Porter's Generic Strategies (Business Level/ Competitive) :: I. Differentiation Strategy
Porter's Generic Strategies (Business Level/ Competitive) :: I. Differentiation Strategy
Porter's Generic Strategies (Business Level/ Competitive) :: I. Differentiation Strategy
i. In the Differentiation Strategy, the firm seeks to be unique in its industry. This is
the strategy in which an organization seeks to distinguish itself from competitors
through the quality of its products or services. Firms that successfully implement a
differentiation strategy are able to charge more than competitors because
customers are willing to pay more to obtain the extra value they perceive. Apple,
Rolex.
ii. Cost Leadership Strategy means becoming the low – cost leader in an industry.
This is the strategy in which an organization attempts to gain a competitive
advantage by reducing its costs below the costs of competing firms. Bangladesh is
the best example for cost leadership in RMG sector, Symphony is another example
in mobile phone sector.
iii. Niche means tergeting on specific customers or region where other competitors do
not go or do not target. This is the strategy in which an organization concentrates
on a specific regional market, product line, or group of buyers. Example: Nike
target on athletes, Easy brand target on young generation.
Corporate-Level Strategy is the strategy that determines what businesses a
company is in or wants to be in, and what it wants to do with those businesses. It’s based
on the mission and goals of the organization and the roles that each business unit of the
organization will play. The decisions about which businesses, industries, and markets an
organization will enter and how to manage these different businesses are based on an
organization’s corporate strategy.
First, workers performing small, simple tasks will become very proficient at each
task.
Second, transfer time between tasks decreases. If employees perform several
different tasks, some time is lost as they stop doing the first task and start doing
the next.
Third, the more narrowly defined a job is, the easier it is to develop specializedm
equipment to assist with that job.
Fourth, when an employee who performs a highly specialized job is absent or
resigns, the manager is able to train someone new at relatively low cost.
Limitations of Specialization: On the other hand, job specialization can have negative
consequences. The foremost criticism is that workers who perform highly specialized
jobs may become bored and dissatisfied. The job may be so specialized that it offers no
challenge or stimulation. Boredom and monotony set in, absenteeism rises, and the
quality of the work may suffer. Furthermore, the anticipated benefits of specialization do
not always occur.
Alternatives to Specialization: To counter the problems associated with
specialization, managers have sought other approaches to job design that achieve a better
balance between organizational demands for efficiency and productivity and individual
needs for creativity and autonomy. Five alternative approaches are job rotation, job
enlargement, job enrichment, job characteristics approach, and work teams.
Job Rotation involves systematically moving employees from one job to another.
Job rotation means systematically moving workers from one job to another.
When incumbents become bored with routine jobs, job rotation is an answer to it.
Here jobs remain unchanged, but the incumbents shift from one job to another.
On the positive side, it increases the intrinsic reward potential of a job because of
the different skills and abilities needed to perform it. Workers become more competent in
several jobs, know a variety of jobs, and improve the self-image, personal growth.
Job Enlargement was developed to increase the total number of tasks workers
perform. As a result, all workers perform a wide variety of tasks, which presumably
reduces the level of job dissatisfaction.
Job enlargement means assigning workers additional same-level activities. Job
enlargement changes the jobs to include more and/or different tasks. It refers expanding
the number of tasks or duties assigned to a given job. Job enlargement is naturally
opposite to work simplification.
Job Enrichment means redesigning jobs in a way that increases the opportunities for
the worker to experience feelings of responsibility, achievement, growth, and recognition.
It assumes that increasing the range and variety of tasks is not sufficient by itself to
improve employee motivation. Thus, job enrichment attempts to increase both the
number of tasks a worker does and the control the worker has over the job. To implement
job enrichment, managers remove some controls from the job, delegate more authority to
employees and structure the work in complete, natural units. These changes increase
subordinates’ sense of responsibility. Another part of job enrichment is to continually
assign new and challenging tasks, thereby increasing employees’ opportunity for growth
and advancement.
An enriched job will have more responsibility, more autonomy (vertical enrichment),
and more variety of tasks (horizontal enrichment) and more growth opportunities. The
employee does more planning and controlling with less supervision but more self-
evaluation.
The Job Characteristics Approach is an alternative to job specialization that does
take into account the work system and employee preferences. The job characteristics
approach suggests that jobs should be diagnosed and improved along five core
dimensions:
1. Skill variety: The number of things a person does in a job
2. Task identity: The extent to which the worker does a complete or identifiable portion
of the total job
3. Task significance: The perceived importance of the task
4. Autonomy: The degree of control the worker has over how the work is performed
5. Feedback: The extent to which the worker knows how well the job is being performed
Strategic Plan is a general plan outlining decision about resource allocation,
priorities, and action steps necessary to reach strategic goals. These plans are set by the
board of directors and top management, generally have an extended time horizon, and
address questions of scope, resource deployment, competitive advantage, and synergy.
Total Quality Management involves designing and developing new systems and
processes and ensures effective coordination among various departments. New Processes
are developed based on various customer feedbacks and researches.
The main focus of Total quality management is to maintain existing quality
standards whereas Six Sigma primarily focuses on making small necessary changes
in the processes and systems to ensure high quality.
The process of Total quality management involves improvement in existing policies and
procedures to ensure high quality. Six-Sigma focuses on improving quality by
minimizing and eventually eliminating defects from the system. The process of total
Quality management ensures that every single member associated with the organization
is working towards the improvement of existing processes, systems, services and work
culture for long term quality products/services. Six Sigma, on the other hand focuses on
first identifying and eventually removing various defects and obstacles which might
come in the way of organization’s success.
“Kaizen” refers to a Japanese word which means “improvement” or “change for the
better”. Kaizen is defined as a continuous effort by each and every employee (from the
CEO to field staff) to ensure improvement of all processes and systems of a particular
organization.
Implementing Kaizen tools is not the responsibility of a single individual but involves
every member who is directly associated with the organization. Every individual,
irrespective of his/her designation or level in the hierarchy needs to contribute by
incorporating small improvements and changes in the system.