CAP Debates Packet 2021 - Frederick A-F, Evan Wilson
CAP Debates Packet 2021 - Frederick A-F, Evan Wilson
CAP Debates Packet 2021 - Frederick A-F, Evan Wilson
Has burden of proof, therefore goes first and last. Can cast doubt on the arguments or proposition, not
introduce alternative
Must outline the case and introduce new points of Responds by refuting Affirmative, rather than
argument formulating new arguments
STEP 2: Research! - Over Winter Break
Now that you know your topic and the side you will debate, you will need to do some research. Use
the charts below to organize your claims, key quotes, and statistics, and make notes on reasoning
and credibility. You will also want to collect some opposition research, including the opposition’s
claims, so that you are able to build your crossfire and rebuttal. Finally, you will collect a works cited
list of credible sources.
Your Side:
Claim #2 Practical and Convenient for Plastic utensils help save water by limiting dishwasher
customers usage and reduce clean-up after social events which is
helpful for customers.
Claim #3 Alternatives aren’t inherently Paper, a common alternative, takes up more space in
better landfills and is far less durable than current plastic bags,
with little to no benefit in decomposition time. Other
biodegradable options aren’t perfect solutions either.
According to the UN Environment Programme and
studies by the Life Cycle Initiative, the “results indicate
[biodegradable bags] might be the worst option when it
comes to climate impacts” such as acidification and
toxic emissions (Single-use Plastic Bags and their
Alternatives). Reusable bags, while taking up less
space should they end up in landfills, are extremely
energy-inefficient when compared with plastics which
cost little in energy to produce. A study by the Danish
Government and Life Cycle Initiative indicates that bags
made from organic cotton would “need to be reused
7,100 times” to be as efficient as plastic (Life Cycle
Assessment of Grocery Carrier Bags).
Claim #4 Help cut down on disease and Crucial in medical industries, syringes, applicators, drug
virus spread tests, and bandages are all often made to be
disposable.
Works Cited: Add your list of credible sources in here. Make sure to use proper MLA citations.
You will put together a formal team copy of this to turn in on Debate Day!
Adler, Ben. "Banning Plastic Bags Is Great for the World, Right? Not so Fast."
Wired, 10 June 2016, www.wired.com/2016/06/
banning-plastic-bags-great-world-right-not-fast/. Accessed 4 Jan. 2021.
Edgington, Tom. "Plastic or Paper: Which Bag Is Greener?" BBC News, 28 Jan.
2019, www.bbc.com/news/business-47027792. Accessed 4 Jan. 2021.
Freinkel, Susan. “Plastic: Too Good to Throw Away.” The New York Times, The New York Times,
18 Mar. 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/opinion/18freinkel.html?searchResultPosition=3.
Harrabin, Roger. “Plastic Packaging Ban 'Could Harm Environment'.” BBC News, BBC, 9 Jan. 2020,
www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51040155.
King, Sarah, and Angela Logomasini. "The Big Debate: Should Single-use Plastics
Be Banned?" Toronto Star, 11 Feb. 2020, www.thestar.com/opinion/
contributors/thebigdebate/2020/02/11/
the-big-debate-should-single-use-plastics-be-banned.html. Accessed 4 Jan.
2021.
Minter, Adam. "How a Ban on Plastic Bags Can Go Wrong." Bloomberg, 8 Aug. 2015,
www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2015-08-18/
how-a-ban-on-plastic-bags-can-go-wrong. Accessed 4 Jan. 2021.
Peake, Libby. “Plastic Promises: What the Grocery Sector Is Really Doing about Packaging.” Green
Alliance Plastic Promises: What the Grocery Sector Is Really Doing about Packaging, 9 Jan. 2020,
www.green-alliance.org.uk/plastic_promises.php.
Schwanke, Crystal. "Why We Should Not Ban Plastic Bags." Love to Know,
greenliving.lovetoknow.com/Why_Should_We_Not_Ban_Plastic_Bags. Accessed 4
Jan. 2021.
Constructive Speech (4 minutes): Make sure to include a hook, your introduction, your claims,
and your analysis. Constructive Speeches Introduce New Issues.
● For the PRO (Affirmative) side, this is the only entirely scripted speech, in that it is composed almost
entirely of expert quotations, clearly organized into solid positions. The affirmative team sets forth a
case. A case defends a new policy, called a plan.
● For the CON (Negative) side, this should lay out the choices for how you will attack the affirmative. It
is important to remember that the negative team attacks the affirmative plan, not the topic. For this
reason, the negative side constructive can never be completely scripted.
● Many people confuse compostable plastics as being biodegradable like an apple core. This leads to
just more plastic pollution as that product can only be composted in certain ways.
● Biodegradable plastics are just as toxic as regular plastics
Crossfire #1 (3 minutes):
● Be prepared with questions for your opponents. You will add questions to this section BASED ON
WHAT THEY SAID
● Answer your opponent as succinctly as possible. Don’t evade and try to be honest. Be prepared to
fire back with a question of your own
Brainstorm questions you will ask the opposition here, but leave room to add more as you listen to
the debate:
● Pollution from factories and environmental harm from oil extraction processes are without a
doubt bad, but which alternative to plastic is energy efficient enough that it negates the
drawbacks of gas and factory pollution that can simultaneously deliver the efficiency and
durability of plastic?
● What solution would keep the jobs provided by the plastics industry and prevent any
economic damage in the process?
●
● Many people confuse compostable plastics as being biodegradable like an apple core. This leads to
just more plastic pollution as that product can only be composted in certain ways.
● Plastic remains the most effective material in many circumstances when it comes to storing foods-
for example, cucumbers wrapped in plastic last 14 days longer, reducing food waste.” BBC
● A study conducted by The University of Columbia found Bioplastics contribute more to ozone
depletion than traditional plastics. (University of Columbia)
● The University also found that “B-PET, the hybrid plastic, was found to have the highest potential for
toxic effects on ecosystems contains the most carcinogens, and scored the worst in the life cycle
analysis because it combined the negative impacts of both agriculture and chemical processing.”
● When being decomposed Bioplastics can release methane, which for those of you who don’t know,
is a greenhouse gas 23 times more potent than Co2, therefore, contributing even more to climate
change than regular plastics derived from petroleum which don’t release this gas.
●
Crossfire #2 (3 minutes):
● Be prepared with questions for your opponents. You will add questions to this section BASED ON
WHAT THEY SAID
● Answer your opponent as succinctly as possible. Don’t evade and try to be honest. Be prepared to
fire back with a question of your own
Brainstorm questions you will ask the opposition here, but leave room to add more as you listen to
the debate:
● What are the alternatives to regular plastics if biodegradable plastics are just as toxic and
bad for the environment?
You said that Paper bag is reusable but they are far less reusable than plastic
You also said that glass is not found in oceans but one can find it scattered all of the
beaches and ocean floors. Unlike plastic glass sinks which is why we can see it in the
water.
Glass contributes much more to climate change when it comes
● How do you feel about causing thousands and potentially millions of people to lose their
jobs?
● Alternatives such as glass contribute more to climate change because they are far heavier
therefore contributing more Co2 when being transported.
●
TAKE NOTES
Summary Speech (2 minutes): Summarize the main points in the debate and your side’s main
arguments.
Grand Crossfire (3 minutes): Brainstorm questions that you will ask the opposition to drive home
the rightness of your argument and wrongness of their argument.
Final Focus Speech (2 minutes): Tell the judge why your side won the debate. For this part, you
will speak directly to the judge.
Add some ideas in here prior to the debate, but you will likely need to draft this section as you
listen to the debate.
Mr. Mayo, My partner, and I won this debate without a question. Our opponent’s arguments may
have contained some valid points, but we hope you feel differently about switching to non-plastic
solutions after hearing what we had to say about the economic and environmental effects of the
alternative solutions. I would like to end by saying
● The only reason single-use plastics are having such a great effect on the environment is
that people are being irresponsible when it comes to disposing of or reusing these helpful
tools. If everyone disposed of their waste in the correct ways while reusing what they
already have the negative effects of plastics could be mitigated. In time, less
environmentally-impactful means of production and better disposal methods will eventually
prevent this from being an issue at all. In the end, single-use plastics are not the problem,
it's the people.
Thank you
STEP 4: Debate Team Check-in! - January 6 (@ assigned time)
On Wednesday, January 6, you will check-in with your debate teacher during your assigned check-in time.
Prior to this time, make sure to check in with your debate partner via email, text, zoom, etc to get organized
and discuss your goals for the day. During your meeting with your debate teacher, be prepared to run through
major arguments with the teacher grading you. You should have final speeches and lines of reasoning to
show them, even if there is a part of it that you are unsure of.
● 9:00am Meet in our Interdisciplinary Zoom to get instructions for the day