SNR Maths Specialist 19 Syll
SNR Maths Specialist 19 Syll
SNR Maths Specialist 19 Syll
2
General Senior Syllabus
180843
Contents
1 Course overview __________________________________ 1
1.1 Introduction............................................................................................... 1
1.1.1 Rationale ......................................................................................................... 1
1.1.2 Learning area structure................................................................................... 3
1.1.3 Course structure ............................................................................................. 4
1.2 Teaching and learning .............................................................................. 5
1.2.1 Syllabus objectives ......................................................................................... 5
1.2.2 Underpinning factors....................................................................................... 6
1.2.3 Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives ................. 10
1.2.4 Pedagogical and conceptual frameworks..................................................... 11
1.2.5 Subject matter ............................................................................................... 16
1.3 Assessment — general information ........................................................ 17
1.3.1 Formative assessments — Units 1 and 2..................................................... 17
1.3.2 Summative assessments — Units 3 and 4................................................... 17
1.4 Reporting standards ............................................................................... 18
6 Glossary _______________________________________ 51
7 References _____________________________________ 80
Recommended knowledge
Recommended knowledge refers to the subject matter from the Year 10A Australian Curriculum
that will enhance students’ understanding of this subject’s foundational content.
The following in a non-exhaustive list of recommended knowledge from the Year 10A Australian
Curriculum:
• rational and irrational numbers
• properties of circles
• trigonometry
• sketching functions
• factor and remainder theorem.
Pathways
Specialist Mathematics is a General subject suited to students who are interested in pathways
beyond school that lead to tertiary studies, vocational education or work. A course of study in
Specialist Mathematics can establish a basis for further education and employment in the fields of
science, all branches of mathematics and statistics, computer science, medicine, engineering,
finance and economics.
Senior Secondary
Mathematics
Learning Area
General Applied
• results may contribute to an • no more than one Applied subject
Australian Tertiary Admission Rank can contribute to an ATAR
(ATAR) calculation calculation
• results contribute to the Queensland • results contribute to the QCE
Certificate of Education (QCE)
• includes external assessment
Mathematical Methods
Specialist Mathematics
The students who undertake this subject will continue to develop their numeracy skills at a more
sophisticated level than in P–10. For example, this subject contains topics that will equip students
for the ever-increasing demands of the information age.
These aspects of numeracy knowledge and skills are embedded in the syllabus objectives, unit
objectives and subject matter, and ISMGs for Specialist Mathematics.
1 In an assessment instrument for Mathematics, a ‘problem’ is synonymous with ‘assessment item’ (a question,
task or command that forms part of an assessment technique).
2 Complex unfamiliar questions that require more levels of cognitive skills should not be equated with elaborate
problem-solving tasks and modelling questions only. A single-answer, conventional question, such as: ‘Find the
equation of the line passing through the points (2,1) and (1,3)’ can be adapted to a more open ended question,
such as: ‘Write the equations of at least five lines passing through the point (2,1)’ (Goos 2014). This revised
question targets the identical subject matter but provides the possibility of easily identifying a variety of student
understanding and skills by moving it towards complex unfamiliar and assessing more cognitive skills. For
further examples, see White et al. (2000).
Problem-solving
Problem-solving is required when a task or goal has limiting conditions placed upon it or an
obstacle blocking the path to a solution (Marzano & Kendall 2007). It involves:
• knowledge of the relevant details
• using generalisations and principles to identify, define and interpret the problem
• mental computation and estimation
• critical, creative and lateral thinking
• creating or choosing a strategy
• making decisions
• testing, monitoring and evaluating solutions.
Problem-solving requires students to explain their mathematical thinking and develop strong
conceptual foundations. They must do more than follow set procedures and mimic examples
without understanding. Through problem-solving, students will make connections between
mathematics topics, across the curriculum and with the real world, and see the value and
usefulness of mathematics. Problems may be real-world or abstract, and presented to students
as issues, statements or questions that may require them to use primary or secondary data.
Mathematical modelling
Mathematical modelling begins from an assumption that mathematics is everywhere in the world
around us — a challenge is to identify where it is present, access it and apply it productively.
Models are developed in order to better understand real-world phenomena, to make predictions
and answer questions. A mathematical model depicts a situation by expressing relationships
using mathematical concepts and language. It refers to the set of simplifying assumptions (such
as the relevant variables or the shape of something); the set of assumed relationships between
variables; and the resulting representation (such as a formula) that can be used to generate an
answer (Stacey 2015).
3 A wide variety of frameworks for problem-solving and modelling exist in mathematics education literature. The
approach outlined here aligns with and is informed by other approaches, such as Polya (1957) in How to Solve
It: A new aspect of mathematical method (1957), the Australian Curriculum (ACARA 2015a) Statistical
investigation process, the OECD/PISA Mathematics framework (OECD 2015, 2003) and A framework for
success in implementing mathematical modelling in the secondary classroom (Stillman et al. 2007). For further
reading see Blum et al. (2007); Kaiser et al. (2011); and Stillman et al. (2013).
Once students understand what the problem is asking, they must design a
plan to solve the problem. Students translate the problem into a
mathematically purposeful representation by first determining the applicable
mathematical and/or statistical principles, concepts, techniques and
technology that are required to make progress with the problem.
Appropriate assumptions, variables and observations are identified and
documented, based on the logic of a proposed solution and/or model.
In mathematical modelling, formulating a model involves the process of
mathematisation — moving from the real world to the mathematical world.
Once a possible solution has been achieved, students need to consider the
reasonableness of the solution and/or the utility of the model in terms of the
problem. They evaluate their results and make a judgment about the
solution/s to the problem in relation to the original issue, statement or
question.
This involves exploring the strengths and limitations of the solution and/or
model. Where necessary, this will require going back through the process to
further refine the solution and/or model. In mathematical modelling, students
must check that the output of their model provides a valid solution to the
real-world problem it has been designed to address.
This stage emphasises the importance of methodological rigour and the fact
that problem-solving and mathematical modelling is not usually linear and
involves an iterative process.
Teaching for or
Approach Description
learning through
These approaches are not mutually exclusive. An independent approach (learning through) might
be undertaken as an extension of a dependent or guided activity that students have previously
undertaken (teaching for). Students need to have attained the relevant foundational
understanding and skills before working independently during the problem-solving and modelling
task. This capacity needs to be built over time through the course of study with teachers closely
monitoring student progress.
Formative assessments ● ●
* Subject matter from Units 1 and 2 is assumed knowledge and may be drawn on, as applicable,
in the development of the supervised examination.
Making judgments
Assessment evidence of student performance in each criterion is matched to a performance-level
descriptor, which describes the typical characteristics of student work.
Where a student response has characteristics from more than one performance level, a best-fit
approach is used. Where a performance level has a two-mark range, it must be decided if the
best fit is the higher or lower mark of the range.
Authentication
Schools and teachers must have strategies in place for ensuring that work submitted for internal
summative assessment is the student’s own. Authentication strategies outlined in QCAA
guidelines, which include guidance for drafting, scaffolding and teacher feedback, must be
adhered to.
The student demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the subject matter;
recognises, recalls and uses facts, rules, definitions and procedures; and comprehends and applies
mathematical concepts and techniques to solve problems drawn from Vectors and matrices, Real and
complex numbers, Trigonometry, Statistics and Calculus in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex
unfamiliar situations.
The student explains mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; evaluates the
reasonableness of solutions; communicates using mathematical, statistical and everyday language and
conventions; and makes decisions about the choice of technology, and uses the technology, to solve
problems in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations.
The student demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of the subject matter; recognises,
recalls and uses facts, rules, definitions and procedures; and comprehends and applies mathematical
concepts and techniques to solve problems drawn from Vectors and matrices, Real and complex
numbers, Trigonometry, Statistics and Calculus in simple familiar and complex familiar situations.
The student explains mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; evaluates the
reasonableness of solutions; communicates using mathematical, statistical and everyday language and
conventions; and makes decisions about the choice of technology, and uses the technology, to solve
problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations.
The student demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the subject matter; recognises, recalls and
uses facts, rules, definitions and procedures; and comprehends and applies mathematical concepts and
techniques to solve problems drawn from Vectors and matrices, Real and complex numbers,
Trigonometry, Statistics and Calculus in simple familiar situations.
The student explains mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; evaluates the
reasonableness of solutions; communicates using mathematical, statistical and everyday language and
conventions; and uses technology to solve problems in simple familiar situations.
The student demonstrates partial knowledge and understanding of the subject matter; recognises, recalls
and uses some facts, rules, definitions and procedures; and comprehends and applies aspects of
mathematical concepts and techniques to solve some problems drawn from Vectors and matrices, Real
and complex numbers, Trigonometry, Statistics and Calculus in simple familiar situations.
The student explains some mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; sometimes
evaluates the reasonableness of solutions; communicates using some mathematical, statistical and
everyday language and conventions; and uses technology to solve some problems in simple familiar
situations.
The student demonstrates isolated knowledge and understanding of the subject matter; infrequently
recognises, recalls and uses some facts, rules, definitions and procedures; and infrequently comprehends
and applies aspects of mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from Vectors and matrices, Real
and complex numbers, Trigonometry, Statistics and Calculus in simple familiar situations.
The student infrequently describes aspects of mathematical reasoning relevant to procedures and
decisions; rarely evaluates the reasonableness of solutions; infrequently communicates using some
aspects of mathematical, statistical and everyday language and conventions; and uses aspects of
technology in simple familiar situations.
Unit requirements
Subject matter describes the concepts, ideas, knowledge, understanding and skills that students
are to learn in Unit 1. It is organised into topics and sub-topics. Notional time allocations have
been provided for each sub-topic.
Unit requirements
Subject matter describes the concepts, ideas, knowledge, understanding and skills that students
are to learn in Unit 2. It is organised into topics and sub-topics. Notional time allocations have
been provided for each sub-topic.
Unit requirements
Subject matter describes the concepts, ideas, knowledge, understanding and skills that students
are to learn in Unit 3. It is organised into topics and sub-topics. Notional time allocations have
been provided for each sub-topic.
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn
● ● ●
from all Unit 3 topics
Assessment objectives
This assessment technique is used to determine student achievement in the following objectives:
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from Unit 3 Topics 2
and/or 3
2. comprehend mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from Unit 3 Topics 2 and/or 3
3. communicate using mathematical, statistical and everyday language and conventions
4. evaluate the reasonableness of solutions
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
6. solve problems by applying mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from Unit 3
Topics 2 and/or 3.
Specifications
Description
A problem-solving and modelling task is an assessment instrument developed in response to a
mathematical investigative scenario or context. It requires students to respond with a range of
understanding and skills, such as using mathematical language, appropriate calculations, tables
of data, graphs and diagrams.
Students must provide a response to a specific task or issue that is set in a context that highlights
a real-life application of mathematics. The task requires students to use relevant stimulus material
involving the selected subject matter and must have sufficient scope to allow students to address
all the stages of the problem-solving and modelling approach (see Section 1.2.4). Technology
must be used.
The response is written and must be able to be read and interpreted independently of the
instrument task sheet.
Task examples
Examples of problem-solving and modelling tasks include:
• a report that investigates the applications of matrices in a particular field
• a persuasive report to convince the reader of a preferred model to predict population growth
between Leslie matrices and polynomials
• a magazine article to explain the best squares to buy in Monopoly
• a report showing how matrices can be used to predict the eventual winner for a competition
• an investigative report on eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
Formulate 1, 2 and 5 4
Solve 1 and 6 7
Communicate 3 4
Total 20
Criterion: Formulate
Assessment objectives
1. select, recall and use facts, rules definitions and procedures drawn from Unit 3 Topics 2
and/or 3
2. comprehend mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from Unit 3 Topics 2 and/or 3
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
Criterion: Solve
Assessment objectives
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from Unit 3 Topics 2
and/or 3
6. solve problems by applying mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from Unit 3
Topics 2 and/or 3
Assessment objectives
4. evaluate the reasonableness of solutions
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
• statements about the reasonableness of solutions by considering the context of the task
• statements about relevant strengths and limitations of the solution and/or model 2–3
• statements about decisions made relevant to the context of the task.
Criterion: Communicate
Assessment objective
3. communicate using mathematical, statistical and everyday language and conventions
Assessment objectives
This assessment technique is used to determine student achievement in the following objectives:
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from all Unit 3 topics
2. comprehend mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 3 topics
3. communicate using mathematical and everyday language and conventions
4. evaluate the reasonableness of solutions
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
6. solve problems by applying mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 3
topics
Specifications
Description
The examination will representatively sample subject matter from all Unit 3 topics. Where
relevant, the focus of this assessment should be on subject matter not assessed in the problem-
solving and modelling task.
Subject matter from Units 1 and 2 is considered assumed knowledge.
The examination must ensure that all assessment objectives are assessed. The examination
should be designed using the principles of developing mathematics problems in Section 1.2.4.
The total number of marks used in an examination marking scheme is a school decision.
However, in order to correctly apply the ISMG, the percentage allocation of marks must match the
following specifications.
Complex familiar
Problems of this degree of difficulty require students to demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of the subject matter and application of skills in
a situation where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that
connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains
~ 20% of mathematics; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
- the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
- in a context that has been a focus of prior learning.
Some interpretation, clarification and analysis will be required to develop
responses. These problems can focus on any of the objectives.
Simple familiar
Problems of this degree of difficulty require students to demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of the subject matter and application of skills in
a situation where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements; and
~ 60% • all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
- the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
- is in a context that has been a focus of prior learning.
Students are not required to interpret, clarify and analyse problems to develop
responses. Typically, these problems focus on objectives 1, 2 and 3.
Total 15
Assessment objectives
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from all Unit 3 topics
2. comprehend mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 3 topics
3. communicate using mathematical and everyday language and conventions
4. evaluate the reasonableness of solutions
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
6. solve problems by applying mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 3
topics
• consistently correct selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and
procedures; authoritative and accurate command of mathematical concepts and > 93% 15
techniques; astute evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions and use of
mathematical reasoning to correctly justify procedures and decisions; and fluent
application of mathematical concepts and techniques to solve problems in a
comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar > 87% 14
situations.
• correct selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures;
comprehension and clear communication of mathematical concepts and > 80% 13
techniques; considered evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions and use of
mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and proficient
application of mathematical concepts and techniques to solve problems in simple > 73% 12
familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations.
• thorough selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures;
> 67% 11
comprehension and communication of mathematical concepts and techniques;
evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions and use of mathematical reasoning
to justify procedures and decisions; and application of mathematical concepts and
> 60% 10
techniques to solve problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations.
• selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures; comprehension
> 53% 9
and communication of mathematical concepts and techniques; evaluation of the
reasonableness of some solutions using mathematical reasoning; and application
of mathematical concepts and techniques to solve problems in simple familiar
> 47% 8
situations.
• some selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures; basic > 40% 7
comprehension and communication of mathematical concepts and techniques;
inconsistent evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions using mathematical
reasoning; and inconsistent application of mathematical concepts and techniques. > 33% 6
• infrequent selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures; > 27% 5
basic comprehension and communication of some mathematical concepts and
techniques; some description of the reasonableness of solutions; and infrequent
application of mathematical concepts and techniques. > 20% 4
• isolated selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures; partial > 13% 3
comprehension and communication of rudimentary mathematical concepts and
techniques; superficial description of the reasonableness of solutions; and
disjointed application of mathematical concepts and techniques. > 7% 2
• isolated and inaccurate selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and
procedures; disjointed and unclear communication of mathematical concepts and > 0% 1
techniques; illogical description of the reasonableness of solutions.
Unit requirements
Subject matter describes the concepts, ideas, knowledge, understanding and skills that students
are to learn in Unit 4. It is organised into topics and sub-topics. Notional time allocations have
been provided for each sub-topic.
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from all
● ●
Unit 4 topics
Assessment objectives
This assessment technique is used to determine student achievement in the following objectives:
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from all Unit 4 topics
2. comprehend mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 4 topics
3. communicate using mathematical and everyday language and conventions
4. evaluate the reasonableness of solutions
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
6. solve problems by applying mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 4
topics.
Specifications
Description
The examination will representatively sample subject matter from all Unit 4 topics.
Subject matter from Units 1, 2 and 3 is considered assumed knowledge.
The examination must ensure that all assessment objectives are assessed. The examination
should be designed using the principles of developing mathematics problems in Section 1.2.4.
The total number of marks used in the examination marking scheme is a school decision.
However, in order to correctly apply the ISMG, the percentage allocation of marks must match the
specifications below.
Complex familiar
Problems of this degree of difficulty require students to demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of the subject matter and application of skills in
a situation where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that
connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains
~ 20% of mathematics; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
- the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
- in a context that has been a focus of prior learning.
Some interpretation, clarification and analysis will be required to develop
responses. These problems can focus on any of the objectives.
Simple familiar
Problems of this degree of difficulty require students to demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of the subject matter and application of skills in
a situation where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements; and
~ 60% • all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
- the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
- is in a context that has been a focus of prior learning.
Students are not required to interpret, clarify and analyse problems to develop
responses. Typically, these problems focus on objectives 1, 2 and 3.
Total 15
Assessment objectives
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from all Unit 4 topics
2. comprehend mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 4 topics
3. communicate using mathematical and everyday language and conventions
4. evaluate the reasonableness of solutions
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
6. solve problems by applying mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from all Unit 4
topics.
• consistently correct selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and
procedures; authoritative and accurate command of mathematical concepts and > 93% 15
techniques; astute evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions and use of
mathematical reasoning to correctly justify procedures and decisions; and fluent
application of mathematical concepts and techniques to solve problems in a
comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar > 87% 14
situations.
• correct selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures;
comprehension and clear communication of mathematical concepts and > 80% 13
techniques; considered evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions and use of
mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and proficient
application of mathematical concepts and techniques to solve problems in simple > 73% 12
familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations.
• thorough selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures;
> 67% 11
comprehension and communication of mathematical concepts and techniques;
evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions and use of mathematical reasoning
to justify procedures and decisions; and application of mathematical concepts and
> 60% 10
techniques to solve problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations.
• some selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures; basic > 40% 7
comprehension and communication of mathematical concepts and techniques;
inconsistent evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions using mathematical
reasoning; and inconsistent application of mathematical concepts and techniques. > 33% 6
• infrequent selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures; > 27% 5
basic comprehension and communication of some mathematical concepts and
techniques; some description of the reasonableness of solutions; and infrequent
application of mathematical concepts and techniques. > 20% 4
• isolated selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and procedures; partial > 13% 3
comprehension and communication of rudimentary mathematical concepts and
techniques; superficial description of the reasonableness of solutions; and
disjointed application of mathematical concepts and techniques. > 7% 2
• isolated and inaccurate selection, recall and use of facts, rules, definitions and
procedures; disjointed and unclear communication of mathematical concepts and > 0% 1
techniques; illogical description of the reasonableness of solutions.
Description
This assessment consists of two papers: technology-free (Paper 1) and technology-active
(Paper 2). The examination assesses the application of a range of cognitions to a number of
items drawn from Units 3 and 4. Student responses must be completed individually, under
supervised conditions, and in a set timeframe.
Assessment objectives
This assessment technique is used to determine student achievement in the following objectives:
1. select, recall and use facts, rules, definitions and procedures drawn from Units 3 and 4
2. comprehend mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from Units 3 and 4
3. communicate using mathematical, statistical and everyday language and conventions
4. evaluate the reasonableness of solutions
5. justify procedures and decisions by explaining mathematical reasoning
6. solve problems by applying mathematical concepts and techniques drawn from Units 3
and 4.
Specifications
Description
The external assessment for Specialist Mathematics will representatively sample subject matter
from Units 3 and 4.
The percentage allocation of marks for each paper of the external examination will match the
specifications below.
Complex unfamiliar
Problems of this degree of difficulty require students to demonstrate knowledge
and understanding of the subject matter and application of skills in a situation
where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that
connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains
~ 20% of mathematics; and
• all the information to solve the problem is not immediately identifiable; that is
- the required procedure is not clear from the way the problem is posed, and
- in a context in which students have had limited prior experience.
Students interpret, clarify and analyse problems to develop responses.
Typically, these problems focus on objectives 4, 5 and 6.
Complex familiar
Problems of this degree of difficulty require students to demonstrate knowledge
and understanding of the subject matter and application of skills in a situation
where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that
connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains
~ 20% of mathematics; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable; that is
- the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
- in a context that has been a focus of prior learning.
Some interpretation, clarification and analysis will be required to develop
responses. These problems can focus on any of the objectives.
Addition of matrices
if A and B are matrices with the same dimensions and the entries
of A are 𝑎𝑎𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 and the entries of B are 𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 then the entries of A + B
addition and subtraction of are 𝑎𝑎𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 + 𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
matrices Subtraction of matrices
if A and B are matrices with the same dimensions and the entries
of A are 𝑎𝑎𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 and the entries of B are 𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 then the entries of A – B
are 𝑎𝑎𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
𝑎𝑎1 𝑏𝑏 𝑎𝑎 + 𝑏𝑏1
if 𝒂𝒂 = �𝑎𝑎 � and 𝒃𝒃 = � 1 � then 𝒂𝒂 + 𝒃𝒃 = � 1 �
2 𝑏𝑏2 𝑎𝑎2 + 𝑏𝑏2
in component form if 𝒂𝒂 = 𝑎𝑎1 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝑎𝑎2 𝒋𝒋̂ and 𝒃𝒃 = 𝑏𝑏1 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝑏𝑏2 𝒋𝒋̂ then 𝒂𝒂 + 𝒃𝒃 =
(𝑎𝑎1 + 𝑏𝑏1 )𝒊𝒊̂ + (𝑎𝑎2 + 𝑏𝑏2 )𝒋𝒋̂
Subtraction of vectors
𝒂𝒂 − 𝒃𝒃 = 𝒂𝒂 + (−𝒃𝒃)
the word alternate means other; the chord AB divides the circle
into two segments and AU is tangent to the circle; angle APB ‘lies
in’ the segment on the other side of chord AB from angle BAU; we
say that it is in the alternate segment
alternate segment
basic fundamental
𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛
the expansion (𝑥𝑥 + 𝑦𝑦)𝑛𝑛 = 𝑥𝑥 𝑛𝑛 + � � 𝑥𝑥 𝑛𝑛−1 𝑦𝑦 + ⋯ + � � 𝑥𝑥 𝑛𝑛−𝑟𝑟 𝑦𝑦 𝑟𝑟 +
binomial theorem 1 𝑟𝑟
⋯ + 𝑦𝑦 𝑛𝑛
complex plane
considerable fairly large or great; thought about deliberately and with a purpose
the contrapositive of the statement ‘If P then Q’ is ‘If not Q then not
contrapositive P’; the contrapositive of a true statement is also true (not Q is the
negation of the statement Q)
𝑎𝑎 𝑏𝑏
for a 2 × 2 matrix, if 𝐀𝐀 = � � the determinant of 𝐀𝐀 denoted as
determinant 𝑐𝑐 𝑑𝑑
det 𝐀𝐀 = 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 – 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
1
cos(𝐴𝐴) cos(𝐵𝐵) = (cos (𝐴𝐴 − 𝐵𝐵) + cos (𝐴𝐴 + 𝐵𝐵))
2
1
sin(𝐴𝐴) sin(𝐵𝐵) = (cos (𝐴𝐴 − 𝐵𝐵) − cos (𝐴𝐴 + 𝐵𝐵))
identities for products of sine 2
and cosine ratios 1
sin(𝐴𝐴) cos(𝐵𝐵) = (sin (𝐴𝐴 + 𝐵𝐵) + sin (𝐴𝐴 − 𝐵𝐵))
2
1
cos(𝐴𝐴) sin(𝐵𝐵) = (sin (𝐴𝐴 + 𝐵𝐵) − sin (𝐴𝐴 − 𝐵𝐵))
2
inclusion–exclusion principle
adjective
necessary for the completeness of the whole; essential or
fundamental;
integral noun
in mathematics, the result of integration; an expression from which
a given function, equation, or system of equations is derived by
differentiation
involves:
• formulating a mathematical representation of a problem derived
from within a real-world context
mathematical modelling • using mathematics concepts and techniques to obtain results
• interpreting the results by referring back to the original problem
context
• revising the model (where necessary)
for 2 by 2 matrix
if 𝐀𝐀, 𝐁𝐁 and 𝐂𝐂 are 2 × 2 matrices, 𝐈𝐈 the 2 × 2 (multiplicative) identity
matrix and 𝐎𝐎 the 2 × 2 zero matrix then:
𝐀𝐀 + 𝐁𝐁 = 𝐁𝐁 + 𝐀𝐀 (commutative law for addition)
(𝐀𝐀 + 𝐁𝐁) + 𝐂𝐂 = 𝐀𝐀 + (𝐁𝐁 + 𝐂𝐂) (associative law for addition)
𝐀𝐀 + 𝐎𝐎 = 𝐀𝐀 (additive identity)
matrix algebra
𝐀𝐀 + (−𝐀𝐀) = 𝐎𝐎 (additive inverse)
(𝐀𝐀𝐀𝐀)𝐂𝐂 = 𝐀𝐀(𝐁𝐁𝐁𝐁) (associative law for multiplication)
𝐀𝐀𝐀𝐀 = 𝐀𝐀 = 𝐈𝐈𝐈𝐈 (additive identity)
−𝟏𝟏 −𝟏𝟏
𝐀𝐀 𝐀𝐀 = 𝐀𝐀 𝐀𝐀 = 𝐈𝐈 (multiplicative inverse)
𝐀𝐀(𝐁𝐁 + 𝐂𝐂) = 𝐀𝐀𝐀𝐀 + 𝐀𝐀𝐀𝐀 (left distributive law)
(𝐁𝐁 + 𝐂𝐂)𝐀𝐀 = 𝐁𝐁𝐁𝐁 + 𝐂𝐂𝐂𝐂 (right distributive law)
P
𝑎𝑎1
when 𝒂𝒂 = �𝑎𝑎2 � is the position vector of a point on a straight
𝑎𝑎3
𝑑𝑑1
parametric equation of a straight line in three-dimensional space and 𝒅𝒅 = �𝑑𝑑2 � is any vector
line 𝑑𝑑3
with direction along the line; the line consists of all points
P(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) whose parametric form is given by 𝑥𝑥 = 𝑎𝑎1 + 𝑘𝑘𝑑𝑑1 , 𝑦𝑦 =
𝑎𝑎2 + 𝑘𝑘𝑑𝑑2 , 𝑧𝑧 = 𝑎𝑎3 + 𝑘𝑘𝑑𝑑3 for some real number k.
partial not total or general; existing only in part; attempted, but incomplete
1
sec(𝐴𝐴) = , cos(𝐴𝐴) ≠ 0
cos(𝐴𝐴)
reciprocal trigonometric 1
cosec(𝐴𝐴) = , sin(𝐴𝐴) ≠ 0
functions sin(𝐴𝐴)
cos(𝐴𝐴)
cot(𝐴𝐴) = , sin(𝐴𝐴) ≠ 0
sin(𝐴𝐴)
𝑎𝑎1 𝑏𝑏1
let 𝒂𝒂 = �𝑎𝑎2 � and 𝒃𝒃 = �𝑏𝑏2 � ; 𝒂𝒂 . 𝒃𝒃 = 𝑎𝑎1 𝑏𝑏1 + 𝑎𝑎2 𝑏𝑏2 + 𝑎𝑎3 𝑏𝑏3 is the
𝑎𝑎3 𝑏𝑏3
scalar (dot) product;
when expressed in 𝒊𝒊̂, 𝒋𝒋̂, 𝒌𝒌 � notation, 𝒂𝒂 = 𝑎𝑎1 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝑎𝑎2 𝒋𝒋̂ + 𝑎𝑎3 𝒌𝒌
� and 𝒃𝒃 =
scalar (dot) product � then 𝒂𝒂 . 𝒃𝒃 = 𝑎𝑎1 𝑏𝑏1 + 𝑎𝑎2 𝑏𝑏2 + 𝑎𝑎3 𝑏𝑏3 ;
𝑏𝑏1 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝑏𝑏2 𝒋𝒋̂ + 𝑏𝑏3 𝒌𝒌
the scalar (dot) product has the following geometric
interpretation; 𝒂𝒂 . 𝒃𝒃 = |𝒂𝒂||𝒃𝒃|𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑠 (𝜃𝜃) where 𝜃𝜃 is the angle between
𝒂𝒂 and 𝒃𝒃;
note |𝒂𝒂| = √𝒂𝒂 . 𝒂𝒂
verb
give a pattern, organisation or arrangement to; construct or
arrange according to a plan;
structure noun
in languages, arrangement of words into larger units, e.g. phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs and whole texts, in line with
cultural, intercultural and textual conventions
subtended angle the angle made by a line, arc or object at a given point
adjective
apt or liable to vary or change; changeable; inconsistent; (readily)
susceptible or capable of variation; fluctuating, uncertain;
variable
noun
in mathematics, a symbol, or the quantity it signifies, that may
represent any one of a given set of number and other objects
when expressed in 𝒊𝒊̂, 𝒋𝒋̂, 𝒌𝒌 � notation, 𝒂𝒂 = 𝑎𝑎1 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝑎𝑎2 𝒋𝒋̂ + 𝑎𝑎3 𝒌𝒌
� and
� then 𝒂𝒂 × 𝒃𝒃 = (𝑎𝑎2 𝑏𝑏3 – 𝑎𝑎3 𝑏𝑏2 )𝒊𝒊̂ +
𝒃𝒃 = 𝑏𝑏1 𝒊𝒊̂ + 𝑏𝑏2 𝒋𝒋̂ + 𝑏𝑏3 𝒌𝒌
�;
(𝑎𝑎3 𝑏𝑏1 – 𝑎𝑎1 𝑏𝑏3 )𝒋𝒋̂ + (𝑎𝑎1 𝑏𝑏2 – 𝑎𝑎2 𝑏𝑏1 )𝒌𝒌
vector (cross) product the vector (cross) product has the following geometric
interpretation; let 𝒂𝒂 and 𝒃𝒃 be two non-parallel vectors then
|𝒂𝒂 × 𝒃𝒃| is the area of the parallelogram defined by 𝒂𝒂 and 𝒃𝒃 and
𝒂𝒂 × 𝒃𝒃 is normal to this parallelogram
when 𝒂𝒂 and 𝒃𝒃 are two vectors and 𝜃𝜃 is the angle between them;
the projection of a vector 𝒂𝒂 on a vector 𝒃𝒃 is the vector |𝒂𝒂| cos(𝜃𝜃) 𝒃𝒃�
�
where 𝒃𝒃 is the unit vector in the direction of 𝒃𝒃;
vector projection
�)𝒃𝒃
the projection of a vector 𝒂𝒂 on a vector 𝒃𝒃 is (𝒂𝒂. 𝒃𝒃 � where 𝒃𝒃
� is the
𝒂𝒂.𝒃𝒃
unit vector in the direction of b; this projection is also given by 𝒃𝒃
𝒃𝒃.𝒃𝒃
1.1 July 2018 Minor editorial amendments to assumed knowledge, prior learning
and experience
Glossary updates