The document provides an overview of public international law research. It defines public international law as governing relations between states and now also includes relations with international organizations, private entities, and individuals. States are the primary actors and are sovereign within their borders. There are differences from US law as international law develops horizontally without a formal hierarchy or compulsory jurisdiction. The primary sources of international law are treaties, customary law, and general principles according to the ICJ statute. Subsidiary sources include judicial decisions and scholarly works.
The document provides an overview of public international law research. It defines public international law as governing relations between states and now also includes relations with international organizations, private entities, and individuals. States are the primary actors and are sovereign within their borders. There are differences from US law as international law develops horizontally without a formal hierarchy or compulsory jurisdiction. The primary sources of international law are treaties, customary law, and general principles according to the ICJ statute. Subsidiary sources include judicial decisions and scholarly works.
The document provides an overview of public international law research. It defines public international law as governing relations between states and now also includes relations with international organizations, private entities, and individuals. States are the primary actors and are sovereign within their borders. There are differences from US law as international law develops horizontally without a formal hierarchy or compulsory jurisdiction. The primary sources of international law are treaties, customary law, and general principles according to the ICJ statute. Subsidiary sources include judicial decisions and scholarly works.
The document provides an overview of public international law research. It defines public international law as governing relations between states and now also includes relations with international organizations, private entities, and individuals. States are the primary actors and are sovereign within their borders. There are differences from US law as international law develops horizontally without a formal hierarchy or compulsory jurisdiction. The primary sources of international law are treaties, customary law, and general principles according to the ICJ statute. Subsidiary sources include judicial decisions and scholarly works.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
Chapter 1: Public International Legal Research
Introduction and Foundation Principles
o There are considerable differences in the value and weight of authority ascribed to the sources of international law; two of the primary sources of law, treaties and custom, are equally positioned in the hierarchy; some of the primary sources of law have no official publication and can only be demonstrated through the use of subsidiary sources of law. o There is also no hierarchical structure for international tribunals, often no compulsory jurisdiction, and no formal recognition of the doctrine of stare decisis. Definition of Public International Law o Public international law has been defined as a body of rules governing the relations between and among States. o Historically, public international law has had its roots in matters related to wartime and the law of the sea. o More recently, it has grown to cover a variety of subject areas from contracts to the environment, human rights, labor, patents, and trademark, among others. o The definition of international law has grown and expanded to include the law that governs relations not only between States but also among international organizations, private entities and even, at times, individuals. o States are the principal actors on the international stage. States are considered sovereign in the sense that they control what happens within their borders. Sovereignty implies that States recognize and respect that they cannot compel another State to take a certain action within its own borders. Legal Personality: States, International Organizations, and Individuals o The creation, development, and enforcement of law on the international stage is not akin to the creation, development, and enforcement of U.S. law. o Grasping the concept of horizontal law-making is one of the challenges that U.S. legal researchers encounter as they prepare to conduct public international legal research. o Another fundamental difference between U.S. legal research and international legal research is the distinction between a source of law as binding authority and a source of law as a publication that represents or contains that binding authority. Sources of Public International Law o Article 38(1) of the Statute of the ICJ From a legal research perspective, soft law may be reflected in: (1) The language of Article 38(1) does not explicitly create a hierarchy of authority. For research purposes, it is generally best to proceed in the order listed as treaties tend to create a more specific legal obligation than customary international law or general principles and therefore will ordinarily prevail under the legal maxim lex specialis derogat legi generali. While every subsidiary source may fairly be characterized a secondary source, not every secondary source may be use as a subsidiary source. o Jus cogens Latin phrase generally interpreted in English to mean “compelling law.” Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) recognizes jus cogens as a source of public international law that preempts the other five enumerated sources of law. o U.N. General Assembly Resolutions Passed (Nearly) Unanimously The International Law Commission (ILC), which was established by the U.N. General Assembly to study and codify international law, recently concluded that resolutions of international organizations cannot themselves constitute international law or serve as conclusive evidence of a rule of customary international law. o Soft Law 1. Treaties not yet in force 2. Some provisions of international conventions (those that are advisory or aspirational in nature) 3. Political declarations made by two or more states; that is, voluntarily observed standards 4. U.N. General Assembly resolutions, particularly when they are unanimous or near unanimous 5. In codes of conduct and codes of practice that govern international players 6. Action plans 7. Final acts of international conferences Conclusion o Researchers should remember that these sources are categorized as either primary sources, subsidiary sources of law, or peremptory norms. o The primary sources of public international law include (1) treaties, (2) custom, and (3) general principles. o Subsidiary sources include (4) judicial decisions and the (5) writings of highly qualified publicists. o Peremptory norms are (6) norms that are so fundamental to the international community that no derogation from them is permitted.
Chapter 2: US Legal Research Basics
Chapter 4: Customary International Law
Sources of international law
o Article 38 of the International Court of Justice statute states: o 1. The Court, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply: a. international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states; b. international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law; c. the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations; d. subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law. Treaties vs. executive agreement o Treaties require 2/3 Senate majority o Executive agreements or order are signed by the President without the Senate’s consent Signing vs. Ratifying