Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 219 views

    Santiago Alvarez Also Known As

    Uploaded by

    Anamae
    Santiago Alvarez's account is considered a primary source as he was present at the Tejeros Convention and wrote about it on the same day. His writing contains emotions and quotes individuals. Teodoro Agoncillo's account is a secondary source as it was written years later in 1947. It provides context and connects the events to the present day. Internal criticisms found Alvarez's writing was detailed while Agoncillo's was well-researched. External criticisms found Alvarez's account as original given the context, while Agoncillo expanded on terms to make the source more relatable without changing its meaning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Santiago Alvarez Also Known As

    Uploaded by

    Anamae
    219 views2 pages
    Santiago Alvarez's account is considered a primary source as he was present at the Tejeros Convention and wrote about it on the same day. His writing contains emotions and quotes individuals. Teodoro Agoncillo's account is a secondary source as it was written years later in 1947. It provides context and connects the events to the present day. Internal criticisms found Alvarez's writing was detailed while Agoncillo's was well-researched. External criticisms found Alvarez's account as original given the context, while Agoncillo expanded on terms to make the source more relatable without changing its meaning.

    Original Description:

    short

    Original Title

    Santiago Alvarez also known as

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Santiago Alvarez's account is considered a primary source as he was present at the Tejeros Convention and wrote about it on the same day. His writing contains emotions and quotes individuals. Teodoro Agoncillo's account is a secondary source as it was written years later in 1947. It provides context and connects the events to the present day. Internal criticisms found Alvarez's writing was detailed while Agoncillo's was well-researched. External criticisms found Alvarez's account as original given the context, while Agoncillo expanded on terms to make the source more relatable without changing its meaning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    219 views2 pages

    Santiago Alvarez Also Known As

    Uploaded by

    Anamae
    Santiago Alvarez's account is considered a primary source as he was present at the Tejeros Convention and wrote about it on the same day. His writing contains emotions and quotes individuals. Teodoro Agoncillo's account is a secondary source as it was written years later in 1947. It provides context and connects the events to the present day. Internal criticisms found Alvarez's writing was detailed while Agoncillo's was well-researched. External criticisms found Alvarez's account as original given the context, while Agoncillo expanded on terms to make the source more relatable without changing its meaning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    1.

    Santiago Alvarez also known as “General Apoy”, was a revolutionary general and founder of the
    first directorate of the Nacionalista Party. He was born on July 25 th 1872 in Imus, Cavite.
    (“Pambansang Komisyong Pangkasaysayan”) His name was mentioned several times in the given
    example which indicates that his writing was a primary source; since he was present on the day
    the event in Tejeros Convention took place. Also, his writing is written on his point of view
    where his emotions were evident.
    2. Teodoro Agoncillo is a Filipino Historian of the 20 th century. His account was written in the year
    1947; indicating that his work is a secondary source since it was written years after the event
    took place. Also, he was able to add details on his account relating the events to the present and
    it is in a third person’s point of view.

    Santiago Alvarez Teodoro Agoncillo


    (Primary Source) (Secondary Source)
    His account mentioned that it is General His account shows that it is Santiago
    Apoy who withstand with Antonio Alvarez who reminded Antonio
    Montenegro saying the lines “We of the Montenegro about the recognition of the
    Katipunan…We are not bandits who rob government organized by the Association
    others property and wealth”. of the Sons of the people.

    An oath taking was held at the Tanza HIs account did not mention about the
    Parish house in the absence of the oath taking that happened at Tanza Parish
    Supremo on March 27, 1897 house.

    It is stated that the Tejeros Convention for It is March 22, 1897 that the Tejeros
    election happened on March 25, 1897 not convention took place just in time of
    March 22, 1897. Aguinaldo’s birthday.

    The Supremo along with the Magdiwang The account did not mention about the
    leaders waited till 5 in the afternoon the second meeting initiated by the Magdalo
    following day to continue the meeting president, Baldomero Aguinaldo.
    happened last Marh 25, 1897 through the
    invitation of Magdalo President Baldomero
    Aguinaldo

    Diego Mojica point out the anomalies on It is only a suspicion of Bonifacio that an
    the ballots distributed by Tirona being anomaly was happening but no direct
    already filled out not by themselves but person whom pointed it out.
    the Supremo just ignored it.
    4. Form your internal and external criticisms over the two sources.

    Internal

     Alvarez’ writing was detailed; there are dialogues between characters and dates of events
    were clearly stated. Being the witness of the event is evident in his writing especially the
    apparent emotions of Alvarez.
     Agoncillo’s writing is clear and well researched since he was able to expound in details
    about what happened in the past. He was able to clearly convey the idea of the source.

    External

     Alvarez was born before the event took place, his name was mentioned several times, his
    account was made the same day the events happened and words used were simple; these
    indicate that his account is valid and original.
     Agoncillo expounded the terms of Alvarez in order for the people to relate the past with
    the present without changing the idea of his source e.g. the word “bandits” used by
    Alvarez was changed to “rebels” which is known to Filipinos in the modern era.

    You might also like