Hansen 169
Hansen 169
Hansen 169
This sounds very appealing, and, in all honesty, if you are a serious player
and have not yet considered these volumes, you must have a very eclectic
taste in openings or be very sure of your own capabilities.
Yet, as hinted above, there is some bad news, as related by Naiditsch in the
editorial preface:
"With the 9th 'Chess Evolution Janaury [sic] 2013' book, we are ending
our periodical series. We made 6 books in the Year 2011 and 3 books in
the Year 2012, trying to give You a way to stand even above the newest
theory and be able to surprise Your opponent at any chess level.
"To be honest, Etienne and me, we are quite sad about it. This is how
we started, investing a big amount of time and our chess knowledge to
make the Chess Evolution periodical as interesting as possible."
Sad news indeed, because the volumes that were released did in fact include a
lot of first class material and analysis. The language, as you can see from the
above preface, is understandable, but far from perfect English. There are
many editorial items that could have been improved upon; indeed, the name
of one of the contributors is spelled wrong on the cover of the present
volume.
Nevertheless, the pure chess quality of the material was amazing. Deep
analysis, many new ideas, original analysis and revisions of certain lines. All
really good stuff for the ambitious player who is trying to get the latest and
greatest material available.
Yet the end seemed inevitable, when you publish six volumes in the first year
and then only three in the second year. They were more ambitious initially
than their time allowed them to be and thus this happened. Also, the price for
each volume was rather steep; the list price of $44.95 makes it a very
expensive book, even after the discount offered by chess stores. Still, in
comparison with so many other things these days, it is manageable for those
who really want it. However, I am certain that it limited their readership a
great deal nonetheless.
To return to the chess aspect of things, with "only" approximately forty main
games per volume, spanning 350+ pages, you can easily picture that the
annotations cover all the relevant details, particularly with a focus on the
opening.
The material in this book is absolutely top notch and it is a shame that the
series will not continue. I hope the that grandmasters that ran this periodical
will have plenty of success in their future endeavors. In the meantime, let's
enjoy the work they have put together for us to study.
The material in this volume covers a wide amount of openings, many without
immediate relation to the Colle, especially in the latter chapters:
Let's look at an example of his writing. I will skip the annotations prior to
Black's thirteenth move, but needless to say they fill several pages:
[FEN "r4rk1/pbqn1ppp/1p1bp3/8/3P3R/
3B1N2/PP2QPPP/R1B3K1 b - - 0 14"]
14…g6
15 Bd2!
Tentatively, the meek bishop tiptoes forward just one square, as his
comrades yell their reassurances from the front line, encouraging him
forward.
15…Rac8 16 Qe3
16…Rfd8?
[FEN "2rr2k1/pbqn1p1p/1p1bp1p1/8/3P3R/
3BQN2/PP1B1PPP/R5K1 w - - 0 17"]
17 Bxg6!!
17…fxg6
18 Qxe6+ Kg7
Black's king puts aside reproaches and goes about the undiginified task
of running like the wind. Our work isn't finished.
Yes, it is silly, but it is also an awful lot of fun. If you are rated below 2000
and want to learn something about playing the Colle and get a repertoire
together as white, all while having some fun, then this book is it. However, if
you are looking for the ultimate work on all the lines for Black and White in
the Colle, you will want to look elsewhere.
Contributors (2 pages)
The Best Ten Games of the Preceding Volume (2 pages)
The Ten Most Important Theoretical Novelties of the Preceding Volume
(4 pages)
Garry's Choice (14 pages)
Old Wine in New Bottles (9 pages)
Top Three (15 pages)
One Country – Greece (17 pages)
Chess Informant Labs (8 surveys – 54 pages)
Rising Stars – GM Dariusz Swiercz (12 pages)
Guest Column "British Chess Magazine" (3 pages)
System of Signs (3 pages)
Games (158 pages)
Combinations (3 pages)
Excellent Moves (3 pages)
Endings (3 pages)
Problems (6 pages)
Studies (3 pages)
Tournaments (20 pages)
The Best of Chess Informant – GM Etienne Bacrot (11 pages)
Having been very pleasant above, I will now highlight a few things that can
be done better.
Let's begin with the grammatically incorrect title "The Best Ten Games of the
Preceding Volume." I know it has always been like this, but it should really
say "The Ten Best Games."
The annotations to the games in the "Top Three" section are typically very
thorough and interesting, and are often combined with some explanatory
prose. However, they seem to be copied and pasted from database software
without any further formatting. For instance, in the game Jakovenko-
Onischuk, after White's 19 b4 we have the following:
"The only serious move, but one which required exact calculation.
[Fortunately, I didn't have any choice; nothing at all is given by either 19.Nd6
Na5 20.Nc8 Rac8 or 19.Rc1 Bb7 20.Nc5 Bc5 21.Qc5 Qc5 22.Rc5 Rac8. So I
had to calculate.]"
The use of brackets is ugly and does not belong in an edited text. This also
occurs in several of the columns, including "CI Labs," "Rising Stars," and
"Old Wine." One can also criticize the grammar and the occasional odd
translations, though these can be tough to detect if English is not your first
language.
Placing the "System of Signs" in the middle of the book is just bizarre. The
same symbols are used from the very beginning of the book, just as the
opening classifications. So both should either be at the beginning or at the
very end of the book. Putting them in the middle makes very little sense.
In the main games section, more of the games should be annotated by the
players themselves. Though I understand that this is an expensive undertaking
and the top players may not have the required time to submit in-depth
annotations given the tournament schedules they have these days.
Also, the "Guest Column" from British Chess Magazine, seems more like a
regular feature than anything guest-like at this point.
That ends my criticism for the present volume. There are, of course, several
very interesting columns. Kasparov always finds an interesting game to
annotate, this time from his old favorite hunting grounds of the Najdorf
Sicilian in the lines of the English Attack. It is compelling reading and the
game is well-annotated. As are the supplemental games of his own, five in
total, also featuring the English Attack, including a loss against Short.
One example he covers in the article is the following from the Karpov-
Kortchnoi world championship match of 1978.
Karpov – Kortchnoi
Baguio City (m/26) 1978
[FEN "1r2q1k1/2p3pp/3p1r2/pPnP1p2/
4pP2/P3P1P1/5R1P/2RQ1BK1 b - - 0 23"]
In the above sequence Marin only offers sporadic annotations, possibly the
original ones by grandmaster Filip in Chess Informant #26, but here Marin
presumes the following:
"This is the moment that intrigued me. With his next move, Kortchnoi
provokes mass simplifications, leading to a draw.
"At first, I did not understand why he did that. Isn't the c5-knight strong,
at least by comparison with the presumably bad bishop?
"And then I understood: If given the time to consolidate with a3-a4 and
then triple the major pieces on the c-file, White will sacrifice an
exchange on c5, leaving Black without space and with problems
defending his backward c7-pawn.
"I did not get the Informant those days and had to content myself with
the unannotated games published in Shakhmatnii Biullettin. Looking at
Filip's laconic comment on the previous move, I understand that he had
something similar in mind."
I, however, did not come to the same conclusion. At the time, I had made a
diagram of the position and put it on a pinboard in my room, trying to make
sense of the following sequence of moves that ended the games so abruptly
and liquidated the position into a drawn endgame. Only revisiting the position
now, can I nod with recognition to the plan mentioned by Filip, but it really
only makes sense these many years later.
23…Nd3!= 24 Bxd3 exd3 25 Qxd3 Qxb5 26 Qxb5 Rxb5 27 Rxc7 Rf7!, and
a draw was agreed upon on account of 28 Rc8+ Rf8 29 Rc6 Rxd5 30 Rb2 Kf7.
As Marin points out, the impression of making the discovery of the exchange
sacrifice made him remember the game as if the exchange sacrifice had
indeed taken place. But revisiting it later, it reminded him that it did not, nor
was it even mentioned in any contemporary annotations to the game. Quite
fascinating.
Needless to say, Marin has several other games that feature this interesting
concept for an overall intriguing article.
Also very good is the article on Greece where the players Mastrovasilis (two
games), Halkias, and Kapnisis, all grandmasters, annotate, in-depth, their own
games. The games are fascinating and the annotations amazing and
exhilarating. Fantastic work, even though they pick different countries each
time, I wish these guys from Greece will return for an encore some day.
There is much to be learned from these games.
Mastrovasilis also wrote one of the surveys in the "CI Labs" feature, on the
Four Knights Scotch, and it is again excellent work. The other surveys are
also good, but this one shines a little brighter.
While not entirely perfect in its entirety, Chess Informant is a great book that
I hope will continue to find a broad readership.
A PDF file of this month's column, along with all previous columns, is
available in the ChessCafe.com Archives.