CONTEMPORARY MUSIC IN PIANO PEDAGOGY

Antonietta Loffredo

In this brief look at contemporary piano music repertoire I shall try and answer
the following questions: a) Is it possible to introduce the language and performance
of contemporary music from the very first years of study? b) What educational
purpose does this serve? c) What repertoire do we have available?
I will first illustrate some examples of possible repertoire. Subsequently, given
some prerequisites of an educational nature, I will examine some elements taken
from an analysis of the pieces, highlighting their possible implications in a teaching
environment, with the objective of demonstrating the pedagogical value of a
repertoire which is still little adopted in the curriculum in the first years of study.

Examples

Example 1. Jatekok, G. Kurtág (1979). Editio Musica Budapest

Figure 1: incipit of Hommage à Tchaikovsky, in Jatekok: Vol. 1

1
 Figure 2: incipit of Perpetuum Mobile, in Jatekok: Vol. 1

Jatekok is a Hungarian word translated as "Games" in English. Kurtág (1979)

says that “The idea of composing Games was suggested by children playing
spontaneously, children for whom the piano is still a toy. [...] It is a possibility for
experimenting and not for learning to play the piano” (p. 9). Here clusters (Figure 1)
and glissandi (Figure 2) are used to explore the instrument both physically and
acoustically. The primary feature is gesture, as an expression of energy contained
within a self-sufficient formal microcosm (Loffredo, 2008).

Example 2. Five Easy Piano Pieces, B. Lorentzen (1971). Wilhelm Hansen Edition

Figure 3: incipit of no.1 Waves, in Five Easy Piano Pieces

The Five Easy Piano Pieces by Bent Lorentzen, commissioned by the NMPU (Nordic
Music Pedagogical Union) of Aarhus in 1971, “can be considered as minimalist,
since they use small and precise repetition modules where the composer indicates
the exact duration in seconds for each; rhythmic variants are applied mainly
through the addition or removal of notes and pauses” (Loffredo, 2008, p.18).

Example 3. Ein Kinderspiel, H. Lachenmann (1980). Breitkopf & Härtel Edition

2
 Figure 4: incipit of no. 5 Filter Swing, in Ein Kinderspiel

Figure 5: incipit of no. 7 Shadow Dance, in Ein Kinderspiel

These seven pieces are written so that young pianists can play them, but the
typical qualities of Lachenmann’s “concrete instrumental music” (Von der Weid,
2002, 314) are present just as much as in his other works. For example, in Filter
Swing (Figure 4) a single chord is repeated over and over again. What matters is the
different ways in which it can be made to resound, also through a refined use of the
pedal. Shadow Dance (Figure 5) is totally based on the rhythmic element and just
two notes, which eventually fade away to play with rhythm using merely the sound
produced by the pedal (Loffredo, 2008).

Example 4. Mirada, M. Zavala (1991). Pygmalión Edition

3
 Figure 6: 6 Minus 431 in Mirada

Mirada is a collection of nine short pieces written for teaching purposes. This
work was inspired directly by the composer’s piano teaching experience, each piece
being dedicated to a pupil with whom the composer worked. For example, she
dedicates 6 Minus 431 (Figure 6) to a pupil who never respected and understood the
value of silence. That is why there are a large number of coronas, each one
representing a longer pause.

Example 5. Alabaster of Lights, S. Procaccioli (2009)

4
 Figure 7: no. 1 Gray Lights March, in Alabaster of Lights

Alabaster of Lights is six panels written for teaching purposes but with the
specific aim of avoiding compromises of a linguistic nature. The author’s idea is
that “in order to overcome the main obstacle of contemporary music, the linguistic
aspect, it is important that pupils deal with the real language and not a simplified
copy” (Procaccioli, 2003, p.1). So the formal articulation, use of resonance, kind of
materials and treatment typical of his main works are introduced in this piece using
short forms, simplified technique and titles with synaesthetic suggestions. Heavily
involved in writing for children, Procaccioli (2009) has written another version for
piano duet, to make this work even easier from a technical point of view.

Example 6. Etchings IV. Nine Easy Landscapes, P. Longo (2006)

5
 Figure 8: no. 6 34/100, in Etchings IV

At the basis of the construction there is the same kind of process adopted in all
the author’s works: a minimal cell, here consisting of five notes taken from the title
and a basic rhythmic cell, both subjected to a cycle of permutation. This procedure
is simply made more approachable from a technical point of view.

Introductory pedagogical and analytical comments

In order to consider the examples used it is now necessary to make some

introductory comments of a pedagogical nature:

6
a) Traditional music notation is a symbolic system based on segmentation. This
segmentation exists neither on a perceptual level nor in terms of motor skills.
Musical performance is indeed always the result of gestural units (Bartolini,
2002).

b) One of the main expressive aspects of music consists in the affinity between
rhythmic-melodic patterns and behavioural gesture patterns. Indeed, basic
emotional states are generally connected with specific rhythms, movements and
directions (Renard, 1982).

c) The new trend in pedagogy does not promote a linear approach to knowledge
(linear: from simple to complex through a hierarchical logical classification of
elements) but rather a holistic approach, in which complex does not mean
difficult. In this context, intelligibility must be sought not in the fragmentation of
elements, but in their reciprocal interaction within a system (Bartolini, 2002).

I add one of my own analytical considerations, in order to explain what I will

later cite as synthetic thinking. An analysis of these pieces would seem to show a
tendency by composers to place the attention on resonant objects, on brief
rhythmic and melodic patterns and on the possibilities for varying these or relating
them to one another, rather than on developing or expanding them.

From the motoric point of view, the result is a single gesture with its possible
variations or the possible interaction of conversing gestural units. This is made even
clearer, for example, by the macro-gesture or the type of notation used in the first
two examples given. Avoiding the use of fine motility here allows the pupil to
concentrate on other aspects regarding playing an instrument, or rather on making
music. This takes us back to the introductory comments: fragmentation prevents
the natural expressive tension provided by the unitary nature of the gesture
(Bartolini, 2002).

Furthermore, in the pieces given (which are clearly only examples of the
repertoire, sufficiently representative although not exhaustive), the attention is
often focused on timbre, intensity and rhythm. All these aspects are very physical
elements and closely linked to behavioural gesture patterns, to recall Renard's
(1982) previously cited comments.

Implications for teaching

So at the root of this repertoire there would appear to be synthetic thinking,

which is expressed through essential rhetoric, close linked to gestural aspects. I
believe that this link may be useful in many ways, if applied within the context of
teaching/learning:

7
 in helping pupils to understand musical, logical and analytical aspects in an easy
way;

 in encouraging creative experience: pupils can recognise and use these elements
to compose a new piece or to realise possible variations on it;

 in promoting an expressive experience, as teachers can work on the similarities

between musical gesture and gesture patterns related to emotions and behaviour.

Drawing inspiration from the titles of the pieces, I would like to offer one
further consideration. When we teach we often look for images that can help pupils
to interpret the piece they are learning. This is one possible method, undoubtedly
useful, which belongs to the tradition of music for children. We need only recall
Robert Schumann's Album for the Young. On the other hand, references to extra-
musical elements of a descriptive and/or narrative nature are one of the simplest
ways that a pupil has of giving a meaning to his experience of interpretation.

There are very simple ways of expressing a message, made natural by the nature
of listening, such as for examples, onomatopoeia (primitive but effective), analogy
or structural homology (e.g. structural analogy between music and extra-musical
elements), the mediation of a code according to which a particular culture
attributes certain meanings to certain rhythmic and melodic structures or timbres
etc. (Porena, 1972).

Succeeding in attributing sense in the absence of points of reference (namely

understanding music through its structures), is a more complex way of signification
and which therefore needs to be incentivised by our teaching. Pieces with titles
such as that of Stefano Procaccioli's composition can help to move away from the
need for explicit references, in this specific case (Figure 7) thanks to the
synaesthetic suggestions (grey lights) that immediately take us away from the
denotative context (the march).

Conclusions

In the light of these reflections, I think that the main elements that may help
pupils to simultaneously deal with all aspects of making music with an instrument
in an easy but meaningful manner can be found in this repertoire. This is what I
mean by a “holistic approach” (Bartolini, 2002) to teaching/learning, in which
gestural, expressive, logical, analytical and symbolic aspects give a sense to the
musical experience thanks to their reciprocal interaction.

8
 The examples also show how a contemporary repertoire also exists for the first
years of study for those teachers who think it is important to promote the
knowledge of very different languages and aesthetic contexts in the formative
period. Personally, I believe that this is important, otherwise there is the risk of
denial or simply of inhibiting pupils' interest and curiosity.

It is not a question of introducing this music because it is ‘appreciated’, but of

offering significant means and programmes in a broader context. Music can be
understood and experienced in very different ways and as teachers we have the role
of encouraging this.

References

Bartolini, D. (2002). La frammentazione del senso musicale: L’apprendimento

strumentale tra linearità e complessità. In Freschi, A. M. (Ed.), Insegnare uno
strumento: Riflessioni e proposte metodologiche su linearità /complessità (pp. 43-63).
Torino: E.D.T.
Loffredo, A. (2008). In Giochi e riflessi dal ‘900: l’infanzia in musica [CD liner notes].
(J. Filip, Trans.). Montebelluna: Phoenix Audiosystem.
Michel, I. (2004). L’organizzazione percettiva del tempo musicale. In Deriu, R.
(Ed.), Capire la forma: Idee per una didattica del discorso musicale (pp. 32-52).
Torino: E.D.T.
Paynter, J. (1992). Sound and Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Porena, B. (1988). La musica: Produzione, distribuzione e consumo. Roma: Editori
Riuniti.
Rebaudengo, A. (2000). Musica contemporanea e didattica strumentale. In Adessi
A. R., (Ed.). Le metamorfosi del suono: Idee per la didattica (pp. 56-67). Torino:
E.D.T.
Renard, C. (1982). Il gesto musicale. Milano: Ricordi.
Procaccioli, S. (2003). Osservazioni analitiche. In Quattro Grès per T.: luci, forme e
superfici per pianoforte solo. Unpublished manuscript.
Weid (von der), J.N. (2002). La musica nel XX secolo, Lucca: LIM

Quoted piano works

Kurtág, G. (1979). Játékok: Vol. 1. Budapest: Editio Musica Budapest.

Lachenmann, H. (1980). Ein kinderspiel. Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel KG.
Longo, P. (in press). Etchings IV. Nove paesaggi facili. Lyon: Symétrie

9
Lorentzen, B. (1971). Five easy piano pieces. Copenhagen: Editio Wihelm Hansen.
Procaccioli, S. (2009). Alabastro di luci. Unpublished manuscript.
Procaccioli, S. (2009). Alabastro di luci: piano duet. Unpublished manuscript.
Zavala, M. (1991). Mirada. Madrid: Editoral Pygmalión.

10