Semiolo y and Architecture: Charles Jencks
Semiolo y and Architecture: Charles Jencks
Semiolo y and Architecture: Charles Jencks
allow us to indulge in the fi ne r distinctions and the more subtle reservations per-
mitted by the traditio n of both-and' ...
Semiolog y and Architecture
Contradictory Levels Continued Over the 1950s and 60s, the study of language and signs was increas-
The Double-Functioning Element ingly applied to areas outside linguistics, most notably by writers such
The 'double-functio ning ' ele me nt and ' both- and' are related , but the re is a dis- as Roland Borthes, Umberto Eco and AJ Greimos. CharlesJencks (b 1939)
tinctio n: the double-functioning ele ment pertains more to the pa rtic ul ars o f use was one of the first writers in English to apply it to architecture (he
and structure, while both- a nd refers more to the relation of the part to the who le. studied English Literature and Architecture at Harvard). As port of a
Both- and e mphasizes double meanings over double-functions ... critique of Modernism, Jencks' use of semiology laid the foundation
for the Post-Modernism of which he was a principal champion.
Accommodation and the Limitations of Order
The Conventional Element Meaning, Inevitable yet Denied
A valid order accommoda tes the c irc umstantial contradictions of a complex reality. T his is perhaps the most funda me ntal idea of semi ology and meaning in arc hitec-
It accommodates as well as imposes. It the reby admits 'control and spontaneity' , ture: the idea that any form in the e nvironment, or sign in la ng uage, is motivated,
'correctness and ease' - improvisation w ithin the who le. It to lerates qualifica- or capable of being motivated. It helps to explain why all of a sudden forms come
tions and compromi se. T here are no fi xed laws in arc hitecture, but not everything ali ve or fall into bits. For it contends that, although a form may be initially arbitrary
w ill work in a building o r a c ity ... or non-motivated as Saussure points out, its subsequent use is motivated or based
on some determinants. Or we can take a slightly different point of view and say that
The Inside and the Outside the minute a new form is invented it will acquire, inevitably, a meaning. 'This
Contrast between the inside and the outside can be a major manifestation of con- semantization is inevitable; as soon as the re is a society, every usage is converted
tradicti on in architecture. However, one of the powerful twentieth century ortho- into a sign o f itself; the use of a raincoat is to give protection from the rai n, but this
doxies has been the necessity for continuity between the m: the inside should be cannot be dissociated fro m the very signs o f an atmospheric situation'. Or, to be
expressed on the outside ... more exact, the use of a raincoat can be dissociated from its shared meanings if we
avoid its social use or explicitly decide to de ny it further meaning.
The Obligation Toward the Difficult Whole ft is this conscious de nial of connotations which has had an interesting history
An architecture of complexity and accommodati on does not forsake the who le. Jn with the avant-garde. Annoyed eithe r by the glib reductio n of their work to its social
fact, I have referred to a special obligatio n toward the who le because the whole is meanings or the contamination of the strange by an o ld language, they have insisted
difficult to achieve. And I have emphas ized the goal of unity rathe r than of sim- o n the intractability of the new and confusing. ' Our League of Nations sy mbo lizes
plification in an art ' whose .. . truth [is] in its totality.' It is the di fficult unity nothing' said the architect Hannes Meyer, all too weary of the creation of buildings
thro ug h inclusion rather tha n the easy unity through exclusion. around past metaphors. 'My poem means nothing; it just is. My painting is mean-
ingless. Against Interpretation: The Literature of Silence. Entirely radical.' Most of
Extracts. Source: Robert Venturi, Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, 2nd edition, these state ments are objecting to the ' inevitable semanti zation' which is trite, whic h
The Museum of Modern Art in association with the Graham Foundation for Advanced is coarse, which is too anthropomorphic and o ld. Some are simply nihilistic and
Studies in the Fine Arts (New York/Chicago), 1977. © The Museum of Modern Art. based on the belief that any meaning which may by applied is spurious; it denies the
A version of this text was first published in Perspecta: The Yale Architectural Journal, funda mental absurdity of human existence. In any case, on one level, all these state-
no 9/10, 1965. ments are paradoxical. In their denial of meaning, they create it. (pp 11 - 12)
+ FORM
ICorl>usier In reality, architecture is too important by now to be le ft to the architects. A real
Archtgram change is necessary, therefore, which will e ncourage new characteristics in the
IAjlto
Stirling prac tice of architecture and new behaviour patterns in its authors: therefore a ll
IUtzon Kahn
Johnson barriers between builders and users must be abolished, so that building and using
I Venluri
Miles
Moretci become two different parts of the same planning process; therefore the intrinsic
Yin Eyck
aggressiveness of arc hitecture and the forced passivity of the user must di ssolve
+ FUNCTION
in a condition of creative a nd decisional equi vale nce where each - with a diffe r-
ent spec ific impact- is the architect, and every architectural event - regardless of
who conceives it a nd carries it out - is considered architecture. The cha nge, in
other words, must coinc ide with the subversion of the present condition, whe re to
be an architect is the result of power delegated in a repressive fashio n and to be
architecture is the result of reference to c lass codes which legitimate o nly the
exception, with an e mphasis proportional to the degree to which it is c ut off from
its context. The expedie nt of ' not reading the surroundings' ( used so well by offi-
c ia l c riti cism by means of the technique of uninhabited cut-outs or even trick
photographs; or by the use of a lin guistic ana lys is whic h excludes a ll judgement
on the use a nd consumptio n of the event under analysis) corresponds, in fact, to
an ideological, political, social, a nd c ultura l fals ification which has no counter-
Stont fuller part in othe r disciplines ... (p2 l 0)
We cannot s it waiting ... (in the cave of arc hitecture-as-it- is waiting for the
socia l paJingenesis to generate automaticall y architecture-as-it-will-be ) but we
must immediately change the who le range of obj ects a nd subjects which partic i-
pate in the architectural process at the present time. There is no other way, besides
thi s one, to recover architecture's historical legitimacy, or, as we have said, its
Charles Jencks, Semantic Space of Architects, 1968 credibility ...
ANY PLANNING INNOVATIONS IN A CITY MUST BE GOVERNED BY THE LOGIC OF Despite and because ofthe rhetoric ofModernist tabula rasa urbanism,
THE WHOLE AND IN DESIGN TERMS MUST OFFER A FORMAL RESPONSE TO RE- historic cities such as Rome continued to exercise a fascination over
EXISTING SPATIAL CONDITIONS. (p89) architects. By the 1960s and 70s, that fascination was helping to f,11
the theoretical vacuum le~ by the all too evident failures of Modern-
Postscript for Architects ist planning. Colin Rowe helped to codify the view, taking Rome as a
(1 ) Architects ... It is more useful to imitate something 'old' but proven, rather paradigm for a new urbanism, both political and physical. Rowe had
than to turn out something new which risks causing people suffering. The logical already thrown Modernism into historical perspective in the 1950s
and attractive building types and spatial structures left to us by anonymous archi- with his essays such as 'The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa'. With
tects have been improved upon by countless succeeding generations. They have Collage City he and Koetter used history as a cure for the ills of
matured into masterpieces even in the absence of a single creator of genius, be- 20th-century urbanism - by way of the essentially 20th-century idea
cause they were based on a perfectly refined awareness of building requirements of collage.
using simple means; the result of an accurate understanding of tradition as the
vehicle for passing on technical and artistic knowledge. (p 167) Collision City and the Politics of 'Bricolage'
Every new urban building must obey the overall structural logic and provide a If we are willing to recognize the methods of science and 'bricolage' as concomi-
formal answer in its design to pre-existing spatial conditions ! (p169) tant propensities, if we are willing to recogni ze that they are - both of them -
Knowledge gained over the course of centuries carries a certain conviction modes of address to problems, if we are willing (and it may be hard) to concede
which we cannot allow to go unnoticed . .. There are almost no further discover- equality between the 'civilized' mind (with its presumptions of logical seriaJity)
ies to be made in architecture . In our century the problems have merely changed and the 'savage' mind (with its analogical leaps), then, in re-establishing 'bricolage'
their dimension. T his is often so dramatic that one cannot warn too emphatically alongside science, it might even be possible to suppose that the way for a truly
against hasty, untested solutions. As long as man needs two arms and two legs, useful future di alectic could be prepared.
the scale of his body must be the measure of size fo r all building. That concerns A truly useful dialectic? The idea is simply the conflict of contending powers,
not only staircases and ceiling he ig ht, but also the design of public space in the the almost fundamental conflict of interest sharply stipulated, the legitimate sus-
urban co ntext. (p62) picion of others' interests, fro m which the democratic process - such as it is -
proceeds; and then the corollary to this idea is no more than banal: if such is the
Extracts. Source: Rob Krier, Urban Space, trans Christine Czechowski and George Black, case, if democracy is compounded of libertarian enthusiasm and legalistic doubt,
A cademy Editions (London), 1979. © A cademy Editions. First published in German as and if it is, inherently, a collisio n of points of view and acceptable as such, then
Stadtraum, 1975. why not allow a theory of contending powers (all of them visible) as likely to
establish a more ideally comprehensive city of the mind than any which has, as
yet, been invented.
And there is no more to it than this. In place of an ideal of universal manage-
ment based upon what are presented as scientific certainties there is also a pri-
vate, and a public, emancipatory interest (which, incidentally, includes emancipation
from management); and, if this is the situatio n and, if the only outcome is to be
We want to state very clearly that Rational Architecture is not concerned with the
revival of the Rationalism of the I 920s. It is, as Massimo Scolari explains, primarily
to do with the revival of Architecture ' tout court'. If its theoretical basis is to be found
in the philosophical Rationalism of the Enlightenment its primary concern should
now lie with the re-creation of the public realm ...
The problem of Rational Architecture can therefore not be one of c horeography. It
cannot find its motivation in a 'state of mind', in the fictions of artistic or technical
progress but in the reflection on the city and its history, on its socia l use and content.
The revolutionary e lement of this new Architecture does not lie in its form but in the
model of its social use, in its coherency, in the reconstruction of the public realm ...
the city, its public spaces and institutional forms, a typology can be understood
that defies a one-to-one reading of function , but which at the same time ensures a
relation at another level to a continuing tradition of city life. The distinguishing
characteristic of the new ontology beyond its specificall y formal aspect is that the
city polis, as opposed to the single column, the hut-house, or the useful machine,
is and always has been political in its essence. The fragmentation and recomposition
of its spatial and institutional forms thereby can neve r be separated from their
received and newly constituted political implications.
When typical forms are selected from the past of a city, they do not come,
however dismembered, deprived of their original political and social meaning.
The original sense of the fo rm, the layers of accrued implication deposited by
time and huma n experience cannot be lightly brushed away and certainly it is not
the intention of the new Rationalists to disinfect their types. Rather, the carried
meanings of these types may be used to provide a key to their newly invested THE UIIIAN BLOCKS AP.ITif£ Af.SULTOF A PATn.R.N OF
STlEl!TS ...,.-o SOUARES. nt£ PAlT'EllN IS TYP'OLOOI-
T1t£ rATIT:_,. OF STRE£TS ANO SOUAR.ES IS THE R.ESULT
OF me ,osmoN Of THI! BLOCKS. THE BLOCKS Altl!
THESTUITS AND SQUAii ES AU PIIECISE FO~AL
TYP£S. llU!S!. P1J8UC AOOMS AR.I! TYl'OLOOICALLY
CAU.Y Cl.ASSIFIABLI!. TYP'OLOOICAUY CLASSIFIABL!. Cl.ASSlF'IABLE.
meanings. The technique or rathe r the fundame ntal compos itional method sug-
gested by the Rationalists is the transformation of selected types - partial or whole
- into entirely new entities that draw their communicative power and potential
criteria from the understanding of this transformation ...
The heroes of this new typology are not among the nostalgic, anti-city utopians
of the ninetee nth century nor even among the cri tics of industrial and technological
progress of the twentieth, but rather among those who, as the professional servants
of urban life, have directed their design skills to solving the questions of avenue, Leon Krier, The Three M0</els to Conceive Urban Spaces, 1972 - the blocks are the result ofa street and sc1uare pattern, the
streets and sc1uares represent the result of the position of the blocks, the streets and squares are precise spatial types
arcade, street and square, park and house, institution a nd equipment in a continuous
typology of e lements that together coheres with past fabric and present interve ntion
to make one comprehensible experience of the city. For this typology, there is no
clear set of rules for the transformations and their objects, nor any pole mically de-
fined set of historical precedents. Nor, perhaps, should there be; the continued vital-
ity of this architectural prac tice rests in its essential engagement with the precise
demands of the present and not in any holistic mythicization of the past. It refuses
any ' nostalgia' in its evocations of history, except to give its restorations sharper