American Bryological and Lichenological Society
American Bryological and Lichenological Society
American Bryological and Lichenological Society
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
American Bryological and Lichenological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The Bryologist.
http://www.jstor.org
CHICITA F. CULBERSON2
Today thin-layer chromatography is the most general method for surveying the
occurrences of secondary lichen products (Culberson & Kristinsson, 1970). It is suc-
cessfully augmented by mass spectrometry for detecting and identifying many lichen
pigments (Santesson, 1969). For some taxonomic and for many physiologic studies,
however, these methods are not adequate. In most areas of phytochemistry other than
lichenology gas chromatography provides an invaluable means for rapid quantitative
analyses and for easy separations of pure components from mixtures. Coupled to a
mass spectrometer, the gas chromatograph becomes an excellent tool for rapid identifi-
cations as well. In 1965 Shibata and his coworkers (Shibata et al., 1965) described the
analysis of the lichen triterpene zeorin and some of its laboratory derivatives by gas
chromatography of the free substances and of their more volatile trimethylsilyl ethers.
Although the results appeared promising, the method was never pursued for the analysis
of the other naturally-occurring lichen triterpenes. More recently, the biosynthesis of
protolichesterinic acid was studied by gas chromatography (Bloomer et al., 1970a, b).
But these appear to be the only reports on the use of gas chromatography for analysis of
secondary lichen products.
The fact that gas chromatography has found little use in lichen studies is to be
explained by the thermal lability and low volatility of most of the well-known secondary
products of lichens. As a matter of fact, even in other fields where gas chromatography
does play an important role, it is often necessary to convert compounds to more volatile
1 This investigation was supported in part by grant GB-25346 from the National Science
Foundation. Equipment for the construction of the high-speed liquid chromatograph was
purchased through grant GB-27365 from the National Science Foundation. Instrumentation
for gas chromatographywas made available in the Duke University Phytotron through grant
GB-7153 from the National Science Foundation. I thank Dr. C. Lcchmiiller of the Department
of Chemistry, Duke University, and Dr. W. A. Dark of Waters Associates for valuable advice.
2 Department of Botany, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.
derivatives before these can be analyzed. It has been suggested that perhaps as many
as 80% of all existing natural products are not amenable to analysis by gas chroma-
tography. Recently, to meet the need for a good method to analyze compounds of low
volatility or low thermal stability, high-speed liquid chromatography was developed
(Bombaugh et al., 1970; Felton, 1969; Kirkland, 1969). The method has been suc-
cessfully applied to a variety of compounds, and it is certain that this technique will
provide new impetus to the study of secondary natural products that are difficult to
volatilize. The present report describes the first application of this method to the analy-
sis of some typical lichen compounds, with special emphasis on substances for which
gas chromatograms could not be obtained.
I-- WA STE
DETECTOR
COLUMN
GAUGE
VALVE
INJECTOR 't
PORT -
J
-+
R
SRESERVOIR
~> STIRRER
MPUMPZ
?;?;?::?: ?4-
Waters Associates) at costs from $3,000 to over $20,000. The minimum cost to construct a
high-speed liquid chromatographwith a UV detector is about $2,000 without the recorder,
and an inexpensive single-pen recorder could be used with such a single-detector system.
2 4
R=CH3
1
6CH3
RO3 s COOSiMe3 RSiMe
R = SiMe3
OSiMe3
CAP
3 5
QCOOSiMe3
CH-O OSiMe3
CAP R=C3H7
R=C5H11
R-CsHII
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
TIME IN MINUTES
FIGURES 2-5. Gas chromatogramsof trimethylsilyl derivatives of the fatty acid caperatic
acid and of phenolic acid hydrolysis products from depsides. - 2. Broadened peak for the
trimethylsilyl derivative of caperatic acid chromatographedat 190t. - 3. Sharp peak for the
Temperature Retention
Trimethylsilyl Derivative (oC) Time (min.)
Caperatic acid 190 143.0
Caperatic acid 215 34.0
Roccellic acid 190 14.0
Roccellic acid 215 5.0
Unidentified substance from C. subcariosa 190 57.0
215 16.0
Evernic acid A ring 130 31.0
Evernic acid B ring 130 46.5
Barbatic acid A ring 130 46.0
Barbatic acid B ring 130 64.5
Divaricatic acid A ring 150 19.0
Perlatolic acid A ring 150 38.0
6 7 8 Ev
LEC
PER ATR
LEC
I,
T T
.032 As .032 As I As
.004
I•
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 0 2 4
9 10
BAR CR
.016As
I I
.008 As .008 As
Us
ATR
DEM
0 2 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
TIME IN MINUTES
LITERATURE CITED
FIGURES 6-10. High-speed liquid chromatogramsof lichen products and of crude lichen
extracts. - 6. Lecanoric acid ( Lec): A solution (1041) in iso-propyl alcohol chromatographed
with a flow rate of 1.4 ml/min, of hexane-iso-propylalcohol-acetic acid (100:6:1 v/v). - 7.
Perlatolic acid (Per): A solution (841) in iso-propyl alcohol chromatographedwith a flow
rate of 1.4 ml/min. of hexane-iso-propylalcohol-acetic acid (100:6:1 v/v). - 8. The residue
from an acetone extract of Parmelia taylorensis: A solution (541) in chloroform chromatographed
with a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min. of hexane-iso-propyl alcohol-acetic acid (100:6:4 v/v).
Atranorin(Atr), evernic acid (Ev), and lecanoric acid (Lec) are separated. - 9. The residue
from an acetone extract of P. physcioides: A solution in iso-propyl alcohol chroma-
(2.5/l)
tographed with a flow rate of 1.1 ml/min. of hexane-iso-propyl alcohol-acetic acid (100:4:2
v/v). Atranorin (Atr), barbatic acid (Bar), and 4-O-demethylbarbaticacid (Dem) are sepa-
rated. - 10. The residue from an acetone extract of Ramalinapaludosa: A solution (10,1) in
chloroformchromatographedwith a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min. of hexane-iso-propylalcohol-acetic
acid (100:2:3 v/v). Atranorin (Atr), usnic acid (Us), cryptochlorophaeic acid (Cr), and
paludosic acid (Pal) are separated.
CHOBY, E. G., JR. & M. B. NEUWORTH. 1966. Trimethylsilyl derivatives of salacylic acid.
Jour. Org. Chem. 31: 632-634.
CULBERSON, C. F. 1967. The chemical constituents of Ramalina paludosa. THE BRYOLOGIST
70: 397-405.
& H. KRISTINSSON. 1970. A standardized method for the identification of lichen
products. Jour. Chromatogr.46: 85-93.
CULBERSON, W. L. 1969. The chemistry and systematics of some species of the Cladonia
cariosagroup in North America. TiHEBRYOLOGIST 72: 377-386.
FELTON, H. 1969. Performance of components of a high pressure liquid chromatography
system. Jour. Chromatogr.Sci. 7: 13-16.
HUNECK, S., G. FOLLMANN & J. SANTESSON. 1968. 4-O-Desmethylbarbatins~iure, ein neues
Depsid aus Ramalina subdecipiens Stein. Zeitschr. fiir Naturforsch. 23b: 856-860.
KIRKLAND, J. J. 1969. Techniques for high-performanceliquid-liquid and ion exchange chro-
matography with controlled surface porosity column packings. Jour. Chromatogr. Sci. 7:
361-365.
KLEBE, J. F., H. FINKEINER & D. M. WHITE. 1966. Silylations with bis(trimethylsilyl)acet-
amide, a highly reactive silyl donor. Jour. Amer. Chem. Soc. 88: 3390-3395.
SANTESSON,J. 1969. Chemical studies on lichens. 10. Mass spectrometry of lichens. Ark.
fdr Kemi 30: 363-377.
SHIBATA, S., T. FURUYA & H. IIZUKA. 1965. Gas-liquid chromatography of lichen substances.
I. Studies on zeorin. Chem. Pharm.Bull. (Tokyo) 13: 1254-1257.