Pone 0230978
Pone 0230978
Pone 0230978
RESEARCH ARTICLE
1 College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Samara University, Samara, Ethiopia, 2 Translational Health
a1111111111
Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia, 3 School of Science and
a1111111111 Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia, 4 Oral Health Services, Sydney Local
a1111111111 Health District and Sydney Dental Hospital, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia, 5 Discipline of Child and
a1111111111 Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney,
a1111111111 Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6 General Practice Unit, Prescot Specialist Medical Centre Makurdi, Makurdi,
Benue State, Nigeria
OPEN ACCESS
Demographic Health Survey. Information on the ARI (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.68). Early initiation of breastfeeding and EBF were associ-
data and content can be accessed at https:// ated with lower odds of diarrhoea (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.94 for Early initiation of breast-
dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm. The
authors did not have special access privileges.
feeding and OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.65 for EBF). Infants who were predominantly
breastfed were less likely to experience diarrhoea (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.89).
Funding: This study received no grant from any
funding agency in public, commercial or not for
profit sectors. Conclusion
Competing interests: The authors declare that they The recommended best practices for preventing ARI and diarrhoeal diseases in infants and
have no competing interests. young children namely: the early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF and avoidance of bottle
Abbreviations: ANC, Antenatal Care; ARI, Acute feeding should be institutionalized and scale-up in Ethiopia as part of implementation sci-
Respiratory Infection; OR, Odds Ratio; BFHI, Baby- ence approach to cover the know-do-gaps.
Friendly Hospital Initiative; CI, Confidence Interval;
CSA, Central Statistics Agency; DHS, Demographic
and Health Survey; EA, Enumeration Areas; EBF,
Exclusive Breastfeeding; EIBF, Early Initiation of
Breastfeeding; EDHS, Ethiopian Demographic and
Health Survey; HSTP, Health Sector Introduction
Transformation Plan; ICF, Inner City Fund; IYCF,
Acute respiratory infection (ARI) and diarrhoea are the leading causes of childhood morbidity
Infant and Young Child Feeding; JMP, Joint
Monitoring Program; MDG, Millennium
and mortality globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1–3]. In
Development Goal; NRERC, National Research 2015, ARI and diarrhoea were the first and the fourth leading causes of childhood mortality
Ethics Review Committee; PNC, Postnatal Care; worldwide, attributable to over one million global under-five deaths [1, 2]. Previous studies
PSM, Propensity Score Matching; SMD, have shown that childhood ARI and diarrhoea were associated with adverse health and devel-
Standardized Mean Difference; SDG, Sustainable opmental outcomes [4–8]. ARI and diarrhoea in children have been associated with frequent
Development Goals; SNNPR, Southern Nations
hospital visits and admission [6]. Studies conducted in LMICs have shown that early initiation
Nationalities and Peoples Regions; UNICEF, United
Nation Children’s Fund; USAID, United States of breastfeeding (EIBF) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) were protective against diarrhoea
Agency for International Development; USD, United [9–14] and ARI [9, 10].
States Dollar; VIP, Ventilated Improved Pit; WASH, Evidence from sub-Saharan African [11, 13, 15] and Asian [10, 16] countries have indicated
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene; WHO, World Health that inappropriate introduction of complementary foods and bottle feeding were associated
Organization.
with the onset of diarrhoea among infants and young children. This is potentially due to the
replacement of irreplaceable human milk by complementary foods and contamination of the
food and/or teat/nipple of the bottle [17, 18]. Despite the benefits of appropriate breastfeeding,
EIBF and EBF prevalence estimates remain low in LMICs, 42% [19] and 37% [14], respectively.
This suggests that many infants and young children are at increased risk of experiencing ARI
and diarrhoea, and even more likely to die from preventable and treatable diseases like ARI
and diarrhoea [1–3].
Based on the World Bank assessment [20], Ethiopia is a low-income country, with strong
and broad-based economic growth compared to other nations in the Eastern African region.
However, it is one of the poorest countries in Africa, with a per capita income of USD790 per
year [20], indicating that access to key social and health amenities that can help to reduce pre-
ventable child morbidity and mortality are limited. In the past two decades, Ethiopia has seen
substantial reductions in infant mortality (from 97 in 2000 to 43 per 1000 in 2019) and under-
five mortality (from 166 in 2000 to 55 per 1000 in 2019) [21, 22]. Despite these improvements,
one in 15 children still dies before reaching age five years, and 7 out of 10 of these deaths occur
in the first year of birth [21, 23–25]. In these deaths, childhood vaccination and appropriate
IYCF practices could play important roles in preventive strategies; however, recent studies
have indicated that vaccination coverage (43%) [22] and IYCF practices (e.g., EIBF (75.5%)
and EBF at six months (59.9%) [26]) were below the Ethiopian Health Sector Transformation
Plan target of 95%, 90% and 72%, respectively [27]. Additionally, a recent study indicated that
early cessation of EBF was associated with ARI and diarrhoea [32]. Though useful, this study
did not provide relevant evidence for other important IYCF indicators, including EIBF,
predominant breatfeeding and introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods. These indicators
have been showed to either act as ‘protective’ or ‘predictive’ factors for both ARI and diarhoea
in LMICs [10, 11, 13].
Understanding and quantifying the relationship between IYCF practices and ARI and diar-
rhoea among infants and young children is crucial to health practitioners and policymakers in
Ethiopia. This information will help in IYCF policy formulation and advocacy, which can, in
turn, play an important role in reducing child morbidity and mortality due to ARI and diar-
rhoea. This assessment is also important in Ethiopia given the current global health efforts–the
United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDG-3.2: ending preventable deaths of new-
borns and under-five children by 2030) [28] and Global Action Plan for Pneumonia and Diar-
rhoea (GAPPD: ending preventable pneumonia and diarrhoea deaths by 2025) [8].
Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the associations between IYCF practices and ARI
and diarrhoea in Ethiopian children.
Methods
Data sources
The study used the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) data for the years 2000
(n = 3680), 2005 (n = 3528), 2011 (n = 4037), and 2016 (n = 3861). The EDHS used the house-
hold questionnaire to collect information on households, and the women’s questionnaire to
collect information on child health and nutrition. The surveys were implemented by the Ethio-
pia Central Statistical Agency (CSA) and Inner City Fund (ICF) International, and funded by
the United States Agency for International Development, and the Government of Ethiopia
[21, 23–25].
The EDHS used a two-stage stratified cluster sampling technique to select households (the
secondary sampling unit) for inclusion in the survey. In stage one, after the nine administrative
units were stratified into 12 urban and 11 rural strata, Enumeration Areas (EAs) were selected
proportional to the household size of the cluster. In stage two, a fixed number of households
were selected from each EA using the list of households as a sampling frame [21, 23–25]. All
women aged 15–49 years who were permanent residents or visitors in the selected households
the night before the survey were included as respondents. The response rates in the surveys
were high, ranging from 94.6% in 2016 to 97.8% in 2000. Our analyses were restricted to living
children who lived with the respondents to minimize recall bias, consistent with past studies
[11, 15]. A total weighted sample of 15,106 women was used, and additional information on
the surveys methodology is provided elsewhere [21, 23–25].
Study setting
Ethiopia is the second most populous country (with more than 110 million population) in
Africa after Nigeria [29]. The population age structure of Ethiopia is predominantly young
populations with 41.6% under the age of 15 years, and women of reproductive age account for
23.4% of the population [30]. The Ethiopian health service structure follows a three-tier sys-
tem: primary-level health care (health posts, health centres, and primary hospitals), secondary-
level health care (General Hospitals) and tertiary-level health care (teaching and specialized
hospitals) [27].
Outcome variables
The outcome variables were ARI and diarrhoea, measured based on maternal recall of symp-
toms of cough and shortness of breath, and diarrhoea, respectively [31]. ARI was defined as
the occurrence of cough accompanied by short and rapid breathing during the two weeks’
period preceding the survey. Diarrhoea was defined as the passage of three or more loose or
liquid stools per day during the two weeks’ period preceding the survey [31, 32].
Exposure variables
The main exposure variables were IYCF indicators (EIBF, EBF, predominant breastfeeding,
the introduction of complementary foods, continued breastfeeding at two years and bottle
feeding) [33]. IYCF indicators were defined as follows:
• EIBF was defined as the proportion of children aged 0–23 months who commenced breast-
feeding within the first hour of birth.
• EBF was defined as the proportion of infants 0–5 months of age who were fed no other food
or drink, not even water, except breast milk (including milk expressed or from a wet nurse),
but allows the infant to receive oral rehydration salt, drops, and syrups (vitamins, minerals
and medicines).
• Predominant breastfeeding was defined as the proportion of infants 0–5 months of age who
received breast milk (including milk expressed or from a wet nurse) as the predominant
source of nourishment, but allows water, water-based drinks, fruit juice, oral rehydration
solution, drops, or syrups of vitamins and medicines during the previous day.
• Introduction of complementary foods (solid, semi-solid or soft foods) was defined as the
proportion of infants 6–8 months of age who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods in the
previous 24 hours, during the day and at night.
• Continued breastfeeding at two years of age was defined as the proportion of children aged
20–23 months who received breast milk during the previous day.
• Bottle feeding was defined as the proportion of children 0–23 months of age who were fed
any liquid (including breast milk) or semi-solid food from a bottle during the previous day.
Potential confounders
The potential confounders were selected based on previously published studies [10, 13, 15, 26,
34, 35] and data availability. Potential confounding factors were broadly classified into socio-
economic, demographic and behavioural, health service and community-level factors.
Socio-economic factors included mothers’ or fathers’ education, maternal employment and
household wealth status. Demographic and behavioural factors included maternal age, family
size, desire for pregnancy, listening to the radio, reading newspaper/magazine and watching
television. Health service factors included ever use of a vaccine, frequency of antenatal care
(ANC) visits, place of birth, and timing of first postnatal care (PNC) visit. Community-level
factors included a place of residence and region of residence.
The study also considered the type of cooking fuel in the analyses of ARI, and the source of
drinking water and type of toilet facility in the analyses of diarrhoea as potential effect measure
modifiers. This was done to investigate whether the association between IYCF practices and
each outcome differed across each stratum for the type of cooking fuel, source of drinking
water and sanitation level. This approach is consistent with previously published studies from
Africa [13, 15, 36–38]. In the current study, households that used electricity, natural gas, bio-
gas, or kerosene as a cooking fuel were classified as ‘improved’, while those households that
used charcoal, firewood, or dung were grouped as ‘not improved’. This classification was
based on previously published studies conducted in LMICs [39–41].
The source of drinking water and type of toilet facility were classified as ‘improved’ or ‘not
improved’, based on the taxonomy of the WHO and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme
(JMP) for Water and Sanitation [42] as applied in past studies [13, 15]. Households that used
piped water, public tap or standpipe, a tube well or borehole, protected well/spring, rainwater
and/or bottled water were classified as ‘improved’. Households that used unprotected well/
spring, tanker truck/cart, surface water, and/or sachet water were grouped as ‘not improved’.
Type of toilet facility was also grouped as ‘improved’ (included flush/pour-flush toilets or
flush/pour-flush toilets piped to the sewer system, septic tank or pit latrine; ventilated
improved pit (VIP) latrine; pit latrine with slab and/or composting toilet). ‘Not improved’ type
of facility included flush/pour-flush not piped to sewer, septic tank or pit latrine; pit latrine
without slab/open pit; bucket or hanging toilet/hanging latrine and no facility/bush/field.
Analytical strategy
The initial analysis involved the tabulation of frequencies and percentages of socioeconomic,
demographic, health-service and community-level factors over the survey years (2000–2016).
Prevalence of ARI and diarrhoea were calculated for each of the exposure variables (i.e., EIBF,
EBF, predominant breastfeeding, the introduction of solid, semi-solid and soft foods, contin-
ued breastfeeding at two years, and bottle feeding). The EDHS data from 2000 to 2016 were
combined to increase the study power and precision of estimates. Before statistical analyses, all
variables were checked for missing properties; nevertheless, there was no evidence of missing-
ness at random.
Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression were used to investi-
gate the associations between IYCF practices and ARI and diarrhoea. Observational studies
(including cross-sectional surveys) are helpful to investigate the association between exposure
and outcome variables [43]. However, in observational studies, unlike randomized controlled
trials (RCTs), exposure selection depends on the participant’s self-selection in which individu-
als with specific characteristics may be exposed than other participants [43, 44]. This non-ran-
domized self-selection in the exposure can confound the measure of association between the
exposures and the outcomes [43, 45]. To minimise the imbalance in participant characteristics
between exposed and unexposed groups, Rosenbum and Rubin [46] proposed the PSM
approach that takes into account the fundamental differences between the two groups. PSM is
a technique to balance the propensity scores of the exposed and unexposed groups so that
direct comparisons of covariates in both groups are meaningful [46]. Propensity scores are
defined as “the conditional probability of being treated or exposed given the covariates” [47].
The key assumption in propensity score analyses is that participants whose propensity scores
are equivalent have comparable covariate distribution [43]. Additional information on the the-
ories and practices of PSM have been published elsewhere [44, 47–49].
In observational studies, researchers have indicated that PSM and multivariable logistic
regression modelling are ‘best’ used in combination when investigating the association
between two variables of interest [47, 50, 51]. For this study, the combined use of PSM and
multivariable logistic regression have the following advantages over ordinary logistic regres-
sion. Firstly, PSM minimizes the potential effect of selection bias due to self-selection of moth-
ers who may have breastfed their babies [52, 53]. Secondly, PSM helps to account for the
systematic differences in background characteristics between infants and young children who
were appropriately fed and those who were inappropriately fed [43, 54]. Thirdly, PSM summa-
rises the background characteristics of all study participants into a single measure and relaxes
the linearity assumption of regression analysis [52]. Finally, PSM methods show the area
where there is no sufficient overlap of covariate distributions between the exposed and
unexposed groups, and where estimates using ordinary logistic regression would have relied
on extrapolation [44, 47].
In the present analyses, a five-staged analytical approach was applied to investigate the asso-
ciation between IYCF practices and ARI and diarrhoea. In stage one, the propensity score was
estimated using binary logistic regression by specifying each IYCF indicator to the outcome
and background characteristics (potential confounders) as predictors. The survey weight was
included as a covariate in the estimation process of the propensity score, consistent with previ-
ously published studies [49, 55]. In stage two, the balance in propensity score was checked
between the exposed and unexposed groups (for each of the IYCF) for sufficient overlap (com-
mon support) by examining the propensity score graphs. In stage three, the balance of covari-
ates across the exposed and unexposed groups was checked by calculating the standardized
mean difference (SMD) for each covariate. Less important potential confounders with SMD of
greater than 10% were excluded from further analyses. In stage four, nearest neighbour 1:1
matching with a caliper (0.1) was applied to create a matched exposed and unexposed groups
with equivalent propensity score. Observations that were not in the common support region
(no sufficient overlap in the graph) were excluded from further analyses (S1 and S2 Figs). In
the final stage, multivariable logistic regression was separately used to estimate the association
between IYCF and ARI and diarrhoea. Adjustment for survey year was also conducted, and
interaction tests between potential effect measure modifiers (type of cooking fuel, type of toilet
system and source of drinking water) and each IYCF indicator were conducted.
Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as the measure of
association between the exposure and outcome variables. We reported the adjusted ORs for
PSM (Table 3) and unadjusted and adjusted ORs for ordinary logistic regression models for
comparison of estimates (S1 Table). Unadjusted ORs for PSM was not reported as potential
confounders are part of the propensity score estimation process in PSM [47]. All analyses were
conducted using ‘svy’ command to adjust for sampling weights, clustering and stratification in
Stata (version 14.0, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). ‘Pscore’ and ‘psmatch2’ were used
for PSM; and the ‘melogit’ function was used for the logistic regression modelling [56].
Results
Characteristics of the study participants
Nearly two-thirds of mothers (71.5%) did not attain any schooling, and more than half
(55.0%) of mothers had no employment. Among the study participants, less than half (48.3%)
of mothers were in 25–34 years’ age group. The majority (95.5%) of mothers resided in house-
holds that used improved cooking fuel. More than half (54.8%) of mothers resided in house-
holds that did not use improved source of drinking water [Table 1].
Table 1. (Continued)
Variables 2000 (N = 3680) 2005 (N = 3528) 2011 (N = 4037) 2016 (N = 3861) 2000–2016 (N = 15,106)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Improved 590 (13.9) 387 (9.7) 523 (12.5) 415 (10.2) 1914 (9.5)
Not improved 3646 (86.1) 3620 (90.3) 3674 (87.5) 3668 (89.8) 14608 (88.4)
Health service factors
Ever received vaccine
No 1448 (45.9) 1343 (52.0) 1245 (42.2) 1121 (42.5) 5157 (45.6)
Yes 1705 (54.1) 1238 (48.0) 1690 (57.6) 1518 (57.5) 6151 (54.4)
Antenatal Visit
None 3122 (74.2) 2845 (71.3) 2369 (56.6) 1412 (34.8) 9748 (59.3)
1–3 visits 691 (16.4) 664 (16.6) 1085 (25.9) 1288 (31.7) 3727 (22.6)
4+ visits 396 (9.4) 479 (12) 735 (17.6) 1362 (33.5) 2972 (18.1)
Mode of delivery
Vaginal birthing 4205 (99.5) 3968 (99) 4115 (98.1) 3978 (97.4) 16266 (98.5)
Caesarean section 23 (0.5) 39 (1.0) 82 (1.9) 105 (2.6) 250 (1.5)
Place of birth
Home 4028 (95.1) 3763 (93.9) 3721 (88.7) 2593 (63.5) 14104 (85.4)
Health facility 208 (4.9) 242 (6.1) 476 (11.4) 1490 (36.5) 2416 (14.6)
Delivery assistance
Health professional 3397 (24.1) 432 (11.4) 491 (12.1) 1521 (43.9) 2829 (18.5)
Traditional birth attendant 3103 (22.0) 522 (13.8) 253 (6.2) 1387 (40.0) 3002 (19.6)
Others untrained 7621 (54.0) 2829 (74.8) 3304 (81.6) 560 (16.1) 9460 (61.9)
Timing of postnatal check-up
None 4006 (94.6) 3786 (94.5) 4065 (96.9) 3776 (92.3) 15632 (94.6)
Within a week 179 (4.2) 176 (4.4) 42 (1.0) 154 (3.8) 551 (3.3)
After a week 50 (1.2) 46 (1.1) 90 (2.1) 153 (3.7) 338 (2.10)
Community-level factors
Place of residence
Urban 405 (9.6) 296 (7.4) 558 (13.3) 492 (12.0) 1750 (10.6)
Rural 3831 (90.4) 3711 (92.6) 3639 (86.7) 3591 (88.0) 14773 (89.4)
Region of residence
Tigray 251 (5.9) 242 (6.1) 261 (6.2) 299 (7.3) 1053 (6.4)
Afar 35 (8.4) 37 (9.2) 37 (8.8) 39 (9.6) 149 (1.0)
Amhara 1092 (25.8) 946 (23.6) 923 (22.0) 751 (18.4) 3712 (22.5)
Oromia 1736 (41.0) 1548 (38.6) 1815 (43.2) 1827 (44.8) 6926 (41.9)
Somali 47 (11.1) 153 (3.8) 120 (2.9) 170 (4.2) 490 (3.0)
Benishangul 43 (1.0) 37 (9.3) 48 (1.1) 43 (1.1) 171 (1.0)
SNNPR� 931 (22.0) 953 (23.8) 867 (20.7) 815 (20.0) 3566 (21.6)
Gambella 10 (2.4) 10 (2.5) 13 (3.2) 10 (2.4) 43 (2.6)
Metropolis 89 (2.1) 80 (2.0) 113 (2.7) 130 (3.2) 413 (2.5)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230978.t001
Infants who commenced breastfeeding within the first hour of birth had a lower prevalence of
ARI (13.9%; 95% CI: 12.7%, 15.1%) compared to those whose mothers delayed initiation of
breastfeeding (17.3%; 95% CI: 15.7%, 18.9%) [Table 2]. The proportion of diarrhoea was lower
among infants aged 0–5 months who were exclusively breastfed (7.7%; 95% CI: 6.3%, 9.4%)
Table 2. Prevalence of acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea by infant and young child feeding in Ethiopia, 2000 to 2016.
IYCF factors Prevalence of ARI Prevalence of diarrhoea
a b % (95% CI) P value b % (95% CI) P value
Early initiation of breastfeeding
No 6517 1125 17.3 (15.7, 18.9) <0.001 1607 24.7 (23.0, 26.4) 0.031
Yes 8589 1387 13.9 (12.7, 15.1) 2245 22.5 (21.1, 23.9)
Exclusive breastfeeding
No 2106 316 15.0 (12.8, 17.5) <0.001 331 15.7 (13.6, 18.1) <0.001
Yes 2447 243 9.9 (8.3, 11.8) 188 7.7 (6.3, 9.4)
Predominant breastfeeding
No 1129 162 14.4 (11.6, 17.7) 0.107 172 15.3 (12.6, 18.4) 0.002
Yes 3424 396 11.6 (10.0, 13.4) 347 10.1 (8.8, 11.7)
Introduction of complementary foods
No 1204 227 18.8 (15.5, 22.6) 0.019 322 26.7 (23.3, 30.4) 0.978
Yes 1133 153 13.5 (10.8, 16.8) 303 26.8 (23.2, 30.7)
Continued breastfeeding at 2 years
No 403 48 11.9 (8.0, 17.4) 0.037 80 20.0 (14.9, 26.3) 0.022
Yes 1717 301 17.5 (15.1, 20.3) 470 27.4 (24.1, 31.0)
Bottle feeding
No 13129 2182 15.0 (14.0, 16.1) 0.217 3425 23.6 (22.4, 24.8) 0.200
Yes 1977 330 16.7 (14.2, 19.5) 427 21.7 (19.0, 24.6)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230978.t002
compared to those who were not exclusively breastfed (15.7%; 95% CI: 13.6%, 18.1%). Infants
aged 0–5 months who were predominantly breastfed had a lower prevalence of diarrhoea
(10.1%; 95% CI: 8.8%, 11.7%) compared to those who were not predominantly breastfed
(15.3%; 95% CI: 13.6%, 18.1%) [Table 2].
Table 3. The association between infant and young child feeding, and acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea in Ethiopia, 2000 to 2016.
IYCF factors Acute respiratory infection Diarrhoea
� �
Adjusted Adjusted
n OR (95% CI) P value n OR (95% CI) P value
Early initiation of breastfeeding
No 4839 1.00 0.001 4832 1.00 0.010
Yes 4839 0.81 (0.72, 0.92) 4832 0.85 (0.75, 0.96)
Exclusive breastfeeding
No 1452 1.00 0.001 1397 1.00 < 0.001
Yes 1452 0.65 (0.51, 0.83) 1397 0.51 (0.39, 0.65)
Predominant breastfeeding
No 1029 1.00 0.159 1053 1.00 0.006
Yes 1029 0.80 (0.59, 1.09) 1053 0.69 (0.53, 0.89)
Introduction of complementary foods
No 736 1.00 0.620 825 1.00 0.453
Yes 736 0.92 (0.66, 1.28) 825 1.08 (0.87, 1.35)
Continued breastfeeding at 2 years
No 341 1.00 0.078 358 1.00 0.009
Yes 341 1.59 (0.95, 2.68) 358 1.57 (1.12, 2.21)
Bottle feeding
No 2059 1.00 0.004 2100 1.00 0.173
Yes 2059 1.36 (1.10, 1.68) 2100 (0.95, 1.28)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230978.t003
for EBF and OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.89 for predominant breastfeeding). Children aged 20–23
months whose mothers continued breastfeeding at two years had a higher odds of experienc-
ing diarrhoea compared to those whose mothers discontinued breastfeeding (OR: 1.57; 95%
CI: 1.12, 2.21) [Table 3]. Similar results were evident in ordinary multivariable logistic regres-
sion models, where EIBF, EBF and predominant breastfeeding were associated with lower
odds of diarrhoea (S1 Table).
In the stratified analysis that considered the modifying effect of the type of toilet and source
of drinking water on diarrhoea, EIBF and EBF were strongly associated with lower risk of diar-
rhoea in households with unimproved type of toilet system and source of drinking water
(Table 5).
Discussion
The present study found that EIBF and EBF were associated with a lower risk for infants and
young children to experience ARI in Ethiopia, while bottle-feeding was associated with a
higher risk of ARI. EIBF, EBF and predominant breastfeeding were associated with a lower
risk of diarrhoea among infants and young children in Ethiopia. Continued breastfeeding at 2
years of age was associated with an increased risk of diarrhoea. The associations between EIBF,
EBF and bottle feeding with ARI were stronger in households with unimproved type of cook-
ing fuel. Similarly, in households with unimproved toilet system and source of drinking water,
EIBF and EBF had stronger associations with diarrhoea.
Since 1990, despite substantial declines in global child mortality, respiratory infections still
remain leading causes of death among children younger than five year of age [57]. Evidence
Table 4. Modifying effect of cooking fuel on acute respiratory infection in Ethiopia, 2000–2016.
IYCF factors Acute respiratory infection P for interaction
Type of cooking fuel
n Improved Not improved
� �
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Early initiation of breastfeeding
No 4839 1.00 1.00 0.940
Yes 4839 0.77 (0.33, 1.79) 0.82 (0.72, 0.93)
Exclusive breastfeeding
No 1452 1.00 1.00 0.274
Yes 1452 1.06 (0.33, 3.37) 0.62 (0.48, 0.80)
Predominant breastfeeding
No 1029 1.00 1.00 0.104
Yes 1029 2.18 (0.66, 7.17) 0.74 (0.53, 1.03)
Introduction of complementary foods
No 736 1.00 1.00 0.361
Yes 736 0.79 (0.05, 13.28) 0.94 (0.67, 1.32)
Continued breastfeeding at 2 years
No 341 1.00 1.00 0.896
Yes 341 1.64 (0.31, 8.69) 1.75 (1.03, 2.96)
Bottle feeding
No 2059 1.00 1.00 0.379
Yes 2059 1.00 (0.46, 2.20) 1.44 (1.16, 1.78)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230978.t004
suggests that the increased risk of ARI in children depends on a range of factors, including
sub-optimal breastfeeding, malnutrition, household environment (such as crowding and air
pollution), poor vaccine coverage and antibiotic misuse [57–60]. Consistent with the literature,
our findings showed that children who commenced breastfeeding within the first hour of birth
and were exclusively breastfed had a reduced risk of experiencing ARI compared to their coun-
terparts. The biological mechanism for the protective effect of optimal breastfeeding against
ARI may be due to the presence of immunological substances (such as oligosaccharides,
immunoglobulins, hormones, and enzymes) in breastmilk [61, 62]. These immunological sub-
stances provide passive immunity to the infant, as well as assist in the maturation of the infant
immune system [61, 62]. Also, improved childhood nutrition status from optimal breastfeed-
ing can partially explain the protective effect of breastfeeding against ARI [58, 61].
Evidence has shown that optimal breastfeeding is associated with reduced childhood mor-
bidity and mortality attributable to diarrhoeal diseases [12, 63]. Consistent with past studies [8,
11, 13, 15, 59], this study found that EIBF and EBF were associated with a lower risk of diar-
rhoea. Optimal breastfeeding can reduce the incidence of diarrhoea via three mechanisms.
Firstly, breastfeeding eliminates the infant’s exposure to contaminated foods and fluids. Sec-
ondly, breastmilk provides the infant with anti-microbial and immunological substances that
stimulate the gastrointestinal tract of the infant to develop passive immunity against pathogens
[61, 62]. Finally, breastfeeding improves the nutritional status of the infant which can, in turn,
lower the risk of childhood diarrhoea [58, 61].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230978.t005
Previous studies conducted in Vietnam [64], Nepal [65], and Brazil [66] have suggested that
predominant breastfeeding, which is the provision of non-milk fluids (such as water, tea, and
juices) in addition to breastmilk to infants, can increase the risk of childhood diarrhoea. How-
ever, the present study found that predominant breastfeeding was associated with a lower odds
of infants to experience diarrhoea in Ethiopia. Our finding was consistent with studies con-
ducted in sub-Saharan African [11, 13, 15] and South Asian countries [39, 40], which showed
that predominant breastfeeding was associated with a lower risk of diarrhoea in children.
Despite the variations in the literature on the health effect of predominant breastfeeding, some
authors have argued that promoting both EBF and predominant breastfeeding may be benefi-
cial to the infant as some studies found lower risk of ARI and diarrhoea among predominantly
breastfed infants [11, 13]. In many African countries, the provision of water and non-milk flu-
ids to infants is a common socio-cultural practice [67–69] (often promoted by the mothers-in-
law and/or grandmothers) [70, 71] as mothers reported that providing water to infants imme-
diately after breastfeeding helps to quench thirst or stop hiccups [69]. However, the provision
of water can be a source of infection for infants and young children in those environments. In
a low income country like Ethiopia, where access to potable water is limited and sanitation is
poor [72], advocating for predominant breastfeeding alongside EBF may predispose infants
and young children to experience diarrhoea.
Based on the immunological, nutritional, hygienic, economic and psychological advantages
of breastfeeding to the infant, the mother and the community [14], the WHO/UNICEF recom-
mends that mothers should continue breastfeeding until the child is two years of age and
beyond [33]. Our study suggested that children who continued breastfeeding at two years of
age had higher odds of experiencing diarrhoea compared to those who had discontinued
breastfeeding at two years of age. This finding was supported by studies conducted in LMICs
that showed the positive relationship between continued breastfeeding and childhood diar-
rhoea [10, 13, 15]. While it is important to introduce complementary foods to infants at
around six months of age, those complementary foods can be contaminated due to unhygienic
preparation, unsafe storage, insufficient cooking time and use of unhygienic feeding utensils
[73, 74]. The concurrent provision of potentially contaminated complementary foods and
breastmilk to children around the age of 2 years could be a possible reason for the observed
association between continued breastfeeding at two years and diarrhoea
Previous research has indicated that breastfed infants have fewer infections and hospitaliza-
tions rate compared to bottle-fed infants [15, 75]. The current study showed that children aged
0–23 months who were bottle-fed had a higher risk of experiencing ARI compared to their
counterparts. Past studies have shown that infants who were bottle-fed had lower opportuni-
ties for receiving antibodies and other immune complexes from their mothers [61, 62]. It is
also possible that the relationship between bottle feeding and ARI is evident because bottle
feeding may promote a higher rate of swallowing and more frequent interruption of breathing,
which may increase the risk for micro-aspiration, and can lead to chest infection [76, 77].
implementing BFHI at the health facility level would play a crucial role in improving IYCF
and reduce the disease burden attributable to ARI and diarrhoea in Ethiopia.
In 2008, the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia launched the National Nutrition
Strategy (NNS) to improve child health outcomes, including IYCF [91]. Although significant
improvements in child nutritional status, morbidity and mortality have been observed in Ethi-
opia [21, 22], additional policy interventions are still required. Hence, in 2015, the Govern-
ment of Ethiopia introduced the Health Sector Transformation Plan [27], with the aim to
increase a range of health outcomes for Ethiopians, including IYCF practices. Although this
initiative is needed and well-deserved, there is a need for Ethiopian health stakeholders to
strengthen the BFHI in order to improve IYCF behaviours. This measure is crucial to improve
IYCF and subsequently reduce ARI and diarrhoea burden in Ethiopia because a recent assess-
ment of IYCF scored BFHI service zero out of ten points in the country [90]. Also, future stud-
ies that evaluate the success, challenges and opportunities of the Ethiopian Health Sector
Transformation Plan within the context of the impact on IYCF may be needed to guide refine-
ment of future programs.
Conclusion
EIBF and EBF were protective against ARI and diarrhoea, while bottle-feeding was associated
with a higher odds of ARI in Ethiopian children. Infants who were predominantly breastfed
had a lower odds of experiencing diarrhoea. Our study suggests that community- and facility-
based interventions that targets improved IYCF practices should be prioritised and scaled-up
to reduce the burden of ARI and diarrhoea among Ethiopian children.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Distribution of propensity scores before and after nearest neighbour (0.1) match-
ing in ARI and IYCF indicator.
(DOCX)
S2 Fig. Distribution of propensity scores before and after nearest neighbour (0.1) match-
ing in diarrhoea and IYCF indicator.
(DOCX)
S1 Table. The association between infant and young child feeding, and acute respiratory
infection and diarrhoea in Ethiopia, 2000 to 2016.
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Measure DHS, ICF International, Rockville, MD, USA, for provid-
ing the data for analysis. KYA and FAO acknowledge the support of Global Maternal and
Child Health Research Collaboration in the proofreading of the original manuscript.
GloMACH members are Kingsley E. Agho, Felix Akpojene Ogbo, Thierno Diallo, Osita E
Ezeh, Osuagwu L Uchechukwu, Pramesh R. Ghimire, Blessing Jaka Akombi, Pascal Ogeleka,
Tanvir Abir, Abukari I. Issaka, Kedir Yimam Ahmed, Abdon Gregory Rwabilimbo, Daarwin
Subramanee, Nilu Nagdev and Mansi Dhami
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Kedir Y. Ahmed, Felix Akpojene Ogbo.
Data curation: Kedir Y. Ahmed.
Formal analysis: Kedir Y. Ahmed.
Investigation: Kedir Y. Ahmed, Felix Akpojene Ogbo.
Methodology: Kedir Y. Ahmed, Andrew Page, Amit Arora, Felix Akpojene Ogbo.
Software: Kedir Y. Ahmed, Felix Akpojene Ogbo.
Supervision: Andrew Page, Amit Arora, Felix Akpojene Ogbo.
Validation: Kedir Y. Ahmed, Andrew Page, Felix Akpojene Ogbo.
Visualization: Kedir Y. Ahmed, Andrew Page, Amit Arora, Felix Akpojene Ogbo.
Writing – original draft: Kedir Y. Ahmed.
Writing – review & editing: Kedir Y. Ahmed, Andrew Page, Amit Arora, Felix Akpojene
Ogbo.
References
1. GBD 2016 Lower Respiratory Infections Collaborators. Estimates of the global, regional, and national
morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory infections in 195 countries, 1990–2016: a sys-
tematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018; 18(11):1191–
210. Epub 2018/09/24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30310-4 PMID: 30243584; PubMed
Central PMCID: PMC6202443.
2. GBD Diarrhoeal Diseases Collaborators. Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality,
and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study
2015. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017; 17(9):909–48. Epub 2017/06/06. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099
(17)30276-1 PMID: 28579426; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5589208.
3. Gupta GR. Tackling pneumonia and diarrhoea: the deadliest diseases for the world’s poorest children.
Lancet. 2012; 379(9832):2123–4. Epub 2012/06/12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60907-6
PMID: 22682449.
4. Walker CLF, Rudan I, Liu L, Nair H, Theodoratou E, Bhutta ZA, et al. Global burden of childhood pneu-
monia and diarrhoea. Lancet. 2013; 381(9875):1405–16. Epub 2013/04/16. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60222-6 PMID: 23582727.
5. Edmond K, Scott S, Korczak V, Ward C, Sanderson C, Theodoratou E, et al. Long Term Sequelae from
Childhood Pneumonia; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e31239. https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031239 PMID: 22384005
6. Wazny K, Zipursky A, Black R, Curtis V, Duggan C, Guerrant R, et al. Setting research priorities to
reduce mortality and morbidity of childhood diarrhoeal disease in the next 15 years. PLoS Med. 2013;
10(5):e1001446-e. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001446 PMID: 23690756.
7. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5
mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development
Goals. The Lancet. 2016; 388(10063):3027–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8
PMID: 27839855
8. WHO, UNICEF. Ending preventable child deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea by 2025: The inte-
grated global action plan for pneumonia and diarrhoea (GAPPD). Geneva, Switzerland2013.
9. Bbaale E. Determinants of diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection among under-fives in Uganda. Aus-
tralas Med J. 2011; 4(7):400–9. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2011.723 PMID: 23393526.
10. Hajeebhoy N, Nguyen PH, Mannava P, Nguyen TT, Mai LT. Suboptimal breastfeeding practices are
associated with infant illness in Vietnam. Int Breastfeed J. 2014; 9:12–. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-
4358-9-12 PMID: 25097662.
11. Ogbo FA, Nguyen H, Naz S, Agho KE, Page A. The association between infant and young child feeding
practices and diarrhoea in Tanzanian children. Trop Med Health. 2018; 46:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s41182-018-0084-y PMID: 29422772
12. Ogbo FA, Okoro A, Olusanya BO, Olusanya J, Ifegwu IK, Awosemo AO, et al. Diarrhoea deaths and
disability-adjusted life years attributable to suboptimal breastfeeding practices in Nigeria: findings from
the global burden of disease study 2016. Int Breastfeed J. 2019; 14:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-
019-0198-9 PMID: 30647767
13. Ogbo FA, Agho K, Ogeleka P, Woolfenden S, Page A, Eastwood J. Infant feeding practices and diar-
rhoea in sub-Saharan African countries with high diarrhoea mortality. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2):
e0171792. Epub 2017/02/14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171792 PMID: 28192518; PubMed
Central PMCID: PMC5305225.
14. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st cen-
tury: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016; 387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-
6736(15)01024-7
15. Ogbo FA, Page A, Idoko J, Claudio F, Agho KE. Diarrhoea and suboptimal feeding practices in Nigeria:
Evidence from the national household surveys. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016; 30(4):346–55. Epub
2016/03/25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12293 PMID: 27009844.
16. Nguyen P, Binns CW, Ha AVV, Chu TK, Nguyen LC, Duong DV, et al. Prelacteal and early formula feed-
ing increase risk of infant hospitalisation: a prospective cohort study. 2020; 105(2):122–6. https://doi.
org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316937 %J Archives of Disease in Childhood. PMID: 31523040
17. Labiner-Wolfe J, Fein SB, Shealy KR. Infant formula-handling education and safety. Pediatrics. 2008;
122 Suppl 2:S85–90. Epub 2008/10/10. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1315k PMID: 18829836.
18. Boone KM, Geraghty SR, Keim SA. Feeding at the Breast and Expressed Milk Feeding: Associations
with Otitis Media and Diarrhea in Infants. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2016; 174:118–25. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.006 PMID: 27174145
19. WHO. Capture the moment—Early initiation of breastfeeding: the best start for every newborn. New
York, USA: WHO; 2018.
20. The World Bank. The world bank in Ethiopia 2019. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/
country/ethiopia/overview.
21. Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro. Ethiopian demographic and health survey
2000. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: CSA and ORC Macro; 2001.
22. Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia mini demographic and health sur-
vey 2019: Key indicators. Rockville, Maryland, USA2019. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/
pubs/pdf/PR120/PR120.pdf.
23. Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro. Ethiopia demographic and health survey
2005. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: CSA and ORC Macro; 2006.
24. Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF International. Ethiopia demographic and health sur-
vey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF
International; 2012.
25. Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF International. Ethiopia demographic and health sur-
vey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Rockville, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency (CSA) and
ICF International; 2016.
26. Ahmed KY, Page A, Arora A, Ogbo FA. Trends and determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding and
exclusive breastfeeding in Ethiopia from 2000 to 2016. Int Breastfeed J. 2019; 14(1):40. https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13006-019-0234-9 PMID: 31528197
27. Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health. Health sector transformation plan: 2015/16–2019/20 (2008–2012
EFY). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health; 2015.
28. SDG-UN. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York, USA: UN;
2015. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%
20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf.
29. Total Population by Country 2019 2019 [cited 2019 May 01]. Available from: http://
worldpopulationreview.com/countries/.
30. Demographic dividened. Ethiopia 2016. Available from: http://demographicdividend.org/country_
highlights/ethiopia/.
31. Croft, Trevor N, Aileen MJM, Courtney KA, et al. Guide to DHS Statistics: DHS-7. Rockville, Maryland,
USA2018.
32. WHO. Diarrhoeal disease 2017 [17/11/2019]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-
sheets/detail/diarrhoeal-disease.
33. WHO UNICEF. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices Part 1 Definitions.
2008.
34. Ahmed KY, Page A, Arora A, Ogbo FA. Trends and factors associated with complementary feeding
practices in Ethiopia from 2005 to 2016. Matern Child Nutr. 2019:e12926. Epub 2019/12/14. https://doi.
org/10.1111/mcn.12926 PMID: 31833239.
35. Amsalu ET, Akalu TY, Gelaye KA. Spatial distribution and determinants of acute respiratory infection
among under-five children in Ethiopia: Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey 2016. PLoS One. 2019;
14(4):e0215572. Epub 2019/04/23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215572 PMID: 31009506;
PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6476529.
36. Admasie A, Kumie A, Worku A. Children under Five from Houses of Unclean Fuel Sources and Poorly
Ventilated Houses Have Higher Odds of Suffering from Acute Respiratory Infection in Wolaita-Sodo,
Southern Ethiopia: A Case-Control Study. J Environ Public Health. 2018; 2018:9320603. Epub 2018/
05/11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9320603 PMID: 29743893; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMC5878865.
37. Khan MSB, Lohano HDJES, Research P. Household air pollution from cooking fuel and respiratory
health risks for children in Pakistan. 2018; 25(25):24778–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2513-
1 PMID: 29926328
38. Ezeh OK, Agho KE, Dibley MJ, Hall J, Page AN. The Impact of Water and Sanitation on Childhood Mor-
tality in Nigeria: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys, 2003–2013. 2014; 11(9):9256–72.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110909256 PMID: 25198687
39. Naz S, Page A, Agho KE. Household air pollution from use of cooking fuel and under-five mortality: The
role of breastfeeding status and kitchen location in Pakistan. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173256-e.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173256 PMID: 28278260.
40. Naz S, Page A, Agho KE. Household Air Pollution and Under-Five Mortality in Bangladesh (2004–
2011). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(10):12847–62. https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijerph121012847 PMID: 26501296.
41. Ezeh OK, Agho KE, Dibley MJ, Hall JJ, Page AN. The effect of solid fuel use on childhood mortality in
Nigeria: evidence from the 2013 cross-sectional household survey. Environmental Health. 2014; 13
(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-113 PMID: 25514998
42. UNICEF, WHO. Progress on sanitation and drinking water– 2015 update and MDG assessment.
Geneva, Switzerland2015.
43. Morgan CJJJoNC. Reducing bias using propensity score matching. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018; 25(2):404–6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1012-y PMID: 28776312
44. Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, Roza K, Meier DE, Morrison RS, et al. Methods for constructing and
assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014; 49(5):1701–20. Epub 2014/05/02. https://doi.org/
10.1111/1475-6773.12182 PMID: 24779867; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4213057.
45. Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score
when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158
(3):280–7. Epub 2003/07/29. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg115 PMID: 12882951.
46. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for
Causal Effects. Biometrika. 1983; 70(1):41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
47. Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical science: a
review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics. 2010; 25(1):1–21. Epub 2010/09/28. https://
doi.org/10.1214/09-sts313 PMID: 20871802; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2943670.
48. Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in
Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011; 46(3):399–424. Epub 2011/06/08. https://doi.org/
10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 PMID: 21818162.
49. Dugoff EH, Schuler M, Stuart EA. Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score
methods to complex surveys. Health Serv Res. 2014; 49(1):284–303. Epub 2013/07/16. https://doi.org/
10.1111/1475-6773.12090 PMID: 23855598.
50. Abadie A, Imbens GW. Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment
Effects. 2006; 74(1):235–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x
51. Rubin DB, Thomas N. Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognos-
tic Covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2000; 95(450):573–85. https://doi.org/
10.2307/2669400
52. Jiang M, Foster EM. Duration of Breastfeeding and Childhood Obesity: A Generalized Propensity Score
Approach. 2013; 48(2pt1):628–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01456.x PMID: 22924637
53. Grube MM, von der Lippe E, Schlaud M, Brettschneider A-K. Does breastfeeding help to reduce the risk
of childhood overweight and obesity? A propensity score analysis of data from the KiGGS study. PLoS
One. 2015; 10(3):e0122534-e. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122534 PMID: 25811831.
54. Chen Q, Nian H, Zhu Y, Talbot HK, Griffin MR, Harrell FE Jr. Too many covariates and too few cases?
—a comparative study. Stat Med. 2016; 35(25):4546–58. Epub 2016/07/01. https://doi.org/10.1002/
sim.7021 PMID: 27357163; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5050102.
55. Austin PC, Jembere N, Chiu M. Propensity score matching and complex surveys. Stat Methods Med
Res. 2018; 27(4):1240–57. Epub 2016/07/26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216658920 PMID:
27460539.
56. StataCorp. Stata survey data reference manual release 15. College Station, Texas A Stata Press Pub-
lication StataCorp LLC; 2017.
57. Troeger CE, Khalil IA, Blacker BF, Biehl MH, Albertson SB, Zimsen SRM, et al. Quantifying risks and
interventions that have affected the burden of lower respiratory infections among children younger than
5 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30410-4
58. Bernardo L. Horta, Victora CG. Short-term effects of breastfeeding: A systematic review on the benefits
of breastfeeding on diarrhoea and pneumonia mortality. Geneva, Switzerland2013.
59. Lamberti LM, Fischer Walker CL, Noiman A, Victora C, Black RE. Breastfeeding and the risk for diar-
rhea morbidity and mortality. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S15–S. https://doi.org/10.
1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S15 PMID: 21501432.
60. Smith KR, Samet JM, Romieu I, Bruce N. Indoor air pollution in developing countries and acute lower
respiratory infections in children. Thorax. 2000; 55(6):518–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.55.6.518
PMID: 10817802.
61. Palmeira P, Carneiro-Sampaio M. Immunology of breast milk. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira
(1992). 2016; 62(6):584–93. Epub 2016/11/17. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.62.06.584 PMID:
27849237.
62. Hosea Blewett HJ, Cicalo MC, Holland CD, Field CJ. The immunological components of human milk.
Adv Food Nutr Res. 2008; 54:45–80. Epub 2008/02/23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(07)00002-
2 PMID: 18291304.
63. Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, Lim SS, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national
comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks
or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global
Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018; 392(10159):1923–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(18)32225-6 PMID: 30496105
64. Hajeebhoy N, Rigsby A, McColl A, Sanghvi T, Abrha TH, Godana A, et al. Change strategies to protect,
promote, and support infant and young child feeding. Food Nutr Bull. 2013; 34(3 Suppl):S181–94. Epub
2013/11/23. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265130343s205 PMID: 24261076.
65. Acharya D, Singh JK, Adhikari M, Gautam S, Pandey P, Dayal V. Association of water handling and
child feeding practice with childhood diarrhoea in rural community of Southern Nepal. Journal of infec-
tion and public health. 2018; 11(1):69–74. Epub 2017/06/04. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.04.007
PMID: 28576344.
66. Santos FS, Santos LHd, Saldan PC, Santos FCS, Leite AM, Mello DFd. BREASTFEEDING AND
ACUTE DIARRHEA AMONG CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE FAMILY HEALTH STRATEGY %J
Texto & Contexto—Enfermagem. 2016; 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.002
67. Davies-Adetugbo AA. Sociocultural factors and the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding in rural Yoruba
communities of Osun State, Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 45(1):113–25. Epub 1997/07/01. https://doi.
org/10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00320-6 PMID: 9203276.
68. Agunbiade OM, Ogunleye OV. Constraints to exclusive breastfeeding practice among breastfeeding
mothers in Southwest Nigeria: implications for scaling up. Int Breastfeed J. 2012; 7(1):5. https://doi.org/
10.1186/1746-4358-7-5 PMID: 22524566
69. Tsegaye M, Ajema D, Shiferaw S, Yirgu R. Level of exclusive breastfeeding practice in remote and pas-
toralist community, Aysaita woreda, Afar, Ethiopia. Int Breastfeed J. 2019; 14(1):6. https://doi.org/10.
1186/s13006-019-0200-6 PMID: 30719068
70. Negin J, Coffman J, Vizintin P, Raynes-Greenow C. The influence of grandmothers on breastfeeding
rates: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2016; 16(1):91. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12884-016-0880-5 PMID: 27121708
71. Bezner Kerr R, Dakishoni L, Shumba L, Msachi R, Chirwa M. "We grandmothers know plenty": breast-
feeding, complementary feeding and the multifaceted role of grandmothers in Malawi. Soc Sci Med.
2008; 66(5):1095–105. Epub 2007/12/25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.019 PMID:
18155334.
72. UNICEF-Ethiopia. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia2018. Available from:
https://www.unicef.org/ethiopia/water-sanitation-and-hygiene-wash.
73. Om Prasad Gautam Joanna EstevesMills, Chitty Alexandra, Curtis Val. Complementary Food Hygiene:
An overlooked opportunityin the WASH, nutrition and health sectors. London, UK: London School of
Hygien and Tropical Medicine; 2015. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/
57a0898ce5274a27b2000127/Policy_Brief__Complementary_Food_Hygiene_Jan_2015.pdf.
74. Kaferstein FK. Food safety: the fourth pillar in the strategy to prevent infant diarrhoea / F. K. Käferstein.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization: the International Journal of Public Health 2003; 81(11): 842–
843. 2003.
75. Stuebe A. The risks of not breastfeeding for mothers and infants. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 2(4):222–
31. PMID: 20111658.
76. Goldfield EC, Richardson MJ, Lee KG, Margetts S. Coordination of sucking, swallowing, and breathing
and oxygen saturation during early infant breast-feeding and bottle-feeding. Pediatr Res. 2006; 60
(4):450–5. Epub 2006/08/31. https://doi.org/10.1203/01.pdr.0000238378.24238.9d PMID: 16940236.
77. Kim H-Y, Han Y, Pyun Y, Kim J, Ahn K, Lee S-I. Prolonged bedtime bottle feeding and respiratory symp-
toms in infants. Asia Pac Allergy. 2011; 1(1):30–5. Epub 2011/04/26. https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.
2011.1.1.30 PMID: 22053294.
78. Ogbo FA, Eastwood J, Page A, Efe-Aluta O, Anago-Amanze C, Kadiri EA, et al. The impact of sociode-
mographic and health-service factors on breast-feeding in sub-Saharan African countries with high diar-
rhoea mortality. Public Health Nutr. 2017; 20(17):3109–19. Epub 2017/10/06. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S1368980017002567 PMID: 28980521.
79. Sinha B, Chowdhury R, Sankar MJ, Martines J, Taneja S, Mazumder S, et al. Interventions to improve
breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015; 104(S467):114–
34. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13127 PMID: 26183031
80. WHO. Community-based strategies for breastfeeding promotion and support in developing countries.
Geneva, Switzerland2003. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42859/
9241591218.pdf;jsessionid=9C0B865E2E62BB2C26AE8CD5B088A4DC?sequence=1.
81. Minas AG, Ganga-Limando M. Social-Cognitive Predictors of Exclusive Breastfeeding among Primipa-
rous Mothers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164128. https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0164128 PMID: 27723797
82. Negin J, Coffman J, Vizintin P, Raynes-Greenow C. The influence of grandmothers on breastfeeding
rates: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2016; 16:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-
016-0880-5 PMID: 27121708
83. Mannion CA, Hobbs AJ, McDonald SW, Tough SC. Maternal perceptions of partner support during
breastfeeding. Int Breastfeed J. 2013; 8(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-8-4 PMID: 23651688
84. Ogbo FA, Akombi BJ, Ahmed KY, Rwabilimbo AG, Ogbo AO, Uwaibi NE, et al. Breastfeeding in the
Community—How Can Partners/Fathers Help? A Systematic Review. 2020; 17(2):413. https://doi.org/
10.3390/ijerph17020413 PMID: 31936302
85. Ogbo FA, Eastwood J, Page A, Arora A, McKenzie A, Jalaludin B, et al. Prevalence and determinants
of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in the early postnatal period in Sydney, Australia. Int Breastfeed