Workforce Planning:: A Practical Guide
Workforce Planning:: A Practical Guide
Workforce Planning:: A Practical Guide
planning:
A practical guide
Publisher’s note
Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in this publication is accurate at
the time of printing. The author, editor and publisher cannot accept any responsibility for any
errors or omissions, however caused. No responsibility for loss or damage experienced by any
person acting, or refraining from action as a result of the contents of this document can be
accepted by the author, editor or publisher.
This publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means
beyond that permitted by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or in the case of
reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licences issued by the CLA with
prior permission of the publishers.
Enquired concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at:
ECC Ltd,
3 Gray’s Inn Square,
London WC1R 5AH.
ISBN 978-0-956-1241-1-1
2
Educational Competencies Consortium Ltd
is a not-for-profit, member-driven organisation in the higher and
further education and related sectors. It supplies its members
with a unique mix of high quality role design and analysis
products and bespoke services to enable them to deliver best
practice in people management.
We add value by helping our members develop people and
performance in a transparent and objective way.
Our role design and analysis The ECC team provides expert
products (HERA and FEDRA) support, with a deeply held
have been developed by and for belief that our work has a
the Higher and Further positive impact on the results
Education sectors and are used our members are able to
successfully in nearly 130 achieve. These are not just HR
organisations. An independent results, but contribute to the
review found HERA had fulfilled overall success of each
its design objectives and member organisation.
achieved high levels of Please contact us to talk about
satisfaction amongst managers,
how we can help you achieve
staff and trade unions. your objectives:
Our unique approach builds links
ECC Ltd
between recruitment, reward 3 Gray’s Inn Square
management, workforce London WC1R 5AH
planning and career mapping
Tel: 020 7430 8368
thus providing an integrated and Email: [email protected]
flexible approach to best
practice in people management. © ECC 2010
3
Workforce planning
CONTENTS
Introduction ........................................................................................................................5
What is workforce planning ..................................................................................................7
Why create a workforce plan .......................................................................................7
Why now? ..................................................................................................................7
Criteria for effective workforce planning ........................................................................7
Words of caution ........................................................................................................8
Planning Techniques ............................................................................................................9
Scenario planning .......................................................................................................9
Links to other plans and planners .................................................................................9
Who can help and who to involve ............................................................................... 11
Approaches to workforce planning ...................................................................................... 13
Stages of workforce planning ............................................................................................. 15
Gather and use data ................................................................................................. 16
Putting the plan together ........................................................................................... 20
Plan contents............................................................................................................ 21
Implementation................................................................................................................. 24
Ownership ................................................................................................................ 24
Managing implementation.......................................................................................... 24
Monitoring implementation ........................................................................................ 25
Evaluation ................................................................................................................ 26
Relationship with HR Policies, procedures and enablers ........................................................ 27
HR policies and processes .......................................................................................... 27
References ....................................................................................................................... 31
INTRODUCTION
This document has been written to support the development of a workforce plan. As this task
may be new to many working in higher and further education organisations, both theory and
the experiences of other organisations that have created such plans to provide assistance have
provided source material.
The guide aims to be practical so it contains checklists and tips as well as discussing the topic.
References to other sources of information are also given, in case further explanations of the
ideas proposed below are needed.
The starting point is a definition of a workforce plan and its purpose. The following definition
has been used here:
The purpose of workforce planning is to ensure that the organisation has an adequate
supply of people with the skills, knowledge and experience required to achieve its strategic
objectives efficiently and effectively, both in the short and long term.
This means that a workforce plan cannot exist in isolation, nor should it. The purpose of
planning is to identify the workforce requirements in relation to strategic objectives. This should
mean that the workforce plan’s content will facilitate their achievement and it is grounded in the
overall organisational context.
Reliable and accurate information drawn from an accurate and contemporary assessment of the
organisation and its environment will ensure the plan’s contents are comprehensive and realistic.
The implementation of the plan should also be managed so the use of project management
techniques may be helpful, as they will ensure that actions are taken in the right sequence and
milestones are met. Progress should also be monitored at regular intervals, to ensure that day-
to-day decisions are in line with the plan’s overall intent. Making sure the plan is used in this
way will help to achieve its overall objectives.
The plan will only be used if it is seen as being useful and relevant by key individuals. How and
when they are to be involved should be considered when deciding how the workforce plan will
be developed. Who to involve, and at which stage, will depend on the nature of each
organisation. Senior and middle managers will each have a distinct contribution to make at
various stages. The involvement of trade union representatives will demonstrate the
organisation’s commitment to on-going partnership working. Staff’s views can be gathered
through the use of staff surveys, focus groups and other media. Other professionals can make
a legitimate and invaluable contribution. These people include financial experts, strategic
planners, equality and diversity officers as well as human resource management and
development practitioners.
Communicating the plan’s contents is essential if it is to be used in routine decision making.
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the plan should be reviewed as part of the organisation’s
strategic planning cycle, and to consolidate learning.
The final section describes how the other core HR processes compliment the workforce plan.
The two should co-join as the HR policies and procedures are the levers and enablers that will
support the plan’s implementation and make sure actions are in line with the organisation’s
intent.
Those involved in the production of the workforce plan may benefit from some training to help
them understand the process and make full and effective contribution. This guide may also help
to give a broader understand the process and its overall context.
ECC’s consultants can provide practical support and guidance with all stages of a plan’s
development. In particular, they can help with the use of role analysis to contribute to the
understanding of the current workforce’s make-up, the design of new roles and specification of
competencies required for effective performance. ECC’s partner, Capita Survey and Research
Unit, provides pay and labour market data to help with the analysis of the relevant labour
markets. Details of these and information about the other services provided to ECC’s members
can be found on its web site – www.ecc.ac.uk – or via email to [email protected].
Why now?
In the current climate, a number of drivers are combining and the need to address these
through more robust planning and workforce planning in particular will be inescapable. These
drivers include:
o The financial imperative to make best use of the existing workforce
o The need to reduce cost and achieve productivity gains
o Pressure to deliver better services to students who, increasingly, are becoming
demanding paying customers
o The need to secure multiple sources of income and deliver quality services in return
o The importance of continuing the significant progress made in the last decade to
improve the people management practices
The use of workforce planning to underpin strategic and operational planning will make a vital
contribution to ensuring the organisation’s sustainability.
o Focusing on the major issues and identifying how to convert the workforce
challenges into action,
o Using practical and cost-effective methods for the plan’s development
o Linking long term planning to day to day activities
o Ensuring the right people are involved, but only at the required time and in the most
effective way
These criteria can be used for monitoring, evaluating and refining the planning process.
Words of caution
Planning can become an end in itself. One of universities and colleges’ major strengths is their
use of collaborative approaches. These help to ensure buy-in and input from others helps to
make sure the plan is comprehensive. However, these approaches can take a long time and do
not necessarily achieve significant improvements to the quality of the final document.
The planning process can also contain other pitfalls, which will need to be avoided. These
include:
o Seeing planning as a panacea: other action may be required to deliver the strategic
objectives
o Over-analysis can lead to paralysis: the wish to find out what other organisations are
doing and the desire to achieve perfection can mean that the sight of the main task
is lost
o Aiming to cover the whole organisation comprehensively rather than focusing on the
matters that relate directly to the achievement of the strategic plan
o Trying to do everything at once rather than prioritising actions and initiatives
Implementation can be made easier if the workload is shared, communication is effective and
the HR department is seen as the plan’s facilitator, not its owner.
PLANNING TECHNIQUES
Planning is easiest in times of stability or, at least, when it is possible to forecast the future with
some degree of accuracy. However, effective planning can be more important at times of
change as it can provide some certainty and identify areas where research will answer questions
and fill gaps in knowledge. The higher and further education sectors face a period of turbulence
because of the cuts to financial resources and a lack of certainty regarding the impact changes
to government policy will have. Similarly, other factors in the environment will have various and
different effects and their combination will affect each organisation uniquely.
Scenario planning
Scenario planning is often used to support of the development of overall strategic plans as it
provides a rigorous approach to assessing future conditions when that future is difficult to
predict. The approach can also be used for workforce planning. It is particularly valuable in
turbulent conditions when preserving the status quo or incremental change will not suffice. It
offers a systematic and sophisticated process, which engages key players by requiring them to
“live” in the future world and explore their organisation’s alternative futures thus helping them
to identify the quantum leaps needed to get there.
Its strength is that it facilitates the prediction of more than one version of the future, thus
taking account of the changes that will most probably occur between then and now. It results
in the development of a number of hypotheses specifically designed to highlight the risks and
opportunities involved in specific strategic issues. The robustness of this analysis can be used to
inform the creation of the organisation’s plans and provide contingencies, which will take
account of subsequent changes in its environment and unforeseen developments.
Sayers (2010) has written a guide to scenario planning in Higher Education for the Leadership
Foundation. She says, “Scenario planning arose in part due to a perceived lack regarding
predictive reasoning – that predictions are often wrong. In particular they often fail when they
are most needed, namely as major changes occur.” This statement can also be applied to
workforce planning.
Thus, the accuracy of forecasts can be improved by engaging in a more rigorous process that is
designed to involve key people and those with critical information. It can also improve
commitment to making the changes needed to increase the chances of the preferred future
happening.
Bechet (2008) also describes how this and other approaches can be used to help identify
staffing requirements where there is considerable uncertainty.
The following diagram highlights the areas that need to be considered to reduce uncertainty and
inform the planning process. The starting point is to specify what the plan is to achieve, within
the context of the organisation’s overall strategic plan.
Make reasonable
assumptions about
what is still not
known
Develop contingency
plans, bearing in
Assess risks mind the future is
not predictable
Often, in practice, these plans are isolated from each other. Planning can be short term and in
response to events, rather than forward looking and proactive. The strengths of workforce
planning can be found in its ability to focus holistically on the long term, on the detail of the
here and now, and to draw together the people implications of the various strategic and
operational plans.
The process encourages managers at different levels to consider the implications of decisions in
advance by highlighting and drawing together related people management and demographic
issues from across the whole organisation.
HR professionals’ key role in the process is to work with managers to help them understand the
implications of these issues and to pull together a series of related and proactive plans designed
to meet the operational targets and strategic objectives.
Who are the key people? This will depend on the stage of the plan’s development and its focus.
For example, middle managers and professional advisors will be involved at a functional level
while senior managers, specialists and heads of functional units will be involved in drawing
together the functional plans into the organisation’s strategic context.
The following pointers will aid their identification:
o People who understand the situation and issues, and the organisation’s strategic
context and its functional realities
o People who have a vested interest in success of the plan
o People who can make things happen or block progress
o Professional planners in central and operational departments and units
Finding appropriate ways to engage these people in the right way and at the right time will be
important. Frequently, people are involved through their membership of committees but this is
not the only, nor necessarily the most effective, way of achieving their participation. Meetings
are good for debate and the exchange of information and views but they need to be managed
and organised. There are other very effective ways of obtaining opinions such as the use of
discussion documents, email debates, questionnaires and one to one discussions.
However, if there is a real need to bring people together in the same place at the same time,
the group set up to develop a workforce plan should have a clear remit and time limited tasks.
It may be a work group or steering group but without this clarity of purpose, the planning
process could lose its focus and the group take on a life of its own.
Assigning responsibility to one person may be a productive way of progressing the development
of the workforce plan. This person would be responsible for consulting with key individuals and
acting as the project manager for the plan’s implementation.
The steering group could provide support to this person by checking that the plan is
comprehensive and creating the links with other plans. The steering group could also be given
the responsibility for making key decisions regarding the plan’s content as well as monitoring its
progress.
HIGHER EDUCATION
The University of Adelaide has published its approach to staff planning on its website. Its toolkit
has the following three steps:
Qualitative - internal
Information from strategic planners – potential new directions,
technology, scenario planning, new ways of working
Information from senior managers – strategic
Information from line managers – operation
Information from HR on people – skills, training needs,
attitudes and performance, potential
Quantitative – external
Qualitative – external Labour market – e.g.
Social trends demographics, skills provision,
Information
Developments in existence of training provision,
used in
technology immigration and emigration
workforce
Changing patterns of Population – demand for services
planning
consumer spending and and goods
lifestyle Benchmarking information – e.g.
CIPD survey data
Quantitative – internal
Workforce data – e.g. turnover, absence data,
demographics, training spend, recruitment spend,
working patterns, succession planning, talent
planning, competence levels achieved, skills audit etc
Organisation data – customer information, results of
strategic assessments such as feasibility of offshoring
or outsourcing, rostering requirements, orders
appropriately in each. There is a wealth of information but without a structured approach to its
collection and analysis and good understanding of what the information is actually saying, there
is a danger of gathering excessive amounts of data and losing sight of the real meaning.
Other information about the organisation’s context, as suggested by the CIPD diagram above,
may also be useful. This might include, for example, forecast information about the likely make
up of the student population in the future or an analysis of major competitors.
Plan contents
The norms of the organisation will influence the style of the plan which should be in an
acceptable and easily accessible form. Its contents should be as precise as possible and should:
Specify:
o The workforce objectives to be achieved
o Define the parameters of the plan, its focus (organisational wide or specific)
and issues to be addressed
o Any targets to be attained
o What success will look like
o Ways in which progress will be assessed and measured
Describe:
o The makeup of the current workforce
o Strengths, weaknesses, excesses and deficits in the current workforce which
relate to the objectives to be achieved
o Labour market conditions that will have an impact
Indicate strategic priorities:
o Which aspects of the strategic plan take priority
o Who will make these decisions and how
The aspects of the strategic plan should be agreed in accordance with their
comparative importance and the need to make changes quickly.
Identify the future requirements in terms:
o Functions and activities needed to deliver the strategic plan
o Roles required to carry out the functions and actions
o Competencies required to carry out those functions and activities effectively
and to the required standard
o Gaps revealed by the analysis of the current workforce profile
o Ways of organising roles and functions to achieve strategic priorities
Indicate coverage:
o The plan should be focused onto the most important strategic issues. This
may mean that priority is given to a unit or function for a period. The plan
should make it clear how the priorities will be determined
o There should be a clear relationship between the workforce plan and the HR
strategy as the latter will describe the ways in which the plan is to be delivered
and provide the parameters to guide the actions taken
Outline what changes are required and how they are to be achieved:
o Specify the changes to organisational structure and roles
o Describe how the workforce demographic profile will be altered (e.g. by
positive recruitment campaigns, provision of support to encourage applications
from under-represented groups)
o Identify options for employees occupying roles that will be changed
significantly, require fewer numbers of occupants or will no longer be needed
o Explain how the competencies, skills, expertise and numbers of employees
required to occupy the roles needed for the achievement of the strategic plan
will be sourced
Identify likely blocks, obstacles and ways in which they may be addressed
o Identify the enablers which can be deployed to deal with barriers to progress
and over-come opposition to change
Sets out how progress is to be monitored and adapted and progress assessed
o The plan will be iterative and will inevitably alter during the course of its life
time
o Milestones and indicators of achievement should be agreed at the outset and
used as part on on-going monitoring
Example
After the scenario planning workshop, the HR department was asked to work with
line managers to identify all the roles currently involved in the assessment and
feedback processes mapped during the scenario planning workshops.
A working group was set up to compare the relationship between the current
situation and the student assessment and feedback process map and to identify
where changes would be needed if the approach developed during the scenario
planning workshops was to be delivered.
The working group was asked to highlight strengths and weaknesses in the current
process and to identify where changes to role would lead to improvements. The
following were some of the areas identified as being in need of action:
o Creation of the role of Course Manager for each major course, to take
responsibility for the whole process
o Appointment of an expert in assessment and feedback processes
o Examination and alteration of the administrative and record keeping
processes to streamline them, remove duplication and reduce the
chance of mistakes
o Identification of examples of existing good practice
o Training for all staff involved in the assessment and feedback process
so they would know what the changes to the system would mean to
them in practice
o Training academic staff in ways of giving feedback and approaches to
assessment, using examples of good practice and input from the expert
o Inclusion of criteria relating to approaches and attitude to student
assessment and feedback in the recruitment, selection and promotion
criteria and in performance management processes
o Asking staff who use good practice to mentor others (and reward them
for this additional responsibility)
o Using National Student Satisfaction (NSS) results for each school to
assess achievement and take follow up action to preserve
achievement, strengthen success, and identify areas where further
action is required.
o Rewarding improvements to the NSS results achieved by course teams
The options were considered and decisions made regarding the new structure. A
workforce plan was drawn up. This described the roles required to deliver the new
processes, the structures into which they would be placed and the processes that
would be used to fill them. It also specified which roles would need to be altered
and which would be surplus to requirements.
IMPLEMENTATION
Ownership
Involving people in the development of the plan will have gone a long way towards winning
their commitment to and ensuring their participation in its enactment. The plan should also be
widely communicated throughout the organisation.
From the outset, it should be clear:
o Who will “own” the workforce plan as a whole and who will own it in parts
o What contribution will the HR, Equalities and Diversity and Staff Development and
other related professionals make
o What responsibilities will managers have, at which level
Managing implementation
Once the plan’s contents have been finalised, it will be ready to put into action. How this is to
happen should be outlined by specifying:
o How the plan is to be delivered in terms of actions to be taken, including outlining
the change management practices to be used
o The training and development needed by those responsible for managing the
changes and delivering the plan
o Who will be responsible for taking those actions
o Milestones and deadlines
o How progress will be monitoring and reviewed
o What success will look like
o How the actions will be mainstreamed into the organisation’s normal way of
working, including how keeping the workforce plan up to date will relate to the
business planning process
o How current staff will be involved in the delivery of the plan and their levels of
engagement maintained during the changes
The organisation’s ability to deliver the plan should be considered before deadlines are set.
The use of project management techniques can ensure that the implementation of the
workforce plan is linked to other processes and that deadlines are met. They will also help to
identify when certain tasks need finishing so the time demands and the availability of needed
resources can be balanced with other priorities.
Turnover is traditionally low for most staff groups and is likely to decline further as the economic
climate worsens. Therefore, the opportunities to increase the flexibility of working practices and
contracts should be taken whenever they occur.
The person responsible for the development of the plan may be given the role of project
manager or it could be assigned to another person. The key aspect of their role will be to
ensure that the decisions outlined in the workforce plan are translated into everyday decisions.
Another key responsibility will be to maintain progress.
Lifelong Learning UK, in its report “Occupational map for the higher education sectors”, noted
that project management skills are being in short supply. Developing these amongst those
responsible for the development and implementation of the workforce plan, before the work
begins could, therefore, be worthwhile.
Monitoring implementation
Some of the anticipated scenarios used as the basis for the workforce plan may alter with the
passage of time. Some will become more likely, some will become less so and new factors will
emerge. These changes may result in a refocus of the plan. For example if the actions taken to
address attendance management issues are being effective, focus can turn to other issues and
plan adjusted to take account of these developments.
Indicators of progress can be combined with the other performance management indicators
used to assess changes to the make-up of the workforce. These could include, for example,
statistics used to monitor the effectiveness of attendance management actions and turnover
data. These will provide the information needed to make periodic reports on progress to senior
managers and others with a key interest in the plan’s implementation.
Inevitably, a review of the plan will be needed during its implementation and any changes
deemed necessary should be decided with the same rigour as that used to make the original
decisions.
The project manager will be responsible for reporting progress. There is a danger of the
workforce plan becoming an end in itself rather than being a tool to support the achievement of
operational and strategic objectives. Therefore, reports on progress may need to be interlinked
and closely related.
The Universities HR group has produced a web-based tool called the “People Management
Framework”. Further information and how the framework can be accessed are given on the
UHR web site.
The first step in the use of the framework is to specify a number of organisational imperatives.
HR activities are mapped against them to identify the impact those activities are having on
organisational success. The components of the workforce plan will therefore inform the
population of the framework and its use will help to monitor the plan’s implementation.
The use of the framework will also provide a mechanism for periodical reviews of the workforce
plan. This review should also link with the business planning and budget setting processes,
both of which will have implications on workforce needs and resource availability, and
performance and development review and workload allocation. Critically, the workforce plan
should include indicators, which can be used to support the assessment of progress and to
make sure that difficult issues are addressed. Regular reference to these will help to maintain
momentum and reinforce the importance of the plan.
MAINTAINING AND REFRESHING THE DATA USED FOR WORKFORCE PLANNING
The analysis of the organisation’s workforce and its operating context will have informed the
drafting of the workforce plan. This analysis will have made use of data drawn from a number
of different sources. The origins of the data should be recorded so that it will be easy to get
back to the source in case any checks are needed.
If the data sources are allowed to become out of date, updating the plan will be more difficult
and time consuming. Therefore, it is important that the sources should be kept up to date. The
easiest way of doing this is to build updating processes, including quality assurance checks, into
every day routines. If the same data sources underpin normal and routine decisions, keeping
them up to date will happen as a matter of course.
Evaluation
The evaluation of the plan’s utility and success can be both formative and summative. The
formative evaluation will take place as the plan’s implementation is monitored on an on-going
basis.
The summative evaluation will take place formally at fixed points in time. This will be essential
if subsequent plans are to take advantage of any learning accrued from the assessment of what
went well and not so well, and why.
The critical test of success will be against the purpose of workforce planning. Has the plan
ensured that the organisation has the people with the skills, knowledge and experience required
to achieve its strategic objectives? If the answer is yes, then the plan will have worked.
The next set of questions will concern how well and how efficiently the plan achieved this end.
The evaluation can therefore be used to identify what led to success and what prevented
achievement. Both will provide useful information on which to base future action.
The exercise may also benefit from benchmarking against other organisations. Universities and
colleges are familiar with the use of comparative assessments and a number of tools to support
these are already in existence. These include HEIDE, which draws on the data supplied to HESA
and allows a particular university to select others, regionally, by mission group or other
variables, with whom it wishes to compare itself. The DLA-Piper benchmarking service and the
UHR people management framework provide for similar comparisons using a number of HR
measures and ratios.
development processes, can enrich the picture and allow the organisation to plan the
deployment of its human assets to meet their full potential.
The creation of a talent bank can contribute to the assessment of the organisation’s human
resource. It can also be used to inform a succession plan that will identify areas of potential
shortages and areas of excesses. This should also highlight ways in which future staffing
requirements can be met by developing the capabilities of current employees or identify where
the recruitment of people with the necessary knowledge, skills and experience will be necessary.
Evidence from other sectors suggests that the organisations most likely to recover quickly from
recession are those that invested in the development of their existing workforce. This approach
can be effective as it can go some way to maintaining levels of morale, motivation and
productivity during periods of considerable organisational change.
The approach can also be more economical and reliable. Recruitment is always costly and can
be uncertain as the appointment of new staff contains elements of risk and the vagaries of the
labour market can affect the chances of appointing staff of the required calibre.
Training and development
The identification of training and development needs should flow from a comparison of the
organisation’s strategic requirements and the appraisal of the workforce capabilities made
through processes such as those used to inform the succession plan and create the talent bank.
A systematic approach to needs identification rather than responding to individual requests can
help to prioritise them in relation to the organisation’s and will align alongside other action
required to satisfy its strategic imperatives.
Looking forward will also provide more lead-time, thus creating opportunities for the use of a
greater range of development methods and provide a direct link between development and
organisational change.
Knowledge and skill development
The scenarios developed during the creation of the workforce plan may indicate a general need
for new ways of working across the organisation. This could require significant numbers of
employees to develop new competencies and learn new practices and skills.
The longer lead times provided by workforce planning will also enable staff to acquire new
knowledge, for example, by following qualification courses or using other structured learning
methods.
Acquiring new competencies
Some competencies or areas of expertise required but not available within the existing
workforce may be difficult to acquire through development and learning and so will have to be
sourced externally.
Recruitment is the most common way of acquiring needed skills or expertise, though other
options are available, including:
o Commissioning training providers to stimulate the supply of needed skills
o Introducing schemes such as Modern Apprenticeships or trainee programmes
Turnover
The analysis of turnover patterns and trends will have revealed the location and characteristics
of those who leave the organisation. It will also show where turnover is comparatively high and
where it is low. While the retention of people with skills and knowledge is important in terms of
continuity and keeping recruitment costs down, it can also lead to stagnation and block
changes.
Consequently, the workforce plan may identify areas where turnover needs to be stimulated as
well as areas where a reduction may be beneficial.
Attendance management
High levels of sickness absence are also a cost that can be reduced by the introduction of
attendance management processes. The analysis of the workforce data will show where
absence patterns are high and differentiate between short and long-term absence.
If these are deemed problematic, either because work is not being done or replacement costs
are high, the workforce plan should identify what actions need to be taken to remedy the
situation.
Redeployment and redundancy
The workforce plan should identify which roles and areas of work are likely to be surplus to
requirements, just as much as highlighting which roles will need to be changed and identifying
areas where new roles will be needed. The plan should also describe what the processes would
be used to deal with the surpluses. These may include:
o Retraining individual employees so they are able to acquire the skills and knowledge
required in the changed roles
o Redeploying employees into different or new roles. This may also include some
retraining
o Developing affected employees’ potential to fill skill gaps or take on other areas of
work
o Considering how the future employment of role holders so affected may be curtailed
through the use of a mix of voluntary and compulsory redundancies or early or ill
health retirement or by a change in their contractual status
o Helping staff leave the organisation through the use of career counsellors,
outplacement consultants and other forms of practical assistance
Consulting with employees likely to be effected by redundancy and their trade union
representatives is a legal requirement as well as being good practice. The timely provision of
good quality information and practical support are also advisable.
REFERENCES
Bechet, Thomas P. (2008) Strategic staffing: a comprehensive system for effective workforce
planning. 2nd edition. American Management Association. New York.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2010) Workforce planning: right people,
right time, right skills. CIPD. London.
Educational Competencies Consortium (2008) Developing people, delivering results. ECC.
London.
Improvement and Development Agency Workforce resources and good practice. From
www.idea.gov.uk/idk/core/page.do?pageId=9110444
Institute for Employment Studies (2010) The HR agenda for 2010; ten top trends as we come
out of recession. IES. Brighton.
Lifelong Learning UK. (2010) Occupational map for the higher education sectors: Preliminary
findings, March 2010. LL UK. London.
Sayers, Nicola (2010) A guide to scenario planning in higher education. Leadership Foundation
for Higher Education. London.
University of Adelaide (2010) Workforce planning for schools and administrative units and Staff
planning tool. From www.adelaide.edu.au/hr/managers/wkpl-strategy/
OTHER REFERENCES
Barrett, Lucinda and Barrett, Peter (2008) The management of academic workloads: full report
on findings. Research and Development Series. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
London.
Barrett, Peter and Barrett, Lucinda (2009) The management of academic workloads: improving
practice in the sector. Research and Development Series. Leadership Foundation for Higher
Education. London.
Casu, Barbara and Thanassoulis, Emmanuel. (2006) Evaluating cost efficiency in central
administrative services in UK universities Omega, the international journal of management
science 34 (5) pp 417-426
Goold, Michael and Campbell, Andrew (2002) Designing effective organisations. Josey Bass,
San Francisco.
Handy, Charles (1995) The empty raincoat: making sense of the future. Random House.
Higher Education Funding Council (2010) The higher education workforce framework 2010:
overview report. HEFCE. Bristol.
PA Consulting Group (2010) The future workforce for Higher Education: a report to HEFCE.
PA Consulting Group. London.
Sellers-Rubio, R., Mas-Ruiz, F.J. and Casado-Diaz, A. (2010) University efficiency:
complementariness versus trade-off between teaching, research and administrative activities.
Higher Education Quarterly 64 (4) October 2010 pp 373 – 391.
Vitae (2009) Careers in research: online survey 2009 analysis of aggregated UK results. CRAC.
Cambridge.