Raft For 145 146 149 150
Raft For 145 146 149 150
Raft For 145 146 149 150
Distribution:
RAFT FOUNDATION HAVING 4 COLUMNS MARKED F1
Footing Dimensions
Consider the following sketch
Z'
5.450
C D
Z Z 6.800
8.800
= = = =
0.750 0.750
1.100 C3 C4
=
= 149 X 150 X
1.000
Z Z
X'
A B
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Note: The "X" and "Z" are the axes in global direction at each column location and sign convension are as per the
right hand thumb rule only the vertical downward forces are considered as positive.
The cg of the column in Z direction is same as the cg of the foundation.
The cell in red colour are the corresponding node numbers.
Lx = 5.450
Lz = 8.800
D= 1.500
Effective Cover = 0.08
Effective Depth, d = 1.43
The point A, B, C & D are the four corners of the foundation.
Column Dimensions
In X-direction = 0.750
In Z-direction = 1.100
For the following calculations consider the corner "A" as origin. And the axes passing through are X' and Z' as shown. The
sign convension, the horizontal are positive along the axes where as the vertical downward is positive and clockwise moment
are positive.
Wt. Of footing = Wf = 179.85 acting at the centroid of the foundation plan area.
Wt. Of soil = Ws = 0.00 (Assume fraction of soil to be considered is 0.000 )
D. L. = 179.85
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
100 23.08 -3.59 -0.28 -1.18 14.59
101 12.79 -1.25 -0.27 -1.17 5.11
102 33.36 -5.93 -0.28 -1.20 24.07
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
103 21.78 -2.17 -0.59 -2.93 8.84
104 1.00 2.26 0.06 0.93 -9.36
105 45.25 -9.42 -0.60 -3.03 38.44
106 24.47 -4.99 0.04 0.83 20.23
107 22.90 -5.61 3.41 13.60 22.91
108 2.12 -1.18 4.06 17.46 4.71
109 44.14 -5.98 -4.54 -19.31 24.38
110 23.36 -1.55 -3.90 -15.45 6.18
111 27.65 -3.98 -0.59 -2.96 16.24
112 6.87 0.45 0.06 0.91 -1.96
113 39.38 -7.61 -0.60 -3.01 31.04
114 18.60 -3.18 0.05 0.86 12.83
115 28.21 -5.70 1.41 5.31 23.28
116 7.42 -1.27 2.06 9.17 5.07
117 38.83 -5.89 -2.57 -11.15 24.01
118 18.05 -1.46 -1.92 -7.28 5.81
119 13.02 -3.40 2.99 12.31 13.83
120 33.13 -3.78 -3.54 -14.68 15.35
121 5.07 0.67 -0.27 -1.15 -2.62
122 41.09 -7.84 -0.29 -1.22 31.81
123 4.94 -1.56 3.05 12.61 6.33
124 25.05 -1.94 -3.48 -14.38 7.85
125 -3.02 2.51 -0.21 -0.85 -10.12
126 33.01 -6.00 -0.23 -0.92 24.31
127 13.70 -0.33 -0.53 -2.64 1.35
128 -7.08 4.11 0.12 1.23 -16.86
129 37.17 -7.58 -0.55 -2.73 30.94
130 16.38 -3.15 0.10 1.13 12.74
131 14.82 -3.77 3.47 13.90 15.41
132 -5.96 0.66 4.12 17.76 -2.79
133 36.06 -4.14 -4.48 -19.01 16.88
134 15.28 0.30 -3.84 -15.15 -1.32
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
100 55.86 -3.23 -0.33 -1.37 13.26
101 65.05 -0.90 -0.34 -1.39 3.79
102 46.67 -5.57 -0.33 -1.36 22.73
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
103 56.11 -1.63 -0.64 -3.16 6.54
104 77.32 2.41 -0.02 0.60 -9.62
105 34.43 -8.87 -0.62 -3.07 36.12
106 55.65 -4.84 -0.01 0.69 19.96
107 35.15 -5.11 3.74 14.95 20.77
108 56.37 -1.08 4.36 18.70 4.61
109 55.37 -5.39 -4.95 -20.92 21.90
110 76.59 -1.35 -4.33 -17.16 5.74
111 50.69 -3.44 -0.64 -3.14 13.93
112 71.90 0.60 -0.02 0.62 -2.22
113 39.85 -7.06 -0.63 -3.09 28.72
114 61.07 -3.03 -0.01 0.67 12.57
115 40.21 -5.18 1.55 5.92 21.05
116 61.43 -1.15 2.17 9.68 4.89
117 50.32 -5.32 -2.79 -12.02 21.61
118 71.54 -1.28 -2.17 -8.26 5.46
119 46.61 -3.09 3.31 13.66 12.68
120 65.11 -3.37 -3.98 -16.40 13.85
121 71.93 1.02 -0.34 -1.40 -3.93
122 39.79 -7.48 -0.32 -1.35 30.46
123 21.48 -1.38 3.40 14.05 5.68
124 39.97 -1.67 -3.89 -16.01 6.84
125 46.80 2.72 -0.25 -1.01 -10.93
126 14.66 -5.77 -0.24 -0.95 23.45
127 30.97 0.08 -0.56 -2.77 -0.47
128 52.19 4.12 0.06 0.99 -16.62
129 9.30 -7.17 -0.54 -2.68 29.11
130 30.52 -3.13 0.08 1.08 12.96
131 10.02 -3.41 3.83 15.34 13.76
132 31.24 0.63 4.45 19.09 -2.39
133 30.24 -3.68 -4.86 -20.53 14.89
134 51.45 0.36 -4.24 -16.77 -1.26
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
100 23.08 -3.59 0.28 1.18 14.59
101 12.79 -1.25 0.27 1.17 5.11
102 33.36 -5.93 0.28 1.20 24.07
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
103 21.72 -2.17 0.58 3.15 8.84
104 0.94 2.26 -0.06 -0.71 -9.36
105 45.19 -9.42 0.60 3.25 38.43
106 24.40 -4.99 -0.04 -0.62 20.23
107 44.08 -5.98 4.54 19.52 24.38
108 23.30 -1.55 3.90 15.66 6.17
109 22.84 -5.61 -3.42 -13.38 22.91
110 2.06 -1.18 -4.06 -17.25 4.70
111 27.59 -3.98 0.59 3.17 16.24
112 6.80 0.45 -0.06 -0.69 -1.97
113 39.32 -7.61 0.60 3.22 31.03
114 18.54 -3.18 -0.05 -0.64 12.83
115 38.77 -5.89 2.57 11.36 24.01
116 17.98 -1.45 1.92 7.50 5.80
117 28.14 -5.70 -1.41 -5.09 23.27
118 7.36 -1.27 -2.06 -8.96 5.07
119 33.13 -3.78 3.54 14.68 15.35
120 13.02 -3.40 -2.99 -12.31 13.83
121 5.07 0.67 0.27 1.15 -2.62
122 41.09 -7.84 0.29 1.22 31.81
123 25.05 -1.94 3.48 14.38 7.85
124 4.94 -1.56 -3.05 -12.61 6.33
125 -3.02 2.51 0.21 0.85 -10.12
126 33.01 -6.00 0.23 0.92 24.31
127 13.64 -0.33 0.52 2.85 1.34
128 -7.15 4.11 -0.12 -1.01 -16.86
129 37.10 -7.58 0.54 2.95 30.94
130 16.32 -3.15 -0.10 -0.91 12.73
131 36.00 -4.14 4.48 19.23 16.88
132 15.22 0.30 3.84 15.37 -1.32
133 14.76 -3.77 -3.47 -13.68 15.41
134 -6.03 0.66 -4.12 -17.54 -2.79
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
100 55.86 -3.23 0.33 1.37 13.26
101 65.05 -0.90 0.34 1.39 3.79
102 46.67 -5.57 0.33 1.36 22.73
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Load Case P Fx Fz Mx Mz
103 56.04 -1.63 0.65 3.39 6.54
104 77.26 2.41 0.03 -0.37 -9.62
105 34.37 -8.87 0.63 3.30 36.12
106 55.58 -4.84 0.01 -0.46 19.96
107 55.31 -5.39 4.95 21.15 21.90
108 76.52 -1.35 4.33 17.39 5.74
109 35.09 -5.11 -3.74 -14.72 20.77
110 56.31 -1.08 -4.36 -18.48 4.61
111 50.62 -3.44 0.64 3.36 13.93
112 71.84 0.60 0.02 -0.40 -2.22
113 39.79 -7.06 0.63 3.32 28.72
114 61.00 -3.03 0.01 -0.44 12.57
115 50.26 -5.32 2.79 12.24 21.61
116 71.47 -1.28 2.18 8.49 5.46
117 40.15 -5.18 -1.55 -5.69 21.05
118 61.37 -1.15 -2.17 -9.45 4.89
119 65.11 -3.37 3.98 16.40 13.85
120 46.61 -3.09 -3.31 -13.66 12.68
121 71.93 1.02 0.34 1.40 -3.93
122 39.79 -7.48 0.32 1.35 30.46
123 39.97 -1.67 3.89 16.01 6.84
124 21.48 -1.38 -3.40 -14.05 5.68
125 46.80 2.72 0.25 1.01 -10.93
126 14.66 -5.77 0.24 0.95 23.45
127 30.91 0.08 0.56 2.99 -0.47
128 52.13 4.12 -0.06 -0.76 -16.62
129 9.24 -7.17 0.54 2.91 29.11
130 30.45 -3.13 -0.08 -0.85 12.96
131 30.17 -3.68 4.87 20.76 14.89
132 51.39 0.36 4.25 17.00 -1.26
133 9.96 -3.41 -3.82 -15.11 13.76
134 31.18 0.63 -4.44 -18.87 -2.39
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
In the above load data the sign convension are as per STAAD but in case P it is positive in downward direction.
The point of action of the column loads, selfweight of foundation & soil weight are given below.
Here the coordinates are w.r.t. X' and Z' axes.
Item Cordinate
X' Z'
Column C1 1.000 7.800
Column C2 4.450 7.800
Column C3 1.000 1.000
Column C4 4.450 1.000
Foundation ,Wf 2.725 4.400
Soil, Ws 2.725 4.400
Consider the following table for calculation of gross resultant forces and eccentricity
Load Cases without wind or seismic load
Load Case Resultant Forces Position Eccenticity Location
P Mx' Mz' X' Z' ex ez Quadrant
100 337.7 1485.97 977.67 2.895 4.400 0.170 0.000 IV
101 335.5 1476.31 1076.78 3.209 4.400 0.484 0.000 IV
102 339.9 1495.63 878.58 2.585 4.400 0.140 0.000 IV
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Consider the following figure and table for calculation of gross pressure.
Z C
L of the footing
C D
II I
X X CL of the footing
III IV
A B
Z
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
P Mx Mz FA FB FC FD
100 337.7 0.00 57.39 5.72 8.36 5.72 8.36 OK
101 335.5 0.00 162.47 3.27 10.73 3.27 10.73 OK
102 339.9 0.00 47.70 5.99 8.18 5.99 8.18 OK
P Mx Mz FA FB FC FD
103 335.5 0.02 87.66 4.98 9.01 4.98 9.01 OK
104 336.4 0.02 301.27 0.10 13.93 0.10 13.93 OK
105 339.1 0.02 186.42 11.35 2.79 11.35 2.79 OK
106 340.0 0.02 27.19 6.46 7.71 6.46 7.71 OK
107 337.3 209.74 49.45 11.15 8.88 5.19 2.92 OK
108 338.2 209.75 164.16 6.26 13.80 0.30 7.84 OK
109 337.3 209.71 49.45 5.19 2.92 11.15 8.88 OK
110 338.2 209.71 164.17 0.30 7.84 6.26 13.80 OK
111 336.4 0.02 19.14 6.57 7.45 6.57 7.45 OK
112 337.3 0.02 232.75 1.69 12.38 1.69 12.37 OK
113 338.2 0.02 117.90 9.76 4.35 9.76 4.34 OK
114 339.1 0.02 95.71 4.87 9.27 4.87 9.27 OK
115 337.3 104.88 49.41 9.66 7.39 6.68 4.41 OK
116 338.2 104.89 164.20 4.77 12.31 1.79 9.33 OK
117 337.3 104.85 49.41 6.68 4.41 9.66 7.39 OK
118 338.2 104.85 164.20 1.79 9.33 4.77 12.31 OK
119 337.7 188.28 57.39 8.40 11.04 3.05 5.68 OK
120 337.7 188.28 57.39 3.05 5.68 8.40 11.04 OK
121 333.8 0.00 243.78 1.36 12.56 1.36 12.56 OK
122 341.6 0.00 129.01 4.16 10.08 4.16 10.08 OK
123 271.3 188.28 27.57 7.70 8.97 2.35 3.61 OK
124 271.3 188.28 27.57 2.35 3.61 7.70 8.97 OK
125 267.4 0.00 213.96 0.66 10.49 0.66 10.49 OK
126 275.2 0.00 158.82 2.09 9.38 2.09 9.38 OK
127 269.1 0.02 57.84 4.28 6.94 4.28 6.94 OK
128 269.9 0.02 271.45 -0.60 11.86 -0.60 11.86 Dist. Pr.
129 272.7 0.02 216.24 10.65 0.72 10.65 0.72 OK
130 273.5 0.02 2.63 5.76 5.64 5.76 5.64 OK
131 270.9 209.74 79.27 10.45 6.81 4.49 0.85 OK
132 271.7 209.74 134.35 5.56 11.73 -0.40 5.77 Dist. Pr.
133 270.9 209.71 79.27 4.49 0.85 10.45 6.81 OK
134 271.7 209.71 134.35 -0.40 5.77 5.56 11.73 Dist. Pr.
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Maximum developed bearing force in load cases without wind or seismic = 10.73 t/m2
Maximum developed bearing force in load cases with wind or seismic = 13.93 t/m2
Minimum developed bearing force in load cases without wind or seismic = 3.27 t/m2
Minimum developed bearing force in load cases with wind or seismic = -0.60 t/m2
As the negetive pressure developed, there is requirement of redistribution of pressure, shown in next sheet
Here Dist. Pr. Means Distribute the Negetive pressure
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Distribution of Negetive Pressure
Distribution:
Distribution:
Distribution:
b) Overturning Check
Distribution:
Here the unfactored load intensity is taken from the base pressure developed. Later that is converted into factored
gross base pressure. Finally factored net bearing pressure is calculated and that is applied in design. All the following
steps are described as below.
Design of Footing:
The footing will be designed for the stress of 15.27 t/m2
Consider the unit meter width of footing. To calculate the designed bending moment and shear force that the
footing will be subjected to, consider the following sketch.
Now the footing will be subjected to a upward force 15.27 t/m
And also the footing will be subjected to a downward force 6.53 t/m
Here we consider the support location at each column location and are pinned.
Then apply the load as calculated above. Finaly the bending moment and shear force diagram are shown and will
be used for designed bending moment and shear force.
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Footing in the direction parallel to X axis
w= 15.27 w= 6.53
15.1 6.46
Thus maximum designed bending moments per meter width of the raft are as follows
Mu = 7.64 t-m at bottom of footing in longitudinal direction
= 15.10 t-m at top of footing in longitudinal direction
80.6 34.47
Distribution:
Calculation of Reinforcement:
Bottom Reinforcement in X-direction Bottom Reinforcement in Z-direction
Designed moment = Mu = 7.64 t-m Designed moment = Mu = 7.64 t-m
Effective depth required = d = 149 mm Effective depth required = d = 149 mm
Effective depth provided = d = 1425 mm Effective depth provided = d = 1425 mm
OK OK
As we consider the unit width, Mu/bd2 = 0.04 As we consider the unit width, Mu/bd2 = 0.04
Thus the percentage of steel , pt = 0.01 Thus the percentage of steel , pt = 0.01
Thus Ast required = 149 mm2/m width Thus Ast required = 149 mm2/m width
Ast minimum = 1800 mm2/m width Ast minimum = 1800 mm2/m width
Hence Ast to be provided = 1800 mm2/m Hence Ast to be provided = 1800 mm2/m
Bar size = 20 mm Bar size = 20 mm
Spacing required = 174.53 mm Spacing required = 174.53 mm
Provide spacing = 150 mm Provide spacing = 150 mm
Thus Ast provided = 2094.4 mm /m width
2
Thus Ast provided = 2094.4 mm2/m width
pt = 0.15 pt = 0.15
Top Reinforcement in X-direction Top Reinforcement in Z-direction
Designed moment = Mu = 15.10 t-m Designed moment = Mu = 80.60 t-m
Effective depth required = d = 209 mm Effective depth required = d = 483 mm
Effective depth provided = d = 1425 mm Effective depth provided = d = 1425 mm
OK OK
As we consider the unit width, Mu/bd = 2
0.07 As we consider the unit width, Mu/bd2 = 0.40
Thus the percentage of steel , pt = 0.02 Thus the percentage of steel , pt = 0.11
Thus Ast required = 295 mm /m width
2
Thus Ast required = 1596 mm /m width
2
Side Reinforcement:
As the depth of the foundation is more than 750 mm. Hence we need to provide side face reinforcement. These
have to provided in the shape of ring.
Hence provide 4 nos. tor 16 at each face, will form a rectange ring.
JACOBS ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD. Project No. Document / Item Reference
Distribution:
Distribution:
DETAIL OF RAFT FOUNDATION MARKED RF1
DRAWING
FGL
0.200
18 - tor 25
tor 10 @ 100
tor 20 @ 100 c/c 2.000 3.500
tor 20 @ 150 c/c
SECTION A-A
5.450
6.800
8.800
= = = =
0.750 0.750
1.100 P1 P1
=
=
1.000
PLAN
(All dimensions are in m.)
FORMULA AND COEFFICIENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION FOR RECTANGULAR SHAPES:
VALUES OF COEFFICIENT,I
ez/b
ex/a 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.3 0.32 0.34
0 1 1.12 1.24 1.36 1.48 1.6 1.72 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.22 2.38 2.56 2.78 3.03 3.33 3.7 4.17
0.02 1.12 1.24 1.36 1.48 1.6 1.72 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.21 2.36 2.53 2.72 2.95 3.22 3.54 3.93 4.42
0.04 1.24 1.36 1.48 1.6 1.72 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.21 2.35 2.5 2.68 2.88 3.13 3.41 3.75 4.17 4.69
0.06 1.36 1.48 1.6 1.72 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.21 2.34 2.49 2.66 2.84 3.06 3.32 3.62 3.98 4.43 4.98
0.08 1.48 1.6 1.72 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.21 2.34 2.46 2.64 2.82 3.02 3.26 3.52 3.84 4.23 4.7 5.28
0.1 1.6 1.72 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.21 2.34 2.48 2.63 2.8 2.99 3.2 3.46 3.74 4.08 4.49 4.99 5.62
0.12 1.72 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.21 2.34 2.48 2.63 2.8 2.98 3.18 3.41 3.65 3.98 4.36 4.78 5.31 5.97
0.14 1.84 1.96 2.08 2.21 2.34 2.46 2.63 2.79 2.97 3.17 3.39 3.64 3.92 4.24 4.63 5.09 5.68
0.16 1.96 2.06 2.21 2.34 2.48 2.63 2.8 2.97 3.17 3.38 3.62 3.88 4.18 4.53 4.94 5.43 6.04
0.18 2.08 2.21 2.35 2.49 2.64 2.8 2.98 3.17 3.38 3.61 3.86 4.15 4.47 4.84 5.28 5.81 6.48
0.2 2.22 2.36 2.51 2.66 2.82 2.99 3.18 3.39 3.62 3.86 4.14 4.44 4.79 5.19 5.66 6.23
0.22 2.36 2.53 2.66 2.84 3.02 3.2 3.41 3.64 3.88 4.15 4.44 4.77 5.15 5.57 6.08 6.69
0.24 2.56 2.72 2.88 3.06 3.25 3.46 3.68 3.92 4.18 4.47 4.79 5.15 5.55 6.01 6.56
0.26 2.78 2.95 3.13 3.32 3.52 3.74 3.98 4.24 4.53 4.84 5.19 5.57 6.01 6.51
0.28 3.03 3.22 3.41 3.62 3.84 4.06 4.35 4.63 4.94 5.26 5.66 6.08 6.56
0.3 3.33 3.54 3.75 3.98 4.23 4.49 4.78 5.09 5.43 5.81 6.23 6.69
0.32 3.7 3.93 4.17 4.43 4.7 4.99 5.31 5.66 6.04 6.46
0.34 4.17 4.42 4.6 4.96 5.28 5.62 5.97
4Cx
Z
4Cx-a a (= Lx)
Maximum edge pressure= (IQ/A)X(1/10) kg/cm2
b-z α Cz
Where, I= coefficient(to be determined from above table) R .
ez
Q= Total vertical load on foundation ,in tonnes
X X
A= axb, in m2 z ex Cx 4Cz
b (= Lz)
a= Length of the foundation( dim ║ to x-x axis), in m,
α
b= Width of the foundation( dim ║ to z-z axis), in m,
4Cz-b
ex = Eccentricity along x-x axis ,in m x a-x