Teknomekanik

Vol.3, No.2, December 2020, pp. 56-61

e-ISSN: 2621-8720 p-ISSN: 2621-9980  56

The Effect of AC (alternating current) and DC (direct current) on

Bend Testing Results of Low Carbon Steel Welding Joints
Zetri Firmanda, Abdul Aziz & Bulkia Rahim
Departement of Mechanical, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang

Article Info ABSTRACT

Article history: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of alternating current
Received Jun 03th, 2020 (AC) and direct current (DC) on the bend testing results of low carbon steel
Revised Aug 09th, 2020 welding joints. The results of this study are expected to determine the cracks
Accepted Nov 26th, 2020 that occur from the root bend and face bend testings in the AC and DC welding
process. This study used experimental method, where the research was done
by giving AC and direct polarity DC (DC-) SMAW welding treatments. The
Keywords: material used in this research was low carbon steel plate DIN 17100 Grade
ST 44, thickness 10 with E7016 electrode type. The process of welding joints
SMAW used a single V seam, strong current of 90A, and the welding position of 1G.
AC and DC currents The testing of welding joints was carried out by bend testing using the standard
Bend Testing acceptance of AWS D1.1 root bend and face bend testing results. The results
Low Carbon Steel of the bend testing showed that the AC welding root bend test specimen held
no cracks while the DC welding root bend test held cracks with incompelete
penetration and open crack defects. On the contrary, the AC welding face bend
test had open crack defects and in the DC welding face bend test was found a
crack. Thus, there was a difference in the crack resistance of the welding joint
from the types of current used through the root bend test and face bend test.
Therefore, it can be summarized that AC welding is better for root welding
and DC welding is good for capping welding.

Copyright © 2020 Universitas Negeri Padang.

All rights reserved.

Corresponding Author:
Zetri Firmanda,
Departement of Mechanical, Faculty of Engineering,
Universitas Negeri Padang,
Jln. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar, Padang (25131)
Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]

1. INTRODUCTION
The development of production technology using advanced metal raw materials plays a very important
role in the use of welding technology. Nowadays, in this industrialization era, the utilization of metal welding
technology is widely used for the connection process especially in the engineering sector [1]. In fact, buildings
and machines made by welding techniques have the advantage whichthe welding joints result will be strong,
tight, and easy to use [2]. One of the connection processes that are often used is Shielded Metal Art Welding
(SMAW) or also known as electric arc welding [3]. Electric arc welding is a metal joining process using a heat
source from an electric arc flame to melt the metal [4]. There are two types of electric arc welding machines,
namely alternating current (AC) electricity and Direct Current (DC) electricity [5]. In the AC welding machine,
the heat generated by the ends of the positive and negative poles is equal in proportion (50%: 50%), whereas
in DC welding machine the heat is generated by 30% of the positive pole and 70% of the negative pole [6].
Welding using AC power has the advantage that AC power is easier in terms of equipment and maintenance
than DC power which is slightly more complicated [7].
There are two types of polarity installation on welding machines, namely straight polarity and reverse
polarity [8]. Straight polarity is often called the electric welding cycle with negative electrodes (DC-), while
reverse polarity is often referred to the electric welding cycle with positive electrodes (DC+) [9]. The weakness
of straight polarity is that the penetration is shallow, whereas the penetration of reverse polarity is deeper [10].

Journal homepage:http://teknomekanik.ppj.unp.ac.id
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/teknomekanik.v3i2.6272
Vol.3, No.2, December 2020, pp. 56-61  57

According to Despa's research [6], the depth of penetration, the width and the height of welding path using DC
electricity is better than AC. The welding input parameters that influence welding penetration are welding
current, welding voltage, and welding speed [11]. Welding parameters are necessary to achieve the desired
penetration in welding joint [12]. The amount of electric current given can affect the weld area and the strength
of the weld metal [13]. The type of seam used also has an impact on the strength outcome of the weld [14].
The way to determine the mechanical properties of the metal material is by conducting testing such as
tensile testing, hardness testing, bend testing, impact testing, and so on [15]. These testings are included in the
type of testing that is destructive [16]. Bend testing is performed tovisually determine the cracks andto
determine the quality and welding defects of a material [17]. Welding defects include fusion areas, weld metal,
HAZ andunaffected base metal [18]. There are two types of bend testing, namely root bend and face bend [19].
Low carbon steels can be welded by various welding methods [20]. Low carbon steels have good weldability
and have a low weld crack sensitivity compared to other carbon steels [21]. Low carbon steels are the most
common used due to their affordable price and superior mechanical properties such as tensile strength and
toughness, and they are acceptable for many engineering applications [22]. Research on bend testing has been
carried out by several researchers. For instance, miftahrur [23] conducted research with the aim of knowing
the Effect of Low Hydrogen E7016 Electrode Storage Temperature on Bend testing Results of SS400 Carbon
Steel Plate Welding Joints.The result of this study is the higher the storage temperature is, the better it will
produce crack resistance. From this previous research, only bend testingwas done by the temperature treatment
to electrode heating and heating treament to the material. Therefore this study provides welding treatment with
different current sources. This study aims to further reveal the effect of AC and DC on the bend testing of
single V seam welding joints on steel material DIN 17100 Grade ST 44.

2. METHOD
This research was using experimental method. The object of research was the result of welding joints of
low carbon steel plates DIN 17100 Grade ST 44 with 10 mm thickness using SMAW welding.The electrodes
used was E7016 with diameter of Ø2.6 and Ø3.2 mm using strong current of 90 A with direct penetration (DC-
). The connection used in this study was a single seam V. The welding process on the sample was carried out
with downhand position (1G). The treatment given was by using AC and DC welding. The research diagram
can be seen in Figure 1.

Preparation Welding

AC DC (DC-Polarity)

Specimen
formation and Analysis Conclusion Completed
testing

Figure 1. Research diagram

The connection form used a single V groove with a weld angle of 60º, root face of 2 mm and root gap of
2 mm which was formed by a grinder anda file [24], as seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2. V groove

Journal homepage:http://teknomekanik.ppj.unp.ac.id
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/teknomekanik.v3i2.6272
58  Vol.3, No.2, December 2020, pp. 56-61

This study usedbend testing with two types of tests, namely root bend and face bend. Bend testing data
was collected by measuring discontinuities or defects that occured on the curved surface of the test
specimen.Then to state the test results either acceptable or not,it would be based on the acceptance criteria of
the bend testing according to the AWS D1.1 standard, namely the curved surface does not exceed the
discontinuity; (1) 3 mm measured in any direction on the surface, (2) 10 mm the sum of the greatest dimensions
of all discontinuities exceeding 1 mm, but less than or equal to 3 mm, and (3) 6 mm maximum crack angle,
except when the angle is cracks as the result of visible slag inclusions or other fusion type discontinuities,
hence a maximum of 3 mm applies [25]. The specimens that had been joined were subsequently leveled by
grinding the surface and the roots of the weld to produce a flat surface with the plate. Then it was formed into
a bend testing according to the AWS D1.1 standard as shown below.

Figure 3. AWS D1.1 Specimen Standard Face Bend and Root Bend [25].

3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

There are the results of bend testing data with AC and DC welding treatment. Figure 4 is the result of the
bend testing, which was carried out to visually see the cracks that occur in the test specimen as seen below.

a b c d

Crack Open crack Incomplete penetration Crack

Figure 4. Bend Testing Specimens

Figure 4 shows the specimens after the bend testing; figure (a) was the root bend test specimen with AC
welding treatment, figure (b) was the face bend test specimen with AC welding treatment, figure (c) was the
root bend test specimen with DC welding treatment, and figure (d) was face bend test specimen with DC
welding treatment. It can be seen in Figure 4 that the specimen figure (a) had no cracks; in figure (b) there were
crack and open crack, in figure (c) there were cracks with open crack defects and incomplete penetration, and
in figure (d) there was crack defect.

Table 2. The dataresults of bend testing specimens

Journal homepage:http://teknomekanik.ppj.unp.ac.id
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/teknomekanik.v3i2.6272
Vol.3, No.2, December 2020, pp. 56-61  59

Information
Specimen
Treatmeant Test type Kind of The result
code Size (mm) Location
defect
A1 Root Bend - - - Accepted
A2 Root Bend - - - Accepted
AC Crack 2,2 x 0,4
A3 Face Bend HAZ Accepted
Welding Open crack 1,6 x 0,6
Weld
A4 Face Bend Open crack 1,7 x 0,5 Accepted
metal
Incomplete Not
B1 Root Bend 14 x 4,4 HAZ
penetration Accepted
1,6 x 0,6
DC B2 Root Bend Open crack HAZ Accepted
1,9 x 1,1
Welding
Weld
B3 Face Bend Crack 2,1 x 0,4 Accepted
metal
B4 Face Bend - - - Accepted

AC Welding DC Welding

17,5

5,5
2,1
0

Root Bend Face Bend

Figure 5.Graph of the Total Crack Length of Bend Testing Results

From the results of bend testing (of the root bend and face bend) with AC welding treatment, the root
bend test results of specimens A1 and A2 had no cracks, but there were cracks in the face bend test results of
A3 specimens and open crack defects in specimen A4. However, both of these tests were accepted because the
cracks occurred did not exceed the bend testing acceptance criteria according to the AWS D1.1 standard. On
the other side, There werethe results of the root bend and face bend testings with DC welding treatment. From
the results of the root bend tests, there were cracks in specimen B1 with open crack defects which were accepted
and specimen B2 with incomplete penetration defects were declared unacceptable because the cracks occurred
exceed the criteria for the acceptance of the appropriate bend testing AWS D1.1 standard. In the face bend test,
there were crack defects in specimen B3, but there was no cracks in specimen B. These two tests were accepted
because the cracks occurred did not exceed the criteria for acceptance of the bend testing according to the AWS
D1.1 standard.
Based on the results of the face bend testing data, it shows that the two treatments given were accepted.
In the root bend testing results, the AC welding was accepted, while the DC welding was not accepted based
on the AWS D1.1 standard. After being tested, there were cracks with each size <3 mm and the number of
cracks <10 mm which can be seen in table 2, based on the standard, only cracks in the root bend on DC welding
were declared unacceptable while others were declared accepted. In short, from the results of the data, this test
shows a difference in the crack resistance of the welding joint from the type of current used through the root
bend test and face bend test. The crack resistance in the AC root bend test is better than the DC root bend test,
whereas the crack occured in DC face bend test is better than the AC face bend test.

Journal homepage:http://teknomekanik.ppj.unp.ac.id
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/teknomekanik.v3i2.6272
60  Vol.3, No.2, December 2020, pp. 56-61

4. CONCLUSION
Based on the data analysis and the discussion of bend testing in this study, The results of the bend testing
showed that the AC welding root bend test specimen held no cracks while the DC welding root bend test held
cracks with incompelete penetration and open crack defects. On the contrary, the AC welding face bend test
had open crack defects and in the DC welding face bend test was found a crack. Thus, there was a difference
in the crack resistance of the welding joint from the types of current used through the root bend test and face
bend test. Therefore, it can be summarized that AC welding is better for root welding and DC welding is good
for capping welding.

REFERENCES

[1] B.V.M.Engineering College, V.V. Nagar, Anand,Gujarat. Review for Design of Gripper in Universal
Testing Machine.International Journal for Scientific Research & Development.2016; Vol 4(1).
[2] Munawar et al. The Effects of Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) Welding On TheMechanical
Characteristics With Heating Treatment inn S45c Steel. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. doi
:10.1088/1742-6596/962/1/012063.
[3] Bodude, MA., Momohjimoh, I., Studies on Effects of Welding Parameters on the Mechanical Properties
of Welded Low-Carbon Steel. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering. 2015;
Vol 3: 142-53.
[4] Hendri, N.,Yolli, F., Meisuri, H.Analysis of Tensile Strength the Fiber Bagasse Particles Board with Resin
Adhesives. Teknomekanik.2018; Vol.1(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.24036/tm.v1i1.172
[5] Harsono Wiryosumarto, T. O. Teknologi Pengelasan Logam. Jakarta: Pratya Pramita. 2008.
[6] Despa Wandri., Purwantono., Pengaruh Arus AC dan DC terhadap Hasil Pengelasan pada Las Busur
Listrik. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin. 2016 : 1-7.
[7] Arifin. Las Litrik dan Otogen. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia; 1997
[8] Daryanto. Teknik Las. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2014
[9] Jeffus, L. Welding and Metal Fabrication. United States of America: Cengage Learning; 2012.
[10] Widharto, S., Welding Inspection. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media; 2013.
[11] Devendra Yadav & Abhishek Gaikwad. Comparison And Testing Of Tensile Strength For Low &
Medium Carbon Steel. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering (IJME). 2015;Vol.4(5) : 1-8.
[12] Wari, A., Nurdin, H., & Ya, K. Porosity Defect Analysis in ST 37 Steel Welding Joints Using the Dye
Penetrant Method. Teknomekanik. 2020; Vol (1) : 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24036/tm.v3i1.5272
[13] M. Agung P., Jasman, Nelvi, E., Yolli, F. The Variation Effectof Electric Current Toward Tensile
Strength on Low Carbon Steel Welding with Electrode E7018. Teknomekanik. 2020; Vol.3(1) : 9-
17.https://doi.org/10.24036/tm.v3i1.5572
[14] Odebiyi, O.S., Adedayo, S.M., Tunji, L.A., Onuorah, M.O., A Review of Weldability of Carbon Steel in
Arc-Based Welding Processes. Cogent Engineering. 2019; 6 (1) : 1-32.
[15] M. U. Deshpande, J. M. Kshirsagar, Dr. H. M. Dharmadhikari. Optimization of GMAW Process
Parameters to Improve the Length of Penetration in EN 10025 S 235 Grade. Journal of Welding and
Joining. Vol.32 (1)..
[16] Hendronursito Y, Isnugroho K, Birawidha DC, Amin M. Analysis Of Shielded Metal Arc Welding
(SMAW)On HighManganese Steel Hammer-mill Crushe. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2019;
Vol.16 (2).
[17] Ameen A. Nassar, Rafil M. Lefta and Muthanna J. Abdulsada. Experimental Study of The Effect of
Welding Electrode Types on Tensile Properties of Low Carbon Steel Aisi1010. Kufa Journal of
Engineering.2018; Vol. 9(4) : 163-173.
[18] Dadi, A., Goyal, P.B., Patel, M.H., A Review Paper on Optimization of Shielded Metal Arc Welding
Parameters for Welding of (Ms) Sa-516 Gr.70 Plate by Using Taguchi Approach. International Journal
of Scientific Research in Science and Technology. Vol 4(5): 1536-43. 2018.
[19] Wibowo, H., Surahmanto, F., Peningkatan Kekuatan Mekanis dan Ketahanan Retak Las pada Sambungan
Las Busur Elektroda Terbungkus Melalui Pemanasan awal pada Elektroda. Prosiding Seminar Nasional
Rekayasa Teknologi Industri dan Informasi ke-6. 2011.

Journal homepage:http://teknomekanik.ppj.unp.ac.id
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/teknomekanik.v3i2.6272
Vol.3, No.2, December 2020, pp. 56-61  61

[20] Nutalapati, S., Azad, D,D., Naidu, D.G.S., Effect of Welding Current on Welding Speed and Ultimate
Tensile Strenght on (UTS) of Mild Steel. International Journal of Mechanical Enggineering and
Tecnology. 2016; Vol 7: 156-76.
[21] Jasman, J., Irzal, I., Adri, J., & Pebrian, P. Effect of Strong Welding Flow on the Violence of Low Carbon
Steel Results of SMAW Welding with Electrodes 7018. Teknomekanik. 2018; 1 (1) : 24-31.
https://doi.org/10.24036/tm.v1i1.972
[22] Devendra Yadav & Abhishek Gaikwad. Comparison And Testing Of Tensile Strength For Low &
Medium Carbon Steel. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering (IJME). 2015; Vol.4(5) : 1-8.
[23] Miftahrur B. Afan.,dkk., Pengaruh Suhu Penyimpanan Eloktroda Low Hydrogen E7016 terhadap Hasil
Uji Tekuk Sambungan Las Pelat Baja Karbon SS400. Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin. 2020; Vol 15: 20-
25.http://dx.doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v15i1.1823
[24] Nazli, EzgiI, Peka., Faruk, Elaldi.Analysis of Welding Groove Angle and Geometry on Strength of Armor
Steel. Materials and Manufacturing Processes.2012; Vol (27) 12: 1437-
1441.https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2012.709343
[25] American Welding Society. Structural Welding Code-Steel. D1.1/D1.1M. 2015.

Journal homepage:http://teknomekanik.ppj.unp.ac.id
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/teknomekanik.v3i2.6272