Lecture 2 - CSME and The Caribbean Court of Justice
Lecture 2 - CSME and The Caribbean Court of Justice
Lecture 2 - CSME and The Caribbean Court of Justice
The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) & the CARICOM Single Market & Economy (CSME)
The CSME is a single enlarged economic space created through the removal of restrictions
and resulting in the free movement of: Goods; Services; Persons; Capital; Technology
It confers the right on CARICOM nationals to establish business in any CARICOM Member
State and to be treated in the same manner as a national of that State
• Provision for the free movement of Goods, Services and People within the CSME
• A common currency
Rights of CARICOM Nationals under the CSME
Access to land, building and other property for the purpose of establishing a
business.
Freedom of entry for managerial, supervisory and technical staff, spouse and
immediate dependent family members
Role of the CCJ: Agreement establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice signed on 14 th
February 20012 as inter alia
14th February 2001: Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica,
St. Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago,
15th February 2003: Dominica and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
2
Jurisdiction – Appellate
• Replacing the Privy Council for Barbados, Belize, Dominica (and the others who will join)
Jurisdiction – Original
Exclusive Arbiter: The Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas provides for the establishment of the
Caribbean Court of Justice to have exclusive and compulsory jurisdiction in interpreting and
applying the provisions of the Treaty.
• Why is the CCJ essential? The original jurisdiction of the Caribbean Court of Justice is
essential for the successful operation of the CSME.
The CCJ will provide legal certainty and member states will be compelled to adhere to
the principles and obligations enshrined in the revised treaty
• Both the investor and consumer will have greater confidence in the predictability and
fairness in the application of measures relating to the CCJ. There will be disputes and
disputes must be settled with certainty.
3
Accessing the Original Jurisdiction
There are four (4) ways to access the original jurisdiction of the Court:
2. by way of referral: Article 214 of the Treaty deals with referrals as does Article
XIV of the Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice and Part
11.2(1) of the Original Jurisdiction Rules 2006.
Referrals from other Courts: Article 14 – Agreement Establishing the Court: National
courts or tribunals e.g. - High Courts and Magistrates Courts also includes Tax Appeal
Board, Industrial Court and the Environmental Commission could refer issues dealing
with the interpretation or application of the Treaty of Chaguaramas to the CCJ. It must
be before judgment is delivered. The interpretation of the Treaty or judgment of the CCJ
is final.
4
3. By way of advisory opinion: This is a route which can be used for Member States
to ascertain the situation where there is doubt. The Member States parties to a
dispute must make a joint request in writing for an advisory opinion. Article 212
of the Treaty:
“1. The Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to deliver advisory opinions concerning
the interpretation and application of the Treaty
2. Advisory opinions shall be delivered only at the request of the Member States parties
to a dispute or the Community.”
• This request must be sent to the Registrar of the CCJ and must be accompanied by all
documents relevant to the issue.
• Member states
• The Community
a) Who can bring matters to the CCJ- original jurisdiction CCJ says that Treaty
intended that a right or benefit should extend to benefit of persons directly;
b) The person show they have been prejudiced in respect of such a right or benefit;
5
• The Competition Commission is established by Article 171 of the Treaty and its functions
set out in Article 173 (1). Articles 175 (11) 5, (12)6 and 180 (3)7 provide that the
Commission may approach the CCJ for certain Orders or for review of its
determinations.
5. The CCJ’s jurisdiction is final, there is no appeal from the Court’s decision. Again,
this ensures legal certainty and uniformity.