Level III of CFA Program Mock Exam 1 - Solutions (PM)
Level III of CFA Program Mock Exam 1 - Solutions (PM)
Level III of CFA Program Mock Exam 1 - Solutions (PM)
FinQuiz.com
Level III of CFA Program
Mock Exam 1
June 2020
Revision 2
Kathy Mooney works for Ace Investment Management (AIM) as a portfolio manager and
investment advisor. Mooney is one of the most senior portfolio managers at the firm and
has worked through AIM’s early development phases. After ten years since
establishment, AIM has now managed to earn a sound standing amongst its competitors,
and has attracted a diverse set of private wealth and institutional clients. Due to Mooney’s
seniority and initial assistance in founding the firm, AIM pays her a competitive base
salary along with lucrative fringe benefits. In addition, Mooney receives additional
monetary compensation when she is successful in the sales process and generation of
assets under management for AIM. Hence, during client meetings, Mooney often
mentions the services her firm offers, how they are unique, what new product offerings
AIM has launched and how they might be an attractive inclusion to their portfolios. The
assets generated through such marketing are invested in proprietary offerings such as
affiliate mutual funds and in-house investment vehicles. Mooney does not disclose this
compensation agreement to clients and prospects.
Mooney earned the right to use the Chartered Financial Analyst designation three years
back and now participates in the CFA Examination Grading Program. Prior to
participation in the program, Mooney signed the Grader Agreement where she agreed not
to reveal or discuss examination materials with anyone except CFA Institute staff and
other graders. One month back, Mooney completed the CFA examination grading for
Level III candidates. Recently, during a conversation with some Level III candidates at
AIM who had appeared for the exam, Mooney mentioned the questions she graded and
how students performed on the questions on average.
Due to her participation in the CFA Institute Grading Program, Mooney has made
contacts with a number of professional figures in the investment community. John Reitz,
a portfolio manager and a CFA charterholder, is one such figure that Mooney has
managed to be friends with. Reitz works for an investment firm with branches nation-
wide, and is also a member of the CFA Institute Investment Performance Council (IPC).
The IPC is responsible for the creation and revision of the CFA Institute performance
presentation standards. Since Reitz has advanced knowledge of any changes or revisions
to be made in the standards, he uses this information to assist his firm in keeping up with
the changes to the standards. This ensures that his firm is in complete compliance with
the changes and is following best practice with regards to performance presentation.
Mooney believes that this is essential to provide fair and accurate information to clients
and prospects.
Mooney has been assigned the task of preparing marketing material for Ace Investment
Management to be distributed to prospective clients. In preparing the material, Mooney
plans to include the following information:
1. Ace Investment Management includes five employees that are charter holders.
Two employees are expected to complete the Level 2 examination by early 2010.
2. Ace Investment Management also recruits portfolio managers from around the
globe to bring diversity to their employee base. Two of them are John Doe and
Kelly Dustin, both of whom have CFA-equivalent program degrees.
3. AIM encourages its employees to enroll in the CFA Program to obtain the highest
set of credentials in the global investment management industry.”
After work, Mooney decided to visit her friends, Randy Singer and Tony Deale. Singer is
a successful portfolio manager and a CFA charter holder. However, after twenty years of
working in the investment industry, Singer finally decided to retire. Since he is no longer
working for any firm, nor is engaged in the investment industry, he does not file a
Professional Conduct Statement with the CFA Institute. When his friends ask him for his
contact number, Singer hands out a plain business card with his new contact details where
he uses ‘CFA’ after his name.
Deale is a young portfolio manager who recently joined an investment management firm
as a financial analyst. Deale has earned both his CFA designation and a PhD in finance
and investment. Deale completed the PhD after earning the CFA charter. When designing
his business card, Deale cited the CFA designation after listing her PhD.
Mooney has just been hired as a consultant by Jenna Levine, a chemical engineer with a
fifteen years experience with Oxy-Chemicals (OXC), a leading firm in the chemicals
industry. After her tenure at OXC, Levine joined an investment firm as a research analyst
covering the chemicals industry. During her time at the firm, Levine invested her own
portfolio in a number of firms in the chemicals industry and made significant money
based on her research. However, most of her portfolio still constitutes her ownership in
OXC, which she earned through an ESOP at the firm. Just recently, Levine was hired by
Hydro-Chemicals (HYC) to devise a strategy that would increase the firm’s operating
efficiency. As part of the strategy, Levine instructed HYC to share resources and profits
with OXC. Her detailed analysis indicated that working with OXC would reduce costs, -
eliminate excessive wastage and increase profits. The board of HYC is, however,
skeptical of the plan’s appropriateness, given Levine’s personal portfolio composition.
A. No.
B. Yes, because sales efforts attempting to attract new investment
management clients need not disclose this fact.
C. Yes, because the Standards do not prohibit Mooney from generating new
business for her employer since it is obvious to clients and prospects that
she is referring to the services of AIM.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 1, Reading 2.
Mooney does not follow best practice. In this case, the assets will be managed in
‘proprietary product offerings’ of the manager’s company and Mooney will
receive additional compensation for selling firm products. Although some
sophisticated investors may realize that it would be financially beneficial to
Mooney and her firm if the investor buys the product offerings of the firm, best
practice dictates that Mooney should disclose to clients that she is compensated
for referring clients to firm products. Such disclosure will meet the purpose of
Standard 6 (C) ‘Referral Fees’.
2. With respect to her discussion with Level III candidates, has Mooney most likely
violated Standard 7 (A) ‘Conduct as Members and Candidates in the CFA
Program’ of the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
A. Yes.
B. No, because she discussed the questions with students who had already
appeared for the exam.
C. No, because she not only discussed the questions with CFA candidates
who had already appeared for the exam and knew the questions, she
disclosed the information well after the exam was over.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 1, Reading 2.
Mooney has violated the Standard by breaking the Grader Agreement and
disclosing information related to specific questions on the examination, which
compromised the integrity of the examination process.
3. Is Reitz most likely in violation with the CFA Institute Standards of Professional
Conduct?
A. Yes.
B. No, because he is assisting his firm in following best practice with respect
to CFA Institute performance presentation standards.
C. No, because he is using his volunteer position to benefit the investment
community in general.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 1, Reading 2.
4. With respect to the marketing material that Mooney designed, which of the above
points is most likely in violation of the CFA Institute Standards of Professional
Conduct?
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 1, Reading 2.
Point 1 is in violation since one cannot cite an expected completion date of any
level of the CFA Program. Point 2 is in violation because one cannot alter the
designation to create new words or phrases. Point 3 is not in violation, since
members and candidates are not prevented from highlighting the thoroughness
and rigor of the CFA Program, or its commitment to ethical and professional
conduct.
5. Are Singer and Deale most likely in violation of the CFA Institute Standards of
Professional Conduct?
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 1, Reading 2.
Deale is not in violation. Deale is free to cite the CFA designation either before or
after listing his PhD.
6. To avoid the conflict of interest arising due to her personal portfolio composition,
Levine should least likely:
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 3.
By selling her investments and investing in a mutual fund, Levine can avoid
conflicts of interest arising due to her personal portfolio. By investing in a mutual
fund, she would share in a portfolio that would be much more diversified (thereby
removing materiality) and would also not be a party in any investment decision-
making. However, establishing a blind trust is not exactly appropriate as an
avoidance measure. In this case, although Levine would not know the exact nature
of future transactions in her portfolio, she could reasonably anticipate their
general direction because of the account policies and guidelines. In any event, she
could still be perceived as having a conflict, which would require that she disclose
it to her clients.
In addition to the above information, Green also reviewed the firm’s methods of
determining end-of-period valuations and returns for portfolio assets. Green evaluated the
valuation procedures for their private wealth funds managed as separate accounts, as well
for the pooled institutional funds. He found out that GEM hires competent and qualified
managers for the management of their private wealth funds, who perform thorough
analysis and due diligence before making recommendations. In addition, the managers
use widely accepted valuation methods to appraise portfolio holdings and apply them on
a consistent basis. GEM’s pooled accounts are supervised by a board of directors
consisting of the firm’s most senior and experienced portfolio managers. The board is
responsible for approving the asset valuation policies and procedures and reviewing
valuations.
As a part of his comprehensive analysis of the firm, Green held a meeting with Tavella to
discuss the firm’s disclosure policies. One of the disclosures related to costs made to
existing clients stated:
of the client relationship, in the investment policy statement. In addition, the incentive fee
will be recouped by investors if subsequent to the payment, the portfolio incurs losses.”
In addition, GEM also disclosed to each client the actual fees and other costs charged to
them, but did not disclose the itemizations of such charges.
As their discussion continued, Green found out that as part of their risk management
process, GEM hires an independent third-party to verify portfolio information provided to
clients. The confirmation of portfolio information is done for their pooled vehicles, and
takes the form of an audit performed by the third party verifier. Since such an audit is
carried out to help portfolio managers at GEM identify potential problems, and not for
their clients, GEM does not disclose to its clients the results of the audit. However, it does
regularly inform them about the dates of the review process, and how such a process
helps the managers at the firm identify problems as early as possible. GEM believes this
will enhance their credibility.
Statement 1: “GEM ensures that no client bears a financial loss by the misallocation of
transactions by any GEM’s employee. To ensure this, GEM credits short-
term interest to all accounts for which shares were incorrectly allocated,
and removes short-term interest from those accounts that should have
received shares and in which shares are put on a back-dated basis.”
7. Are the procedures at Growth Equity Management in accordance with the Asset
Manager Code of Professional Conduct?
A. Yes.
B. Only procedure 1 is in accordance with the Code.
C. None of the procedures are in accordance with the Code.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 4.
The procedures are in accordance with the Code. The Code does not preclude
managers from maintaining multiple business relationships with a client as long as
the conflicts of interest are disclosed. Also, Managers are required to develop
policies and processes designed to ensure that client transactions take precedence
over employee or firm transactions. This can be done through several methods,
one of which is the creation of a restricted list. Managers could require employees
to provide compliance officers with trade confirmations each quarter (but it is not
a must). In addition, Managers may designate an existing employee to serve as the
compliance officer with complete authority. Not all firms need entire compliance
departments (it depends on the size of the firm, the complexity of products etc.).
A. No.
B. Only with respect to the private wealth accounts.
C. Only with respect to the pooled accounts.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 4.
GEM is not in accordance with the Code with respect to asset valuation
procedures. In case of private wealth funds, the portfolio managers are themselves
responsible for determining end-of-period valuations and returns for portfolio
assets. This gives rise to a conflict of interest since most managers are paid an
additional fee calculated as a percent of the annual returns earned on the assets.
An independent third party should perform such valuations.
In case of the pooled accounts, the board of directors is not independent; they are
portfolio managers at the firm. Hence, the function of the board should be
undertaken by an independent third party. If the board were composed of
independent members, then they could take on such a responsibility.
9. Is GEM’s disclosure related to costs most likely in accordance with the Asset
Manager Code of Professional Conduct?
A. Yes.
B. No, because it does not disclose the itemizations of fees and costs.
C. No, because it did not disclose the average or expected expenses or
fees clients are likely to incur.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 4.
10. Is GEM’s policy regarding the audit of their pooled accounts most likely in
accordance with the Asset Manager Code of Professional Conduct?
A. Yes.
B. No, because GEM will need to seek approval of the particular clients
whose funds are submitted for the audit, prior to the start of such a
process.
C. No, because GEM’s disclosure policy regarding the audit is
inadequate.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 4.
If a Manager submits its funds or accounts for an annual review or audit, it must
disclose the results to clients. Such disclosure enables clients to hold Managers
accountable and alerts them to any potential problems.
11. Which of Tavella’s statements is most likely in accordance with CFA Institute
Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct?
A. Statement 1 only.
B. Statement 2 only.
C. Neither Statement 1 nor statement 2.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Sessions 1 and 2, Readings 2 and 4.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 1, Reading 2.
Patrick Campbell has just been hired as a consultant by Walter Investment Firm (WIF),
an asset management firm in operation for seven years. In order to gain a competitive
advantage in its industry, in March 2010, the firm came into compliance with the Global
Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). WIF believes that being GIPS compliant will
increase their clients’ confidence in their investment performance results and will provide
them with an increased ability to compete in foreign markets. The CEO at WIF,
Christopher Carter, hired Campbell to analyze their investment reporting and calculation
methodologies, and to identify any errors that would prevent their compliance with the
GIPS. As part of his evaluation process, Campbell talked to Carter to gather some
information. Carter shared the following information:
• WIF values portfolios on the date of all large external cash flows, and uses an
internally determined criterion to define ‘large’. Although this criterion requires
judgment and hence, is not documented, it is applied consistently from one period to
the next. WIF values composites every year using calendar year-end valuation dates.
The composite returns are calculated by asset-weighting the individual portfolio
returns.
• The Growth Equity Composite includes two portfolios that have an objective of
earning a 2% excess return relative to a growth equity index fund including domestic
U.S. stocks. Both portfolios are managed using a semi-active management approach.
Exhibits 1 and 2 display information about the two portfolios.
Exhibit 1
Portfolio A
Market Value After
Date Market Value ($) Cash Flow ($)
Cash Flow ($)
05/31/09 495,000
06/13/09 550,000 135,000
06/22/09 715,000
06/30/09 867,000
Exhibit 2
Portfolio B
Market Value After
Date Market Value ($) Cash Flow ($)
Cash Flow ($)
05/31/09 730,400
06/13/09 789,304
06/22/09 883,000 $65,000
06/30/09 1,450,394
• The firm’s Market Oriented Composite invests in stocks that have P/BV and P/E
ratios equal to those of an average stock in the market. The composite includes a
number of portfolios, including both fee-paying and non-fee paying discretionary
portfolios. Some of the portfolios included in the composite are also part of other
composites offered by the firm. WIF makes no disclosure related to the non-fee
paying portfolios but they are subject to the same rules as fee-paying portfolios.
• WIF also offers real estate and private equity investment vehicles to its clients. WIF
has invested a pension fund in direct real estate, and values this investment at market
value at least quarterly. In addition, when a presentation about the investment’s
returns is made to the board of the pension fund, WIF discloses the income and
capital appreciation component returns in addition to the total return, for the portfolio
investment, but not for the benchmark.
Exhibit 3
WIF’s Closed-End Fund Composite Transactions
Quarter
Additional investment 2 -$1,000,000
Cash distribution 4 $650,000
Cash distribution 7 $490,000
Ending value 8 $4,200,000
In the real estate composite’s prospectus WIF has presented the composite’s since
inception internal rate of return (SI-IRR) calculated in accordance with the GIPS
provisions. The SI-IRR of the composite’s benchmark is quoted to investors on request.
The vintage year of the fund has been identified as 2009 in the fund’s prospectus.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 6.
WIF’s calculation methodologies are not in accordance with the GIPS. For
periods beginning January 1, 2010, firms must value portfolios on the date of all
large external cash flows. External cash flows must be treated in a consistent
manner within the firm’s documented composite specific policy. Whatever limits
are established by WIF to explain ‘large’, it should be documented. For periods
beginning January 1, 2010, firms must value composites at least monthly, with
composite returns calculated by asset weighting the individual portfolio returns.
14. The Growth Equity Composite return for the month of June based on the
beginning assets plus weighted cash flows method using the modified Dietz
method is closest to:
A. 45.39%.
B. 67.61%.
C. 53.20%.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 6.
Composite return using the beginning assets plus weighted cash flows method:
15. With respect to the Market Oriented Composite, is WIF most likely in accordance
with GIPS?
A. Yes.
B. No, because GIPS do not permit firms to include a portfolio in more than
one composite.
C. No, because the treatment of non-fee paying portfolios is not GIPS
compliant.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 6.
Firms are permitted to include a portfolio in more than one composite, provided it
satisfies the definition of each composite. However, if WIF includes non-fee
paying portfolios in the composite, the portfolios should be subject to the same
rules as fee-paying portfolios. WIF is also required to disclose the exact
percentage of composite assets represented by the non-fee paying portfolios.
16. Is the treatment of the pension fund’s investment in direct real estate most likely
GIPS compliant?
A. Yes.
B. No, because real estate investments must be valued at market value at least
once every month.
C. No, because the income and capital appreciation components must also be
disclosed for the benchmark.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 6.
The treatment is GIPS compliant. For periods beginning January 1, 2008, real
estate investments must be valued at least quarterly. Also, GIPS only recommends
the disclosure of income, capital and total returns for the benchmark.
17. Using Exhibit 3, the SI-IRR for the WIF real estate composite over the
measurement period, which is in accordance with the GIPS standards, is closest
to:
A. 6.4%.
B. 13.4%.
C. 28.1%.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 6.
The SI-IRR is calculated using the IRR function keys (see below):
CF0 = - $2,500,000
C01 = 0
C02 = - $1,000,000
C03 = 0
C04 = $650,000
C05 = 0
C06 = 0
C07 = $490,000
C08 = 4,200,000
6.1395% is the quarterly IRR. The GIPS real estate provisions require us to
annualize the SI-IRR. The annualized SI-IRR is 28.12%.
18. Is WIF in compliance with the GIPS standards with respect to the details included
in the fund’s prospectus?
A. Yes.
B. Only with respect to the vintage year.
C. Only with respect to presenting the composite’s SI-IRR.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 1, Study Session 2, Reading 6.
WIF is in compliance with the GIPS standards with respect to the vintage year of
the composite. The GIPS provisions require firms to disclose the vintage year of
closed end fund composite and how the vintage year is defined. The GIPS
glossary defines two methods for determining the vintage year: 1) The year of the
fund’s first capital call from its investors and 2) the year when the first committed
capital from outside investors is closed and legally binding. Given that December
30, 2009 is the first date on which capital is first called from investors and the
committed capital is closed and legally binding, the vintage year is defined as
2009.
WIGF has violated the GIPS standards by not presenting the SI-IRR of the
composite’s benchmark.
Bill Coss is head of the trading division at High-Rise Investment Management (HRIM), a
reputable Canadian asset management firm. Bill supervises more than twenty financial
experts at his department. During his recent manager performance evaluation, Bill
observes the following behavior of one of his managers named Philips Lomas.
“Philips examines historical charts of companies’ share prices to identify trends. Though
he observes data from a larger time-series but often wrongly extrapolate recent
performance of the stocks”.
Bill’s half-sister Christine Mills works in a commercial bank and is invited by High-Rise
Investment Management to deliver a lecture on ‘Portfolio Management Process from the
perspective of Banks”.
She defines bank as a financial intermediary that take deposits and make loans. Her
presentation comprises of three parts.
As banks are highly sensitive to changes in interest rates, therefore banks tend to reduce
asset-liability mismatches. She explains in detail the relation among asset-liability
mismatch, size of the bank and interest rate shock.
A junior analyst asks the following question, “If a bank’s liabilities duration is greater
than the bank’s asset duration, how positive interest rate shock affect the market value of
bank’s net worth?”
At the end of the session Daniel, a portfolio manager at HRIM inquired about the primary
return objective of a bank’s securities portfolio.
19. Philips’s portfolio would most likely indicate which behavioral bias?
A. Framing bias
B. Availability bias
C. Representativeness
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
Level III, Volume 2, Study Session 4, Reading 8.
Correct Answer: B
B is correct. People who suffer from representativeness bias (by looking for
similar patterns in new information or extrapolating the recent trends) often find it
difficult to deal with complex information.
Reference:
Level III, Volume 2, Study Session 3, Reading 8.
21. With respect to Part 1 ‘Investment Strategy and Risk Measures’, the most suitable
response of the junior analyst’s question is that as a result of positive interest
shock, the bank’s net worth will:
A. increase
B. decrease
C. remain unchanged.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 5, Study Session 14, Reading 33.
A. correct.
B. incorrect.
C. incorrect about c only.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 2, Study Session 14, Reading 33.
23. With regards to Part 3 ‘Tax Concerns and Legal & Regulatory Factors, Christine
is most likely:
A. correct.
B. incorrect about ‘Tax concerns’ only.
C. incorrect about ‘Legal and regulatory factors only.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 5, Study Session 14, Reading 33.
C is correct. Banks are heavily regulated and are required to comply with all the
state and federal banking regulations.
Banks’ securities portfolios are fully taxable therefore they evaluate performance
of taxable and tax-exempt investments on an after-tax basis to maximize their
after-tax returns.
24. Which of the following is least likely the return objective of a bank’s securities
portfolio?
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 5, Study Session 14, Reading 33.
The return objective of a bank can be divided into one of three categories:
• To earn or maintain positive interest rate spread
• To maintain substantial liquidity
• To maximize return earned on excess cash or residual holdings
Gonzales has instructed Solanki to allocate equities to clients’ portfolios. Based on AF’s
risk tolerance, Solanki adopts a passive exposure to equity market and benchmarks the
equity allocation to S&P 500 equity index.
Gonzales then asks Solanki about the various approaches to create index tracking equity
portfolio. Solanki describes the following two approaches.
Approach 1:
One approach is full replication and I would like to share with you two important facts
about this approach.
Fact 1: Full replication is easy to comprehend; however, index must have constituents
that are readily available for trading.
Fact 2: To construct a portfolio using this approach, we need data such as the constituent
stocks, their relevant identifiers, shares outstanding and price.
Approach 2:
Another way to track an index using only a subset of stocks is to divide the index along
multiple dimensions, creating groups. Each stock is then placed into the group that best
describes it. Finally, a manager can select a number of stocks from each group, ensuring
that the selected stocks have a market capitalization equal to the total market
capitalization of all the stocks in that group.
Gonzales then adds that I’m not in favor of full replication or blended approach so let’s
select between sampling or optimization. Can you differentiate optimization approach
from stratified sampling?
Solanki replies:
“If lowering the amount of portfolio’s tracking error is the prime objective, then
optimization is preferable over stratified sampling. However, if we construct a portfolio
using optimization approach, it is likely that our portfolio includes securities from
different sectors whose returns are strongly correlated.”
Gonzales discusses with Solanki the sources of income as well as the various costs
associated with equity portfolios. Gonzales is particularly interested about enhancing
portfolio return through stock lending.
With regards to the advantages of Security lending, Solanki told Gonzales the following:
Advantage 1: Stock loans are collateralized with either cash or other high-quality
securities therefore stock lending transaction provide complete financial
protection to the lenders.
25. Which of the following reasons explain why Gonzales has been motivated to
consider equities in the firm’s asset allocation? For:
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 9, Reading 23.
B is incorrect. Corporate income taxes and capital gains taxes are typically not
inflation indexed, so inflation can cut into after-tax real returns unless share prices
fully reflect the interaction of inflation and taxation.
A. correct.
B. incorrect about fact 1.
C. incorrect about fact 2.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 9, Reading 23.
A. optimization.
B. blended approach.
C. stratified sampling.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 9, Reading 23.
A. Yes.
B. No, he is incorrect about dividing the stocks along multiple dimensions.
C. No, he is incorrect about the fact that the selected stocks’ market
capitalization is equal to the total market capitalization of all the stocks in
that group.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 9, Reading 23.
He is incorrect about the fact that the selected stocks’ market capitalization is
equal to the total market capitalization of all the stocks in that group.
29. With regards to Gonzales question about the difference between optimization and
stratified sampling, Solanki’s reply is most likely:
A. correct.
B. incorrect because optimization approach takes into account covariances
among portfolio constituents.
C. incorrect because stratified sampling is preferable over optimization, if
lowering the amount of portfolio’s tracking error is the prime objective.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 9, Reading 23.
30. With regards to the advantages of security lending, Solanki is most likely correct
about advantage:
A. 3 only.
B. 1 and 2 only.
C. 1 and 3 only.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 9, Reading 23.
Stock loans are collateralized with either cash or other high-quality securities to
provide some financial protection to the lenders. However, as with any other
investment, collateral would be subject to market risk, liquidity risk, operational
risk, liquidity risk.
There is administrative cost involved in the security lending program that can
reduce the collateral income generated.
Jimmy Pickens works at SkyLine Capital Specialists (SLCS), an investment firm in the
U.S. established by a group of experienced financial analysts and investment
professionals. Pickens is a senior portfolio manager at the firm who heads a team of more
than ten fixed income analysts. During his lunch break, Pickens was called by David
Pressman, a fixed income manager at SLCS. Pressman wanted help in analyzing the
immunization of a single liability that was due in fifteen years. He had short-listed three
bond portfolios composed of coupon-bearing government bonds for this purpose, with the
objective of minimizing structural risk over the investment horizon. Exhibit 1 displays the
risk and return characteristics of the three portfolios.
Exhibit 1: Immunization Portfolios Risk and Return (based on aggregation of bond cash
flows)
After Pickens assisted Pressman with his calculations, he talked about how single and
multiple liabilities could be immunized to lock in a guaranteed rate of return over a
particular time horizon. When talking about multiple liability immunization, Pickens
made the following comment:
Statement 1: “To assure multiple liability immunization in the case of parallel rate
shifts, managers selecting securities to be included in the portfolio must
not only keep track of the matching of money duration between assets and
liabilities but also maintain a specified distribution for assets in the
portfolio.”
Pickens then talked about the various methods of immunizing multiple liabilities. He
made the following comment:
Statement 2: “Perfect cash flow matching is less risky than horizon matching which in
turn is less risky than multiple liability immunization. However, cash flow
matching is the most costly to implement, whereas multiple liability
immunization is the least.”
In addition to the liability due in fifteen years, Pressman was also held in charge of
devising an effective strategy that would pay off the debt liabilities of Stone-Wash
Corporation (SWC), one of SLCS’s institutional clients. The market value of the portfolio
of multiple liabilities equaled 23.56 billion with a modified duration of 7.54, convexity of
69.13 and BPV of $12.36 million respectively. During a meeting with SWC’s board of
directors, Pressman suggested three different portfolios to pay off the debt. The portfolios
consisted of investment grade corporate bonds with maturities ranging from 5 to 12
years. The market value of all three portfolios was deemed sufficient to cover the
liabilities. Exhibit 2 displays key characteristics of the three portfolios.
Pickens is also managing a fixed income portfolio for Ryan Wicker, a chemical engineer
working for Triple-E Chemicals (TEC) in USA. The portfolio is worth $3 million, and
Wicker has instructed Pickens to use a long-term bond index as a benchmark for his
portfolio. The index includes long-term corporate bonds, long-term government bonds,
and long-term callable issues. To match the portfolio’s risk factors with those of the
benchmark, Pickens is using a multifactor model technique to identify the set of factors
that drive the index’s returns. Two of the risk factors that Pickens has identified are the
spread duration and the sector duration. To ensure that the indexed portfolio closely
tracks the benchmark with regards to these risk factors, Pickens matched the percentage
weight in the various sectors and qualities of the benchmark index. Also, since Pickens
knows that duration only captures the effect of small interest rate changes, he not only
matched the duration, but also the convexity of the index, especially to replicate the
index’s exposure to call risk.
31. Which of the following portfolios should Pickens most likely recommend to
Pressman for immunizing the liability due in 15 years?
A. Portfolio A.
B. Portfolio B.
C. Portfolio C.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 7, Reading 19.
Although the cash flow yield is higher for Portfolio A relative to Portfolio B, and
the duration is closer to the horizon for the liability, Portfolio A would still not be
the best option. This is because, first, the difference between the yields (and
duration) is very minimal. Second, since the objective is to minimize structural
risk, the most appropriate portfolio would be the one with the lowest convexity
(even though higher convexity is a desirable property). This would ensure that the
dispersion of cash flows is minimized. Hence, Portfolio B would be the most
appropriate choice (Portfolio C has the highest convexity and would be least
appropriate).
A. Statement 1 only.
B. Statement 2 only.
C. both statements 1 and 2.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 7, Reading 19.
• The money duration of the portfolio must equal the money duration of the
liabilities.
• The distribution of durations of individual portfolio assets must have a wider
range than the distribution of the liabilities.
Statement 2 is correct. Cash flow matching (if perfectly matched) will have no
reinvestment risk and hence, will be the least risky strategy. Horizonmatching
involves cash flow matching in the first few years so it is less risky than multiple
liability immunization. However, cash flow matching is the costliest to implement
and multiple liability immunization is the least, with horizon matching in
between.
33. The most appropriate portfolio to carry out an effective duration matching strategy
for paying off SWC’s liabilities would be:
A. Portfolio A.
B. Portfolio B.
C. Portfolio C.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 7, Reading 19.
Portfolio C’s BPV is considerably higher than the desired BPV. Given that its
modified duration is also higher, it does not seem like a good option. Even though
Portfolio A’s duration and BPV are very close to those of the liabilities, a key
condition for immunization of multiple liabilities is that the convexity of the
assets needs to be greater than the liabilities. Portfolio A does not meet that
criterion. Hence, Portfolio B is the best choice.
34. With regards to his attempts to match the risk factors of Ryan Wicker’s bond
portfolio to those of the benchmark, Pickens is most accurate with respect to the
matching of the:
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 7, Reading 19.
In order to match the spread duration of the benchmark index, Pickens should
match the amount of the index duration that comes from the various quality
categories. Matching just the percentage weights of the qualities will not ensure
that the portfolio and the benchmark have the same spread duration contributions
of the various qualities.
Similarly, simply matching the weights of the various sectors of the benchmark
index is not enough to ensure that the portfolio and benchmark have the same
sector durations; Pickens needs to match the amount of the index duration that
comes from the various sectors (sector duration contributions).
To match the index’s exposure to call risk, Pickens attempted to match the
convexity of the index; however, this is rarely attempted because to stay matched
can lead to excessively high transaction costs. A feasible method would be to
match the sector, coupon, and maturity weights of the callable sectors.
35. Which of the following is closest to the number of contracts that Pickens needs to
transact in to close the duration gap of the government bond portfolio and the
corporate debt liabilities?
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 7, Reading 19.
36. Given Pressman’s expectations about the future course of market interest rates,
the best hedging strategy given contingent immunization would involve:
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 7, Reading 19.
Given that rates are expected to fall, the manager should over-hedge because
futures prices rise as rates go down. This would further increase the surplus and
reduce the cost of retiring the debt liabilities (if predictions are correct).
Statement 1: “The position can lose 80% of its maximum profit because only 20% has
been hedged .”
Statement 2: “Between the two option strike prices, the exercise value of the spread will
rise steadily as the underlying price increases.”
One of Price’s clients has implemented a bear put spread. When asked about the
outcomes of the strategy, Price mentioned that such a strategy would earn a maximum
profit if both puts expire in the money. He also said that the breakeven price is such that
leaves one put in the money and the other out of money.
A. statement 1 only.
B. statement 2 only.
C. neither statement 1 nor statement 2.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 6, Reading 15.
Statement 1 is incorrect. Out of the total $18 [($65 - $55) + $15 – $7] bull call
position, only
$8 ($15 – $7) is hedged or 44.44% ($8/$18). This means that the position can still
lose 55.56% of its maximum profit.
Statement 2 is correct. Between the two strike prices of $65 and $55, for every unit
increase up to the higher strike price, the exercise value of this spread steadily
increases by 1.
38. If at expiration of the calls the price of the underlying is $62, the profit to Price’s
client will be closest to:
A. $7.
B. – $1.
C. $15.
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 6, Reading 15.
39. For the position Price took, the maximum profit and maximum loss is closest to:
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 6, Reading 15.
40. For the position Price took, the breakeven stock price at expiration is closest to:
A. $47.
B. $77.
C. $63.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 6, Reading 15.
41. Is Price most likely accurate about the maximum profit and breakeven price of a
bear put spread?
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 6, Reading 15.
The maximum profit for a bear put spread occurs when both the puts (the long put
and the short put) are in the money. The breakeven price falls between the exercise
prices of the two puts, so that one is in the money and the other is out of money.
A. Bull spreads with American puts are riskier compared to those with
European puts.
B. The worst outcome for a bear put spread occurs when the stock price is
less than the exercise price of the short put.
C. The maximum a bull call spread can gain is the difference between the
exercise prices of the short call and the long call.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 6, Reading 15.
A bull spread position with American puts is riskier compared to one with European
puts because the short put could be exercised early when the long put is not in the
money. The other two options are incorrect. The worst outcome for a bear put spread
occurs when the underlying’s price is greater than the exercise price of the long put
(and the options expire out of money). The maximum a bull call spread can gain is the
difference between the exercise price of the short call and the long call less the initial
cash outlay.
Brian Riley is a manager at BR Fund of Funds (FoF) based in Washington, D.C. The FoF
is currently using Equity Market Neutral (EMN), Event Driven and Specialist strategies.
EMN manager is in discussion with his assistant, who is a CFA level III student,
regarding the characteristics of Equity Market Neutral strategy of managing hedge funds.
The manager made the following statements:
Statement 2: High liquidity makes EMN strategy suitable for liquid alternatives as well
as limited partnership hedge funds.
Statement 3: Market neutral portfolios can be up to 300% long vs. 300% short
Event driven (ED) strategy manager is currently evaluating two investments. First is a
merger arbitrage opportunity involving a friendly takeover of Texel Limited by Aspire
Corporation Limited. Aspire has offered to acquire Texel with stock for stock acquisition
method. Share prices are $50 and $20 for Aspire and Texel respectively. Aspire would
trade 1 share of its own with 2 shares of Texel. Shortly after announcement, the share
price of Aspire fell to $45 and Texel’s share price has risen to $23. The ED manager
plans to buy 15000 shares to Texel and short sell 7500 shares of Aspire.
Second: the manager had invested in Scott Company’s equity which was going through
reorganization 8 months ago and became a majority shareholder. He now expects that the
company will shortly go into liquidation, based on its deteriorating financial situation.
Shareholders will be entitled to a minimum amount, if any, in case of liquidation. The
manager wants to earn return on this opportunity and considering possible alternatives.
The special strategy (SS) manager plans to invest in life settlement policy being sold by a
broker after evaluation. Details of the policy are listed below:
The FoF is measuring its performance for the last quarter and the returns generated by
EMN, ED and SS funds are 20%, (5%) and 15% respectively.
FoF charges 1% management fee and 10% incentive fee while individual funds charge
1% management fee and 20% incentive fee.
43. Which of the following statements made by the EMN manager is most likely
correct?
A. Statement 1
B. Statement 2
C. Statement 3
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
44. Which of the following statements about macro-oriented market neutral manager
is most likely correct?
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
45. Using the information provided about the acquisition, calculate how much
incremental benefit the manager could have earned, if he had used soft catalyst
event driven approach?
A. $84,600
B. $79,800
C. $82,500
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
If he had taken the position in anticipation of acquisition offer, the prices would not
have been reflected the potential acquisition. Incremental benefit could have been
(23-20)*15000 + (50-45)*7500 = $82,500
46. Which of the following alternative approaches the ED manager is most likely to
implement?
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
Selling equity will deteriorate the market price further before the manager could close
its position because of majority shareholding. Short selling will have the same impact.
Options will generate return on equity and debt, both.
47. Based on exhibit 1, the present value of future expected benefit is approximately
equal to?
A. $1.7 million
B. $1.1 million
C. $1.5 million
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
Calculate PV: N=84 (7*12), PMT= 12,500, I/Y=1.667% (20/12), FV=$3 million
CPT à PV
PV= $1,679,445
48. Which of the following statements about life settlement policy is least likely
correct?
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
49. Given equal distribution of funds, the FoF’s net of fee return is approximately
equal to?
A. 4.99%
B. 5.22%
C. 4.76%
Correct Answer:
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 4, Study Session 11, Reading 26.
Victor Solanki is the manager of a fixed-income fund comprising domestic corporate and
government-issued debt as well as US equities indexed to the S&P500. The fund is
valued at a total of $30 million. The allocation to fixed income is 60% and is further
divided as 60% domestic corporate bonds and 40% government-issued bonds.
Solanki would like to increase the corporate bond allocation by 10% using bond futures
contracts and decrease the government bond allocation by the same amount using another
set of futures contracts. The corporate bond allocation has a modified duration of 4.5.
Solanki has summarized relevant data pertaining to bond futures in Exhibit 1 below.
Exhibit 1:
Data Relevant to Bond Futures
Futures contract beta 1
Multiplier $125
Contract size $150,000
Cheapest-to-deliver (CTD) bond price $118
CTD modified duration 7.77
Conversion factor 0.89751
BPVCTD 137.5290
Solanki fears that the implied volatility of the S&P 500 index will increase and would
like to protect the firm’s equity position against tail risk. He is contemplating employing
two alternative strategies:
Strategy 2: Establish a long position in a 3-month variance swap on the S&P 500 index
with a vega notional of $10 million and a (unannualized) strike of 35%. The
annual interest rate is 1.20%.
While explaining Strategy 1 to his subordinate Mary Graham, Solanki states, “This
strategy can yield an additional return for my investment portfolio if the VIX futures
curve remains in backwardation and volatility expectations remain unchanged as the
front-month futures contract approaches expiration.”
Mary then illustrates the following various factors that cause continuous change in the
shape of the VIX futures curve.
51. Increasing the corporate bond allocation will require Solanki to:
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 3, Study Session 6, Reading 16.
A is correct. Solanki will need to buy 4 bond futures contracts to increase the
corporate bond allocation by 10%.
The current corporate bond allocation is $10.80 million ($30 million × 60% × 60%).
Solanki would like to increase the corporate bond allocation to $11.88 million ($10.8
million × 110%), an increase of $1.08 million. The target basis point value BPVT is
calculated below:
BPVCTD is 137.5290 and the conversion factor is 0.89751. Solanki will convert cash
into corporate bonds, so the BPVP is 0. BPVHR = [(BPVT – BPVP)/BPVCTD] × CF =
(486 – 0/137.529) × 0.89751 = 3.1716 or approximately 3 contracts.
52. Based solely on the information provided in Strategy 1, the VIX futures curve
appears to be in a state of:
A. stability.
B. contango.
C. backwardation.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 3, Study Session 6, Reading 16.
C is correct. The VIX futures curve is in a state of backwardation as the VIX futures
contracts demonstrate a decrease in price with maturity.
53. Solanki is advised by one of his colleagues to consider a direct investment in the
VIX to maximize hedging benefits. Is the colleague’s advice a plausible
investment strategy?
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 3, Study Session 6, Reading 16.
54. Solanki’s statement to his colleague regarding the additional yield generated by
the strategy is:
A. correct.
B. incorrect, the strategy will generate rolling costs.
C. incorrect, the strategy will generate negative roll returns.
Correct Answer: A
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 3, Study Session 6, Reading 16.
A is correct. Assuming that volatility expectations remain constant, when the VIX
futures curve is in backwardation, the VIX futures price will get pulled closer the VIX
spot price and they will increase in price as they approach expiration. Therefore,
Solanki can expect to generate roll-down profits as a result of his long VIX futures
position.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 3, Study Session 6, Reading 16.
C is correct. If Solanki purchases the swap, he would have purchased $10 million
vega notional of a 3-month variance swap on the S&P500 index with a volatility
strike of 35%. The value of the swap at expiry is calculated as follows:
Since the payment amount is positive, the swap seller will pay the swap buyer,
Solanki, $53.57 million to settle the swap.
56. Which of the Mary’s illustrated factors regarding always changing shape of the
VIX futures is/are correct?
A. ii) is correct.
B. ii) and iii) are correct.
C. All three are correct.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 3, Study Session 6, Reading 16.
C is correct. All the factors stated by Mary reflect changes in the shape of the VIX
futures curve.
Gerard Asset Managers (GAM) is a medium sized firm which has been in the asset
management business for only twelve months. The firm’s clients include both individual
and institutional clients. The clients are roughly divided between the two types.
The firm has no formal performance evaluation process but would like to develop one in
the near future. Its’ largest institutional client is particularly keen on analyzing the
performances of the investment managers and asset categories it employs.
Apart from the institutional client, senior investment manager, Carl Lester, would like to
install a formal system such that investment managers can analyze their individual
performances independently. He believes such a system will allow the managers to
improve upon their performances. However, he is not sure of what process the
institutional client and investment managers can use for evaluating the performances of
their interest.
Doug Richards, CFA is another investment manager who has been recently employed by
GAM. He has proposed a method to Lester, which involves presenting benchmark and
portfolio economic sector holdings as well as their respective benchmark and portfolio
returns. Richards has provided a sample of this method below based on actual client data
for illustration purposes.
57. The performance evaluation method which is most appropriate for the institutional
client and the investment managers is:
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 6, Study Session 15, Reading 36.
Macro attribution analysis is conducted by the fund sponsor who wishes to assess the
effectiveness of the investment managers it deploys. Thus, such an analysis can be
used to assess the performances of the allocations to asset categories and investment
managers. Macro attribution analysis will prove useful for the institutional client.
58. The interaction return for the Technology sector can be attributed to:
A. holding portfolio stocks, whose aggregate performance was lower than the
aggregate performance of the stocks in the sector benchmark.
B. overweighting a sector in the portfolio, which has outperformed its
corresponding benchmark sector.
C. overweighing a sector in the portfolio, which has underperformed its
corresponding benchmark sector.
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 6, Study Session 15, Reading 36.
The Interaction return for the Technology sector is attributable to overweighting the
sector in the portfolio by 15.00% (45.00 – 30.00%) while the sector in portfolio has
underperformed the corresponding technology sector in the benchmark by 1.53%
(2.23 – 3.76%).
59. The Sector Allocation effect return for the Financial Sector can be attributed to:
Correct Answer: B
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 6, Study Session 15, Reading 36.
The Sector allocation effect return for the financial sector can be attributable to
underweighting the sector, which has performed poorly relative to the overall
benchmark.
The return on the overall benchmark is 1.65% and the benchmark return for the
financial sector is - 4.00%. The decision to underweight the sector by 10.00% (50.00
– 60.00%) which underperformed relative to the overall benchmark resulted in a
positive contribution to the portfolio.
60. The Sector Selection effect return for the Healthcare sector can be attributed to:
Correct Answer: C
Reference:
CFA Level III, Volume 6, Study Session 15, Reading 36.
The Sector Selection return for the Healthcare sector can be attributed to holding
portfolio stocks, whose aggregate performance was higher than the aggregate
performance of the stocks in the sector benchmark.
The return of the portfolio’s healthcare sector is 2.21% while the return for the
benchmark’s healthcare sector is 1.89%. A positive return contribution of 0.32%
(2.21 – 1.89%) implies that the healthcare stocks held in the portfolio outperformed
the healthcare stocks held in the benchmark.