The Power of Stupidity: Chapter 2 - Stupidity and Biology
The Power of Stupidity: Chapter 2 - Stupidity and Biology
The Power of Stupidity: Chapter 2 - Stupidity and Biology
by Giancarlo Livraghi
* * *
It could be long and complicated to get into the scientific debate (often
pointless, but sometimes enlightening) on the intelligence of biology or the
biology of intelligence. One can argue, depending on the point of view, that
evolution is intelligent – or stupid. And the same contradictions can be found
in the study of human cultures.
On this subject there is another interesting observation by James Welles.
Archeology is mainly dedicated to searching for intelligence. That is, what
since the origin of our species makes homo sapiens different from other
humanoids that (according to our criteria) appear to have lesser thinking
ability. Or, in not so remote times, finding facts that show “progress” –
improvement in technique, science or social organization. History, on the
other hand, is an inexhaustible collection of errors and failures – an endless
celebration of the power of stupidity.
Another observation by the same author is the ambivalence of cultural
heritage. Tradition is a buildup of experience and useful “know how.”
But it is also sclerotic rigidity of prejudice, superstition, habit, dogmatism,
constrictions, obedience, that hinder knowledge and are often the roots
of human stupidity.
Not only in philosophical and scientific evolution, but also in everyday
life, we are often faced with a choice. What must we keep of our knowledge
from experience and what should we learn from new stimuli – or from things
that we already know, but we haven’t yet understood as well as we could?
We need to do both, whenever we have an opportunity. There is a lot that
we can learn by combining experience with curiosity.
Recent studies in paleoanthropology help us to understand that at the
origin of our species, in the most “primitive” human cultures, there were
coherent and cohesive social structures. 1 There are values, deeply rooted
in human nature, that can quite effectively reduce stupidity and counteract
its effects. The problem is how to find them and make them work in the
turbulences and complexities of today.
2
1
See The Evolution of Evolution gandalf.it/stupid/darwin.htm
It would be far too complicated, very long, and somewhat boring,
to get into a discussion on the nature of intelligence. Theoretical debates
are endlessly complicated and often inconclusive. But one fact is relevant:
it makes no sense to define intelligence as only linear or logic – and it’s
equally wrong to discard as stupid what doesn’t seem to be fully explained
by rational thinking.
Reason and emotion, logic and intuition can’t be separated. Great steps
in knowledge (and science) were made by intuitive perceptions that only
later found a precise “rational” explanation. Also daily experience proves
that intuition can be faster, and more effective, than too much reasoning.
We can be stupid if we allow ourselves to be led only by emotion,
but we are not very bright if we think that all problems can be solved
following an apparently logical sequence. This is one of the reasons why,
at the end of this book, there are some “informal” observations on how
to simplify complexity.