Baleros V People

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Doctrine: Overt or external act has been defined as some physical activity or deed,

indicating the intention to commit a particular crime, more than a mere planning
or preparation, which if carried out to its complete termination following its natural
course, without being frustrated by external obstacles nor by the voluntary
desistance of the perpetrator, will logically and necessarily ripen into a concrete
offense.
FACTS: In early morning of December 1991, Renato Baleros went to the
dormitory room of Martina Lourdes T. Albano (Malou), palced himselp on top
of her, and pressed a hankerchief soaked in chloroform. Malou struggled to
free herself in the hands of Baleros and succeeded by grabbing his sexual
organ and squeezing it.
Malou went straight to Marvilou and said “”may pumasok sa kuarto ko
pinagtangkaan ako”.

The morning after, the police said to the tenants of the dormitory to grab the
things that are theirs. The room was left with an unclaimed bag which
Christian, one of the tenants, knew right away that was Renato’s. Among the
contents of the bag was a hankerchief with a volatile substance.

They later found out that Renato was a suitor of Malou which she rejected a
week ago.

RTC found Renato guilty of attempted rape. CA further affirmed the decision.

ISSUE: WON Renato is guilty of attempted rape.


RULING: NO. Under Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code, rape is
committed by a man who has carnal knowledge or intercourse with a woman
under any of the following circumstances: (1) By using force or intimidation;
(2) When the woman is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious; and (3)
When the woman is under twelve years of age or is demented. Under Article
6, in relation to the aforementioned article of the same code, rape is attempted
when the offender commences the commission of rape directly by overt acts
and does not perform all the acts of execution which should produce the crime
of rape by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous
desistance.
There is absolutely no dispute about the absence of sexual intercourse or
carnal knowledge in the present case. The next question that thus comes to
the fore is whether or not the act of the petitioner, i.e., the pressing of a
chemical-soaked cloth while on top of Malou, constitutes an overt act of rape.
ADVERTISEMENT
REPORT THIS AD

Overt or external act has been defined as some physical activity or deed,
indicating the intention to commit a particular crime, more than a mere
planning or preparation, which if carried out to its complete termination
following its natural course, without being frustrated by external obstacles nor
by the voluntary desistance of the perpetrator, will logically and necessarily
ripen into a concrete offense.

It cannot be overemphasized that petitioner was fully clothed and that there
was no attempt on his part to undress Malou, let alone touch her private part.
For what reason petitioner wanted the complainant unconscious, if that was
really his immediate intention, is anybody’s guess.

Assailed decision was REVERSED and SET ASIDE and a new one entered
ACQUITTING petitioner Renato D. Baleros, Jr. of the charge for attempted
rape. Petitioner, however, is adjudged GUILTY of light coercion and is
accordingly sentenced to 30 days of arresto menor and to pay a fine
of P200.00, with the accessory penalties thereof and to pay the costs.

You might also like