Integrated Fish Farming: Principles, Advantages and Disadvantages
Integrated Fish Farming: Principles, Advantages and Disadvantages
Integrated Fish Farming: Principles, Advantages and Disadvantages
Integrated fish farming is based on the concept that ‘there is no waste’, and waste is only a
misplaced resource which can become a valuable material for another product (FAO, 1977). In
integrated farming, the basic principles involve the utilisation of the synergetic effects of inter-
related farm activities and the conservation, including the full utilisation of farm wastes.
It is assumed that all the constituents of the system would benefit from such a combination.
However, in most cases, the main beneficiary is the fishes which utilises the animal and
agricultural wastes directly or indirectly as food. As integrated farming involves the recycling of
wastes, it has been considered an economic and efficient means of environmental management.
1. Paddy-Cum-Fish Culture:
Rice fields which are water-logged for 3-8 months in a year, there is always small population of
fishes that gain access to such waters. This probably had given rise to the practice of deliberate
stocking of fishes and harvesting. The trapping of prawns and fishes with the help of ‘gamcha or
dhoti’ in fallow paddy-fields has been an age old practice in India.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
The culture of fishes in paddy-fields has been an off-season occupation for farmers:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(2) In areas where rice and fish form the staple food, paddy-field aquaculture makes available an
essential diet for the people.
(3) As paddy and fish can be grown either simultaneously or alternately in the same water mass,
it requires very little extra input by way of additional costs, particularly in management and
labour.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(5) Combination of paddy and fish farming is mutually beneficial. Fish cultivation promotes
better paddy production by way of exercising an effective control on unwanted weeds, molluscs,
noxious insects and their larval stages.
All fishes are not suitable for such a type of culture as paddy-fields provide special ecological
conditions such as shallow turbid water with high temperature.
Fishes having the following criteria are generally selected for paddy-cum-fish culture:
(1) Fishes that can adapt to shallow waters necessary for paddy crops.
(3) Fishes that can thrive on low dissolved oxygen, which is the characteristic of paddy-fields
especially in tropical countries.
(5) As the duration of culture is quite short, fishes that have high growth rate is to be selected, so
that it can reach marketable size within these few months.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(6) Fishes that can live in confinement and do not tend to escape from the cultivated area.
Fishes that are cultured in such waters in India are Mugil sp., Mystus gulio, Haplochromis
mellandi (mollusc eating fish), hates calcarifer, Mugil parsia, Puntius sp., Channa sp., prawns
and shrimps. In India, limited experimental works have shown the suitability of Indian carps for
such integrated farming.
To increase the utility of paddy-fields as fish ponds, the following managements are
required:
(1) A continuous flow of water in the field, with proper inlet and outlet is to be maintained.
(2) The water in the field is to be maintained at a desired level.
(3) Proper drainage of water from the field has to be made in case of flooding.
(4) At the point of entry and exit of water, some control means (such as screens) have to be
provided to prevent the cultivated species from escaping and stopping the entry of wild fishes
into the paddy-field.
(5) Deep pits or other devices has to be provided as shelter to the cultivated fishes at the time of
distress.
In such farming paddy and fish are grown together and harvesting the paddy and fish at the end
of the rice-growing season.
Literature reveals that a variety of techniques and stocking rates have been employed in different
countries on paddy-field aquaculture. In general, fishes are stocked not earlier than 5 days after
transplantation of paddy seedlings, so as to enable the seedlings to form proper root. After
transplantation of paddy, stocking in case of fry should be done after 10 days, while for
fingerlings after 3 weeks.
The methods of culture adopted are for production of either fingerlings or fish for consumption.
Farmers generally cultivate local varieties of paddy which takes up to 6 months to be harvested,
so that more than one crop per year can be grown. Generally organic manures are preferred over
the use of fertilisers in the preparation of the paddy-fields.
(2) Fishes contribute to the enhancement of paddy production by destroying weeds, causing
tillering and mineral enrichment by their digging activity, and for the fertilisation of soil by their
excrement and also by the unutilised artificial feed.
(1) The water depth being shallow hinders better fish raising.
(2) For fear of harmful effect on fishes, herbicides and insecticides uses in paddy-field is gener-
ally prevented which ultimately limits paddy production.
(3) Due to abrupt changes in temperature and dissolved oxygen, inadequate space and presence
of piscivore birds, there is great loss of fishes which may be about 20-60%.
Progressive agricultural areas have slowly discarded paddy-fish cultivation in favour of the
rotation of paddy and fish crops.
It is the simplest form, where flooded paddy-fields after harvest are used to raise one or more
crops of fish or shrimp.
In rotation system the paddy-field has to be prepared for raising fishes after the harvest of rice.
To maintain the required depth of water the bunds surrounding the field have to be raised. After
harvesting the rice, the stubbles are not removed.
These submerged stubbles provide the substrate for the development of fish food organisms.
These stubbles undergo decomposition, thereby fertilising the water and stimulating higher
productivity. After fish harvesting, the residues remain in the soil which in turn serves as
fertiliser for the paddy crop.
Shrimp production in paddy-fields is generally practised in areas (generally in the west coast and
deltaic areas of eastern India) where only one crop (July to September) of a salt-resistant variety
of paddy is grown. Following the harvesting of rice, the bundhs are strengthened and sluice gates
are installed to control the water supply.
At high tides, the fields are filled with tidal water, containing a large number of shrimp larvae.
These larvae gain access to the fields, where they find food and shelter. To attract the larval
shrimps, lamps are hung above the inlets.
By this process, natural stocking of shrimp larvae is done at every high tide for two to three
months. To prevent the escape of juvenile shrimps at low tides, conical bag-nets are attached to
the sluice gates.
Shrimp harvesting from these fields starts in December, as by this time the early stock of shrimps
will have attained marketable size. Regular harvesting is done which results in thinning of the
stock, leading to better growth rate and harvesting of larger shrimps. The total yield of shrimp is
around 780-2100 kg per hectare.
Advantages of Paddy-Fish Rotation:
(1) There is no water depth limitation either to paddy or fish cultivation. Shallow water depth is
maintained till the harvesting of paddy, after which the water depth is raised for the culture of
fishes.
(2) Through this adequate water level management, suitable water temperature and dissolved
oxygen content can be maintained.
(3) After harvesting of paddy, the submerged stubbles decompose and fertilise the water. This
leads to the development of fish food organisms and ultimately stimulates higher productivity.
(4) The interval between paddy harvesting and fish stocking is sufficient enough to allow
degradation of pesticides.
(5) Insect pest infestation gets reduced as their life-cycles are disrupted.
Due to presence of piscivorous birds like herons, cormorants, etc., considerable loss of fish (20-
60%) takes place.
This system is much complicated and it ensures prolonged period of fish culture. It involves
transferring the stock of fishes to specially prepared ditches, channels or pools at the time of
paddy harvest and re-stocking them in the field for a further growing period. This system
provides better growth rate than what is possible in such a short duration of one paddy crop.
For such a cultivation the farm should have additional holding or rearing facilities for the period
between paddy harvesting and planting of new fish seedlings. The carps or shrimps can be grown
to the required size through adequate feeding. This culture involves higher inputs including
labour.
2. Duck-Cum-Fish Farming:
Although duck and fish farming have been in practice in eastern Europe and China and their
compatible nature being recognised since long, the interaction and benefits of the association
have been understood only a few years back.
During the last decade suitable methods have been developed in various countries for raising
ducks in fish ponds. Undoubtedly, such a combined culture is highly profitable as it greatly
increases the production of protein in terms of fish and duck per unit area.
The combination of duck and fish farming is seen presently as a means of reducing the cost of
feed for ducks, at one hand, and on the other, the excreta of ducks acts in an inexpensive way of
fertilising ponds, which results in production of fish food organisms.
Thus, ducks can be said to be ‘living manuring machines’. The duck droppings contain 25 per
cent organic and 20 per cent inorgaic substances along with a number of elements such as
carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, etc.
Moreover, ducks by agitating the shore areas of the pond, help to release nutrients. Besides this,
ducks feed on a variety of organisms such as weeds, snails, unwanted harmful insects and their
larvae (some being vectors of fish pathogenic organisms), tadpoles, frogs and water-borne
disease-causing organisms infecting man, whose eradication is one of the important aspects of
farm management.
Ponds provide a clean and healthy environment for ducks. Special strains of ducks have been
developed that are suited for pond raising. Such suitable strains when used, approximately 50-60
per cent of their droppings when falls into the pond, is sufficient to fertilise the water.
Reliable and timely supply of required strains of good quality ducklings are of great significance
as it promotes successful farming. For supply of ducklings, small scale farmers have to depend
on outside sources, while larger farms have their own breeding centres which is much convenient
and profitable.
In extensive raising ducks are stocked at approximately 150-500 per hectare of pond surface.
Here small amount of supplementary feed is provided and the number of ducks is limited due to
the food they can find in the pond water. As the number of ducks are limited, they contribute
little amount of manure to the pond and its effect on fish yield is also limited. Such a type of
method is usually employed in Europe.
Here ducks are stocked at a much higher density, approximately 1000-2500 per hectare of pond
surface and is usually employed in Africa. The ducks are fed at the same rates as on land. As
ducks are held at a much higher density per unit area, higher amounts of manure are thus loaded
into the fish pond which subsequently results in higher yields.
(b) Duck Keeping:
Here the ducks are allowed to have free access to the whole pond (Fig. 6.43). As they are
allowed to swim freely around the whole pond surface, a good proportion of their droppings fall
directly into the pond water and are distributed more or less uniformly.
The ducks are able to forage around the whole pond. Adjacent to the ponds, small duck houses
are built with facilities for providing them with supplementary feed. In this system, as
considerable energy is spent by the ducks in swimming activity, it is believed to affect the feed
conversion ratio and growth rate of the ducks.
Here, part of the pond area and the adjacent land area are enclosed with wire fences (Fig. 6.44).
About one-fourth of the enclosure will be on the land and the rest in water. Within the wire fence
suitable feeding and resting areas are made.
Some of the droppings of the duck falls directly into the pond water, while the rest that drops on
land is washed down into the pond. Under this system fish production is reported to be almost
equal to the free-range system. Keeping ducks in enclosures is preferred by most farmers, who
use special strains of ducks for better growth.
For duck-fish farming the most suitable pond is the barrage type of ponds. This is made by
damming shallow valleys, so that the ducks can lie on the natural slopes. There is every likely-
hood that ducks may damage the earthen dykes while foraging. The problem can be solved with
proper maintenance.
Commonly the fish species cultured are herbivores and omnivores. The common carp was
traditionally the main species but subsequently other species of Chinese carps are used to make
full use of the food resources. Other important species used are male or hybrid tilapia, grey
mullet, catla, eel, asian catfish and sea perch. Fairly high stocking rates are adopted and
supplementary food is also provided.
(i) Advantages:
(1) There is practically less additional cost for fish culture, as the excreta of the ducks fertilises
the pond water.
(2) Ducks by agitating the shore areas of the ponds help to release nutrients.
(ii) Disadvantages:
(1) The fingerlings released should be of more than 10 cm size, otherwise the ducks may feed on
the fingerlings.
(2) While foraging for food, ducks sometimes damages the earthen dykes. This problem can be
solved with proper maintenance.
3. Fish-Cum-Poultry Farmings:
Integrated fish farming with poultry is generally cultured as the poultry manure is a very efficient
fertilizer for fish ponds. The poultry droppings comprises 2% nitrogen, 1.25% phosphoric acid
and 0.75% potash. The low feeding cost per individual bird makes poultry farming along with
fish, a common investment for poor farmers.
Both ‘broilers’ and ‘layers’ variety of chicken can be raised for fish-poultry farming. One day
old chick are raised up to the pullet stage after which they are put in layer cages.
Fish culture with both intensive and extensive poultry productions have been integrated succes-
sfully. The most intensive type of poultry production is the battery type of housing, which is
installed by the side of the pond. The floor of the house is cemented and is set up at a slope so
that the eggs may roll forward.
For layers, the floor area required is about 30 cm2 while for broilers, 15-20 cm2. The usual floor
space allotted for each bird is 20 x 30 x 40 cm. The birds are confined to cages which are made
up of standard, stout, galvanised wire. The cages are kept on trays for collection of droppings.
For further on poultry refer chapter 5.
For manuring one hectare pond water, the droppings of about 250 layers and four batches of 200
broilers each are adequate in a year’s time.
For fish raising the ponds are stocked with fingerlings of catla, silver carp, common carp,
murrels, tilapia, giant freshwater prawns, etc. The stocking density of fishes is related with that
of poultry and also with the period of culture.
In one hectare pond area, when stocked with 5000 giant freshwater prawns (Macrobrachium
rosenbergii) and 1500 silver carp, and cultured for a period of four months, one can harvest 600
kg of prawns and an equal amount of fish, along with 250 culled birds.
For culturing over a period of one year, ponds may be stocked with fingerlings of catla, common
carp, silver carp and grass carp at a density of 5000-6000 fingerlings per hectare. At the end of
twelve months of fish-cum-poultry culture, fish yield of over 3900 kg per hectare can be
normally obtained along with 42,000 eggs and 200 culled birds.
(i) Advantages:
(1) Chicken manure is a very efficient fertiliser, so no chemical fertiliser is needed for fertilising
the pond water. This cuts down the expenditure of rearing fishes.
(4) Chicks are readily available and their productivity can be improved with simple and cheap
management.
(ii) Disadvantages:
(1) Chicks should be examined from time to time and diseased one should be isolated, otherwise
they will destroy the entire stock.
(2) Sufficient time should be given from one stocking of chicks to the next for renovation of the
house and disinfectioning it.
4. Kish-Cum-Pig Culture:
In integrated fish farming with pig, the ‘pig dung’ is useful for conditioning the soil and
providing the necessary nutrients required for fertilising the pond water. Fish-cum-pig culture is
practised at large in China where pigs are considered as “costless fertiliser factories”.
Pig dung contains about 70 percent digestible feed for fishes. The feed while passing down the
pig’s alimentary canal, gets mixed up with enzymes which continue to act even after defecation.
Such undigested solids serve as direct food source for tilapia and common carp.
In tropical fish ponds, weeds are a major problem in fish culture. Such vegetation’s are
considered as valuable food resource for pigs.
In fish-cum-pig culture the embankments of fish ponds are made wider (over 10 m in China) to
facilitate the building of pig sites and also for growing vegetables, fruit trees or other crops. In
the slopes, grasses can also be grown which is used as fodder for grass carp and for other farm
animals.
Various aquatic plants, such as azolla, duck weed, Pistia, Wolffia, Lemna, and water hyacinth
(Eichhor-nia) are grown in feeder channels and irrigation ditches associated with the pond farms.
These and the foliage of other terrestrial plants (vegetables, rice, corn, etc.) are used for feeding
the pigs.
In the water area of the pond, about 10 tons of aquatic plants can be produced, which are
sufficient to feed 10 pigs. These plant materials are generally mixed with bananas, coconut meal,
rice bran, soybean wastes, groundnut cakes, fish meal, etc.
Pig sites or pen or sty are generally built on nearby land or on the pond embankment. The pen
enclosure is built not only for pig raising but also special consideration is given to the needs for
breeding, nursing and fattening activities. Pig pen generally have a system of channels for
transferring the organic matter into the pond water.
Alternatively, the sty or pen may be constructed above the pond water. The structure is made of
wood and provided with a lattice type of floor which permits the excreta and uneaten food to fall
directly into the pond water.
Modern practices are to avoid direct washing of the wastes into the pond. The urine and dung of
pigs are first allowed to the oxidation tanks (digestion chambers) where sedimentation and
fermentation of the manure take place. The supernatant liquid, at regular intervals, are then
discharged into the fish ponds.
The sludge that remains is utilised as fertilisers in agriculture. Alternatively the pig manure may
be kept in a heap on the pond embankment for later use. The chemical composition of pig wastes
is depicted in Table 6.13.
The number of pigs to be raised per hectare and the manuring rates to be applied are based on
years of experience. The production of manure depends upon the age and size of the pig. A piglet
produces about 3.4 kg manure a day, while a one-year-old pig gives about 12.5 kg a day.
The average production of faeces and urine per pig is about 7.8-8 tons per annum. A density of
60-100 pigs has been found to be sufficient to fertilise a one hectare fish pond.
Polyculture is commonly practised in such integrated farming due to the variety of food that
becomes available in the pond. Herbivorous and omnivorous fishes are used for culture;
generally common and Chinese carps and less frequently catfishes (Pangasius), Indian carps and
tilapia.
Due to high productivity of the ponds, fairly high rates of stocking are generally practised —
60,000 fingerlings of different species (weighing 20-30 gm) per hectare.
The duration of culture of fishes and pigs varies. Generally it is about one year, but culture for 6
months duration is also practised. The overall economics of combined fish and pig rearing
depends on the local conditions. However, the pigs are generally sold when they have attained a
weight of 90-100 kg. The production of fish generally varies between 2 and 18 tons per hectare
per annum.
(i) Advantages:
(1) Such integrated farming increases the productivity per area and thus, the farmers income
becomes doubled or more.
(2) Pig dung conditions the soil of a new pond and provides ready-made organic matter, contain-
ing the necessary nutrients.
(3) Pig dung contains about 70 per cent digestible feed for fishes. The undigested solids present
in the faeces of pig serves as direct feed source for tilapia and common carp.
(4) Pigs aptly plays a role in biological control of weeds, as weeds are considered as valuable
food source for pigs.
(ii) Disadvantages:
(1) Addition of too much pig manure may lead to increased nutrient load resulting in pollution of
the water body and mortality of the fishes.
(2) Considerable care and management skills are required to prevent pollution. It has been found
that satisfactory fish production can be obtained with much lower manuring.
Cattle wastes and washings from the cattle sheds are conveyed through pipes into the ponds
which acts as good fertiliser. Cattle wastes are generally collected in a pit for later use. In
addition to fish yield, production of milk from cattle and beef adds to the economy.
Rabbit farming has been found to be ideal for integration with small- scale fish culture. Rabbit
manure have greater value as a direct food for fish compared to other livestock wastes.
Mulberry plants are raised on the dikes of the fish farm and in the neighbouring fields for
silkworm production. The mulberry wastes and silkworm larvae and pupae (after removal of
silk) are used as feed for the fishes. It also fertilises the pond water.
(5) It gives higher and stable farm productivity and there is less risk (biologically and econo-
mically).
Recently, controversy has arisen among scientists on the public health aspects of integrated
farming. Speculations are ripe that integrated fish farming with pigs and poultry may be a cause
of influenza pandemic. This may be, as the pigs would act as ‘mixing vessels’ for avian and
human influenza viruses, it can create new lethal strains of viruses by mutation.
In such an act, fishes themselves do not play any role. However, there is no conclusive evidence
that integrated farming can become a public health hazard. For safety measures, pig-poultry
combinations in integrated fish culture should thus be avoided.
Related Articles:
Before publishing your Notes on this site, please read the following pages:
1. Content Guidelines
2. Privacy Policy
3. TOS
4. Disclaimer Copyright
Advertisements
About Us