CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 32 (2017) 5–8

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

journal homepage: www.casereports.com

Duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma, successfully treated by local

surgical excision-a case report
Dimetrios Papaconstantinou a , Nikolaos Machairas b , Vasileia Damaskou c ,
Nikolaos Zavras d,∗ , Christine Kontopoulou e , Anastasios Machairas a
a
3rd Department of Surgery, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
b
2nd Department of Surgery, General Hospital “Laiko”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
c
2nd Department of Pathology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
d
Pediatric Surgery Department, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
e
Second Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: INTRODUCTION: Duodenal gangliocytic paragangliomas are rare neoplasms often arising in proximity
Received 8 September 2016 to the major duodenal papilla of Vater. These neoplasms are considered to have a benign behavior with
Received in revised form 9 January 2017 lymph node metastases being a rare phenomenon and distant metastatic disease even more so. Resection
Accepted 17 January 2017
of the tumor is the only definitive therapy.
Available online 19 January 2017
PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 67 year old male presented to a referring hospital with symptoms of fatigue
and malaise. Evaluation with CT imaging revealed a 3.1 cm intraluminal mass situated grossly at the
Keywords:
junction of the third with the fourth portion of the duodenum. The tumor was found to be situated near
Gangliocytic paraganglioma
Duodenum
the ampulla of Vater and was excised through a longitudinal duodenotomy followed by myotomy of the
Surgical excision sphincter of Oddi.
Case report DISCUSSION: Complete resection of duodenal gangliocytic paragangliomas by surgical or endoscopic
means is the only potential cure. Endoscopic removal is the first option and is both safe and adequate.
However, localized excision may be utilized instead in those cases in which endoscopic removal is not
possible or cannot achieve negative margins. Recurrent disease after complete resection is unlikely.
CONCLUSION: Cases of duodenal gangliocytic paragangliomas are best managed with endoscopic resec-
tion. However, local surgical excision remains as a second-choice procedure. Adjuvant chemotherapy
and radiotherapy are unnecessary after complete excision.
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. This is an open
access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1. Introduction a challenging case of a DGP, situated near the ampulla, treated with
local surgical excision instead of a radical procedure. Our report is
Duodenal gangliocytic paragangliomas (DGPs) are rare neo- in accordance with the SCARE criteria [5].
plasms often arising in proximity to the major duodenal papilla
of Vater [1]. These tumors are often mistaken for other gastroin-
testinal tract neoplasms, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors 2. Case report
(GISTs), and accurate diagnosis is unlikely without a histologic
examination demonstrating the three key characteristic compo- A 67 year old male presented to a referring hospital with symp-
nents of the tumor: epithelioid, spindle-shaped, and ganglion-like toms of fatigue and malaise, which were attributed to anemia
cells [1]. These neoplasms are considered to have a benign behavior with hemoglobin value of 6.1 g/dL, and hematocrit of 19.4%. Fur-
with lymph node metastases being a rare phenomenon and distant ther hematological investigation including white blood cells, liver
metastatic disease even more so [2–4]. Resection of the tumor is the function tests, INR, blood urea, blood creatinine, and electrolytes
only definitive therapy. This may be achieved through either endo- were within normal ranges. Tumor markers (CEA, CA 19.9, CA 125,
scopic or surgical resection. The aim of this case report is to present CA 15.3, and ␣-fetoprotein) were normal as well. Initial work-
up consisted of a computed tomography (CT)-scan imaging which
revealed an intraluminal mass measuring 3 cm in diameter, and
∗ Corresponding author at: Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Gen-
situated grossly at the junction of the third to the fourth portion
eral Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian, University of
of the duodenum (Fig. 1). No regional lymphadenopathy or evi-
Athens, 1 Rimini str., Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece. dence of metastatic lesions were noted. A colonoscopy was normal
E-mail address: [email protected] (N. Zavras). and an upper GI endoscopy did not demonstrate any lesion aside

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.01.046
2210-2612/© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
 CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
6 D. Papaconstantinou et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 32 (2017) 5–8

Fig. 1. Axial CT-scan of the abdomen after IV contrast medium administration shows Fig. 3. Circumscribed tumor with yellow to white cut surface.
an oval shape (white arrow), well circumscribed mass in the third part of the duo-
denum, with maximum diameter of 3 cm.

Fig. 4. A circumscribed, but not encapsulated, tumor is noticed on scanning magni-

Fig. 2. After catheterization of the common bile duct (white arrow), a longitudinal fication (Haematoxylin and Eosin stain: 4×).
duodenal incision was performed to visualize the tumor (yellow arrow).

operative course was uneventful, with improvement of hemoglobin

from a diffuse gastritis. Capsule endoscopy employed thereafter values and the patiet was discharged on day 13 postoperatively.
demonstrated a non-occluding mass lesion in close proximity to A CT-scan (not mentioned here) at 8 months postoperatively was
the duodenal papilla. The patient was referred to our hospital, a normal and at a 5-year follow-up, the patient is alive and free of
tertiary care center, for further surgical management of this lesion disease.
which was initially considered to be a gastrointestinal stromal
tumor (GIST). The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy, 2.1. Pathological findings
revealing no metastatic burden and local excision of the mass was
contemplated. After sufficient mobilization of the second and third Macroscopically, after formalin fixation, a fairly circumscribed
portions of the duodenum with a Kocher maneuver, the common tumor with a yellow to white cut surface was seen (Fig. 3). Exci-
bile duct was catheterized through a small incision, and the tip of sion appeared, just complete in the sections examined . The lesion
the catheter advanced into the lumen of the duodenum through the was, focally, extending within less than 0.1 mm from the circumfer-
ampulla of Vater. Subsequently, a longitudinal duodenal incision ential margin. Pathology review of the specimen revealed a fairly
was performed to allow direct visualization of the ampulla and the circumscribed tumor located in the duodenal submucosa and mus-
adjacent tumor (Fig. 2). The mass was excised together with the cularis propria (Fig. 4), composed mainly of epithelioid cells with
submucosa of the duodenum and the ampulla, with the catheter a variable admixture of spindle Schwann like cells and ganglion
allowing proper identification and preservation of the major duo- like cells (Fig. 5). The epithelioid element of endocrine origin was
denal papilla. Myotomy of the sphincter of Oddi was performed diffusely positive for synaptophysin (Fig. 6a) and immunoreactive,
to prevent postoperative obstruction from scar tissue. The third albeit focally, for CKAE1/AE3 (Fig. 6b). In contrast, spindle cells
portion of the duodenum was divided with a linear cutter and were positive for S-100 (Fig. 6c) whereas both spindle and gan-
reconstruction followed, with a duodenojejunal anastomosis and a glions like cells were positive for neurofilament staining (Fig. 6d). In
jejunojejunal anastomosis performed at 40 cm of length. The post- addition synaptophysin and chromogranin staining of ganglion like
 CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
D. Papaconstantinou et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 32 (2017) 5–8 7

Fig. 5. Three distinct types of cells are evident: epithelioid, spindle Schwann like
and ganglion like cells.

cells was evident. The immunoistochemical analysis together with

the morphologic findings of the specimens therefore supported the
diagnosis of a duodenal GP.

3. Discussion

GPs, in the majority of cases, arise in the duodenum and show a

slight male predominance (reported 1.5:1 male-female ratio). They
affect individuals of age ranging from 15 to 85 years of age, with
GI bleeding and anemia being the most common presenting symp-
tom [2], with abdominal pain and obstructive jaundice having been
reported as well [6]. Abdominal CT imaging and endoscopy are
unlikely to yield an accurate diagnosis and therefore, mistaking
this tumor for a GIST or a neuroendocrine neoplasm is common.
The main focus of treatment is removal of the lesion either by
endoscopy or surgery. Although GPs are considered to be benign, 23
cases of lymph node metastasis, 3 cases of distant metastases and
one death have been reported [2–4,6]. This suggests a metastatic
potential for these tumors. Factors associated with lymph node
metastases have been reported to be young age and possibly the
vertical extent of the tumor in the submucosa [2].
Complete excision of the mass by surgical or endoscopic means
is the only cure. Endoscopic removal is the first option in GPs and
is both safe and adequate [7–9]. In the case of a periampullary or a
large lesion, however, endoscopic resection may be challenging or
impossible and therefore surgical resection of the lesion remains
as the only therapeutic option. A pancreaticoduodenectomy may
be employed for removal of the primary tumor as well as lymph
nodes harboring possible metastases. However, taking into account
the fact that lymph node metastases are a rare phenomenon in this
type of disease, a less radical approach towards the removal of the
tumor may be selected, in those cases in which lymphadenopathy
is absent in preoperative imaging studies [8,10,11]. The surgical
approach we employed consisted of complete removal of the tumor
situated in proximity to the major duodenal papilla, followed by a Fig. 6. a) Staining for synaptophysin in epithelioid (endocrine) cells. b) Focal posi-
sphincteroplasty and catheterization of the ampulla. This proce- tivity for CKAE1/AE3 in epithelioid cells. c) S-100 highlights the spindle (Schwann
dure avoids the mortality and morbidity of a Whipple procedure like) component. d) NF positivity in both spindle and ganglion like cells.
and its postoperative complications such as pancreatic fistula and
bile leak, while ensuring adequate resection margins. A sphinctero-
plasty is mandatory in this scenario to avoid postoperative biliary
obstruction from scar tissue. setting of a margin negative resection has not been documented in
Recurrent disease after resection is unlikely, with only one such literature. Postoperative chemotherapy for this particular disease
case reported in literature in a patient underwent a R1 resection has not been employed. Accurate long term outcomes are limited
[12]. Adjuvant radiotherapy, although having been employed in due to the rarity of GPs. Follow-up by a multidisciplinary team is
two cases [4,13], is unnecessary, since disease recurrence in the the recommended course of action after a complete excision.
 CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
8 D. Papaconstantinou et al. / International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 32 (2017) 5–8

4. Conclusion References

DGPs are rare entities that are best managed by a margin free [1] Y. Okubo, T. Nemoto, M. Wakayama, N. Tochigi, M. Shinozaki, T. Ishiwatari,
et al., Gangliocytic paraganglioma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in
resection. In those cases in which preoperative imaging does not Japan, BMC Cancer 15 (2015) 269.
suggest regional disease, endoscopic resection is the treatment [2] Y. Okubo, M. Wakayama, T. Nemoto, K. Kitahara, H. Nakayama, K. Shibuya,
of choice, with local surgical excision through a duodenotomy et al., Literature survey on epidemiology and pathology of gangliocytic
paraganglioma, BMC Cancer 11 (2011) 187.
reserved for those in which endoscopic R0 resection is impossi- [3] C. Henry, H. Ghalel-Méchaoui, N. Bottero, T. Pradier, H. Moindrot, Gangliocytic
ble. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy are unnecessary after paraganglioma of the pancreas with bone metastasis, Ann. Chir. 128 (2003)
complete excision and routine surveillance appears to be a safe 336–338.
[4] Bin Li, Yang Li, Xiao-Ying Tian, Bo-Ning Luo, Zhi Li, Malignant gangliocytic
option. paraganglioma of the duodenum with distant metastases and a lethal course,
World J. Gastroenterol. 20 (2014) 15454–15461.
Conflict of interest [5] R.A. Agha, A.J. Fowler, A. Saetta, I. Barai, S. Rajmohan, D.P. Orgill, for the SCARE
Group, The SCARE Statement: consensus-based surgical case report
guidelines, Int. J. Surg. (2016) (in press).
There is no conflict of interest to be declared. [6] C. Rowsell, N. Coburn, R. Chetty, Gangliocytic paraganglioma: a rare case with
metastases of all 3 elements to liver and lymph nodes, Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 15
(2011) 467–471.
Funding [7] A. Sathyamurthy, A. Choudhary, D. Ng, S. Okponobi, A. Diaz-Arias, A. Grewal,
Obstructive jaundice due to a rare periampullary tumor, World J. Gastrointest.
No source of funding. Oncol. 5 (2013) 195–197.
[8] S.J. Park, H. Kim do, H. Lim, J.H. Lee, K.D. Choi, H.J. Song, et al., Endoscopic
resection as a possible radical treatment for duodenal gangliocytic
Consent paraganglioma: a report of four cases, Korean J. Gastroenterol. 63 (2014)
114–119.
[9] J.I. Yang, J.S. Choi, G.H. Lee, B.W. Kim, S.J. Moon, M.S. Kang, et al., A case of
Consent has been taken.
ampullary gangliocytic paraganglioma, Korean J. Internal Med. 29 (2014)
375–378.
Author contribution [10] J. Chen, E. Sharon, S. Morgenstern, A. Geller, F. Greif, Local surgical resection of
gangliocytic paraganglioma of the duodenal papilla, Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 11
(2009) 311–312.
Papakonstantinou D: He wrote the paper. [11] J. Sucandy, G. Avers, D.J. Bertsch, Surgical management of endoscopically
Zavras N: He reviewed the paper unresectable duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma in a patient with partial
Damaskou V: Pathologist performed the histological examina- upper gastrointestinal obstruction, N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2 (2010) 547–551.
[12] D.B. Dookhan, M. Miettinen, G. Finkel, Z. Gibas, Recurrent duodenal
tion. gangliocytic paraganglioma with lymph node metastases, Histopathology 22
Contopoulou Chr: Radiologist performed the evaluation of the (1993) 399–401.
CT-scan. [13] A. Wong, A.R. Miller, J. Metter, C.R. Thomas, Locally advanced duodenal
gangliocytic paraganglioma treated with adjuvant radiation therapy: case
Mahairas A: Surgeon performed the operation and follow-up. report and review of the literature, World J. Surg. Oncol. 3 (2005) 15.

Open Access
This article is published Open Access at sciencedirect.com. It is distributed under the IJSCR Supplemental terms and conditions, which
permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are
credited.