Electronically Filed Jan 04 2021 11:26 A.M. Elizabeth A. Brown Clerk of Supreme Court

Electronically Filed
1/1/2021 8:43 PM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT
ANOA
1
Mark A. Hutchison (4639)
2 Jacob A. Reynolds (10199)
Piers R. Tueller (14633)
3 HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
Peccole Professional Park Electronically Filed
4 Jan 04 2021 11:26 a.m.
10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Elizabeth A. Brown
Telephone: (702) 385-2500 Clerk of Supreme Court
6 Facsimile: (702) 385-2086
7 Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
8 [email protected]
9 Attorneys for Intervening Plaintiff
10 Stavros Anthony
11 EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

12 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
13
ROSS MILLER, an individual, Case No. A-20-824971-W
14 Dept. No. XI
Plaintiff/Petitioner,
15
v.
16
CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL
17 COMMISSIONERS, a local government entity;
and DOES I – X, inclusive,
18
19 Defendant
20
STAVROS ANTHONY, an individual,
21
22 Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
23
CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF
24 COMMISSIONERS, a local government entity;
25 ROSS MILLER, an individual,
26 Defendants.
27
///
28
1 of 3
Docket 82269 Document 2021-00040
Case Number: A-20-824971-W
1
2 Notice is given that Stavros Anthony, Intervening Plaintiff in the above captioned matter,
3 appeals to the Supreme Court of Nevada from the following Orders:
4 1. The District Court’s Order denying Intervenor Stavros Anthony’s Motion for
5 Preliminary Injunction entered in this action on December 4, 2020; and
6 2. The District Court’s Order denying Intervenor Stavros Anthony’s Motion for Writ of
7 Mandamus entered in this action on December 31, 2020; and
8 3. Any and all orders and judgments rendered appealable by the foregoing.
9 DATED this 1st day of January, 2021.
10 HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
11
12 /s/ Mark A. Hutchison
Mark A. Hutchison (4639)
13
Jacob A. Reynolds (10199)
14 Piers R. Tueller (14633)
Peccole Professional Park
15 10080 W. Alta Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
16
17 Attorneys for Intervening Plaintiff
Stavros Anthony
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of Hutchison & Steffen, PLLC and that
3
on this 1st day of January, 2021, I caused the above and foregoing document entitled AMENDED
4
5 NOTICE OF APPEAL to be served through the Court's mandatory electronic service system, per
6 EDCR 8.02, upon the following:
7 TO ALL THE PARTIES ON THE E-SERVICE LIST
8
/s/ Kaylee Conradi
9 An Employee of Hutchison & Steffen, PLLC
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 of 3
EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
CASE SUMMARY
CASE NO. A-20-824971-W
Ross Miller, Plaintiff(s) § Location: Department 11
vs. § Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth
Clark County Board of Commissioners, Defendant(s) § Filed on: 11/17/2020
§ Case Number History:
§ Cross-Reference Case A824971
Number:
CASE INFORMATION
Case Type: Other Civil Matters
Case
11/17/2020 Open
Status:
DATE CASE ASSIGNMENT
Current Case Assignment

Case Number A-20-824971-W
Court Department 11
Date Assigned 11/19/2020
Judicial Officer Gonzalez, Elizabeth
PARTY INFORMATION
Lead Attorneys
Plaintiff Miller, Ross Gentile, Dominic P.
Retained
702-862-8300(W)
Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners Miller, Mary-Anne Meyers

Retained
7024554761(W)
Intervenor Clark County Board of Commissioners Miller, Mary-Anne Meyers

Defendant Retained
7024554761(W)
Miller, Ross Gentile, Dominic P.

Retained
702-862-8300(W)
Intervenor Anthony, Stavros Hutchison, Mark A

Plaintiff Retained
702-385-2500(W)
DATE EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT INDEX
EVENTS
11/17/2020 Complaint
Filed By: Intervenor Defendant Miller, Ross
ELECTION-RELATED ACTION - Verified Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
and Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition
11/17/2020 Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure

Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
11/18/2020 Notice of Appearance

Party: Intervenor Defendant Miller, Ross
PAGE 1 OF 6 Printed on 01/04/2021 at 10:40 AM

CASE SUMMARY
CASE NO. A-20-824971-W
Notice of Appearance of Counsel
11/18/2020 Notice of Department Reassignment

Notice of Department Reassignment
11/18/2020 Peremptory Challenge

Filed by: Intervenor Defendant Miller, Ross
Peremptory Challenge of Judge
11/18/2020 Acceptance of Service

Acceptance of Service
11/18/2020 Notice of Appearance

Party: Intervenor Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners
Notice of Appearance of Counsel


11/20/2020 Media Request and Order

Media Request and Order Allowing Camera Access to Court Proceedings
11/24/2020 Media Request and Order

Media Request and Order - KSNV
11/24/2020 Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure

Filed By: Intervenor Plaintiff Anthony, Stavros
Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
11/24/2020 Complaint in Intervention

Complaint in Intervention
11/25/2020 Order Shortening Time

Motion for Preliminary Injunction on an Order Shortening Time Before Tuesday, December 1,
2020
11/30/2020 Response
Response to Intervenor's Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/30/2020 Reply in Support

Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction on an Order Shortening Time Before
Tuesday, December 1, 2020
12/01/2020 Stipulation and Order

Stipulation and Order

CASE SUMMARY
CASE NO. A-20-824971-W
12/01/2020 First Amended Complaint

First Amended Complaint in Intervention
12/02/2020 Transcript of Proceedings

Transcript of Proceedings: Motion for Preliminary Injunction on an Order Shortening Time
before Tuesday, December 1, 2020
12/04/2020 Order Denying Motion

Order Denying Intervenor s Motion For Preliminary Injunction
12/07/2020 Stipulation and Order

Filed by: Intervenor Plaintiff Anthony, Stavros
Stipulation and Order
12/08/2020 Notice of Entry of Stipulation and Order

Notice of Entry of Stipulation and Order
12/10/2020 Motion
Motion for Writ of Mandamus requiring the Clark County Board of Commissioners to Order a
New Election for Clark County Commission District C
12/14/2020 Response
Plaintiff's Opposition to Intervenor's Motion for Writ of Mandamus Requiring the Clark
County Board of Commissioners to Order a New Election for Clark County Commission
District C
12/14/2020 Joinder
Filed By: Intervenor Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners
Joinder to Plaintiff's Opposition to Intervenor's Motion for Writ of Mandamus Requiring the
Clark County Board of Commissioners to Order a New Election for Clark County Commission
District C
12/14/2020 Supplement
Plaintiff s Supplement to Opposition to Intervenor s Motion for Writ of Mandamus Requiring
the Clark County Board of Commissioners to Order a New Election for Clark County
Commission District C
12/16/2020 Reply in Support

Reply in Support of Motion for Writ of Mandamus Requiring the Clark County Board of
Commissioners to Order a New Election for Clark County Commission District C
12/17/2020 Transcript of Proceedings

Transcript of Proceedings: Telephonic Conference At Request of Court November 20, 2020
12/29/2020 Notice of Entry of Order

Notice of Entry of Order Denying Intervenor Motion For Preliminary Injunction

CASE SUMMARY
CASE NO. A-20-824971-W
12/29/2020 Notice of Appeal

Notice of Appeal
12/29/2020 Case Appeal Statement

Case Appeal Statement
12/31/2020 Order
Order Denying Intervenor Plaintiff s Motion for Writ of Mandamus Requiring the Clark
County Board of Commissioners to Order a New Election for Clark County Commission
District C
12/31/2020 Notice of Entry of Order

Filed By: Intervenor Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners
Notice of Entry of Order Denying Intervenor Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Mandaum
Requiring the Clark County Board of Commissioners to Order a New Election for Clark
County Commission District C
01/01/2021 Amended Notice of Appeal

Party: Intervenor Plaintiff Anthony, Stavros
Amended Notice of Appeal
HEARINGS
11/18/2020 Minute Order (7:09 AM) (Judicial Officer: Bell, Linda Marie)
Minute Order - No Hearing Held;
Journal Entry Details:
As this case involves an election matter, per Administrative Order 20-21 this matter shall been
randomly reassigned to one of the designated election judges. CLERK'S NOTE: The above
minute order has been distributed to all registered parties via Odyssey File and Serve.;
11/19/2020 Minute Order (12:02 PM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)

Minute Order: Court's Disclosure
The Court discloses that Mr. Miller is an attorney who appears before this Department. The
Court does not believe there is a basis for recusal but makes the disclosure in an abundance of
caution. CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this minute order was distributed via electronic mail. / dr
11-19-20;
11/20/2020 Telephonic Conference (3:00 PM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)

Telephonic Conference at Request of Court
Matter Heard;
Mark Hutchensen, Esq. also present. Upon Court's inquiry, Mr. Schrager advised he would file
an Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Monday or
Tuesday and would immediately serve Ms. Miller with the same. Court inquired as to whether
counsel needed to do any discovery or obtain any records. Mr. Gentile advised Plaintiff needed
to take the Deposition of Joseph Gloria and obtain the documents that Mr. Gloria described as
"discrepancies." Ms. Miller indicated she believed the matter could be resolved on legal
matters. Court inquired as to whether there was a factual question of fraudulent ballots. Ms.
Miller indicated there were 2 people who voted 2 times and the other issues were clerical
errors; therefore she did not believe there were significant allegations regarding fraud.
Plaintiff's counsel agreed. Court advised the Court would allow Plaintiff's to take the
deposition of Mr. Gloria primarily regarding the legal issue since parties agreed that there was
no real issue of fraud. Court advised the deposition was limited to 3 hours and the deposition
could be taken while Plaintiff's Motion was pending. Ms. Miller Stipulated to the Board of
Commissioners not moving forward and advised parties could brief the matter on the merits

CASE SUMMARY
CASE NO. A-20-824971-W
and take Mr. Gloria's deposition. COURT ORDERED, Status Check SET to review briefs and
set a hearing if necessary. Mark Hutchinson, Esq. appeared and requested he be allowed to
intervene on behalf of Stavros Anthony. Mr. Gentile indicated he may have an objection to the
intervention. Court advised the Court would allow Mr. Hutchinson to Intervene. Court advised
Mr. Hutchinson of the proceedings he missed. Upon Mr. Schrager's inquiry, Mr. Hutchinson
advised he was agreeable to join in the Stipulation presented by Ms. Miller, that the Board of
Commissioners would not move forward, parties would brief the matter on the merits, and
Plaintiff would take Mr. Gloria's deposition. Court advised the Court would review the briefs
in Chambers on 12/04/20 and decide whether a hearing was necessary. 12/04/20 STATUS
CHECK: REVIEW BRIEFING/SCHEDULE HEARING (CHAMBERS);
11/30/2020 Preliminary Injunction Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ON AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
BEFORE TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
Denied;
Parties appeared by telephone. Following arguments by Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Schrager, and
Ms. Miller, COURT ORDERED, the motion for preliminary injunction and temporary
restraining order is DENIED; it is clear under NRS 293.465 in which an election could have
been prvented, including a natural disaster or an accident suffered by the vehicle transmitting
the ballots; there are lots of ways in which an election could have been prevented; despite the
139 discrepancies, that does mean any election was prevented in any district; the affidavit
does not fall within the scope of NRS 293.465; for that reason, the Court will NOT ENJOIN
the Clark County Commission from addressing what is appropriate for it to do. The Friday,
December 4, 2020 status check in chambers on the writ of prohibition STANDS; the Court will
await remaining briefs. Mr. Schrager to prepare today's order, running it by opposing counsel
prior to submission. Mr. Schrager advised a stipulation and order on scheduling was
submitted and it is their request that the status check be vacated; they had a little trouble
scheduling Mr. Gloria's deposition, and they do not want to file briefds without it. Court,
noting the deadline, stated it is aware; if briefs are all submitted the Court will issue a minute
order; if not, then the Court will wait for them.;
12/04/2020 Status Check (3:00 AM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)

12/04/2020, 12/11/2020, 12/18/2020
Status Check: Review Briefs/Schedule Hearing
Matter Continued;
Matter Continued;
Matter Continued;
Matter Continued;
COURT ORDERED, matter CONTINUED for one week. 12-18-20 CHAMBERS STATUS
CHECK: REVIEW BRIEFS / SCHEDULE HEARING...PETITION FOR WRITS OF
MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this minute order was
distributed via Odyssey File and Serve. / dr 12-14-20;
Matter Continued;
Matter Continued;
COURT ORDERED, matter CONTINUED for one week. ...12-11-20 - CHAMBERS CLERK'S
NOTE: A copy of this minute order was distributed via Odyssey File and Serve. / dr 12-8-20;
12/18/2020 Petition for Writ of Mandamus (3:00 AM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)
Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition
Per Stip and Order signed 12/07/20
Denied;
12/18/2020 All Pending Motions (3:00 AM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)
PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION...STATUS CHECK: REVIEW

CASE SUMMARY
CASE NO. A-20-824971-W
BRIEFS/SCHEDULE HEARING The Court, having reviewed the Petition for Writ of
mandamus and the related briefing and being fully informed, DENIES the petition. NRS
293.465 cannot apply here, because the election was not prevented. Counsel for the County is
directed to submit a proposed order approved by opposing counsel consistent with the
foregoing within ten (10) days and distribute a filed copy to all parties involved in this matter.
Such order should set forth a synopsis of the supporting reasons proffered to the Court in
briefing. This Decision sets forth the Court's intended disposition on the subject but anticipates
further order of the Court to make such disposition effective as an order or judgment.
CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this minute order was distributed via Odyssey File and Serve. / dr
12-24-20 ;
DATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Intervenor Plaintiff Anthony, Stavros

Total Charges 294.00
Total Payments and Credits 294.00
Balance Due as of 1/4/2021 0.00
Intervenor Defendant Miller, Ross

Total Charges 720.00
Total Payments and Credits 720.00
Balance Due as of 1/4/2021 0.00

CASE NO: A-20-824971-W
Department 31

12/4/2020 4:33 AM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT
1 ORDR
MARK A. HUTCHISON, ESQ.
2 Nevada Bar No. 4639
JACOB REYNOLDS, ESQ.
PIERS TUELLER, ESQ.
10080 w. Alta Dr., #200
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Intervenor-Plaintiff,
6 Stavros Anthony

9 IN AND FOR CLARK CITY, STATE OF NEVADA
10 ROSS MILLER, and individual, Case No. A-20-824971-W
11 Plaintiff/Petitioner, Dept. 11 XI
12 vs.
ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR’S
13 CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
COMMISSIONERS, a local government INJUNCTION
14 entity; and DOES I-X, inclusive,
15 Defendant.
_____________________________________
16
17 STAVROS ANTHONY, an individual,
18 Intervenor-Plaintiff.
19 vs.
20 CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF
21 COMMISSIONERS, a local government

entity; ROSS MILLER, an individual, and
DOES I-X, inclusive,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25 On November 25, 2020, Intervenor-Plaintiff Stavros Anthony (“Intervenor”), by

26 and through counsel of record, filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion for
27 Preliminary Injunction”). Intervenor requested an order enjoining the Clark County
28
-1-

1 Commission from certifying the election of Clark County Commission, District C, or
2 otherwise reconsidering its vote to hold a new election for District C at its December 1,
3 2020 meeting or thereafter until this Court has ruled on the merits of this case.
4 On November 30, 2020, an opposition to Intervenor’ Motion for Preliminary

5 Injunction was filed by Plaintiff Ross Miller (“Plaintiff”), and Intervenor filed a reply.
6 The Court held a hearing on November 30, 2020. The hearing was conducted by
7 teleconference. Mark A. Hutchison, Esq., appeared and argued on behalf of Intervenor.
8 Bradley S. Schrager, Esq. appeared Plaintiff. Mary-Anne Miller, Esq., appeared argued on
9 behalf of Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners (“Defendant” or the “Board”).
10 Upon review of the papers and pleadings on file herein, the arguments of counsel,
11 and good cause appearing,
12 Intervenor’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.

13
December 3, 2020
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
_____________________________
16 DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
17
Submitted by
18
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN
19
20
21 MARK A. HUTCHISON, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 4639
22 JACOB REYNOLDS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10199
23 PIERS TUELLER, ESQ.
24 10080 w. Alta Dr., #200
25 Attorneys for Intervenor-Plaintiff,
Stavros Anthony
26
27
28
-2-
ORDER
12/29/2020 4:24 PM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT
1 NEOJ
DOMINIC P. GENTILE
JOHN A. HUNT
CLARK HILL PLLC
4 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., #500

Tel: (702) 862-8300/Fax: (702) 862-8400
6 [email protected]
[email protected]
7
BRADLEY S. SCHRAGER, ESQ.
9 DANIEL BRAVO, ESQ.

10 WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO,
SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP
11 3556 E. Russell Road, Second Floor
12
(702) 341-5200/Fax: (702) 341-5300
13 [email protected]
[email protected]
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Petitioner Ross Miller
15
16
IN AND FOR CLARK CITY, STATE OF NEVADA
17
18 ROSS MILLER, and individual, Case No.: A-20-824971-W

Dept. No.: 11
19 Plaintiff/Petitioner,
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
20 vs. DENYING INTERVENOR MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COMMISSIONERS, a local government
23 Defendant.
25 Intervenor-Plaintiff,
26 vs.
28 entity; ROSS MILLER, an individual; and
NOTICE OF ENTRY ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1 DOES I-X, inclusive,
2 Defendants.
3
4 TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

5 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR MOTION FOR
6 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION was signed by the Judge on the 3rd day of December, 2020 and
7 filed with the Eighth Judicial District Court on December 4, 2020, a true and correct copy of
8 which is attached hereto.
9
DATED this 29th day of December, 2020
10
11
12 By: /s/ Bradley S. Schrager

DOMINIC P. GENTILE
JOHN A. HUNT
CLARK HILL PLLC
16
17
18 DANIEL BRAVO, ESQ.
19 WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO,
SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP
21
22 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Petitioner Ross Miller
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2 I hereby certify that on this 29th day of December, 2020, a true and correct copy
3 of NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR MOTION FOR
4 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION was served by electronically filing with the Clerk of the Court
5 using the Odyssey eFileNV system and serving all parties with an email-address on record,
6 pursuant to Administrative Order 14-2 and Rule 9 of the N.E.F.C.R.
7 By /s/ Christie Rehfeld

Christie Rehfeld, an Employee of
8 WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN &
RABKIN, LLP
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
12/4/2020 4:33 AM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT
1 ORDR
MARK A. HUTCHISON, ESQ.
JACOB REYNOLDS, ESQ.
PIERS TUELLER, ESQ.
10080 w. Alta Dr., #200
Attorneys for Intervenor-Plaintiff,
6 Stavros Anthony

10 ROSS MILLER, and individual, Case No. A-20-824971-W
11 Plaintiff/Petitioner, Dept. 11 XI
12 vs.
ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR’S
13 CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
COMMISSIONERS, a local government INJUNCTION
15 Defendant.
_____________________________________
16
18 Intervenor-Plaintiff.
19 vs.

entity; ROSS MILLER, an individual, and
22
Defendant.
23
24
25 On November 25, 2020, Intervenor-Plaintiff Stavros Anthony (“Intervenor”), by

26 and through counsel of record, filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion for
27 Preliminary Injunction”). Intervenor requested an order enjoining the Clark County
28
-1-

1 Commission from certifying the election of Clark County Commission, District C, or
2 otherwise reconsidering its vote to hold a new election for District C at its December 1,
3 2020 meeting or thereafter until this Court has ruled on the merits of this case.
4 On November 30, 2020, an opposition to Intervenor’ Motion for Preliminary

5 Injunction was filed by Plaintiff Ross Miller (“Plaintiff”), and Intervenor filed a reply.
6 The Court held a hearing on November 30, 2020. The hearing was conducted by
7 teleconference. Mark A. Hutchison, Esq., appeared and argued on behalf of Intervenor.
8 Bradley S. Schrager, Esq. appeared Plaintiff. Mary-Anne Miller, Esq., appeared argued on
9 behalf of Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners (“Defendant” or the “Board”).
10 Upon review of the papers and pleadings on file herein, the arguments of counsel,
11 and good cause appearing,
12 Intervenor’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.

13
December 3, 2020
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
_____________________________
17
Submitted by
18
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN
19
20
21 MARK A. HUTCHISON, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 4639
22 JACOB REYNOLDS, ESQ.
23 PIERS TUELLER, ESQ.
24 10080 w. Alta Dr., #200
25 Attorneys for Intervenor-Plaintiff,
Stavros Anthony
26
27
28
-2-
ORDER
12/31/2020 1:07 PM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT
1 ORDR
2
3
4
IN AND FOR CLARK CITY, STATE OF NEVADA
5
ROSS MILLER, an individual, Case No.: A-20-824971-W
6 Dept. No.: XI
Plaintiff/Petitioner,
7 ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR
vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
8 WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF REQUIRING THE CLARK
9 COMMISSIONERS, a local government COUNTY BOARD OF
entity; and DOES I-X, inclusive, COMMISSIONERS TO ORDER A
10 NEW ELECTION FOR CLARK
Defendant. COUNTY COMMISSION
11 DISTRICT C
12
Intervenor-Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
entity; ROSS MILLER, an individual; and
17 Defendants.
18
On December 10, 2020, Intervenor-Plaintiff Stavros Anthony (“Intervenor”), by and
19
through counsel of record, filed a Motion for Writ of Mandamus (“Motion for Writ of
20
Mandamus”). Intervenor requested an order requiring the Clark County Board of
21
Commissioners (the “Board”) to order a new election for Clark County Commission District
22
C.
23
On December 14, 2020, an opposition to Intervenor’ Motion for Writ of Mandamus
24
was filed by Plaintiff Ross Miller (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Clark County Board of
25
Commissioners filed a joinder thereto. On December 16, 2020, Intervenor filed a reply in
26
support of his Motion for Writ of Mandamus.
27
...
28
1 of 3
ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

1 ...
2 Upon review of the papers and pleadings on file herein, the arguments of the parties,
3 and good cause appearing, Intervenor’ Motion for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Court
4 finds the following facts and states the following conclusions of law1 as follows:
5 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
6 Intervenor, in his Motion for Writ of Mandamus, argues that pursuant to NRS
7 293.465, the Clark County Board of Commissioners is required to proceed with a new
8 election for Clark County Commission, District C. Intervenor’s Motion for Writ of
9 Mandamus included an affidavit by the Clark County Registrar of Voters (the “Registrar’),
10 which states that there were 139 discrepancies in the District C election.
11 The Court finds that NRS 293.465 does not apply in this case. NRS 293.465 states in
12 full:
13 If an election is prevented in any precinct or district by reason of the loss or
destruction of the ballots intended for that precinct, or any other cause, the
14 appropriate election officers in that precinct or district shall make an affidavit
setting forth that fact and transmit it to the appropriate board of county
15 commissioners. Upon receipt of the affidavit and upon the application of any
candidate for any office to be voted for by the registered voters of that
16 precinct or district, the board of county commissioners shall order a new
election in that precinct or district.
17
18 NRS 293.465 applies in instances in which an election, or a portion of one, is prevented from
19 occurring, for instance due to a natural disaster, or an accident suffered by the vehicle
20 transmitting the ballots, or some similar incident preventing an election from occurring and
21 makes provision for a new election in those circumstances. The Court finds that NRS
22 293.465 cannot apply here because the Clark County Commission, District C election was
23 not prevented. Clark County had an election on November 3, 2020. The results of every race
24 have been canvassed and certified. No precinct failed to complete its election.
25 The Court further finds that the Registrar’s affidavit is not an NRS 293.465 affidavit,
26 either by its own terms—as the Court has already stated when denying Intervenor’s Motion
27
1
If any finding herein is in truth a conclusion of law, or if any conclusion is stated is in truth a
28 finding of fact, it shall be deemed so.
2 of 3
1 for Preliminary Injunction—or by the expressed intentions of the Registrar. The affidavit
2 does not declare that an election was prevented, either in whole or at the level of any
3 particular precinct. It does not describe or identify any “loss or destruction of the ballots” per
4 NRS 293.465. Therefore, Intervenor cannot establish that NRS 293.465 mandates a new
5 election.
6 THEREFORE, the Court DENIES Intervenor’ Motion for Writ of Mandamus.
7 DATED this 31st day of December, 2020.
8
9 ________________________________
10
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12 Submitted by:
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
13 STEVEN B. WOLFSON (SBN 1565)
District Attorney
14 By: /s/ Jacob A. Reynolds
By: /s/ Mary-Anne Miller MARK A. HUTCHISON (SBN 4639)
15 MARY-ANNE MILLER (SBN 1419) JACOB A. REYNOLDS (SBN
County Counsel 10199)
16 500 South Grand Central Pkwy. PIERS R. TUELLER (SBN14633)
Las Vegas, Nevada 89155-2215 Peccole Professional Park
17 10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
Attorneys for Defendant Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
18 Clark County Board of
Commissioners Attorneys for Intervenor-Plaintiff
19 Stavros Anthony
Approved by:
20
CLARK HILL PLLC
21
DOMINIC P. GENTILE (SBN 1923)
22 JOHN A. HUNT (SBN 1888)
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., #500
24
WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN
& RABKIN, LLP
26 (SBN 10217)
DANIEL BRAVO, ESQ. (SBN 13078)
28
3 of 3
12/31/2020 2:11 PM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT
1 NOE
4 ROSS MILLER, an individual, Case No.: A-20-824971-W
Dept. No.: 11
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
6 vs. DENYING INTERVENOR
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
7 CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS
COMMISSIONERS, a local government REQUIRING THE CLARK
8 entity; and DOES I-X, inclusive, COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS TO ORDER A
9 Defendant. NEW ELECTION FOR CLARK
COUNTY COMMISSION
10 DISTRICT C
11
Intervenor-Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
entity; ROSS MILLER, an individual; and
16 Defendants.
17 TO: THE ABOVE NAMED PARTIES:
18 YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that an Order Denying Intervenor Plaintiff’s
19 Motion For Writ Of Mandamus Requiring The Clark County Board Of Commissioner To
20 Order A New Election For Clark County Commission District C was filed above-entitled
21 matter on the 31st day of December, 2020, a copy of which is attached hereto.
22 DATED this 31st day of December, 2020.
23 STEVEN B. WOLFSON
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
24
25 By: /s/ Mary-Anne Miller

MARY-ANNE MILLER, County Counsel
26 State Bar No. 001419
500 South Grand Central Pkwy. 5th Flr.
27 Las Vegas, Nevada 89155-2215
Attorneys for Defendant
28 Clark County Board of Commissioners
1 of 2
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

1 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE
2 I hereby certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Clark County District
3 Attorney and that on this 31ST day of December, 2020, I served a true and correct copy of the
4 foregoing NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR PLAINTIFF’S
5 MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS REQUIRING THE CLARK COUNTY BOARD
6 OF COMMISSIONERS TO ORDER A NEW ELECTION FOR CLARK COUNTY
7 COMMISSION DISTRICT C (United States District Court Pacer System or the Eighth
8 Judicial District Wiznet), by e-mailing the same to the following recipients. Service of the
9 foregoing document by e-mail is in place of service via the United States Postal Service.
10 Dominic P. Gentile, Esq. MARK A. HUTCHISON (SBN 4639)
CLARK HILL PLLC JACOB A. REYNOLDS (SBN 10199)
11 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., #500 PIERS R. TUELLER (SBN14633)
Las Vegas, NV 89169 HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
12 [email protected] Peccole Professional Park
10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
13 Bradley S. Schrager, Esq. Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Daniel Bravo, Esq.
14 WOLF RIFKIN SHAPIRO SCHULMAN Attorneys for Intervenor-Plaintiff
& RABKIN LLP Stavros Anthony
15 3556 E. Russell Road, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89120
16 [email protected]
[email protected]
17
Attorneys for Plaintiff
18 Ross Miller
19
20
21
22 /s/ Afeni Banks

An Employee of the Clark County District
23 Attorney’s Office – Civil Division
24
25
26
27
28
2 of 2
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
1 ODM
4 ROSS MILLER, an individual, Case No.: A-20-824971-W
Dept. No.: 11
ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR
6 vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
7 CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF REQUIRING THE CLARK
COMMISSIONERS, a local government COUNTY BOARD OF
8 entity; and DOES I-X, inclusive, COMMISSIONERS TO ORDER A
NEW ELECTION FOR CLARK
9 Defendant. COUNTY COMMISSION
DISTRICT C
11 Intervenor-Plaintiff,
12 vs.

14 entity; ROSS MILLER, an individual; and
15
Defendants.
16
17 On December 10, 2020, Intervenor-Plaintiff Stavros Anthony (“Intervenor”), by and
18 through counsel of record, filed a Motion for Writ of Mandamus (“Motion for Writ of
19 Mandamus”). Intervenor requested an order requiring the Clark County Board of
20 Commissioners (the “Board”) to order a new election for Clark County Commission District
21 C.
22 On December 14, 2020, an opposition to Intervenor’ Motion for Writ of Mandamus
23 was filed by Plaintiff Ross Miller (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Clark County Board of
24 Commissioners filed a joinder thereto. On December 16, 2020, Intervenor filed a reply in
25 support of his Motion for Writ of Mandamus.
26 ...
27 ...
28
1 of 3
1 Upon review of the papers and pleadings on file herein, the arguments of the parties,
2 and good cause appearing, Intervenor’ Motion for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Court
3 finds the following facts and states the following conclusions of law1 as follows:
4 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
5 Intervenor, in his Motion for Writ of Mandamus, argues that pursuant to NRS 293.465,
6 the Clark County Board of Commissioners is required to proceed with a new election for Clark
7 County Commission, District C. Intervenor’s Motion for Writ of Mandamus included an
8 affidavit by the Clark County Registrar of Voters (the “Registrar’), which states that there
9 were 139 discrepancies in the District C election.
10 The Court finds that NRS 293.465 does not apply in this case. NRS 293.465 states in
11 full:
12 If an election is prevented in any precinct or district by reason of the loss or
destruction of the ballots intended for that precinct, or any other cause, the
13 appropriate election officers in that precinct or district shall make an affidavit
setting forth that fact and transmit it to the appropriate board of county
14 commissioners. Upon receipt of the affidavit and upon the application of any
candidate for any office to be voted for by the registered voters of that precinct
15 or district, the board of county commissioners shall order a new election in that
precinct or district.
16
17 NRS 293.465 applies in instances in which an election, or a portion of one, is prevented from
18 occurring, for instance due to a natural disaster, or an accident suffered by the vehicle
19 transmitting the ballots, or some similar incident preventing an election from occurring and
20 makes provision for a new election in those circumstances. The Court finds that NRS 293.465
21 cannot apply here because the Clark County Commission, District C election was not
22 prevented. Clark County had an election on November 3, 2020. The results of every race have
23 been canvassed and certified. No precinct failed to complete its election.
24 The Court further finds that the Registrar’s affidavit is not an NRS 293.465 affidavit,
25 either by its own terms—as the Court has already stated when denying Intervenor’s Motion
26 for Preliminary Injunction—or by the expressed intentions of the Registrar. The affidavit does
27
1
If any finding herein is in truth a conclusion of law, or if any conclusion is stated is in truth a
28 finding of fact, it shall be deemed so.
2 of 3
1 not declare that an election was prevented, either in whole or at the level of any particular
2 precinct. It does not describe or identify any “loss or destruction of the ballots” per NRS
3 293.465. Therefore, Intervenor cannot establish that NRS 293.465 mandates a new election.
4 THEREFORE, the Court DENIES Intervenor’ Motion for Writ of Mandamus.
5 DATED this ______ day of _______________, 202_.
6
________________________________
8
9 Submitted by: Approved by:
10 STEVEN B. WOLFSON (SBN 1565) HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC

District Attorney
11
By: /s/ Mary-Anne Miller By: /s/ Jacob A. Reynolds
12 MARY-ANNE MILLER (SBN 1419) MARK A. HUTCHISON (SBN 4639)
County Counsel JACOB A. REYNOLDS (SBN
13 500 South Grand Central Pkwy. 10199)
Las Vegas, Nevada 89155-2215 PIERS R. TUELLER (SBN14633)
14 Peccole Professional Park
Attorneys for Defendant 10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
15 Clark County Board of Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Commissioners
Attorneys for Intervenor-Plaintiff
16 Approved by: Stavros Anthony
17 CLARK HILL PLLC
18 DOMINIC P. GENTILE (SBN 1923)
JOHN A. HUNT (SBN 1888)
20
WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN
21 & RABKIN, LLP
23 (SBN 10217)
DANIEL BRAVO, ESQ. (SBN 13078)
25
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Petitioner
26 Ross Miller
27
28
3 of 3
A‐20‐824971‐W
DISTRICT COURT
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
Other Civil Matters COURT MINUTES November 18, 2020
A-20-824971-W Ross Miller, Plaintiff(s)

vs.
Clark County Board of Commissioners, Defendant(s)
November 18, 2020 7:09 AM Minute Order
HEARD BY: Bell, Linda Marie COURTROOM: No Location
COURT CLERK: Michelle Jones
RECORDER:
REPORTER:
PARTIES
PRESENT:
JOURNAL ENTRIES
- As this case involves an election matter, per Administrative Order 20-21 this matter shall been
randomly reassigned to one of the designated election judges.
CLERK'S NOTE: The above minute order has been distributed to all registered parties via Odyssey
File and Serve.
PRINT DATE: 01/04/2021 Page 1 of 9 Minutes Date: November 18, 2020

A‐20‐824971‐W
DISTRICT COURT

vs.
November 19, 2020 12:02 AM Minute Order
HEARD BY: Gonzalez, Elizabeth COURTROOM: Chambers
COURT CLERK: Dulce Romea
RECORDER:
REPORTER:
PARTIES
PRESENT:
JOURNAL ENTRIES
- The Court discloses that Mr. Miller is an attorney who appears before this Department. The Court
does not believe there is a basis for recusal but makes the disclosure in an abundance of caution.
CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this minute order was distributed via electronic mail. / dr 11-19-20

A‐20‐824971‐W
DISTRICT COURT

vs.
November 20, 2020 3:00 PM Telephonic Conference
HEARD BY: Gonzalez, Elizabeth COURTROOM: RJC Courtroom 03E
COURT CLERK: Lauren Kidd
RECORDER: Jill Hawkins
REPORTER:
PARTIES
PRESENT: Gentile, Dominic P. Attorney
Miller, Mary-Anne Meyers Attorney
Schrager, Bradley S. Attorney
JOURNAL ENTRIES
- Mark Hutchensen, Esq. also present.
Upon Court's inquiry, Mr. Schrager advised he would file an Application for Temporary Restraining
Order and Preliminary Injunction by Monday or Tuesday and would immediately serve Ms. Miller
with the same. Court inquired as to whether counsel needed to do any discovery or obtain any
records. Mr. Gentile advised Plaintiff needed to take the Deposition of Joseph Gloria and obtain the
documents that Mr. Gloria described as "discrepancies." Ms. Miller indicated she believed the matter
could be resolved on legal matters. Court inquired as to whether there was a factual question of
fraudulent ballots. Ms. Miller indicated there were 2 people who voted 2 times and the other issues
were clerical errors; therefore she did not believe there were significant allegations regarding fraud.
Plaintiff's counsel agreed. Court advised the Court would allow Plaintiff's to take the deposition of
Mr. Gloria primarily regarding the legal issue since parties agreed that there was no real issue of
fraud. Court advised the deposition was limited to 3 hours and the deposition could be taken while
Plaintiff's Motion was pending. Ms. Miller Stipulated to the Board of Commissioners not moving
forward and advised parties could brief the matter on the merits and take Mr. Gloria's deposition.
COURT ORDERED, Status Check SET to review briefs and set a hearing if necessary. Mark

A‐20‐824971‐W
Hutchinson, Esq. appeared and requested he be allowed to intervene on behalf of Stavros Anthony.
Mr. Gentile indicated he may have an objection to the intervention. Court advised the Court would
allow Mr. Hutchinson to Intervene. Court advised Mr. Hutchinson of the proceedings he missed.
Upon Mr. Schrager's inquiry, Mr. Hutchinson advised he was agreeable to join in the Stipulation
presented by Ms. Miller, that the Board of Commissioners would not move forward, parties would
brief the matter on the merits, and Plaintiff would take Mr. Gloria's deposition. Court advised the
Court would review the briefs in Chambers on 12/04/20 and decide whether a hearing was
necessary.
12/04/20 STATUS CHECK: REVIEW BRIEFING/SCHEDULE HEARING (CHAMBERS)

A‐20‐824971‐W
DISTRICT COURT

vs.
November 30, 2020 1:00 PM Preliminary Injunction

Hearing
HEARD BY: Gonzalez, Elizabeth COURTROOM: RJC Courtroom 03E
RECORDER: Angelica Michaux
REPORTER:
PARTIES
PRESENT: Hutchison, Mark A Attorney
Miller, Mary-Anne Meyers Attorney
Reynolds, Jacob A, ESQ Attorney
Schrager, Bradley S. Attorney
Tueller, Piers R. Attorney
JOURNAL ENTRIES
- Parties appeared by telephone.
Following arguments by Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Schrager, and Ms. Miller, COURT ORDERED, the
motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order is DENIED; it is clear under NRS
293.465 in which an election could have been prvented, including a natural disaster or an accident
suffered by the vehicle transmitting the ballots; there are lots of ways in which an election could have
been prevented; despite the 139 discrepancies, that does mean any election was prevented in any
district; the affidavit does not fall within the scope of NRS 293.465; for that reason, the Court will
NOT ENJOIN the Clark County Commission from addressing what is appropriate for it to do. The
Friday, December 4, 2020 status check in chambers on the writ of prohibition STANDS; the Court will
await remaining briefs. Mr. Schrager to prepare today's order, running it by opposing counsel prior
to submission.

A‐20‐824971‐W
Mr. Schrager advised a stipulation and order on scheduling was submitted and it is their request that
the status check be vacated; they had a little trouble scheduling Mr. Gloria's deposition, and they do
not want to file briefds without it. Court, noting the deadline, stated it is aware; if briefs are all
submitted the Court will issue a minute order; if not, then the Court will wait for them.

A‐20‐824971‐W
DISTRICT COURT
Other Civil Matters COURT MINUTES December 04, 2020

vs.
December 04, 2020 3:00 AM Status Check
RECORDER:
REPORTER:
PARTIES
PRESENT:
JOURNAL ENTRIES
- COURT ORDERED, matter CONTINUED for one week.
...12-11-20 - CHAMBERS
CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this minute order was distributed via Odyssey File and Serve. / dr 12-8-
20

A‐20‐824971‐W
DISTRICT COURT

vs.
December 11, 2020 3:00 AM Status Check
RECORDER:
REPORTER:
PARTIES
PRESENT:
JOURNAL ENTRIES
- COURT ORDERED, matter CONTINUED for one week.
12-18-20 CHAMBERS STATUS CHECK: REVIEW BRIEFS / SCHEDULE

HEARING...PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
20

A‐20‐824971‐W
DISTRICT COURT

vs.
December 18, 2020 3:00 AM All Pending Motions
RECORDER:
REPORTER:
PARTIES
PRESENT:
JOURNAL ENTRIES
- PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION...STATUS CHECK: REVIEW

BRIEFS/SCHEDULE HEARING
The Court, having reviewed the Petition for Writ of mandamus and the related briefing and being
fully informed, DENIES the petition. NRS 293.465 cannot apply here, because the election was not
prevented. Counsel for the County is directed to submit a proposed order approved by opposing
counsel consistent with the foregoing within ten (10) days and distribute a filed copy to all parties
involved in this matter. Such order should set forth a synopsis of the supporting reasons proffered to
the Court in briefing. This Decision sets forth the Court's intended disposition on the subject but
anticipates further order of the Court to make such disposition effective as an order or judgment.
20

Certification of Copy
State of Nevada
SS:
County of Clark
I, Steven D. Grierson, the Clerk of the Court of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, State of
Nevada, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of the hereinafter stated
original document(s):
AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL; DISTRICT COURT DOCKET ENTRIES;
CIVIL COVER SHEET; ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION; NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
WRIT OF MANDAMUS REQUIRING THE CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO
ORDER A NEW ELECTION FOR CLARK COUNTY COMMISSION DISTRICT C; NOTICE OF
ENTRY OF ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR WRIT OF
MANDAMUS REQUIRING THE CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO ORDER A
NEW ELECTION FOR CLARK COUNTY COMMISSION DISTRICT C; DISTRICT COURT
MINUTES
ROSS MILLER,
Case No: A-20-824971-W
Plaintiff(s),
Dept No: XI
vs.

COMMISSIONERS,
Defendant(s),
STAVROS ANTHONY,
Intervenor Plaintiff(s),
vs.

COMMISSIONERS; ROSS MILLER,
Intervenor Defendant(s),
now on file and of record in this office.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto
Set my hand and Affixed the seal of the
Court at my office, Las Vegas, Nevada
This 4 day of January 2021.
Steven D. Grierson, Clerk of the Court
Heather Ungermann, Deputy Clerk

A-20-824971-W
A-20-824971-W

Electronically Filed Jan 04 2021 11:26 A.M. Elizabeth A. Brown Clerk of Supreme Court

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Electronically Filed Jan 04 2021 11:26 A.M. Elizabeth A. Brown Clerk of Supreme Court

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Electronically Filed Jan 04 2021 11:26 A.M. Elizabeth A. Brown Clerk of Supreme Court

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Electronically Filed

11 EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

Case Type: Other Civil Matters

DATE CASE ASSIGNMENT

Current Case Assignment

Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners Miller, Mary-Anne Meyers

Intervenor Clark County Board of Commissioners Miller, Mary-Anne Meyers

Miller, Ross Gentile, Dominic P.

Intervenor Anthony, Stavros Hutchison, Mark A

DATE EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT INDEX

11/17/2020 Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure

11/18/2020 Notice of Appearance

PAGE 1 OF 6 Printed on 01/04/2021 at 10:40 AM

11/18/2020 Notice of Department Reassignment

11/18/2020 Peremptory Challenge

11/18/2020 Acceptance of Service

11/18/2020 Notice of Appearance

11/18/2020 Notice of Department Reassignment

11/19/2020 Notice of Department Reassignment

11/20/2020 Media Request and Order

11/24/2020 Media Request and Order

11/24/2020 Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure

11/24/2020 Complaint in Intervention

11/25/2020 Order Shortening Time

11/30/2020 Reply in Support

12/01/2020 Stipulation and Order

PAGE 2 OF 6 Printed on 01/04/2021 at 10:40 AM

12/01/2020 First Amended Complaint

12/02/2020 Transcript of Proceedings

12/04/2020 Order Denying Motion

12/07/2020 Stipulation and Order

12/08/2020 Notice of Entry of Stipulation and Order

12/16/2020 Reply in Support

12/17/2020 Transcript of Proceedings

12/29/2020 Notice of Entry of Order

PAGE 3 OF 6 Printed on 01/04/2021 at 10:40 AM

12/29/2020 Notice of Appeal

12/29/2020 Case Appeal Statement

12/31/2020 Notice of Entry of Order

01/01/2021 Amended Notice of Appeal

11/19/2020 Minute Order (12:02 PM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)

11/20/2020 Telephonic Conference (3:00 PM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)

PAGE 4 OF 6 Printed on 01/04/2021 at 10:40 AM

12/04/2020 Status Check (3:00 AM) (Judicial Officer: Gonzalez, Elizabeth)

PAGE 5 OF 6 Printed on 01/04/2021 at 10:40 AM

Intervenor Plaintiff Anthony, Stavros

Intervenor Defendant Miller, Ross

PAGE 6 OF 6 Printed on 01/04/2021 at 10:40 AM

Case Number: A-20-824971-W

8 EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

17 STAVROS ANTHONY, an individual,

21 COMMISSIONERS, a local government

25 On November 25, 2020, Intervenor-Plaintiff Stavros Anthony (“Intervenor”), by

Case Number: A-20-824971-W

4 On November 30, 2020, an opposition to Intervenor’ Motion for Preliminary

9 behalf of Defendant Clark County Board of Commissioners (“Defendant” or the “Board”).

12 Intervenor’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.

21 MARK A. HUTCHISON, ESQ.

5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169