Aba Formal Opinion 498
Aba Formal Opinion 498
Aba Formal Opinion 498
Virtual Practice
The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct permit virtual practice, which is technologically
enabled law practice beyond the traditional brick-and-mortar law firm.1 When practicing
virtually, lawyers must particularly consider ethical duties regarding competence, diligence, and
communication, especially when using technology. In compliance with the duty of confidentiality,
lawyers must make reasonable efforts to prevent inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures of
information relating to the representation and take reasonable precautions when transmitting such
information. Additionally, the duty of supervision requires that lawyers make reasonable efforts
to ensure compliance by subordinate lawyers and nonlawyer assistants with the Rules of
Professional Conduct, specifically regarding virtual practice policies.
I. Introduction
As lawyers increasingly use technology to practice virtually, they must remain cognizant
of their ethical responsibilities. While the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct permit
virtual practice, the Rules provide some minimum requirements and some of the Comments
suggest best practices for virtual practice, particularly in the areas of competence, confidentiality,
and supervision. These requirements and best practices are discussed in this opinion, although this
opinion does not address every ethical issue arising in the virtual practice context.2
This opinion defines and addresses virtual practice broadly, as technologically enabled law
practice beyond the traditional brick-and-mortar law firm.3 A lawyer’s virtual practice often occurs
when a lawyer at home or on-the-go is working from a location outside the office, but a lawyer’s
practice may be entirely virtual because there is no requirement in the Model Rules that a lawyer
1
This opinion is based on the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct as amended by the ABA House of
Delegates through August 2020. The laws, court rules, regulations, rules of professional conduct, and opinions
promulgated in individual jurisdictions are controlling.
2
Interstate virtual practice, for instance, also implicates Model Rule of Professional Conduct 5.5: Unauthorized
Practice of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice of Law, which is not addressed by this opinion. See ABA Comm. on
Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 495 (2020), stating that “[l]awyers may remotely practice the law of the
jurisdictions in which they are licensed while physically present in a jurisdiction in which they are not admitted if
the local jurisdiction has not determined that the conduct is the unlicensed or unauthorized practice of law and if
they do not hold themselves out as being licensed to practice in the local jurisdiction, do not advertise or otherwise
hold out as having an office in the local jurisdiction, and do not provide or offer to provide legal services in the local
jurisdiction.”
3
See generally MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT R. 1.0(c), defining a “firm” or “law firm” to be “a
lawyer or lawyers in a partnership, professional corporation, sole proprietorship or other association authorized to
practice law; or lawyers employed in a legal services organization on the legal department of a corporation or other
organization.” Further guidance on what constitutes a firm is provided in Comments [2], [3], and [4] to Rule 1.0.
Formal Opinion 498 ____ _ 2
have a brick-and-mortar office. Virtual practice began years ago but has accelerated recently, both
because of enhanced technology (and enhanced technology usage by both clients and lawyers) and
increased need. Although the ethics rules apply to both traditional and virtual law practice,4 virtual
practice commonly implicates the key ethics rules discussed below.
Model Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4 address lawyers’ core ethical duties of competence,
diligence, and communication with their clients. Comment [8] to Model Rule 1.1 explains, “To
maintain the requisite knowledge and skill [to be competent], a lawyer should keep abreast of
changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant
technology, engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal
education requirements to which the lawyer is subject.” (Emphasis added). Comment [1] to Rule
1.3 makes clear that lawyers must also “pursue a matter on behalf of a client despite opposition,
obstruction or personal inconvenience to the lawyer, and take whatever lawful and ethical
measures are required to vindicate a client’s cause or endeavor.” Whether interacting face-to-face
or through technology, lawyers must “reasonably consult with the client about the means by which
the client’s objectives are to be accomplished; . . . keep the client reasonably informed about the
status of the matter; [and] promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. . . .”5 Thus,
lawyers should have plans in place to ensure responsibilities regarding competence, diligence, and
communication are being fulfilled when practicing virtually.6
2. Confidentiality
Under Rule 1.6 lawyers also have a duty of confidentiality to all clients and therefore “shall
not reveal information relating to the representation of a client” (absent a specific exception,
informed consent, or implied authorization). A necessary corollary of this duty is that lawyers must
at least “make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or
unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client.”7 The following non-
4
For example, if a jurisdiction prohibits substantive communications with certain witnesses during court-related
proceedings, a lawyer may not engage in such communications either face-to-face or virtually (e.g., during a trial or
deposition conducted via videoconferencing). See, e.g., MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 3.4(c) (prohibiting
lawyers from violating court rules and making no exception to the rule for virtual proceedings). Likewise, lying or
stealing is no more appropriate online than it is face-to-face. See, e.g., MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.15;
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 8.4(b)-(c).
5
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.4(a)(2) – (4).
6
Lawyers unexpectedly thrust into practicing virtually must have a business continuation plan to keep clients apprised
of their matters and to keep moving those matters forward competently and diligently. ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l
Responsibility, Formal Op. 482 (2018) (discussing ethical obligations related to disasters). Though virtual practice is
common, if for any reason a lawyer cannot fulfill the lawyer’s duties of competence, diligence, and other ethical duties
to a client, the lawyer must withdraw from the matter. MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.16. During and
following the termination or withdrawal process, the “lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to
protect a client's interests, such as giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other
counsel, surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payment of fee or
expense that has not been earned or incurred.” MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.16(d).
7
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.6(c).
Formal Opinion 498 ____ _ 3
exhaustive list of factors may guide the lawyer’s determination of reasonable efforts to safeguard
confidential information: “the sensitivity of the information, the likelihood of disclosure if
additional safeguards are not employed, the cost of employing additional safeguards, the difficulty
of implementing the safeguards, and the extent to which the safeguards adversely affect the
lawyer’s ability to represent clients (e.g., by making a device or important piece of software
excessively difficult to use).”8 As ABA Formal Op. 477R notes, lawyers must employ a “fact-
based analysis” to these “nonexclusive factors to guide lawyers in making a ‘reasonable efforts’
determination.”
3. Supervision
Lawyers with managerial authority have ethical obligations to establish policies and
procedures to ensure compliance with the ethics rules, and supervisory lawyers have a duty to
make reasonable efforts to ensure that subordinate lawyers and nonlawyer assistants comply with
the applicable Rules of Professional Conduct. 13 Practicing virtually does not change or diminish
this obligation. “A lawyer must give such assistants appropriate instruction and supervision
concerning the ethical aspects of their employment, particularly regarding the obligation not to
disclose information relating to representation of the client, and should be responsible for their
work product.”14 Moreover, a lawyer must “act competently to safeguard information relating to
the representation of a client against unauthorized access by third parties and against inadvertent
8
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.6 cmt. [18].
9
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.6 cmt. [19].
10
Id.
11
The opinion cautions, however, that “a lawyer may be required to take special security precautions to protect
against the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of client information when required by an agreement with the
client or by law, or when the nature of the information requires a higher degree of security.” ABA Comm. on Ethics
& Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 477R (2017).
12
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.6 cmt. [19].
13
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 5.1 & 5.3. See, e.g., ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility,
Formal Op. 467 (2014) (discussing managerial and supervisory obligations in the context of prosecutorial offices).
See also ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 483 n.6 (2018) (describing the organizational
structures of firms as pertaining to supervision).
14
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 5.3 cmt. [2].
Formal Opinion 498 ____ _ 4
or unauthorized disclosure by the lawyer or other persons who are participating in the
representation of the client or who are subject to the lawyer’s supervision.”15 The duty to supervise
nonlawyers extends to those both within and outside of the law firm.16
Guided by the rules highlighted above, lawyers practicing virtually need to assess whether
their technology, other assistance, and work environment are consistent with their ethical
obligations. In light of current technological options, certain available protections and
considerations apply to a wide array of devices and services. As ABA Formal Op. 477R noted, a
“lawyer has a variety of options to safeguard communications including, for example, using secure
internet access methods to communicate, access and store client information (such as through
secure Wi-Fi, the use of a Virtual Private Network, or another secure internet portal), using unique
complex passwords, changed periodically, implementing firewalls and anti-Malware/Anti-
Spyware/Antivirus software on all devices upon which client confidential information is
transmitted or stored, and applying all necessary security patches and updates to operational and
communications software.” Furthermore, “[o]ther available tools include encryption of data that
is physically stored on a device and multi-factor authentication to access firm systems.” To apply
and expand on these protections and considerations, we address some common virtual practice
issues below.
1. Hard/Software Systems
Lawyers should ensure that they have carefully reviewed the terms of service applicable to
their hardware devices and software systems to assess whether confidentiality is protected.17 To
protect confidential information from unauthorized access, lawyers should be diligent in installing
any security-related updates and using strong passwords, antivirus software, and encryption. When
connecting over Wi-Fi, lawyers should ensure that the routers are secure and should consider using
virtual private networks (VPNs). Finally, as technology inevitably evolves, lawyers should
periodically assess whether their existing systems are adequate to protect confidential information.
15
MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.6 cmt. [18] (emphasis added).
16
As noted in Comment [3] to Model Rule 5.3:
When using such services outside the firm, a lawyer must make reasonable efforts to ensure that
the services are provided in a manner that is compatible with the lawyer’s professional
obligations. The extent of this obligation will depend upon the circumstances, including the
education, experience and reputation of the nonlawyer; the nature of the services involved; the
terms of any arrangements concerning the protection of client information; and the legal and
ethical environments of the jurisdictions in which the services will be performed, particularly with
regard to confidentiality. See also Rules 1.1 (competence), 1.2 (allocation of authority), 1.4
(communication with client), 1.6 (confidentiality), 5.4(a) (professional independence of the
lawyer), and 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law).
17
For example, terms and conditions of service may include provisions for data-soaking software systems that
collect, track, and use information. Such systems might purport to own the information, reserve the right to sell or
transfer the information to third parties, or otherwise use the information contrary to lawyers’ duty of
confidentiality.
Formal Opinion 498 ____ _ 5
Lawyers practicing virtually (even on short notice) must have reliable access to client
contact information and client records. If the access to such “files is provided through a cloud
service, the lawyer should (i) choose a reputable company, and (ii) take reasonable steps to ensure
that the confidentiality of client information is preserved, and that the information is readily
accessible to the lawyer.”18 Lawyers must ensure that data is regularly backed up and that secure
access to the backup data is readily available in the event of a data loss. In anticipation of data
being lost or hacked, lawyers should have a data breach policy and a plan to communicate losses
or breaches to the impacted clients.19
Lawyers should review the terms of service (and any updates to those terms) to ensure that
using the virtual meeting or videoconferencing platform is consistent with the lawyer’s ethical
obligations. Access to accounts and meetings should be only through strong passwords, and the
lawyer should explore whether the platform offers higher tiers of security for
businesses/enterprises (over the free or consumer platform variants). Likewise, any recordings or
transcripts should be secured. If the platform will be recording conversations with the client, it is
inadvisable to do so without client consent, but lawyers should consult the professional conduct
rules, ethics opinions, and laws of the applicable jurisdiction.20 Lastly, any client-related meetings
or information should not be overheard or seen by others in the household, office, or other remote
location, or by other third parties who are not assisting with the representation,21 to avoid
jeopardizing the attorney-client privilege and violating the ethical duty of confidentiality.
In addition to the protocols noted above (e.g., reviewing the terms of service and any
updates to those terms), lawyers’ virtual document and data exchange platforms should ensure that
18
ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 482 (2018).
19
See, e.g., ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 483 (2018) (“Even lawyers who, (i) under
Model Rule 1.6(c), make ‘reasonable efforts to prevent the . . . unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to,
information relating to the representation of a client,’ (ii) under Model Rule 1.1, stay abreast of changes in
technology, and (iii) under Model Rules 5.1 and 5.3, properly supervise other lawyers and third-party electronic-
information storage vendors, may suffer a data breach. When they do, they have a duty to notify clients of the data
breach under Model Rule 1.4 in sufficient detail to keep clients ‘reasonably informed’ and with an explanation ‘to
the extent necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.’”).
20
See, e.g., ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 01-422 (2001).
21
Pennsylvania recently highlighted the following best practices for videoconferencing security:
• Do not make meetings public;
• Require a meeting password or use other features that control the admittance of guests;
• Do not share a link to a teleconference on an unrestricted publicly available social media post;
• Provide the meeting link directly to specific people;
• Manage screensharing options. For example, many of these services allow the host to change screensharing
to “Host Only;”
• Ensure users are using the updated version of remote access/meeting applications.
Pennsylvania Bar Ass’n Comm. on Legal Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 2020-300 (2020) (citing an
FBI press release warning of teleconference and online classroom hacking).
Formal Opinion 498 ____ _ 6
documents and data are being appropriately archived for later retrieval and that the service or
platform is and remains secure. For example, if the lawyer is transmitting information over email,
the lawyer should consider whether the information is and needs to be encrypted (both in transit
and in storage).22
Unless the technology is assisting the lawyer’s law practice, the lawyer should disable the
listening capability of devices or services such as smart speakers, virtual assistants, and other
listening-enabled devices while communicating about client matters. Otherwise, the lawyer is
exposing the client’s and other sensitive information to unnecessary and unauthorized third parties
and increasing the risk of hacking.
6. Supervision
The virtually practicing managerial lawyer must adopt and tailor policies and practices to
ensure that all members of the firm and any internal or external assistants operate in accordance
with the lawyer’s ethical obligations of supervision.23 Comment [2] to Model Rule 5.1 notes that
“[s]uch policies and procedures include those designed to detect and resolve conflicts of interest,
identify dates by which actions must be taken in pending matters, account for client funds and
property and ensure that inexperienced lawyers are properly supervised.”
a. Subordinates/Assistants
The lawyer must ensure that law firm tasks are being completed in a timely, competent,
and secure manner.24 This duty requires regular interaction and communication with, for example,
22
See, e.g., ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 477R (2017) (noting that “it is not always
reasonable to rely on the use of unencrypted email”).
23
As ABA Formal Op. 477R noted:
In the context of electronic communications, lawyers must establish policies and procedures, and
periodically train employees, subordinates and others assisting in the delivery of legal services, in
the use of reasonably secure methods of electronic communications with clients. Lawyers also
must instruct and supervise on reasonable measures for access to and storage of those
communications. Once processes are established, supervising lawyers must follow up to ensure
these policies are being implemented and partners and lawyers with comparable managerial
authority must periodically reassess and update these policies. This is no different than the other
obligations for supervision of office practices and procedures to protect client information.
24
The New York County Lawyers Association Ethics Committee recently described some aspects to include in the
firm’s practices and policies:
• Monitoring appropriate use of firm networks for work purposes.
• Tightening off-site work procedures to ensure that the increase in worksites does not similarly increase the
entry points for a data breach.
• Monitoring adherence to firm cybersecurity procedures (e.g., not processing or transmitting work across
insecure networks, and appropriate storage of client data and work product).
• Ensuring that working at home has not significantly increased the likelihood of an inadvertent disclosure
through misdirection of a transmission, possibly because the lawyer or nonlawyer was distracted by a child,
spouse, parent or someone working on repair or maintenance of the home.
Formal Opinion 498 ____ _ 7
associates, legal assistants, and paralegals. Routine communication and other interaction are also
advisable to discern the health and wellness of the lawyer’s team members.25
Similarly, all client-related information, such as files or documents, must not be visible to
others by, for example, implementing a “clean desk” (and “clean screen”) policy to secure
documents and data when not in use. As noted above in the discussion of videoconferencing,
client-related information also should not be visible or audible to others when the lawyer or
nonlawyer is on a videoconference or call. In sum, all law firm employees and lawyers who have
access to client information must receive appropriate oversight and training on the ethical
obligations to maintain the confidentiality of such information, including when working virtually.
Lawyers will understandably want and may need to rely on information technology
professionals, outside support staff (e.g., administrative assistants, paralegals, investigators), and
vendors. The lawyer must ensure that all of these individuals or services comply with the lawyer’s
obligation of confidentiality and other ethical duties. When appropriate, lawyers should consider
use of a confidentiality agreement,27 and should ensure that all client-related information is secure,
indexed, and readily retrievable.
Virtual practice and technology have limits. For example, lawyers practicing virtually must
make sure that trust accounting rules, which vary significantly across states, are followed.28 The
• Ensuring that sufficiently frequent “live” remote sessions occur between supervising attorneys and
supervised attorneys to achieve effective supervision as described in [New York Rule of Professional
Conduct] 5.1(c).
N.Y. County Lawyers Ass’n Comm. on Prof’l Ethics, Formal Op. 754-2020 (2020).
25
See ABA MODEL REGULATORY OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROVISION OF LEGAL SERVICES para. I (2016).
26
For example, a lawyer has an obligation to return the client’s file when the client requests or when the
representation ends. See, e.g., MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.16(d). This important obligation cannot be
fully discharged if important documents and data are located in staff members’ personal computers or houses and
are not indexed or readily retrievable by the lawyer.
27
See, e.g., Mo. Bar Informal Advisory Op. 20070008 & 20050068.
28
See MODEL RULES OF PROF’L CONDUCT R. 1.15; See, e.g., ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility,
Formal Op. 482 (2018) (“Lawyers also must take reasonable steps in the event of a disaster to ensure access to funds
the lawyer is holding in trust. A lawyer’s obligations with respect to these funds will vary depending on the
circumstances. Even before a disaster, all lawyers should consider (i) providing for another trusted signatory on trust
Formal Opinion 498 ____ _ 8
lawyer must still be able, to the extent the circumstances require, to write and deposit checks, make
electronic transfers, and maintain full trust-accounting records while practicing virtually.
Likewise, even in otherwise virtual practices, lawyers still need to make and maintain a plan to
process the paper mail, to docket correspondence and communications, and to direct or redirect
clients, prospective clients, or other important individuals who might attempt to contact the lawyer
at the lawyer’s current or previous brick-and-mortar office. If a lawyer will not be available at a
physical office address, there should be signage (and/or online instructions) that the lawyer is
available by appointment only and/or that the posted address is for mail deliveries only. Finally,
although e-filing systems have lessened this concern, litigators must still be able to file and receive
pleadings and other court documents.
III. Conclusion
The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct permit lawyers to conduct practice
virtually, but those doing so must fully consider and comply with their applicable ethical
responsibilities, including technological competence, diligence, communication, confidentiality,
and supervision.
accounts in the event of the lawyer's unexpected death, incapacity, or prolonged unavailability and (ii) depending on
the circumstances and jurisdiction, designating a successor lawyer to wind up the lawyer's practice.”).