Synthesis of Judith Butler's Gender Trouble
Synthesis of Judith Butler's Gender Trouble
Synthesis of Judith Butler's Gender Trouble
Synthesis Paper 3
LLS0107 SECTION 1 May 17, 2021
The political and legal conditions of women are shaped by the juridical systems
of power, which simultaneously restrict and produce the subjects it is meant to govern
over. These state practices and policies demand a universal definition for woman in
order to regulate and “protect” them as individuals (Butler, 1990, p. 3). However, by
creating stable and immutable guidelines on sex and gender identity, there is the issue
of inevitable exclusion of intersectional and visceral experiences – such as race, class,
sexuality, location, and other constituting parts of personhood. The state and its
services will then only cover the circumstances of women who belong to an ideal
category as defined by a Western and masculine pre-requisite of foundationalism.
The juridical system and phallogocentric language then create a standard for
sex and gender within a heterosexual matrix of intelligibility. By forcing a universal
“truth” in sex and gender, there are distinctions made into what is acceptable and valid.
According to Butler (1990), compulsory heterosexuality is a patriarchal regulation of
“coherent” norms in which a stable sex must be equivalent to a stable expression of
gender identity. For example, the male must be masculine and attracted to women –
just as the female must be feminine and attracted to men.
Derrida, J. (1970). Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.
New York : Columbia University Press.
Leitch, V. (2001). Judith Butler. In V. Leitch, The Norton Anthology of Criticism (pp.
2485-2488). London: W.W. Norton & Company.