Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Literature review
2.1 Introduction
The purpose of this study is to test out the feasibility of teaching grammar
structures explicitly to students in order for them to be able to apply the knowledge in
their writing. For this chapter, the researcher will explain the 1) concepts which
provide the basis for this research; 2) theories, frameworks and models of second
2.2 Concepts
operated simultaneously with actions which is coordinated with that of a response from
there is a purpose and language is used to transmit that purpose. For most of us,
communication generally takes place when we are able to speak and express ourselves
orally with our surrounding; using the languages that we are comfortable with in doing
so. Although it is undeniable that there are many other forms of communication which
human beings are able to use, yet the aptitude of speaking is often linked to
1
language that we have with our family members, technological gadgets and social
surrounding since birth. This speaking function in second language acquisition paradigm
is measured through the performance and ability of the second language learner.
Performance are thought to be the actual instances of language use in real time
(McNamara, 1996), which is a produced function that can be observed. Many researchers
such as Bachman (1990), Davies (1989) and Canale (1983) have given similar
learners. However, this speaking performance are usually affected by many internal (such
Figure 1 shows a summary of the mentioned reasons which can affect the performance of
L2 students.
In this study, the speaking performance focuses more towards students ability to
use again the vocabulary heard and verbalized through singing when they speak with
their friends. Since it is assumed that students already have learnt the vocabulary used in
daily communication, they should already have knowledge on the words they have been
exposed to. This vocabulary knowledge is divided into receptive and productive
2
Figure 1 Summary of reasons affecting language use. Taken from Language testing in
practice by L. F. Bachman, & A. S. Palmer (1996), p. 63.
Individuals who are able to speak need vocabulary to justify their exact
feelings and send across meanings during communication (Bachman & Palmer, 1996;
Carroll, 1968; Meara, 1996). There have been many studies done towards vocabulary
1993; Nakamura, 2004 & Singleton, 1997). Because of that, many language researchers
3
have begun to shift their focus from analyzing language learning structures to vocabulary
building (Meara, 2002). This interest is possibly stemmed from the fact that language
theorists are now concentrating on the fact that the usage of L2 for communication
input where they can receive, analyze, practice and lastly produce the words.
of the word and understands the meaning when spoken by other people or saw it on
reading materials but could not produce it; whether through writing or speaking (Waring,
1999; Lehr, Osborn & Hiebert, 2004; Webb, 2005; Nation, 2005; Schmitt, 2000). On the
other hand, productive vocabulary is the ability of an individual to use the word when
needed through writing or speaking (Winter, 2010; Zhou, 2010). In most language
receptive vocabulary first before forming their productive vocabulary. The receptive
vocabulary can be learnt through incidental or intentional (Zhou, 2010) from the
communication of an individual with their social units. The formation from receptive to
upon the vocabulary growth which when developed, provides fluency and competency
for the individual. Therefore, it is important for all L2 learners to understand that there
should be no limit towards the receptive vocabulary size (Zhou, 2010) as long as the
individual obtains resources for new words based on what is seen or heard. This
4
awareness brings about another classification of vocabulary knowledge which is the size
and depth.
primary meaning of the words that he/she has (Nakanishi & Shimamoto, 2003; Nation &
Waring, 2007), whereas the depth would be the degree of the student in knowing the
various other meanings of a word besides its primary meaning (Nakanishi & Shimamoto,
especially when some words are missing from the communication or used wrongly. To
test the vocabulary size of a student, there are two established tests available which are
the Eurocentres Vocabulary Size Test 10KA (EVST; Meara and Jones, 1990), and the
Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT; Nation, 1983, 1990). Nonetheless, receptive vocabulary
can only be known by the learners if learners consistently see or hear the word being used
in various contexts; so much so that the word is already automatically within the pool of
words known by the learner. Thus, the words known by learners also depend on the
and possible reasons on their incapability to produce words even if it is simple or new to
them. According to Adams (1980) and Higgs & Clifford (1982), productive vocabulary
would be possible that in this study, the low proficiency students are also being treated at
a beginning level because of their hostile language ability in both receptive and
productive vocabulary. However, instead of have them start all over again at a beginners’
5
level to further enhance their vocabulary size and depth for the ultimate purpose of
frequently used for everyday speaking and communication in order for them to use it
consistently.
two main categories which are high frequency words and low frequency words. High
frequency words are the basic essential words of the language (Nation and Gu, 2007).
These high frequency words which encompass the basic vocabulary is the first step for
individual to learn a language. Understanding where ESL students are starting from will
help in providing the vocabulary needed in order for them to improve and gradually
2006). This is because the vocabulary is an acquired skill and this requires the learner’s
effort to be disciplined and spending time to sustain the learnt vocabulary into their long
term memory in order to retrieve them automatically when needed in any form of
language output. In doing so, the learner must continuously be exposed to the words in
various context and form such as listening, reading, dramatizing to form the association
needed to understand the vocabulary and remember it. Nation (2005) and Stevens, Butler,
and Castellon-Wellington (2000) defined high frequency words as words that occur
they are able to write and speak in comprehensible English. As such, there need a context
6
or situation in the lesson which encourages students to remember and be familiar of using
the vocabulary. Gu (2003) pointed out that vocabulary acquisition is a very learner-
centered activity with the effectiveness of the learner’s strategies depending on his/her
attitude and motivation towards new vocabulary acquisition. This is true because intrinsic
motivation is by far the most important requirement for any form of learning to take
place.
Songs and music always go hand in hand when describing this form of
entertainment. While song is an example of language output where the ideas are written
and the words are sung in a melodious tune, music is the tune itself, usually formed by
various instruments and written in a form of a score to review its balance and
combination (Hawkins, Weston & Swanell, 1992). Thus, it is logical to view this form of
output as an effective tool in introducing new vocabulary to ESL learners. After all,
music has long existed in every culture and that it sometimes became the identity of a
particular society (Kenneally, 2008; Wallin, Merker, & Brown, 2000). From traditional
society and country has their own perception towards the type of music that interests
them. Among these general categories of music, teenagers are more inclined to popular
music. Popular music is known for its various musical genres that appeals to almost
anyone or any group who likes the beat and rhythm to it, garnering large audiences and
sometimes, even forming cults and subcultures (Phillip, 1982). The difference in the
arrangements of instruments, beat and harmony allows this popular music to branch out
7
to various genres, mainly pop, rhythm and blues (R&B), rock, techno and many more.
For this study, three genres will be chosen which are pop, R&B and rock.
Pop music, unlike other genres has no definite definition. It can be understood
as a melody that is distinct which usually interests the youths (Frith, Straw, Street, 2001).
Frith et. al (2001) continued mentioning that pop music began its popularity appeal from
sentimental ballads to gospel and soulful music. Overtime, the score for pop music mixes
with the existing rhythms such as jazz, country, rock and classical to create a variety of
tunes such as dance music, hip-hop music, and rap. On the other hand, R&B evolved
from the African American folk song which is historically created as a comfort towards
most of their predicament as slaves. These folk songs have extremely intense emotion to
it whereby they lyrics usually has sexual references, the pain of betrayal, desertion and
unrequited love. It was not long ago that the rap was also included in R&B, often
depicting anger and frustration especially among young urban African American who
have to deal with issues on ethnicity and rights upon the lifting of the slavery law. Rock
and roll did not grow until the 1960s in the America which focuses on arrangements
using guitar. As the theme often follows the issues faced by the Americans, the lyrics
cover a variety of theme. In the 1960s, rock songs were mainly about the Vietnamese
war; then in 1970s, the occurrences of drugs within the society and the struggle for civil
rights; in the 1980s on famine and poverty issues and lastly, in the 1990s on development
and environment problems. So how does the lyrics and music in a song helps in
productive vocabulary? Various researchers have again combined these two elements and
8
Brain studies on its function and controls have long existed. Today, we know for
the fact that our brain is divided into two hemispheres which are the left and right
hemisphere. The left hemisphere controls the language, arithmetic, and speech while the
right hemisphere controls music, visual patterns and emotional responses (Calvin &
Ojemann, 1994; Cruz-Cruz, 2005; Obarow, 2004; Dehaene, Spelke, Pinel, Stanescu,
Tsivkin, 1999; Taylor & Taylor, 1990). Looking at the function of nature of music, both
hemispheres are being used when music is being used. The left hemisphere is triggered for
language purposes based on the lyrics of the song and vocabulary used while the right
thought then that this process that is going on within the brain can help language learning,
especially in memory retention. This has been proposed by Wallace (1994) where the
repetition of phrases or chunks of words in the lyrics as students sang along can help to
assist them in recalling for the vocabulary when needed. This is highly true by observing
catchy jingles from advertisements that has a high impact on consumers because the
phrases are easy to memorize and recall (Wolfe, 2001; Lake 2002; Allan, 2006). In fact,
Allan (2006) has found that the high tune of the songs can gain attention and thus memory
of someone as the person becomes interested in the song. Many researchers have proven
decrease their affective filter (Krashen, 1982) and engage in the singing-language learning
activity. Researchers such as Abbott (2002) and Medina (1990) believed that songs not
only can motivate students to learn but also ease their fears as they become more focus
towards their content. For L2 students, production of English especially among lower
9
proficiency students is scarce as they lack self confidence. Therefore, songs can be used to
language. Songs develop students' language abilities in listening, speaking, reading, and
writing and can be used to teach sentence patterns, vocabulary, pronunciation, rhythm,
adjective, adverbs, and so on. This has been proven by various studies where they have
concluded the significance of English teaching through music and songs (Beasley &
Chuang, 2006; Lems, 2001, 2002; Mclester, 1999; Silliman, 2002).In his hypothesis
model for learning a language which will be discussed later on in the theory and model
section, Krashen (1982) put forward the notion that in helping a high in anxiety and low in
order for learning to take place. By introducing songs, especially when we sing along to
the lyrics, we not only can gain the students’ self-belief but students will also be exposed
to the culture of the English world where the theme, lyrics and words from the song
students are meaningless if there are no opportunities for students to actively engage in the
language learning (Wilcox, 2000). Therefore, the activities should concentrate on the
language production (Webb, 2005). As such, the usage of music in classroom and
practices. As such, there have been many articles which emphasized the fact that music
can be a stimulus for language usage; especially in speaking when teamed with
10
song translation activities, and various other speaking activities done within a group of
students. Teachers can use music to help stimulate students' imagination and to encourage
them to speak to one another (Marlen, 2006). This alternative methodology has a
convincing substantiation as there are evidences which show music able to trigger and
improve academic skills such as vocabulary and grammar (Jalongo & Bromley, 1984;
Additionally, songs are a good source in exposing students to the cultures where
the song lyrics are targeted to (Yukiko, 1975). Most of the time, the lyrics of a song is
written because of a specific theme or for specific group of people; be it the love songs for
those who are in love or have fallen out of love to aggressive songs which talks about the
challenges in life; any song require a great understanding of a cultural value. This is of
course an important aspect not only as a tool for moral teaching but dwells firmly with the
individuals who have high moral values and are rational in their thinking and ideologies.
Some songs mirrors the deepest emotion of the writer which thus become a possible
source of cultural teaching and exposure for students as the fact of life, further providing
an authentic scenario of the demands of the world beyond the four walls of school.
2.3 Theories
major key points, which are Acquisition-Learning hypothesis, the Monitor hypothesis,
the Natural Order hypothesis, the Input hypothesis, and the Affective filter hypothesis.
11
For this case study, the fourth and fifth hypothesis will be discussed as they are
language acquisition. This means that the input must be meaningful for students before
they are able to be receptive towards it. The focus on teaching within this hypothesis
emphasize on meaning rather than form. Therefore, it is important to have the input a
little bit beyond what the student has already know in order to progress because of the
challenge that they face. Coining it ‘i+1’, Krashen believes that it is a comfortable zone
in encouraging students to learn as the +1 is neither too easy nor too difficult for
students to achieve the next level of acquisition. Since every student has a different i, it
is thus better if the teaching and learning practices center around the natural
communicative input where students can have comprehensible input based on the
speaking should not be taught directly as students will only know when to produce
words to speak once they get enough comprehensible input and are ready to do so.
In that sense, the comprehensible input among friends from the same class will
input can be detrimental if the students pick up the errors among each other (Krashen &
Terrell, 1983). Nonetheless, both researchers have assured that the interlanguage is
12
helpful for students because they are not only exposed to the input but also the skills to
It is important for a student to always learn something when they are low in
anxiety and has minimal defensiveness towards their well being and state of mind as a
learner. Krashen (1987) notes that this affective filter system influences the student’s
readiness on whether they want or need to learn a particular aspect. Students who are
not ready to accept the second language or views learning in a negative way can
should be able to handle the emotions of the students in the class by providing a lot of
motivation which can help in building the self- confidence of the students to learn and
use the second language. The more student use and gain confidence of the second
language, the more they will be confident of themselves in the language which will
decrease their anxiety; helping their acquisition to be easier and progress further.
Both Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and ffective Filter Hypothesis can be summed
up by using Figure 2.
13
2.3.2 The Social Constructivism Theory
order to make sense of the new information being shared with other individuals setting
in. this consistent new information will then be assimilated into their understanding;
further developing their capacity of knowledge (Bruning et al., 1999; M. Cole, 1991;
Eggan & Kauchak, 2004). Social constructivists believe that the process of sharing
may not be possible if left to do it alone (Meter & Stevens, 2000; Greeno et al., 1996).
This is because, learning should be an active process where it demands a lot of thinking
and guessing especially when faced with new items in language learning (Brown et
al.1989; Ackerman 1996). In short, the society and culture of the individual which will
affect the understanding and knowledge as they interact with each other sets the basis
or foundation for the individual to further construct and build knowledge (Ernest 1991;
Prawat and Floden 1994). McMahon (1997) who believes that learning is a social
process justifies that our mind is not just developments within ourselves; holistically,
emotionally, spiritually but through socializing which is very much the external factors.
relationship between the student and the instructor in the learning process (Lin, 2008).
By saying that, an individual will then have to understand that social interaction should
14
(Vygotsky,1978). Long (1981) came up with his Social Interaction Model which
highlights the fact that comprehensible input can be achieved when there is modified
the interaction and communication among the teacher and classmates is important (Holt
and Willard-Holt 2000). A second language teacher would have to be able to juggle
when discussion happens (Archee and Duin 1995; Brown et al. 1989). This is because
each individual, be it the teacher or the classmate would possibly have a different
viewpoint and perspective towards the same situation, problem and context.
Nonetheless, as the teacher and everyone from different background, level of English
and understanding discuss verbally on the issue, the interaction will be dynamic (Lin,
2008). Those who are of more competent level in the target language usually tends to
modify their sentences and structures in order to be understood by the weaker students.
The benefit of such method in learning is that the people within the class will learn to
respect and build an objective or subjective viewpoint based on their discussion and
acceptance towards the content learnt (Savery 1994). This is especially important to
remember as teaching of English especially as a second language, it does not only mean
teaching the paradigms but also the parameters of the language; which means the
cultural factor and sociolinguistic aspects which might be of an opposite end compared
15
2.3.2.2 Zone of Proximal Development
known as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). ZPD is defined by the man
through problem solving under adult guidance, or in collaboration with more capable
peers’ (p. 86). He proposed that the difference of what the child already knows from the
peers or with the teacher. Figure 3 shows the ZPD from the perspective of the student.
Thus, teachers and more competent peers will help increase the area of ZPD. This help
constructivists.
16
Not to be misunderstood to be similar with Krashen’s i + 1 hypothesis, ZPD
needs collaboration to perform while Krashen’s i + 1 is more focus towards the level of
competence (i) where the student is at and the acquisition (+1) thereafter in a natural
order. Therefore, ‘i+1 is a metaphor of the language input quality and its effect on
language acquisition’ while ZPD is the development through strings of activities and
(McMahon 1997) is assumed that there should be ‘no one set of generalised learning
laws with each law applying to all domains (Di Vesta, 1987, p.208). The context should
be closest to real life situations to ‘enculturate students into authentic practices through
activity and social interaction in a way similar to that evident, and evidently successful,
distinguish knowledge per se especially in language learning. How can teachers teach
the language without giving examples and, by using examples, the teacher needs to
search for a content that is understandable for the student. Thus, the teaching should be
students. (McMahon 1997; Di Vesta 1987; Li, 2008). As such, the task should only be a
little beyond the knowledge of the student in order to motivate them besides allowing
them to absorb the new knowledge which is what ZPD focuses on. To assimilate this
understanding into teaching practice, the student should be taught by laying out the
17
basics for a topic or theme before continuously revisiting it to expand the knowledge
The output hypothesis was brought forward by Swain (1985) who believes that language
learning will take place if a student writes or speaks. As the students get the hang of producing in
the target language more frequently, automaticity in using the language will be there (Swain,
1993). The key factor in output hypothesis is that Swain believes students will notice every word
they use in order to provide a meaning for their output (Figure 4). By consciously noticing and
allowing the students to play with words that they have learnt in gaining the best message sent
across to their listener, students will be able to form their own language rules and parameters
which will then help them in achieving automaticity and becoming more fluent. During the
process of noticing their words used in their output, they are able to reflect upon their interactions
with their peers which helps in developing their output scheme to be as perfect as possible. The
most important and distinguished component of the output hypothesis compared to the other
models and hypothesis is the existence of feedback. Feedback through speaking is usually
immediate which allows students to alter their production syntax to be comprehensible and
18
2.4 Review of past researches
There are various researchers who have done studies on various contexts or
language learning using music/ song in promoting speaking skill. According to Winter
(2010), there have been multiple studies done in finding the connection between music
The first case study which was done regarding this area was by Medina (1990)
and Cruz-Cruz (2005). Medina (1990) studied on the music’s affects on second grade
English Language Learner’s vocabulary acquisition. She noticed that the combination
of music and illustrations during instruction resulted in the largest vocabulary growth
(Medina, 1990). Based on this study, Obarow (2004) had also done a research that
mirrors Medina and found that her findings are also similar to that of Medina’s. Both
researchers found that using music in conjunction with visuals can increase motivation
and may be a valuable instructional tool to aid in academic growth. Cruz-Cruz (2005)
used songs in teaching grammar and found that songs and music are beneficial for
vocabulary and grammar instruction. Schon, et al. (2008) had also conducted a study on
comparing the spoken sequences with versus sung from the song. They found that
language is learnt if the students are motivated to produce words when the conditions
for emotional/ arousal and linguistic functions are fulfilled. Morales (2007) in his study
argues that the usage of songs are beneficial as students will grow accustom in reading
the lyrics and clarifying the pronunciation where they can clear any doubts if any
towards the production of the words. However, the ability for students to pick up the
linguistic components of the target language based on songs also depended on their
19
the language components and form organized production when needed (Levelt, 1993).
students to develop their oral production. Monsalve & Correal (2006) have revealed in
their study that children's oral production can possibly be the efforts of the teacher ‘to
provide children with topics and activities closely related to the students' particular
interests and needs’. Students are challenged in a fun way to be able to produce the L2
Figure 5 shows the framework of the researcher for this case study which
combines all the theories and concepts to produce the desired outcome.
Comprehensible Input
(songs) 1
Existing Knowledge
Within
1 Krashen’s Input
ZPD – Interaction with teachers
Hypothesis
and competent
Noticing & peers 3
2 Krashen’s
Reflecting 4 Affective Filter
Hypothesis
3 Social
Constructivism
Theory
Learner able to
4 Swain’s Output
speak in English
20
From Figure 5, the framework is a mash up of 3 main theories discussed in this
case study which are Krashen’s Input and Affective Filter Hypotheses, Swain’s Output
Hypothesis and Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development. The song used as the
Independent Variable in this case study is the comprehensible input given to the students.
These songs will help to lower the affective filter which have been described earlier as
mood setter and decreasing the level of anxiety among students, help students to learn by
motivating them to listen and engage in the new vocabulary. The new knowledge gained
through listening to the songs are then internalized within the students as they reflect on
their own what they have learnt and understood. Then, through further communication
with teachers and more competent peers, students are able to produce output through
speaking. This happens when students consciously notice and reflect upon their expanded
vocabulary within themselves before uttering the word to get their meaning across. The
final outcome which is the Dependent Variable in this case study will be the students’
2.6 Summary
In many case studies, the usage of songs does provide a great impact in
improving the vocabulary for speaking ability of the students. It is from these
researches that we can see there is a major positive result towards the teaching method
Nonetheless, based on the researches, there are certain relative messages which
have been raised. Firstly, in using the songs, it is of the interest of the students which
21
promotes an understanding for students to learn the vocabulary and in turn, produce it
orally through interaction and communication. This in turn brings about a second
process; either by their own intuition or by the technique used to learn which interest
need to follow where there are already given topics or chapters at the Form 4 level
Thus, the literature review has given a better extent of variables that needs to be
researched upon in this research, considering the culture and context as well as the
purpose of English in general and personally for students. These variables will include
1) the genre of songs used, 2) the theme of the the songs used 3) their attitude in
learning the vocabulary using this method and lastly, 4) their ability to speak English
22
www.ccsenet.org/ass Asian Social Science Vol. 6, No. 10; October 2010
14 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025
Comparing Receptive and Productive Academic
Vocabulary
Knowledge of Chinese EFL Learners
Songbo Zhou
School of International Studies, Zhejiang University
388 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China
Tel: 86-571-8820-6256 E-mail: [email protected]
Holt, M. (1987). Skills and voctionalsim: The easy answer. Biddles Litd; Philadelphia’’
Meara, P. and Jones, G. (1990). Eurocentrtres Vocabulary Size Test, Version E1.1/K10. Zurich:
Eurocentrtres Learning
Service
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
S. Frith, W. Straw, and J. Street, 2001, The Cambridge Companion to Pop and
23
L.S. Vygotsky: Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological
Processes, p. 86
Taylor, Insup & Taylor, M. Martin (1990). Psycholinguistics: learning and using
Lantolf, J.P. (2004). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language learning. Shanghai:
Brief article
Songs as an aid for language acquisition
Daniele Scho¨n a,*, Maud Boyer b, Sylvain Moreno a,
Mireille Besson a, Isabelle Peretz c, Re´gine Kolinsky b
a INCM-CNRS & Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´ e, 31 Ch Joseph Aiguier, 13420 Marseille, France
24
b Unite´ de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, ULB CP191, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50,
1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
c De´partement de Psychologie, Universite´ de Montre´ al, C.P. 6128, Montre´ al, Que., Canada H3C 3J7
Received 13 July 2006; revised 24 February 2007; accepted 10 March 2007
http://www.bio.pu.ru/faculty/departments/vnd/pdf/selchenkova.pdf
25