Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Traditional and New Developed Root Sealers Against Pathogens Related Root Canal
Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Traditional and New Developed Root Sealers Against Pathogens Related Root Canal
Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Traditional and New Developed Root Sealers Against Pathogens Related Root Canal
ScienceDirect
Original Article
a
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Korea University Medical Center Guro Hospital, Republic of
Korea
b
Department of Orthodontics, Korea University Medical Center Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of
Korea
c
Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University,
Cheonan, Republic of Korea
KEYWORDS Abstract Background/purpose: Bacterial infection is closely associated with the failure of
Root canal sealer; endodontic treatment, and use of endodontic sealer with antimicrobial activity and biological
Antimicrobial compatibility is necessary for the success of root canal treatment. The purpose of this study
activity; was to investigate and to compare the antibacterial effect of two calcium silicate-based root
Oxide compound; canal sealers (Endoseal and EndoSequence BC sealer) as recent development sealers and with
E. faecalis three conventional root canal sealers (AH Plus, Sealapex, and Tubli-Seal), before or after
setting, on Porphyromonas endodontalis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Enterococcus faeca-
lis.
Materials and methods: The sealers were soaked in phosphate buffered saline to elute its com-
positions after and before setting, and the elutes were performed the antimicrobial assay.
Also, X-ray fluorescence analysis was carried out to compare compositions of two calcium
silicate-based sealers.
Results: The conventional root canal sealers have strong antibacterial activity against the
Gram-negative bacteria, P. endodontalis and P. gingivalis. Endoseal sealer showed antibacte-
rial activity against not only the Gram-negative bacteria, but also against the Gram-positive
bacteria, E. faecalis. However, Endosequence BC sealer exhibited a weak antibacterial effect
on all bacteria in this study. X-ray fluorescence analysis exhibited that Endoseal contained
more types and more amount of the oxide compound known to have strong antimicrobial
activity such as Al2O3, Fe2O3, MgO, Na2O, NiO, and SO2 than Endoseqeunce BC.
Conclusion: Endoseal, which contains various types of oxide compounds, seems to be a suit-
able sealer for preventing bacterial infection in both treated and untreated root canals.
* Corresponding author. Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, 119 Dandae-ro,
Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea. Fax: þ82 41 550 1859.
E-mail address: [email protected] (S.-H. Lee).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.10.007
1991-7902/ª 2018 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC
BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Comparison of antimicrobial activity 55
ª 2018 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This
is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Figure 1 The antibacterial activity of traditional and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers against E. faecalis. The eluate
from traditional and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers before (A) or after setting (B) was prepared using a PBS, and
E. faecalis was cultivated with and without the prepared eluate of various sealers at various concentrations in a 96-well polystyrene
plate. The growth of E. faecalis was measured using a microplate reader at 600 nm. The experiments were conducted three times
in duplicate, and data are represented as the mean S.D. * Statistically significant differences compared with cultures not treated
with the spent culture medium (p < 0.05).
Comparison of antimicrobial activity 57
Figure 2 The antibacterial activity of traditional and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers against P. endodontalis. The
eluate from traditional and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers before (A) or after setting (B) was prepared using a PBS, and
P. endodontalis was cultivated with and without the prepared elute of various sealers at various concentrations in a 96-well
polystyrene plate under anaerobic conditions. The growth of P. endodontalis was measured using a microplate reader at
600 nm. The experiments were conducted three times in duplicate, and data are represented as the mean S.D. * Statistically
significant difference compared with cultures not treated with the spent culture medium (p < 0.05).
oxide, and silcon dioxide in Endoseal were detected than and their antibacterial activity against some Gram-positive
EndoSequence BC sealer. bacteria, including E. faecalis, has been examined.13,14
However, other bacteria, such as P. gingivalis and P. endo-
dontalis, are related to pulpal inflammations, and the
Discussion antibacterial activity of the sealers after setting has not
been evaluated. Therefore, this study investigated and
Control of the bacteria determines the success or failure of compared the antibacterial activity of traditional sealers
root canal treatment. Although, chemomechanical proced- and calcium silicate-based sealers against P. gingivalis,
ures, cleaning, and disinfectant treatment are performed to P. endodontalis, and E. faecalis before and after setting.
reduce the number of bacteria when treating the root canal, In the susceptibility test, before setting, the traditional
some bacteria often remain in the root canal systems.6 sealers showed stronger antimicrobial activity on P. gingivalis
Therefore, the root-filling materials with antibacterial and P. endodontalis than the calcium silicate-based. Endo-
activity are required and are advantageous. Recently, cal- seal showed the strongest antibacterial activity against
cium silicate-based root canal sealers have been developed, E. faecalis, whereas, Endosequence BC sealer showed weak
Figure 3 The susceptibility of P. gingivalis for various root canal sealers. The eluate from traditional and calcium silicate-based
root canal sealers before (A) or after setting (B) was prepared using a PBS, and P. gingivalis was cultivated with and without the
prepared eluate of various sealers at various concentration in a 96-well polystyrene plate under anaerobic conditions. The growth
of P. gingivalis was measured using a microplate reader at 600 nm. The experiments were conducted three times in duplicate, and
data are represented as the mean S.D. * Statistically significant differences compared with cultures not treated with the spent
culture medium (p < 0.05).
58 J.-H. Shin et al
6. Ozcan E, Eldeniz AU, Ari H. Bacterial killing by several root 16. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activ-
filling materials and methods in an ex vivo infected root canal ity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:147e79.
model. Int Endod J 2011;44:1102e9. 17. Lim ES, Park YB, Kwon YS, Shon WJ, Lee KW, Min KS. Physical
7. Zmener O. Evaluation of the apical seal obtained with two properties and biocompatibility of an injectable calcium-
calcium hydroxide based endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 1987; silicate-based root canal sealer: in vitro and in vivo study.
20:87e90. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:129.
8. von Fraunhofer JA, Branstetter J. The physical properties of 18. Siqueira Jr JF, Lopes HP. Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of
four endodontic sealer cements. J Endod 1982;8:126e30. calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int Endod J 1999;32:361e9.
9. Mutoh N, Satoh T, Watabe H, Tani-Ishii N. Evaluation of the 19. Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Ashkarran AA, et al. Antibacterial
biocompatibility of resin-based root canal sealers in rat peri- properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol 2012;30:499e511.
apical tissue. Dent Mater J 2013;32:413e9. 20. Catauro M, Raucci MG, De Gaetano F, Marotta A. Antibacterial
10. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Brady K, Sweeney R, Curtis RV, and bioactive silver-containing Na2O x CaO x 2SiO2 glass prepared
Ford TR. The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent by sol-gel method. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:831e7.
Mater 2005;21:297e303. 21. Fang TJ, Dalmasso JP. Antimicrobial activity of sulfur dioxide to
11. Maroto M, Barberia E, Planells P, Garcia Godoy F. Dentin bridge certain lactic acid bacteria isolated from wines. Zhonghua Min
formation after mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi 1993;26(3):116e31.
in primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005;18:151e4. 22. Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Habib SS, Memic A.
12. Aminozarbian MG, Barati M, Salehi I, Mousavi SB. Biocompati- Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against
bility of mineral trioxide aggregate and three new endodontic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative
cements: an animal study. Dent Res J 2012;9:54e9. study. Int J Nanomed 2012;7:6003e9.
13. Jafari F, Samadi Kafil H, Jafari S, Aghazadeh M, Momeni T. 23. Gajan EB, Aghazadeh M, Abashov R, Salem Milani A, Moosavi Z.
Antibacterial activity of MTA fillapex and AH 26 root canal Microbial flora of root canals of pulpally-infected teeth:
sealers at different time intervals. Iran Endod J 2016;11:192e7. Enterococcus faecalis a prevalent species. J Dent Res Dent Clin
14. Singh G, Gupta I, Elshamy FM, Boreak N, Homeida HE. In vitro Dent Prospects 2009;3:24e7.
comparison of antibacterial properties of bioceramic-based 24. Camargo CH, Camargo SE, Valera MC, Hiller KA, Schmalz G,
sealer, resin-based sealer and zinc oxide eugenol based Schweikl H. The induction of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and
sealer and two mineral trioxide aggregates. Eur J Dermatol genotoxicity by root canal sealers in mammalian cells. Oral
2016;10:366e9. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:952e60.
15. Leonardo MR, Bezerra da Silva LA, Filho MT, Santana da Silva R. 25. Pires CW, Botton G, Cadona FC, et al. Induction of cytotoxicity,
Release of formaldehyde by 4 endodontic sealers. Oral Surg oxidative stress and genotoxicity by root filling pastes used in
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:221e5. primary teeth. Int Endod J 2016;49:737e45.