Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomers: Synthesis, and Study of Effective Structural Parameters
Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomers: Synthesis, and Study of Effective Structural Parameters
Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomers: Synthesis, and Study of Effective Structural Parameters
ABSTRACT
In this study two classes of polyols, a polyether and a polyester, are used
for synthesizing thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers . These elastomers
are prepared by chain extension of polyol/toluene diisocyanate by prepoly-
mer method and a variety of chain extenders, The effect of polyester and
polyether polyols and chain extenders on thermal stability have been invest-
igated by studying their morphology using dynamic mechanical thermal
analysis (DMTA), and thermogravimetrlc analysis (FGA) . The physical and
mechanical properties of prepared polyurethane elastomers are measured.
The obtained results are investigated and discussed.
Key Words: thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer, synthesis, structural parameters, chain extender, morphology
231
Rarikxa at . cr al.
Table 2. Comparison of thermal stability of synthesized is related to the polar nature of esteric bonds.
elstamers by polyester and polyether, TDI and various Also in each set of elastomers, the thermal
chain extenders in N 2 atmosphere (molar ratio 1 :3:2). stability of TPUE is increased with the increasing
Type of chain
length of chain extenders. There are two reasons
Thermal stability (C)
extender
for this, one is that, the block ratio, polyol and
diisocyanate are the same in each group, and
palyether polyol polyester polyol
length of chain extender is the only variable
PTHF CAPA 225
parameter . The degree of polymerization of these
systems is nearly equal, because polymerization
EG 268 .82 269 .96
conditions are constant for all of these elastomers.
PD 303.33 306 .64
With longer chain extender, the longer polymer
BD 312 .33 313 .23
chain is obtained because polymer chain is produc-
HD 315 .44 322 .48
ed from the repetition of polyol, diisocyanate and
DD 317 .25 332 .02
chain extender. Thermal energy distribution in
longer chain is better than shorter chain and
(25 °C) and 40% relative humidity before testing. hence, the thermal stability in the former is better
than the latter.
The second reason is that, the polymer chain
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION with longer chain extender has longer hard
segment. The length of hard segment has an effect
After synthesizing TPUE in laboratory with various on phase separation. Elastomers with higher phase
polyols and chain extenders, the effect of structural separation have superior properties such as
parameters were studied . Thermal stability of thermal stability.
synthesized elastomers was investigated by using The test of DMTA is used for determination
thermal gravimetry (TG) . The rate of heating was of a-transition temperature. The a-transition
10 ° L/min and the test was carried out in an N2 temperature is a good criterion of glass transition
atmosphere . The results of thermal stability are temperature (TO ).
shown in Table 2, and they indicate that polyester Figure I shows the comparison between
based PU elastomers are more stable than tan 6 of two groups of synthesized elastomers.
polyether based PU clastomers. This phenomenon The chain extender for both clastomers is 1,4-
1 .2 butane diol . The glass transition temperature of
polyether based elastomer is 10 °C lower than poly-
1 .0 ester based elastomer . This is due to more flexibi-
lity of etheric band and higher phase separation in
0 .8 comparison with esterie bond.
Table 3 shows a-transition temperature for
c 0.6 polyester based elastomers . There is no significant
e-
Polyether
change in a-transition temperature.
0.4 Polyester
The tana of clastomers based on polyester
polyol are shown in Figure 2 . In these peaks, the
0 .2
sharpness of slope claims quality of phase separa-
tion [S] . The synthesized PU elastomer with 1,10-
eC
-80 -40 0 40 80 decane dint has the sharpest peak, and consequent-
Figure 1 . Tan 6 for two elastomers based an polyether ly, it has the greatest phase separation.
and polyester polyol with TDI and 1 .4-butane dial (molar The effect of polyester and polyether polyols
ratio 1 3 :2) . on tensile properties is important . Table 3 shows
Table 3 . a-Transition temperatures for synthesized elasto- Table 4 . Ultimate strength of synthesized elastomers:
mers : CAPA 225/TDI by various chain extenders (molar CAPA 225 and TDl by various extenders (molar ratio 1 :3 :2).
ratio 13 :2)
Type of chain Ultimate strength (N/mm 2)
Type of chain extnder a-Transition extender
temperature ( ` C) PTHF CAPA 225
that the ultimate tensile strength of polyester elastomers are shown in Table 5 . In both, poly-
based elastomers is higher than polyesher based ether and polyester based urethanes, elongation at
elastomers due to polarity of polyesters and signi- break is increased with increasing chain extenders
ficant amount of hydrogen banding. molecular weight . Obviously the longer the chain
In both groups, elastomers with 1,6-hexane length the longer the hard segment would be.
dial and 1,10-dccane dial have high strength, Thus, during final stage in tensile tests, the chains
respectively . The length of the employed chain slip over each other and the probability of
extender has two opposite effects, with decreasing urethane group to remain adjacent and repack in
length, high density of urethane bonds and hydro- longer intervals is greater, and therefore, the
gen bonds are produced, but they are accompanied elastomers show higher elongation at break.
with weaker phase separations . The tensile The results of hardness test for both groups
properties are resultant of two opposite effects, In are presented in Table 6 . The hardness of poly-
both elastomers, the loss tangent peaks arc with ether based elastomer is slightly higher than
approximately the same sharpness, but the density polyester one . The data obtained show variation
of hydrogen bonds in 1,6-hexane dial is higher than from 57 Shore A to 60 Shore A for polyester based
1,10-dccane dial and hence, the tensile strength of elastomer . Thus it is deduced that the effect of
TPUEs synthesized with 1,6-hexane dial is higher chain extenders molecular weight on the hardness
than 1,10-decane diol. data is not considerable.
Elongation at break or the synthesized Tear test on the synthesized elastomers was
1 .4
1 .2
Table S . Elongation at break of synthesized elastomers:
CAPA 225 and PTHFITDI and different chain extenders
1 .0 - (molar ratio 1 :3 :2).
u 0 .8-
Type of chain Elongation at break (%)
1_ 0 .6 . extender
PTHF CAPA 225
EG 375 412
'C PD 430 448
-80 -40 0 40 80 BD 501 539
Figure 2 . Comparison of tan r5 for synthesized elastomers HD 506 575
with CAPA 2251TD1 by various chain extenders (molar ratio DD 893 748
1 :3 :2) .
8ankani M. ci al.
Table 6. Hardness (Shore A) for synthesized elaslomers polyether based elastomer, but the polyethers
with CAPA 225 and PTHFITOI by various chain extenders based urethanes are slightly harder.
(molar ratio 1 :3 :2). DMTA studies for both groups of elastomers
show that an elastomer with larger chain extender
Type of chain Hardness (Shore A)
has a larger hard segment, and a better phase
extender
separation . By increasing the phase separation,
PTHF CAPA 225
good physical and mechanical properties are
expected.
EG 64 .85 60.41
P12 59 .99 58.43
8D 61 .81 59 .43
REFERENCES
HD 62 .83 59 .8
DD 60.45 56.64
1. Hager S . I .., McRury T. a, [Gcrkin R . M . and Critchfeld
F. B ., I8Oth ACS National Meeting Preprint, 149, Aug
Table 7. Tear strength of synthesized elastomers with 24–29, 1981.
CAPA 225 and PTHFITTOI by various chain extenders 2. Kipphardt H., Polyurethanes World Congress, 146, 1987.
(molar ratio 1 :3 :2). 3. Russell D ., Urethane Technol . (19–25) June/July 1989.
4. Modest Growth fur TI' Us, Urethane Tactual!. 13, June/July
Type of chain Tear strength (kNlm)
I992.
extender
5, Aekwell .1 . Bl., Nagaragan M . K . and Ilntink T . B ., ACS,
PTHF CAPA 225
179, 1981.
6. Barikani M . . Thermally Stable Polyurethane Elastomers.
EG 16.176 22 .387
Their Synthesis and Properties (Ph .i) 'Thesis), Lough-
PD 10.485 54.920
borough University, 1986.
BD 15 .390 43 .973
7. Ifephurn C. Polyurethane Elustamers; Applied Science, pp.
HD 28 .308 58 .612
28–8.1, and 249–268 . 1982.
OD 5.504 34,86*
8. Ng. H . N ., AIlegree s A F.., Seymour R . W . . and Cooper
• It should be noted that, since slippage occurred during test carried out S . I .., Polymer, 14, June 1973.
on this sample and no complete tear resulted . thus it should bo treated 9. Mark H . F ., et at .Encyctopedia of Polymer Science and
with caution. Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, pp . 247–280, and
296–298, 1985.
also carried out . The samples were in a strip form 10.Recent Advances in the Chemistry and Technology of
with 35X12 mm dimensions and with a 2 mm notch It rel have Elastomers, International Rubber Conference,
in the middle. By stretching the sample with testing Kiev, pp. 1–37, 10–14 Oct, 1978.
machine, the maximum force of tear is reported. 11.Brains P . F ., Polyurethanes 7'ecltnology . John Wiley &
and tear strengths are calculated by T=kN/m, in Sons, pp . 181–214, 1969.
which m is thickness in meter . From Table 7 it is 12. Harrell L. L. Jr., Macromolecules, 2, ti, 607 . 1969.
shown that the data for tear strength of polyester 13. Ferguson 1 ., t{nurston D.L, Meredith R. and Patsavoudis
based urethanes group are higher than polyether D ., Fur Polym. J., 8 . 369, 1972.
CONCLUSION