Bonds Ch14int3
Bonds Ch14int3
Bonds Ch14int3
22. The covenants and other terms of the agreement between the issuer of bonds
and the lender are set forth in the
bond indenture.
23. The term used for bonds that are unsecured as to principal is
debenture bonds.
P
24. Bonds for which the owners' names are not registered with the issuing
corporation are called
bearer bonds.
S
25. Bonds that pay no interest unless the issuing company is profitable are called
income bonds.
S
26. If bonds are issued initially at a premium and the effective-interest method of
amortization is used, interest expense in the earlier years will be
greater than if the straight-line method were used.
27. The interest rate written in the terms of the bond indenture is known as the
coupon rate, nominal rate, or stated rate.
29. One step in calculating the issue price of the bonds is to multiply the principal by
the table value for
20 periods and 4% from the present value of 1 table.
31. Reich, Inc. issued bonds with a maturity amount of $200,000 and a maturity ten
years from date of issue. If the bonds were issued at a premium, this indicates
that
the nominal rate of interest exceeded the market rate.
32. If bonds are initially sold at a discount and the straight-line method of
amortization is used, interest expense in the earlier years will
exceed what it would have been had the effective-interest method of
amortization been used.
35. If bonds are issued between interest dates, the entry on the books of the issuing
corporation could include a
credit to Interest Expense.
36. When the interest payment dates of a bond are May 1 and November 1, and a
bond issue is sold on June 1, the amount of cash received by the issuer will be
increased by accrued interest from May 1 to June 1.
38. The printing costs and legal fees associated with the issuance of bonds should
be accumulated in a deferred charge account and amortized over the life of
the bonds.
41. The generally accepted method of accounting for gains or losses from the early
extinguishment of debt treats any gain or loss as
a difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of
the debt which should be recognized in the period of redemption.
P
42. "In-substance defeasance" is a term used to refer to an arrangement whereby
a company provides for the future repayment of a long-term debt by
placing purchased securities in an irrevocable trust.
P
43. A corporation borrowed money from a bank to build a building. The long-term
note signed by the corporation is secured by a mortgage that pledges title to the
building as security for the loan. The corporation is to pay the bank $80,000 each
year for 10 years to repay the loan. Which of the following relationships can you
expect to apply to the situation?
The amount of interest expense will decrease each period the loan is
outstanding, while the portion of the annual payment applied to the loan
principal will increase each period.
S
44. A debt instrument with no ready market is exchanged for property whose fair
market value is currently indeterminable. When such a transaction takes place
the present value of the debt instrument must be approximated using an
imputed interest rate.
45. When a note payable is issued for property, goods, or services, the present value
of the note is measured by
the fair value of the property, goods, or services.
the market value of the note.
using an imputed interest rate to discount all future payments on the note.
46. When a note payable is exchanged for property, goods, or services, the stated
interest rate is presumed to be fair unless
no interest rate is stated.
the stated interest rate is unreasonable.
the stated face amount of the note is materially different from the current
cash sales price for similar items or from current market value of the
note.
51. Which of the following must be disclosed relative to long-term debt maturities and
sinking fund requirements?
The amount of future payments for sinking fund requirements and long-
term debt maturities during each of the next five years.
52. Note disclosures for long-term debt generally include all of the following except
names of specific creditors.
*57. In a troubled debt restructuring in which the debt is settled by a transfer of assets
with a fair market value less than the carrying amount of the debt, the debtor
would recognize
a gain on the settlement.
*58. In a troubled debt restructuring in which the debt is continued with modified
terms, a gain should be recognized at the date of restructure, but no interest
expense should be recognized over the remaining life of the debt, whenever the
carrying amount of the pre-restructure debt is greater than the total future
cash flows.
*59. In a troubled debt restructuring in which the debt is continued with modified terms
and the carrying amount of the debt is less than the total future cash flows, the
creditor should
calculate its loss using the historical effective rate of the loan.
$5,218,809
($5,000,000 × .78120) + ($150,000 × 8.75206) = $5,218,809
65.Everhart Company issues $10,000,000, 6%, 5-year bonds dated January 1, 2010 on
January 1, 2010. The bonds pays interest semiannually on June 30 and
December 31. The bonds are issued to yield 5%. What are the proceeds from the
bond issue?
2.5% 3.0% 5.0% 6.0%
Present value of a single sum for 5 periods .88385 .86261 .78353 .74726
Present value of a single sum for 10 periods .78120 .74409 .61391 .55839
Present value of an annuity for 5 periods 4.64583 4.57971 4.32948 4.2123
6
Present value of an annuity for 10 periods 8.75206 8.53020 7.72173 7.3600
9
$10,437,618
($10,000,000 × .78120) + ($300,000 × 8.75206) = $10,437,618
The following information applies to both questions 77 and 78. On October 1, 2010
Macklin Corporation issued 5%, 10-year bonds with a face value of $1,000,000 at 104.
Interest is paid on October 1 and April 1, with any premiums or discounts amortized on a
straight-line basis.
77. The entry to record the issuance of the bonds would include a credit of
$40,000 to Premium on Bonds Payable.
($1,000,000 × 1.04) – $1,000,000 = $40,000 premium
78. Bond interest expense reported on the December 31, 2010 income statement of
Macklin Corporation would be
$11,500
[($1,000,000 × .05) × 3/12] – [($40,000 ÷ 10) × 3/12] = $11,500
The following information applies to both questions 79 and 80. On October 1, 2010
Bartley Corporation issued 5%, 10-year bonds with a face value of $500,000 at 104.
Interest is paid on October 1 and April 1, with any premiums or discounts amortized on a
straight-line basis.
79. The entry to record the issuance of the bonds would include a
credit of $20,000 to Premium on Bonds Payable.
($500,000 × 1.04) – $500,000 = $20,000 premium
80. Bond interest expense reported on the December 31, 2010 income statement of
Bartley Corporation would be
$5,750
[($500,000 × .05) × 3/12] – [($20,000 ÷ 10) × 3/12] = $5,750
81. At the beginning of 2010, Wallace Corporation issued 10% bonds with a face
value of $900,000. These bonds mature in the five years, and interest is paid
semiannually on June 30 and December 31. The bonds were sold for 833,760 to
yield 12%. Wallace uses a calendar-year reporting period. Using the effective-
interest method of amortization, what amount of interest expense should be
reported for 2010? (Round your answer to the nearest dollar.)
$100,353
($833,760 × .06) = $50,026; [$50,026 – ($900,000 × .05)] = $5,026
($833,760 + $5,026) × .06 = $50,327
$50,026 + $50,327 = $100,353
82. On January 1, Patterson Inc. issued $5,000,000, 9% bonds for $4,695,000. The
market rate of interest for these bonds is 10%. Interest is payable annually on
December 31. Patterson uses the effective-interest method of amortizing bond
discount. At the end of the first year, Patterson should report unamortized bond
discount of
$285,500.
($4,695,000 × .10) – ($5,000,000 × .09) = $19,500
($5,000,000 – $4,695,000) – $19,500 = $285,500
83. On January 1, Martinez Inc. issued $3,000,000, 11% bonds for $3,195,000. The
market rate of interest for these bonds is 10%. Interest is payable annually on
December 31. Martinez uses the effective-interest method of amortizing bond
premium. At the end of the first year, Martinez should report unamortized bond
premium of:
$184,500
($3,000,000 × .11) – ($3,195,000 × .10) = $10,500
($3,195,000 – $3,000,000) – $10,500 = $184,500
84. At the beginning of 2010, Winston Corporation issued 10% bonds with a face
value of $600,000. These bonds mature in five years, and interest is paid
semiannually on June 30 and December 31. The bonds were sold for 555,840 to
yield 12%. Winston uses a calendar-year reporting period. Using the effective-
interest method of amortization, what amount of interest expense should be
reported for 2010? (Round your answer to the nearest dollar.)
$66,901
($555,840 × .06) = $33,350; [$33,350 – ($600,000 × .05)] = $3,350
($555,840 + $3,350) × .06 = $33,551
$33,350 + $33,551 = $66,901
85. Kant Corporation retires its $100,000 face value bonds at 102 on January 1,
following the payment of interest. The carrying value of the bonds at the
redemption date is $96,250. The entry to record the redemption will include a
credit of $3,750 to Discount on Bonds Payable.
$100,000 – $96,250 = $3,750 discount
86. Carr Corporation retires its $100,000 face value bonds at 105 on January 1,
following the payment of interest. The carrying value of the bonds at the
redemption date is $103,745. The entry to record the redemption will include a
debit of $3,745 to Premium on Bonds Payable.
$103,745 – $100,000 = $3,745 premium.
87. At December 31, 2010 the following balances existed on the books of Foxworth
Corporation:
Bonds Payable $2,000,000
Discount on Bonds Payable 160,000
Interest Payable 50,000
Unamortized Bond Issue Costs 120,000
If the bonds are retired on January 1, 2011, at 102, what will Foxworth report as a
loss on redemption?
$320,000
($2,000,000 × 1.02) – ($2,000,000 – $160,000 – $120,000) = $320,000
88. At December 31, 2010 the following balances existed on the books of Rentro
Corporation:
Bonds Payable $1,500,000
Discount on Bonds Payable 120,000
Interest Payable 37,000
Unamortized Bond Issue Costs 90,000
If the bonds are retired on January 1, 2011, at 102, what will Rentro report as a
loss on redemption?
$240,000
($1,500,000 × 1.02) – ($1,500,000 – $120,000 – $90,000) = $240,000
89. The December 31, 2010, balance sheet of Hess Corporation includes the
following items:
9% bonds payable due December 31, 2019 $1,000,000
Unamortized premium on bonds payable 27,000
The bonds were issued on December 31, 2009, at 103, with interest payable on
July 1 and December 31 of each year. Hess uses straight-line amortization. On
March 1, 2011, Hess retired $400,000 of these bonds at 98 plus accrued interest.
What should Hess record as a gain on retirement of these bonds? Ignore taxes.
$18,600.
91. The 10% bonds payable of Nixon Company had a net carrying amount of
$570,000 on December 31, 2010. The bonds, which had a face value of
$600,000, were issued at a discount to yield 12%. The amortization of the bond
discount was recorded under the effective-interest method. Interest was paid on
January 1 and July 1 of each year. On
July 2, 2011, several years before their maturity, Nixon retired the bonds at 102.
The interest payment on July 1, 2011 was made as scheduled. What is the loss
that Nixon should record on the early retirement of the bonds on July 2, 2011?
Ignore taxes.
$37,800.
$570,000 + [($570,000 × .06) – ($600,000 × .05)] = $574,200 (CV of bonds)
$574,200 – ($600,000 × 1.02) = $37,800.
92. A corporation called an outstanding bond obligation four years before maturity. At
that time there was an unamortized discount of $300,000. To extinguish this debt,
the company had to pay a call premium of $100,000. Ignoring income tax
considerations, how should these amounts be treated for accounting purposes?
Charge $400,000 to a loss in the year of extinguishment.
$300,000 + $100,000 = $400,000
93. The 12% bonds payable of Nyman Co. had a carrying amount of $832,000 on
December 31, 2010. The bonds, which had a face value of $800,000, were
issued at a premium to yield 10%. Nyman uses the effective-interest method of
amortization. Interest is paid on June 30 and December 31. On June 30, 2011,
several years before their maturity, Nyman retired the bonds at 104 plus accrued
interest. The loss on retirement, ignoring taxes, is
$6,400.
$832,000 – [($800,000 × .06) – ($832,000 × .05)] = $825,600 (CV of bonds)
($800,000 × 1.04) – $825,600 = $6,400
96. On January 1, 2010, Ann Price loaned $45,078 to Joe Kiger. A zero-interest-
bearing note (face amount, $60,000) was exchanged solely for cash; no other
rights or privileges were exchanged. The note is to be repaid on December 31,
2012. The prevailing rate of interest for a loan of this type is 10%. The present
value of $60,000 at 10% for three years is $45,078. What amount of interest
income should Ms. Price recognize in 2010?
$4,508.
$45,078 × .10 = $4,508
97. On January 1, 2010, Jacobs Company sold property to Dains Company which
originally cost Jacobs $760,000. There was no established exchange price for
this property. Danis gave Jacobs a $1,200,000 zero-interest-bearing note
payable in three equal annual installments of $400,000 with the first payment due
December 31, 2010. The note has no ready market. The prevailing rate of
interest for a note of this type is 10%. The present value of a $1,200,000 note
payable in three equal annual installments of $400,000 at a 10% rate of interest
is $994,800. What is the amount of interest income that should be recognized by
Jacobs in 2010, using the effective-interest method?
$99,480.
$994,800 × .10 = $99,480
98. On January 1, 2010, Crown Company sold property to Leary Company. There
was no established exchange price for the property, and Leary gave Crown a
$2,000,000 zero-interest-bearing note payable in 5 equal annual installments of
$400,000, with the first payment due December 31, 2010. The prevailing rate of
interest for a note of this type is 9%. The present value of the note at 9% was
$1,442,000 at January 1, 2010. What should be the balance of the Discount on
Notes Payable account on the books of Leary at December 31, 2010 after
adjusting entries are made, assuming that the effective-interest method is used?
$428,220
$2,000,000 – $1,442,000 – ($1,442,000 × .09) = $428,220
99. Putnam Company’s 2010 financial statements contain the following selected
data:
Income taxes $40,000
Interest expense 20,000
Net income 60,000
Putnam’s times interest earned for 2010 is
6 times.
$60,000 + $40,000 + $20,000
————————————— = 6 times.
$20,000
100. In the recent year Hill Corporation had net income of $140,000, interest expense
of $40,000, and tax expense of $20,000. What was Hill Corporation's times
interest earned ratio for the year?
5.0
($140,000 + $40,000 + $20,000) ÷ $40,000 = 5.0
101. In recent year Cey Corporation had net income of $250,000, interest expense of
$50,000, and a times interest earned ratio of 9. What was Cey Corporation's
income before taxes for the year?
$400,000
($250,000 + $50,000 + X) ÷ $50,000 = 9
($300,000 + X) = 9 × $50,000
X = $150,000; IBT = $400,000 ($250,000 + $150,000
102. The adjusted trial balance for Lifesaver Corp. at the end of the current year,
2010, contained the following accounts.
5-year Bonds Payable 8% $1,500,000
Bond Interest Payable 50,000
Premium on Bonds Payable 100,000
Notes Payable (3 mo.) 40,000
Notes Payable (5 yr.) 165,000
Mortgage Payable ($15,000 due currently) 200,000
Salaries Payable 18,000
Taxes Payable (due 3/15 of 2011) 25,000
*103. Nolte should recognize a gain or loss on the transfer of the equipment of
$40,000 gain.
$290,000 – ($480,000 – $230,000) = $40,000
*104. Nolte should recognize a gain on the partial settlement and restructure of the
debt of
$75,000.
($600,000 + $60,000) – [$290,000 + $250,000 + ($250,000 × 06 × 3)]
= $75,000.
106. On July 1, 2010, Spear Co. issued 1,000 of its 10%, $1,000 bonds at 99 plus
accrued interest. The bonds are dated April 1, 2010 and mature on April 1, 2020.
Interest is payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1. What amount did
Spear receive from the bond issuance?
$1,015,000
($1,000,000 × .99) + ($1,000,000 × .10 × 3/12) = $1,015,000
107. On January 1, 2010, Solis Co. issued its 10% bonds in the face amount of
$3,000,000, which mature on January 1, 2020. The bonds were issued for
$3,405,000 to yield 8%, resulting in bond premium of $405,000. Solis uses the
effective-interest method of amortizing bond premium. Interest is payable
annually on December 31. At December 31, 2010, Solis's adjusted unamortized
bond premium should be
$377,400.
$405,000 – [($3,000,000 × .10) – ($3,405,000 × .08)] = $377,400
108. On July 1, 2009, Noble, Inc. issued 9% bonds in the face amount of $5,000,000,
which mature on July 1, 2015. The bonds were issued for $4,695,000 to yield
10%, resulting in a bond discount of $305,000. Noble uses the effective-interest
method of amortizing bond discount. Interest is payable annually on June 30. At
June 30, 2011, Noble's unamortized bond discount should be
$264,050.
2009–2010:$4,695,000 + [($4,695,000 × .1) – ($5,000,000 × .09)]
= $4,714,500.
2010–2011: $4,714,500 + ($471,450 – $450,000) = $4,735,950
$5,000,000 – $4,735,950 = $264,050.
109. On January 1, 2010, Huff Co. sold $1,000,000 of its 10% bonds for $885,296 to
yield 12%. Interest is payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1. What
amount should Huff report as interest expense for the six months ended June 30,
2010?
$53,118
$885,296 × .06 = $53,118
110. On January 1, 2011, Doty Co. redeemed its 15-year bonds of $2,500,000 par
value for 102. They were originally issued on January 1, 1999 at 98 with a
maturity date of
January 1, 2014. The bond issue costs relating to this transaction were
$150,000. Doty amortizes discounts, premiums, and bond issue costs using the
straight-line method. What amount of loss should Doty recognize on the
redemption of these bonds (ignore taxes)?
$90,000
($2,500,000 × 1.02) – = $90,000
$200, 000
$2, 300, 000 12
15
111. On its December 31, 2010 balance sheet, Emig Corp. reported bonds payable of
$6,000,000 and related unamortized bond issue costs of $320,000. The bonds
had been issued at par. On January 2, 2011, Emig retired $3,000,000 of the
outstanding bonds at par plus a call premium of $70,000. What amount should
Emig report in its 2011 income statement as loss on extinguishment of debt
(ignore taxes)?
$230,000
($3,000,000 + $70,000) – [($6,000,000 – $320,000) × 1/2] = $230,000
112. On January 1, 2006, Goll Corp. issued 1,000 of its 10%, $1,000 bonds for
$1,040,000. These bonds were to mature on January 1, 2016 but were callable
at 101 any time after December 31, 2009. Interest was payable semiannually on
July 1 and January 1. On
July 1, 2011, Goll called all of the bonds and retired them. Bond premium was
amortized on a straight-line basis. Before income taxes, Goll's gain or loss in
2011 on this early extinguishment of debt was
$8,000 gain.
– ($1,000,000 × 1.01) = $8,000
$40, 000
$1, 040,000 11
20
113. On June 30, 2011, Omara Co. had outstanding 8%, $3,000,000 face amount, 15-
year bonds maturing on June 30, 2021. Interest is payable on June 30 and
December 31. The unamortized balances in the bond discount and deferred
bond issue costs accounts on June 30, 2011 were $105,000 and $30,000,
respectively. On June 30, 2011, Omara acquired all of these bonds at 94 and
retired them. What net carrying amount should be used in computing gain or loss
on this early extinguishment of debt?
$2,865,000.
$3,000,000 – ($105,000 + $30,000) = $2,865,000
114. A ten-year bond was issued in 2009 at a discount with a call provision to retire
the bonds. When the bond issuer exercised the call provision on an interest date
in 2011, the carrying amount of the bond was less than the call price. The amount
of bond liability removed from the accounts in 2011 should have equaled the
face amount less unamortized discount.
115. Paige Co. took advantage of market conditions to refund debt. This was the
fourth refunding operation carried out by Paige within the last three years. The
excess of the carrying amount of the old debt over the amount paid to extinguish
it should be reported as a
part of continuing operations.
*116. Eddy Co. is indebted to Cole under a $400,000, 12%, three-year note dated
December 31, 2009. Because of Eddy's financial difficulties developing in 2011,
Eddy owed accrued interest of $48,000 on the note at December 31, 2011.
Under a troubled debt restructuring, on December 31, 2011, Cole agreed to settle
the note and accrued interest for a tract of land having a fair value of $360,000.
Eddy's acquisition cost of the land is $290,000. Ignoring income taxes, on its
2011 income statement Eddy should report as a result of the troubled debt
restructuring
Gain on Disposal Restructuring Gain
$70,000 $88,000