Vegetable Corp. V Trinidad
Vegetable Corp. V Trinidad
Vegetable Corp. V Trinidad
This action is brought to recover back merchants’ percentage taxes to the amount of
P19,975.70 levied on consignments under section 1459 of Act No. 2711 and paid by the
plaintiff under protest, which states: All merchants not herein specifically exempted shall
pay a tax of one per centum on the gross value in money of the commodities, goods,
wares, and merchandise sold, bartered, exchanged, or consigned abroad by them, such
tax to be based on the actual selling price or value of the things in question at the time
they are disposed of or consigned, whether consisting of raw material or of
manufactured or partially manufactured products, and whether of domestic or foreign
origin. Xxx “Merchant,” as here used, means a person engaged in the sale, barter, or
exchange of personal property of whatever character.
Plaintiff is engaged in the purchase of copra and shipment of such copra to its mills in
the US for manufacture of vegetable oil, to be sold there. In three occasions, the
defendant demanded a tax under the said statute, which was paid by plaintiff under
protest.
ISSUE: Whether it was proper to issue the merchants’ percentage tax on plaintiff?
RULING:
Yes. A consignment of goods is otherwise taxable, the tax should be assessed and collected
regardless of the personality of the consignor or consignee. A shipment of goods abroad is no
less taxable under this section, through consigned to the order of the shipper himself. He has
acted throughout as agent, and it is to be assumed, in the absence of proof to the contrary, that
the money which went into the public coffers belonged to his principal. Besides, as consignor of
the exported product, the plaintiff was apparently the person directly responsible to the Collector
for the taxes due on the several consignments.
In the present case it is not disputed that the plaintiff corporation was the consignor of the
merchandise, but it is strenuously argued that inasmuch as it is not “engaged in the sale, barter,
or exchanged of personal property” in the Philippine Islands, it is not a merchant within the
statutory definition of the term and therefore cannot be required to pay the consignment tax.
However, the statute itself does not provide that the sale, barter, or exchange must take place in
the Philippine Islands in order to make a person engaged in such business a merchant.
The consignment tax is not a sales tax. The fact that it is provided for in the same section as the
sales tax does not necessarily make it so.