Social Media Marketing in Luxury Brands: A Systematic Literature Review and Implications For Management Research
Social Media Marketing in Luxury Brands: A Systematic Literature Review and Implications For Management Research
Social Media Marketing in Luxury Brands: A Systematic Literature Review and Implications For Management Research
www.emeraldinsight.com/2040-8269.htm
Social media
Social media marketing in marketing in
luxury brands luxury brands
Abstract
Purpose – Digital technologies and social media have improved the connectivity and collaboration between
firms and customers in all sectors. However, in the luxury sector, the approach to social media and digital
technologies has been slower than in other industries. The purpose of this paper is to review the academic
literature on social media marketing in luxury brands to highlight the current state of the art, the addressed
key research themes and the implications for management research and practice.
Design/methodology/approach – A systematic literature review of academic research on social media
marketing has been conducted to gather, examine and synthetize studies related to luxury brands. By
following a review protocol based on both automatic and manual search on the Scopus database, all relevant
studies on luxury brands were identified and analyzed.
Findings – A critical conceptualization of social media marketing in luxury brands has been provided and
the emerging key research themes have been categorized into four main areas.
Originality/value – Academic literature about social media marketing activities in luxury firms is very
limited and existing studies focus only on certain aspects, contexts or single cases. In contrast, the value of
this study, for both academics and practitioners, lies in providing, for the first time, a comprehensive and
critical systematization of social media marketing academic literature in the field of luxury brands.
Keywords Systematic review, Co-creation, Competitive advantage, Social media marketing,
Digital luxury, Luxury brand
Paper type Literature review
1. Introduction
The advent of social media and digital technologies has changed the competitive landscape
for firms that quickly acknowledged the increasing relevance of social media platforms for
business purposes (Kaplan and Haenlein, 2010, 2011; Safko, 2010; Bruhn et al., 2012; Levy,
2013; Wang and Kim, 2017; Keegan and Rowley, 2017). Social media has been defined as “a
group of internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological
foundations of Web 2.0 and that allow the creation and exchange of user-generated content”
(Kaplan and Haenlein, 2010, p. 61). Several forms of social media exist such as social
networking sites (SNSs), microblogs, content communities, virtual worlds and in all of these
different ways, customers and firms share information, insights and experiences.
Several benefits arise in participating on social media for businesses. For example,
building brand reputation (Ngai et al., 2015), developing collaborative products (Mangold Management Research Review
and Faulds, 2009) and marketing strategies for brand management (Laroche et al., 2013). Vol. 41 No. 6, 2018
pp. 657-679
Social media has surely offered companies new business opportunities but also important © Emerald Publishing Limited
2040-8269
dilemmas and challenges (Coulter, 2012; Del Giudice et al., 2013) by providing consumers DOI 10.1108/MRR-04-2017-0134
MRR with much more control, information and power over the marketing process. Customers can
41,6 generate information and share opinions about a firm’s products and services with a bigger
scope and wider influence than was the case previously (Sashi, 2012). The new competitive
landscape, where customers and brands are increasingly embedded in social media such as
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube, is fierce and firms are in a situation in which
they co-own their brands and co-define their symbolic meanings with customers (Tynan
658 et al., 2010; Nieto and Santamaría, 2007).
Social media and, in general, the digital domain pose an enormous challenge for luxury
firms by questioning the traditional business model. In fact, even though the diffusion and
adoption of social media in most industries has been relatively rapid, luxury firms have long
been hesitant (Okonkwo, 2010; Kapferer and Bastien, 2012; Chevalier and Gutsatz, 2012).
Only in recent years, the luxury sector has approached social media to meet the increasing
pervasiveness of social networks and communities in customers’ lives (Arrigo, 2014b).
Luxury brand lifecycles have become shorter and the growing relevance in the luxury
market of young customers who use social media has forced traditional luxury firms to
develop innovative strategies to stay relevant in this dynamic and volatile market (Ko et al.,
2016). Luxury firms need to develop a clear understanding of what social media could do for
them, and define a clear strategy to improve customers’ experience and perceptions of their
brands on social media (Phan et al., 2011).
However, academic research examining the role of social media in luxury firms has
received little attention and remains largely unexplored. To date, there has been no effort to
review systematically and synthesize existing studies on the marketing potential of social
media for luxury brands. Often, the few existing studies on this topic are focused on a
particular aspect of social media activities (Kim and Ko, 2010; Hughes et al., 2016; Godey
et al., 2016), a specific context of analysis (Stokinger and Ozuem, 2014, 2016) or single
company cases (Phan et al., 2011; Ng, 2014). Thus, a research gap emerges on the state of the
art in the domain of social media marketing studies addressed at luxury brands.
The present research aims to fill this gap by providing a systematic literature review
(Webster and Watson, 2002; Kitchenham et al., 2009) of social media marketing studies in
the field of luxury brands to highlight the addressed key research themes and suggest
further research developments. The contribution of this study is, therefore, to offer, for the
first time, a comprehensive understanding and overview of social media marketing in
luxury brands, and to map those research themes already addressed for academics wanting
to develop new research studies in this domain.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides the background
on social media marketing and the evolution of luxury brands’ presence in the digital
domain; Section 3 describes the research methodology used to realize this systematic
literature review; Section 4 contains the synthesis of data extraction; Section 5 provides the
results and discussion on the highlighted research themes. Finally, Section 6 draws
conclusions, managerial and theoretical implications for management research with possible
future research directions and limitations.
2. Theoretical background
2.1 Social media marketing
Social media refers to the concept of Web 2.0 that involves the collection of open-source,
interactive and user controlled online applications that can help users to share their
experiences as participants in business and social processes. Web 2.0 applications support
the creation of informal users’ networks and the diffusion of user-generated content that
facilitate the flow of information and knowledge (Constantinides and Fountain, 2008; Social media
Carayannis, 2010). marketing in
In the managerial academic literature, social media has been recognized as an important
channel to reach the market for business purposes (Mangold and Faulds, 2009; Kaplan and
luxury brands
Haenlein, 2010; Bruhn et al., 2012; Sashi, 2012; Risius and Beck, 2015; Lamberton and
Stephen, 2016). Social media allows firms to achieve many goals that go beyond simply
having a direct relationship with customers. For example, these include recognition of new
business opportunities, delivery of commercial and institutional content, collection of 659
customer feedback and the creation of communities (Michaelidou et al., 2011; Berthon et al.,
2012).
The huge amount of social media data such as customers’ personal data, available
market offers and customers’ opinions represent a valuable source of information to drive
marketing decisions (Hoffman and Fodor, 2010; Coulter, 2012). By monitoring social media
sites, firms can obtain a multifaceted vision of the market and a clear understanding of
current or potential inside issues (Arrigo, 2014a, 2016).
Social media can play a useful role in developing strong market knowledge (Bharati et al.,
2015) as the information and data required to deal with competitive challenges have been
quickly relocated from published and proprietary sources to open social platforms. Through
a continuous scanning process of social media, data collection on customers’ lifestyles, needs
and problems encountered with existing products can take place at any moment (Chua and
Banerjee, 2013; Stone and Woodcock, 2014). Additionally, social media analytics has proven
to provide practical solutions to support management decisions (Risius and Beck, 2015).
With this aim in mind, Peters et al. (2013) have recently proposed a framework for managing
social media by designing a social media metrics system appropriate for individual firms
through the construction of a sensitive social media dashboard.
Social media represents for businesses also an efficient channel to display commercial
and institutional communications to the extent that it is even considered a hybrid element of
the promotion mix. In fact, it connects aspects of the traditional marketing communication
mix to a “highly magnified form of word-of-mouth” among customers where firms cannot
manage either the content or the frequency of this communication (Mangold and Faulds,
2009). In the social media environment, the customer posts opinions and questions about a
firm’s offer and other customers answer and comment. Consequently, in itself, the customer
becomes a vehicle of information toward other customers, and firms need to engage with
their customers to successfully exploit these new forms of marketing communication
(Brondoni, 2006).
Moreover, on social media, firms can improve the customer engagement “by providing
superior value than competitors to build trust and commitment in long-term relationships”
(Sashi, 2012, p. 260) but also by actively interacting and collaborating with customers in the
co-creation process of new products (Gummerus et al., 2012; Hollebeek et al., 2014).
According to Piller et al. (2012), customer co-creation can be described as a set of methods
that establish an active, creative and social collaboration process between producers and
customers in the context of new product development and determine a paradigm shift from
a manufacturer-active paradigm to a customer-active one.
Social media provides a useful channel for communicating with customers and obtaining
from them data, information or ideas. “Starbucks Ideas,” the social platform where
customers can share feedback, represents a good example of customer co-creation based on
social media applications (Chua and Banerjee, 2013). Thus, it is possible to argue that
through social media, firms can rely on using a co-creation approach to deal with their
innovativeness and open innovation purposes (Del Giudice and Della Peruta, 2013). In fact,
MRR the context of the internet of things has pushed companies to become more open to new
41,6 collaborative innovation approaches (Shin et al., 2017) where customers are considered not
just the final buyers of a product but innovation partners, especially inside social media
networks (Scuotto et al., 2017b; Scuotto et al., 2017c).
Knowledge management systems are proven to be able to simplify the creation of open
and collaborative ecosystems and the exploitation of internal and external flows of
660 knowledge, through the development of internal knowledge management capacity, which in
turn increases innovation capacity (Santoro et al., 2017). Moreover, social media platforms
have delivered new ways of sharing knowledge and communicating inside organizations
where specific factors drive and hamper the employees’ participation (Vuori and Okkonen,
2012; Razmerita et al., 2016). In fact, in the current competitive environment, knowledge
management can explain the existing connection between firm-level competitive advantage
and difficult-to-use knowledge assets (Carayannis et al., 2017).
As well as using social media for innovation and knowledge purposes, the marketing
relevance of social media for companies lies precisely in the interaction between consumers
and the community, and in immediate, interactive and low-cost communications (Kaplan
and Haenlein, 2011). Social media enhances the power of online communities in various
ways (Miller et al., 2009; Antonacci et al., 2017). First, social platforms stimulate among users
deep relationships that are richer than in the past. Second, they can produce a rapid
mobilization of the online community for a specific event such as a business promotion or
deal. Moreover, within social media, the knowledge generated by members is aggregated
into documents or Web pages that are frequently updated and corrected by other members
by deepening the diffusion of news and knowledge about company products or brands.
Because of the multitude of social media available, firms need to choose efficiently how to
construct their social presence by using different social media sites and defining in other
words what Weinberg and Pehlivan (2011) label as the “social media mix.” Each social
media site performs a particular task related to one of the functional blocks identified by
Kietzmann et al. (2011) such as, for example, identity, conversations or sharing. By
analyzing each block, firms can monitor and understand how social media varies, thereby
developing an efficient social media strategy by maximizing the return of their social
presence (Kumar and Mirchandani, 2012). In fact, social media management has been
recognized as a valuable solution for influencing relational outcomes, as online users can
display empathy toward a brand even if they cannot buy a firm’s product (Clark and
Melancon, 2013).
Drawing on brand community literature, Laroche et al. (2013) show that brand
communities on social media can improve brand trust and loyalty by enhancing customer
relationships with the brand, other customers, the firm and its products. These findings are
consistent both with previous studies on the positive effect of social media on brand loyalty
(Casalo et al., 2010) and with those (Fournier and Avery, 2011) proposing that social media
sites are designed to simplify interactions among users not solely for business purposes.
This results in customers’ improving their relationships with each other to improve brand
loyalty and trust. Thus, social media marketing appears as a very multifaceted field of
research and, recently, Keegan and Rowley (2017) have provided interesting insights on its
complexity.
In fact, the wide availability of digital channels and platforms makes it difficult for luxury
managers to choose which is best in designing a luxury brand strategy. Furthermore, the
customer experience is multisensory (Kapferer and Bastien, 2012), customers expect to feel
luxury products through all their senses, and the quality of this experience influences their
perceptions of the luxury brand. Digital channels could overcome the absence of physical
contact between seller and buyer by preserving the multisensory experience, for example,
through touch screen interfaces that increase a tactile interaction with products (Okonkwo,
2016).
In recent years, the rise of social media has brought new challenges for luxury brands,
even if, nowadays, the majority have already developed a social media presence to
effectively engage with customers (Kontu and Vecchi, 2014). While luxury brands have
always been fashion industry leaders, the entry of a number of new fashion brands in the
luxury market, due to the trend for affordable luxury, combined with a slowdown in sales,
has posed some difficulties (Kim and Ko, 2010). Thus, luxury firms have engaged in social
media to increase their brand exposure to a wider segment of the market, to stay relevant to
MRR younger customers, to leverage innovation (Choi et al., 2016; Scuotto et al., 2017a) and,
41,6 fundamentally, to beat the competition and increase sales (Gautam and Sharma, 2017; Kim
and Lee, 2017).
However, academic literature on the marketing opportunities for luxury brands related to
a strategic use of social media is still underdeveloped and fragmented, the relation existing
between social media and luxury remains largely unexplored. Therefore, this study aims at
662 setting out the state of the art of research on social media marketing by luxury brands and
mapping the addressed key research themes outlined in the following sections.
3. Research methodology
To analyze social media marketing academic literature focused on luxury brands, this study
used a systematic literature review approach (Webster and Watson, 2002; Busalim and
Hussin, 2016; Osobajo and Moore, 2017) to support theory development and discover
research areas that need further investigation. A systematic review refers to a process of
identifying, evaluating and interpreting all available research relevant to research questions
with the aim of summarizing the evidence about a phenomenon or a method and provide
new understanding (Kitchenham et al., 2009). A systematic literature review involves three
phases: planning, performing and reporting the review. Each step requires particular
activities: identify research questions, establish a review protocol, identify inclusion and
exclusion criteria, perform a quality assessment process and extract data and synthesize
(Busalim and Hussin, 2016).
The research question of this study was the following:
RQ1. What are the state of the art and the key research themes addressed in the
academic literature on social media marketing pertaining to luxury brands?
A review protocol was set in place to reduce research bias and was characterized in this
study by an initial background review of social media marketing and luxury brands. Next, a
definition of inclusion and exclusion criteria was useful in selecting publications specifically
related to this study. As the review is centered on analyzing the social media marketing
policies used by luxury brands, only those publications with available abstracts and full-
text, published in English and during the period 2010-2016 were considered. The period
2010-2016 was chosen to provide a full and deep understanding of the evolution of the topic
from its initial beginnings until the end of last year.
The search strategy consisted of two stages. First, an automatic stage provided a
primary result of studies related to social media marketing. According to Webster and
Watson (2002), the search process should not be limited to a specific range of academic
journals; therefore, three different online databases (ScienceDirect, Scopus, Thomas Routers
Web of Science) were searched to cover a broad range of publications. The three databanks
were selected as they can be considered the most pertinent to the business management
field.
In March 2017, the Scopus database was searched with the expression “social media
marketing” searched under “title,” “abstract” and “keywords.” The first filter provided a
score of 483 documents resulting in a time horizon of 2008-2017; publications not in English
were excluded which resulted in 476 publications. Subsequently, a second filter “luxury
brand” was entered in “title,” “abstract” and “keywords” and 15 results pertaining to the
considered time horizon 2010-2016 (Appendix 1) were found. In the ScienceDirect database,
by searching “social media marketing” automatically in “title,” “abstract” and “keywords,”
66 results appeared and, by filtering those into English related to luxury brands, only two
results emerged (already contained in the Scopus results). A similar situation occurred using
the Thomson Router of Web of Science database, where the first search provided 103 results Social media
and only one remained after using the other filters (also in this case, the paper was already marketing in
included in the Scopus results). Consequently, the Scopus database appeared as the most
inclusive and 15results were analyzed.
luxury brands
At this point, the second stage (manual stage) of the search strategy occurred. A full text
analysis of the results was carried out to exclude those that were not fully pertinent to the
study’s research question, two publications were removed and, finally, 13 publications
remained. Performing a quality assessment process represented a critical stage in 663
evaluating the quality of these studies and the following three criteria (Busalim and Hussin,
2016) were established:
(1) C1: Is the research methodology described in the study?
(2) C2: Is the data collection method described in the study?
(3) C3: Are the data analysis steps described in the study?
The 13 studies were evaluated according to these three criteria and distinguishing three
levels of quality: low, medium and high. For instance, studies that fully satisfy a criterion
obtain 2; those partially achieving a criterion obtain 1 and if they do not, zero. The outcomes
of the quality assessment are displayed in Figure 1, and the list of evaluation of each study is
presented in Appendix 2.
The majority (87 per cent) of studies were articles published in management academic
journals, and this can be considered a first signal of good quality, while the remaining
publications were book chapters (13 per cent). With regard to a temporal view of the
publications, they gradually increased in number from 2010 up to 2016 with a slight
decrease in 2013. Likely, there will be an increase in the article output as the research area
about digital marketing in luxury brands becomes more significant.
The research methods that have been adopted in the primary studies are displayed in
Figure 2; as can be seen, more than one third of studies (39 per cent), in particular surveys,
0.307692308
0.46153846
0.230769231 Figure 1.
Quality assessment
high medium low results
41,6
664
studies
MRR
Table I.
Data extraction and
synthesis of primary
Collection method Methodology
Document Conceptual
Study Year type Research theme Survey Case study Observation paper Review Qualitative Quantitative
(continued)
Collection method Methodology
Document Conceptual
Study Year type Research theme Survey Case study Observation paper Review Qualitative Quantitative
Table I.
marketing in
Social media
665
luxury brands
MRR used quantitative methodology. However, it emerged that there was a significant percentage
41,6 of qualitative studies (31 per cent), followed by reviews (15 per cent) and conceptual papers
(15 per cent).
Qualitative studies are mainly based on interviews and secondary sources, which can be
explained by the novelty of the topic, together with the exploratory nature of the initial
studies aimed at better defining a phenomenon never previously studied.
666 The research topics developed over the considered period (2010-2016) can be observed in
Table I. They centered on studying the influence of social media marketing activities on
customer–brand relationships covering the entire time period; in fact, this can be observed
since the first paper’s appearance (Kim and Ko, 2010). However, in recent years, studies on
social media marketing in luxury brands have seen an evolution. A study aimed at
understanding the main digital touch points with customers arose responding to the need
for more awareness of available digital opportunities (Heine and Berghaus, 2014). In
addition, recently, a new research theme has been introduced, namely, how luxury brands
deal with co-created brand images compared to mainstream brands (Hughes et al., 2016).
Therefore, to date, the addressed themes in the academic literature can be categorized
into the following four research areas (Figure 3):
(1) examination of the influence of social media marketing on luxury brand equity
(Kim and Ko, 2010, 2012; Phan and Park, 2014; Parrott et al., 2015; Godey et al.,
2016; Ko et al., 2016);
conceptual
15%
quantitative
39%
review
15%
Figure 2.
Percentage of
research
methodologies qualitative
31%
Figure 3.
Map of the addressed
research themes
(2) analysis of the marketing potential of social media for luxury brands in terms of Social media
customer engagement and retention (Jin, 2012; Ng, 2014; Dhaoui, 2014; Stokinger marketing in
and Ozuem, 2014, 2016);
luxury brands
(3) identification of major luxury brand – customer touchpoints (Heine and Berghaus,
2014); and
(4) social media opportunities for co-creation and collaboration with customers
(Hughes et al., 2016). 667
The paper further describes how Lancôme set up its Rose Beauty Community to
communicate and interact efficiently with Chinese customers and this community became
one of the top online beauty communities in China.
References
Antonacci, G., Fronzetti Colladon, A., Stefanini, A. and Gloor, P. (2017), “It is rotating leaders who build
the swarm: social network determinants of growth for healthcare virtual communities of
practice”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 1218-1239.
Arrigo, E. (2014a), “Social media opportunities for market-driven firms”, in Lee, I. (Ed.), Integrating
Social Media into Business Practice, Applications, Management, and Models, IGI Global,
Business Science Reference, Hershey, PA.
Arrigo, E. (2014b), “Luxury brands enter the online market”, in Berghaus, B, Müller-Stewens, G. and
Reinecke, S. (Eds), The Management of Luxury: A Practitioner’s Handbook, Kogan Page
Publishers, London.
Arrigo, E. (2016), “The influence of social media management on firms’ competitiveness”, in Lee, I. (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of E-Commerce Development, Implementation, and Management, IGI Global,
Business Science Reference, Hershey, PA.
Berthon, P.R., Pitt, L.F., Plangger, K. and Shapiro, D. (2012), “Marketing meets web 2.0, social media,
and creative consumers: implications for international marketing strategy”, Business Horizons,
Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 261-271.
Bharati, P., Zhang, W. and Chaudhury, A. (2015), “Better knowledge with social media? Exploring the
roles of social capital and organizational knowledge management”, Journal of Knowledge
Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 456-475.
Brondoni, S.M. (2006), “Corporate communication and global market”, Symphonya. Emerging Issues in
Management, Vol. 2, pp. 9-37.
Bruhn, M., Schoenmueller, V. and Schäfer, D.B. (2012), “Are social media replacing traditional
media in terms of brand equity creation?”, Management Research Review, Vol. 35 No. 9,
pp. 770-790.
Busalim, A.H. and Hussin, A.R.C. (2016), “Understanding social commerce: a systematic literature
review and directions for further research”, International Journal of Information Management,
Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1075-1088.
Carayannis, E.G. (2010), Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, Springer, New York,
NY.
Carayannis, E.G., Grigoroudis, E., Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M.R. and Sindakis, S. (2017), “An
exploration of contemporary organizational artifacts and routines in a sustainable excellence
context”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 35-56.
Casalo, L.V., Flavián, C. and Guinalíu, M. (2010), “Relationship quality, community promotion and
brand loyalty in virtual communities: evidence from free software communities”, International
Journal of Information Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 357-367.
MRR Chevalier, M. and Gutsatz, M. (2012), Luxury Retail Management: How the World’s Top Brands Provide
Quality Product and Service Support, John Wiley & Son, Singapore.
41,6 Chevalier, M. and Mazzalovo, G. (2012), Luxury Brand Management: A World of Privilege, John Wiley
& Sons, New York, NY.
Choi, E., Ko, E. and Kim, A.J. (2016), “Explaining and predicting purchase intentions following luxury-
fashion brand value co-creation encounters”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 12,
pp. 5827-5832.
674 Chua, A.Y.K. and Banerjee, S. (2013), “Customer knowledge management via social media: the case of
Starbucks”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 237-249.
Clark, M. and Melancon, J. (2013), “The influence of social media investment on relational outcomes: a
relationship marketing perspective”, International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol. 5 No. 4,
pp. 132-142.
Constantinides, E. and Fountain, S.J. (2008), “Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing issues”,
Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 231-244.
Coulter, K.S. (2012), “Special issue on ‘marketing and social media”, Management Research Review,
Vol. 35 No. 9.
Del Giudice, M. and Della Peruta, M.R. (2013), Unpacking Open Innovation: Highlights from a Co-
Evolutionary Inquiry, Springer, New York, NY.
Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M.R. and Carayannis, E.G. (2013), Social Media and Emerging Economies:
Technological, Cultural and Economic Implications, Springer Science & Business Media,
New York, NY.
Dhaoui, C. (2014), “An empirical study of luxury brand marketing effectiveness and its impact on
consumer engagement on Facebook”, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 209-222.
Dubois, D. (2015), Proceedings of the ‘Online Luxury Retailing’ Conference, 30 April-1 May, New York, NY.
Fionda, A.M. and Moore, C.M. (2009), “The anatomy of the luxury fashion Brand”, Journal of Brand
Management, Vol. 16 Nos 5/6, pp. 347-363.
Fournier, S. and Avery, J. (2011), “The uninvited Brand”, Business Horizons, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 193-207.
Gautam, V. and Sharma, V. (2017), “The mediating role of customer relationship on the social media
marketing and purchase intention relationship with special reference to luxury fashion brands”,
Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 1-17.
Godey, B., Manthiou, A., Pederzoli, D., Rokka, J., Aiello, G., Donvito, R. and Singh, R. (2016), “Social
media marketing efforts of luxury brands: influence on Brand equity and consumer behaviour”,
Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 12, pp. 5833-5841.
Gummerus, J., Liljander, V., Weman, E. and Pihlström, M. (2012), “Customer engagement in a Facebook
brand community”, Management Research Review, Vol. 35 No. 9, pp. 857-877.
Heine, K. (2010), “The personality of luxury fashion brands”, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing,
Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 154-163.
Heine, K. and Berghaus, B. (2014), “Luxury goes digital: how to tackle the digital luxury brand-
consumer touchpoints”, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 223-234.
Hennings, N., Wiedmann, K.P. and Klarmann, C. (2012), “Luxury brands in the digital age – exclusivity
versus ubiquity”, Marketing Review St. Gallen, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 30-35.
Hoffman, D.L. and Fodor, M. (2010), “Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing?”, MIT
Sloan Management Review, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 41-49.
Hollebeek, L.D., Glynn, M.S. and Brodie, R.J. (2014), “Consumer brand engagement in social media:
conceptualization, scale development and validation”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 28
No. 2, pp. 149-165.
Hughes, Ü.M., Bendoni, W.K. and Pehlivan, E. (2016), “Storygiving as a co-creation tool for luxury
brands in the age of the internet: a love story by tiffany and thousands of lovers”, Journal of
Product & Brand Management, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 357-364.
Jin, S.-A.A. (2012), “The potential of social media for luxury brand management”, Marketing Intelligence Social media
& Planning, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 687-699.
marketing in
Kapferer, J.N. (2014), “The future of luxury: challenges and opportunities”, Journal of Brand
Management, Vol. 21 No. 9, pp. 716-726.
luxury brands
Kapferer, J.N. and Bastien, V. (2012), The Luxury Strategy: break the Rules of Marketing to Build Luxury
Brands, Kogan Page Publishers, London.
Kapferer, J.N. and Valette-Florence, P. (2016), “Beyond rarity: the paths of luxury desire: how luxury 675
brands grow yet remain desirable”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 25 No. 2,
pp. 120-133.
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010), “Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of
social media”, Business Horizons, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 59-68.
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2011), “Two hearts in three-quarter time: how to waltz the social media/
viral marketing dance”, Business Horizons, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 253-263.
Keegan, B.J. and Rowley, J. (2017), “Evaluation and decision making in social media marketing”,
Management Decision, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 15-31.
Keller, K.L. (2009), “Managing the growth tradeoff: challenges and opportunities in luxury branding”,
Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 16 Nos 5/6, pp. 290-301.
Kietzmann, J.H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I.P. and Silvestre, B.S. (2011), “Social media? Get serious!
Understanding the functional building blocks of social media”, Business Horizons, Vol. 54 No. 3,
pp. 241-251.
Kim, A.J. and Ko, E. (2010), “Impacts of luxury fashion brand’s social media marketing on customer
relationship and purchase intention”, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 1 No. 3,
pp. 164-171.
Kim, A.J. and Ko, E. (2012), “Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An
empirical study of luxury fashion brand”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 65 No. 10,
pp. 1480-1486.
Kim, J. and Lee, K.H. (2017), “Influence of integration on interactivity in social media luxury brand
communities”, Journal of Business Research (in press).
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O.P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J. and Linkman, S. (2009), “Systematic
literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review”, Information and
Software Technology, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 7-15.
Ko, E., Phau, I. and Aiello, G. (2016), “Luxury Brand strategies and customer experiences:
contributions to theory and practice”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 12,
pp. 5749-5752.
Kontu, H. and Vecchi, A. (2014), “Why all that noise–assessing the strategic value of social media for
fashion brands”, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 235-250.
Kumar, V. and Mirchandani, R. (2012), “Increasing the ROI of social media marketing”, MIT Sloan
Management Review, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 55-61.
Lamberton, C. and Stephen, A.T. (2016), “A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile
marketing: research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry”, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 80 No. 6, pp. 146-172.
Laroche, M., Habibi, M.R. and Richard, M.O. (2013), “To be or not to be in social media: how brand
loyalty is affected by social media?”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 33
No. 1, pp. 76-82.
Levy, M. (2013), “Stairways to heaven: implementing social media in organizations”, Journal of
Knowledge Management, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 741-754.
Mangold, W.G. and Faulds, D.J. (2009), “Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix”,
Business Horizons, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 357-365.
MRR Michaelidou, N., Siamagka, N.T. and Christodoulides, G. (2011), “Usage, barriers and measurement of
social media marketing: an exploratory investigation of small and medium B2B brands”,
41,6 Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 40 No. 7, pp. 1153-1159.
Miller, K.D., Fabian, F. and Lin, S.J. (2009), “Strategies for online communities”, Strategic Management
Journal, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 305-322.
Ng, M. (2014), “Social media and luxury fashion brands in China: the case of coach”, Journal of Global
676 Fashion Marketing, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 251-265.
Ngai, E.W.T., Tao, S. and Moon, K.K.L. (2015), “Social media research: theories, constructs and
conceptual frameworks”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 35 No. 1,
pp. 33-44.
Nieto, M.J. and Santamaría, L. (2007), “The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty
of product innovation”, Technovation, Vol. 27 Nos 6/7, pp. 367-377.
Okonkwo, U. (2010), Luxury Online: Styles, Systems, Strategies, Springer, New York, NY.
Okonkwo, U. (2016), Luxury Fashion Branding: Trends, Tactics, Techniques, Springer, New York, NY.
Osobajo, O.A. and Moore, D. (2017), “Methodological choices in relationship quality (RQ) research
1987 to 2015: a systematic literature review”, Journal of Relationship Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 1,
pp. 40-81.
Parrott, G., Danbury, A. and Kanthavanich, P. (2015), “Online behaviour of luxury fashion brand
advocates”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 19
No. 4, pp. 360-383.
Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A.M., Ognibeni, B. and Pauwels, K. (2013), “Social media metrics – a
framework and guidelines for managing social media”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 27
No. 4, pp. 281-298.
Phan, M. and Park, S.-Y. (2014), “Introduction: social media marketing and luxury brands”, Journal of
Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 195-196.
Phan, M., Thomas, R. and Heine, K. (2011), “Social media and luxury brand management: the case of
burberry”, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 213-222.
Piller, F.T., Vossen, A. and Ihl, C. (2012), “From social media to social product development: the
impact of social media on co-creation of innovation”, Die Unternehmung, Vol. 65 No. 1,
pp. 1-22.
Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K. and Nielsen, P. (2016), “What factors influence knowledge sharing in
organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication”, Journal of
Knowledge Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 1225-1246.
Risius, M. and Beck, R. (2015), “Effectiveness of corporate social media activities in increasing
relational outcomes”, Information & Management, Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 824-839.
Safko, L. (2010), The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success, John Wiley
& Sons, New York, NY.
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A. and Dezi, L. (2017), “The internet of things: building a knowledge
management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity”, Technological
Forecasting and Social Change (in press).
Sashi, C.M. (2012), “Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media”, Management
Decision, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 253-272.
Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., Bresciani, S. and Meissner, D. (2017a), “Knowledge driven preferences in
informal inbound open innovation modes: an explorative view on small to medium enterprises”,
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 640-655.
Scuotto, V., Santoro, G., Bresciani, S. and Del Giudice, M. (2017b), “Shifting intra-and inter-
organizational innovation processes towards digital business: an empirical analysis of SMEs”,
Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 247-255.
Scuotto, V., Santoro, G., Papa, A. and Carayannis, E.G. (2017c), “Triggering open service innovation Social media
through social media networks”, Mercati & Competitività, Vol. 3, pp. 21-40.
marketing in
Shin, S.R., Han, J., Marhold, K. and Kang, J. (2017), “Reconfiguring the firm’s core technological portfolio
through open innovation: focusing on technological M&A”, Journal of Knowledge Management,
luxury brands
Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 571-591.
Stokinger, E. and Ozuem, W. (2014), “Social media and customer retention: implications for the luxury
beauty industry”, Computer-Mediated Marketing Strategies: Social Media and Online Brand
Communities, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 200-222. 677
Stokinger, E. and Ozuem, W. (2016), “The intersection of social media and customer retention in the
luxury beauty industry”, Competitive Social Media Marketing Strategies, IGI Global, Hershey,
PA, pp. 235-258.
Stone, M.D. and Woodcock, N.D. (2014), “Interactive, direct and digital marketing: a future that depends
on better use of business intelligence”, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 8 No. 1,
pp. 4-17.
Tynan, C., McKechnie, S. and Chhuon, C. (2010), “Co-creating value for luxury brands”, Journal of
Business Research, Vol. 63 No. 11, pp. 1156-1163.
Vuori, V. and Okkonen, J. (2012), “Knowledge sharing motivational factors of using an intra-
organizational social media platform”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 16 No. 4,
pp. 592-603.
Wang, Z. and Kim, H.G. (2017), “Can social media marketing improve customer relationship capabilities
and firm performance? Dynamic capability perspective”, Journal of Interactive Marketing,
Vol. 39, pp. 15-26.
Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. (2002), “Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature
review”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 13-23.
Weinberg, B.D. and Pehlivan, E. (2011), “Social spending: managing the social media mix”, Business
Horizons, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 275-282.
Appendix 2
1 1 2 2 5 High
2 REMOVED
3 2 2 2 6 High
4 2 2 2 6 High
5 1 1 1 3 Medium
6 1 1 1 3 Medium
7 0 0 0 0 Low
8 2 2 2 High
9 0 2 2 Low
10 2 1 2 5 High
11 REMOVED
12 2 2 Low
13 1 1 1 3 Medium
Table AI. 14 2 2 2 6 High
Quality assessment 15 0 0 0 0 Low
About the author Social media
Elisa Arrigo, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Management at the University of Milan-Bicocca, marketing in
Department of Economics, Management and Statistics (DEMS), Milan (Italy). She holds a PhD in
Marketing and Business Management from the University of Milan-Bicocca, and during her PhD luxury brands
studies, she was a Visiting Scholar at the Stockholm School of Business (Sweden) and London
Business School (UK). She teaches marketing and corporate global communication at the University
of Milan-Bicocca, and her research interests lie primarily in global business management with a
particular reference to luxury and fashion firms. She has published books, book chapters and papers 679
in managerial academic journals based on various aspects of her research topics, and she is an active
reviewer for various management journals and conferences. Elisa Arrigo can be contacted at: elisa.
[email protected]
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: [email protected]