Evidence Law Assignment PDF
Evidence Law Assignment PDF
Evidence Law Assignment PDF
ASSIGNMENT
UNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW
UNIVERSITY OF
LUCKNOW
2020-21
2
Index
1 Introduction 3
2 Section-18(Whose Admission 5
will be relevant?)
3 Proof of Admission 6
5 8
Bibliography
3
ADMISSION
Introduction
Admission plays a very important part in judicial proceedings. If one party to a suit or any
other proceeding proves that the other party has admitted his case, the work of the court
becomes easier.
1. Oral.
2. Documentary.
3. In Electronic Form3.
But its relevancy depends on whether it satisfies the conditions mentioned in Section
18 to 23.4
5
Mayo v. Mayo (1949) P.172.
6
Section 8 Illustration (g).
5
SECTION-18
(Whose admission will be relevant?)
Section -18 rules down the parties whose admission will be relevant.
1. PARTIES TO THE SUIT: - All the statements made by the parties to the
suit that makes an inference as to a relevant fact or fact in issue is relevant.
In case of defendants, a defendant’s admission of one does not bind his co-defendants, but in
the case of plaintiffs it binds the co-plaintiff’s as they share a common interest, the admission
of one will bound on co-plaintiff’s7.
7
Kashmira Singh v. State of M.P (AIR 1952 SC 159.)
6
PROOF OF ADMISSION
(SECTION-21)
Admissions are relevant and may be proved as against the person who makes them or
his representative in interest but they cannot be proved by or on behalf of the person
who makes them or by his representative in interest, except in the following cases.
(1) An admission may be proved by or on behalf of the person making it, when it is of
such a nature that, if the person making it were dead it would be relevant as
between the third person under section 32.
(2) An admission may be proved by or on behalf of the person making it, when it
consists of a statement of the existence of any state of mind or body, relevant or in
issue, made at or about the time when such state of mind or body existed, and is
accompanied by conduct rendering its falsehood improbable.
In the case of R. v. Petcherini8 it was held that “if a man makes the declaration
accompanying any act it is evidence but declaration must be made two days or
three days, or a week, previous to the transaction in question cannot be evidence
otherwise it would be easy for a man to lay grounds for escaping the
consequences of wrongful act by making such declarations.”
Section 22 & 22(A):- Section 22, along with the Sec-65 and Sec-22A was
inserted by the I.T. Act of 2000. It provides that the oral admission as to the
content of documents or electronic records is irrelevant unless the question is
about the document or record being forged or genuine.
8
1885, 7 Cox CC 70.
7
Section – 23 of Indian Evidence Act deals with the relevancy of admission in civil
cases.
In civil cases when a statement or an admission is made without prejudice, it is not
relevant.
This section meant to reach a compromise between parties and to avoid litigation.
It protects the every admission made where without prejudice is expressly or
impliedly stated and they can’t be disclosed in the court except by consent of both the
parties to suit.
8
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Books:-
Batuklal, The Law of Evidence, Central Law Agency,Allahabd, 23rd Edition 2020.
2. Act :-
3. Web-Links:-
www.lawnn.com/law-evidence-admissions-admissions-indian-evidence-act-1872/