
the concentration of phenylalanine in blood. In fact, cell disorders. Will MS replace robust, well-estab-
recent work in newborn screening has indicated that lished techniques such as isoelectric focusing or
acylcarnitines may be analyzed either as a butyl ester HPLC? Improvements in resolution, mass accuracy,
or directly without esterification The advantages of and sensitivity will be required if MS is to become
the removal of the esterification step in the procedure competitive on a routine basis for such assays.
is simplification and sample preparation time. The However, new approaches to identification of cellular
disadvantages may be loss of poorly ionizable me- profiles through protein fingerprinting may rapidly
tabolites, unexpected interferences, and inability to enter the clinical diagnostic field due to simplicity
co-analyze some amino acids. Therefore, MS allows and potential cost-effectiveness. Methods that can
creativity in method applications while still achieving qualitatively identify microorganisms or characterize
the same end points, e.g., obtaining the accurate tumorogenic tissue or other diseased tissues may
quantification of a metabolite that is used to diagnose become routine if methodology for specimen prepara-
472 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
tion is standardized. The key to the success of these (7) Sparkman, O. D. Mass Spectrometry Desk Reference, 1st ed.;
Global View Publishing: Pittsburgh, 2000.
methods will be quality assurance and control pro- (8) Niwa, T. Clin. Chim. Acta 1995, 241-242, 3-12.
grams, which has not been addressed at this time. (9) Matsuo, T. Biological Mass Spectrometry: Present and Future;
QA/QC is the “gate- keeper” between research meth- Wiley: Chichester and New York, 1994.
(10) Neufeldt, V.; Guralnik, D. B. Webster’s New World College
ods and clinical methods. Dictionary, 3rd ed.; Macmillan: New York, 1997.
With regard to genomics, MS applications will (11) Bermes, E.; Young, D. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry,
3rd ed.; Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B.
likely be applied to the investigation of single nucle- Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999.
otide polymorphisms (SNP) and the correlation with (12) Lawson, A. M. Clin. Chem. 1975, 21, 803-24.
disease risk assessment. As treatment strategies for (13) Gerhards, P. GC/MS in Clinical Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Wein-
heim and New York, 1999.
many genetic disorders become available, SNP analy- (14) Wolthers, B. G.; Kraan, G. P. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 843, 247-
ses using MS will become part of screening programs 74.
for risk assessment of disabling diseases. Clearly, the (15) Jellum, E.; Kvittingen, E. A.; Thoresen, O.; Guldal, G.; Horn,
L.; Seip, R.; Stokke, O. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 1986,
use of MS in providing analytical solutions for clinical 184, 11-20.
laboratory problems will continue to grow. (16) Niwa, T. J. Chromatogr. 1986, 379, 313-45.
(17) Gelpi, E. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 703, 59-80.
Finally, MS will provide the most accurate and (18) Niwa, T. Clin. Chim. Acta 1995, 241-242, 293-384.
precise results in this decade and will continue to (19) Chalmers, R. A.; Lawson, A. M. Organic Acids in Man: Analytical
improve access to cost-effective solutions and com- Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Diagnosis of the Organic Aci-
durias; Chapman and Hall: London and New York, 1982.
prehensive analyses of complex mixtures by rapid (20) Bremer, H. J. Disturbances of Amino Acid Metabolism: Clinical
high-throughput analyses. In addition to its increas- Chemistry and Diagnosis; Urban & Schwarzenberg: Baltimore,
ing roles as a primary clinical test or a screen of many 1981.
(21) Hommes, F. A. Techniques in Diagnostic Human Biochemical
diseases, MS will provide confirmation of results Genetics: A Laboratory Manual; Wiley-Liss: New York, 1991.
obtained from other assays. It is clear that the future (22) Sweetman, L. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42, 345-6.
(23) Levy, H. L. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44, 2401-2.
of MS will be its complete integration into the clinical (24) Chace, D. H.; Millington, D. S.; Terada, N.; Kahler, S. G.; Roe,
laboratory. Data systems will integrate all laboratory C. R.; Hofman, L. F. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39, 66-71.
data, including MS results. These data will provide (25) Bjorkhem, I.; Blomstrand, R.; Eriksson, S.; Falk, O.; Kallner,
A.; Svensson, L.; Ohman, G. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1980,
the most comprehensive information used for the 40, 529-34.
diagnose of common and rare diseases, with a very (26) Bjorkhem, I.; Blomstrand, R.; Lantto, O.; Svensson, L.; Ohman,
low number of false-positive and false-negative re- G. Clin. Chem. 1976, 22, 1789-801.
(27) Anderson, D. J.; Guo, B.; Xu, Y.; Ng, L. M.; Kricka, L. J.;
sults. The future of MS in the clinical laboratory is Skogerboe, K. J.; Hage, D. S.; Schoeff, L.; Wang, J.; Sokoll, L.
promising and is unquestionably exciting. J.; Chan, D. W.; Ward, K. M.; Davis, K. A. Anal. Chem. 1997,
69, 165R- 229R.
(28) Prence, E. M. Genet. Test. 1999, 3, 201-5.
VII. Acknowledgments (29) Bowers, G. N., Jr.; Fassett, J. D.; White, E. Anal. Chem. 1993,
65, 475R-9R.
The preparation of and literature research for this (30) Marquet, P.; Lachatre, G. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 733, 93-118.
(31) Maurer, H. H. J. Chromatogr. B 1998, 713, 3-25.
manuscript has been graciously funded and sup- (32) Hill, R. E.; Whelan, D. T. Clin. Chim. Acta 1984, 139, 231-94.
ported by Neo Gen Screening, Inc. The author grate- (33) Lawson, A. M. Mass Spectrometry; de Gruyter: Berlin and New
fully acknowledges the considerable assistance of York, 1989.
(34) Desiderio, D. M. Mass Spectrometry of Peptides; CRC Press:
Theodore A. Kalas (Neo Gen Screening) in the Boca Raton, FL, 1991.
literature retrieval and document searching. Dr. (35) Hochstrasser, D. F. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 1998, 36, 825-36.
(36) http://www.asms.org.
Michael Morris (Micromass, LTD), Dr. Piero Rinaldo (37) Scriver, C. R. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited
(Mayo Clinic), Dr. David Hercules (Vanderbilt Uni- Disease, 7th ed.; McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division: New
versity), Dr. Darryl Palmer-Toy (Johns Hopkins York, 1995.
(38) Blau, N.; Duran, M.; Blaskovics, M. E. Physician’s Guide to the
School of Medicine), Dr. Peter Leopold (ProteiGene Laboratory Diagnosis of Metabolic Diseases, 1st ed.; Chapman
Inc.), Dr. Elizabeth Prence (Neo Gen Screening), and & Hall: London, 1996.
Dr. Larry Sweetman (Baylor University) are grate- (39) Goodman, S. I.; Markey, S. P. Lab. Res. Methods Biol. Med. 1981,
6, 1-158.
fully acknowledged for their contributions of original (40) Meier-Augenstein, W.; Hoffmann, G. F.; Holmes, B.; Jones, J.
data. Critical review, comments, and other contribu- L.; Nyhan, W. L.; Sweetman, L. J. Chromatogr. 1993, 615, 127-
35.
tions by Dr. Elizabeth Prence, John Sorrentino, Dr. (41) Hoffmann, G.; Aramaki, S.; Blum-Hoffmann, E.; Nyhan, W. L.;
Edwin Naylor, and James DiPerna of Neo Gen Sweetman, L. Clin. Chem. 1989, 35, 587-95.
Screening are appreciated and acknowledged. Fi- (42) Sweetman, L.; Hoffmann, G.; Aramaki, S. Enzyme 1987, 38,
124-31.
nally, the author expresses sincere appreciation to (43) Forman, D. T. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1991, 21, 85-93.
his family and colleagues for their ideas, support, and (44) Halket, J. M.; Przyborowska, A.; Stein, S. E.; Mallard, W. G.;
encouragement during the preparation of this manu- Down, S.; Chalmers, R. A. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
1999, 13, 279-84.
script. (45) Kimura, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamaguchi, S. Tohoku J. Exp. Med.
1999, 188, 317-34.
(46) Kimura, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamaguchi, S. Ann. Clin. Biochem.
VIII. References 1999, 36, 671-2.
(47) Shoemaker, J. D.; Elliott, W. H. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 562, 125-
(1) Willoughby, R.; Sheehan, E.; Mitrovich, S. A Global View of LC/ 38.
MS. How To Solve Your Most Challenging Analytical Problems, (48) Eghbaldar, A.; Forrest, T. P.; Cabrol-Bass, D.; Cambon, A.;
1st ed.; Global View Publishing: Pittsburgh, 1998. Guigonis, J. M. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 637-43.
(2) Chace, D. H.; DiPerna, J. C.; Naylor, E. W. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. (49) Lehotay, D. C. Biomed. Chromatogr. 1991, 5, 113-21.
1999, 88, 45-7. (50) Husek, P. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 1999-2001.
(3) Siuzdak, G. Mass Spectrometry for Biotechnology; Academic (51) Suh, J. W.; Lee, S. H.; Chung, B. C. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 2256-
Press: San Diego, 1996. 61.
(4) Sparkman, O. D. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 10, 561-4. (52) McCann, M. T.; Thompson, M. M.; Gueron, I. C.; Lemieux, B.;
(5) Desiderio, D. M. Mass Spectrometry: Clinical and Biomedical Giguere, R.; Tuchman, M. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42, 910-4.
Applications; Plenum Press: New York, 1992. (53) Bengtsson, I. M.; Lehotay, D. C. J. Chromatogr. B 1996, 685,
(6) Yates, J. R., III. Trends Genet. 2000, 16, 5-8. 1-7.
MS in the Clinical Laboratory Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 473
(54) Burtis, C. A.; Ashwood, E. R.; Tietz, N. W. Tietz Textbook of (100) Rashed, M. S.; Rahbeeni, Z.; Ozand, P. T. Semin. Perinatol. 1999,
Clinical Chemistry, 3rd ed.; W. B. Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999. 23, 183-93.
(55) Siekmann, L. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 1985, 23, 137-44. (101) Johnson, A. W.; Mills, K.; Clayton, P. T. Biochem. Soc. Trans.
(56) Liebich, H. M.; Gesele, E. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 843, 237-45. 1996, 24, 932-8.
(57) Hoffmann, G. F.; Sweetman, L. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spec- (102) Chace, D.; Naylor, E. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabilities Res. Rev.
trom. 1990, 19, 517-9. 1999, 5, 150-4.
(58) Hoffmann, G. F.; Sweetman, L. Clin. Chim. Acta 1991, 199, 237- (103) Naylor, E. W.; Chace, D. H. J. Child Neurol. 1999, 14 (Suppl.
42. 1), S4-8.
(59) Husek, P.; Matucha, P. J. Chromatogr. B 1997, 693, 499-502. (104) Shigematsu, Y.; Hata, I.; Kikawa, Y.; Mayumi, M.; Tanaka, Y.;
(60) Hagen, T.; Korson, M. S.; Sakamoto, M.; Evans, J. E. Clin. Chim. Sudo, M.; Kado, N. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 731, 97-103.
Acta 1999, 283, 77-88. (105) Seashore, M. R. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 1998, 10, 609-14.
(61) Nyhan, W. L.; Shelton, G. D.; Jakobs, C.; Holmes, B.; Bowe, C.; (106) Chace, D. H.; Sherwin, J. E.; Hillman, S. L.; Lorey, F.; Cun-
Curry, C. J.; Vance, C.; Duran, M.; Sweetman, L. J. Child ningham, G. C. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44, 2405-9.
Neurol. 1995, 10, 137-42. (107) Chace, D. H.; Adam, B. W.; Smith, S. J.; Alexander, J. R.;
(62) Jakobs, C.; Sweetman, L.; Nyhan, W. L. Clin. Chim. Acta 1984, Hillman, S. L.; Hannon, W. H. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 1269-77.
140, 157-66. (108) Adam, B. W.; Alexander, J. R.; Smith, S. J.; Chace, D. H.; Loeber,
(63) Jakobs, C.; Sweetman, L.; Nyhan, W. L. Prenatal Diagn. 1984, J. G.; Elvers, L. H.; Hannon, W. H. Clin. Chem. 2000, 46, 126-
4, 187-94. 8.
(64) Naylor, G.; Sweetman, L.; Nyhan, W. L.; Hornbeck, C.; Griffiths, (109) Hannon, W. H.; Boyle, J.; Davin, B.; Marsden, A.; McCabe, E.
J.; Morch, L.; Brandange, S. Clin. Chim. Acta 1980, 107, 175- R. B.; Schwartz, M. NCCLS Document LA4-A3; 1997.
83. (110) Tuchman, M.; McCann, M. T. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 571-3.
(65) Duez, P.; Kumps, A.; Mardens, Y. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42, 1609- (111) Chaimbault, P.; Petritis, K.; Elfakir, C.; Dreux, M. J. Chro-
15. matogr. A 1999, 855, 191-202.
(66) Brooks, K. E.; Smith, N. B. Clin. Chem. 1991, 37, 1975-8. (112) Oehlke, J.; Brudel, M.; Blasig, I. E. J. Chromatogr. B 1994, 655,
(67) Husek, P.; Liebich, H. M. J. Chromatogr. B 1994, 656, 37-43. 105-11.
(68) Costa, C. G.; Dorland, L.; Holwerda, U.; de Almeida, I. T.; Poll- (113) MacCoss, M. J.; Fukagawa, N. K.; Matthews, D. E. Anal. Chem.
The, B. T.; Jakobs, C.; Duran, M. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44, 463- 1999, 71, 4527-33.
71. (114) Sass, J. O.; Endres, W. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 776, 342-7.
(69) Verhoeven, N. M.; Kulik, W.; van den Heuvel, C. M.; Jakobs, C. (115) Ducros, V.; Schmitt, D.; Pernod, G.; Faure, H.; Polack, B.; Favier,
J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1995, 18, 45-60. A. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 729, 333-9.
(70) Molzer, B.; Korschinsky, M.; Bernheimer, H.; Schmid, R.; Wolf, (116) Pietzsch, J.; Julius, U.; Hanefeld, M. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43,
C.; Roscher, A. Clin. Chim. Acta 1986, 161, 81-90. 2001-4.
(71) Jones, P. M.; Quinn, R.; Fennessey, P. V.; Tjoa, S.; Goodman, S. (117) Savage, D. G.; Lindenbaum, J.; Stabler, S. P.; Allen, R. H. Am.
I.; Fiore, S.; Burlina, A. B.; Rinaldo, P.; Boriack, R. L.; Bennett, J. Med. 1994, 96, 239-46.
M. J. Clin. Chem. 2000, 46, 149-55. (118) Stabler, S. P.; Marcell, P. D.; Podell, E. R.; Allen, R. H. Anal.
(72) Ozand, P. T.; Gascon, G. G. J. Child Neurol. 1991, 6, 196-219. Biochem. 1987, 162, 185-96.
(73) Ozand, P. T.; Gascon, G. G. J. Child Neurol. 1991, 6, 288-303. (119) Stabler, S. P.; Marcell, P. D.; Podell, E. R.; Allen, R. H.; Savage,
(74) Kuhara, T.; Shinka, T.; Inoue, Y.; Ohse, M.; Zhen-wei, X.; D. G.; Lindenbaum, J. J. Clin. Invest. 1988, 81, 466-74.
Yoshida, I.; Inokuchi, T.; Yamaguchi, S.; Takayanagi, M.; (120) Myung, S. W.; Kim, M.; Min, H. K.; Yoo, E. A.; Kim, K. R. J.
Matsumoto, I. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 731, 141-7. Chromatogr. B 1999, 727, 1-8.
(75) Norman, E. J. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993, 46, 382. (121) Ubbink, J. B.; Delport, R.; Riezler, R.; Vermaak, W. J. Clin.
(76) Niwa, T. Clin. Chim. Acta 1995, 241-242, 191-220. Chem. 1999, 45, 670-5.
(77) Yang, Y. J.; Lee, S. H.; Hong, S. J.; Chung, B. C. Clin. Biochem. (122) J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999, 282, 2112-3.
1999, 32, 405-9. (123) MMWR Morb. Mortal Weekly Rep. 1999, 48, 1013-5.
(78) Buchanan, D. N.; Muenzer, J.; Thoene, J. G. J. Chromatogr. (124) Moller, J.; Rasmussen, K.; Christensen, L. Clin. Chem. 1999,
1990, 534, 1-11. 45, 1536-42.
(79) Mills, G. A.; Walker, V.; Clench, M. R.; Parr, V. C. Biomed. (125) Magera, M. J.; Lacey, J. M.; Casetta, B.; Rinaldo, P. Clin. Chem.
Environ. Mass Spectrom. 1988, 16, 259-61. 1999, 45, 1517-22.
(80) Johnson, D. W. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13, 2388- (126) Celma, C.; Allue, J. A.; Prunonosa, J.; Peraire, C.; Obach, R. J.
93. Chromatogr. A 2000, 870, 13-22.
(81) Johnson, D. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2000, 23, 475-86. (127) Gempel, K.; Gerbitz, K. D.; Casetta, B.; Bauer, M. F. Clin. Chem.
(82) Christenson, R.; Azzazy, H. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical 2000, 46, 122-3.
Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., (128) Whitley, R. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, 3rd ed.;
Eds.; W. B. Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999. Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B.
(83) Simonsen, H.; Jensen, U. G. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 1999, 88, 52- Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999.
4. (129) Ramsden, D. B.; Farmer, M.; Mohammed, M. N.; Willetts, P.
(84) Husek, P. J. Chromatogr. B 1995, 669, 352-7. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1984, 11, 193-8.
(85) Mawhinney, T. P.; Robinett, R. S.; Atalay, A.; Madson, M. A. J. (130) Ramsden, D. B.; Farmer, M. J. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1984,
Chromatogr. 1986, 358, 231-42. 11, 421-7.
(86) Wang, J.; Huang, Z. H.; Gage, D. A.; Watson, J. T. J. Chromatogr (131) Thienpont, L. M.; De Brabandere, V. I.; Stockl, D.; De Leenheer,
A 1994, 663, 71-8. A. P. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 23, 475-82.
(87) Patterson, B. W.; Carraro, F.; Wolfe, R. R. Biol. Mass Spectrom. (132) Thienpont, L. M.; Van Nieuwenhove, B.; Stockl, D.; Reinauer,
1993, 22, 518-23. H.; De Leenheer, A. P. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 1996,
(88) Calder, A. G.; Garden, K. E.; Anderson, S. E.; Lobley, G. E. Rapid 34, 853-60.
Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13, 2080-3. (133) Siekmann, L. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 1987, 14, 683-
(89) Pietzsch, J.; Julius, U.; Hanefeld, M. Rapid Commun. Mass 8.
Spectrom. 1997, 11, 1835-8. (134) Moller, B.; Bjorkhem, I.; Falk, O.; Lantto, O.; Larsson, A. J. Clin.
(90) Burrows, E. P. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 221-8. Endocrinol. Metab. 1983, 56, 30-4.
(91) Simpson, J. T.; Torok, D. S.; Girard, J. E.; Markey, S. P. Anal. (135) Moller, B.; Falk, O.; Bjorkhem, I. Clin. Chem. 1983, 29, 2106-
Biochem. 1996, 233, 58-66. 10.
(92) Jellum, E.; Horn, L.; Thoresen, O.; Kvittingen, E. A.; Stokke, O. (136) Lawson, A. M.; Ramsden, D. B.; Raw, P. J.; Hoffenberg, R.
Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 1986, 184, 21-6. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1974, 1, 374-80.
(93) Millington, D.; Kodo, N.; Terada, N.; Roe, D.; Chace, D. Int. J. (137) Heki, N. Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi 1978, 54, 1157-62.
Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 1991, 111, 211-28. (138) De Brabandere, V. I.; Hou, P.; Stockl, D.; Thienpont, L. M.; De
(94) Chace, D. H.; Hillman, S. L.; Millington, D. S.; Kahler, S. G.; Leenheer, A. P. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12,
Adam, B. W.; Levy, H. L. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42, 349-55. 1099-103.
(95) Chace, D. H.; Hillman, S. L.; Millington, D. S.; Kahler, S. G.; (139) Crossley, D. N.; Ramsden, D. B. Clin. Chim. Acta 1979, 94, 267-
Roe, C. R.; Naylor, E. W. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 62-8. 72.
(96) Chace, D.; Millington, D. In New Horizons in Neonatal Screening, (140) Thienpont, L. M.; Fierens, C.; De Leenheer, A. P.; Przywara, L.
Proceedings of the 9th International Neonatal Screening Sym- Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13, 1924-31.
posium; Farriaux, J., Dhont, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, (141) Rinaldo, P.; Raymond, K.; al-Odaib, A.; Bennett, M. J. Curr.
1994. Opin. Pediatr. 1998, 10, 615-21.
(97) Rashed, M. S.; Ozand, P. T.; Harrison, M. E.; Watkins, P. J. F.; (142) Bieber, L. L.; Choi, Y. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1977, 74,
Evans, S. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 8, 122-33. 2795-8.
(98) Rashed, M. S.; Ozand, P. T.; Bucknall, M. P.; Little, D. Pediatr. (143) Bieber, L. L.; Kerner, J. Methods Enzymol. 1986, 123, 264-76.
Res. 1995, 38, 324-31. (144) Roe, C. R.; Millington, D. S.; Maltby, D. A.; Bohan, T. P.; Kahler,
(99) Rashed, M. S.; Bucknall, M. P.; Little, D.; Awad, A.; Jacob, M.; S. G.; Chalmers, R. A. Pediatr. Res. 1985, 19, 459-66.
Alamoudi, M.; Alwattar, M.; Ozand, P. T. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, (145) Kerner, J.; Bieber, L. L. Prep. Biochem. 1985, 15, 237-57.
1129-41. (146) Lowes, S.; Rose, M. E. Analyst 1990, 115, 511-6.
474 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
(147) Lowes, S.; Rose, M. E.; Mills, G. A.; Pollitt, R. J. J. Chromatogr. (189) Ziadeh, R.; Hoffman, E. P.; Finegold, D. N.; Hoop, R. C.; Brackett,
1992, 577, 205-14. J. C.; Strauss, A. W.; Naylor, E. W. Pediatr. Res. 1995, 37, 675-
(148) Marzo, A.; Curti, S. J. Chromatogr. B 1997, 702, 1-20. 8.
(149) Costa, C. G.; Struys, E. A.; Bootsma, A.; ten Brink, H. J.; (190) Kimura, M.; Yamaguchi, S. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 731, 105-
Dorland, L.; Tavares de Almeida, I.; Duran, M.; Jakobs, C. J. 10.
Lipid Res. 1997, 38, 173-82. (191) Tjoa, S. S.; Fennessey, P. V. Clin. Chim. Acta 1979, 95, 35-45.
(150) Huang, Z. H.; Gage, D. A.; Bieber, L. L.; Sweeley, C. C. Anal. (192) Ramsdell, H. S.; Baretz, B. H.; Tanaka, K. Biomed. Mass
Biochem. 1991, 199, 98-105. Spectrom. 1977, 4, 220-5.
(151) Huang, Z. H.; Gage, D. A.; Bieber, L. L.; Sweeley, C. C. Prog. (193) Gregersen, N.; Keiding, K.; Kolvraa, S. Biomed. Mass Spectrom.
Clin. Biol. Res. 1992, 375, 363-8. 1979, 6, 439-43.
(152) Roe, C. R.; Hoppel, C. L.; Stacey, T. E.; Chalmers, R. A.; Tracey, (194) Bennett, M. J.; Ragni, M. C.; Ostfeld, R. J.; Santer, R.; Schmidt-
B. M.; Millington, D. S. Arch. Dis. Child 1983, 58, 916-20. Sommerfeld, E. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 1994, 31, 72-7.
(153) Roe, C. R.; Millington, D. S.; Maltby, D. A.; Bohan, T. P.; Hoppel, (195) Shimizu, N.; Yamaguchi, S.; Orii, T. Acta Paediatr. Jpn. 1994,
C. L. J. Clin. Invest. 1984, 73, 1785-8. 36, 139-45.
(154) Millington, D. S.; Roe, C. R.; Maltby, D. A. Biomed. Mass (196) Rinaldo, P.; Welch, R. D.; Previs, S. F.; Schmidt-Sommerfeld,
Spectrom. 1984, 11, 236-41. E.; Gargus, J. J.; O’Shea, J. J.; Zinn, A. B. Pediatr. Res. 1991,
(155) Chalmers, R. A.; Roe, C. R.; Stacey, T. E.; Hoppel, C. L. Pediatr. 30, 216-21.
Res. 1984, 18, 1325-8. (197) Rinaldo, P.; O’Shea, J. J.; Welch, R. D.; Tanaka, K. Biomed.
(156) Tracey, B. M.; Cheng, K. N.; Rosankiewicz, J.; Stacey, T. E.; Environ. Mass Spectrom. 1989, 18, 471-7.
Chalmers, R. A. Clin. Chim. Acta 1988, 175, 79-87. (198) Rinaldo, P.; O’Shea, J. J.; Welch, R. D.; Tanaka, K. Prog. Clin.
(157) Yergey, A. L.; Liberato, D. J.; Millington, D. S. Anal. Biochem. Biol. Res. 1990, 321, 411-8.
1984, 139, 278-83. (199) Tamvakopoulos, C. S.; Anderson, V. E. Anal. Biochem 1992, 200,
(158) Millington, D. S.; Bohan, T. P.; Roe, C. R.; Yergey, A. L.; Liberato, 381-7.
D. J. Clin. Chim. Acta 1985, 145, 69-76. (200) Duran, M.; Ketting, D.; van Vossen, R.; Beckeringh, T. E.;
(159) Duran, M.; Ketting, D.; Dorland, L.; Wadman, S. K. J. Inherited Dorland, L.; Bruinvis, L.; Wadman, S. K. Clin. Chim. Acta 1985,
Metab. Dis. 1985, 8, 143-4. 152, 253-60.
(160) Millington, D. S.; Roe, C. R.; Maltby, D. A. Biomed. Environ. (201) Tolman, K. G.; Rej, R. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry;
Mass Spectrom. 1987, 14, 711-6. Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B.
(161) Montgomery, J. A.; Mamer, O. A. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 176, 85- Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999.
95. (202) Azer, S. A.; Klaassen, C. D.; Stacey, N. H. Br. J. Biomed. Sci.
(162) Norwood, D. L.; Kodo, N.; Millington, D. S. Rapid Commun. Mass 1997, 54, 118-32.
Spectrom. 1988, 2, 269-72. (203) Roda, A.; Piazza, F.; Baraldini, M. J. Chromatogr. B 1998, 717,
(163) Millington, D. S.; Norwood, D. L.; Kodo, N.; Moore, R.; Green, 263-78.
M. D.; Berman, J. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 562, 47-58. (204) Suchy, F. J. Hepatology 1993, 18, 1274-7.
(164) Heinig, K.; Henion, J. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 735, 171-88. (205) Setchell, K. D.; Matsui, A. Clin. Chim. Acta 1983, 127, 1-17.
(165) Gaskell, S. J.; Guenat, C.; Millington, D. S.; Maltby, D. A.; Roe, (206) Setchell, K. D.; Lawson, A. M.; Tanida, N.; Sjovall, J. J. Lipid
C. R. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 2801-5. Res. 1983, 24, 1085-100.
(166) Roe, C. R.; Millington, D. S.; Maltby, D. A. J. Clin. Invest. 1986, (207) Setchell, K. D.; Ives, J. A.; Cashmore, G. C.; Lawson, A. M. Clin.
77, 1391-4. Chim. Acta 1987, 162, 257-75.
(167) Roe, C. R.; Millington, D. S.; Kahler, S. G.; Kodo, N.; Norwood, (208) Setchell, K. D.; Dumaswala, R.; Colombo, C.; Ronchi, M. J. Biol.
D. L. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1990, 321, 383-402. Chem. 1988, 263, 16637-44.
(168) Millington, D. S.; Norwood, D. L.; Kodo, N.; Roe, C. R.; Inoue, (209) Setchell, K. D.; Lawson, A. M.; Blackstock, E. J.; Murphy, G.
F. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 180, 331-9. M. Gut 1982, 23, 637-42.
(169) Bennett, M. J.; Coates, P. M.; Hale, D. E.; Millington, D. S.; (210) Setchell, K. D.; Smethurst, P.; Giunta, A. M.; Colombo, C. Clin.
Pollitt, R. J.; Rinaldo, P.; Roe, C. R.; Tanaka, K. J. Inherited Chim. Acta 1985, 151, 101-10.
Metab. Dis. 1990, 13, 707-15. (211) Vreken, P.; van Rooij, A.; Denis, S.; van Grunsven, E. G.; Cuebas,
(170) Chace, D. H.; Hillman, S. L.; Van Hove, J. L.; Naylor, E. W. Clin. D. A.; Wanders, R. J. J. Lipid Res. 1998, 39, 2452-8.
Chem. 1997, 43, 2106-13. (212) Natowicz, M. R.; Evans, J. E.; Kelley, R. I.; Moser, A. B.; Watkins,
(171) Abdenur, J. E.; Chamoles, N. A.; Guinle, A. E.; Schenone, A. B.; P. A.; Moser, H. W. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1996, 63, 356-62.
Fuertes, A. N. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1998, 21, 624-30. (213) Invernizzi, P.; Setchell, K. D.; Crosignani, A.; Battezzati, P. M.;
(172) Van Hove, J. L.; Zhang, W.; Kahler, S. G.; Roe, C. R.; Chen, Y. Larghi, A.; O’Connell, N. C.; Podda, M. Hepatology 1999, 29,
T.; Terada, N.; Chace, D. H.; Iafolla, A. K.; Ding, J. H.; 320-7.
Millington, D. S. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1993, 52, 958-66. (214) Kimura, A.; Suzuki, M.; Murai, T.; Kurosawa, T.; Tohma, M.;
(173) Shigematsu, Y.; Nakai, A.; Liu, Y. Y.; Kikawa, Y.; Sudo, M.; Sata, M.; Inoue, T.; Hoshiyama, A.; Nakashima, E.; Yamashita,
Fujioka, M. Acta Paediatr. Jpn. 1994, 36, 112-5. Y.; Fujisawa, T.; Kato, H. J. Hepatol. 1998, 28, 270-9.
(174) Delolme, F.; Vianey-Saban, C.; Guffon, N.; Favre-Bonvin, J.; (215) Kimura, A.; Suzuki, M.; Tohma, M.; Inoue, T.; Endo, F.;
Guibaud, P.; Becchi, M.; Mathieu, M.; Divry, P. Arch. Pediatr. Kagimoto, S.; Matsui, A.; Kawai, M.; Hayashi, M.; Iizuka, T.;
1997, 4, 819-26. Tajiri, H.; Kato, H. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1998, 27,
(175) Vreken, P.; van Lint, A. E.; Bootsma, A. H.; Overmars, H.; 606-9.
Wanders, R. J.; van Gennip, A. H. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1999, (216) Kimura, A.; Ushijima, K.; Suzuki, M.; Tohma, M.; Inokuchi, T.;
466, 327-37. Kato, H. Acta Paediatr. 1995, 84, 1119-24.
(176) Rashed, M. S.; Ozand, P. T.; Bennett, M. J.; Barnard, J. J.; (217) Kimura, A.; Suzuki, M.; Murai, T.; Inoue, T.; Kato, H.; Hori, D.;
Govindaraju, D. R.; Rinaldo, P. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 1109-14. Nomura, Y.; Yoshimura, T.; Kurosawa, T.; Tohma, M. J. Lipid
(177) Vreken, P.; van Lint, A. E.; Bootsma, A. H.; Overmars, H.; Res. 1997, 38, 1954-62.
Wanders, R. J.; van Gennip, A. H. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1999, (218) Abukawa, D.; Nakagawa, M.; Iinuma, K.; Nio, M.; Ohi, R.; Goto,
22, 302-6. J. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1998, 185, 227-37.
(178) Shigematsu, Y.; Hata, I.; Nakai, A.; Kikawa, Y.; Sudo, M.; (219) Meng, L. J.; Sjovall, J. J. Chromatogr. B 1997, 688, 11-26.
Tanaka, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Jakobs, C. Pediatr. Res. 1996, 39, (220) Murai, T.; Mahara, R.; Kurosawa, T.; Kimura, A.; Tohma, M. J.
680-4. Chromatogr. B 1997, 691, 13-22.
(179) Matern, D.; Strauss, A. W.; Hillman, S. L.; Mayatepek, E.; (221) Setchell, K. D.; Vestal, C. H. J. Lipid Res. 1989, 30, 1459-69.
Millington, D. S.; Trefz, F. K. Pediatr. Res. 1999, 46, 45-9. (222) Eckers, C.; East, P. B.; Haskins, N. J. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1991,
(180) Terada, N.; Inoue, F.; Okochi, M.; Nakajima, H.; Kizaki, Z.; 20, 731-9.
Kinugasa, A.; Sawada, T. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 731, 89-95. (223) Eckers, C.; New, A. P.; East, P. B.; Haskins, N. J. Rapid
(181) Inoue, F.; Terada, N.; Nakajima, H.; Okochi, M.; Kodo, N.; Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1990, 4, 449-53.
Kizaki, Z.; Kinugasa, A.; Sawada, T. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, (224) Zhang, J.; Griffiths, W. J.; Bergman, T.; Sjovall, J. J. Lipid Res.
731, 83-8. 1993, 34, 1895-900.
(182) Gempel, K.; Kottlors, M.; Jaksch, M.; Gerbitz, K. D.; Bauer, M. (225) Libert, R.; Hermans, D.; Draye, J. P.; Van Hoof, F.; Sokal, E.;
F. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1999, 22, 941-2. de Hoffmann, E. Clin. Chem. 1991, 37, 2102-10.
(183) Moder, M.; Loster, H.; Herzschuh, R.; Popp, P. J. Mass Spectrom. (226) Evans, J. E.; Ghosh, A.; Evans, B. A.; Natowicz, M. R. Biol. Mass
1997, 32, 1195-204. Spectrom. 1993, 22, 331-7.
(184) Nada, M. A.; Vianey-Saban, C.; Roe, C. R.; Ding, J. H.; Mathieu, (227) Bootsma, A. H.; Overmars, H.; van Rooij, A.; van Lint, A. E.;
M.; Wappner, R. S.; Bialer, M. G.; McGlynn, J. A.; Mandon, G. Wanders, R. J.; van Gennip, A. H.; Vreken, P. J. Inherited Metab.
Prenatal Diagn. 1996, 16, 117-24. Dis. 1999, 22, 307-10.
(185) Roe, C. R.; Cederbaum, S. D.; Roe, D. S.; Mardach, R.; Galindo, (228) Mills, K. A.; Mushtaq, I.; Johnson, A. W.; Whitfield, P. D.;
A.; Sweetman, L. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1998, 65, 264-71. Clayton, P. T. Pediatr. Res. 1998, 43, 361-8.
(186) Roe, C. R.; Roe, D. S. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1999, 68, 243-57. (229) Warrack, B. M.; DiDonato, G. C. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 22,
(187) Nada, M. A.; Chace, D. H.; Sprecher, H.; Roe, C. R. Biochem. 101-11.
Mol. Med. 1995, 54, 59-66. (230) Mushtaq, I.; Logan, S.; Morris, M.; Johnson, A. W.; Wade, A.
(188) Johnson, D. W. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1999, 22, 201-2. M.; Kelly, D.; Clayton, P. T. Br. Med. J. 1999, 319, 471-7.
MS in the Clinical Laboratory Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 475
(231) Natowicz, M. R.; Evans, J. E. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1994, 50, 364- (273) Pillai, D. N.; Earl, J. W. Pathology 1991, 23, 11-6.
7. (274) Mattammal, M. B.; Strong, R.; White, E. T.; Hsu, F. F. J.
(232) Lemonde, H. A.; Johnson, A. W.; Clayton, P. T. Rapid Commun. Chromatogr. B 1994, 658, 21-30.
Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13, 1159-64. (275) Mattammal, M. B.; Chung, H. D.; Strong, R.; Hsu, F. F. J.
(233) Setchell, K. D.; Schwarz, M.; O’Connell, N. C.; Lund, E. G.; Davis, Chromatogr. 1993, 614, 205-12.
D. L.; Lathe, R.; Thompson, H. R.; Weslie Tyson, R.; Sokol, R. (276) Artigas, F.; Gelpi, E. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 394, 123-34.
J.; Russell, D. W. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 102, 1690-703. (277) Bergquist, J.; Silberring, J. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
(234) Demers, L.; Whitley, R. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, 1998, 12, 683-8.
3rd ed.; Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B. (278) Chen, S.; Li, Q.; Carvey, P. M.; Li, K. Rapid Commun. Mass
Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999. Spectrom. 1999, 13, 1869-77.
(235) Shackleton, C. H.; Roitman, E.; Kratz, L. E.; Kelley, R. I. Steroids (279) Rifai, N.; Bachorik, P. S.; Albers, J. J. In Tietz Textbook of
1999, 64, 446-52. Clinical Chemistry; Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W.,
(236) Johnson, D. W.; Phillipou, G.; Ralph, M. M.; Seamark, R. F. Clin. Eds.; W. B. Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999.
Chim. Acta 1979, 94, 207-8. (280) Liebisch, G.; Drobnik, W.; Reil, M.; Trumbach, B.; Arnecke, R.;
(237) Honour, J. W.; Brook, C. G. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 1997, 34, 45- Olgemoller, B.; Roscher, A.; Schmitz, G. J. Lipid Res. 1999, 40,
54. 1539-46.
(238) Johnson, D. W.; Phillipou, G.; Seamark, R. F. J. Steroid Biochem. (281) Harrison, K. A.; Davies, S. S.; Marathe, G. K.; McIntyre, T.;
1981, 14, 793-800. Prescott, S.; Reddy, K. M.; Falck, J. R.; Murphy, R. C. J. Mass
(239) Johnson, D. W.; Broom, T. J.; Cox, L. W.; Matthews, C. D.; Spectrom. 2000, 35, 224-36.
Phillipou, G.; Seamark, R. F. J. Steroid Biochem. 1983, 19, 203- (282) Ellerbe, P.; Sniegoski, L. T.; Welch, M. J. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41,
7. 397-404.
(240) Shackleton, C. H. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993, 45, 127- (283) Siekmann, L. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 1991, 29, 277-
40. 9.
(241) Guzzetta, V.; De Fabiani, E.; Galli, G.; Colombo, C.; Corso, G.; (284) Duffin, K. L.; Henion, J. D.; Shieh, J. J. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63,
Lecora, M.; Parenti, G.; Strisciuglio, P.; Andria, G. Acta Paediatr. 1781-8.
1996, 85, 937-42. (285) Schiller, J.; Arnhold, J.; Benard, S.; Muller, M.; Reichl, S.;
(242) Lutjohann, D.; Papassotiropoulos, A.; Bjorkhem, I.; Locatelli, S.; Arnold, K. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 267, 46-56.
Bagli, M.; Oehring, R. D.; Schlegel, U.; Jessen, F.; Rao, M. L.; (286) Murphy, R. C.; Mathews, W. R.; Rokach, J.; Fenselau, C.
von Bergmann, K.; Heun, R. J. Lipid Res. 2000, 41, 195-8. Prostaglandins 1982, 23, 201-6.
(243) Wudy, S. A.; Wachter, U. A.; Homoki, J.; Teller, W. M.; (287) Mallat, Z.; Nakamura, T.; Ohan, J.; Leseche, G.; Tedgui, A.;
Shackleton, C. H. Steroids 1992, 57, 319-24. Maclouf, J.; Murphy, R. C. J. Clin. Invest. 1999, 103, 421-7.
(244) Wudy, S. A.; Wachter, U. A.; Homoki, J.; Teller, W. M. Horm. (288) Nakamura, T.; Bratton, D. L.; Murphy, R. C. J. Mass Spectrom.
Res. 1993, 39, 235-40. 1997, 32, 888-96.
(245) Wudy, S. A.; Wachter, U. A.; Homoki, J.; Teller, W. M. Pediatr. (289) Wheelan, P.; Murphy, R. C.; Simon, F. R. J. Mass Spectrom.
Res. 1995, 38, 76-80. 1996, 31, 236-46.
(246) Rossi, S. A.; Johnson, J. V.; Yost, R. A. Biol. Mass Spectrom. (290) Strife, R. J.; Voelkel, N. F.; Murphy, R. C. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
1994, 23, 131-9. 1987, 135, S18-21.
(247) Masse, R.; Wright, L. A. Clin. Biochem. 1996, 29, 321-31. (291) Wu, Y.; Li, L. Y.; Henion, J. D.; Krol, G. J. J. Mass Spectrom.
(248) Bowers, L. D.; Borts, D. J. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 1033-9. 1996, 31, 987-93.
(249) Shackleton, C. H.; Straub, K. M. Steroids 1982, 40, 35-51. (292) Green, K.; Vesterqvist, O.; Grill, V. Acta Endocrinol. 1988, 118,
(250) Shackleton, C. H. Clin. Chem. 1983, 29, 246-9. 301-5.
(251) Park, S. J.; Kim, Y. J.; Pyo, H. S.; Park, J. J. Anal. Toxicol. 1990, (293) Tsikas, D. J. Chromatogr. B 1998, 717, 201-45.
14, 102-8. (294) Sacks, D. B. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry; Burtis, C.
(252) Shibasaki, H.; Furuta, T.; Kasuya, Y. J. Chromatogr. B 1997, A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B. Saunders:
692, 7-14. Philidelphia, 1999.
(253) Gaskell, S. J.; Rollins, K.; Smith, R. W.; Parker, C. E. Biomed. (295) Hannestad, U.; Lundblad, A. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 794-800.
Environ. Mass Spectrom. 1987, 14, 717-22. (296) Pitkanen, E. Clin. Chim. Acta 1996, 251, 91-103.
(254) Shindo, N.; Yamauchi, N.; Murayama, K.; Fairbrother, A.; (297) Pickert, A.; Overkamp, D.; Renn, W.; Liebich, H.; Eggstein, M.
Korlik, S. Biomed. Chromatogr. 1990, 4, 171-4. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1991, 20, 203-9.
(255) Joos, P. E.; Van Ryckeghem, M. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4701- (298) Yoshioka, S.; Saitoh, S.; Seki, S.; Seki, K. Clin. Chem. 1984, 30,
10. 188-91.
(256) Nakajima, M.; Yamato, S.; Shimada, K. Biomed. Chromatogr. (299) Pitkanen, E.; Kanninen, T. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 23, 590-
1998, 12, 211-6. 5.
(257) Volmer, D. A.; Hui, J. P. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1997, (300) Reid, S.; Shackleton, C.; Wu, K.; Kaempfer, S.; Hellerstein, M.
11, 1926-33. K. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 1990, 19, 535-40.
(258) van der Hoeven, R. A.; Hofte, A. J.; Frenay, M.; Irth, H.; Tjaden, (301) Harvey, D. J. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1999, 18, 349-450.
U. R.; van der Greef, J.; Rudolphi, A.; Boos, K. S.; Marko Varga, (302) Fox, A. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 843, 287-300.
G.; Edholm, L. E. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 762, 193-200. (303) Roboz, J.; Katz, R. N. J. Chromatogr. 1992, 575, 281-6.
(259) Cirimele, V.; Kintz, P.; Dumestre, V.; Goulle, J. P.; Ludes, B. (304) Roboz, J.; Kappatos, D. C.; Greaves, J.; Holland, J. F. Clin. Chem.
Forensic Sci. Int. 2000, 107, 381-8. 1984, 30, 1611-5.
(260) Fredline, V. F.; Taylor, P. J.; Dodds, H. M.; Johnson, A. G. Anal. (305) Herold, C. D.; Fitzgerald, R. L.; Herold, D. A. Crit. Rev. Clin.
Biochem. 1997, 252, 308-13. Lab. Sci. 1996, 33, 83-138.
(261) Zimmerman, P. A.; Hercules, D. M.; Naylor, E. W. Am. J. Med. (306) Larsson, L. APMIS 1994, 102, 161-9.
Genet. 1997, 68, 300-4. (307) Heller, D. N.; Cotter, R. J.; Fenselau, C.; Uy, O. M. Anal. Chem.
(262) Seedorf, U.; Fobker, M.; Voss, R.; Meyer, K.; Kannenberg, F.; 1987, 59, 2806-9.
Meschede, D.; Ullrich, K.; Horst, J.; Benninghoven, A.; Assmann, (308) Timmins, E. M.; Howell, S. A.; Alsberg, B. K.; Noble, W. C.;
G. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 548-52. Goodacre, R. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 367-74.
(263) Rosano, T.; Whitley, R. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, (309) Milne, D. B. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry; Burtis, C.
3rd ed.; Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B. Saunders:
Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999. Philadelphia, 1999.
(264) Graham, P. E.; Smythe, G. A.; Edwards, G. A.; Lazarus, L. Ann. (310) Chan, S.; Gerson, B.; Reitz, R. E.; Sadjadi, S. A. Clin. Lab. Med.
Clin. Biochem. 1993, 30, 129-34. 1998, 18, 615-29.
(265) Duncan, M. W.; Compton, P.; Lazarus, L.; Smythe, G. A. N. Engl. (311) Nuttall, K. L.; Gordon, W. H.; Ash, K. O. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.
J. Med. 1988, 319, 136-42. 1995, 25, 264-71.
(266) Jacob, K.; Vogt, W.; Schwertfeger, G. J. Chromatogr. 1984, 290, (312) Krachler, M.; Irgolic, K. J. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 1999, 13,
331-7. 157-69.
(267) Bando, K.; Hayashi, C.; Miyai, K. Med. J. Osaka Univ. 1981, (313) Forrer, R.; Gautschi, K.; Stroh, A.; Lutz, H. J. Trace Elem. Med.
31, 101-10. Biol. 1999, 12, 240-7.
(268) Kema, I. P.; Meiborg, G.; Nagel, G. T.; Stob, G. J.; Muskiet, F. (314) Michalke, B.; Schramel, P. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 2547-53.
A. J. Chromatogr. 1993, 617, 181-9. (315) Silva Da Rocha, M.; Soldado, A. B.; Blanco-Gonzalez, E.; Sanz-
(269) Smythe, G. A.; Edwards, G.; Graham, P.; Lazarus, L. Clin. Chem. Medel, A. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2000, 14, 6-7.
1992, 38, 486-92. (316) Kotrebai, M.; Tyson, J. F.; Block, E.; Uden, P. C. J. Chromatogr.
(270) Edwards, G. A.; Smythe, G. A.; Graham, P. E.; Lazarus, L. Med. A 2000, 866, 51-63.
J. Aust. 1992, 156, 153-7. (317) Yates, J. R., III. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 1-19.
(271) Tuchman, M.; Lemieux, B.; Auray-Blais, C.; Robison, L. L.; (318) Gevaert, K.; Vandekerckhove, J. Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1145-
Giguere, R.; McCann, M. T.; Woods, W. G. Pediatrics 1990, 86, 54.
765-73. (319) Haynes, P. A.; Yates, J. R., III. Yeast 2000, 17, 81-7.
(272) Gleispach, H.; Huber, E.; Fauler, G.; Kerbl, R.; Urban, C.; Leis, (320) Pandey, A.; Mann, M. Nature 2000, 405, 837-46.
H. J. Nutrition 1995, 11, 604-6. (321) Lopez, M. F. J. Chromatogr. B 1999, 722, 191-202.
476 Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 Chace
(322) Bienvenut, W. V.; Sanchez, J. C.; Karmime, A.; Rouge, V.; Rose, (363) Lapolla, A.; Fedele, D.; Plebani, M.; Garbeglio, M.; Seraglia, R.;
K.; Binz, P. A.; Hochstrasser, D. F. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4800- D’Alpaos, M.; Arico, C. N.; Traldi, P. Rapid Commun. Mass
7. Spectrom. 1999, 13, 8-14.
(323) Berndt, P.; Hobohm, U.; Langen, H. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, (364) Lapolla, A.; Fedele, D.; Plebani, M.; Aronica, R.; Garbeglio, M.;
3521-6. Seraglia, R.; D’Alpaos, M.; Traldi, P. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 288-
(324) Blackstock, W. P.; Weir, M. P. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 121- 90.
7. (365) Resemann, A.; Mayer-Posner, F. J.; Lapolla, A.; Fedele, D.; M,
(325) Loo, J. A.; DeJohn, D. E.; Du, P.; Stevenson, T. I.; Ogorzalek D. A.; Traldi, P. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12, 805-
Loo, R. R. Med. Res. Rev. 1999, 19, 307-19. 7.
(326) Packer, N. H.; Harrison, M. J. Electrophoresis 1998, 19, 1872- (366) Niwa, T.; Naito, C.; Mawjood, A. H.; Imai, K. Clin. Chem. 2000,
82. 46, 82-8.
(327) Kelleher, N. L. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, R37-R45. (367) Hounsell, E. F.; Young, M.; Davies, M. J. Clin. Sci. 1997, 93,
(328) Shackleton, C. H.; Witkowska, H. E. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 29A- 287-93.
33A. (368) Choudhary, G.; Chakel, J.; Hancock, W.; Torres-Duarte, A.;
(329) Jungblut, P. R.; Zimny-Arndt, U.; Zeindl-Eberhart, E.; Stulik, McMahon, G.; Wainer, I. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 855-9.
J.; Koupilova, K.; Pleissner, K. P.; Otto, A.; Muller, E. C.; (369) Chong, B. E.; Lubman, D. M.; Rosenspire, A.; Miller, F. Rapid
Sokolowska-Kohler, W.; Grabher, G.; Stoffler, G. Electrophoresis Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12, 1986-93.
1999, 20, 2100-10. (370) Stocklin, R.; Vu, L.; Vadas, L.; Cerini, F.; Kippen, A. D.; Offord,
(330) Fairbanks, V.; Klee, G. In Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, R. E.; Rose, K. Diabetes 1997, 46, 44-50.
3rd ed.; Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Tietz, N. W., Eds.; W. B. (371) Nilsson, C. L.; Karlsson, G.; Bergquist, J.; Westman, A.; Ekman,
Saunders: Philadelphia, 1999. R. Peptides 1998, 19, 781-9.
(331) Shackleton, C. H.; Falick, A. M.; Green, B. N.; Witkowska, H. (372) Ostergaard, M.; Rasmussen, H. H.; Nielsen, H. V.; Vorum, H.;
E. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 562, 175-90. Orntoft, T. F.; Wolf, H.; Celis, J. E. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 4111-
(332) Lubin, B. H.; Witkowska, H. E.; Kleman, K. Clin. Biochem. 1991, 7.
24, 363-74. (373) Westman, A.; Nilsson, C. L.; Ekman, R. Rapid Commun. Mass
(333) Wada, Y.; Hayashi, A.; Fujita, T.; Matsuo, T.; Katakuse, I.; Spectrom. 1998, 12, 1092-8.
Matsuda, H. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1981, 667, 233-41. (374) Puchades, M.; Westman, A.; Blennow, K.; Davidsson, P. Rapid
(334) Jensen, O. N.; Hojrup, P.; Roepstorff, P. Anal. Biochem. 1991, Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13, 2450-5.
199, 175-83. (375) Davidsson, P.; Westman, A.; Puchades, M.; Nilsson, C. L.;
(335) Jensen, O. N.; Roepstorff, P.; Rozynov, B.; Horanyi, M.; Szelenyi, Blennow, K. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 642-7.
J.; Hollan, S. R.; Aseeva, E. A.; Spivak, V. A. Biol. Mass (376) Caprioli, R. M.; Farmer, T. B.; Gile, J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69,
Spectrom. 1991, 20, 579-84. 4751-60.
(336) Jensen, O. N.; Roepstorff, P. Hemoglobin 1991, 15, 497-507. (377) Beranova-Giorgianni, S.; Desiderio, D. M. Rapid Commun. Mass
(337) Ferranti, P.; Malorni, A.; Pucci, P.; Fanali, S.; Nardi, A.; Ossicini, Spectrom. 2000, 14, 161-7.
L. Anal. Biochem. 1991, 194, 1-8. (378) Nelson, R. W.; Nedelkov, D.; Tubbs, K. A. Electrophoresis 2000,
(338) Ferranti, P.; Parlapiano, A.; Malorni, A.; Pucci, P.; Marino, G.; 21, 1155-63.
Cossu, G.; Manca, L.; Masala, B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, (379) Holland, R.; J., W.; Rafii, F.; Sutherland, J.; Persons, C. Rapid
1162, 203-8. Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 10, 1227-32.
(339) Ferranti, P.; Malorni, A.; Pucci, P. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 231, (380) Claydon, M.; Davey, S.; Edwards-Jones, V.; Gordon, D. Nat.
45-65. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 1584-1586.
(340) Deon, C.; Prome, J. C.; Prome, D.; Francina, A.; Groff, P.; Kalmes, (381) Welham, K. J.; Domin, M. A.; Scannell, D. E.; Cohen, E.; Ashton,
G.; Galacteros, F.; Wajcman, H. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, D. S. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12, 176-80.
880-7. (382) Cain, T.; Lubman, D.; Weber, W. Rapid Commun. Mass Spec-
(341) De Biasi, R.; Spiteri, D.; Caldora, M.; Iodice, R.; Pucci, P.; trom. 1994, 8, 1026-30.
Malorni, A.; Ferranti, P.; Marino, G. Hemoglobin 1988, 12, 323- (383) Smole, S. C.; King, L. A.; Leopold, P. E.; Arbeit, R. D. J.
36. Microbiol. Methods (in press).
(342) Pucci, P.; Ferranti, P.; Marino, G.; Malorni, A. Biomed. Environ. (384) Palmer-Toy, D. E. Clin. Chem. (in press).
Mass Spectrom. 1989, 18, 20-6. (385) Chong, B. E. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13, 1808-
(343) Pucci, P.; Carestia, C.; Fioretti, G.; Mastrobuoni, A. M.; Pagano, 12.
L. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1985, 130, 84-90. (386) Conway, G. C.; Smole, S. C.; Sarracino, D. A.; Arbeit, R. D.;
(344) Nakanishi, T.; Miyazaki, A.; Kishikawa, M.; Shimizu, A.; Aoki, Leopold, P. E. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (in press).
Y.; Kikuchi, M. Hemoglobin 1998, 22, 23-35. (387) Leopold, P. Presented at the American Association of Clinical
(345) Nakanishi, T.; Miyazaki, A.; Kishikawa, M.; Shimizu, A.; Aoki, Chemistry 52nd Annual Meeting and Expo, San Francisco, 2000.
K.; Kikuchi, M. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 565-9. (388) Klose, J. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 643-52.
(346) Nakanishi, T. Rinsho Byori 1999, 47, 224-31. (389) Fields, G. B. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 1108-9.
(347) Houston, C. T.; Reilly, J. P. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. (390) Koster, H.; Tang, K.; Fu, D. J.; Braun, A.; van den Boom, D.;
1997, 11, 1435-9. Smith, C. L.; Cotter, R. J.; Cantor, C. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996,
(348) De Caterina, M.; Esposito, P.; Grimaldi, E.; Di Maro, G.; 14, 1123-8.
Scopacasa, F.; Ferranti, P.; Parlapiano, A.; Malorni, A.; Pucci, (391) Taranenko, N. I.; Matteson, K. J.; Chung, C. N.; Zhu, Y. F.;
P.; Marino, G. Clin. Chem. 1992, 38, 1444-8. Chang, L. Y.; Allman, S. L.; Haff, L.; Martin, S. A.; Chen, C. H.
(349) Reynolds, T. M.; McMillan, F.; Smith, A.; Hutchinson, A.; Green, Genet. Anal. 1996, 13, 87-94.
B. J. Clin. Pathol. 1998, 51, 467-70. (392) Taranenko, N. I.; Golovlev, V. V.; Allman, S. L.; Taranenko, N.
(350) Brennan, S. O.; Matthews, J. R. Hemoglobin 1997, 21, 393- V.; Chen, C. H.; Hong, J.; Chang, L. Y. Rapid Commun. Mass
403. Spectrom. 1998, 12, 413-8.
(351) Wada, Y.; Tamura, J.; Musselman, B. D.; Kassel, D. B.; Sakurai, (393) Griffin, T. J.; Smith, L. M. Trends Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 77-84.
T.; Matsuo, T. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 6, 9-13. (394) Griffin, T. J.; Hall, J. G.; Prudent, J. R.; Smith, L. M. Proc. Natl.
(352) Adamczyk, M.; Gebler, J. C. Bioconjugate Chem. 1997, 8, 400- Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 6301-6.
6. (395) Graber, J.; O’Donnell, M.; Smith, C.; Cantor, C. Curr. Opin.
(353) Light-Wahl, K. J.; Loo, J. A.; Edmonds, C. G.; Smith, R. D.; Biotechnol. 1998, 9, 14-8.
Witkowska, H. E.; Shackleton, C. H.; Wu, C. S. Biol. Mass (396) Dobrowolski, S. F.; Banas, R. A.; Naylor, E. W.; Powdrill, T.;
Spectrom. 1993, 22, 112-20. Thakkar, D. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 1999, 88, 61-4.
(354) Witkowska, H. E.; Green, B. N.; Morris, M.; Shackleton, C. H. (397) Tang, K.; Fu, D. J.; Julien, D.; Braun, A.; Cantor, C. R.; Koster,
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1995, S111-5. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 10016-20.
(355) Falick, A. M.; Shackleton, C. H.; Green, B. N.; Witkowska, H. (398) Kirpekar, F.; Nordhoff, E.; Larsen, L. K.; Kristiansen, K.;
E. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1990, 4, 396-400. Roepstorff, P.; Hillenkamp, F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26,
(356) Houston, C. T.; Reilly, J. P. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 3397-404. 2554-9.
(357) Shafer, F. E.; Lorey, F.; Cunningham, G. C.; Klumpp, C.; (399) Humphery-Smith, I.; Cordwell, S. J.; Blackstock, W. P. Electro-
Vichinsky, E.; Lubin, B. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 1996, 18, phoresis 1997, 18, 1217-42.
36-41. (400) Doktycz, M. J.; Hurst, G. B.; Habibi-Goudarzi, S.; McLuckey, S.
(358) Hayashi, A.; Wada, Y.; Matsuo, T.; Katakuse, I.; Matsuda, H. A.; Tang, K.; Chen, C. H.; Uziel, M.; Jacobson, K. B.; Woychik,
Acta Haematol. 1987, 78, 114-8. R. P.; Buchanan, M. V. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 230, 205-14.
(359) Lane, P. A.; Witkowska, H. E.; Falick, A. M.; Houston, M. L.; (401) Crain, P. F.; McCloskey, J. A. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1998, 9,
McKinna, J. D. Am. J. Hematol. 1993, 44, 158-61. 25-34.
(360) Roberts, N. B.; Green, B. N.; Morris, M. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, (402) Limbach, P. A.; Crain, P. F.; McCloskey, J. A. Curr. Opin.
771-8. Biotechnol. 1995, 6, 96-102.
(361) Peterson, K. P.; Pavlovich, J. G.; Goldstein, D.; Little, R.; (403) Costello, C. E. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999, 10, 22-8.
England, J.; Peterson, C. M. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44, 1951-8. (404) Fitzgerald, M. C.; Smith, L. M. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol.
(362) Willekens, E.; Thienpont, L. M.; Stockl, D.; Kobold, U.; Hoelzel, Struct. 1995, 24, 117-40.
W.; De Leenheer, A. P. Clin. Chem. 2000, 46, 281-3. (405) Sukhodub, L. F. Ukr. Biokhim. Zh. 1989, 61, 16-30.
MS in the Clinical Laboratory Chemical Reviews, 2001, Vol. 101, No. 2 477
(406) Porcelli, B.; Muraca, L. F.; Frosi, B.; Marinello, E.; Vernillo, R.; (423) Thompson, J. A.; Markey, S. P. Anal. Chem. 1975, 47, 1313-
De Martino, A.; Catinella, S.; Traldi, P. Rapid Commun. Mass 21.
Spectrom. 1997, 11, 398-404. (424) Claeys, M.; Markey, S. P.; Maenhaut, W. Biomed. Mass Spec-
(407) Liu, C.; Wu, Q.; Harms, A. C.; Smith, R. D. Anal. Chem. 1996, trom. 1977, 4, 122-8.
68, 3295-9. (425) Stockl, D.; Dewitte, K.; Thienpont, L. M. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44,
(408) Liu, Y. H.; Bai, J.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, X.; Siemieniak, D.; Venta, P. 2340-6.
J.; Lubman, D. M. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 9, (426) Schoeller, D. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1976, 3, 265-71.
735-43. (427) Petersen, P. H.; Ricos, C.; Stockl, D.; Libeer, J. C.; Baaden-
(409) Srinivasan, J. R.; Liu, Y. H.; Venta, P. J.; Siemieniak, D.; Killeen, huijsen, H.; Fraser, C.; Thienpont, L. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin.
A. A.; Zhu, Y.; Lubman, D. M. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. Biochem. 1996, 34, 983-99.
1997, 11, 1144-50. (428) Stockler, M. Med. Decision Making 1992, 12, 76-7.
(410) Schmitz, G.; Aslanidis, C.; Lackner, K. J. Pathol. Oncol. Res. (429) Webster, D.; Dhondt, J. L.; Hannon, W. H.; Loeber, G.; Torresani,
1998, 4, 152-60. T. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 1999, 88, 7-12.
(411) Little, D. P.; Braun, A.; Darnhofer-Demar, B.; Koster, H. Eur. (430) Ricos, C.; Baadenhuijsen, H.; Libeer, C. J.; Petersen, P. H.;
J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 1997, 35, 545-8. Stockl, D.; Thienpont, L.; Fraser, C. C. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin.
(412) Ch’ang, L. Y.; Tang, K.; Schell, M.; Ringelberg, C.; Matteson, K. Biochem. 1996, 34, 159-65.
J.; Allman, S. L.; Chen, C. H. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. (431) Sosnoff, C. S.; Ann, Q.; Bernert, J. T., Jr.; Powell, M. K.; Miller,
1995, 9, 772-4. B. B.; Henderson, L. O.; Hannon, W. H.; Fernhoff, P.; Sampson,
(413) Little, D. P.; Braun, A.; Darnhofer-Demar, B.; Frilling, A.; Li, E. J. J. Anal. Toxicol. 1996, 20, 179-84.
Y.; McIver, R. T., Jr.; Koster, H. J. Mol. Med. 1997, 75, 745-50. (432) Barr, J. R.; Maggio, V. L.; Patterson, D. G., Jr.; Cooper, G. R.;
(414) Griffey, R. H. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 377-390. Henderson, L. O.; Turner, W. E.; Smith, S. J.; Hannon, W. H.;
(415) Fitzgerald, R. L.; Herold, D. A.; Yergey, A. L. Clin. Chem. 1997, Needham, L. L.; Sampson, E. J. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42, 1676-
43, 915. 82.
(416) Markey, S. P. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1981, 8, 426-30. (433) Henderson, L. O.; Powell, M. K.; Hannon, W. H.; Bernert, J. T.,
(417) Vidal, C.; Kirchner, G. I.; Wunsch, G.; Sewing, K. F. Clin. Chem. Jr.; Pass, K. A.; Fernhoff, P.; Ferre, C. D.; Martin, L.; Franko,
1998, 44, 1275-82. E.; Rochat, R. W.; Brantley, M. D.; Sampson, E. Biochem. Mol.
(418) Kessler, A.; Siekmann, L. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 1523-9. Med. 1997, 61, 143-51.
(419) Wu, A. H.; Bristol, B.; Sexton, K.; Cassella-McLane, G.; Holtman, (434) Bernert, J. T., Jr.; Turner, W. E.; Pirkle, J. L.; Sosnoff, C. S.;
V.; Hill, D. W. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 1051-7. Akins, J. R.; Waldrep, M. K.; Ann, Q.; Covey, T. R.; Whitfield,
(420) Kock, R.; Delvoux, B.; Greiling, H. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 1896- W. E.; Gunter, E. W.; Miller, B. B.; Patterson, D. G., Jr.;
903. Needham, L. L.; Hannon, W. H.; Sampson, E. J. Clin. Chem.
(421) Thienpont, L. M.; Leenheer, A. P.; Stockl, D.; Reinauer, H. Clin. 1997, 43, 2281-91.
Chem. 1993, 39, 1001-6. (435) Van Hove, J. L. K. Duke University Medical Center, 1994.
(422) Eckfeldt, J. H.; Lewis, L. A.; Belcher, J. D.; Singh, J.; Frantz, I.
D., Jr. Clin. Chem. 1991, 37, 1161-5. CR990077+