Pathophysiology and Treatment Syok Septic in Pediatric
Pathophysiology and Treatment Syok Septic in Pediatric
Pathophysiology and Treatment Syok Septic in Pediatric
Tre a t m e n t o f S e p t i c
Shock in Neonates
a, b
James L. Wynn, MD *, Hector R. Wong, MD
KEYWORDS
Neonate Sepsis Shock Treatment Pathophysiology
Sepsis or serious infection within the first 4 weeks of life kills more than 1 million
newborns globally every year.1 The attack rate for neonatal sepsis is variable (from
<1% to >35% of live births) based on gestational age and time of onset (early [<72
hours after birth] or late [>72 hours after birth]).2–5 Neonates with sepsis may present
in or progress to septic shock, exemplified initially by cardiovascular dysfunction
requiring fluid resuscitation or inotropic support.6 If the progression of infection cannot
be stopped, end-organ damage and death become much more likely. Although the
true incidence is not known, a recent retrospective cohort study of 3800 neonates
admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in a 6-year period reported septic
shock in 1.3% with an associated mortality peaking at 71% for extremely low birth
weight (ELBW) neonates less than 1000 g.7 There are few published data regarding
the pathophysiology of septic shock in neonates. Previous clinical investigations
into neonatal sepsis and shock have largely focused on diagnostic markers. Descrip-
tions of septic shock are predominantly case reports on very small numbers, mixed
populations with severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and sepsis, or pediatric
studies that included neonates who were not evaluated as a separate group.8–24
a
Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, 2424
Hock Plaza, Suite 504, DUMC Box 2739, Durham, NC 27710, USA
b
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet
Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected]
443
444 Wynn & Wong
Risk factors for a neonate developing sepsis have been well described. Although risk
factors for septic shock overlap those for sepsis, specific antenatal and postnatal risks
for the development of neonatal septic shock have not been described in detail.
Maternal factors contributing to the risk of neonatal sepsis are shown in Box 1 and
include prematurity, low birth weight, rectovaginal colonization with group B strepto-
coccus (GBS), prolonged rupture of membranes, maternal intrapartum fever, and cho-
rioamnionitis.2,3,27–33
Factors in the postnatal period associated with an increased risk of sepsis or septic
shock include male gender, birth weight less than 1000 g, hypogammaglobulinemia,
intravenous alimentation, central venous catheters, use of steroids or drugs that
decrease gastric acid acidity, and prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation. The
development of severe necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is also associated with severe
sepsis, shock, multi-organ system failure, and death.34,35 Genetic evaluations in chil-
dren and adults have identified several polymorphisms in cytokines and their recep-
tors as well as other host defense proteins that may either increase or decrease risk
for sepsis or poor outcome from sepsis.36–41 However, gene polymorphism studies
in neonates have not yielded consistent results because of relatively small sample
sizes and a general lack of formal prospective validation studies.42–56
Several pathogens have been associated with sepsis in the neonatal period. The
predominant agents are bacterial, but viruses including herpes simplex and enterovi-
ruses have been associated with fulminant neonatal sepsis with high mortality.57–59 In
1 study, gram-negative infection accounted for 38% of cases of septic shock and
62.5% of sepsis mortality.7 These results are similar to those from a previous study
that showed gram-negative infection was associated with 69% of cases of fulminant
septic shock (death within 48 hours).60 Gram-positive causes of sepsis are dominated
by GBS and coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS).3,61 Although lethality and
shock from GBS have been well described, mortality associated with CoNS is
extremely low3,4 and septic shock is rare.60 Fungi (primarily Candida albicans) may
also lead to fulminant neonatal sepsis and predominantly affect ELBW infants.3,62,63
Studies of neonatal sepsis are confounded by the limitations of sensitivity of the
current diagnostic gold standard blood culture. Sample volume constraints in
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 445
Box 1
Risk factors for the development of neonatal sepsis and septic shock
Maternal factors
Maternal age (>30 years)
Lack of prenatal care
High gravidity
Premature or prolonged (>6 hours) rupture of membrane (PROM)
Meconium-stained amniotic fluid
Foul-smelling amniotic fluid
Premature labor
Chorioamnionitis
GBS rectovaginal colonization
Urinary tract infection
Intrapartum fever
Multiple courses of prenatal steroids or tocolytic agents
Prolonged duration of internal monitoring
Delivery room
Prematurity <37 weeks
Low birth weight %2500 g
5-minute Apgar score <5
Resuscitation in delivery room
Male gender
Neonatal
Vascular catheterization
Mechanical ventilation (continuous positive airway pressure or endotracheal tube)
Lack of enteral feeding
Gastrointestinal tract pathology
Medications (H2 blockers, proton pump inhibitors; postnatal steroids, cephalosporins)
Neutropenia
Decreased baseline serum IgG concentrations
Hyperalimentation
Prolonged hospital stay
Delay in time to regain birth weight
447
448 Wynn & Wong
production of TNF-a, IL-1b, and IL-8.113 IL-18 primes PMNs for degranulation with
production of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) on subsequent stimulation.114 Dys-
regulation of many of these functions linked to IL-18 are seen in sepsis and septic
shock.
Proinflammatory cytokine production leads to activation of endothelial cells
including increased expression of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that facilitate leuko-
cyte recruitment and diapedesis (Fig. 2). Upregulation of CAMs (soluble ICAM, VCAM,
L-, P-, and E-selectins, and CD11b/CD18) during sepsis facilitates rolling and extra-
vascular migration of leukocytes.115–118 Decreased neonatal PMN and monocyte L-
selectin and MAC-1 expression impair accumulation at sites of inflammation.119,120
Chemokine gradients produced by endothelial cells and local macrophages are
necessary in addition to CAM interactions for effective and specific leukocyte attrac-
tion and accumulation. Without adequate leukocyte recruitment, there is increased
risk for propagation from a local to a systemic infection. Although poor cellular chemo-
taxis in the neonate has been observed, it is not likely a result of reduced serum
concentrations of chemokines.121 Suboptimal chemotaxis may be related to other
mechanisms such as poor complement receptor upregulation following stimula-
tion,122 deficiencies in another downstream signaling process,123 or inhibition by
bacterial products.124
A wide variety of chemokines are increased during sepsis including IP-10, CCL5
(RANTES), MCP-1, MIP-1, and IL-8.125 Other chemoattractive molecules are also
increased in sepsis including complement proteins C3a and C5a, host defense
proteins or peptides such as cathelicidins and defensins, and components of invading
bacteria themselves.101,109 The role of chemoattractive substances in the pathogen-
esis of severe sepsis is highlighted by recent studies showing IL-8 can be used as
a stratifying factor for survival in children126 and C5a is implicated in sepsis-associated
organ dysfunction in adults.68 Studies of chemokines in neonates with sepsis have
shown that IP-10 is a sensitive early marker of infection,125 and decreased levels of
CCL5 help predict development of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).127
Antiinflammatory Response
If inflammatory homeostasis is not restored, the consequences can include SIRS,
which is associated with multi-organ failure and death (Fig. 3). The careful interplay
between anti- and proinflammatory stimuli serves to govern the immune response
to allow local pathogen containment but prevent systemic activation leading to
excessive inflammatory damage through SIRS.128 Near simultaneous increases in
antiinflammatory cytokine production occur during infection, with TGF-b, IL-4, IL-10,
IL-11, and IL-13 countering the actions of proinflammatory cytokines (see
Fig. 2).101,129,130 These mediators blunt the activation of phagocytic cells, block fever,
modify coagulation factor expression, and decrease production of ROI/RNI, NO, and
other vasoactive mediators.131–135 In addition to the antiinflammatory cytokines,
specific soluble cytokines and receptor antagonists produced during sepsis modulate
proinflammatory mediator action, including TNFR2 (which regulates the concentration
of TNF-a), sIL-6R, sIL2, and IL-1ra. Increases in these inhibitors have been docu-
mented in neonatal sepsis with resolution following effective treatment.130,136,137
The role of these regulatory cytokine inhibitors in the immune response to neonatal
sepsis and septic shock has been incompletely characterized. Soluble RAGE (sRAGE)
competes with cell-bound RAGE for the binding of HMGB-1 and other RAGE
ligands,138 reduces the intensity of the inflammatory response, and is increased in
adults during sepsis.139 In addition, administration of exogenous sRAGE improved
survival and reduced inflammation in infected adult rodents.140
450
Wynn & Wong
Fig. 2. Cellular recruitment and endothelial activation following pathogen detection. Pathogen-stimulated tissue/blood monocytes, dendritic cells (DC),
and macrophages release proinflammatory cytokines that activate the surrounding endothelium. Endothelial activation results in upregulation of CAM,
production of chemokines and vasoactive substances, activation of complement, and development of a procoagulant state. Recruitment of PMNs occurs
along the chemokine gradient surrounding the area of inflammation. Antiinflammatory cytokines counter the actions of proinflammatory cytokines to
prevent excessive cellular activation and recruitment that can result in tissue damage and systemic inflammation. Endothelium can be damaged when
PMNs release ROI. LTE, leukotriene; NO, nitric oxide; PMN, neutrophil.
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 451
Fig. 3. Pathophysiology of neonatal sepsis and septic shock. AEM, antimicrobial effector
mechanisms; CV, cardiovascular; DAMP, danger-/damage-associated molecular patterns;
DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; PRR, pattern recognition receptors; SIRS,
systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
vascular endothelium allowing for increased cell recruitment to the site of infection.150
Deficiencies in C5aR found in term neonates compared with adults may limit the ability
to respond to C5a and therefore increase the likelihood of infection.151 The expression
of C5aR on neutrophils of preterm infants has not been quantified.
Complement regulatory proteins modify the effects of complement and prevent potential
damage caused by over activation. In particular, CD59 blocks formation of C9 polymeriza-
tion and target lysis, CD55 destabilizes CR1 and C3 and C5 convertases, and CD35 (CR1)
accelerates the deactivation of C3b.152 The role of these regulators in the neonatal
response to sepsis and septic shock is presently unknown. Dysregulation of complement
activation can lead to a vicious activation cycle that results in excessive cellular stimulation,
cytokine production, endothelial cell activation, and local tissue damage. Dysregulation
likely contributes to the development of SIRS and shock (see Fig. 3).153
Data in adults link increased C5a levels with multiple facets of sepsis-associated
pathology such as the development of DIC via increased tissue factor expression,
cardiomyopathy, increased proinflammatory cytokine levels and the development of
SIRS, adrenal insufficiency, and neutrophil dysfunction.68 Whether or not C5a or other
complement proteins play a role in the development of these phenomena in septic
neonates remains to be determined.
457
458 Wynn & Wong
Therapeutic Endpoints
In the absence of widely available or well-tested methods for quantifying hemody-
namic compromise in septic shock in neonates, clinicians generally rely on vital
signs and physical examination for decisions about therapy. Although mean arterial
pressure (MAP) may not reflect systemic blood flow, monitoring blood pressure and
other measures such as capillary refill time and urine output provide indirect infor-
mation on the adequacy of organ blood flow. Suggestions for cardiovascular thera-
peutic end points in term neonates include a capillary refill time of less than 2
seconds, normal pulses without differential between peripheral and central pulses,
warm extremities, urine output greater than 1 ml/kg/h, low serum lactate, and mixed
venous saturation of more than 70%.256 Therapeutic end points in premature
neonates have not been established but the goals for term infants seem reasonable.
ELBW infants present the greatest challenge for determination of therapeutic end
points in septic shock. Assessment of MAP, urine output, and capillary refill may
not be particularly useful determinates of systemic blood flow in ELBW infants,
particularly in the first 72 hours of life.257 In addition, the contribution of fetal hemo-
globin may complicate accurate determination of central venous oxygen saturation
(ScvO2) in neonates. ScvO2 obtained using hemoglobin A calibration is 4% to 7%
higher compared with ScvO2 that accounts for fetal hemoglobin258 implying that
perhaps the goal ScvO2 should be different in neonates than in older patients for
optimum tissue oxygen delivery.
In the future, monitoring techniques such as functional echocardiography (FE) and
near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) may provide physiologic data to optimize manage-
ment of septic shock. FE provides a bedside means to assess cardiac output, periph-
eral vascular resistance, and organ blood flow in response to volume, colloid, and
vasoactive medications.259,260 FE can also be used to assess superior vena cava
(SVC) flow, which has been suggested as a surrogate marker for cerebral blood
flow261 and should be maintained at 40 ml/kg/min or higher.262 Prolonged decreases
in SVC flow are associated with impaired neurodevelopmental outcome in very
preterm neonates.263 In the absence of FE to monitor SVC flow, a capillary refill
time of more than 4 seconds combined with a serum lactate concentration of more
than 4 mmol/L had a specificity of 97% for identifying VLBW infants with a low SVC
flow state on the first day of life.264 NIRS can be used to monitor end-organ perfusion
noninvasively265 and is used often in neonates with congenital heart disease.266 A
combination of FE and NIRS, in conjunction with traditional measures (MAP, SpO2,
capillary refill, urine output) as well as intermittent laboratory evaluations of tissue
perfusion such as pH, mixed venous saturation, lactate, and base deficit would be
ideal for monitoring severity of septic shock and response to therapy.
Management of Hypotension and Cardiovascular Support
An algorithm for time-sensitive, goal-directed stepwise management of hemodynamic
support for the term newborn with septic shock has been established and should be
followed.255 Preterm neonates require specific caveats to this algorithm because of
their unique physiology and risk for complications (see Fig. 4).
In contrast to term neonates, the definition of hypotension and shock in preterm
neonates is less clear, particularly in the immediate newborn period.26 Blood pres-
sure may be a poor indicator of systemic blood flow in preterm neonates,225 yet
objective measures of adequacy of tissue perfusion and oxygenation delivery are
lacking. Another confounding variable in the management of neonatal shock is that
inotrope use (dopamine, dobutamine) in hypotensive preterm neonates has not
been shown to significantly improve short- or long-term outcomes.227,267,268 These
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 459
There have been many attempts directed at improving outcomes of sepsis and septic
shock in neonates via immunomodulation. A complete review of adjunct immunologic
therapies in neonatal sepsis, see the article by Tarnow-Mordi and colleagues else-
where in this issue for further exploration of this topic.
The outcome of septic shock in the neonate is dismal. One study reported death or
severe sequelae in 52% of infants, with only 28% of infants less than 1000 g alive
and free of disability at 18 months of age.7 Variables predictive of mortality include
cardiac dysfunction manifested as refractory shock, acute renal failure, neutropenia,
increased prothrombin time, excessive bleeding, metabolic acidosis, and
hypothermia.231,297
Neurodevelopmental outcomes following neonatal sepsis, without stratification for
shock, have been studied in some detail and demonstrate significant risk for impair-
ment, particularly in the most premature neonates.298 VLBW infants with sepsis,
compared with those without, have been reported to have significantly increased
mortality (21% vs 9%), longer hospital stay (98 vs 58 days), and a higher risk of chronic
lung disease.31 ELBW infants are at especially high risk for sepsis-associated adverse
neurodevelopmental outcomes, including deafness, cerebral palsy, lower mental and
psychomotor development scores, and vision impairment.299,300 In a study of preterm
infants, white matter abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging at term corrected
age-predicted neurodevelopmental impairment in those with sepsis compared with
those without.301 Surgical NEC, which is often accompanied by SIRS or shock, has
462 Wynn & Wong
FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
Neonatal sepsis requires translational and clinical research. Definitions for the sepsis
continuum and treatment algorithms specific for preterm infants should be developed
to improve the quality of clinical trials and facilitate meta-analyses of prophylactic and
therapeutic interventions. Systems biology and genomic and proteomic studies have
yielded important data on septic shock in older populations304–312 and the use of these
modern techniques in the study of neonatal inflammation and response to pathogen
challenge has begun.109,138,313 With further research, real-time sampling using only
microliters of blood will allow rapid identification of highest-risk patients, pathogen-
specific responses, and sepsis-staging biomarkers.314 Immaturities of immune
function and physiology in the neonate necessitate developmental stage-specific
evaluations of sepsis pathophysiology and treatment. Exploration of adjuvant treat-
ments including LPS-binding proteins (rBPI,315 sCD14, or anti-CD14316), antiinflam-
matory therapies (pentoxifylline,317 nicotinic stimulation,318 statins319), synthetic
host defense peptides (rhSP-D,320 lactoferrin321,322), combination therapies323 (ie,
IVIg and colony-stimulating factor), and innate immune priming using TLR agonists250
may yield improved outcomes. Advances in these areas are urgently needed and are
likely to substantially improve long-term outcomes.
SUMMARY
Neonatal septic shock is a devastating condition associated with high morbidity and
mortality, Definitions for the sepsis continuum and treatment algorithms specific for
premature neonates are needed to improve studies of septic shock and assess benefit
from clinical interventions. Unique features of the immature immune system and path-
ophysiologic responses to sepsis, particularly those of extremely preterm infants,
necessitate that clinical trials consider them as a separate group. Keen clinical suspi-
cion and knowledge of risk factors will help to identify those neonates at greatest risk
for development of septic shock. Genomic and proteomic approaches, particularly
those that use very small sample volumes, will increase our understanding of the path-
ophysiology and direct the development of novel agents for prevention and treatment
of severe sepsis and shock in the neonate. Although at present antimicrobial therapy
and supportive care remain the foundation of treatment, in the future immunomodula-
tory agents are likely to improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Associate Professor C. Michael Cotten, MD, MHS for his review
of this manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?
Lancet 2005;365(9462):891–900.
2. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Changes in pathogens causing early-
onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002;347(4):240–7.
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 463
3. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight
neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics
2002;110(2 Pt 1):285–91.
4. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Higgins RD, et al. Very low birth weight preterm infants
with early onset neonatal sepsis: the predominance of Gram-negative infec-
tions continues in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Develop-
ment Neonatal Research Network, 2002–2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;
24(7):635–9.
5. Haque KN, Khan MA, Kerry S, et al. Pattern of culture-proven neonatal sepsis in
a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2004;25(9):759–64.
6. Haque KN. Defining common infections in children and neonates. J Hosp Infect
2007;65(Suppl 2):110–4.
7. Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Laborie S, Rabilloud M, et al. Outcome and prognostic
factors in neonates with septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9(2):186–91.
8. Furman WL, Menke JA, Barson WJ, et al. Continuous naloxone infusion in two
neonates with septic shock. J Pediatr 1984;105(4):649–51.
9. Togari H, Mikawa M, Iwanaga T, et al. Endotoxin clearance by exchange blood
transfusion in septic shock neonates. Acta Paediatr Scand 1983;72(1):87–91.
10. Fenton LJ, Strunk RC. Complement activation and group B streptococcal infec-
tion in the newborn: similarities to endotoxin shock. Pediatrics 1977;60(6):901–7.
11. Tollner U, Pohlandt F. Septicemia in the newborn due to Gram-negative bacilli.
Risk factors, clinical symptoms, and hematologic changes. Eur J Pediatr
1976;123(4):243–54.
12. Frommhold D, Birle A, Linderkamp O, et al. Drotrecogin alpha (activated) in
neonatal septic shock. Scand J Infect Dis 2005;37(4):306–8.
13. Miyairi I, Berlingieri D, Protic J, et al. Neonatal invasive group A streptococcal
disease: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;
23(2):161–5.
14. Ahmed K, Sein PP, Shahnawaz M, et al. Pasteurella gallinarum neonatal menin-
gitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8(1):55–7.
15. Roll C, Schmid EN, Menken U, et al. Fatal Salmonella enteritidis sepsis acquired
prenatally in a premature infant. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88(4 Pt 2):692–3.
16. Wolfler A, Silvani P, Musicco M, et al. Incidence of and mortality due to sepsis,
severe sepsis and septic shock in Italian Pediatric Intensive Care Units:
a prospective national survey. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(9):1690–7.
17. Rodriguez-Nunez A, Lopez-Herce J, Gil-Anton J, et al. Rescue treatment with
terlipressin in children with refractory septic shock: a clinical study. Crit Care
2006;10(1):R20.
18. Tourneux P, Rakza T, Abazine A, et al. Noradrenaline for management of septic
shock refractory to fluid loading and dopamine or dobutamine in full-term
newborn infants. Acta Paediatr 2008;97(2):177–80.
19. Filippi L, Poggi C, Serafini L, et al. Terlipressin as rescue treatment of refractory
shock in a neonate. Acta Paediatr 2008;97(4):500–2.
20. Meyer S, Loffler G, Polcher T, et al. Vasopressin in catecholamine-resistant
septic and cardiogenic shock in very-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatr
2006;95(10):1309–12.
21. McAdams RM, Garza-Cox S, Yoder BA. Early-onset neonatal pneumococcal
sepsis syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6(5):595–7.
22. Matok I, Leibovitch L, Vardi A, et al. Terlipressin as rescue therapy for intractable
hypotension during neonatal septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004;5(2):116–8.
464 Wynn & Wong
23. Aikio O, Vuopala K, Pokela ML, et al. Diminished inducible nitric oxide synthase
expression in fulminant early-onset neonatal pneumonia. Pediatrics 2000;
105(5):1013–9.
24. Duke TD, Butt W, South M. Predictors of mortality and multiple organ failure in
children with sepsis. Intensive Care Med 1997;23(6):684–92.
25. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International pediatric sepsis consensus
conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr
Crit Care Med 2005;6(1):2–8.
26. Cayabyab R, McLean CW, Seri I. Definition of hypotension and assessment of
hemodynamics in the preterm neonate. J Perinatol 2009;29(Suppl 2):S58–62.
27. Shah GS, Budhathoki S, Das BK, et al. Risk factors in early neonatal sepsis.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2006;4(2):187–91.
28. Salem SY, Sheiner E, Zmora E, et al. Risk factors for early neonatal sepsis. Arch
Gynecol Obstet 2006;274(4):198–202.
29. Yancey MK, Duff P, Kubilis P, et al. Risk factors for neonatal sepsis. Obstet
Gynecol 1996;87(2):188–94.
30. Benitz WE, Gould JB, Druzin ML. Risk factors for early-onset group B strepto-
coccal sepsis: estimation of odds ratios by critical literature review. Pediatrics
1999;103(6):e77.
31. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, et al. Incidence, presenting features, risk
factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants.
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal
Research Network. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17(7):593–8.
32. Schuchat A, Zywicki SS, Dinsmoor MJ, et al. Risk factors and opportunities for
prevention of early-onset neonatal sepsis: a multicenter case-control study.
Pediatrics 2000;105(1 Pt 1):21–6.
33. Escobar GJ, Li DK, Armstrong MA, et al. Neonatal sepsis workups in infants
>/52000 grams at birth: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2000;106(2 Pt
1):256–63.
34. Sharma R, Tepas JJ 3rd, Hudak ML, et al. Neonatal gut barrier and multiple
organ failure: role of endotoxin and proinflammatory cytokines in sepsis and
necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42(3):454–61.
35. Sonntag J, Wagner MH, Waldschmidt J, et al. Multisystem organ failure and
capillary leak syndrome in severe necrotizing enterocolitis of very low birth
weight infants. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33(3):481–4.
36. Dahmer MK, Randolph A, Vitali S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in sepsis.
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6(Suppl 3):S61–73.
37. Cogulu O, Onay H, Uzunkaya D, et al. Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme
gene polymorphisms in children with sepsis and septic shock. Pediatr Int
2008;50(4):477–80.
38. Lyons EJ, Amos W, Berkley JA, et al. Homozygosity and risk of childhood death
due to invasive bacterial disease. BMC Med Genet 2009;10:55.
39. Liangos O, Jaber BL. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children with
sepsis: role of genetic factors. Semin Nephrol 2008;28(5):499–509.
40. Kumpf O, Schumann RR. Genetic influence on bloodstream infections and
sepsis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008;32(Suppl 1):S44–50.
41. Sutherland AM, Walley KR. Bench-to-bedside review: association of genetic
variation with sepsis. Crit Care 2009;13(2):210.
42. Ahrens P, Kattner E, Kohler B, et al. Mutations of genes involved in the innate
immune system as predictors of sepsis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr
Res 2004;55(4):652–6.
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 465
43. Baier RJ, Loggins J, Yanamandra K. IL-10, IL-6 and CD14 polymorphisms
and sepsis outcome in ventilated very low birth weight infants. BMC Med
2006;4:10.
44. Chauhan M, McGuire W. Interleukin-6 (-174C) polymorphism and the risk of
sepsis in very low birth weight infants: meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 2008;93(6):F427–9.
45. Dzwonek AB, Neth OW, Thiebaut R, et al. The role of mannose-binding lectin in
susceptibility to infection in preterm neonates. Pediatr Res 2008;63(6):680–5.
46. Gopel W, Hartel C, Ahrens P, et al. Interleukin-6-174-genotype, sepsis and cere-
bral injury in very low birth weight infants. Genes Immun 2006;7(1):65–8.
47. Hartel C, Rupp J, Hoegemann A, et al. 159C>T CD14 genotype–functional
effects on innate immune responses in term neonates. Hum Immunol 2008;
69(6):338–43.
48. Hartel C, Schultz C, Herting E, et al. Genetic association studies in VLBW infants
exemplifying susceptibility to sepsis–recent findings and implications for future
research. Acta Paediatr 2007;96(2):158–65.
49. Hubacek JA, Stuber F, Frohlich D, et al. Gene variants of the bactericidal/perme-
ability increasing protein and lipopolysaccharide binding protein in sepsis
patients: gender-specific genetic predisposition to sepsis. Crit Care Med
2001;29(3):557–61.
50. Mollen KP, Gribar SC, Anand RJ, et al. Increased expression and internalization
of the endotoxin coreceptor CD14 in enterocytes occur as an early event in the
development of experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg 2008;
43(6):1175–81.
51. Reiman M, Kujari H, Ekholm E, et al. Interleukin-6 polymorphism is associated
with chorioamnionitis and neonatal infections in preterm infants. J Pediatr
2008;153(1):19–24.
52. Schueller AC, Heep A, Kattner E, et al. Prevalence of two tumor necrosis factor
gene polymorphisms in premature infants with early onset sepsis. Biol Neonate
2006;90(4):229–32.
53. Treszl A, Heninger E, Kalman A, et al. Lower prevalence of IL-4 receptor alpha-
chain gene G variant in very-low-birth-weight infants with necrotizing enteroco-
litis. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38(9):1374–8.
54. Treszl A, Kocsis I, Szathmari M, et al. Genetic variants of TNF-[FC12]a, IL-1beta,
IL-4 receptor [FC12]a-chain, IL-6 and IL-10 genes are not risk factors for sepsis
in low-birth-weight infants. Biol Neonate 2003;83(4):241–5.
55. Treszl A, Kocsis I, Szathmari M, et al. Genetic variants of the tumour necrosis
factor-alpha promoter gene do not influence the development of necrotizing
enterocolitis. Acta Paediatr 2001;90(10):1182–5.
56. Treszl A, Tulassay T, Vasarhelyi B. Genetic basis for necrotizing enterocolitis–risk
factors and their relations to genetic polymorphisms. Front Biosci 2006;11:
570–80.
57. Verboon-Maciolek MA, Krediet TG, Gerards LJ, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic
characteristics of viral infections in a neonatal intensive care unit during a 12-
year period. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24(10):901–4.
58. Verboon-Maciolek MA, Krediet TG, Gerards LJ, et al. Severe neonatal parecho-
virus infection and similarity with enterovirus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008;
27(3):241–5.
59. Kawada J, Kimura H, Ito Y, et al. Evaluation of systemic inflammatory
responses in neonates with herpes simplex virus infection. J Infect Dis 2004;
190(3):494–8.
466 Wynn & Wong
60. Karlowicz MG, Buescher ES, Surka AE. Fulminant late-onset sepsis in a neonatal
intensive care unit, 1988–1997, and the impact of avoiding empiric vancomycin
therapy. Pediatrics 2000;106(6):1387–90.
61. Hyde TB, Hilger TM, Reingold A, et al. Trends in incidence and antimicrobial resis-
tance of early-onset sepsis: population-based surveillance in San Francisco and
Atlanta. Pediatrics 2002;110(4):690–5.
62. Benjamin DK, DeLong E, Cotten CM, et al. Mortality following blood culture in
premature infants: increased with Gram-negative bacteremia and candidemia,
but not Gram-positive bacteremia. J Perinatol 2004;24(3):175–80.
63. Benjamin DK Jr, Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA, et al. Neonatal candidiasis among
extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodeve-
lopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics 2006;117(1):84–92.
64. Schelonka RL, Chai MK, Yoder BA, et al. Volume of blood required to detect
common neonatal pathogens. J Pediatr 1996;129(2):275–8.
65. Kawai T, Akira S. The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition. Int
Immunol 2009;21(4):317–37.
66. Kumagai Y, Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pathogen recognition by innate receptors.
J Infect Chemother 2008;14(2):86–92.
67. Trinchieri G, Sher A. Cooperation of Toll-like receptor signals in innate immune
defence. Nat Rev Immunol 2007;7(3):179–90.
68. Rittirsch D, Flierl MA, Ward PA. Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis. Nat
Rev Immunol 2008;8(10):776–87.
69. Krumbiegel D, Zepp F, Meyer CU. Combined Toll-like receptor agonists syner-
gistically increase production of inflammatory cytokines in human neonatal
dendritic cells. Hum Immunol 2007;68(10):813–22.
70. Bochud PY, Chien JW, Marr KA, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms and
aspergillosis in stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2008;359(17):
1766–77.
71. Wurfel MM, Gordon AC, Holden TD, et al. Toll-like receptor 1 polymorphisms
affect innate immune responses and outcomes in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 2008;178(7):710–20.
72. Agnese DM, Calvano JE, Hahm SJ, et al. Human toll-like receptor 4 mutations
but not CD14 polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of Gram-
negative infections. J Infect Dis 2002;186(10):1522–5.
73. Lorenz E, Mira JP, Cornish KL, et al. A novel polymorphism in the toll-like
receptor 2 gene and its potential association with staphylococcal infection.
Infect Immun 2000;68(11):6398–401.
74. Zhang SY, Jouanguy E, Ugolini S, et al. TLR3 deficiency in patients with herpes
simplex encephalitis. Science 2007;317(5844):1522–7.
75. Mockenhaupt FP, Cramer JP, Hamann L, et al. Toll-like receptor (TLR) polymor-
phisms in African children: common TLR-4 variants predispose to severe
malaria. J Commun Dis 2006;38(3):230–45.
76. Faber J, Meyer CU, Gemmer C, et al. Human toll-like receptor 4 mutations are
associated with susceptibility to invasive meningococcal disease in infancy.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25(1):80–1.
77. Zhang JP, Chen C, Yang Y. [Changes and clinical significance of Toll-like
receptor 2 and 4 expression in neonatal infections]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi
2007;45(2):130–3 [in Chinese].
78. Leaphart CL, Cavallo J, Gribar SC, et al. A critical role for TLR4 in the pathogen-
esis of necrotizing enterocolitis by modulating intestinal injury and repair.
J Immunol 2007;179(7):4808–20.
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 467
98. Kono H, Rock KL. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev
Immunol 2008;8(4):279–89.
99. Batra S, Kumar R, Seema, et al. Alterations in antioxidant status during neonatal
sepsis. Ann Trop Paediatr 2000;20(1):27–33.
100. Kapoor K, Basu S, Das BK, et al. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in neonatal
septicemia. J Trop Pediatr 2006;52(5):372–5.
101. Ng PC. Diagnostic markers of infection in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 2004;89(3):F229–35.
102. Ng PC, Li K, Wong RP, et al. Proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine
responses in preterm infants with systemic infections. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 2003;88(3):F209–13.
103. Levy O, Zarember KA, Roy RM, et al. Selective impairment of TLR-mediated
innate immunity in human newborns: neonatal blood plasma reduces mono-
cyte TNF-alpha induction by bacterial lipopeptides, lipopolysaccharide, and
imiquimod, but preserves the response to R-848. J Immunol 2004;173(7):
4627–34.
104. Bozza FA, Salluh JI, Japiassu AM, et al. Cytokine profiles as markers of disease
severity in sepsis: a multiplex analysis. Crit Care 2007;11(2):R49.
105. Hodge G, Hodge S, Haslam R, et al. Rapid simultaneous measurement of
multiple cytokines using 100 microl sample volumes–association with neonatal
sepsis. Clin Exp Immunol 2004;137(2):402–7.
106. Heper Y, Akalin EH, Mistik R, et al. Evaluation of serum C-reactive protein, pro-
calcitonin, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-10 levels as diagnostic
and prognostic parameters in patients with community-acquired sepsis,
severe sepsis, and septic shock. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;25(8):
481–91.
107. Atici A, Satar M, Cetiner S, et al. Serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha in neonatal
sepsis. Am J Perinatol 1997;14(7):401–4.
108. Sadeghi K, Berger A, Langgartner M, et al. Immaturity of infection control in
preterm and term newborns is associated with impaired toll-like receptor
signaling. J Infect Dis 2007;195(2):296–302.
109. Kingsmore SF, Kennedy N, Halliday HL, et al. Identification of diagnostic
biomarkers for infection in premature neonates. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008;
7(10):1863–75.
110. Grobmyer SR, Lin E, Lowry SF, et al. Elevation of IL-18 in human sepsis. J Clin
Immunol 2000;20(3):212–5.
111. Hirata J, Kotani J, Aoyama M, et al. A role for IL-18 in human neutrophil
apoptosis. Shock 2008;30(6):628–33.
112. Cusumano V, Midiri A, Cusumano VV, et al. Interleukin-18 is an essential element
in host resistance to experimental group B streptococcal disease in neonates.
Infect Immun 2004;72(1):295–300.
113. Puren AJ, Fantuzzi G, Gu Y, et al. Interleukin-18 (IFNgamma-inducing factor)
induces IL-8 and IL-1beta via TNFalpha production from non-CD141 human
blood mononuclear cells. J Clin Invest 1998;101(3):711–21.
114. Elbim C, Guichard C, Dang PM, et al. Interleukin-18 primes the oxidative burst of
neutrophils in response to formyl-peptides: role of cytochrome b558 transloca-
tion and N-formyl peptide receptor endocytosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005;
12(3):436–46.
115. Dollner H, Vatten L, Austgulen R. Early diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis:
comparing C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, soluble tumour necrosis factor recep-
tors and soluble adhesion molecules. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54(12):1251–7.
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 469
135. Koj A. Termination of acute-phase response: role of some cytokines and anti-
inflammatory drugs. Gen Pharmacol 1998;31(1):9–18.
136. Spear ML, Stefano JL, Fawcett P, et al. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor as
a predictor of neonatal sepsis. J Pediatr 1995;126(6):982–5.
137. Dollner H, Vatten L, Linnebo I, et al. Inflammatory mediators in umbilical
plasma from neonates who develop early-onset sepsis. Biol Neonate 2001;
80(1):41–7.
138. Buhimschi CS, Bhandari V, Han YW, et al. Using proteomics in perinatal and
neonatal sepsis: hopes and challenges for the future. Curr Opin Infect Dis
2009;22(3):235–43.
139. Bopp C, Hofer S, Weitz J, et al. sRAGE is elevated in septic patients and asso-
ciated with patients outcome. J Surg Res 2008;147(1):79–83.
140. Liliensiek B, Weigand MA, Bierhaus A, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation
end products (RAGE) regulates sepsis but not the adaptive immune response.
J Clin Invest 2004;113(11):1641–50.
141. Wolach B, Dolfin T, Regev R, et al. The development of the complement system
after 28 weeks’ gestation. Acta Paediatr 1997;86(5):523–7.
142. Notarangelo LD, Chirico G, Chiara A, et al. Activity of classical and alternative
pathways of complement in preterm and small for gestational age infants.
Pediatr Res 1984;18(3):281–5.
143. Drossou V, Kanakoudi F, Diamanti E, et al. Concentrations of main serum opso-
nins in early infancy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995;72(3):F172–5.
144. Miller ME, Stiehm ER. Phagocytic, opsonic and immunoglobulin studies in
newborns. Calif Med 1973;119(2):43–63.
145. Nupponen I, Andersson S, Jarvenpaa AL, et al. Neutrophil CD11b expression
and circulating interleukin-8 as diagnostic markers for early-onset neonatal
sepsis. Pediatrics 2001;108(1):E12.
146. Berger M, O’Shea J, Cross AS, et al. Human neutrophils increase expression of
C3bi as well as C3b receptors upon activation. J Clin Invest 1984;74(5):1566–71.
147. Snyderman R, Goetzl EJ. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of leukocyte
chemotaxis. Science 1981;213(4510):830–7.
148. Vogt W. Anaphylatoxins: possible roles in disease. Complement 1986;3(3):
177–88.
149. Ehlers MR. CR3: a general purpose adhesion-recognition receptor essential for
innate immunity. Microbes Infect 2000;2(3):289–94.
150. Markiewski MM, Lambris JD. The role of complement in inflammatory diseases
from behind the scenes into the spotlight. Am J Pathol 2007;171(3):715–27.
151. Nybo M, Sorensen O, Leslie R, et al. Reduced expression of C5a receptors on
neutrophils from cord blood. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;78(2):
F129–32.
152. Lothian C, Dahlgren C, Lagercrantz H, et al. Different expression and mobilisa-
tion of the complement regulatory proteins CD35, CD55 and CD59 in neonatal
and adult neutrophils. Biol Neonate 1997;72(1):15–21.
153. Castellheim A, Lindenskov PH, Pharo A, et al. Meconium aspiration syndrome
induces complement-associated systemic inflammatory response in newborn
piglets. Scand J Immunol 2005;61(3):217–25.
154. Wong HR, Doughty LA, Wedel N, et al. Plasma bactericidal/permeability-
increasing protein concentrations in critically ill children with the sepsis
syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995;14(12):1087–91.
155. Levy O. Innate immunity of the newborn: basic mechanisms and clinical corre-
lates. Nat Rev Immunol 2007;7(5):379–90.
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 471
156. Levy O, Martin S, Eichenwald E, et al. Impaired innate immunity in the newborn:
newborn neutrophils are deficient in bactericidal/permeability-increasing
protein. Pediatrics 1999;104(6):1327–33.
157. Michalek J, Svetlikova P, Fedora M, et al. Bactericidal permeability increasing
protein gene variants in children with sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2007;33(12):
2158–64.
158. Dyke MP, Forsyth KD. Decreased plasma fibronectin concentrations in preterm
infants with septicaemia. Arch Dis Child 1993;68(5 Spec No):557–60.
159. Romeo MG, Tina LG, Sciacca A, et al. [Decreased plasma fibronectin (pFN)
level in preterm infants with infections]. Pediatr Med Chir 1995;17(6):563–6 [in
Italian].
160. Kalayci AG, Adam B, Yilmazer F, et al. The value of immunoglobulin and
complement levels in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Acta Paediatr
1997;86(9):999–1002.
161. Madden NP, Levinsky RJ, Bayston R, et al. Surgery, sepsis, and nonspecific
immune function in neonates. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24(6):562–6.
162. Hathaway WE, Mull MM, Pechet GS. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in
the newborn. Pediatrics 1969;43(2):233–40.
163. Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Jacobs RF, et al. Natural history of neonatal herpes
simplex virus infections in the acyclovir era. Pediatrics 2001;108(2):223–9.
164. Rivers RP, Cattermole HE, Wright I. The expression of surface tissue factor apo-
protein by blood monocytes in the course of infections in early infancy. Pediatr
Res 1992;31(6):567–73.
165. Markiewski MM, Nilsson B, Ekdahl KN, et al. Complement and coagulation:
strangers or partners in crime? Trends Immunol 2007;28(4):184–92.
166. Aronis S, Platokouki H, Photopoulos S, et al. Indications of coagulation and/or
fibrinolytic system activation in healthy and sick very-low-birth-weight neonates.
Biol Neonate 1998;74(5):337–44.
167. Lauterbach R, Pawlik D, Radziszewska R, et al. Plasma antithrombin III and
protein C levels in early recognition of late-onset sepsis in newborns. Eur J Pe-
diatr 2006;165(9):585–9.
168. Roman J, Velasco F, Fernandez F, et al. Coagulation, fibrinolytic and kallikrein
systems in neonates with uncomplicated sepsis and septic shock. Haemostasis
1993;23(3):142–8.
169. Venkataseshan S, Dutta S, Ahluwalia J, et al. Low plasma protein C values
predict mortality in low birth weight neonates with septicemia. Pediatr Infect
Dis J 2007;26(8):684–8.
170. Sola MC, Del Vecchio A, Rimsza LM. Evaluation and treatment of thrombocyto-
penia in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol 2000;27(3):655–79.
171. Guida JD, Kunig AM, Leef KH, et al. Platelet count and sepsis in very low birth
weight neonates: is there an organism-specific response? Pediatrics 2003;
111(6 Pt 1):1411–5.
172. Finkelstein Y, Shenkman B, Sirota L, et al. Whole blood platelet deposition on
extracellular matrix under flow conditions in preterm neonatal sepsis. Eur J
Pediatr 2002;161(5):270–4.
173. Bednarek FJ, Bean S, Barnard MR, et al. The platelet hyporeactivity of extremely
low birth weight neonates is age-dependent. Thromb Res 2009;124(1):42–5.
174. Urlichs F, Speer C. Neutrophil function in preterm and term infants. Neoreviews
2004;5:e417–30.
175. Marodi L. Innate cellular immune responses in newborns. Clin Immunol 2006;
118(2–3):137–44.
472 Wynn & Wong
297. Mathur NB, Singh A, Sharma VK, et al. Evaluation of risk factors for fatal neonatal
sepsis. Indian Pediatr 1996;33(10):817–22.
298. Adams-Chapman I, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infection and long-term neurodeve-
lopmental outcome in the preterm infant. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006;19(3):
290–7.
299. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth
impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection.
JAMA 2004;292(19):2357–65.
300. Bassler D, Stoll BJ, Schmidt B, et al. Using a count of neonatal morbidities to
predict poor outcome in extremely low birth weight infants: added role of
neonatal infection. Pediatrics 2009;123(1):313–8.
301. Shah DK, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ, et al. Adverse neurodevelopment in preterm
infants with postnatal sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis is mediated by white
matter abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging at term. J Pediatr 2008;
153(2):170–5, 175 e171.
302. Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Stoll BJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth
outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants after necrotizing enterocolitis.
Pediatrics 2005;115(3):696–703.
303. Manzoni P, Maestri A, Leonessa M, et al. Fungal and bacterial sepsis and
threshold ROP in preterm very low birth weight neonates. J Perinatol 2006;
26(1):23–30.
304. Wong HR, Cvijanovich N, Lin R, et al. Identification of pediatric septic shock
subclasses based on genome-wide expression profiling. BMC Med 2009;7:34.
305. Wong HR, Cvijanovich N, Allen GL, et al. Genomic expression profiling across
the pediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic
shock spectrum. Crit Care Med 2009;37(5):1558–66.
306. Wong HR, Odoms K, Sakthivel B. Divergence of canonical danger signals: the
genome-level expression patterns of human mononuclear cells subjected to
heat shock or lipopolysaccharide. BMC Immunol 2008;9:24.
307. Cvijanovich N, Shanley TP, Lin R, et al. Validating the genomic signature of pedi-
atric septic shock. Physiol Genomics 2008;34(1):127–34.
308. Shanley TP, Cvijanovich N, Lin R, et al. Genome-level longitudinal expression of
signaling pathways and gene networks in pediatric septic shock. Mol Med 2007;
13(9–10):495–508.
309. Tang BM, McLean AS, Dawes IW, et al. Gene-expression profiling of Gram-posi-
tive and Gram-negative sepsis in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2008;36(4):
1125–8.
310. Tang BM, McLean AS, Dawes IW, et al. The use of gene-expression profiling to
identify candidate genes in human sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;
176(7):676–84.
311. Tang BM, McLean AS, Dawes IW, et al. Gene-expression profiling of peripheral
blood mononuclear cells in sepsis. Crit Care Med 2009;37(3):882–8.
312. Karvunidis T, Mares J, Thongboonkerd V, et al. Recent progress of proteomics in
critical illness. Shock 2009;31(6):545–52.
313. Buhimschi CS, Bhandari V, Hamar BD, et al. Proteomic profiling of the amniotic fluid
to detect inflammation, infection, and neonatal sepsis. PLoS Med 2007;4(1):e18.
314. Feezor RJ, Cheng A, Paddock HN, et al. Functional genomics and gene expres-
sion profiling in sepsis: beyond class prediction. Clin Infect Dis 2005;
41(Suppl 7):S427–35.
315. Levy O, Sisson RB, Kenyon J, et al. Enhancement of neonatal innate defense:
effects of adding an N-terminal recombinant fragment of bactericidal/
Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates 479