Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 63 views

    Title:: Aim and Objective

    Uploaded by

    sakshi singh
    This document outlines a research project comparing plea bargaining systems in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The project aims to analyze differences in how plea bargaining is conceptualized in each country, as well as the roles of prosecutors, courts, and defendants. It will use a doctrinal research methodology, reviewing primary sources like criminal codes and secondary sources like reports and articles. The introduction provides background on plea bargaining and its recent introduction to the Indian legal system through criminal law amendments. Key chapters will cover plea bargaining procedures in each country and conduct a comparative analysis and conclusion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Title:: Aim and Objective

    Uploaded by

    sakshi singh
    63 views3 pages
    This document outlines a research project comparing plea bargaining systems in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The project aims to analyze differences in how plea bargaining is conceptualized in each country, as well as the roles of prosecutors, courts, and defendants. It will use a doctrinal research methodology, reviewing primary sources like criminal codes and secondary sources like reports and articles. The introduction provides background on plea bargaining and its recent introduction to the Indian legal system through criminal law amendments. Key chapters will cover plea bargaining procedures in each country and conduct a comparative analysis and conclusion.

    Original Title

    crpc synopsis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines a research project comparing plea bargaining systems in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The project aims to analyze differences in how plea bargaining is conceptualized in each country, as well as the roles of prosecutors, courts, and defendants. It will use a doctrinal research methodology, reviewing primary sources like criminal codes and secondary sources like reports and articles. The introduction provides background on plea bargaining and its recent introduction to the Indian legal system through criminal law amendments. Key chapters will cover plea bargaining procedures in each country and conduct a comparative analysis and conclusion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    63 views3 pages

    Title:: Aim and Objective

    Uploaded by

    sakshi singh
    This document outlines a research project comparing plea bargaining systems in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The project aims to analyze differences in how plea bargaining is conceptualized in each country, as well as the roles of prosecutors, courts, and defendants. It will use a doctrinal research methodology, reviewing primary sources like criminal codes and secondary sources like reports and articles. The introduction provides background on plea bargaining and its recent introduction to the Indian legal system through criminal law amendments. Key chapters will cover plea bargaining procedures in each country and conduct a comparative analysis and conclusion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    TITLE:

    Title of the project is “COPARATIVE STUDY CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF PLEA


    BARGAINING IN INDIA, U.S.A. AND U.K.”.

    AIM AND OBJECTIVE:


    The paper aims to draw a comparative analysis of the concept of Plea Bargaining put in place in
    different Criminal Justice Systems. It further analyses the procedure of the same in different
    countries and the role of the prosecutors, courts and the defendant himself. The scope of the
    paper has been restricted to the comparative analysis of Plea bargaining in the countries of India,
    Unites States, United Kingdom to analyze the same.

    RESEARCH QUESTIONS:
    1. How concept of Plea bargaining is different in India, U.S.A and U.K.?
    2. What is the role of prosecutor, courts and the defendant in the criminal procedure of Plea
    Bargaining?

    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
    The method used for research purposes is entirely doctrinal. The data has been gathered by
    referring through various books of the given subject. Analysis of that particular data has been
    done by breaking the data into different sections and then drawing out conclusions from those
    different sections. The researcher has primarily relied upon the criminal codes of the respective
    countries and the criminal justice system therein. The researcher has also looked into the
    secondary sources of data such as reports by different commissions, articles and books by
    distinguished authors for the purpose of this paper.

    INTRODUCTION:
    The criminal justice system in India reveals that most of the under trial prisoners are languishing
    in prisons throughout the country. The accused inmates have to go through mental torture and
    have to pay considerable amount by the way of legal expenses. The courts have formulated an
    informal system of pre-trial bargaining in the western countries, prominent in the United States.
    In India the practice of plea bargaining was considered as immoral compromise in the criminal
    cases or trading out. The apex court also, was not in favor of introducing the concept of plea
    bargaining in India. The law commission of India in its 142nd, 154th and 177th advocated the
    introduction of plea bargaining in India. On the recommendation of the Malimath Committee,
    the Code of Criminal Procedure has been recently amended by the addition of Chapter XXIA,
    consisting of 12 sections (Sec 265-A to 265-L). 1 The report submitted by the committee also
    suggested that not only will the plea-bargaining expedite the disposal of the cases; but also result
    in sufficient compensation for the victim of the crime. The 154 th report of the Law Commission
    of India, suggested the addition of the chapter of ‘plea-bargaining’ in the Indian Criminal Justice
    system.

    The criminal law amendment Act, 2005 which was passed in the winter session of the
    parliament, introduced the concept of plea bargaining in India, which came into the effect on 5 th
    July, 2006.

    CHAPTERISATION (TENTATIVE):
     Introduction
     Plea bargaining in India
     Salient features of plea- bargaining in India
     Advantages and Disadvantages
     Plea bargaining in United Kingdom
     Plea bargaining in United States
     Comparative analysis & Conclusion
     Bibliography

    BIBIOGRAPHY (TENTATIVE) :
    PRIMARY SOURCES:
     Outline of Code of Criminal Procedure : Kelkar R.V.
     Code of Criminal Procedure : Ratanlal and Dherajlal.

    1
    SECONDARY SOURCES:
     www.manupatra.com
     www.westlaw.com
     www.sscrn.com
     www.ssc.com
     www.legalservices.com
     www.articlesbase.com

    You might also like