Luis Leal and Manuel M - Martín-Rodríguez: Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008

[ 17 ]
Chicano literature
Luis Leal and Manuel M . Martín-Rodríguez
H o w can the inclusion of a section on C h i c a n o literature in a history of

Latin A m e r i c a n literature be justified? In order to answer that question it
is necessary to examine briefly t w o topics, the nature of national literature
and the nature of C h i c a n o literature itself. R e g a r d i n g the first, it can be
observed that in the field of literary criticism there are t w o extreme
positions: one that denies the existence of a national, regional, or ethnic
literature; and another that accepts that concept. Renee Wellek and
Austin W a r r e n , in their b o o k , Theory of Literature, dedicate a chapter to
a discussion of " G e n e r a l , C o m p a r a t i v e , and N a t i o n a l Literature," in
w h i c h they state:
T h e term " w o r l d literature," a translation of Goethe's Weltliteratur, is
perhaps needlessly grandiose, implying that literature should be studied
on all five continents, from N e w Zealand to Iceland. Goethe, actually,
had no such thing in mind. " W o r l d literature" was used by him to
indicate a time when all literatures would become one. It is the ideal of
the unification of all literatures in one great synthesis, where each
nation would play its part in a universal concert. But Goethe himself
saw that this is a very distant ideal, that no single nation is willing to
give up its individuality. T o d a y we are possibly even further removed
from such a state of amalgamation, and we would argue that we cannot
even seriously wish that the diversities of national literatures should be
obliterated. (Harcourt, 1956: 37)
T h e same could be said about regional and ethnic literatures, and even for
those written in a language other than the national language of a given
country. In reference to the study of M e d i e v a l English literature, Wellek
and W a r r e n state that " A history of literature during the M i d d l e A g e s in
England w h i c h neglected the vast a m o u n t of writings in Latin and A n g l o -
N o r m a n gives a false picture of England's literary situation and general
culture" (p. 40).
In his b o o k , Puertas al campo (1966), O c t a v i o Paz gives expression to
the opposite theory. H e states:
557
Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. University of Western Ontario, on 28 Jan 2017 at 00:14:44, subject to the Cambridge Core
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008
terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521340700.019
C A M B R I D G E H I S T O R Y OF L A T I N A M E R I C A N LITERATURE
Literature or Hispanic-American literature? If we open a book about

the history of Ecuador or the Argentine, we find a chapter dedicated to
their national literature. N o w then, nationalism is not only a moral
aberration, but also a deceiving aesthetic. Nothing distinguishes Argen
tinean from Uruguayan literature, nor Mexican from Guatemalan.
Literature transcends frontiers. (p. 12)
If this theory is accepted, C h i c a n o literature could not be studied

independently. Y e t C h i c a n o s are not ready or willing to give up their o w n
cultural identity, and insist on being considered as an ethnic g r o u p w h o s e
literature contributes, on the one hand, to the enrichment of the kaleido
scopic nature of N o r t h A m e r i c a n literature, and, on the other, to the
creation of a bridge between that literature and Latin A m e r i c a n letters,
especially since C h i c a n o literature is written in both English and Spanish,
or in a combination of the t w o languages. Even in Latin A m e r i c a , many
intellectuals reject the Pan-Americanist ideas of O c t a v i o Paz, preferring to
stress those traits that differentiate national cultures or, at least, the
cultures of certain socio-geographical areas (such as the A n d e s , etc.). Paz
himself seems to fluctuate between the internationalism of Puertas al
campo and a search for the national essences in his earlier El laberinto de
la soledad (1950) [Labyrinth of Solitude]. In the latter, he described
C h i c a n o pachucos as a sort of aberration of the M e x i c a n national and, in
doing so, implicitly alluded to traits of a national culture shared by all
M e x i c a n s , as well as to deviations from it: " W h e t h e r w e like it or not,
these are M e x i c a n s , one of the extremes to w h i c h a M e x i c a n can g e t " (p.
13)-
T h e f o l l o w i n g problem arises, then: to w h a t national literature d o the
people of M e x i c a n descent w h o are (or were) citizens or permanent
residents of the United States belong? T h e question is valid only w h e n
considering that literature written by C h i c a n o s since 1848 (1836 in
T e x a s ) . W o r k s produced before those years rightfully belong to the field
of H i s p a n i c / M e x i c a n letters, for w h a t is n o w the Southwest of the United
States (hereafter referred to as the Southwest) w a s first part of the Spanish
Empire in A m e r i c a , and later of the Republic of M e x i c o . T h e s e earlier
texts can rightfully be considered the antecedent of C h i c a n o literature, as
they were written about the same space, the same people, and the same
culture as contemporary literature is. It could also be said that this
H i s p a n i c / M e x i c a n literature reflects a n e w sensibility, w h i c h is the result
of factors that characterize the culture of M e x i c o ' s northern frontier. T h e
influence of the landscape, the g e o g r a p h y , the climate, and the nature and
culture of the inhabitants gave that literature a tonality different from that
found in the literature of central M e x i c o . W h a t is today the Southwest
w a s a region almost isolated from the seat of government in the M e x i c a n
capital, and therefore developed its o w n frontier culture, molded by daily
558
Chicano literature
conflicts with the native peoples. T h e settlers of w h a t are n o w the

borderlands, from the very beginning, developed different attitudes and a
different sense of place from that of the inhabitants of other regions of
M e x i c o . W i t h the passing of time, a distinct literary tradition w a s formed,
w h i c h has been preserved uninterrupted to this day.
T h e culture of the Hispanic period (1542-1821) contributed important
elements in determining the nature of contemporary C h i c a n o life. It w a s
during that early period that S p a n i s h / M e x i c a n culture w a s firmly estab-
lished in the Southwest, w i t h the introduction of the Spanish language, the
Catholic religion w i t h the mission system, the political and military
(presidio) systems, Spanish l a w s , agriculture and mining. O f course,
poetry and the chronicle were also introduced into the Southwest during
the sixteenth century by explorers, friars, and secular writers such as
A l v a r N ú ñ e z C a b e z a de V a c a (1490?—1559?), Fray M a r c o s de N i z a ( ? -
1558), G a s p a r Pérez de Villagrá (1555-1620), A l o n s o de L e ó n ( 1 5 9 0 -
1661), Juan Bautista de A n z a (1734-1788), Fray Junípero Serra (1713—
1784), and many others. A t the same time, the settlers brought with them
their romances, pastorelas, villancicos, and other forms of popular
literature w h i c h they had learned in their places of origin in M e x i c o -
most of them brought there from Spain, although some were of native
origin.
N ú ñ e z C a b e z a de V a c a ' s Naufragios (1542) [Castaways] is a narrative
w h i c h reads very much like a novel of adventures. T h i s is an important
w o r k for being the first in w h i c h the landscape and nature of the region, as
well as the life and customs of the native inhabitants, are described. It is a
narrative told from the perspective of a participant in the march across the
continent from Florida to M e x i c o by four survivors of a tragic shipwreck.
Some of C a b e z a de V a c a ' s allusions to large communities in the Southwest
were associated w i t h the fabled Seven Cities. In turn, these remarks
motivated later expeditions by others, and finally led to the colonization
of the Southwest.
In his Relación (1539), Fray M a r c o s de N i z a also makes reference to the
Seven Cities, in highly hyperbolic terms. His description of one of them,
C i b o l a , presents it as a city rich in gold, precious stones, and natural
resources, and with a population larger than that of M e x i c o City. N i z a ' s
depiction of C i b o l a incited the greed of the viceroyal authorities, as well as
that of other explorers. O f importance to the contemporary C h i c a n o s is
N i z a ' s association of communities in N e w M e x i c o w i t h the European
myth of the Seven Cities, since Aztecs considered a place having seven
caves - called C h i c o m o s t o c or A z t l á n - as their place of origin. T h i s myth
of A z t l á n , resurrected more recently by the C h i c a n o s , provided a rallying
point for the social movement of the 1960s as well as the consequent
rebirth of C h i c a n o literature, as w e shall see.
559
T h e myth of the Seven Cities became a topos of this literature and w a s

also retold by G a s p a r Perez de Villagra, the author of the epic p o e m
Historia de la Nueva Mexico (1610) [History of New Mexico]. He
believed that A z t l a n w a s located in N e w M e x i c o , the region explored and
conquered in 1598 by Juan de Oiiate, in w h o s e army Villagra held the rank
of procurador general. "It is well k n o w n in fact," he w r o t e , "that the
ancient M e x i c a n races, w h o in ages past founded M e x i c o City, came from
these regions. T h e y gave the city their name that their m e m o r y might be
eternal and imperishable, imitating in this the immortal R o m u l u s w h o
first raised the walls of ancient R o m e " (1933: 42). Villagra's p o e m , in
thirty-four cantos of hendecasyllabic verse and one prose passage, is not
the history of the Aztecs, but a detailed account of Oiiate's expedition. In
spite of the poetic form, Villagra's w o r k is a simple narrative in verse with
occasional lyrical passages, especially at the beginning of each canto. It is
important in the literary history of the Southwest because it describes the
landscape of N e w M e x i c o and gives information about its people, thus
creating one of the first literary images of the region. O f importance also is
Villagra's account of the staging, in 1598, of a play by M a r c o s Farfan de
los G o d o s , the first theatrical presentation in the Southwest. " T h e
governor [Oiiate] then ordered a large chapel built under a grove of shady
trees. Here the priests celebrated a solemn high M a s s , after w h i c h the
learned commissary preached an excellent sermon. T h e n some of the
soldiers enacted a drama written by C a p t a i n Farfan. T h i s drama pictured
the advent of the friars to N e w M e x i c o " (p. 129). In the last eight cantos of
his p o e m , Villagra relates the fall of A c o m a , a description praised by
M a b e l M a j o r in her b o o k Southwest Heritage (1938), with these w o r d s :
"It is annoying to find A m e r i c a n history and letters continually described
as a style tradition with its genesis in the M a y f l o w e r and the Bay Psalm
B o o k . . . Villagra's account of the heroic capture of A c o m a by Z a l d i v a r
and seventy men bears comparison with the scaling of the heights outside
Q u e b e c by W o l f e if one keeps all of the circumstances in m i n d " (p. 33).
Like the epic p o e m , La Araucana ( 1 5 6 9 , 1 5 7 8 , 1 5 8 9 ) by A l o n s o de Ercilla
(15 33-1594), considered by many critics to be the antecedent of later
Chilean literature, V i l l a g r a ' s p o e m represents the precursor of that of
New Mexico.
Villagra's p o e m , like all other w o r k s written before 1848 by the
Spanish-speaking inhabitants of the Southwest, has something that
identifies it as belonging to the early literature of the region: he contem
plated and described a n e w w o r l d never before seen by European eyes. A l l
authors writing at the time in the area described the landscape and gave an
account of the native populations, as well as the cultural changes
experienced by the explorers and settlers themselves in their confron
tation w i t h this n e w environment. W h a t the C h i c a n o critic Philip D .
560
Chicano literature
O r t e g o says about N e w W o r l d literatures in general applies perfectly well

to the early literature of the Southwest: "In the N e w W o r l d , Spanish
literature underwent a unique metamorphosis, integrating alien elements
w h i c h were to herald a distinct kind of N e w W o r l d literature" ( " C h i c a n o
Poetry: R o o t s and W r i t e r s , " 3). Indigenous elements are found not only in
Villagrá's p o e m , but also in the Memorial. . . (1630) of Fray A l o n s o de
Benavides, in w h i c h he describes the culture of the Indians of T e x a s ; in the
early ethnographic w o r k of Fray G e r ó n i m o Boscana ( 1 7 7 6 - 1 8 3 1 ) , Chinig-
chinich (1831), about the Indians in the San D i e g o mission in California;
and in the drama Los comanches, written between 1 7 7 4 and 1778 by an
u n k n o w n soldier, in w h i c h the hero, the C o m a n c h e chief C u e r n o V e r d e , is
presented as proud, brave, dauntless, and a w a r e of his exalted position:
Y o soy aquel capitán,

no capitán, poco he dicho.
De todos soy gran señor.
(A. L. Campa, " L o s Comanches,
N e w M e x i c o Folk D r a m a , " 28)
[I'm that captain,
nay, not captain, but more.
Of all the people I'm the lord.]
By the time of the M e x i c a n W a r s of Independence ( 1 8 1 0 - 1 8 2 1 ) , and due

to the neglect of the northern provinces by the central government, the
inhabitants of the borderlands had attained a high degree of self-
sufficiency. Therefore, a desire for the establishment of an independent
political entity became prevalent. A s early as 1 8 1 3 , Bernardo Gutiérrez de
Lara declared T e x a s an independent state. H o w e v e r , he did not succeed in
his effort, as he w a s soon defeated by the Spanish armies. H o w e v e r , the
sentiment did not disappear, and by 1836 several M e x i c a n s favored the
idea of declaring T e x a s independent from the M e x i c a n republic. T h r e e
prominent M e x i c a n s from T e x a s , a m o n g them the writer L o r e n z o de
Z a v a l a (1788-1836), author of the b o o k s Ensayos... (1831) and Viaje a los
Estados Unidos de Norteamérica (1834), attended the convention in
W a s h i n g t o n where the independence of T e x a s w a s made a reality on
M a r c h 22, 1836. Z a v a l a became the first vice-president of the n e w
republic.
By that time the inhabitants of the Southwest were already calling
themselves T e x a n s , Californios, and N u e v o m e x i c a n o s , recognizing t h a t -
as in Latin A m e r i c a - different socio-geographic areas had developed
differently from a cultural point of v i e w . Rivalries between T e x a s and
neighboring M e x i c a n territories were frequent. T h i s is reflected in the
play L o s téjanos [The T e x a n s ] , an a n o n y m o u s N e w M e x i c a n folk drama
written soon after 1 8 4 1 . In that year a T e x a n expedition, under the
561
CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF LATIN AMERICAN LITERATURE
leadership of General H u g h M c L e o d , tried to e x p a n d their territory into

N e w M e x i c o , but w a s defeated by General M a n u e l A r m i j o . T h e manus-
cript of the play w a s found by Professor A u r e l i o M . Espinosa, in 1 9 3 1 , in
the N e w M e x i c a n t o w n of C h i m a y ó . Since the front page w a s missing
Espinosa gave it the title of Los téjanos, and translated it. O f the four
characters in the play, M c L e o d is the only N o r t h A m e r i c a n ; the others are
N a v a r r o ( M c L e o d ' s lieutenant), the N e w M e x i c a n D o n Jorge, and an
Indian from Pecos. A c c o r d i n g to Espinosa, the Indian is " a dramatic
character w o r t h y of the play of a m a s t e r . . . [He] is so well defined and the
story he tells is on the w h o l e so true, h o w e v e r , that w e can not dismiss him
summarily from the historical scene" ("The Texans," 301). T h e Indian is
presented as a talented fellow, capable of deceiving N a v a r r o and General
M c L e o d and leading them into a trap, where they are made prisoners by
D o n Jorge. T h e rivalry between the Republic of T e x a s and N e w M e x i c o ,
still a part of M e x i c o w h e n the play w a s written, is the central theme of
this short play.
M e x i c o w a s not able to defend the rest of its northern territories, w h i c h
were lost as a result of the M e x i c a n A m e r i c a n W a r (1846-1848).
A c c o r d i n g to the T r e a t y of G u a d a l u p e H i d a l g o , M e x i c a n s in the " c e d e d "
territories could remain in their lands and become full A m e r i c a n citizens
or g o south to M e x i c o . M o s t of them decided to stay, thus creating an
ethnic g r o u p w h o s e writings mark the beginning of C h i c a n o literature.
D u e to their isolation from M e x i c o , they soon began to lose touch w i t h
their traditional culture, and especially with the language of their
ancestors, since instruction in the schools w a s in English. T h e r e w e r e , of
course, conflicts between the t w o cultures n o w present in the area, a fact
that is reflected in the verses of the N e w M e x i c a n Jesús M a r i a A l a r i d , w h o
w r o t e in 1889:
Hermoso idioma español
¿que te quieren proscribir?
Y o creo que no hay razón
que tú dejes de existir
(A. F. Arellano, Los pobladores
nuevo mexicanos y su poesía, 37)
[Beautiful Spanish language
do they want to banish you?
There is, of course, no reason,
W h y you should not exist]
H e ended the p o e m - while discussing the situation of M e x i c a n teachers -

with one of the first documented calls for bilingualism:
pues es de gran interés

que el inglés y el castellano
562
Chicano literature
ambos reinen a la vez
en el suelo americano.
(Arellano, 37)
[because it is of great interest
that both English and Spanish
prevail one next to the other
in the American homeland.]
Literature written in English did not appear until the second generation
of M e x i c a n A m e r i c a n s . Writers from this generation, in general, had been
educated in universities outside the Southwest. T h e influential O t e r o
family could be an e x a m p l e of this. M i g u e l A n t o n i o O t e r o (1829-1882)
w a s a professor of classical languages at Fishkill College on the H u d s o n
from 1847 to 1849. His son, M i g u e l A n t o n i o O t e r o (1859-1944), during
his late years w r o t e and published his memoirs, t w o volumes under the
title My Life on the Frontier (1935, 1939), and a third entitled My Nine
Years as Governor of the Territory of New Mexico, 1897-1906 (1940). In
the first v o l u m e of the trilogy the presence of folk heroes predominates.
T h e r e w e find interesting accounts of Buffalo Bill, W i l d Bill H i c o c k , and
Billy the K i d . T o the latter, O t e r o dedicated an entire b o o k , The Real Billy
the Kid (1936). In spite of O t e r o ' s claim that he confines himself to actual
happenings in all of his b o o k s , some of the events he narrates are often
embellished by his imagination. In any case, although he w a s not an
intellectual but rather a political leader, O t e r o w a s able to write an
autobiography w h i c h is a w o r t h y contribution to the early M e x i c a n
A m e r i c a n literature written in English. His trilogy remains one of the
most important sources of information about life in the Southwest during
a critical period: that of the so-called W i l d W e s t , w h e n the territories
acquired from M e x i c o were being transformed into rich agricultural
states.
In California, M a r i a A m p a r o R u i z de Burton (1832-1895) published
The Squatter and the Don: A Novel Descriptive of Contemporary
Occurrences in California (1885) under the p s e u d o n y m C . L o y a l . It is a
most interesting narration of the struggle for survival of a Californio
family (the Alamares) after the occupation of their land by squatters. In
spite of its being centered on the plot of an almost impossible love between
the son of "the Squatter" and the daughter of "the D o n " of the title,
Burton's novel represents an early e x a m p l e of protest literature. N u m e r
ous digressions of the main plot deal w i t h the injustices of the legal system
of California at that time, the dangerous stereotyping of " S p a n o -
A m e r i c a n s " (as the narrator chooses to call the A l a m a r e s ) , the brutal
economic transformation of the state that ended the prosperity of wealthy
Californios, and a number of other issues of interest for the study of
interethnic relationships. Highly self-reflective, Burton's novel also
563
includes numerous metaliterary digressions that provide a guide for its

readers. It is only by paying careful attention to these passages that the
meaning of the novel can be fully grasped.
A m o n g the intellectuals of the period w h o continued to write in
Spanish, w e could mention the f o l l o w i n g , all of them from N e w M e x i c o :
Eusebio C h a c ó n (i870-1948), the author of an unpublished history of the
discovery and conquest of N e w M e x i c o , and of the novels El hijo de la
tempestad and Tras la tormenta la calma (both published in 1892);
M a n u e l C . de Baca ( 1 8 5 3 - 1 9 1 5 ) , author of the novel Vicente Silva y sus
cuarenta bandidos (1896); the poet and novelist M a n u e l M . Salazar
(1854-1900), author of the novel La historia de un caminante, o sea
Gervacio y Aurora (1881), as well as of t w o unpublished collections of
poetry; and Felipe M a x i m i l i a n o C h a c ó n (1873-?), author of the novella
Eustacio y Carlota (n.d.).
By the end of the century, M e x i c a n culture w a s receding in the
Southwest; and so w a s the public use of Spanish. H o w e v e r , the events of
the first t w o decades of the twentieth century came to reverse the course of
history. T h e M e x i c a n R e v o l u t i o n of 1 9 1 0 - 1 9 2 0 , the agricultural and
industrial expansion of the Southwest by those dates, and the w a r efforts
during the First W o r l d W a r resulted in a massive immigration from
M e x i c o . T h i s e x o d u s brought not only the much-needed farm-hands and
industrial w o r k e r s , but also new b l o o d to the M e x i c a n c o m m u n i t y as well
as a revitalization of the culture of the barrios. In the field of literature, the
influence of M e x i c a n writers such as R i c a r d o Flores M a g ó n (1873-1922),
José V a s c o n c e l o s (1882-1959), M a r t í n Luis G u z m á n ( 1 8 7 7 - 1 9 7 6 ) , M a r
iano A z u e l a (1873-1952), and other exiled Revolutionaries gave impetus
to the rebirth of the Spanish language. Some of these writers founded
newspapers and editorial houses. T h e most influential newspapers were
those o w n e d by the L o z a n o family, w h o founded La Prensa in San
A n t o n i o , T e x a s , in 1 9 1 3 , and La Opinión in L o s Angeles, California, in
1926. T h e many literary contributions to these and other newspapers
constituted a veritable outburst of literary activity a m o n g M e x i c a n
Americans. Unfortunately, this period has not been sufficiently d o c u
mented, primarily due to the lack of accessible materials. T h e r e are,
nonetheless, a number of recent publications that give us access to some of
the most influential newspapers of the time. In 1976, A n s e l m o A r e l l a n o
reprinted a collection of p o e m s that had appeared in N e w M e x i c o ' s
Spanish-language newspapers from 1889 to 1959 w i t h the title Los
pobladores nuevo mexicanos y su poesía, 1889-195% in 1982, Juan
R o d r í g u e z edited a collection of satirical sketches by Julio G . A r c e ("Jorge
U l i c a " , 1870—?), Crónicas diabólicas, first published in periodicals of the
San Francisco bay area between 1 9 1 6 and 1926. Finally, in 1984, N i c o l á s
Kanellos edited the novel Las aventuras de don Chipote o: cuando los
564
Chicano literature
pericos mamen by Daniel V e n e g a s (?), a satirical piece first published by

the newspaper El Heraldo de Mexico (Los Angeles, California) in 1928. A s
noted in the introduction by its editor, this is one of the first w o r k s in
w h i c h the narrator adopts an unmistakable working-class perspective,
thus anticipating w h a t will become a popular attitude a m o n g contempor
ary C h i c a n o authors. In spite of these publications, there are still many
other authors w h o s e texts have not been made available to a wider
readership.
T h e period that spans from the early 1930s - w h e n thousands of
M e x i c a n s were deported f o l l o w i n g the G r e a t Depression - until 1945 is
characterized by the preference that C h i c a n o writers gave, once again, to
English. T y p i c a l of this trend w a s the poetry and prose of Fray A n g e l i c o
C h a v e z (b. 1910), in w h i c h religious themes predominate. His most
important collections of p o e m s are Clothed With the Sun (1939) and
Eleven Lady Lyrics and Other Poems (1945). A m o n g his prose narratives,
w o r t h y of mention are the short stories New Mexico Triptych (1940), and
the historical novella La Conquistador a (1949), in w h i c h the narrator is a
sculpture of the V i r g i n M a r y brought to N e w M e x i c o by the first Spanish
settlers.
A n o t h e r important author of this period w a s M a r i a Cristina M e n a
(1892-?). She signed her w o r k s as C h a m b e r s , the name of her husband
(Henry Kellet C h a m b e r s ) , a dramatic author and journalist w h o w a s
editor of the Literary Digest from 1920 to 1935. M a r i a Cristina w r o t e a
series of five novels, most of them set in M e x i c o , as w e r e also her
numerous stories published in the Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine,
the American Magazine, and Cosmopolitan. Her purpose seems to have
been to acquaint the y o u n g A n g l o - A m e r i c a n reader w i t h M e x i c a n culture.
T w o of her most successful novels were The Water-Carrier's Secrets
(1942), and The Bullfighter's Son (1944).
A l s o set in M e x i c o were most of the w o r k s by Josephina Niggli (b.
1911) w h o , like M e n a , w a s born in M e x i c o . She later came to San
A n t o n i o , T e x a s , where she studied at the College of the Incarnate W o r d ,
and soon published her first b o o k of p o e m s , Mexican Silhouettes (1931).
Desiring to continue her studies, she w e n t to C h a p e l Hill to study drama at
the University of N o r t h C a r o l i n a . In 1938 she published Mexican Folk
Plays, in 1945 her first novel, Mexican Village, and in 1947 a second one,
Step Down, Big Brother, all of them having a M e x i c a n b a c k g r o u n d .
D r a w i n g on her experience as a p l a y w r i g h t and teacher of drama, she gave
advice to aspiring dramatists in her b o o k Pointers on Playwriting (1945).
T o w a r d the end of the 1940s M a r i o Suarez (b. 1925) w r o t e several short
stories, published in the Arizona Quarterly, in w h i c h he portrays the
people of the barrios in T u c s o n , A r i z o n a . H a v i n g an excellent under
standing of the p s y c h o l o g y of the C h i c a n o / M e x i c a n o people, he w a s able
565
to create memorable characters like Señor G a r z a , for w h o m one of his

best-known stories is named. "Señor G a r z a " (1947), deals with a barber
w h o s e personality is revealed through his conversations w i t h barrio
people w h o visit his shop. A l t h o u g h he w r o t e in English, Suárez f o l l o w e d
the tradition of the M e x i c a n writers w h o published in the Spanish-
language newspapers of the largest cities in the Southwest. In particular,
his stories are related to their crónicas dominicales, h u m o r o u s narrative
sketches in w h i c h all social classes were satirized. T h e main difference
between Suárez and the Sunday cronistas is to be found in the attitude of
the narrator t o w a r d the C h i c a n o s . W h i l e earlier satirists, like the afore-
mentioned Jorge Ulica, present the C h i c a n o s in an unfavorable light,
criticizing the w a y they speak Spanish and other traits that differentiate
them from M e x i c a n nationals, Suárez - having been born in A r i z o n a -
presents his C h i c a n o characters favorably. C h i c a n o s in Suárez's stories
are not ashamed of their origin, many reject A m e r i c a n i z a t i o n , and they
are not uprooted, since they consider the Southwest - and not M e x i c o - to
be the h o m e of their ancestors.
T h e stories written by Suárez, w h i c h have not been collected, represent
a transition between the early cronistas and such writers of the 1970s as
R o l a n d o R. Hinojosa-Smith (b. 1929). In that transition, the names of a
few other writers should also be mentioned. In particular, Fabiola C a b e z a
de V a c a (1898-1990) and Sabine R. Ulibarri (b. 1919) - both from N e w
M e x i c o - distinguish themselves in their attempts to portray the fast-
disappearing w a y of life that they came to k n o w as children and
adolescents. Fabiola C a b e z a de V a c a is the author of We Fed Them
Cactus (1954), w h i c h is an account of life in the N e w M e x i c a n llano, with
a high dose of autobiography interspersed. Ulibarri, on the other hand, is
best k n o w n for several collections of short stories, most of them set in his
native Tierra A m a r i l l a county. Closer to costumbrismo, his stories are
usually retrospective narratives that depict the customs, w a y s , and
folklore of the people of northern N e w M e x i c o . A m o n g his many b o o k s ,
mention could be made of Tierra Amarilla: cuentos de Nuevo México/
Tierra amarilla: Stories of New Mexico (1964), Mi abuela fumaba puros/
My Grandma Smoked Cigars (1977), Primeros encuentros/First
Encounters (1982), and the most recent El cóndor and Other Stories
(1990). Ulibarri, furthermore, is the only one in this g r o u p that writes in
Spanish. M o s t authors, during the decade of the 1950s and in the early
1960s, continued using English in their writings.
T w o major w o r k s that stand out during this period, announcing w h a t
will shortly become a n e w consciousness a m o n g C h i c a n o writers and
scholars, are the seminal study, With His Pistol in His Hand (1958), by
A m e r i c o Paredes (b. 1 9 1 5 ) , and the novel Pocho (1959), by José A n t o n i o
Villarreal (b. 1924). In his b o o k , Paredes reconstructs the legends that the
566
Chicano literature
people of the border have created about G r e g o r i o C o r t e z . C o r t e z became

a folk hero of the l o w e r R i o G r a n d e Valley in T e x a s w h e n , in 1901, he
singlehandedly defied the T e x a s Rangers. Paredes then compares those
legends w i t h the biography of C o r t e z and, finally, he makes a thorough
study of the several variants of the corrido written to celebrate G r e g o r i o ' s
daring adventure. Corridos, one of the most important forms of the oral
tradition in the Southwest and M e x i c o , are a particular type of ballad that
celebrates local heroes, historical events of importance for the c o m m u n -
ity, and the like. In analyzing this particular corrido, Paredes presents a
theory regarding the origin of the Border ballads, contending that they are
the product of the cultural conflicts that resulted after T e x a s - then N u e v o
Santander - w a s taken over by the A n g l o - A m e r i c a n settlers. N o less
important is the fact that his b o o k is the first from a M e x i c a n A m e r i c a n
scholar to document the life of a C h i c a n o . It has served as a model for
many other writers and students of C h i c a n o culture.
Villarreal's novel, Pocho, is often considered the first modern C h i c a n o
novel. It is a w o r k made significant by the nature of its hero, Richard, w h o
finds himself torn between t w o cultures: that of his father - a M e x i c a n
revolutionary follower of Francisco Villa, w h o finds refuge in the United
States after the defeat of the villistas - and that of his friends in the United
States. O f similar importance in the novel is the description of internal
conflicts in Richard's family as the n e w values its members learn in the
United States challenge those that they brought from M e x i c o . T h e
rebellious attitude of Richard's sister t o w a r d their subservient role is
indicative of this process of cultural change.
T h e publication of Pocho by D o u b l e d a y also represents the starting
point of the first serious attempt to launch commercially the literature
written by C h i c a n o s in the United States. Soon after, in 1963, G r o v e
published the very successful City of Night, by John R e c h y (b. 1934),
followed by Numbers (1968), This Day's Death (1969), Rushes (1972),
and The Vampires (1972), all by the same author. In spite of R e c h y ' s
undeniable artistry, the fact that he did not emphasize his characters'
ethnicity but rather their u n o r t h o d o x - in the context of C h i c a n o culture
of the time - sexual preference, p r o v o k e d a silence a m o n g C h i c a n o critics
that has still to be fully broken. In addition to those titles mentioned,
Rechy has also published The Fourth Angel, Bodies and Souls, Marilyn's
Daughter, and The Miraculous Day of Amalia Gómez. A l s o in the 1960s,
G r o v e published the first t w o w o r k s by Floyd Salas (b. 1931): Tattoo the
Wicked Cross (1967), and What Now, My Love (1969). In 1970, D o u b l e -
day published Chicano, the best-known of the three novels by Richard
V á s q u e z (b. 1928); and in 1974, the same press produced Villarreal's
second novel: The Fifth Horseman (1974). T h a t , and Bantam's issuing of
Macho! (1973) by E d m u n d o Villaseñor (b. 1940), culminate this w a v e of
567
C h i c a n o b o o k s in mainstream presses. W i t h the exception of Pocho and

City of Night, most of these w o r k s have not resisted the passage of time, as
many have seen them flawed by a quasi-stereotypical portrayal of
C h i c a n o s , and as they failed to consolidate an impulse t o w a r d self-
representation and cultural control, w h i c h several newly created presses
attempted from the early 1970s.
If the action of Pocho ended during the early 1940s, w h e n the melting-
pot model for understanding ethnic relations w a s very much in vogue,
twenty years later, as a result of the Civil Rights movement, student
protests, efforts on the part of Cesar C h a v e z to organize the campesinos,
and for other reasons, C h i c a n o s for the first time in their history were able
to unite under the banner of " L a c a u s a , " a powerful nationalistic
movement w h i c h w a s noticeable in all regions of the United States. A s a
result of this n e w social consciousness, a new type of literature emerged,
animated by a rebellious spirit. Characteristic of this n e w writing w a s the
search for native roots in the Indian past of M e x i c o , as well as the use of
both English and Spanish in the same w o r k , often in a same sentence, thus
creating a literary discourse that w o u l d reflect the speech patterns of the
C h i c a n o population.
T h i s period, usually referred to as the " C h i c a n o Renaissance" or the
"Florecimiento [Flowering] C h i c a n o , " has a more or less precise starting
point in 1965 w h e n Luis V a l d e z (b. 1940), in his efforts to help C h a v e z and
the farmworkers, organized the T e a t r o C a m p e s i n o and staged short plays
w h i c h he called adds. T h e s e plays were presented in the open fields, where
the campesinos w o r k e d , often in the midst of a huelga [strike]. His topics
were first inspired by the problems faced by the farmworkers; later he
began to make use of historical subject matter, such as the conquest of
M e x i c o by the Spaniards, in order to s h o w the farmworkers the necessity
to organize in order to present a united front. In all cases, the actos sought
to inspire the audience t o w a r d social action by raising consciousness and
explaining certain abuses on stage. T h e i r aesthetics, a l w a y s inspired by
C h i c a n o popular culture, also b o r r o w e d freely from commedia delVarte,
agitprop theatre, teatro de carpa y variedades, as well as many other
sources. T w o of the most successful actos were " L o s v e n d i d o s " (1967) and
" S o l d a d o r a z o " (sic) (1971). T h e first is a satire of the C h i c a n o s w h o live in
the city and sell their brothers for the benefit of their employers; in the
second play a y o u n g C h i c a n o , urged by his father's extreme form of
machismo, gives his life in V i e t n a m for a worthless cause. Inspired by the
success of the T e a t r o C a m p e s i n o , numerous other theatre groups
appeared. T h e most important of them w a s the T e a t r o de la Esperanza,
organized by critic and director Jorge Huerta in 1 9 7 1 . O n e of its most
notable plays has been " L a v i c t i m a , " w h i c h deals with the devastating
effects of the economic depression of the 1930s upon the C h i c a n o /
568
Chicano literature
M e x i c a n o communities. T h o u s a n d s of people were deported to M e x i c o ,
sometimes separating families, as depicted in the play. In that same year of
1 9 7 1 , all C h i c a n o theatrical groups united and organized T E N A Z (Teatro
N a t i o n a l de A z t l a n ) , a national organization that coordinated their
activities and organized many successful annual festivals, one of them in
M e x i c o City. M o s t companies (including the T e a t r o C a m p e s i n o and the
T e a t r o de la Esperanza) emphasized collective creation of their plays. In
fact, C h i c a n o playwrights have been relatively scarce until recently,
although the f o l l o w i n g could still be mentioned: Nephtali de L e o n (b.
1945) {five Plays, 1972), Fausto A v e n d a n o (b. 1941) {El corrido de
California, 1979), A l f o n s o C . Hernandez (b. 1938) (The False Advent of
Mary's Child, 1979), C a r l o s M o r t o n (b. 1942) (The Many Deaths of
Danny Rosales, 1983), Estela Portillo T r a m b l e y (b. 1936) (Sor Juana and
Other Plays, 1983), Cherrie M o r a g a (b. 1952) (Giving Up the Ghost,
1986), and others w h o have published their plays in several collective
anthologies or in journals.
T h e late 1960s also witnessed the foundation of many journals and
periodicals that w o u l d devote themselves to p r o m o t i n g and disseminating
C h i c a n o literature and thought. T h r e e of the earliest, El Grito ( 1 9 6 7 -
1974), Con Safos (1968-1972), and Aztlan (launched in 1970), provided a
much-needed forum for creative writing, as well as for social and political
analysis of contemporary realities. O f the three, only Aztlan is still being
published (after a silence of several years), and has been joined by the
Americas Review (formerly Revista Chicano-Riquena, 1973), The Bil
a n
ingual Review/La Revista Bilingue (1974), d countless others, a m o n g
them the disappeared De Colores (1973), Mango (1976), Maize (1977),
and La Palabra (1979, w h i c h devoted itself to literature in Spanish). Y e t ,
by far, the most influential editorial movement of the time w a s the
establishment of the Q u i n t o Sol literary prizes, a w a r d e d by the press of the
same name. In a promotional effort, at times reminiscent of the Latin
A m e r i c a n Boom, the prize led to the discovery and consolidation of four
important writers: T o m a s Rivera (1935-1984), R u d o l f o A n a y a (b. 1937),
R o l a n d o Hinojosa-Smith, and Estela Portillo T r a m b l e y . Q u i n t o Sol,
w h i c h w a s the publisher of the journal El Grito, and of the early anthology
El Espejo/The Mirror (1969), had a clearly defined agenda that included
the desire to eradicate stereotypes, the need to p r o m o t e bilingual publica
tions, and the necessity of having the publication of C h i c a n o b o o k s
controlled by C h i c a n o s .
T o m a s Rivera's most important w o r k is his n o v e l " . . .y no se lo trago la
tierra"/". . .and the Earth Did not Part" (1971), the first recipient of the
Q u i n t o Sol Prize (in 1970). In a sequence of twelve episodes - preceded by
a short prose, " E l ano p e r d i d o " ["The Lost Y e a r " ] , and followed by a
final chapter, " D e b a j o de la c a s a " ["Under the H o u s e " ] - the novel
569
depicts life a m o n g migrant C h i c a n o w o r k e r s from T e x a s as seen through

the eyes of a y o u n g boy. Each one of the twelve episodes is introduced by a
short vignette w h o s e purpose is to set the tone of the anecdotes; in the
prose at the end of the novel the y o u n g narrator, under a house,
recapitulates the events that t o o k place during the "lost y e a r " w i t h w h i c h
the novel opens, thus uniting the twelve episodes that m a k e up the core of
the w o r k . Tierra has been praised for its innovative narrative technique,
for its terse style, and for the true-to-life description of the hardships and
tribulations of the migrant w o r k e r s . Rivera is also the author of a
collection of verse, Always and Other Poems (1973), as well as of several
essays dealing w i t h C h i c a n o literature and culture. Recently, Julián
Olivares has edited Tomás Rivera: The Complete Works (1992), w h i c h
reunites all of Rivera's previously published w o r k s w i t h some unpub
lished texts.
T h e second Q u i n t o Sol Prize w a s a w a r d e d , in 1 9 7 1 , to R u d o l f o A n a y a
for Bless Me, Ultima, w h i c h , unlike Tierra - written in Spanish and
published w i t h an English translation by Herminio R í o s C . in collabor
ation w i t h the author - w a s a novel written in English w h i c h has not
been translated into Spanish, in spite of its tremendous success. T h e w o r k
deals w i t h life in a northern N e w M e x i c o rural area. A s in Rivera's novel,
the action in Ultima is told as experienced by a y o u n g b o y , A n t o n i o
M á r e z , w h o is influenced by Ultima's beliefs about life and the superna
tural. A s a curandera [ w o m a n healer], Ultima has the necessary w i s d o m
to help A n t o n i o mature. T h e novel ends w i t h her death, but by that time
A n t o n i o has been able to absorb her w i s d o m . T h i s central narrative
thread is given depth by placing it in the context of the M á r e z family, as
well as of A n t o n i o ' s relations w i t h the youth of the c o m m u n i t y and its
rural environment. In its tone Ultima is not t o o far removed from the
magical realism of such Latin A m e r i c a n writers as Gabriel G a r c i a
M á r q u e z (b. 1928) and Isabel Allende (b. 1942), also sharing w i t h several
Latin A m e r i c a n authors a perception of landscape - Southwestern
landscape, in this case - as a key to the primeval A m e r i c a n w o r l d . O t h e r
fiction w o r k s by A n a y a , all w i t h a N e w M e x i c a n b a c k g r o u n d , are the
novels Heart of Aztlán (1976) and Tortuga (1979), and the collection of
short stories The Silence of the Llano (1982). Some of his most recent
b o o k s , h o w e v e r , d o not deal w i t h N e w M e x i c o but w i t h legendary
M e x i c a n topics, as The Legend of La Llorona (1984) and Lord of the
Dawn (1987). H e is also the author of a poetry c h a p b o o k The Adventures
of Juan Chicaspatas (1984) and of a travel account entitled A Chicano in
China (1986).
T h e third winner of the Q u i n t o Sol Prize, R o l a n d o Hinojosa-Smith, is
the author of Klail City Death Trip, a series of twelve volumes depicting
the daily life and adventures of people living in the fictitious Belken
570
Chicano literature
C o u n t y , supposedly located in the l o w e r R i o grande Valley area. T h e first

of these novels, Estampas del Valle y otras obras/Sketches of the Valley
and Other Works, winner of the Q u i n t o Sol Prize in 1972, w a s published
the f o l l o w i n g year in a bilingual edition. It w a s later "re-created" in
English by the author - in w h a t will become a norm for all of his w o r k s
originally written in Spanish - and published under the title The Valley
(1983). T h i s first novel set the tone for the w h o l e series, w h i c h is still in
progress. T h e second b o o k , Klail City y sus alrededores appeared in
H a v a n a , C u b a , in 1976 as the recipient of the C a s a de las A m e r i c a s Prize; it
w a s the first occasion on w h i c h that prize w a s a w a r d e d to a citizen of the
United States. T h e n f o l l o w e d a b o o k of narrative poetry, Korean Love
Songs (1980), and a series of b o o k s that experiment w i t h different genres
in an attempt to explore diverse perspectives in the portrayal of a C h i c a n o
community. T h i s generic experimentation also amounts to an encyclope
dic attempt to portray the rich heritage that a C h i c a n o author can claim,
since the genres used include those most typical of the M e x i c a n / H i s p a n i c
tradition, as well as those associated w i t h United States popular culture
(including some inspired by television). T h e rest of the volumes in the
Klail City Death Trip series are Mi querido Rafa (1981) (recreated as Dear
Rafe in 1985), Rites and Witnesses (1982), Partners in Crime; A Rafe
Buenrostro Mystery (1985), Claros Varones de Belken/Fair Gentlemen of
Belken (1986), Los amigos de Becky (1991, recreated in English as Becky's
Friend, w h i c h w a s published in 1990, before the Spanish original
appeared). T h e series has an interesting fragmented structure due to the
fact that it is presented as a collection of diverse materials brought
together by several characters w h o undertake the task of writing the
chronicle of their people by gathering as much information as they can
from all the sources available. T h e resulting open-ended text is then
presented to the reader, w h o must play a very active role in the final
configuration of the w o r k . T o date, none of Hinojosa's b o o k s has been
published by a non-Latino-based press, except for a translation to
G e r m a n of Klail City y sus alrededores. In the w o r d s of one of his critics,
José D . Saldivar, Hinojosa " h a s remained actively committed to the
literary development of an A m e r i c a n ethnopoetics during the past fifteen
years, thus becoming in the eyes of many the foremost exponent of
C h i c a n o literature" (The Rolando Hinojosa Reader, 4 4 ) .
T h e fourth and last Q u i n t o Sol Prize w a s a w a r d e d to Estela Portillo
a
T r a m b l e y for her b o o k Rain of Scorpions and Other Writings (1975),
collection of stories considered as the first major contribution by a
C h i c a n a to contemporary literature. T h e author w a s already well k n o w n
for her play, The Day of the Swallows (1971), in w h i c h she created a
strong character, Josefa, w h o s e desire to keep secret her relationship with
a former prostitute leads to her suicide. In recent years Portillo has written
571
several other plays, a m o n g them one about the life of the famous
seventeenth-century M e x i c a n nun, Sor Juana Inés de la C r u z (included in
her Sor Juana and Other Flays, 1983). She has also published a novel,
Trini (1986), the story of a pregnant M e x i c a n T a r a s c a n w o m a n w h o
crosses the border into the United States in search of a better life for her
offspring. In both the novel and the stories, Portillo T r a m b l e y tries to
combine the depiction of everyday realities w i t h a series of symbols that
project her narratives onto a transcendent level of reality.
T h e disappearance in 1974 of Q u i n t o Sol, split into T o n a t i u h and Justa,
did not lead C h i c a n o literature into a radical change in course as the end of
its pioneering role might have made some fear. T h e fact that other presses
were already publishing at a significant pace, and that others w o u l d
subsequently follow, served to channel the n o w solid flow of texts that
were? being produced. T h u s , the n e w l y created Editorial Peregrinos
published t w o texts that could have easily been a part of the Q u i n t o Sol
p r o g r a m : Peregrinos de Aztlán (1974), by M i g u e l M é n d e z M . (b. 1930),
and El diablo en Texas (1976), by Aristeo Brito (b. 1942). Both novels are
written in Spanish and use a fragmentary technique (as did those by
Rivera and Hinojosa), both adopt a tone of social protest, and they both
reject previous stereotypical representations of C h i c a n o s . T h e y are
situated in the border area between the United States and M e x i c o :
M é n d e z ' s in California and A r i z o n a , and Brito's in the T e x a s area.
Finally, they also share an almost expressionistic tendency to distort
reality by creating degraded w o r l d s . In the case of Brito's novel this is less
evident, but it occurs in passages in w h i c h the devil is the main character,
as well as in others where dead characters get together to talk about their
lives, in a situation reminiscent of Pedro Páramo (1955) by Juan R u l f o
(1918-1986). A s for M é n d e z , his novel is closer to the grotesque tradition
of Valle-Inclán (1866-1936) and, particularly, to that of Luis M a r t i n
Santos (1924—1964). Peregrinos de Aztlán deals w i t h the fate of the Y a q u i
people, w h o were driven from their homeland in northern M e x i c o and
forced to lead a pariah-like life in the border cities or else to w o r k as peons
in the fields of A r i z o n a and California. T h i s novel stands out for its use of
colloquial language in its many dialogues, as well as for a skillful
manipulation of mythical elements to structure the plot. A s opposed to
Brito, w h o has not published any major w o r k s after El diablo en Texas,
M é n d e z is the author of several collections of short stories and novels, as
well as a b o o k of allegorical poetry (Los criaderos humanos: épica de los
desamparados y Sahuaros, 1975). M a n y of his stories are inspired by the
oral tradition of the Southwest, but others have written sources as old as
Calila and Dimna (1251). O n e of his best-known stories is "Tata
C a s e h u a . " T h e story is in line w i t h the neoindigenist trend - w h i c h w e
shall soon discuss in detail. Its protagonist is a Y a q u i Indian, w h o s e life
572.
Chicano literature
and death are monuments to his people's endurance and pride. M o r e

recently, M é n d e z has published a second novel, El sueño de Santa Maria
de las piedras (1986), in Spanish as are all of his writings, T h i s novel is
centered around the memories of a g r o u p of elders w h o get together in the
fictional t o w n of Santa M a r í a de las Piedras to remember h o w things were
and w h o people are. It is greatly influenced by Latin A m e r i c a n M a g i c a l
Realism, although M é n d e z ' s o w n voice - particularly his ability to
recreate an oral culture in monologues and dialogues - is not lost.
A l s o from the mid-1970s are t w o novels that s o m e h o w depart from
w h a t contemporary C h i c a n o literature had been up to that point, and that
announce an imminent expansion of subjects, styles, and voices. W e are
talking about The Road to Tamazunchale (1975), by R o n Arias (b. 1941),
and Caras viejas y vino nuevo (1975) [Old Faces and New Wine], by
Alejandro M o r a l e s (b. 1944). Arias's text is a radical departure from the
previously predominant epistemological obsession s h o w e d by C h i c a n o
authors. T h u s , his novel does not deal w i t h h o w to understand reality, nor
w i t h h o w to reconstruct history from a C h i c a n o point of view or h o w to
create order out of chaos. A r i a s ' s is an ontological novel, in the sense that
Brian M c H a l e describes these in Postmodernist Fiction (1987): thus, w h a t
counts in The Road to Tamazunchale is its main character's ability to
create - and not interpret - a w o r l d or, rather, many different w o r l d s . For
that, A r i a s baptizes his protagonist as Fausto T e j a d a , a name that
immediately recalls t w o of his most illustrious predecessors: Faustus and
D o n Q u i x o t e . Fantasy is of utmost importance for this text that has also
been affiliated with M a g i c a l Realism (although it could as easily be placed
in the context of the United States' Postmodernism). T h e wanderings of
Fausto, usually in the c o m p a n y of M a r i o (a pachuco-like character) or
M a r c e l i n o (a Peruvian sheep-herder w h o suddenly appears on a L o s
Angeles freeway w i t h his alpacas), take him from an anachronistic
colonial Peru to present-day M e x i c o and the United States; not to mention
a number of impossible places in between (like T a m a z u n c h a l e ) , some of
w h i c h belong to different artistic realms (theatre, cinema, and television).
In M o r a l e s ' s case, Caras viejas y vino nuevo is also set in an urban
atmosphere. Y e t , while the novel by A r i a s departs from everyday reality
through fantasy, M o r a l e s presents us barrio life as if seen through a
refracting glass. It is a novel close to tremendismo in its strong themes and
s o m e w h a t imperturbable narrator(s). T h e presentation systematically
distorts reality, be it through a reverse ordering of the plot, through a
pervasive use of animalization and reification, or through a very restric-
tive focalization that reduces people to just parts of their bodies (legs,
breasts, etc). In his f o l l o w i n g novel, La verdad sin voz (1979) [Death of an
Anglo], M o r a l e s makes D r . L o g a n - an A n g l o idealist - the hero and, at
the end, the victim of those w h o resent his helping impoverished C h i c a n o
573
patients. T h e novel has also several subplots, one of them dealing w i t h the
character Profe M o r e n i t o ' s writing of D r . L o g a n ' s story. M o r a l e s ' s third
novel, Reto en el paraiso (1983) represents one of the most ambitious
undertakings in the rewriting of history by C h i c a n o authors. It chronicles
the disenfranchisement of C h i c a n o s in California, and the loss of their
land grants w h i c h began in 1848. T h e historical dimension of the novel is
enriched by the treatment of related topics, such as the problem of identity
- explored mainly in symbolic and psychological terms - or that of the
social relations between A n g l o s and M e x i c a n s . In its development, the
novel is quite c o m p l e x due to its fragmented structure, time displace
ments, and the alternation of English and Spanish. His latest novel, The
Brick People (1988), returns to the setting of Car as viejas y vino nuevo; but
w h a t in the latter w a s apocalyptic, becomes in the former genesis, since
The Brick People chronicles the foundation of the brick factory and the
Utopian t o w n intended for its w o r k e r s , that later in time w o u l d become
the alienated barrio of his first novel. A l l four of M o r a l e s ' s w o r k s are
connected by certain repetitions, be it of characters, of settings, or themes,
but they are not as integrated as to conform a series, such as that by
Hinojosa.
T o close our discussion of narrative prose in the 1970s, w e have
reserved a g r o u p of w o r k s that are on the boundaries between autobiogra
phy and the novel (particularly of the Bildungsroman type). O n e of them,
the autobiography Barrio Boy (1971) by Ernesto G a l a r z a (1905-1984),
contains sufficient novelistic elements to m a k e any classification of the
w o r k problematic. It follows the novelistic pattern wherein the p r o t a g o
nist undertakes a journey from M e x i c o to the United States, either alone
or accompanied by his family (as in this case). T h e initial cultural shock
and the process of assimilation are thoroughly documented. G a l a r z a ' s
depiction of this journey is one of the most vivid, from his recreation of life
in a remote M e x i c a n village to the observation of life in a series of cities
along the w a y .
If G a l a r z a ' s text is a fictionalized autobiography, The Autobiography
of a Brown Buffalo (1972) and The Revolt of the Cockroach People (1973),
by O s c a r Z e t a A c o s t a (1936-?), could be described as autobiographical
novels, since fictionalized elements are pervasively interspersed in them
with others from the author's life. Both texts are also associated w i t h the
journey motif, particularly The Autobiography of a Brown Buffalo, but in
this case through the filter of the Beat generation. T h e first v o l u m e is a trip
(geographically and otherwise) undertaken by its main character in search
of himself, while the second is mainly a very u n o r t h o d o x account of the
early years of the C h i c a n o movement, focusing on its main character's
participation in it. T h e question of the subject and, in particular, of the
subject w h o writes (be it his autobiography or the history of his
574
Chicano literature
community) becomes a major topos for A c o s t a ' s texts, as it did for much
of the C h i c a n o fiction that w e have reviewed; many authors seem to find a
need to account for their o w n c o m i n g to terms w i t h writing. Later
autobiographical w o r k s include Mi lucha por la tierra (1978) by Reies
L o p e z Tijerina (b. 1926), w h i c h chronicles the main events of the author's
involvement with the A l i a n z a Federal de Mercedes, and Hunger of
Memory (1981) by Richard R o d r i g u e z (b. 1944), a better-known text,
probably due to its polemical ideological position vis-a-vis most other
C h i c a n o texts. Written in an often praised style, R o d r i g u e z ' s text
introduced topics and attitudes opposed to those defended by other
writers, such as bilingual education, affirmative action, and the public use
of the Spanish language, all of w h i c h R o d r i g u e z strongly opposes.
T h e poetry of the late 1960s and early 1970s w a s clearly characterized
by a tone of urgency. A militant tone, counterbalanced sometimes by a
desire to recreate collective feelings of pride and brotherhood, w a s the
most easily detectable feature of most poems. T o g e t h e r w i t h an unsur-
passed richness in language (poets used English and Spanish - often in the
same p o e m - incorporating at times calò - pachuco slang - and terms
from pre-Hispanic languages), this poetry stands out for its ability to
address and reach a non-traditional audience. A l t h o u g h many were
published, p o e m s were often conceived for public declamation in
c o m m u n i t y and academic gatherings. In fact, as noted by Cordelia
Candelaria in her Chicano Poetry (1986), many poems of this era are
based upon conventions of oral poetry; thus, marked rhythms, repeti-
tions, clearly demarcated rhymes, and the like, are used to secure an
adequate reception in readings. In fact, some poems, like the w e l l - k n o w n
' T e t a n i a en c a l o " (1976) by José A n t o n i o Burciaga (b, 1940), require a
responsive audience to serve as a chorus in a rosary-like fashion. In others,
such as "Stupid A m e r i c a " by A b e l a r d o D e l g a d o (b. 1931) - one of the
most widely anthologized poems of these times - a parallelistic construc-
tion serves as a base for the variations on the theme of discrimination and
stereotyping.
O n e of the earliest b o o k s of poetry published under the aegis of the
C h i c a n o movement w a s J Am Joaquin (1967), by R o d o l f o " C o r k y "
G o n z a l e s (b. 1928), an epic p o e m about the c o m p l e x identity of the
C h i c a n o s , w h i c h the author traces back to before the conquest of M e x i c o .
Joaquin, the hero of the p o e m , asserts himself as the descendant of both
the last A z t e c emperor ("I A m C u a u h t e m o c , / proud and noble, / leader of
m e n " [p. 16]) and the Spanish conquerors ("I am the s w o r d and flame of
Cortes the d e s p o t " [p. 16]). Joaquin, w h o also identifies w i t h M e x i c a n
popular heroes (Juarez, Villa, Z a p a t a , Murrieta), becomes a sort of
C h i c a n o everyman, w h o s e identification w i t h M e x i c a n culture w a s
intentionally used by G o n z a l e s in order to instill pride in the rich heritage
575
CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF L A T I N A M E R I C A N LITERATURE
of M e x i c a n A m e r i c a n s . A s a consequence of this b o o k ' s notoriety, the

T e a t r o C a m p e s i n o filmed w i t h great success a version of J Am Joaquin in
1969.
S o m e w h a t in the epic vein of G o n z a l e s ' s p o e m , Ferros y antiperros
(1972) by Sergio Elizondo (b. 1930) resembles J Am Joaquin in its
structure, its tone, and its content. H o w e v e r , there is less use of symbolic
materials (except for the title metaphor of dogs and antidogs), and less
emphasis upon M e x i c a n culture, both pre-Hispanic and revolutionary.
A l s o influenced by the ideology of the C h i c a n o movement is the poetry of
José M o n t o y a (b. 1932), collected under the title El sol y los de abajo
(1972). His most famous p o e m " E l L o u i e " is the elegy of a pachuco and,
although M o n t o y a ' s p o e m is not exempt from ambivalences in the
portrayal of Louie, it has c o m e to emblematize the C h i c a n o positing of
pachucos as cultural heroes of resistance, a trait that - w i t h certain
exceptions - continues to date.
H o w e v e r , where the tracing back of the roots to indigenous cultures
became consolidated as a nationalistic trend of utmost importance w a s in
the so-called neoindigenist literature of the late i96os/early 1970s. T h e
poet Alurista (Alberto Baltazar Urista, [b. 1947]), from the beginning of
his poetic career, and the p l a y w r i g h t Luis V a l d e z , w h e n he and the T e a t r o
C a m p e s i n o turned from actos to mitos, became the leaders of this trend.
T h e mitos are plays in w h i c h mythical and legendary elements - taken
mostly from A z t e c and M a y a sources - are essential to the development of
the plot. Often, V a l d e z combined both the acto and the mito in the same
play, but not a l w a y s successfully. T h e best example of this combination is
La gran carpa de los Rasquachi (1973), his first full-length play, in w h i c h
an acto deals w i t h the life of Jesús Pelado R a s q u a c h i , a M e x i c a n national
w h o has brought his family to the United States in search of the promised
land, only to find discrimination and misery. W i t h this social theme
V a l d e z intermingled t w o mitos, in w h i c h he introduces characters from
both Christian and pre-Hispanic religions. T h e resolution of the play is
brought about by a miracle, by w h i c h the Virgin M a r y saves the hero from
the Devil. In 1 9 7 7 , in the version presented on television under the title
Corrido, the t w o mitos were eliminated. A n o t h e r mito by V a l d e z , w h i c h
has been staged successfully, is Bernabé (1970), a play in w h i c h the village
idiot (Bernabé) is in love w i t h M o t h e r Earth, the provider of food and life.
T h e presence of pre-Hispanic gods and allegorical characters (the Sun, the
M o o n , the Earth) are in this play better adapted to the central theme than
in other mitos. O n e of the allegorical figures, the M o o n , appears as a
pachuco, a character later made popular by V a l d e z in his play and film,
Zoot Suit (1978). W h i l e gaining him national recognition, Zoot Suit
elicited some controversy about V a l d e z ' s m o v e from grassroot circles to
B r o a d w a y and, later, H o l l y w o o d (with his acclaimed film La Bamba,
about the C h i c a n o rock star Ritchie Valens).
576
Chicano literature
A s for Alurista, he is credited as the first to use consistently a blending of
English and Spanish in contemporary poetry. H e is also credited w i t h
authorship of " E l Plan Espiritual de A z t l à n " ["The Spiritual Plan of
A z t l à n " ] , a manifesto that put forward the notion of A z t l à n as the
C h i c a n o homeland, a very successful unifying metaphor for C h i c a n o s that
- although not completely free from controversy - p r o m o t e d a sense of
ethnic pride in the indigenous ancestors while reinvigorating the idea of
the Southwest as " o c c u p i e d A m e r i c a " (a notion fully explored in the
history b o o k of that title by R o d o l f o A c u n a , 1972). O f course, for this
nationalistic stance the new language created out of the fusion of English
and Spanish represented a sort of national language that conveyed, better
than any other linguistic option, the cultural mestizaje that had produced
contemporary C h i c a n o s . Poets like José M o n t o y a , Juan Felipe Herrera (b.
1948), Luis O m a r Salinas (b. 1937), A n g e l a de H o y o s (b. 1940), T i n o
Villanueva (b. 1941), R i c a r d o Sanchez (b. 1941), and Bernice Z a m o r a (b.
1938) have perfected this style, but Alurista's poetry is probably the best
example of h o w the combination of the t w o languages can result in the
creation of original and effective poems. A t the same time, his poetry
represents, better than any other, the close relationship between literature
and the social m o v e m e n t k n o w n as " L a C a u s a . " A l t h o u g h he began to
publish p o e m s while he w a s still a university student in San D i e g o ,
California, it w a s not until 1971 that he became well k n o w n w i t h his
collection Floricanto en Aztlàn, a b o o k that marks a high point in the
renaissance of C h i c a n o poetry. In it, he created a C h i c a n o w o r l d w h i c h
combines imagery from pre-Hispanic M e x i c o , the M e x i c a n R e v o l u t i o n of
1 9 1 0 - 1 9 2 0 , and contemporary barrio life. T h i s trend w a s continued in his
second b o o k , Nationchild Plumaroja (1972), in w h i c h the values of
indigenous A m e r i c a have a prominent place. Alurista's poetry had a
major impact on the social and political changes that t o o k place a m o n g
C h i c a n o s during the late 1960s and early 1970s. O t h e r w o r k s by Alurista
include Return: Poems Collected and New (1982), where the autobiogra
phical element becomes, for the first time, significantly noticeable; Spik in
Glyph? (1981), his most daring experiment w i t h language thus far, and
A'nque (1979), where prose and poetry are combined. H e has also
published an allegorical play, Dawn (1974).
T h e second half of the 1970s brings many important changes to
C h i c a n o poetry that extend themselves into the 1980s; a m o n g them, an
interiorization of poetics and a preference for individual over collective
concerns. T o g e t h e r with an emphasis on personal styles, these poets seem
to be prone to stressing in their w o r k s the differences in the many C h i c a n o
communities rather than the c o m m u n a l essences previously sought by
others. T h u s , class and gender variations begin to surface in their w o r k s ,
as d o different conceptions of poetry. English seems to be preferred,
overall, to Spanish, but bilingualism continues to be a c o m m o n option. It
577
w a s during this period also that w o m e n writers, for the first time in large
numbers, began publishing extensively and, most importantly, set out to
create their o w n publishing outlets and literary circuits. For the first time
also, literary w o r k s began to be produced by C h i c a n o writers from the
large urban areas of the M i d w e s t , particularly C h i c a g o .
A n earlier figure, T i n o Villanueva, could be exemplary of the transition
from the committed poetry of the 1960s and early 1970s to that of the mid-
1970s. In his first w o r k (Hay otra voz: Poems 1968-1971,1972), he already
alternated between a socially oriented poetry, and a more personal
impulse t o w a r d metaphysics, something occasionally seen also in the
poetry of A n g e l a de H o y o s . Villanueva's second b o o k , Shaking Off the
Dark (1984) > resolves this duality by reconfiguring the individual in a
collectivity that w o u l d not negate his o w n potentiality to both belong and
be different. T h i s collectivity is not just the C h i c a n o community or the
family recreated in p o e m s such as those in the section " H i s t o r y I must
W a k e T o " (from Shaking Off the Dark), but also the community of
writers w h o populate his poems and w h o s e voices Villanueva recalls -
sometimes through imitation, sometimes through intertextual allusions.
Jorge Guillen (1893-1984), César Vallejo (1892-1938) (quite influential
also for A n g e l a de H o y o s and other C h i c a n o poets), A n n e Sexton ( 1 9 2 8 -
1974), Pablo N e r u d a (1904-1973), W i l l i a m C a r l o s W i l l i a m s (1883-1963),
and Federico G a r c í a L o r c a (1899-1936) are a m o n g the easily detectable
presences in Villanueva's intertextual quilt. A similarly strong intertex-
tual framework is found in Villanueva's autobiographical Crónica de mis
años peores (1987), w h o s e title comes from a p o e m by J. M . C a b a l l e r o
Bonald (b> 1926). In this, his latest b o o k , Villanueva insistently deals w i t h
the poles o f language and silence, of past and present, in order to chronicle
his o w n transition from being the inarticulate child of migrant w o r k e r s to
becoming a poet w h o takes control of his o w n history and his o w n w o r d .
H o w e v e r , the poet w h o epitomizes the changes in poetics during the
1970s is G a r y Soto (b. 1952), w h o s e influence and reputation in circles
beyond the C h i c a n o have been continuously increasing. H e is the author
of The Elements of San Joaquin (1977), and several other collections like
The Tale of Sunlight (1978), Where Sparrows Work Hard (1981), Black
Hair (1985), Who Will Know Us? (1990), and Home Course in Religion
(1991). His is an imagistic poetry, centered - in his earlier w o r k s - in the
recollection and observation of his barrio childhood and - lately - in a sort
of metaphysical questioning of life triggered by everyday nimious inci-
dents typical of a middle-class suburban existence. H e has also started a
series of autobiographical recollections in prose that include Living Up the
Street (1985) and Small Faces (1986).
A s is the case w i t h Soto's, the poetry of A l b e r t o R í o s (b. 1952)
(Whispering to Fool the Wind, 1982), Bernice Z a m o r a (Restless Serpents,
578
Chicano literature
1976), and Lorna Dee Cervantes (b. 1954) {Emplumada, 1981) is centered
on the imagistic recreation of reality, the exploration of the poets' o w n
subjectivities, and the attempt to reach a wider and more diversified
readership. T h e last t w o poets mentioned, besides, are in the forefront of a
movement t o w a r d the engendering of the poetic subject that will become
one of the major changes in the literature of the 1980s. T h i s first group of
C h i c a n a poets also includes several w h o choose to write in Spanish,
a m o n g them M a r g a r i t a C o t a - C á r d e n a s (b. 1941) {Noches Despertando
InConciencias, 1977; Marchitas de mayo, 1989), Barbara Brinson-Pineda
(1956, later Brinson-Curiel) {Nocturno, 1979; Speak to Me from Dreams,
1989), L u c h a C o r p i (b. 1945) {Palabras de mediodia/Noon Words, 1980;
Variaciones sobre una tempestad/Variations on a Storm, 1990), G i n a
Valdés {Puentes y fronteras, 1982; Comiendo lumbre/Eating Fire, 1986),
and M i r i a m Bornstein (b. 1950) {Bajo cubierta, 1976). A s suggested by
M a r t a E. Sánchez in her Contemporary Chicana Poetry, it could be said
that all of them seem to find the need to negotiate their identities by
s o m e h o w balancing their roles as C h i c a n a s , w o m e n , and writers. M o s t
are highly conscious in their poems of the novelty of this latest role, and
consistently explore h o w their being writers affects the perceptions that
others have of them.
In most cases, the poetry written by C h i c a n a s is characterized by a fine
irony that subverts traditional attitudes t o w a r d w o m e n ; M a r g a r i t a C o t a -
Cárdenas or M i r i a m Bornstein could be representative of this trait. Some
poets are also at the forefront of an expansion of the language of C h i c a n o
poetry by venturing into the largely sidestepped vocabulary of eroticism
and by a daring reclamation of their bodies and their sexualities; A n a
Castillo (b. 1953) {Otro canto, 1977; The Invitation, 1979; Women Are
Not Roses, 1984; My Father Was a Toltec, 1988), A l m a Villanueva (b.
1944) {Bloodroot, 1977; Mother, May If 1978; Life Span, 1985), and M a r i a
Herrera-Sobek w o u l d probably be the best examples of this uninhibited
poetry that shuns taboos and euphemisms. Some of these poets embark on
a redefinition of terms and historico-mythological figures that radically
re-evaluates traditions and social behavior: T i s b e , Penelope, A r i a d n a ,
Persephone n o w appear in poems by A l m a Villanueva, C o t a - C á r d e n a s or
Brinson telling their stories from a female perspective; the figure of
M a l i n t z i n / M a l i n c h e , in particular, is subject to a systematic revision after
the very influential essay by A d e l a i d a R. del Castillo " M a l i n t z i n T e n é p a l :
A Preliminary L o o k into a N e w Perspective" (1977). She n o w appears not
as the raped mother of the mestizos, as frequently portrayed by M e x i c a n
and C h i c a n o male authors; she is no longer " l a C h i n g a d a " - an object -
but rather a speaking subject w h o takes certain decisions concerning
herself and, most importantly, a mediator - " l a l e n g u a " ["the translator"]
- between cultures, as noted by N o r m a A l a r c ó n in her " T r a d d u t o r a ,
579
T r a d i t o r a : A Paradigmatic Figure of C h i c a n a F e m i n i s m " (1989). It will be

impossible to even list the many essays, p o e m s , and prose w o r k s recently
devoted to this figure, but a m o n g them the reader may consult p o e m s by
L u c h a C o r p i (in Palabras de mediodia), A l m a Villanueva (in Santiago
D a y d i - T o l s o n ' s Five Poets of Aztldn, 1985), and the essays by G l o r i a
Anzaldiia (in BorderlandsI La Frontera, 1987).
Poetry in the 1980s has f o l l o w e d almost as many paths as there have
been poets. A m o n g the most innovative voices, together w i t h those
already mentioned, w e should highlight Juan Felipe Herrera and Fran
cisco X . A l a r c o n (b. 1954). Herrera w a s a major voice in the indigenist
trend of the 1970s but, in the 1980s, he has created a type of experimental
poetry that approaches the visual arts in his Exiles of Desire (1985),
Facegames (1987), and Akrilica (1989), where cinema, graphic design, and
painting become necessary points of reference. A l a r c o n , in turn, is rapidly
becoming one of the most respected poets of the 1980s. H e is particularly
praised for his short poems from Tattoos (1985), that are almost limited to
the development of one single metaphor. In that sense, his poems inscribe
themselves on paper like a tattoo w o u l d in s o m e b o d y ' s flesh. His most
recent Cuerpo en llamas I Body in Flames (1990), combines that type of
p o e m w i t h longer ones in w h i c h the erotic impulse encounters the
political.
In narrative, the abundance and quality of the prose written by Chicanas

has been the most noticeable p h e n o m e n o n during the 1980s. O n e of the
most successful writers is the C h i c a g o a n Sandra Cisneros (b. 1954), w h o s e
The House on Mango Street (1984) w o n her an immediate reputation. In a
sense, The House on Mango Street could be read as an engendered
response to T o m a s Rivera's Tierra, as suggested by several critics. Y e t its
importance goes beyond that point as it gives us a poetic rendering of
social aspects previously almost unheard of in C h i c a n o letters. Cisneros
has found a very personal style by appropriating the voice of a y o u n g
C h i c a n a and f o l l o w i n g it to maturity. W i t h her second prose b o o k
Woman Hollering Creek (1991), Cisneros has also joined a very small
group of C h i c a n o authors — Cecile Pineda (b. 1942), A r t u r o Islas ( 1 9 3 8 -
1991) - that are n o w , once again, penetrating mainstream publication
houses.
A n a Castillo's t w o novels {The Mixquiahuala Letters, 1986, and
Sapogonia, 1990) have also established her as one of the major voices of
the most recent C h i c a n o narrative. The Mixquiahuala Letters is an
epistolary novel, open (a la Cortazar) to a number of possible readings
suggested by the author. It chronicles the travels (physical and imaginary)
of t w o friends, a C h i c a n a and an A n g l o - A m e r i c a n w o m a n , as they embark
upon a search for themselves, the perfect relationship, and a cultural
580
Chicano literature
experience/encounter w i t h M e x i c o - the M o t h e r l a n d . Sapogonia, on the

other hand, is a metaphor for the c o m m o n homeland of all mestizos, a sort
of f o l l o w - u p on the idea of A z t l a n with a less nationalistic connotation,
possibly due to the fact that Castillo grew up in C h i c a g o , a c o m m u n i t y
where Latinos form a heterogeneous group that, to a certain degree,
transcends the barriers of nationality.
M u c h of The Ultraviolet Sky (1988) by A l m a Villanueva, one of several
C h i c a n a poets w h o , recently, have begun to write novels, is devoted to
exploring the painful process of establishing an independent self, free
from the constraints of m o t h e r h o o d and marriage — but also free to choose
w h e n and h o w to give birth to a n e w creature. A n o t h e r case in point
w o u l d be that of L u c h a C o r p i w h o reconstructs in her Delia's Song (1989)
the beginning of the C h i c a n o student protests in the Berkeley area, and the
difficult position of Chicanas in that movement, being sometimes rele
gated to secondary roles. O t h e r prose writers w h o have w o n praise from
most critics are Denise C h a v e z - w h o is also a p l a y w r i g h t - and Helena
M a r i a Viramontes (b. 1954), w h o distinguish themselves for their respect
ive The Last of the Menu Girls (1986), a collection of short stories that
read as a novel of the coming-of-age of their protagonist, and The Moths
and Other Stories (1985), w h i c h constructs a rich gallery of female
characters in a constant struggle for affirmation against social odds as well
as their o w n mistakes.
H o w e v e r , possibly, one of the most novel phenomena taking place in
C h i c a n a literature in the 1980s is the creation of a n e w type of b o o k s that
transcend the barriers of genre to construct deliberately hybrid texts; their
hybridity, in turn, becomes metaphoric of the continuous " b o r d e r
crossings" (as G l o r i a A n z a l d u a w o u l d put it) that contemporary C h i c a n a s
effectuate; in particular, C h i c a n a lesbians. A t least t w o examples could be
cited: those of Cherrie M o r a g a ' s Loving in the War Years (1983), and of
A n z a l d u a ' s Borderlands I La frontera. Both b o o k s , although different from
each other in many w a y s , switch more or less freely from narrative, to
poetry, to essays, to autobiography, in an attempt to engage in the
exploration of self and society from different discursive approaches. In
both cases, furthermore, the generic experimentation a l l o w s for a revindi
cation of the personal as political, and also, is a metaphor for their explicit
lesbian sexual identity. A n z a l d u a and M o r a g a are also the editors of the
most successful This Bridge Called My Back (1981, translated by A n a
Castillo as Esta puente mi espalda and published, subsequently, in Latin
A m e r i c a ) , w h i c h is in the forefront of efforts t o w a r d a w o m e n - o f - c o l o r
feminism, a m o v e m e n t that claims that European and A n g l o - A m e r i c a n
feminism has traditionally neglected the concerns of w o m e n of color, as
well as their cultural differences. It also engages in a critical debate w i t h
Latin A m e r i c a n feminism, since many in the movement feel an important
581
difference in class identification separating them from feminists in Latin

America.
A l t h o u g h the prose fiction of C h i c a n a s has been predominantly an
English-language phenomenon (with the exception of short stories pub
lished in journals), there are at least t w o novels in Spanish that should be
included in an essay like this. T h e first is Puppet (1984) by M a r g a r i t a C o t a -
Cárdenas. It is a p o l y p h o n y of languages, codes, dialects, media dis
courses, and all kinds of voices that converge in that o f Petra L e y v a , the
narrator. She is trying to elucidate the circumstances of a violent death
w h i c h occurred in the community. In the process, she is also reconstruct
ing her o w n personal and cultural history as a C h i c a n a and as a writer.
T h e second text to be mentioned here is Paletitas de Guayaba (1991) by
Erlinda Gonzáles-Berry (b. 1942), w h i c h also reconstructs critically the
political, sexual, and social a w a k e n i n g of its protagonist as she travels
south (to M e x i c o ) in a train. It is written in an ironic style that, at times,
becomes a parody o f institutional discourses. T h e fact that the author has
extensive training in linguistics is clearly noticeable in her ability to
manipulate language to reflect social and regional particularities, as well
as to expose hidden values associated w i t h certain w o r d s and attitudes.
M o s t novels published by C h i c a n o s have also favored English in the
1980s. In English are written even novels like Rainbow's End (1988), by
G e n a r o G o n z á l e z (b. 1949), w h i c h inserts itself in w h a t had been an
almost Spanish-only tradition of satirizing the A m e r i c a n dream; a
tradition that starts w i t h folkloric compositions such as " L a tierra de
Jauja" or " E l corrido del l a v a p l a t o s " and continues in novels like Daniel
Venegas's Las aventuras de don Chipote. A l s o written in English were
A r t u r o Islas's t w o novels: The Rain God (1984), and Migrant Souls
(1990). In the first, Islas chronicles the story of several generations of the
A n g e l family through the reflections of M i g u e l C h i c o - w h o is a writer,
and w h o sets out to uncover all the hidden stories, secrets, and lies that try
to conceal the less o r t h o d o x aspects of his family's life. O f particular
interest are Islas's beautiful descriptions of the desert's landscape, as well
as the (pre-Hispanic) mythological support of his novel. Migrant Souls
essentially continues the saga of the Angels, by further narrating their
existence at the geographical and historical juncture of t w o countries and
cultures. Both novels s h o w a k n o w l e d g e on Islas's part of contemporary
Latin A m e r i c a n literature, from w h i c h he drew inspiration at times.
T h e attention that C h i c a n o literature in general has received from 1970 to

1990 has been due, in part, to the efforts of a g r o w i n g number of critics and
bibliographers, most of them C h i c a n o s , w h o have been able to apply the
latest literary theories and critical approaches in their analysis. Scholars
and critics have at hand n o w for the first time a series of useful
582
Chicano literature
monographs w h i c h provide complete and up-to-date information regard-
ing the nature of C h i c a n o literature. In 1979, t w o collections of essays
appeared, that had a major impact on the development of C h i c a n o literary
criticism: Modern Chicano Writers, edited by Joseph Sommers and
T o m á s Ybarra-Frausto, and The Identification and Analysis of Chicano
Literature, edited by Francisco Jiménez. D u r i n g the 1980s Juan Bruce-
N o v o a collected fourteen interviews under the title Chicano Authors:
Inquiry by Interview, followed in 1982 by his Chicano Poetry: A Response
to Chaos. His study is mostly devoted to male authors, and w a s
supplemented in 1985 by M a r t a E. Sanchez's Contemporary Chicana
Poetry. T o the same genre is devoted Chicano Poetry: A Critical
Introduction, by Cordelia Candelaria, a survey of major trends and
features. T h e novel has been studied by Salvador R o d r i g u e z del Pino {La
novela chicana escrita en español), w h o s e w o r k is limited to five novelists
w h o write in Spanish, and by M a r v i n L e w i s , w h o in the same year
published an Introduction to the Chicano Novel. M o r e recent studies on
narrative include Contemporary Chicano Fiction: A Critical Survey,
edited by V e r n o n E. Lattin, and Chicano Narrative: The Dialectics of
Difference, by R a m ó n Saldivar, w h o utilizes a M a r x i s t approach, also
influenced by deconstruction. T h e critics w h o have dedicated their
attention to the theatre are Jorge Huerta {Chicano Theatre: Themes and
Forms) and N i c o l á s Kanellos {Mexican American Theatre: Legacy and
Reality and A History of Hispanic Theatre in the United States: Origins to
1940). T h e r e are also several reference volumes, a m o n g them Chicano
Literature, by Charles T a t u m , Chicano Literature: A Reference Guide,
edited by Julio A . M a r t i n e z and Francisco A . L o m e l i , Understanding
Chicano Literature, by C a r l R. and Paula W . Shirley, and Chicano
Writers: First Series (1989), w h i c h is v o l u m e LXXXII of the Dictionary of
Literary Biography, and w a s edited by Francisco A . Lomeli and C a r l R.
Shirley. Important bibliographies are those by Ernestina Eger (A Biblio-
graphy of Criticism of Contemporary Chicano Literature), R o b e r t o G .
Trujillo and Andrés R o d r í g u e z {Literatura Chicana: Creative and Critical
Writings Through 1984), and the Chicano Periodical Index, w h i c h n o w
comprises five volumes, under the direction of Richard C h a b r á n .
If w e w a n t e d to g o back to our initial questions, n o w that w e have

summarized w h a t C h i c a n o literature has been like since its antecedents in
colonial times, w e could suggest that C h i c a n o literature is, indeed, a
distinct literature being constantly transformed by its position at the
juncture of A n g l o - and Latin A m e r i c a . It will be impossible to claim that it
belongs exclusively to any of those t w o traditions - as hard as it will be,
for that matter, to conceive of any of them as absolutely fixed entities, or
as national cultures in the narrowest sense. A possible w a y , thus, to
583
approach this particular position of the literature written by C h i c a n o s

w o u l d be to emphasize its transnational aspect, its being a borderlands
culture in continuous reshaping, with continuous (physical and cultural)
crossings from one side to the other. In fact, the perception of C h i c a n o
literature as border literature has been widely used by scholars and
writers, prompting all sorts of performances, publications, and confer
ences on border aesthetics.
Limiting ourselves n o w to the question of the relation of C h i c a n o
literature with Latin A m e r i c a n literature, w e could say that they both
share a s o m e w h a t similar past, characterized by colonization and mesti
zaje. T h e y also share, to a certain degree, a similar oral tradition, w h i c h
motivates certain similitudes in folklore and popular poetry; this is
particularly true, of course, in the case of M e x i c o , and one should be
careful w h e n extrapolating those affinities to the rest of Latin A m e r i c a ,
where different pre-Hispanic cultures have left a different heritage to
present-day societies. W h a t has not been fully shared by Latin A m e r i c a
and the Southwest of the United States is the impulse given to the arts and
sciences by the process of independence of Latin A m e r i c a n nations. A s w e
saw, w h a t is today the Southwest of the United States and California
belonged to the independent republic of M e x i c o for a mere 27-year
period. T h e formation of a national independent conscience w a s not a
major catalyst of cultural change in the Southwest until later, w h e n it w a s
conditioned - in the case of M e x i c a n s in the United States - by their
resistance to the new colonial p o w e r . In fact, if one excludes the folklore -
where resistance and conflict have been continuous attitudes - nationa
lism has not been a major factor influencing literary aesthetics until the
late 1960s/ early 1970s, as w e saw. A l t h o u g h nationalism is still an option
for many, in recent literature the trend seems to be to emphasize the plural
heritage of C h i c a n o s and, w i t h it, their multiple options for national
allegiance.
F r o m a different point of view, contemporary C h i c a n o literature has -
as has almost any other literature in the w o r l d - received influences from
the great United States' authors of the nineteenth and twentieth century,
as well as from their Latin A m e r i c a n counterparts. Y e t these influences
have seldom been direct, as often it is probably more a question of major
changes in contemporary poetry or narrative that affect writers globally in
a non-linear fashion. T h i s is particularly true of the oldest generation of
writers, some of w h o m are largely self-taught (Miguel M é n d e z , for
instance). For the youngest, those w h o hold degrees in Spanish are,
obviously, more likely to possess expert k n o w l e d g e of Latin A m e r i c a n
literature, as is the case with R o n Arias.
W i t h this restriction in mind, it is still clear that both in Latin A m e r i c a
and a m o n g C h i c a n o s similar issues have, at times, become major foci of
584
Chicano literature
reflection. W e have already pointed to some of them, but it may be

w o r t h w h i l e to recall them n o w to close this essay. T h u s , as happened
earlier in Latin A m e r i c a , much of the impulse in C h i c a n o theatre, prose,
and poetry w a s aimed at establishing a literary and cultural identity. Some
writers (such as R. A n a y a ) turned to the landscape and to native beliefs as
the most autocthonous elements of the Southwest. Others, as R o d o l f o
G o n z a l e s or R o l a n d o Hinojosa, turned to history (including oral history)
from a C h i c a n o point of view. M a n y poets, following Alurista, set out to
explore the C h i c a n o language that, for many, w a s meant to be a
combination of English, Spanish, calo, and pre-Hispanic languages
(mainly N a h u a t l , M a y a , and Y a q u i ) ; a new language that w o u l d account
for a n e w national identity. W i t h Alurista and Luis V a l d e z as leaders,
many sought the essence of Chicanismo in the indigenous antecedent, not
unlike the Latin A m e r i c a n Indigenistas. In a sense, the processes of
transculturation that A n g e l R a m a has so eloquently written about, have
also been a key factor for many C h i c a n o writers w h o seek to render their
traditionally oral culture into writing and print, at times in a language
other than that historically used by their culture. Last, but not least, some
social and literary events in Latin A m e r i c a have had a direct impact on
C h i c a n o letters. W e have already mentioned the case of the M e x i c a n
R e v o l u t i o n , w h i c h brought large segments of the population - a m o n g
them many intellectuals - to the United States, but that also produced an
important novelistic movement that influenced some C h i c a n o writers. W e
could also mention n o w the impact of the C u b a n Revolution of 1959, or
the fact that many of the "neoindigenist" writers of the 1970s have been
very active - particularly in the 1980s - in the movements of solidarity
with Central A m e r i c a , thus creating a series of contacts that did not exist
before. Alejandro M u r g u i a , José M o n t o y a , L u c h a C o r p i , Juan Felipe
Herrera, and Francisco X . A l a r c ó n , are a m o n g the group that, in one w a y
or another, engage in this socio-poetical dialogue w i t h other writers and
militants from El Salvador, N i c a r a g u a , or G u a t e m a l a , whether they live in
the United States or in their countries of origin.
Links have a l w a y s existed to keep alive the communication between
Latin A m e r i c a n and C h i c a n o literatures. Y e t those have not been of the
cause-effect type, as some form of cultural dependency. T h e y have rather
been connected to specific population movements (the last one being the
influx of refugees from Central A m e r i c a and immigrants from all over
Latin A m e r i c a experienced between 1970 and 1990), and to a broad
dissemination of w o r k s by Latin A m e r i c a n writers in the United States,
especially after the 1970s. In the case of M e x i c o , the contacts have also
been kept alive thanks to the constant border crossings in one direction or
the other, personal visits to M e x i c o by C h i c a n o writers, relatives w h o still
live in that country, and cultural exchanges of international scope.
585
CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF L A T I N A M E R I C A N LITERATURE
T h i s constant communication, h o w e v e r , has not succeeded in consoli-

dating the dissemination of C h i c a n o literature in Latin A m e r i c a . C h i c a n o
authors have experienced difficulties in publishing in Latin A m e r i c a n
countries, and, if one excludes Hinojosa's Klail City y sus alrededores
(published by C a s a de las Americas in C u b a ) , there are no C h i c a n o b o o k s
published in countries other than M e x i c o . M e x i c a n press Joaquin M o r t i z
published the first t w o novels by Alejandro M o r a l e s in the 1970s and, in
1980, F o n d o de Cultura E c o n ó m i c a published T i n o Villanueva's Chica-
nos, an anthology of C h i c a n o literature in Spanish, later joined by O s c a r
S o m o z a ' s Nueva narrativa chicana (Diogenes, 1983). In the late 1980s, the
paucity of publications seems to have changed s o m e h o w , and w o r k s by
M i g u e l M é n d e z M . have been published by Ediciones Era {Peregrinos de
Aztlán, 1989, a reprint of the original 1974 edition) and by the Universidad
de Guadalajara (El sueño de Santa Maria de las Piedras, 1986); R i c a r d o
Aguilar (b. 1947) has published his stories Madreselvas en flor (Universi-
dad V e r a c r u z a n a , 1987) and Amelia (Universidad A u t ó n o m a de C i u d a d
Juárez, C o l e c c i ó n Premio José Fuentes M a r e s , 1990); Sergio Elizondo
published Muerte en una estrella (Tinta N e g r a , 1984), a novel where the
denouncing of social injustices (the killings of C h i c a n o youngsters) is
embedded in a highly lyrical and symbolical narrative w i t h musical
undertones, a feature also characteristic of Suruma (1990), his latest
novel. Other authors have been published in journals (Fern devoted t w o
issues to C h i c a n a artists), and one b o o k by G a r y Soto has appeared in
translation (Como arbustos de niebla [Latitudes]). W h a t all this means is
that C h i c a n o literature, and in particular that w h i c h is still written in
Spanish, is consolidating its presence in M e x i c o ; hopefully this will mean
that, in the near future, publications will also be available in other
countries of Latin A m e r i c a .
586

Luis Leal and Manuel M - Martín-Rodríguez: Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Luis Leal and Manuel M - Martín-Rodríguez: Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Luis Leal and Manuel M - Martín-Rodríguez: Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

[ 17 ]

H o w can the inclusion of a section on C h i c a n o literature in a history of

Literature or Hispanic-American literature? If we open a book about

If this theory is accepted, C h i c a n o literature could not be studied

conflicts with the native peoples. T h e settlers of w h a t are n o w the

T h e myth of the Seven Cities became a topos of this literature and w a s

O r t e g o says about N e w W o r l d literatures in general applies perfectly well

Y o soy aquel capitán,

By the time of the M e x i c a n W a r s of Independence ( 1 8 1 0 - 1 8 2 1 ) , and due

leadership of General H u g h M c L e o d , tried to e x p a n d their territory into

H e ended the p o e m - while discussing the situation of M e x i c a n teachers -

pues es de gran interés

includes numerous metaliterary digressions that provide a guide for its

pericos mamen by Daniel V e n e g a s (?), a satirical piece first published by

to create memorable characters like Señor G a r z a , for w h o m one of his

people of the border have created about G r e g o r i o C o r t e z . C o r t e z became

C h i c a n o b o o k s in mainstream presses. W i t h the exception of Pocho and

depicts life a m o n g migrant C h i c a n o w o r k e r s from T e x a s as seen through

C o u n t y , supposedly located in the l o w e r R i o grande Valley area. T h e first

and death are monuments to his people's endurance and pride. M o r e

of M e x i c a n A m e r i c a n s . A s a consequence of this b o o k ' s notoriety, the

T r a d i t o r a : A Paradigmatic Figure of C h i c a n a F e m i n i s m " (1989). It will be

In narrative, the abundance and quality of the prose written by Chicanas

experience/encounter w i t h M e x i c o - the M o t h e r l a n d . Sapogonia, on the

difference in class identification separating them from feminists in Latin

T h e attention that C h i c a n o literature in general has received from 1970 to

If w e w a n t e d to g o back to our initial questions, n o w that w e have

approach this particular position of the literature written by C h i c a n o s

reflection. W e have already pointed to some of them, but it may be

T h i s constant communication, h o w e v e r , has not succeeded in consoli-

You might also like