Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 24 views

    Research Abstract Evaluation Criteria: Introduction / Originality

    Uploaded by

    Xochitl Diaz
    This document provides evaluation criteria for assessing a research abstract. It outlines 7 criteria: introduction/originality, research question/hypothesis, study design, methods, results, conclusions, and readability/organization. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, with 3 being the highest score. Comments can also be provided for each criterion. The criteria focus on establishing the importance and novelty of the research, clearly stating the research question or hypothesis, using an appropriate study design, thoroughly describing the methods, presenting results that directly address the research question, drawing conclusions supported by the results, and clearly communicating the abstract.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Research Abstract Evaluation Criteria: Introduction / Originality

    Uploaded by

    Xochitl Diaz
    24 views1 page
    This document provides evaluation criteria for assessing a research abstract. It outlines 7 criteria: introduction/originality, research question/hypothesis, study design, methods, results, conclusions, and readability/organization. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, with 3 being the highest score. Comments can also be provided for each criterion. The criteria focus on establishing the importance and novelty of the research, clearly stating the research question or hypothesis, using an appropriate study design, thoroughly describing the methods, presenting results that directly address the research question, drawing conclusions supported by the results, and clearly communicating the abstract.

    Original Title

    Abstract Scoring

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides evaluation criteria for assessing a research abstract. It outlines 7 criteria: introduction/originality, research question/hypothesis, study design, methods, results, conclusions, and readability/organization. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, with 3 being the highest score. Comments can also be provided for each criterion. The criteria focus on establishing the importance and novelty of the research, clearly stating the research question or hypothesis, using an appropriate study design, thoroughly describing the methods, presenting results that directly address the research question, drawing conclusions supported by the results, and clearly communicating the abstract.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    24 views1 page

    Research Abstract Evaluation Criteria: Introduction / Originality

    Uploaded by

    Xochitl Diaz
    This document provides evaluation criteria for assessing a research abstract. It outlines 7 criteria: introduction/originality, research question/hypothesis, study design, methods, results, conclusions, and readability/organization. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, with 3 being the highest score. Comments can also be provided for each criterion. The criteria focus on establishing the importance and novelty of the research, clearly stating the research question or hypothesis, using an appropriate study design, thoroughly describing the methods, presenting results that directly address the research question, drawing conclusions supported by the results, and clearly communicating the abstract.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Research Abstract Evaluation Criteria

    CRITERION SCORE COMMENTS


    Introduction / Originality
    The introduction: establishes the importance of research, describes a need for the 0
    research: 1
     generates new knowledge, 2
     answer whether a previous observation can be replicated, 3
     document if previous findings can be applied to a different population
    Research Question or Hypothesis
    The stated research question is: 0
    focused, important, and feasible to study. 1
    or 2
    The stated hypothesis is: simple, specific, 3
    important, and testable.
    Study Design 0
    The stated design is: a documentable quantitative, qualitative, or hybrid study design, 1
    concisely stated, and the most efficient study design needed to get a satisfactory answer 2
    to the research question. 3
    Methods
    0
    The methods:
    1
    describe a stepwise approach to what was done, identify primary end points/outcomes,
    2
    utilize existing instruments or procedures when possible, maximize internal and external
    3
    validity, and minimize bias/error.
    Results
    0
    The results: pertain directly to the research question use design-appropriate raw data to
    1
    characterize the primary and secondary outcomes, include design-appropriate inferential
    2
    or descriptive statistical indices, and avoid interpretations, explanations, and
    3
    speculations.
    Conclusions
    0
    The conclusion: addresses the original research question or hypothesis, must be
    1
    supported by the results, does not extrapolate beyond the results of study,
    2
    does not repeat the results, and does not introduce findings not presented in the results
    3
    section.
    Readability and Organization 0
    The abstract: clearly communicates thoughts and concepts, uses concise writing; avoids 1
    repetition and wordiness, 2
    utilizes professional language and style, and is free of grammatical or technical errors. 3
    0
    Overall Impression 1
    The overall impression evaluates the entire abstract, as a whole. 2
    3

    You might also like