Class 8.2 - Foucault On Disciplinary Power
Class 8.2 - Foucault On Disciplinary Power
Class 8.2 - Foucault On Disciplinary Power
Marx and Weber were both reacting to the emergence of modern society, and each of them
believed that their world had been profoundly altered by the development of capitalism. Many
of the social structures that came to dominate society at that time are still with us, including
the nation-state, capitalism, democracy, and the rule of law. As such, their work is still very
relevant to attempts to understand contemporary society, and the legal system that is such a
crucial part of the social order. Yet neither society nor the law has stood still since social
theory first emerged - indeed, the pace of change in both is without precedent. As such, in the
latter part of the course, we engage with a range of thinkers whose work responds to the
changing social and legal landscape of the the 20th and 21st centuries. And we do so to deal
with a range of pressing legal and political problems, including issues of gender and rights, the
politics of security and its impact on constitutional law, climate change, and the treatment of
refugees.
We begin with the work of Michel Foucault, who has been incredibly influential across the
humanities. In this class, we look at Foucault’s Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison,
which argues that a new form of power that he calls ‘disciplinary power’ came to dominate
social organisation in the nineteenth century and that it has profoundly transformed the legal
system in that time. In our second class on Foucault, we will look at the way he broadens out
his analysis of the forms of power that are peculiar to modernity through his analysis of
‘biopower’ and its relationship to racism. A little later in the course we will look at the work
of Wendy Brown, who draws heavily on Foucault’s work on governmentality to analyse the
impact of neoliberalism on law and society.
I have provided a Smart Sparrow Exercise that introduces Foucault’s life and work. It also
covers part of the readings on disciplinary power. The idea is that covering these basics of his
analysis online will give us more time and space to discuss and analyse what he is saying in
class.
Readings
Smart Sparrow Exercise, ‘Michel Foucault,’ (which should take approximately 1 hour,
excluding the readings).
Michel Foucault, extracts from ‘The Body of the Condemned,’ ‘Panopticism,’ Discipline and
Punish: The Birth of the Prison, pp.3-16, 200-225 (please note, the reading starts at p.195.
Please feel free to read from there if you want to, but you only need to read from p.200
onwards).
1. In what way does the Panopticon illustrate the nexus between power and knowledge that
Foucault emphasises?
2. What function does the panopticon play in Foucault’s work? Ie what is the point of him
analysing this seemingly obscure idea of Bentham?
3. How do the disciplines change in the shift from ‘panopticism’ to the ‘disciplinary
society’?
4. What are the social and economic changes to which the rise of disciplinary power is
connected?
5. What is the relationship between disciplinary power and rights?
6.
Discussion
1. Foucault’s analysis of the prison maps the emergence of disciplinary power in the late
18th and 19th centuries. Do you think that his analysis is still relevant to contemporary
society?
2. It is well known now that recidivism is very high and this suggests that prisons don’t
reform prisoners in the way that Foucault’s analysis of the panopticon seems to
envisage. Does this undermine the validity and relevance of Foucault’s analysis?