Poetry and Painting: Chinese and Western Views of Their Convertibility

Author(s): Hans H. Frankel

Source: Comparative Literature , Autumn, 1957, Vol. 9, No. 4 (Autumn, 1957), pp. 289-
307
Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of the University of Oregon

Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1768547

REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1768547?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms

and Duke University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Comparative Literature

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 COMPARATIVE
LITERATURE
VOLUME IX FALL 1957 NUMBER 4

POETRY AND PAINTING: CHINESE AND WESTERN

VIEWS OF THEIR CONVERTIBILITY

HANS H. FRANKEL

LOPE DE VEGA, in one of his sonnets, refers to two famous con

temporaries in a striking way; he calls the Italian poet Marin
"a great painter for the ears," and the Flemish painter Rubens "a great
poet for the eyes":
Dos cosas despertaron mis antojos,
extrangeras, no al alma, a los sentidos:
Marino, gran pintor de los oydos,
y Rubens, gran poeta de los ojos.1

Six hundred years and 6,000 miles away, a similar concept occurs
a parallel situation. The Chinese poet Su Shih (Su Tung-p'o, 103
1101), in one of his poems, praises two men, one a poet and the oth
a painter:
Tu Fu's poems are figureless paintings,
Han Kan's paintings are wordless poems.2

In both poems, a very special relationship is established between

poetry and painting. They are considered parallel and comparable;
more than that, they take each other's place. This concept has several
interesting aspects, some of which will be examined in the following
pages. A comparative treatment of the same phenomenon in two widely
separated and obviously unrelated literatures may bring out significant
similarities as well as differences.
One of the basic assumptions underlying the concept of the converti-
1 Rimnas humanas y divinas, facsimile reprint of Madrid 1634 ed. (Madrid,
1935), p. 56, verso. Angel Valbuena Prat, Historia de la litcratura espaiola, 3rd ed.
(Barcelona, 1950), II, 300-301, takes these lines in a different, somewhat disparag-
ing sense. But Lope's admiration for both Marino and Rubens is well attested.
2 Chinese text and German translation in T'eng Ku, "Su Tung P'o als Kunst-
kritiker," Ostasiatische Zeitschrift, n.s., VIII (1932), 107.
[ 289 1

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
290 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

bility of poetry and painting is their equality. This equalit

took many centuries to develop in both Europe and China.
In the European Middle Ages, painting was generally
inferior to literature. This attitude is epitomized in the w
Gregory the Great, who wrote in one of his letters: "Q
scriptura, hoc idiotis praestat pictura."3 (What writing
literate, painting offers to the ignorant.) This pronoun
surprising in an age when cultural activities were the
rogative of those few who could read and write. In th
churches of Europe there is ample evidence of the ex
painting and other arts of design were employed for th
struction of the illiterate masses. Indeed, the fine arts
"laicorum litteratura."4
During the Italian Renaissance painters and sculptors fought a long
and bitter struggle to rid themselves of this low reputation. In numer-
ous writings, they emphasized the mathematical and scientific basis
of their work, to prove that they were intellectuals rather than crafts-
men, and thus the equals of writers.5 They proclaimed contemporary
art as the true heir of classical antiquity, and never tired of citing classi-
cal authors such as Simonides of Ceos, who called painting "silent po-
etry," and poetry "speaking painting."6 Another favorite standby was
Horace's dictum, "Ut pictura poesis"7 (Poetry is like painting)-with
characteristic disregard for the context. In fact, not only Horace but
most of the other ancient authorities whom the Italians blithely quoted
in support of their thesis were actually speaking not of painting but
of literature.8 But that did not deter these stout champions of the fine
arts. They took their ammunition wherever they found it, even from
philology. The sculptor and poet Pomponius Gauricus pointed to the
Greek word graphein, which means both "to write" and "to paint," as
proof that these two arts are inseparable.9 (He would have been pleased
to know that in literary Chinese, too, a single verb, hsieh, is used in the
dual sense of "to write" and "to paint," and that the expression tu hua(
"to look at a painting" literally means "to read a painting.")
3 Epistolae, IX, 9, quoted by Fritz Saxl, Antike Gotter int der Spiitrecnaissancc
(Leipzig and Berlin, 1927), p. 10.
4 See Leonardo Olschki, Die romanischen Literaturen des Mittelalters (Wild-
park-Potsdam, 1928), p. 17.
5 See Anthony Blunt, Artistic Theory in Italy, 1450-1600 (Oxford, 1940), pp.
48-54.
6 Cited in Plutarch, Moralia, 346 f. The precise meaning of Simonides' state-
ment cannot be inferred from this isolated quotation, without any context.
7 Ars poetica, line 361.
8 See Rensselaer W. Lee, "Ut pictura poesis: The Humanistic Theory of Paint-
ing," Art Bulletin, XXII (1940), 197-269. This article also contains a full list of
pertinent passages from classical literature.
9 De sculptura (1504), cited in Jean Paul and Irma A. Richter, The Literary
Works of Leonardo da Vinci, 2nd ed. (London, 1939), I, 48-49.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 291

In Italy, the struggle to win equality for painters and

veloped into a grand debate on the relative merits of
on the one hand and literature on the other. A vigorous
painting was Leonardo da Vinci. In the first part of h
Painting he demonstrates in detail the superiority of p
poetry. To him, the eye is "the most noble sense," while th
less noble one."'0 "Painting," he asserts, "represents the
ture's works with more truth than does the poet."11 Ne
also suggests their convertibility, as when he states: "
poetry that is seen and not heard, and poetry is a paint
heard and not seen."'2
On the opposite side, there were men like Mario Equicola, who
wrote: "However worthy of praise painting, modelling and sculpture
may be, nevertheless they must be considered far inferior to poetry in
dignity and authority. Painting is a work and labour more of the body
than of the mind, and is, more often than not, exercised by the ignor-
ant."13
Thus the battle raged. But by the end of the sixteenth century the
equality of painting had been fairly well established in Western Eur-
ope. The ancient prejudice lingered on, however, for instance in the
form of oppressive taxes leveled on painters in Spain through most of
the seventeenth century.14 But so little memory remained of the ancient
rivalry in seventeenth-century Spain that Fray Hortensio Felix de
Paravicino (1580-1633), who called himself "grande apasionado de
los pintores,"15 could say in one of his sermons: "Nunca los pinceles
rifneron con las plumas."16
In China, the gradual rise of painting to a level of full equality with
literature runs parallel to the European development in some respects.
but there are also important differences. For many centuries, the art
of painting occupied a somewhat ambiguous position in Chinese civili-
zation. On the one hand, the educated classes of mediaeval China, like
their European counterparts, tended to look down on painters as un-
lettered artisans. The bulk of mediaeval painting in China-as in Eur-
ope-was done by skilled craftsmen who remained nameless and of
whom therefore little is known. Some of their work, dating approxi-
10 Translation by A. Philip McMahon, Treatise on Painting, by Leonardo (da
Vinci (Princeton, 1956), I, 17.
1 Ibid., p. 20.
12 Ibid., p. 17.
13 Translation by Blunt (see note 5), p. 52, from Institusioni ... con un eruditis-
simo discorso della pittura (Milan, 1541).
14 See Ernst Robert Curtius, "Calder6n und die Malerei," RF, L (1936), 109-
110.
15 Cited by Emilio Alarcos, "Los sermones de' Paravicino," RFE, XXIV (1937),
291, note 1.
16 Cited by M. Herrero Garcia, Estimaciones literarias del sialo X VII (Madrid,
1930), p. 233.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
292 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

mately from the fifth to the eleventh century, has come t

century in the wall paintings and silk scrolls of Tun-huan
On the other hand, painting was taken up occasionally
men as an avocation. Beginning about the second centu
and increasing in volume in the following centuries, w
of individuals who were recognized and esteemed by the li
the court as great painters. But few of them were kno
exclusively. Most of them were also accomplished in l
scholarship, and some held high official posts. Even m
best families took an interest in painting, either as con
collectors or by practicing the art themselves. For exa
an imperial prince of the Liang dynasty, took up painting
to his numerous literary and scholarly activities. (He l
the throne for a brief period, 552-555, and is known by t
name Yiian-ti.)
As late as the T'ang dynasty (618-907), the ambiguity in the posi-
tion of painting had not yet been resolved. That it was considered a
respectable avocation is clear from the fact that it was practiced by
several T'ang emperors and members of their families.17 Indeed, one
of the most illustrious painters of that dynasty, Li Ssu-hsiin (651-716),
was related to the imperial house, and his nephew Li Lin-fu (died 752),
who held the reins of government for many years, was also a painter.
The high esteem in which T'ang painters were held by their contem-
poraries is evident in many of the poems of Tu Fu (712-770).18 But
from the point of view of the court historiographers, those who were
known only as painters, not as writers or high officials, were not deemed
worthy of being included in the official histories among the great men
of the dynasty. Such is the case of Wa Tao-tzu (Wu Tao-hsiian), one
of the most celebrated of all T'ang painters, who was employed and
highly honored at the court of Emperor Hsiian-tsung (reigned 712-
756). Generally, painters who do have biographies in the histories of
the mediaeval dynasties are recorded there as officials or as literati, and
their artistic achievements are treated only incidentally.
The traditional contempt of painting as a mere craft is evident in
the official histories of the T'ang dynasty. In the biography of the fa-
mous court painter Yen Li-pen (died 673) we read:
Once, when Emperor T'ai-tsung was taking a boat ride on the Ch'un-yiian Lake
with a reinue of courtiers and scholars, there was a rare bird [or birds?] com-
fortably riding the waves. T'ai-tsung greatly appreciated it. He ordered those
who were in attendance to write poems about it, and summoned Li-pen with the

17 T'ang emperors and princes who painted are listed by Chang Yen-yuan in
his Li-tai minig-hua chi (ed. in Chin-tai pi-shu, 7th ser.), 9. la-b.
18 See for instance the famous poem in which he pays tribute to the painter
Ts'ao Pa, translated by William Hung, Tu Fu, China's Greatest Poet (Cambridge,
Mass., 1952), pp. 211-212.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 293

command to paint it. Then the cry was passed on outside the p
painter Yen Li-pen !"19 [And yet] he already held at that time t
Secretary of the Bureau of Titles of Nobility. He came runn
heavily, and crouched at the lake shore. Holding the paints in
spectfully looked up to the assembled guests, blushing with utt
returned to his home, he admonished his sons with these words: "When I was
young, I devoted myself to book learning, and had the good fortune to escape
from ignorance. I followed my inclination to letters, and was not inferior to my
fellow students. But I became known only as a painter. To be used [now] as a
menial workman is the greatest possible humiliation. Let me warn you severely:
do not practice this lowly skill."20

Elsewhere in the biography of Yen Li-pen it is stated that he became

a high official despite, not because of, being a painter. A similar atti-
tude prevailed in the ninth century. Chu Ching-hsiian, writing probably
in the early 840s,21 says of the painter Ch'eng Hsiu-chi: "From the
Chen-yiian era [785-805] on, he was the only individual at the capital
who owed his advancement to the art of painting, and was continually
graced by the imperial favor."22 In the first detailed history of Chinese
painting, the Li-tai ming-hua chi (Record of Famous Painters of Suc-
cessive Dynasties) by Chang Yen-yuan, completed in or around 847,
the author finds it necessary to go to great lengths to demonstrate the
respectability of painting. Some of his arguments recall those used by
the European champions of the fine arts during the Renaissance. Just
as the Italians cited passages from classical authors which dealt with
literature and applied them to painting, so Chang quotes classical texts
praising the art of writing, implying that painting is to be equated with
writing. He also manipulates the multiple meanings of the word t'u
(charts, maps, paintings). Historical records indicating high regard
for charts and maps are cited as if they referred to paintings.23
The final emancipation of painters occurred during the Sung dynasty
(960-1280), when painting was introduced into the official system of
education and civil service. It should be remembered that, under the
19 As one would call for a master carpenter or a kitchen chef.
20 Chiu T'ang-shu (Po-na ed.), 77.7a-b, also in Li-tai ming-hua chi (note 17
above), 9.4a-b. Whether the story is true or not, it is at any rate significant for
the attitude of the T'ang historiographers. It has previously been translated by
Tomita Kojiro, "Portraits of the Emperors," Bulletin of the Museum of Fine
Arts (Boston), XXX (1932), 4; and by Hu Shih, "A Historian Looks at Chinese
Painting," Asia, XLI (1941), 217. Dr. Hu in his essay also elucidates several
other matters on which I have touched in this paper. Shorter versions of the story
appear in Hsin T'ang-shu (Po-na ed.), 100.8a and in T'ang-ch'ao ming-hua lu
by Chu Ching-hsiian, in Wang shih hua-yiian (photolith reprint, T'ai-tung t'u-shu
chii, 1922), 6.5a, the latter translated by Alexander C. Soper in Archives of the
Chinese Art Society of America, IV (1950), 11.
21 See Soper, p. 5.
22 Translation by Soper, p. 18.
23 See the Chinese text with translation and detailed commentary by William
R. B. Acker in his Some T'ang and pre-T'ang Texts on Chinese Painting (Leiden,
1954), pp. 61-110.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
294 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

Chinese civil-service system, state examinations were the

to an official career. The chief subjects of the examina
Confucian classics, with orthodox commentaries, and liter
in poetry and prose. To help candidates prepare for these
inations, a number of government schools were maintaine
perial capitals. To the subjects taught in these institutions
added in the tenth century, and at the beginning of the tw
Emperor Hui-tsung-himself a distinguished painter-s
examinations as part of the state examination system. T
tions were adapted from the literary examinations, that i
dates were given themes, usually one or two lines from a
they were to express in painting (showing to what extent
still dominated by poetry). The importance of these p
emies" and examinations for the selection of officials has sometimes
been exaggerated, but there is no doubt that painters under the Sung
dynasty, especially during the reign of Hui-tsung, were honored as
never before.24
If thus eventually, both in the East and in the West, painting
achieved a status of equality and association with literature, we may
now ask in what way literature took account of this affinity. The very
titles of books published in Western Europe in the early seventeenth
century are often revelatory. Harsdorffer's Andachtsgemidlde are poems
accompanied by illustrations. Marino's Galleria consists of "Pitture"
and "Sculture," with each poem describing a work of art, actual or
imaginary. In the titles of French poems published at that time, the
words "tableau" and "portrait" frequently appear.
Not only in their book titles but in their works themselves, European
baroque poets often present themselves as painters, sculptors, or archi-
tects. Jacques Davy Du Perron writes:
Je veux batir un temple a l'Inconstance,
Tous amoureux y viendront adorer...
Tout a l'entour, je peindrai mainte image
D'erreur, d'oubli et d'infidelite.. 25

Hofmannswaldau concludes his "AbriB eines verliebten" with these

lines:

Und daB ich nicht zuviel von einer sache sage,

Die alien ist bekannt als allgemeine plage,

24 On the painting academies, see T'eng Ku, "Duarum artis picturae scholarum,
nempe Yuan-t'i ac Wen-jen, conspectus historicus traditur" (in Chinese), Fu-jen
hsiieh-chih, 11,2 (Sept. 1930), 65-85; A. G. Wenley, "A Note on the So-Called
Sung Academy of Painting," Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, VI (1941),
269-272; and Shih Yai, "A Chronology of Notable Facts and Works of the Han-
lin Painting Studio of the Sung Dynasty" (in Chinese), Chung-kuo wen-hua yen-
chiu hui-k'an (Bulletin of Chinese Studies), III (1943), 327-360.
25 "Le Temple de l'Inconstance," in Les Poetes fran~ais, II (Paris, 1861), 358.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 295

So muB der vorhang weg. Das mahlwerk ist vollbracht,

Hier hat der mahler selbst sein ebenbild gemacht.26

Even more popular than the self-portrait was the por

beloved. An example by Johannes Plavius follows (it doe
that the poet in this case speaks not for himself but for th
who commissioned the poem). The excerpt is significan
emphasis on the insufficiency of both poetry and painting
Rosemund mein liebelein
Wenn es k6nte miiglich seyn
Vnnd mein wiinsch nicht war vmbsonst
Wunscht' ich mir Apellis konst.
DaB ich euch / ihr engel-zier /
Kont' abmahlen nach gebiir /
Nach gebiir ewr auglein-klar /
Nach gebiir ewr giilden haar...

Ach mein wunsch ist nur ein tandt!

Kan auch wol die mahler hand /
Welche zwar den leib entreisst /
Mahlen solch einn hohen geist /
Der mit tugend wol geziert
Ihren schonen leib regiert?...27

A typical turn is taken in a poem by Jean Auvray. It begins by de-

scribing an actual painting and ends up with these lines, which trans-
form the poem itself into a painting:
Je vous offre donc ces figures
Oi ma plume fut mon pinceau;
Mais je leur destine un rideau
Si vous n'en aimez les peintures.28

Instead of pretending to be a painter himself, the poet may also call

on an imaginary painter to do the work for him. For example, Quevedo
begins a poetic description:
A la sombra de Batilo
pon, pintor, un arbol verde...29

This poem, to be sure, is not original with Quevedo. It is a free rendi-

tion of a Greek poem, wrongly attributed to Anacreon.30 But it
precisely in such translations and imitations that we can establish
tendencies and tastes of a poet, by seeing clearly what he accepted, re
jected, altered, or added. In this case, Quevedo took the elements
26 Hoch- und Spitbarock, ed. Herbert Cysarz (Leipzig, 1937), pp. 209-210.
27 Danziger Barockdichtung, ed. Heinz Kindermann (Leipzig, 1939), p. 70.
28 "Le Tableau de l'Aurore," in Anthologie poctique francaise, XVlIe siec
ed. Maurice Allem (Paris, n.d.), I, 190-192.
29 Obras comnzpletas de don Francisco de Quevedo Villegas: Obras en vers
ed. Luis Astrana Marin (Madrid, 1932), p. 694.
30 Anacreontica, 18.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
296 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

the picture from pseudo-Anacreon, but he added the pain

words, his idyllic landscape is not a static and finished
work of art, a painting, which comes into being befor
very eyes. The tree is literally put into the picture. L
comes both pictorial and dramatic.
While Quevedo here conjures up an imaginary painte
appeal to real painters for aid and inspiration. Thus Marin
ing the death of Adonis, invokes the painter Morazzone,
a picture of the dying Adonis:
Spira a gli inchiostri miei di vita privi
L'aura vital de la tua nobil arte,
Ed a ritrarlo ancor morto, ma bello,
Insegni a la mia penna il tuo pennello.
(Adone, XVIII, 99)

By the skillful use of a pun (penna--pennello), the poet underlines

both the contrast and the affinity between the two arts.
Marino is known to have been a great admirer and collector of paint-
ings, and the tribute which he pays here and elsewhere to the painter's
art is at the same time an acknowledgment of the limitations of his own
craft, poetry. Similarly, Crashaw, who was a painter as well as a poet,
feels that neither art form is sufficient in itself:

I paint so ill my peece had need to be

Painted again by some good Poesie.
I write so ill, my slender Line is scarce
So much as th' Picture of a well-lim'd verse... 31

Painting is here no fiction; a picture actually accompanied the poem.

But the two arts are not merely placed side by side; they penetrate
and complete each other.
Some of the concepts already encountered, and others not yet dis-
cussed, are found in a Portuguese poem from the collection A fenix
renascida. The author is believed to be Jeronimo Baia. It is entitled
"Retrato," and paints the charms of the beautiful Filis. It contains the
following passage:
Vi-a, e logo amor,
Vi-a, e Febo logo,
Quer que pinte a c6res,
Quer que cante a coros.
Meti-me em debuxos
E sai cor tonos.
Quem me f6ra Apeles!
Quem me f6ra Apolo !32

31 "With a Picture Sent to a Friend," in Steps to the Temple, Delights of

Muses, and Other Poems, ed. A. R. Waller (Cambridge, 1904), p. 127.
32 A poesia lirica cultista e conceptista, ed. Hernani Cidade, 2nd ed. (Lisbo
1942), p. 3.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 297

I saw her, and at once Love-

I saw her, and Phoebus at once-
Bids me paint in colors-
Bids me sing in choruses.

I applied myself to drawings

And came out with melodies.
If only I had an Apelles!
If only I had an Apollo!

It will be noted that alternate lines are devoted to "painting" and to

"singing" (which here subsumes poetry), with parallelism in each
couplet, producing the effect of a neat balance of two parallel arts. The
affinity of the two media is further emphasized by puns, prominently
placed at the ends of successive lines: cores (colors) is matched by
coros (choruses); and Apelles, the great painter of antiquity, by
Apollo, the god of the Muses. The sentence beginning in the first line
continues in the third; and that of the second line, in the fourth. This
interweaving construction, not uncommon in Spanish and Portuguese
baroque poetry, serves here to bring out the interpenetration of the two
media. Their convertibility is represented in the fifth and sixth lines
as an involuntary shift from visual to auditory creation-in this order,
because the result is, after all, a poem. In his urge to do justice to the
beauty of his beloved, the poet tries to break through the confines of
his own craft, and wishes the greatest masters of both arts to perform
for him what is beyond his reach. (We found the same sense of in-
sufficiency in Plavius, Marino, and Crashaw.) He expands his creative
range by usurping other media (painting and music) and by exploiting
each medium to the fullest extent. (One voice is not enough, not even
a chorus; there must be "choruses.")
Several seventeenth-century poets were also painters. Examples are
Lope, Quevedo, and Jauregui in Spain; Crashaw in England; Anna
Roemers Visscher in Holland; Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz in Mexico.
Others, like Marino, were connoisseurs and collectors of art or, like
Calderon, champions and defenders of painters. This consideration may
prompt an objection to my thesis that the convertibility of poetry and
painting is a characteristic concept of the baroque. Is it not perfectly
natural, one may ask, for a poet who is interested in painting to reflect
this interest in his poetry ?
To meet this objection, I submit the case of an earlier master who
was outstanding both in the fine arts and in poetry, Michelangelo.
His poems do indeed contain many references to sculpture and paint-
ing, but nowhere any suggestion that these arts are germane to
poetry. Similarly, in eighth-century China, Wang Wei often speaks
in his poems of the two media in which he worked, poetry and
painting, but always separately, without suggesting any affinity be-

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
298 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

tween them. In one poem where he does place them si

puts it like this:
... In this life I have usurped the fame of a poet;
In a former existence I must have been a painter.. .33

Thus he is clearly conscious of his achievements in bot

keeps them strictly apart, speaking of them as if they be
separate incarnations. (He was a devout Buddhist.) The
of the concept of convertibility occurs only in a later age
The baroque urge to bring poetry and painting together
forms. One of the most bizarre is the figure poem, where
shape of the written (or printed) poem is an image of the
ject. This device goes back to Hellenistic literature. It
ployed by Simias of Rhodes, who wrote poems in the sh
Cupid's wings, and an egg.34 Other Greek and Roman
suit, and the practice was revived occasionally during the
It also occurs in Persian literature, I understand, with
in the shape of trees, parasols, and the like.35 Nor is it ab
where ingenious minds thought up an abundance of in
devices and pastimes. Poems arranged in the shape of co
-a table, a bee hive, a bottle gourd, etc.-appear at a co
late date, from about the fifteenth century on.36
In seventeenth-century Europe, the figure poem wa
both in theory and in practice. It was seriously recom
poetics of France, Holland, and Germany, and practiced
time, though usually without serious poetic intent. Most o
figure poems were occasional pieces. Thus heart-shape
sent to convey amorous sentiments, cups for congratul
for condolences, and the like. The literary merit of such a
of course slight, but they are an interesting expression of
combine pictorial representation with poetry. The same
seen in the many books of emblems and devices. While
confined to the baroque period, they were extremely p
time. In these books, picture and word have an equal share
ing the same idea.
An interesting parallel from Sung-dynasty China are boo
Mlei-hua hsi-shen p'u, where a hundred stages in the d
the plum blossom are shown in wood cuts, matched by a p
stage. The poems and the paintings on which the wood
were done by the same artist, Sung Po-jen.
From a psychological and aesthetic point of view, the co
33 Wang Yu-ch'eng chi (ed. in Ssu-pu ts'zng-k'an), 6.6b.
34 See Hermann Frankel, De Simia Rhodio (G6ttingen, 1915),
35 See Paul Horn, Geschichte der persischien Litteratur (Leipzi
36 Many examples may be seen in Hui-wen lei-chii, hsii pien.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 299

of poetry and painting may be interpreted as synaesthe

widespread phenomenon assumes certain special aspects
pean baroque and in Sung-dynasty China. For instance,
ness, already mentioned, for turning actual and imagin
and sculptures into poetry is in itself a manifestation of s
But Marino goes further. He takes pains to show that
themselves, even before they become poetry, are "audi
visible. He says of a painting by Titian:
Si vivi espressi son gli atti e i lamenti,
ch'io vi scorgo i pensier, n'odo gli accenti.38

He also invents clever excuses why the "sounds" emitted b

ings cannot always be heard, as in these lines:
Sentirebbe l'orecchio
del sasso i colpi e de la voce il suono,
se del vicino rio
non fusse il mormorio.39

Here he creates the illusion of two distinct sounds, one being drowned
out by the other.
Another noteworthy aspect of baroque synaesthesia is that it is not
necessarily limited to the two senses of sight and hearing. The sense
of smell is sometimes included, as in this description of an idyllic mead-
ow by Pedro Soto de Rojas:
Do el olfato, la vista, y el oido
igualmente se alegran y enriquecen
con las flores, las fuentes, y el sonido.40

We note here the emphasis on the equality of the three sense percep-
tions, and on their mutual enrichment.
More sophisticated is a poem by Filippo Massini (died 1617) on a
bird in front of a mirror. After sustained emphasis on visual elements
(colors, light, reflection, the "painted image"), it ends with a surprise
metamorphosis of sound into fragrance:
Nuovo Narciso mio, volante, e vago
ch'entro a soave lume
di lusinghier cristallo,
miri de le tue piume
il nero, il verde, il giallo;
troppo, ah troppo fe' vago
de la picciola tua, dipinta imago.

37 See Albert Wellek, "Renaissance- und Barock-Synasthesie," Deutsche

Viertcljahrsschrift fur Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, IX (1931),
534-584.
38 "Maddalena," in Poesie varie, ed. Benedetto Croce (Bari, 1913), p. 243.
39 "San Girolamo," ibid., p. 247.
40 Obras, ed. A. Gallego Morell (Madrid, 1950), p. 149.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
300 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

Gia vederti mi par converso in fiore

foglie farsi le penne, e '1 canto odore.41

It has been shown elsewhere that birds, representing

in motion and thus gratifying several senses, are a f
baroque poetry.42
A synaesthetic metamorphosis in the opposite direct
to sound-is found in China. As in Massini's poem, the
involves a flower. Sophisticated literati of the Sung
poetic inspiration in the odor and even the taste of fragr
soms. One of them, the twelfth-century poet Liu H
couplet:
As with relish I chew plum buds by the little window,
Fresh verses issue from my mouth, fragrant in every word.43

The baroque poet may not even be satisfied with appealing to three
senses simultaneously. He sometimes brings all five senses into play.
This is how Markhold, the hero of Zesen's novel Adriatische Rose-
mund, describes the effect of love on his five senses:

Funf siinnen hatt' ich fohr; itzt sein sie mihr gemindert,
ihr mund entziiht den Schmak: mein Riichen wiird gehindert:
ihr aug' entauget mich; ihr siingen macht mich taub:
mein fiihlen niimmt sie wag. 0 welch ein siihBer Raub !44

A long poem by George Chapman, entitled "Ovid's Banquet of Sense,"

is divided into five parts, corresponding to the five senses. It describes
in turn the pleasures which Ovid receives with each of his senses as he
watches the beautiful Julia, daughter of Emperor Augustus, bathing in
an arbor. A similarly neat arrangement and leisurely pace are adopted
by Marino in cantos VI, VII, and VIII of his Adone, where he de-
scribes five splendid gardens, symbolizing the five senses. (Gardens,
especially baroque gardens, furnish ideal settings for poetry that deals
with the gratification of all the senses.)
Approaching the same phenomenon from a different direction, one
may say that the baroque tendency to appeal to more than one sense
is related to the sensual complexity and the sensuous intensity of
baroque art. The baroque artist may address himself to several senses
41 "Si specchia," in La poesia del seicento, ed. Giovanni Getto (Turin, 1952), p.
109.
42 See the thorough and interesting treatment of this and related subjects in
Jean Rousset, La Litterature de l'dge baroque en France: Circe et le Paon (Paris,
1953). I have dealt with one such poem in "Quevedo's Letrilla, 'Flor que cantas,
flor que vuelas...,'" Romance Philology, VI (1953), 259-264.
43 From the poem "Hsiao yen" (Small Feast), in Hsiao-shan chi (ed. in Nan-
Sung liu-shih chia chi, Ku-shu liu-t'ung ch'u reprint of Chi-ku ko ed.), fol. lb.
See also "The Plum Tree in Chinese Poetry," Asiatische Studien, VI (1952), 111,
where I have treated this matter in more detail.
44 Adriatische Rosercund, ed. A. Jellinek (Halle a. S., 1899), p. 15.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 301

simultaneously, or he may bring a wide range of stimuli to b

sense. If the poet concentrates on visual impressions, he will
out their most intensive elements-color and light-and m
great lengths to bring out their infinite variety. This trend
of course, the affinity which baroque poets felt to the art of
The following passage by William Browne exemplifies th
arrays of colors in which baroque poets like to indulge:
As in the Rainbowes many coloured hew,
Here see we watchet deepned with a blew:
There a darke tawnie with a purple mixt,
Yealow and flame, with streakes of greene betwixt,
A bloudy streame into a blushing run,
And ends still with the colour which begun;
Drawing the deeper to a lighter staine,
Bringing the lightest to the deep'st againe,
With such rare Art each mingleth with his fellow,
The blew with watchet, greene and red with yealow;
Like to the changes which we daily see
About the Doues necke with varietie,
Where none can say (though he it strict attends)
Here one begins, and there the other ends:
So did the Maidens with their various flowres
Decke vp their windowes, and make neat their bowres:
Vsing such cunning as they did dispose
The ruddy Piny with the lighter Rose,
The Moncks-hood with the Buglosse, and intwiine
The white, the blew, the flesh-like Columbine
With Pinckes, Sweet-Williams: that farre off the eye
Could not the manner of their mixtures spye.45

One notes here not only the rich variety of colors but also their constant
shifting from one shade to another, and their intermingling and blend-
ing into an artfully arranged, harmonious whole-one of the aesthetic
ideals of the baroque age.
Among the various colors, red and white-the brightest and most
intensive colors-are favorites in baroque poetry. A predilection for
red has been found in Agrippa d'Aubigne.46 Whiteness, brightness, and
light have been shown to be characteristic features of early seventeenth-
century poetry.47 Various shades and aspects of whiteness are brought
out in a poem by Antonio Basso (died 1645), "Alla rosa bianca,"48
45 Britannia's Pastorals, Book II, Song 3, in The Whole Works of William
Browne, ed. W. Carew Hazlitt (London, 1868-69), II, 37-38.
46 See Imbrie Buffum, Agrippa d'Aubigne's Les Tragiques (New Haven,
1951), pp. 77-79.
47 See Helmut Hatzfeld, "Der Barockstil der religi6sen klassischen Lyrik in
Frankreich," Literatzurvissenschaftliches Jahrbuch der Gorres-Gesellschaft, IV
(1929), 40-44; Austin Warren, Richard Crashaw (University, La., 1939), p. 185;
Wolfgang Kayser, Das sprachliche Kunstwerk, 3rd ed. (Bern, 1954), p. 124.
48 In La poesia del seicento, ed. Giovanni Getto (Turin, 1952), pp. 170-171.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
302 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

where he likens the white rose, in successive stanzas, to

snow, a silver cup, a shell, and a dove.
Several of the baroque concepts considered so far-the
literature and the figurative arts, the artist's feeling of ins
the appeal to several senses simultaneously, the search for m
and intensity-all these are connected with a fundament
trend which manifests itself in the fluidity between variou
media49 and in the groping for an all-inclusive work of art,
kunstwerk. In such an ideal creation, the borderlines bet
and painting (and other art forms) naturally vanish. Thu
liam Browne said of the harmony of colors also applies to th
diverse elements which make up the ideal baroque creati
moniously unified work of art:
Where none can say (though he it strict attends)
Here one begins, and there the other ends.

So much for the convertibility of poetry and painting in

pointed out above, a similar concept is found in Chines
from the eleventh century on. But the foundations on whic
cept was built in China differ from the European parallel in
respects.
Tools play an important role in the development of an art form, and
may even represent it to the outside world. Thus in Europe, as we have
seen, the difference between literature and painting was often sym-
bolized by the pen and the brush. In China, however, writers and
painters early came to use the same tool, the hair brush. Known in
crude form from the beginning of historical times, it was gradually de-
veloped and refined until, around the first century of the Christian era,
it had become a marvelously versatile and subtle instrument that served
both the man of letters and the painter. This unique tool, applied to the
rich potentialities of the Chinese script, caused writing to develop not
only as a utilitarian vehicle but also as a form of art, calligraphy. The
art of writing with the brush became an indispensable part of the edu-
cation of the man of letters. Naturally, the arduous technical training
required in calligraphy, with its disciplined control of brush strokes
and lines, was also an excellent preparation for painting. Thus callig-
raphy formed an important link between literature and painting.
49 "Un rasgo seicentista, bien marcado en la obra de Lope, acarre6 casi todos
sus desaciertos: aquella ilimitaci6n de los motivos artisticos por la cual todo era
utilizable para todo: una seguidilla era una comedia posible, una cornedia podia
transformarse en soneto, una chacona o una zarabanda en auto sacramental" (Jose
F. Montesinos in his introduction to Lope de Vega's Poesias liricas, Madrid,
1925-26, I, 52). "What would he [Plato] have said had he lived to see John
Dowland's Lachrymae or Seven, Teares, Figured in Seaven Passionate Pavans
(1605) or, similarly, the tombeaux of the seventeenth century, which were dirges,
frequently written en forme d'allemande, that is, in the form of a dance..." (Curt
Sachs, The Commonwealth of Art, New York, 1946, p. 230).

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 303

It is noteworthy that calligraphy and painting were v

only arts in which the literati interested themselves. Other
sculpture and architecture, which in the European Renai
respectability together with painting, were classified as cra
aeval China, as was the painting done by unlettered prof
The kind of painting done by literati, in contrast to
painting, is often described by the term zeen-jen hua (pain
man of letters, or learned man's painting). This is a usef
vided one keeps in mind the different meanings it has
reference to different periods. The term was created an
by Tung Ch'i-ch'ang (1556-1636), who applied it to his ow
School" of painting, setting it above and apart from a
School" of "academic" painters. He derived the "Souther
a straight line from Wang Wei, the great poet-painter o
century. Tung's views, significant as they are for the late
are not necessarily valid for other periods. We are concerne
the concept of painting as a special province of the man of
with the significance which this concept acquired in t
century.
As stated above, the tendency among some literati to take up paint-
ing as an avocation goes back at least to the second century of our era.
By the eleventh century, this trend had assumed such proportions that
it was no longer unusual for a man of letters to be also a painter. At the
same time, professional painters had won a greater measure of respect-
ability, and were enjoying imperial protection and favor in the painting
academies. But as the professionals developed their own theories of
academic realism and mannerism, the literati asserted their superiority,
taking advantage of the lingering prejudice against professional paint-
ing as a mere craft. They proclaimed that mastery of the brush in cal-
ligraphy and painting depends not so much on technical training as on
the cultural refinement which comes from wide reading.50 One of their
leading spokesmen, the poet-painter Su Shih, said in one of his poems:
Discarded brushes piled mountain-high are nothing to be prized,
After you read a myriad books you begin to reach the spirit.51

And in the twelfth century Teng Ch'un wrote in his book on painting:
"Rare are those who, being accomplished in literature, fail to under-
stand painting. Rare are those who, lacking accomplishment in litera-
ture, understand painting."52
Su Shih and his followers also insisted that true painting, in close
50 See T'eng Ku's article cited above (note 24); also his "Su Tung P'o als
Kunstkritiker," Ostasiatische Zeitschrift, n.s., VIII (1932), 104-110; and his
"Chinesische Malkunsttheorie der T'ang- und Sungzeit," ibid., X (1934), 157-175,
236-251, XI (1935), 28-57.
51 Tung-p'o hsien-sheng shih (ed. in Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an), 11.14a.
52 IHua chi (ed. in Hsiieh-chin t'ao-yiian, llth ser.), 9.1a-b.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
304 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

association with its sister art, poetry, must never be a sl

the objects depicted, and opposed the realism that was of
by the professional painters of the time. Su Shih sets fo
in this poem:
To criticize paintings on the basis of resemblance in appearance
Is a view that borders on childishness.
Those who write poems of such kind (of resemblance)
Are surely not men who understand poetry.
Poetry and painting are based on the same laws,
Namely, natural talent and fresh originality.53

The antirealistic trend of the literary painters was enhanced by the

gradual ascendancy of monochrome over color painting. As early as
the mid-ninth century, Chang Yen-yuan wrote: "For this reason one
may be said to have fulfilled one's aim if one can furnish (a painting)
with all the five colours by the management of ink (alone). But if one's
mind dwells on the five colours (only) then the shapes of things will
go wrong."54 From the tenth century on, there was a trend toward using
only one color or black ink alone. Thus painting was moving still closer
toward calligraphy. The literati developed a type of inspirational, im-
pressionistic painting which in their view was intimately allied to poetry
and calligraphy. They called it mo hsi (ink play), thus emphasizing
its nonprofessional, nonacademic nature. One of its pioneers, Wen
T'ung (1018-79), became famous for his bamboo paintings in black
ink. Red bamboos were first painted by Su Shih.55
In the Chinese tradition, an innovation in literature or the arts is
more easily accepted when shown to be not an innovation at all but a
continuation of respectable precedents. That is one reason why Su Shih
and other literary painters of the eleventh century took pains to estab-
lish Wang Wei as their forerunner-a role for which he seems ill fitted
on the basis of what is known about his paintings today. Often quoted
is the observation in which Su Shih epitomized his view of the con-
vertibility of poetry and painting in Wang Wei: "Savoring Wang
Wei's poems, one finds painting in his poetry. Contemplating Wang
Wei's paintings, one finds poetry in his painting."56 Similarly Ou-yang
53 Tung-p'o hsien-sheng shih, 11.29a.
54 Translation by Acker, op. cit., p. 185. Dr. Acker points out in a footnote that
"this is the first definite formulation and justification of the attitude, later so uni-
versal in China and Japan, that ink painting is essentially superior to painting
in colours."
55 See T'eng Ku, "Tuschespiele," Ostasiatische Zeitschrift, n.s., VIII (1932),
249-255.
56 Tung-p'o t'i-pa (ed. in Chin-tai pi-shu, 12th ser.), 5.1a. Following the tran-
ditional interpretation of this statement, I take it to refer to Wang Wei's poetry
and painting in general. I do not agree with Arthur Waley (An Introduction to
the Study of Chinese Painting, London, 1923, p. 144), who believes Su Shih is
merely discussing the genuineness of one particular poem and the painting on
which it is inscribed.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 305

Hsiu (1007-72), in a poem in which he discusses both pain

poetry, praises a poem by his friend Mei Yao-ch'en for co
to the supposed impressionistic spirit of the ancient masters

In ancient paintings they painted the meaning, not the appearan

Mei's poem sings of his subject with no feeling unexpressed.
Few are they who know how to forget the appearance and
to capture the meaning.
It is better to read a poem like an (ancient) painting.57

The close association which poetry and painting develo

course of many centuries manifested itself in numerous w
arts. Even at an early period, painters who were trained in
made conscious efforts to recreate favorite poems through th
of painting. For example, in the biography of the famous poe
Ku K'ai-chih (ca. 345-ca. 406) we read: "He greatly val
K'ang's four-character line poems, and took them as them
paintings. Often he commented: 'It is easy to paint his
Hand plucking the five strings,

but not his

Eyes meanwhile following the homeward-faring geese.' "58

The influence worked both ways. There is much in Chinese poetry

even before the Sung dynasty that can be explained as representing
the painter's point of view.59
The succesful combination of poetry, calligraphy, and painting often
received special notice, and matching masterpieces in these different
media were highly prized. Down to the T'ang dynasty, if one individual
was accomplished in all three arts, such versatility was noted as some-
thing extraordinary, as in the case of Cheng Ch'ien (eighth century).
His biography in the New History of the T'ang Dynasty states: "He
once wrote out some of his poems in his own handwriting, matched
them with paintings, and presented the work to the throne. The Em-
peror inscribed at the end in large letters the words: 'The three perfec-
tions of Cheng Ch'ien.' "60 Tu Fu, in a poem honoring the late Cheng
Ch'ien, also mentions this incident.61

57 Chii-shih chi (in Ou-yang Wen-chung-kung chi, ed. in Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an),

6.7b.
58 Translation by Chen Shih-hsiang, Biography of Ku K'ai-chih (Berkeley and
Los Angeles, 1953), p. 15.
59 For a good discussion of this matter, with examples, see Lin Yu-tang, "The
Technique and Spirit of Chinese Poetry," Journal of the North China Branch of
the Royal Asiatic Society, LXVI (1935), 31-41.
60 Hsin T'ang-shu (Po-na ed.), 202.11b.
61 Text in Concordance to the Poems of Tut F (Harvard-Yenching Institute
Sinological Index Series, Supp. No. 14), II, 212-213; translated by E. von Zach,
Tu Fu's Gedichte (Cambridge, Mass., 1952), pp. 475-477.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
306 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

From what has been said about the constantly closer

poetry and painting, it is understandable that in the elev
there arose the concept that the two arts may take eac
A characteristic instance occurs in a statement attributed
painter Mi Fu (1051-1107; his name is often misread
I took a walk at the lake in the moonlight with Mast
and others; every one wrote a poem, only I compose
poem."62 The term "soundless poem" as a metaphor fo
into vogue in the eleventh century. It occurs in a cou
T'ing-chien (1045-1105):
Li had verses ready but would not utter them,
With light ink he brought forth a soundless poem.63

We are reminded of Simonides' "silent poetry."

The catalogue of paintings in the imperial collection, co
the reign of Hui-tsung (1101-26), that great patron of pa
to painting and poetry as "two sides of the same thin
li).64
As a concluding example, I offer two lines from a poem by Lu Yu
(1125-1210):
The red fire in the stove is out, the ashes are like snow.
Alone with the bluish lamp, I sit and paint poetry.65

Here the emphasis on the visual elements of color (red, white, blue)
and light (fire, lamp) prepares the reader for the climax, where the
poet merges his own medium with its visual counterpart.
This paper has been limited both in range and in treatment. The
concept of the convertibility of poetry and painting has been observed
in one period of Chinese literature and in another period of Western
European literature. I have not considered the merits of the concept
itself, about which there has been much controversy in the Western
world, particularly since Lessing's Laokoon.
Several matters with which I have dealt in a summary and simplified
way, and others on which I have touched only slightly or not at all,
could profitably be studied in more detail. One could show, for instance,
how the concept of the affinity of two media developed in conformity
with certain formal patterns, such as parallelism (both in verse and in
prose) in China, paradox and antithesis in the West. One could fur-
ther show that some of the phenomena found in the relationship be-
tween poetry and painting apply also to other media. It is known that
baroque poetry reached over not only into painting but also into music.
62 Teng Ch'un, Hua chi (ed. in Hsiieh-chin t'ao-yiian, 11th ser.), 3.4b-5a.
63 Yii-chang Huang hsien-sheng wen-chi (ed. in Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an), 5.7a.
Li is the poet-painter Li Kung-lin (died 1106).
64 Hsiian-ho hua-p'u (ed. in Hsiieh-chin t'ao-yiian, 11th ser.), 15.lb.
65 Ching-hsiian Lu Fang-weng shih-chi (ed. in Ssit-pt ts'ung-k'an)), 7.49a.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 POETRY AND PAINTING 307

In the Spanish Rom,ancero nuevo, fo

dispensable element.66 Similarly in Ch
tz'u, arose in the tenth and eleventh c
as equal partners.
The baroque conception of a Gesam
the typical baroque castle with its surro
and above all in the Italian opera.67 But
There is no parallel in Western civilizat
tion, mutual inspiration, and blending
cultivated by the Chinese literati for ma

University of California, Berkeley

66 See Jose F. Montesinos, "Algunos pr

RP, VI (1953), 234-238.
67 See Carl J. Friedrich, The Age of the B
pp. 40, 83; Curt Sachs, The Commonwealth
passim.

This content downloaded from

198.40.30.37 on Sat, 10 Apr 2021 21:28:54 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms