A ON Structural Analysis and Design of Academic Block (2X2 Rooms)
A ON Structural Analysis and Design of Academic Block (2X2 Rooms)
A ON Structural Analysis and Design of Academic Block (2X2 Rooms)
REPORT
ON
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
ACADEMIC BLOCK (2X2 ROOMS)
Prepared By
DB Multi Engineering Consultant Pvt. Ltd.
Kupandole, Lalitpur, Nepal
Submitted To
NOV, 2020
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This report comprises the summary of the design of Pre School Building.
The report consists of the design procedure adopted, assumptions made
and input and output from the design and analysis. It is assumed that the
Client will completely follow the Structural Design specified in the form
of Design Drawings attached in the report.
……………………………….
NAME: Dr. Suman Narsingh Rajbhandari
NEC NO: 265 Civil “A”
(STRUCTURE ENGINEER)
Table of Contents
1 Introduction.......................................................................................................1
1.1 General................................................................................................................1
1.2 Salient Features...................................................................................................1
1.2.1 Project Information..........................................................................................1
1.2.2 Building Features.............................................................................................1
1.2.3 Site Condition..................................................................................................3
1.3 General................................................................................................................3
1.4 Codes and Standard used.....................................................................................5
1.5 Software Used.....................................................................................................5
2 Analysis..............................................................................................................5
2.1 Material properties..............................................................................................5
2.1.1 Concrete...........................................................................................................5
2.1.2 Reinforcement Steel........................................................................................6
2.2 Section Properties................................................................................................6
2.3 Loadings..............................................................................................................6
2.3.1 Load Cases.......................................................................................................7
2.3.2 Load Combination...........................................................................................7
2.4 Estimation of Load..............................................................................................9
2.4.1 Unit Weight (Dead Load)................................................................................9
2.4.2 Live Load.......................................................................................................11
2.4.3 Seismic Load.................................................................................................12
3 Analysis Output...............................................................................................13
3.1 Seismic Coefficient Method..............................................................................13
3.1.1 Base Shear Calculation..................................................................................14
3.2 Storey Drift........................................................................................................14
3.3 Modal time period and mass participation........................................................15
3.4 Center of mass and rigidity...............................................................................15
4 Force Diagram.................................................................................................15
4.1 Axial Force Diagram.........................................................................................16
4.2 Shear Force Diagram.........................................................................................16
4.3 Moment Diagram..............................................................................................17
4.4 Joint Reactions..................................................................................................17
5 Design of Structural Members (Sample Design)..........................................18
5.1 Design Input and Output...................................................................................18
5.1.1 Section Input Diagram...................................................................................18
5.2 Design of Slab...................................................................................................21
5.3 Design of Beam and Column............................................................................22
5.3.1 Sample Beam Design.....................................................................................22
5.3.2 Sample Column Design.................................................................................23
5.4 Staircase Design................................................................................................26
5.5 Strong Column Weak Beam..............................................................................29
5.6 Design of Footing (Critical Footing).................................................................32
References...................................................................................................................34
List of Figure
The analysis and design has been based on IS codes that are in practice in Nepal. This
report consists of the design assumptions, design methodology, design inputs and
outputs, and sample design of structural members.
Location : ……………………
Ground Floor Area : 129.50 Sq.m
Total Height : 9m
1
Figure 1: Plan of Building
2
1.2.3 Site Condition
1.3 General
After completion of Architectural design, the layout of columns and beams are
done without affecting the Architectural functions of building so far. Structure is
modeled using finite element method. A three-dimensional beam element
having 12 DOF with 6 DOFs at each node were used for modeling beams and
columns in the building, while 24DOFs shell element with 6 DOFs at each node
were used to model slab wall.
The structure is analyzed by the linear elastic theory to calculate internal actions
produced by anticipated design loads. The analysis is carried out using state of
art three dimensional structural analysis programs like Staad ProV8i, ETABS
2015. The design loads considered as per the relevant codes of practice comprise
dead load due to permanent structures, live load due to occupancy of the
structure and seismic load due to anticipated earthquake possible at the proposed
location. A number of load combinations are considered to obtain the maximum
values of design stresses.
Following considerations is made during modeling, analysis and design.
3
Seismic loads were considered acting in the horizontal direction (along
either of the two orthogonal directions of building) and not along the
vertical direction, since it is not considered to be significant for design
of structural members suitable load combinations as suggested by IS
1893– 2002 are used.
Figure 3: 3D of Building
4
1.4 Codes and Standard used
For the structural analysis and design, the following codes and standard are
followed:
Among others, ETABS can do model generation, seismic and wind load
generation, finite element-based linear and non-linear static and dynamic
analysis, concrete frame design (column and beam) and shear wall design.
2 Analysis
2.1 Material properties
2.1.1 Concrete
Column is designed for M20 grade of concrete. And all other components of
plain and reinforced concrete unless specified in design are M20 grade.
5
Unit Weight = 25 KN/m3
The preliminary sizes of Beam, Column, and Slab were chosen based on
experience.
During the analysis, beam and column are modeled as frame elements whereas
slab loads are applied directly.
2.3 Loadings
The following considerations are made during the loading on the structural
model:
The loads distributed over the area are imposed on the area element and
the loads distributed over the length are imposed on the frame elements
whenever possible.
Where such loading is not possible, equivalent conversion to different
loading distribution is carried to load the model near the real case as far
as possible.
6
For lateral load, necessary calculations are performed to comply with the
requirements of IS 1893-2002.
Load
Load Name Description Unit Remarks
Type
Dead Dead Self-weight of the structure KN/m2
LIVE Live Imposed Load <3 KN/m On floor slab
LIVE 2 Live Imposed Load >3 KN/m2 On floor slab
2
Roof Live Live Roof Live KN/m On floor slab
WALL LOAD Dead Partition Wall Load KN/m On floor beams
FINISHES Dead Floor Finish Load KN/m2 On floor slab
EQX Seismic Seismic Coefficient IS1893 X+0.05Y
EQY Seismic Seismic Coefficient IS1893 Y+0.05X
1.5(DL + LL)
1.2(DL + LL ± EQ)
1.5(DL ± EQ)
0.9 DL ±1.5 EQ
1.2(DL + LL ± RS)
1.5(DL ± RS)
7
The following load combinations are used during analysis
S.
Name Type
N
1 1.5(DL + LL) 1.5(DL + LL)
2 1.2(DL + LL+ EQx) 1.2(DL + LL+ EQx)
3 1.2(DL + LL - EQx) 1.2(DL + LL - EQx)
4 1.2(DL + LL + EQy) 1.2(DL + LL + EQy)
5 1.2(DL + LL - EQy) 1.2(DL + LL - EQy)
6 1.5(DL + EQx) 1.5(DL + EQx)
7 1.5(DL - EQx) 1.5(DL - EQx)
8 1.5(DL + EQy) 1.5(DL + EQy)
9 1.5(DL - EQy) 1.5(DL - EQy)
10 0.9DL + 1.5EQx 0.9DL + 1.5EQx
11 0.9DL - 1.5EQx 0.9DL - 1.5EQx
12 0.9DL + 1.5EQy 0.9DL + 1.5EQy
13 0.9DL - 1.5EQy 0.9DL - 1.5EQy
14 1.2(DL + LL+ RSx) 1.2(DL + LL+ RSx)
15 1.2(DL + LL - RSx) 1.2(DL + LL - RSx)
16 1.2(DL + LL + RSy) 1.2(DL + LL + RSy)
17 1.2(DL + LL - RSy) 1.2(DL + LL - RSy)
18 1.5(DL + RSx) 1.5(DL + RSx)
19 1.5(DL - RSx) 1.5(DL - RSx)
20 1.5(DL + RSy) 1.5(DL + RSy)
21 1.5(DL - RSy) 1.5(DL - RSy)
22 0.9DL + 1.5RSx 0.9DL + 1.5RSx
23 0.9DL - 1.5RSx 0.9DL - 1.5RSx
24 0.9DL + 1.5RSy 0.9DL + 1.5RSy
25 0.9DL - 1.5RSy 0.9DL - 1.5RSy
8
2.4 Estimation of Load
The loads on the building are based on Indian codes of Practices. The unit weight
of different structural and non-structural elements is derived from IS 875 Part 1
and presented in below.
The load calculations are based on actual measured drawings. The self-weight of
beams, columns and slabs are calculated by the program. Similarly, the imposed
loads are applied on the slab as area load in KN/m 2 and values of imposed loads
are tabulated below. The weight of infill walls is calculated and applied on beams
as line weight in KN/m.
Partition wall load are assigned as uniformly distributed area load in slab as
area load in KN/m2.
Floor finishing load are assigned as area load in slab.
Single type of Live load is assigned in each panel of slab.
A frame load is applied as parapet loading on the exterior frame of the roof
level.
The roof is assumed accessible and loaded with roof live load as per Indian
Standard, IS 875 -1987(part2) but this load is not considered during seismic
load.
9
Table 4: Dead Load Calculation
Unit Weights of
1 materials
Brick masonry 16.5 kN/m3
Screed 21 kN/m3
Mosaic 23.1 kN/m3
Marble 26.7 kN/m3
Reinforced Concrete 25 kN/m3
cement plaster 20.4 kN/m3
10
Figure 4: Frame Load (Wall Load)
To determine the seismic load, it is considered that the country lies in the
seismic zone V according to IS 1893:2002. The soil type is considered as soft
with 5% damping to determine average response acceleration. The building is
analyzed as moment resisting frame without consideration of infill wall.
Therefore the fundamental time period Tais obtained by using the following
formula:
The seismic weight is determined based on the following mass source. (Table
6, Cl.7.3.1, IS 1893 (Part 1):2002
11
Table 6: Mass Source for Seismic Load
3 Analysis Output
The analysis results are discussed in this chapter. Both seismic coefficient and
response spectrum methods are used. The major discussion are focused on the
eccentricity, storey shear, inter storey drift, maximum displacement and base
shear along two orthogonal directions. The column and beam size and
reinforcement are the designed for the maximum response.
X 0.44
Y 0.44
Z I S a 0.36 1.0 Sa
Ah = = x x
2 R g 2 5 g
12
3.1.1 Base Shear Calculation
Table 8: Base shear
Load Case/Combo FX FY Scale Factor
kN kN
EQX 369.224 0
EQY 0 369.224
RSX Max 350 26.35 1.87
RSY Max 31.21 365 2.22
TABLE: Storey
Drifts
Storey Load Case/Combo Item Drift
Storey3 EQX Max Drift X 0.00203
Storey3 EQY Max Drift Y 0.00197
Storey2 EQX Max Drift X 0.00243
Storey2 EQY Max Drift Y 0.00302
Storey1 EQX Max Drift X 0.00174
Storey1 EQY Max Drift Y 0.00206
It is seen that drift does not exceed the code prescribed value of 0.004 times
storey height Thus the drift check seems to comply with the safety value
mentioned in the code.
13
Perio Sum Sum
Case Mode d UX UY
sec
Modal 1 0.571 0.2375 0.3453
Modal 2 0.542 0.8203 0.5687
Modal 3 0.449 0.8394 0.8583
Modal 4 0.199 0.9404 0.8611
Modal 5 0.186 0.9446 0.9393
Modal 6 0.155 0.948 0.9522
Modal 7 0.143 0.9633 0.9815
Modal 8 0.131 0.9971 0.9937
Modal 9 0.113 1 1
TABLE: Centers of
Mass and Rigidity
Storey Diaphragm XCCM YCCM XCR YCR
m m m m
Storey1 D1 11.3918 4.9396 11.1343 3.9719
Storey2 D2 10.2968 4.8692 11.0222 4.0256
Storey3 D3 2.2582 4.4332 4.3914 3.9868
4 Force Diagram
The output of forces obtained from ETABS analysis for Envelope have
presented below as a sample only. The output forces are axial force, Shear force
and Moments.
14
4.1 Axial Force Diagram
15
4.3 Moment Diagram
16
5 Design of Structural Members (Sample Design)
5.1 Design Input and Output
5.1.1 Section Input Diagram
17
Figure 9: Section Input In Frame Along grid B-B
18
Design Output Diagram
19
Figure 12: Design Output in Frame along Grid 2-2
20
5.2 Design of Slab
5.2.1
21
5.3 Design of Beam and Column
5.3.1 Sample Beam Design
ETABS 2015 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
350 550 350 0 45 45
Material Properties
Lt.Wt Factor
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
(Unitless)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
22
Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-146.2283 37.3543 0 -183.5827
23
Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)
Length
Level Element Section ID Combo ID Station Loc LLRF
(mm)
M20C350X3
Storey1 C1 UDCon20 0 3900 0.797
50
Section Properties
Cover (Torsion)
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm)
(mm)
450 450 60 30
Material Properties
Lt.Wt Factor
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
(Unitless)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
24
Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear,
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vu2
Minor Shear,
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vu3
Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed
**Note: Refer Structure Drawings for Details
25
5.4 Staircase Design
Concrete Characteristic M
Strength 20 Pa
Width of M
Landing A, l1 1.5 m Tensile strength of Steel 500 Pa
Width of 0.4560
Landing B, l2 1.47 m x/d 90652
Projected
Length of Required Effective Depth 105.98 m
Flights, l2 1.8 m for Flight 96574 m
Projected
Height of 1.07
Flights,h 1 m
2.8369
b1 0.23 m A 02648
-
56521.
b2 3.96 m B 73913
115079
b3 2.13 m C 811.9
m
2302.0 m
b4 2.2 m Area of Steel 0217 2
b5 0.23 m
Check for Shear
Percent Tension 0.5749 M
Reinforcement 25617 Pa
Thickness of Permissible Shear Stress in 0.3249 M
Floor Finish 0.05 m Concrete for one way 85123 Pa
26
Density of kN/
Concrete 25 m3
density of Floor kN/ 0.1931 M Sa
Finish 20 m3 Maximum Shear Stress 0686 Pa fe
m
Diameter of Rebar 16 m
269.01 m
Dead Load of Flights Spacing 39705 m
0.57
Step Section 375 kN
1.26 Development Length
Inclined Slab 2859 kN Check
0.45 M
Finish 3 kN Design Bond Stress 1.2 pa
Total Dead Load 2.28 m
per flight 9609 kN Ld 906.25 m
Total per m2 on 7.63 kN/ 1488.3 m
plan 2032 m2 M1/V 57883 m
Live Load per kN/
m2 on Plan 4 m2
11.6 kN/
Total Load 3203 m2
17.4 kN/
Factored Load 4805 m2
Load for
assumed slab 53.7 kN/
width 3999 m2
m
Distribution Steel m
Requirements 480.48 2
Diameter of Transverse m
Landing A Rebar 10 m
Self Weight of kN/ 503.46 m
Slab 3.75 m2 Spacing 03612 m
kN/
Finish 1 m2
kN/
Live Load 4 m2
kN/
Total Load 8.75 m2 Landing Slab Design
13.1 kN/ 154.63
Factored Load 25 m2 Load 99737 kN
Load for
assumed slab 19.6 kN/
width 875 m2 L 8.52 m
B 1.5 m
27
Maximum Bending 164.69 kN Sa
Moment 1572 m fe
Depth check
Effective depth required 181.68 m
for Landing Slab, d 9292 m
Landing B
Self Weight of kN/ 5.8251
Slab 3.75 m2 A 0677
-
kN/ 56521.
Finish 1 m2 B 73913
kN/ 164691
Live Load 4 m2 C 572
m
kN/ m
Total Load 8.75 m2 Area of Steel #NUM! 2
13.1 kN/
Factored Load 25 m2
Load for
assumed slab 19.2 kN/ m
width 9375 m2 Diameter of Rebar 8 m
77.3
Ra 1999 kN
77.3
Rb 0505 kN Shear Check
77.319
Load 98686 kN
SFD
77.3
0 1999 kN
47.7
1.5 8874 kN
0.3965 M Sa
2.389258 0 kN Shear Stress 12753 pa fe
-
48.9
3.3 432 kN
- m
77.3 m
4.77 051 kN Transverse Reinforcement 234 2
Diameter of Transverse m
Rebar 8 m
322.21 m
BMD Spacing 46311 m
28
kN
0 0 m
93.8 kN
1.5 3154 m
115. kN
2.389258 0798 m
92.7 kN
3.3 9249 m
kN
4.77 0 m
Material Characteristics:
Section Characteristics:
d'
D = 0.06 ≈ 0.1 for all Column
, Pu =1411 KN
Then,
29
pu
=
f ck 0.11
Pu
f ck ∗b∗D = 0.196
Mu
2
From chart f ck ∗b∗D = 0.18 ,chart (48) ,
Then,
LOWER COLUMN
Pu = 1780 KN
pu
=
f ck 0.11
Pu
f ck ∗b∗D = 0.247
Mu
M uv=734.4KN-M
TOTAL MOMENT=(777.6+734.4)KN-M=1512KN-m
30
Beam of ground floor
Left beam
Concrete Grade = M20 (fck = 20 N/mm2)
Moment = 213KN-M
Right beam
Width of Beam (bw) = 300 mm
33
Adopted Total depth 450 mm
Length and breadth of Footing 3.2 m
Adopted Bars 12 15 C/
@
0 C
References
[1]IS 456- 2000 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete
[2]IS 875-1987 Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for
buildings and structures
[9]ETABS manual V 13
34