CANDELARIA & ROSALES PIL Case List 1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses the remaining class schedule and options for different topics of discussion including sovereignty, jurisdiction, state responsibility and settlement of disputes.

Options A, B, C and D listing different schedules for discussing sovereignty and jurisdiction laws, state responsibility cases and laws, and settlement of disputes across the remaining class days in May.

Special topics mentioned include law of the sea, human rights/international criminal justice, terrorism, environment, international economic law, and international development.

Housekeeping

– Remaining Class Days: May 4, 11, 18, 25


– Target: No Class on May 25, Synthesis/Diagnostic Exam on May 18
– Select Special Topic:
o Law of the Sea
o Human Rights/International Criminal Justice
o Terrorism
o Environment
o International Economic Law
o International Development
– Options:
o Schedule A
§ Sovereignty and Jurisdiction Laws, etc. on May 4
§ State Responsibility Cases and Laws, etc. on May 4
§ Settlement of Disputes on May 11
§ Synthesis/Diagnostic Exam on May 18 (inc. discussion on one of
the special topics)
o Schedule B
§ Sovereignty and Jurisdiction Laws, etc. on May 4
§ State Responsibility Cases and Laws, etc. on May 11
§ Settlement of Disputes on May 11
• This may require an extension of class hours on May 11.
§ Synthesis/Diagnostic Exam on May 18 (inc. discussion on one of
the special topics)
o Schedule C
§ Sovereignty and Jurisdiction Laws, etc. on May 4
§ State Responsibility Cases and Laws, etc. on May 11
§ Settlement of Disputes on May 18
§ Synthesis/Diagnostic Exam on May 25 (inc. discussion on one of
the special topics)
o Schedule D
§ Sovereignty and Jurisdiction Laws, etc. on May 4
§ State Responsibility Cases and Laws, etc. on May 11
§ Settlement of Disputes on May 18
§ No Synthesis/Diagnostic Exam

Settlement of Disputes
A. The Use or Threat of Force
i. Prohibition on the Threat or Use of Force
ii. Unilateral Use of Force
iii. Collective Action through the United Nations
iv. The Laws of War
B. Peaceful Settlement of Disputes
i. Claims
ii. Arbitration and Judicial Settlement of International Disputes

Law/Resolutions/Commentary Cases
General Treaty for the Renunciation of War • Nicaragua Case (Merits) (Nicaragua v. US),
1928, 94 LNTS 57 ICJ Reports 1986, p. 14
• The Caroline Case, 29 BFSP 1137-1138; 30
UN Charter, arts. 2(4), 2(7) 39-51, BFSP 195-96
• Oil Platforms Case (Iran v. US) ICJ Reports
Declaration on the Inadmissibility of 2003, p. 161
Intervention in the Domestic Affairs of States
• Armed Activities Case (DR Congo v.
and the Protection of their Independence and
Uganda), ICJ Reports 2005, p. 168
Sovereignty 1965, UN GA Resolution No. 2131
(XX), 21 December 1965 • Partial Award: Ius Ad Bellum: Ethiopia’s
Claims 1-8, Eritrea Ethiopia Claimns
UN Security Council Resolutions Commission 2005
• 668 (1991) • The Entebbe Incident, UN Doc. S/PV 1939
pp. 27, 51-59, 92; UN Doc. S/PV 1941, pp.
• July 7, 1950
31-32
• 661 (1990)
• Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear
• 665 (1990) Weapons Case, Advisory Opinion, ICJ
• 678 (1990) Reports 1996, p. 226
• 687 (1991) • U.S. v. Yunis 681 F. Supp 896 (1988)
• 1441 (2002) • Interpretation of Article 3, Paragraph 2 of
• 1973 (2011) the Treaty of Lausanne, Advisory Opinion,
PCIJ Reports, Series B, No. 12, p. 26
NATO Intervention in Kosovo, Security • Interhandel Case, ICJ Reports 1959, p. 6
Council, 3998th meeting, UN Doc S/PV 3998 • Norwegian Loans Case (France v. Norway),
(1999) ICJ Reports 1957, p. 9
• Nicaragua Case (Jurisdiction and
Possible Humanitarian Intervention in Syria,
Admissibility) (Nicaragua v. US), ICJ Reports
(2013) 84 BYIL (806)
1984, p. 392
THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS: A • East Timor Case (Portugal v. Australia), ICJ
COMMENTARY VOL. 1 (SIMMA ET AL. EDS) Reports 1995, p. 90
• Mindia Vashakmadze, Responsibility to Protect • Lagrand Case (Germany v. US), ICJ Reports
2001, p. 466
• Michael Bothe, Peacekeeping
• Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear
Resolution on the Definition of Aggression Wapons Case, Advisory Opinion, ICJ
1974, UN GA Resolution No. 3314 (XXIX), 14 Reports 1996, p. 226
December 1974 • Case Concerning Questions of Interpretation
and Application of the Montreal Convention
Arising out of the Aerial Incident at
Lockerbie (Provisional Measures) (Libya v.
UK), ICJ Reports 1992, p. 3
• Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (U.S. v.
Bulgaria) Judgement of October 24, 1957,
ICJ Reports, P. 24
• El Salvador v. Honduras (Nicaragua
Intervention), Judgement of 11 September
1992, ICJ Reports 1992, p. 2
• PCA Case No. 2013-19 Arbitration between
RP and PRC (Award of 29 October 2015)
• Del Monte v. CA, GR 136154, February 7,
2001
• LM Power v. Capitol, GR 141833, March 26,
2003
• Frabelle v. Philamlife, GR 158560, August
17, 2007
• Gonzales v. Hon Pimentel, GR 167994,
January 22, 2007
• RCBC v. Banco de Oro, 687 SCRA 583
• United States [North American Dredging
Co. of Texas] v. United Mexican States (4
RIAA 26, 1927)
• Dissent of Judge Nielsen in the subsequent
case of International Fisheries Co., (Nielsen’s
Opinions 207, 1931)
• The Tattler (United States v. Great Britain,
Nielsen Rep. 489, 1920)
• The Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case
(Estonia v. Lithuania, PCIJ Series A/B, No.
76, 1939)
• Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v.
Guatemala, ICJ Reports 4, 1955)
• Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction
(Belgium v. Spain, ICJ Reports 3, 1970)
• Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Peter L.F.
Sabbatino (376 U.S. 398, 1964)
• Alfred Dunhill of London Inc. v. The
Republic of Cuba (425 U.S. 682, 48 L.Ed.
2d.301, 1976)
• Buttes Gas and Oil Co. and Another v.
Hammer and Another (3 W.L.R. 787, H.L.
1981)
• Vinuya v. Romulo, GR 162230, April 28,
2010 ; August 12, 2014

You might also like