Plesiomorphy and Symplesiomorphy

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that plesiomorphy refers to ancestral character states while apomorphy refers to derived character states. Symplesiomorphy refers to shared ancestral character states. These concepts are important in understanding phylogenetic relationships between taxa.

Plesiomorphy refers to an ancestral character state, while symplesiomorphy refers to a shared ancestral character state. Symplesiomorphies are shared plesiomorphies. Figures 1 and 2 provide examples to illustrate these concepts using imaginary bird species.

Plesiomorphy refers to an ancestral character state inherited from a common ancestor, while apomorphy refers to a derived novel character state. A trait can be a plesiomorphy in one context but an apomorphy in another, depending on the taxa being considered.

Plesiomorphy and symplesiomorphy

Contents
Definition
Discussion
See also
References

Definition
In phylogenetics, a plesiomorphy (“near form”), is a primitive or
ancestral character state and can therefore be called a plesiomorphic
character. A symplesiomorphy ( from syn- “together”) or
[2]
Fig. 1: Phylogenies showing the terminology
symplesiomorphic character[2] is a shared ancestral character (a used to describe different patterns of ancestral
shared plesiomorphy), shared by two or more taxa - but also with and derived character or trait states.[1]
other taxa linked earlier in the clade. The term symplesiomorphy was
first introduced in 1950 by German entomologist Willi Hennig.

fig. 2: Cladogram of imaginary bird species to illustrate plesiomorphy and


symplesiomorphy[3]

A plesiomorphy or a plesiomorphic character can be seen as the opposite of an apomorphy, which is a derived character, an
“evolutionairy novelty”. Both of these terms are by definition relative, because a trait character can be a plesiomorphy in one
context, but an apomorphy in another. Figure 2 shows this more clearly and this will be explained in the next alinea.
Synapormorphy, a shared derived character, is the contrast of a symplesiomorphy (a shared ancestral character).
In figure 2, an imaginary cladogram with 4 living birdspecies is shown. The yellow mask is a derived character for the four living
bird species, and therefore an apomorphy. But the mask is a plesiomophic character in the context of the three masked species,
because for these species it is an ancestral character[3]. A symplesiomorphy is a shared plesiomorphy, so for these yellow tailed
birds the yellow tail is plesiomorphy as an ancestral trait, but this character is shared by all yellow tailed birds, so it is also a
symplesiomorphy.

Another example of a plesiomorphy and symplesiomorphy is in primates. Primates have more recently evolved from mammals.
Hair is an ancestral character (plesiomorphy) for primates. But because hair, a plesiomorphic character, is present in all primates,
it is a symplesiomorphy for them in general as well.[4]

Pseudoplesiomorphy – is a trait that cannot be identified as a plesiomorphy nor as an apomorphy.[5]

Discussion
The concept of plesiomorphy addresses the perils of grouping species together purely on the basis of morphologic or genetic
similarity without distinguishing ancestral from derived character states. Since a plesiomorphic character inherited from a
common ancestor can appear anywhere in a phylogenetic tree, its presence cannot reveal anything about the relationships within
that tree.[6]

Apomorphic characters and synapomorphic characters carry a lot of information about the evolutionary clades and can be used to
define taxa. However the use of only plesiomorphic characters and symplesiomorphic characters can lead to incorrect conclusions
about the evolutionary lines. The question of taxa are closely related to one another should be answered with more evidence[7].
To illustrate this two examples are given:

A famous example is the trait of breathing via gills in bony fish and cartilaginous fish. Bony fish are more closely related to
terrestrial vertebrates, which evolved out of a clade of bony fishes that breathe through their skin or lungs, than they are to sharks,
rays, and other cartilaginous fish.

Their kind of gill respiration is shared by the "fishes" because it was present in their common ancestor and lost in the other living
vertebrates. The shared trait cannot treated as evidence that bony fish are more closely related to sharks and rays than they are to
terrestrial vertebrates.[8]

Another example to show that the symplesiomorphic characters do not mean that the taxa harbouring this character are
necessarily closely related is the one of Reptilia. Reptilia are ectothermic (coldblooded) and birds are endothermic
(warmblooded). This is a plesiomorphic character inherited from a common ancestor for both birds and reptiles. Being
coldblooded is thus a symplesiomorphic character for lizards, turtles an crocodiles. However this symplesiomorphy does not
mean that lizards, turtles and crocodiles form a group that is more closely related and excludes the endothermic birds.[9]

See also
Synapomorphy
Apomorphy
Autapomorphy
Cladistics
References
1. Roderick D.M. Page; Edward C. Holmes (14 July 2009). Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=p2lWhjuK8m8C). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-1336-9.
2. "Phylogenetic Systematics" (https://books.google.com/books?id=JKTeiqPBpM4C&lpg=PA552&pg=PA552).
Encyclopedia of Ecology and Environmental Management. John Wiley & Sons. 2009. p. 552. ISBN 144431324X.
3. Freeman, Scott, 1955-. Evolutionary analysis (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/903941931). Herron, Jon C., 1962-
(5th ed.). Harlow. ISBN 9781292061276. OCLC 903941931 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/903941931).
4. "Plesiomorphy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistr
y/plesiomorphy). www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 2019-09-19.
5. Williams, David; Schmitt, Michael; Wheeler, Quentin (2016). The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The
Legacy of Willi Hennig (https://books.google.com/books?id=J1GJDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA169&lpg=PA169).
Cambridge University Press. p. 169. ISBN 110711764X.
6. Patterson, Colin (1982), "Morphological characters and homology", in Joysey, Kenneth A; Friday, A. E. (eds.),
Problems in Phylogenetic Reconstruction, Systematics Association Special Volume 21, London: Academic Press,
ISBN 0-12-391250-4.
7. Futuyma, Douglas J. (1998), Evolutionary Biology (3rd ed.), Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates,
Inc., p. 95, ISBN 0-87893-189-9
8. Cracraft, Joel; Donoghue, Michael J. (2004), Assembling the Tree of Life, USA: Oxford University Press, p. 367,
ISBN 0-19-517234-5
9. Archibald, J. David,. Aristotle's ladder, Darwin's tree : the evolution of visual metaphors for biological order (http
s://www.worldcat.org/oclc/884645828). New York. ISBN 9780231537667. OCLC 884645828 (https://www.worldca
t.org/oclc/884645828).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plesiomorphy_and_symplesiomorphy&oldid=916819989"

This page was last edited on 20 September 2019, at 20:09 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

You might also like