Quality of Life of People Living With HIV/AIDS in Cross River, Nigeria
Quality of Life of People Living With HIV/AIDS in Cross River, Nigeria
Quality of Life of People Living With HIV/AIDS in Cross River, Nigeria
Original Article
ABSTRACT
Background: People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) now enjoy appreciable
longevity and there is need to enhance their quality of life. Unfortunately,
limited studies in Nigeria have used the World Health Organization Quality Of
Life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) to determine the quality of life of PLWHA. Aim:
This study was to assess the quality of life of PLWHA participating in five
support groups in Southern Cross River Senatorial District. Methods: The
study was a descriptive survey. It was delimited to PLWHA who belonged to
support groups and were available to complete the questionnaire. A total of
123 PLWHA were recruited into the study. WHOQOL BREF was used for
data collection. Results: The mean (SD) age of the PLWHA was 36.4 +/-
10.9. Most 83(67.5%) were females while 40 (32.5%) were males (Figure 1).
With regards to education, most of the respondents 60(48.8%) attended
secondary school, followed by 48(39%) who attended tertiary institutions
while only 15(12.2%) had primary education (Figure 2).The highest mean
(SD) quality of life score emanated from physical health, 14.04+2.66.The
mean (SD) scores in the three domains were similar among the PLWHA:
psychological health, 13.55+ 2.45; social relation, 13.60+3.01; environment,
13.25+2.58. Conclusion: The study suggests that the lower mean score for
environment may be an indication of poverty and poor living conditions while
higher mean score for physical health may suggest accessibility to anti
retroviral drugs. Therefore it was suggested that loan should made
accessible to PLWHA in Cross River State. This should empower them to
establish means of livelihood.
Key words: Quality of life, people living with HIV/AIDS, physical health,
psychological health, WHOQOL-BREF, Nigeria
[3]
INTRODUCTION a prevalence rate of over 15%. Nigeria
had 2.98 million infected people with adult
Joint United Nations Programme on prevalence rate of 3.6 and orphans were
[1,4]
HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimated that at least 2,175,760 as at 2009. Although, there is
33.3 million people lived with HIV/AIDS in a slight decrease in adult prevalence rate
2009, with 1.8 million HIV/AIDS related from 4.4% in 2005 to 3.6% in 2009;
deaths, and 2.6 new infections.
[1,2] O‟ConnelSkevinton and Saxena posit that
Furthermore, many African countries have the rate of HIV/AIDS pandemic in
Educational
status Non formal
Primary 6 4.9
Secondary 9 7.3
Tertiary 60 48.8
48 39.0
Environment
The highest mean (SD) quality of life score PLWHA: psychological health, 13.55+
emanated from physical health, 2.45; social relation, 13.60+3.01;
14.04+2.66. The mean (SD) scores in the environment, 13.25+2.58 (Figure 1).
three domains were similar among the
The result of gender status in Table 3 that the overall mean scores in the two
showed no significant difference in all the domains (physical and psychological
[13]
domains of QoL. The calculated t-value in health domains) were similar. It was also
all the domains of QoL were less than the noted that the scores in Fatiregun et al.
critical t-value of 1.97 at 0.05 level of study were higher than what were obtained
[13]
significance with 121 degree of freedom. in this study. Regarding physical health
Further results also showed that majority of having the highest score this may be
the respondents rated their QoL scores as attributed to the availability of anti retro-
good 57 (46.3%), very good 21 (17.1%) viral therapy which is highly subsidized by
[8]
while 21 (17.1%) said their QoL scores the government.
were neither poor nor good. Regarding
being satisfied with health, majority of the It was also observed that environment had
respondents 59 (48%) said they were the lowest mean score followed by
„satisfied‟ with their health; 13 (10.6%) psychological health. These results are
[13]
were „very satisfied‟ with their health while also in consonance with Fatiregun et al.
27 (22%) were neither „satisfied nor study which also highlighted lower mean
dissatisfied‟. scores in environment. Similar results were
also observed in Soa Paulo, Brazil that the
DISCUSSION mean scores for social relationships and
environment domains fell in the
[12]
In this study, the overall QoL mean scores intermediate level. Environment domain
in the three domains (psychological health, measures financial resources, freedom,
social relation and environment) were physical safety and security, health and
similar and they fell within the intermediate social care: accessibility and quality, home
level. It was also noted that physical health environment, opportunity for acquiring new
had the highest score. These results are information and skills, participation in and
affirmed by Fatiregun et al. which observed opportunities for recreation/leisure
Nigeria, 2005-2009. Federal Ministry of the impact of gender and injection drug
Health. Nigeria. 2004 use. J Neurovirol 2005;11:138-43.
9. Samson-Akpan PE, Ella RE, Ojong IN. 17. Joint United Nations Programme on AIDS.
Influence of home-based care on the 2007. AIDS epidemic update.
quality of life of people living with 07.27E/JC1322E,Geneva: World Health
HIV/AIDS in Cross River State. Global J Organization/UNAIDS.
Pure and Appl Sci 2012;8:95-103. 18. Hughes J,Jelsma J, Maclean E, Darder M,
10. Geurtsen B. Quality of life and living with Tinise X. The health-related quality of life
HIV/AIDS in Cambodia. Transcult Nurs of people living with HIV/AIDS. Disabil
2005;16:41-49. Rehabil 2004;26:371-376.
11. World Health Organisation. What is quality 19. McDowell I and Newell C. Measuring
of life? World Health Forum 1996;1:354- health: A guide to rating scales and
356. questionnaires, 2nd ed. Oxford Press,
12. Elisabete C, Marandi DS, Ivan FJ, New York; 1996.
Fermanda L . Quality of life of people 20. Saxena S, O‟Connell K, Underwood L. A
living with HIV in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Rev commentary: Cross cultural quality of life
Saude Publica 2007;41 assessment at the end of life.
www.scielo.br/pdf/rsp/v41s2/en_5947.pdf Gerontologist 2002;42:S81-85.
on 25th October, 2013. 21. Global AIDS Initiative in Nigeria. Basic
13. Fatiregun AA, Mofolorunsho KC, facts on HIV/AIDS and situation in Nigeria.
Osagbemi KG. Quality of life of people GHAIN. Calabar, 2007.
living with HIV/AIDS in Kogi State, Nigeria. 22. Positive Development Foundation (PDF).
Benin J Postgrad Med 2009;11:21-27. Conscientizing against Injustice and
14. Fleck MPA, Louzada S, Xavier M, Violence(CAIV). Records on support
Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, groups, 2010. World Health Organization.
Pinzon V. Aplicacao da WHOQOL-BREF. U.S., 1997.
versaoemportugues do instrument
abreviado de avaliacao da qualidade de
vida “WHOQOL-Bref”. Rev Saude Publica
2000;34:178-83.
15. Mrus JM, WilliamsPL, Chon ST, Wu doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14194/ijmbr.238
AW,Tseva J. Gender differences in health-
related quality of life in patients with How to cite this article: Samson-Akpan
HIV/AIDS. Quality of life research: Qual PE, Ojong IN, Ella R, Edet OB. Quality of
Life Res An International Journal of
life of people living with HIV/AIDS in
Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care
and Rehabilitation 2005;14:479-491. Cross River State, Nigeria. Int J Med
16. Wisniewski AB, Apel S, Selnes O A, Nath Biomed Res 2013;2(3):207-212
A, McArthur JC, Dobs AS. Depressive
symptom, quality of life and neuro- Conflict of Interest: None declared
psychological performance in HIV/AIDS:
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial, share-alike use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.