THE EARTH AS AN OBJECT OF ASTROPHYSICAL INTEREST IN THE

SEARCH FOR EXTRASOLAR PLANETS

M. VÁZQUEZ
Instituto de Astrofı́sica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Spain
P. MONTAÑÉS RODRIGUEZ
Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 40386 North Shore
Lane, Big Bear City, 92314 CA, USA
E. PALLE
Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 40386 North Shore
Lane, Big Bear City, 92314 CA, USA

Abstract: The potential discovery of Earth-like planets around other stars will
need, apart from a sophisticated technological development, the design of techniques
for identifying the most representative parameters of their atmospheres and surfaces.
The search for life will constitutes the holy grail of this search. However, for many
decades the observations will provide data with low spatial and spectral resolution.
In the meantime, the Earth will be for us a sort of Rosetta stone to interpret the
exoplanet’s spectra. Here we present a review of the main results of simulations and
observations looking at our planet with nil or low resolution. In other words, we will
study “The Earth seen as a Exoplanet”.

1 Introduction
1.1 The Earth System
The study of our planet has been classically divided between different branches cover-
ing distinct layers and processes (geology, meteorology and climatology, for example).
Step by step the need to understand the Earth as a global system has emerged. A
synergistic and interdisciplinary action is necessary for this purpose,which constitutes
the core of the Earth system sciences.
The Earth system is powered by the Sun, that drives the chemical and physical
processes in our atmosphere. The system is also powered by the Earth’s interior,
manifested in events such as volcanic eruptions.
The study of the Earth system as a whole has two main applications. First, the
evaluation of climate change with special attention to the recent global warming [1]
and second the search of terrestrial planets around other stars. We will concentrate
our study here on the latter.

1
1.2 The Earth-Exoplanets Connection
In the 1980s the observation of “The Sun as a Star” provided the role of the Rosetta
stone to interpret the observations of sun-like stars differing in mass, age and level
of magnetic activity [2]. This solar-stellar connection had, and has, a double avenue,
because the stellar observations also contributed to a better understanding of the
solar magnetism. In a similar way, we expect that observations of “The Earth as
a Planet” will provide the key to understand the future observations of earth-like
exoplanets.
Our Solar System contains four terrestrial planets, and three of them posses a
thin atmosphere. Only one, the Earth, has an atmosphere with an important amount
of oxygen coexisting with methane, a pair that indicates an essential property of our
planet: life. Living beings are all based on the carbon chemistry but they differ in
some aspects relevant to its remote detection. Depending on the energy source we
have photosynthetic and chemosynthetic. The presence of oxygen in the atmosphere
distinguished between anaerobic and aerobic and the level of complexity discriminated
between unicellular and multicellular. Finally, we have the question of the emergence
of intelligence and technology among one of the multicellular species. In the evolution
of our planet, life has not been a passive agent affecting the composition of the
atmosphere. From the tiny bacteria to technological civilizations we can expect to
see the life signatures in the atmosphere of exoplanets.
Earth has maintained the conditions for habitability during the last 4.000 Ma
allowing the presence of liquid water at the surface. This was possible through a
complex interplay between the solar luminosity, the geodynamics of our planet and
the atmospheric composition of the atmosphere. The theory of stellar evolution has
been tested and developed by observations of several stellar types at different times
of their evolutions. Similarly it is reasonable to expect that the future observed
population of planets would exhibit a wide range of planet types and evolutionary
stages. A copy of the Earth may be observed at any evolutionary phase. The most
dramatic change suffered by our planet affected the composition of the atmosphere.
Extraterrestrial observers would obtain different spectra of our planet depending on
the epoch of the observation. The earliest epochs would have been dominated by CO2
and water vapor, while in recent times, together such spectral features the bands of
molecular oxygen, O2 , and ozone, O3 , will also be present.
Depending of the mass of the terrestrial planet, we could have a planet without
atmosphere (Mercury-like), an Earth-like planet or, for larger masses, an ocean planet.
Another parameter to be changed during the planetary evolution is the albedo. There
are geological indications that the Earth suffered two snowball events, a time when
our planet was almost completely covered by snow and ice [3]. Moreover, if one is
interested in searching for other Earth copies at the same evolutionary stage, over the
past million years the Earth has spent approximately 90% of the time into ice ages.

2
The occurrence of ice ages is caused by a combination of orbital parameters. One can
only guess what the orbital parameters of exo-earths will be, but guided for the only
example we have one should a priori expect ice age earths. A large extent of ice will
increase the surface albedo making the signal to noise improve an allowing an easier
detection than an interglacial Earth.
Waiting to the detection of the first Earth–like planets, reliable tests need to be
developed to interpret these new data discerning, for instance, between Venus, Earth
and Mars–like planets. Later we may be able to infer whether life is common or
not in the universe by observing the evolutionary stages of millions of planets. For
monographs and reviews about this topic see [4] and [5].

2 The Earth as a member of a dynamic system

Observed from space the fundamental parameters to be determined for an exoplanet
would be those related to the geometry and global suface/atmospheric properties.
For example, the measurement of angular radius and the knowledge of the distance
to the parent star, would allow us to determine the dimensions of the planet. The
determination of the orbit around the star, the mass.
Most of the planets of the Solar System have almost circular orbits. However,
large and chaotic variations in the eccentricity of giant planets can produce severe
perturbations in the orbit of Earth-like planets affecting the habitability conditions.
We can therefore define the Dynamical Habitable Zone (DHZ) as the region where
physical conditions at the terrestrial planet’s surface remain stable during long periods
of time, and are compatible with the development of life.

2.1 Relevant parameters

The Roche limit, d, is the distance within which a celestial body held together only
by its own gravity will disintegrate due to the tidal forces of a second body, exceeding
the first’s gravitational self-attraction.
ρM 1/3
d = R(2 )
ρm
where R is the stellar radius, ρM the stellar density and ρm the planetary density. For
a fluid planet, tidal forces cause the satellite to elongate, causing it to break apart
more readily.
A Hill sphere is the gravitational sphere of influence of an astronomical body in
the face of perturbations from another heavier body around its orbit. The radius of
the Hill sphere is given by
m 1/3
RH = a( )
3M
3
where m is the mass of the smaller body, orbiting around the heavier body of mass
M at a distance a. Orbits at or just within the Hill sphere are not stable in the long
term. In the Solar System the planet with the largest Hill sphere is Neptune (0.775
AU).
The tidal forces between two objects tend to synchronize the orbital and rotational
periods in order to preserve the angular momentum of the system. For an earth-like
planet in a circular orbit this distance was estimated by [6] as:

RTL (t) = 0.027(P0 t/Q)1/6 M1/3

where P0 is the original rotation period and Q the solid plus ocean dissipation rate.
For the Earth P0 = 13.5 hours and Q = 100 [7].

2.2 The Solar System: Rule or exception?

Two thirds of the stars are members of binary or multiple stellar systems. This surely
complicates the stability of the planets encircling one of the members of the system.
We can consider two types of stable orbits for Earth-like planets around a binary
system: a) S-type with planets encircling one component of the binary system. In
fact, 19 extrasolar giant planets have been detected in such orbits [8]. b) P-type with
planets encircling both components of the binary stellar system. No exoplanet with
this orbit has yet been detected, but close binary systems are not included in the
current surveys.
Holman & Wiegert (1999) [9] have investigated the regions of the phase space,
where planets can persist for long times around stellar binary systems. They get the
best fit for the critical semi-major axis as:

ac = (1.60 ± 0.04) + (5.10 ± 0.05)e + (−2.22 ± 0.11)e2 + (4.12 ± 0.09) m

where m = m2 /(m1 + m2 )
Musielak et al. (2005) [10] simulations indicate that the stability of Jupiter-type
planets depends on both the distance ratio between the star and the planet, and
the mass ratio of the possible stellar companion(s). Lissauer et al. (2004) [11] have
studied the formation of terrestrial planets in binary star systems.
The planets of the Solar System are characterized by their almost circular orbits.
However, more than one third of the extrasolar planets detected so far have large
eccentricities (e > 0.4). But even if the extremes in stellar insolation near periastron
and apoastron are damaging to liquid-water environments, such worlds might still be
habitable (cf. [12]), if they receive a stellar flux that, when averaged over a complete
orbit, is not too different from the nearly constant flux received by the Earth from
the Sun . The time-averaged flux over an eccentric orbits is given by

4
 L
<F>=
4πa2 (1 − e2 )1/2

where L is the star’s luminosity, e is the eccentricity of the planet, and a is the
distance between the planet and the star.
If hot giant planets are present in the system, simplifying the problem to circular
and co-planar orbits we can consider three main types of stable orbits for terrestrial
planets (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Three main types of stable orbits for terrestrial planets: a) A Solar system
configuration , b) A hot giant planet orbiting close to the star and c) Terrestrial planet
orbiting a giant planet.

Stable orbits of terrestrial planets inside the DHZ exist only if the orbits of the
giant planets are located sufficiently far away from either the inner or outer edge of
the habitable zone [13].
Williams et al. (1997) [14] have studied the possibilities of habitability of moons
rotating around hot giant exoplanets placed within the habitability zone. The satellite
need to be large enough (> 0.12 Earth Masses) to retain a substantial and long-lived
atmosphere. A lower limit of 0.23 Earth masses is needed to sustain plate tectonics,
a crucial mechanism to compensate for the gradual brightening of a star as it ages.
What is questionable is the ability of the giant planets to retain their moons as they
migrate inward.
We must keep in mind that not all the planetary environments that might be
habitable are necessarily within the habitable zone. The terrestrial example shows the
existence of subterranean and suboceanic life that could have multiple counterparts
in the Universe. Europa and Titan are two good examples in the Solar System.
The circular orbit of Jupiter in our Solar System promotes the stability of circular
orbits among the other planets (excepting Pluto). With all probability, the Solar
System has kept its present configuration, because there is not enough mass in the
vicinity of the giant planets to produce gravitational interactions, giving rise to the

5
migration of the planet inwards [15]. Therefore, it is pertinent to ask whether the
Solar System is special in some way compared with the majority of planetary systems
to be found in the galaxy [16]. The answer to this fundamental question needs a more
complete observational work.
A gravitational couple on the equatorial bulge of a planet, exerted by the Sun
and the Moon in the Earth’s case, causes precession of the rotation axis, as well as
nutation, which changes the obliquity. Gravitational interactions with other planets
give rise to a similar processes. When the rates of precession of the spin axis and orbit
axis come into resonance, large and chaotic excursions in obliquity can occur. Laskar
et al. (1993) [17] showed mathematically that if Earth did not have a large moon, and
if it was spinning at the same rate as it is now, its obliquity would vary chaotically.
Simulations by Ortega et al. (2005) [18] indicate that an earth–like planet with high
obliquities should lead to a darker surface.

3 The energy balance of the atmosphere

The Sun’s energy is the main driver of the Earth’s climate system. However, not all
of the sunlight reaching the Earth is used, some of it is reflected back to space by
the earth’s atmosphere (clouds and aerosols) and surface (Figure 2). The albedo of a
planet is a unit-less quantity defined as the ratio between the amount of energy that
the planet receives from its parent star (sunlight in the case of the earth) and the
amount of this sunlight that is reflected back to space.
The energy that is not reflected back to space is absorbed by the land and oceans,
and it is then re-emitted in the form of heat (infrared radiation). If the planet had
no atmosphere, this heat would all escape to space, but in the earth’s case some of
it is trapped by the atmospheric gases, increasing the planet’s surface temperatures
(Figure 2). The mechanism is known as the Greenhouse effect, a naturally occurring
heating process resulting from the fact that certain atmospheric gases, such as water
vapor, carbon dioxide, and methane are able to absorb longwave radiation. The
present enjoyable 15 ◦ C average global temperature of the Earth, would turn to -18
◦
C without the effect of greenhouse gases.

3.1 The balance equation

The temperature of a planetary surface results from the balance between the incident
energy and that emitted by the surface and atmosphere. Considering the planet in
radiative equilibrium (i.e. power in equals power out), we have that the planet’s
surface temperature, Ts , is

Ts = S/4σ(1 − g)(1 − A) T4

6
where S is the solar constant, A is the Bond albedo, σ is the Stephen-Boltzmann
constant and g is the normalized greenhouse effect of the Earth’s atmosphere [19].
This means that the Bond albedo, together with the parent’s star irradiance and the
greenhouse effect, directly control the planet temperature.

Figure 2: The main components of the Earth’s climate system

3.2 Rotational Modulation in albedo

There are big differences between spatially resolved or unresolved measurements of
a planet. For example, remote sensing satellites on earth’s orbit can determine veg-
etation leaf indices, plankton blooms, saharan storms and city lights, but all these
features disappear in the noise when global averages are taken. For an extrasolar
planet observation, at least for the few next decades, any photometric or spectro-
scopic observations will be globally integrated measurements.
The albedo is a very variable property. At local scales, the albedo depends on
the surface type (ocean, desert, ice,..), the given meteorology for the day (amount of
clouds and aerosols) and the solar zenith angle - or time of the day - (the albedo is
a bi-directional property). If we were to observe the Earth from far away without
geographical resolution, at planetary scales, the sunlit half of the earth’s for example,
the albedo becomes less variable.
Still the global albedo varies because of the north-south asymmetry of the con-
tinental land distribution, the seasonal changes in the extent of snow and ice cover,
and the seasonal changes in meteorological parameters, more specifically the clouds.
This changes are indicative, as all seasons are, of a non-zero planet obliquity, i.e.,
solar heating angle is what determines the cloud and weather patterns.

7
 There is one methodology to obtain globally-integrated measurements of the sun-
light reflected by Earth. Observations of the earthshine, the ghostly glow on the dark
side of the Moon, provide direct estimates of the Earth’s albedo. The brightness
ratio between the bright crescent of the Moon and that of the dark side is propor-
tional to the earths’s albedo, although several geometric factors need to be accounted
for [20] [21]. From earthshine observations, it has been determined that for the Earth,
the photometric variability in the visible range is around 15-20% at diurnal and sea-
sonal time scales.
Thus, because of its particular continental distribution and cloud amount, from
photometric observations of the Earth it would be straight forward to determine its
rotational period (the length of an earthy day). Models indicate that integration over
3-5 days would be enough to determine that length within minutes. However that
might not be so easy for other extrasolar planets. If the planet has no strong surface
features, as is the case for Mercury or Mars, or it is completely covered by clouds, as
is the case for Venus and the giant planets, determining the rotational period may be
an impossible task. In fact, Earth may well be the only one of the major planets for
which a rotational period can be easily established from a distance of several AU.
Thus, the requirements for photometric determination of the rotational period
seem to be a total or partial view of an inhomogeneous surface, with relatively large
contrasts such as oceans and land, or large-scale structures in the atmosphere whose
mean lifetime is of the order of the planet’s rotational period or larger. In the later
case, the rotational period can be established for the top of the atmosphere but not
for the planet’s surface.
The albedo of a given planet may also change in time. For example 2300 and
some 700-800 million years ago, the Earth underwent an epoch of extreme glacial
temperatures know as the ‘Snowball Earth’ events. At theses times, the extent of
the sea ice is believed to have reached as far as the tropics. Because of the high
albedo of ice, the averaged albedo of the Earth must have been much larger than the
present’s day 0.3 value. In Figure 3 we have simulated an extreme snow-ball earth,
with the planet completely covered in ice, with the present day cloud amount and
distribution and without any clouds (such cool temperatures could produce a much
drier atmosphere and lower cloud amounts). If the extreme snowball Earth is free of
clouds, we obtain an albedo of about 0.7 (close to that of Venus). If clouds are present,
the albedo decreases to 0.5-0.55. For a completely overcast Earth we would have an
albedo of 0.5. Thus, based on the albedo value it would be possible to distinguish a
snowball Earth from an overcast earth. Note however that this holds true only for a
planet with very similar atmospheric properties to Earth. If the chemical composition
of the atmosphere or clouds is different these quantities will vary. For example the
albedo of Venus, with a CO2 atmosphere overcast with thick clouds of concentrated
sulphuric acid, has an albedo of 0.77 that could be confused with a snowball Earth if
only photometry observations were available.

8
Figure 3: Mean hourly Bond albedo simulations for the Earth during the first 15
days of June 2000. The different linestyles indicate several possible states of the
Earth’s atmosphere and surface. The thick solid line represents the real Earth albedo
using real-time cloud cover and land surface. “No Clouds”: A cloudless Earth with
the real surface properties. “Overcast”: a completely overcast (with water clouds)
planet Earth. “Snowball” : a snowball Earth (all ground is frozen ice or snow) but
covered with the real cloud amount.“Snowball Nocl”: a cloudless planet Earth during
a glaciation. “Varying %cl”: real planet Earth albedo but changing the mean cloud
amount at each point of the Earth by -10, +10 and +20 % from bottom to top
respectively.

Ford et al.(2003) [22] presented light curves for an unresolved Earth and for pos-
sible earth-like planets simulated by changing the surface features.

4 Problems for the detection of Earth-like planets

4.1 Brightness ratio
A planet orbiting around a star emitting a flux F∗ acquires by reflection a brightness
given by Frfl . The ratio of both fluxes is given by (see [23])

Frf l Apl Rpl 2

= ( ) φ(t)
F∗ 4 a

9
where Apl is the planetary albedo, a is the distance between the planet and the star,
Rpl is the radius of the planet, and φ(t) is the orbital phase factor given by

2πt
φ(t) = 1 − sin i sin( )
P
where i is the inclination of the planetary orbit with respect to the sky plane and P
the period of the planet around the star.
On the other hand, the ratio between the thermal flux of the planet (centered in
the IR range) and the stellar flux is given by the expression

Fth Rpl 2
=
F∗ 2a
Figure 4 shows the ratio of fluxes where we can see the advantage of observing in
the infrared owing to the better contrast (1 part in 106 ) with respect to the visible (1
part in 109 )

Figure 4: Flux of a solar-type star (upper solid line) at 5 pc, and the planetary flux
(lower lines) of a Jupiter-like planet at 5.2 AU from the star, with and age of 0.125
(solid-line), 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 (dot-dash-dash line) Gyrs. Adapted from
Fig. 2 of Stam et al. (2004) [24].

Here, we will briefly consider the limitations of the present-day techniques for the
detection of Earth–like planets.

10
4.2 Astrometry
The astrometric signal, θ, of a planet with mass mpl , orbiting a star with mass m∗ at
a distance d in a circular orbit of radius a is given by
mpl m∗ −2/3 P 2/3 d −1
θ=3 ( ) ( ) ( )
mE mSun yr pc
where θ is expressed in microarcseconds. To detect an Earth-like planet orbiting a
solar-like star with a period of 1 year and observed at 5 pc of distance we would
need a resolution of 0.6 µas, far beyond the present capabilities. Sozzetti (2005) [25]
describes past and present efforts using this technique. The future Space Interfer-
ometry Mission (SIM) will achieve a precision of 1 µas, enough to detect Jupiter-like
planets [26].

4.3 Radial velocity

This technique is based on the periodic variation of the star’s radial velocity, ∆V,
induced by the presence of a planet. From the application of Kepler’s laws we have
(mpl sin i)3 P
= ∆V 3 (1 − e2 )3/2
(m∗ + mpl ) 2πG
and if mpl ≪ m∗ we have
P 1/3
mpl sin i = ( ) ∆V(1 − e2 ) m2/3
2πG ∗

expressing the planetary mass in Jupiter masses, ∆V in m/s, and the period P in
years, we have:

mpl sin(i) = 3.5 × 10−2 ∆V.P

For an Earth–like planet (mpl ∼ 0.01MJ ) orbiting a solar–like star with a period
of 1 year, we need a resolution in velocity lower than 1 m/s, again this is far beyond
the present-day capabilities. Moreover, a better understanding of intrinsic stellar
variations is needed.

4.4 Transits
For a transit of a planet across the stellar disk to be observable, the planet must be
aligned with the star as seen from Earth with an inclination i > θT , where θT =
cos−1 [(R∗ + Rp )/D], being the distance planet-star. Ehrenreich et al. (2005) [27]
simulated the transit of different Earth-like planets across G,F and K stars. Several
planets, all far larger than the Earth, have already been detected using this technique.

11
4.5 Microlensing events
The gravitational microlensing effect occurs when the gravitational field of a planet
and its parent star act to magnify the light of a distant background star. For the
effect to work the planet and star must pass almost directly between the observer and
the distant star. The key advantage of this technique is that it allows low mass (i.e.
Earth-like) planets to be detected using available technology (see [28]). A notable
disadvantage is that the lensing cannot be repeated because the chance alignment
never occurs again. Also, the detected planets will tend to be several kiloparsecs
away, and follow-up observations would not be possible.

5 The Earth Spectrum

5.1 Visible
The Earth spectrum in the visible is dominated by the Rayleigh scattering combined
with the effect of diffuse reflection of the earth’s surface and the clouds. In Figure 5 the
reflection spectra of the different bodies of the Solar System are shown for comparison.
These measurements allow us to distinguish the main characteristics and composition
of their atmospheres, and to derive estimates of the amounts of each atmospheric
component for the averaged atmospheric depth. For well mixed gases, we can get
their mixing ratios independently of the fact that we are not able to sample down
to the planet’s surface. For non-well-mixed gases we get a relative idea of their
abundances, which can be improved with models if other variables such as mass,
radius and temperature profile are know.
The overall shape of the earth’s spectrum in the visible region shows interesting
and peculiar signatures. The most prominent is the Rayleigh scattering, the cause of
the blue color of our sky and the main source of opacity in the Earth’s atmosphere,
which shows an enhancement towards the blue part of the spectra (Figure 5). Except
Neptune, no other solar system body shows this strong Rayleigh feature, and in
the case of an extrasolar planet detection, it would be relatively easy to distinguish
between a Neptune-like or Earth-like planet. At short wavelengths (< 310 nm) ozone
absorption and UV absorption due to upper hazes (giant planets) dominates over the
Rayleigh scattering.

5.2 UV and X-rays

At shorter wavelengths, UV and X-rays are strongly absorbed by the Earth’s atmo-
sphere, and we see broad absorption bands of oxygen and ozone producing a decrease
in the reflected spectra intensity. Therefore images in these bands give only infor-
mation about processes taking place in the upper atmospheric layers. This spectral

12
Figure 5: Spectral albedo for different planets of the Solar System and the Moon.
Source: Traub et al. (2003) [29]

range is superimposed by different atomic and molecular lines that constitutes the
airglow. As an example, we see the Earth glowing from space in the light of Lyman-
alpha (Figure 6). The layer where this light is coming from is called the geocorona:
a cloud of neutral hydrogen atoms that surrounds the Earth.

5.3 Infrared
The thermal emission of the Earth dominates the IR spectrum (see Figure 4). As
corresponding to its effective temperature of 288 K, the IR brightness peaks around 10
µ and then decays slowly. It is superposed by different molecular bands corresponding
to the most important atmospheric components (Figure 7). This range is the primary
to study the atmospheric composition of the atmosphere of exoplanets.

5.4 Microwaves
Most planetary bodies are cooler than a few hundred degrees and emit very short
radio waves (microwaves). The amount of microwave energy emitted by a planet is a

13
Figure 6: The Earth’s geocorona as viewed from the surface of Moon. Image acquired
during the Apollo 16 mission (April 1972) with the Naval Research Laboratory’s far–
ultraviolet camera/spectrograph. The Sun is to the left and the Earth’s North Pole
is towards the upper left. Source: Carruthers et al. (1976) [30]

measure of its temperature 1 . Microwaves are very powerful tools for remote sensing
of the earth. Some ranges of frequencies are attenuated strongly by vegetation and
atmospheric water, while others have considerable power to penetrate even clouds
and thick jungle canopies.

6 Polarimetry
The study of the polarization of a stellar-planet system is a very promising method for
extrasolar planet characterization. Using polarization, one can produce an occultation
of the starlight, allowing a clear detection of the surrounding planet(s). Moreover,
the degree of polarization, P , provides information about the planet’s composition.
P is determined by
Ir − Il
P=
Ir + Il
1
Non-thermal emission (e.g. synchroton processes) can also contribute to the microwave emission.

14
Figure 7: Infrared Spectrum of the Earth taken by the experiment VIRTIS onboard
Rosetta during the March 2005 fly–by. Courtesy: ESA.

where Il and Ir are the intensities polarized parallel and perpendicular to the plane
containing the center of the star and the exoplanet.
Figure 8 shows the relevant geometry of the observations. The stellar light scat-
tered by the exoplanet is linearly polarized. In the case of an unresolved system the
observed polarization signal will be about 10−5 .
The flux and state of polarization of the planetary radiation can be described by
a Stokes vector F (see [24])

F = [F(λ, α), Q(λ, α), U(λ, α), V(λ, α)]

with α being the phase angle between the star and the observer as seen from the
center of the planet (see Fig. 8). Here, Q and U describe the linearly polarized flux
and V the circularly polarized flux. Now, assuming that the light of a solar–like star
is not globally polarized (V=0) and adopting an adequate geometry (U=0), we have
that
Q(λ, α) Qrefl (λ, α)
P(λ, α) = =
F(λ, α) Frefl(λ,α) + Fther (λ, α)

This way, polarimetric measurements improve the contrast exoplanet/star. Nu-

merical simulations of polarization spectra of giant extrasolar planets have been made
by Seager et al. (2000) [31] and Stam et al.(2004) [24]. Carciofi & Magalhães (2005)
[32] and Selway et al. (2005) [33] studied the polarization signatures in planetary

15
Figure 8: Distances and angles involved in observing an extrasolar planet. Adapted
from Stam et al.(2004) [24]

transits and microlensing events, respectively. For information about the current in-
strumental projects aiming to get precisions of 10−7 given enough photons, see [34]
and [35].
As with other techniques, global polarimetric observations of our planet will be
the guideline. The POLDER experiment has measured polarization reflectances of
the Earth from the ADEOS satellite [36].

7 Biosignatures and the search for life

Since Earth is the only known planet able to sustain life at a global scale, first efforts of
determining the presence of life in other planets were based on biological experiments
dependent on common features of life on Earth. We can divide the living organisms on
Earth, and perhaps in some extrasolar planets, in three complexity levels: unicellular
life, complex life and intelligent life.

7.1 Unicellular life

Methanogens, the more simple chemosynthetic bacteria, were probably the first organ-
isms that appeared on Earth. They are responsible of the initial rise of atmospheric
methane that also increased the temperature of the planet, warmed then by a fainter
sun, and contributed to the development of more complex bacteria. These simple uni-
cellular organisms are being searched in other planets in the solar system and have

16
also been grown on a simulation of Martian soil in laboratory [37]. Three independent
teams have recently detected methane in located equatorial regions of the Martian
atmosphere [38][39][40]. Although this unexpected methane concentrations may turn
out to have a geological origin [41], a living source remains as a plausible hypothesis.
Another proposed candidate for habitability in the solar system is Saturn’s satellite,
Titan. On the contrary of all other solar system satellites Titan has an atmosphere,
and many similarities to the abiotic (pre-life) earth’s reducing atmosphere, which was
composed of CH4 , N2 , NH3 , H2 , and H2 O [42]. Titan’s atmosphere is a natural
laboratory for organic chemistry. However, the satellite is extremely cold, doesn’t
have liquid water and has very little sunlight, three conditions considered essential
for life. Present earth’s biosphere is basically formed by organic matter generated,
through photosynthesis, from carbon dioxide and water, with the input of solar en-
ergy. Early photosynthetic bacteria, such as cyanobacteria (blue algae), are believed
to be responsible for the initial rise of oxygen in Earth 2,300 million years ago [43].
If we compare Earth’s present atmosphere with that of an abiotic Earth we con-
clude that the biosphere is continuously regenerating gasses, which are in thermo-
dynamic disequilibrium with the geochemistry of the rest of the planet. Therefore,
any by-product of biological processes in non-chemical balance with other species
in the atmosphere (as suggested by [44],[45] and [46]), constitutes an atmospheric
biomarker. They are indirect consequence of biological activity and have been recently
summarized in Table 2 of Gaidos and Selsis (2006) [47].

7.2 Complex Life

Complex life is constituted by highly specialized systems of cells, some of them capa-
ble of carrying out complicated functions. Photosynthesis of multicellular organisms
is closely linked to several harvest molecules, being chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) the domi-
nant on Earth. Chl-a behaves like an antenna, serving plants to collect solar energy.
All healthy vegetation is chemically similar and shows green and infrared reflectance
enhancement. The spectral inflexion point or red edge of the enhancement has been
used to describe the variation in leaf and canopy chlorophyll concentration, since
it may change depending on plant health conditions, specie and incident light. At
Earth, vegetation may extend over large areas of the planetary surface allowing the
direct detection of its pigments spectral signal from space. The detection of this
signal represents an unquestionable indication of habitation. This red edge has been
detected when observing a rather clear-sky green Earth’s region with spatial resolu-
tion from the space [48], although its detection in globally integrated observations is
controversial [49][50].

17
7.3 Intelligent life
At radio wavelength, the signals of our television and radio sets dominate the elec-
tromagnetic spectra of the Earth and are larger than the natural emissions from the
Earth or the Sun. This gives this region of the spectra a very strong potential for
the detection of such artificial signals in exoplanets. The SETI project is dedicated
to this mission of listening to the stars.
Traditionally, this is considered the best range of the electromagnetic spectrum to
search for and detect ‘artificial’ signatures emitted by an intelligent civilization. That
might be an anthropogenic prejudice due to the fact that humans have chosen this
specific technology for telecommunication processes, but there are certain advantages
to the use of radio waves for interstellar communications, if such are ever to occur.
For example there is almost nothing in outer space able to block or absorb radio
frequencies, and it is easy to pin point the origin of such waves with accuracy. It is
also quite easy to encrypt information within.
Rotational modulation of the radio emission of a Earth-like exoplanet will inform
about the spatial distribution of the emitters and additionally about the distribution
of the continents [51].

8 Conclusions
Although we are probably set for some surprises, the example of the Earth and the
rest of the rocky planets of the solar system will be our guidance to classify and under-
stand the multiplicity of planetary systems that might exist in our galaxy. However,
the earth–extrasolar planets connection will work in both directions. When a sub-
stantial database of exoplanets becomes available, statistics of planetary formation
and evolution will become possible. This will provide vital information in solving
some of the questions about the formation and evolution of our own planet and the
solar system, for which we still have no answers.
The current view on stellar evolution is very deterministic. The future and evo-
lution of a star will depend on two basic properties, its mass and its metalicity. If
these two quantities are know we can establish whether the star will go nova in a few
million years or will end its days as a red giant. One of the few things that could
change this deterministic ‘future’ of the star is the influence of companion stars.
For planets, the picture is a little more complicated. At first instance the mass of
the planet, its composition, and the distance from the parent star will determine its
habitability and evolution. But other factors can play a major role in its evolution.
So, while to establish the solar-stellar connection we needed only to compare the stars,
to establish the earth-exoplanets parallelism we will need to compare the planets but
also the physical properties and evolution of their planetary systems as a whole.
Undoubtedly, one of the main concerns will be the search for life. If a planet has all

18
the suitable original conditions to develop and sustain life, does life necessarily occur?
And if it does, what are the average time scales for the development of bacteria, plants
or intelligence?
We may also be able to determine how many of the ‘rocky’ planets that we de-
tect have experienced a runaway greenhouse effect such as Venus, or how many have
lost their atmosphere as Mars. What are the orbital and chance factors determining
this planetary evolution? It would also be interesting to find out what is the role
of meteorites, planet rotation and magnetic field, plate tectonics, etc. have on the
development of planetary evolution, and ultimately on the habitability and life evo-
lution on a wide range of planets. Ultimately we might even be able to answer the
most important of these questions: are we alone?

References
[1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), The Scientific Basis , J.T.
Houghton, Y. Dong, M. Noguer, eds. (Cambridge University Press, 2001).

[2] Schrijver, C. J., Zwaan,C. 2000, Solar and Stellar Magnetic Activity, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

[3] Hoffman, P. F., Kaufman, A. J., Halverson,G. P., Schrag,D. P. 1998, Science,
281, 1342

[4] Des Marais, D. J., et al. 2003, Astrobiology, 3, 219

[5] Kasting, J. F., Catling, D. 2003, Ann. Review Astron. Astrophys. 41, 429

[6] Peale, S. J. 1977, IAU Colloq. 28: Planetary Satellites, 87

[7] Burns, J. A. 1986, IAU Colloq. 77: Some Background about Satellites, 117

[8] Eggenberger, A., Udry, S., Mayor, M. 2004, A&A , 417, 353

[9] Holman, M. J., Wiegert, P. A. 1999, Astronomical Journal, 117, 621

[10] Musielak, Z. E., Cuntz, M., Marshall, E. A., Stuit, T. D. 2005, A&A , 434, 355

[11] Lissauer, J. J., Quintana, E. V., Chambers, J. E., Duncan, M. J., Adams, F. C.
2004, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 22, 99

[12] Williams, D. M., Pollard, D. 2002, ASP Conf. Ser. 269: The Evolving Sun and
its Influence on Planetary Environments, 201

[13] Noble, M., Musielak, Z. E., Cuntz, M. 2002, Astrophys. J. , 572, 1024

19
[14] Williams, D. M., Kasting, J. F., & Wade, R. A. 1997a, Nature, 385, 234

[15] Thommes, E. W., Lissauer, J. 2005, Proc. STCI: Astrophysics of Life, Cambridge
University Press, 41

[16] Beer, M. E., King, A. R., Livio, M., Pringle, J. E. 2004, M.N.R.A.S. , 354, 763

[17] Laskar, J., Joutel, F., Robutel, P., 1993, Nature 361, 615

[18] Ortega, J. A., Shukla, S. P., Seager, S., 2005, American Astronomical Society
Meeting Abstracts, 207

[19] Raval, A., Ramanathan, V. 1989, Nature, 342, 758

[20] Qiu, J., Goode,P.R., Pallé, E., Yurchyshin, V., Hickey,J., Montañés Rodrı́guez,
P., Chu, M.C., Kolbe, E., Brown,C.T., Koonin, S.E. 2003, Journal of Geophysical
Research (Atmospheres), 108, D22, 4709

[21] Pallé, E., Goode,P.R., Yurchyshin, V., Qiu, J., Hickey,J., Montañés Rodrı́guez,
P., Chu, M.C., Kolbe,E., Brown,C.T., Koonin, S.E. 2003, Journal of Geophysical
Research (Atmospheres), 108, D22, 4710

[22] Ford, E. B., Seager, S., Turner, E. L. 2003, ASP Conf. Ser. 294: Scientific
Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, 294, 639

[23] Schneider, J. 2002, Proc. I European Workshop on Exo-Astrobiology: ESA SP-

518, 409

[24] Stam, D. M., Hovenier, J. W., Waters, L. B. F. M. 2004, A&A , 428, 663

[25] Sozzetti, A. 2005, Publications Astronomical Society Pacific, 117, 1021

[26] Takeuchi, T., Velusamy, T., Lin, D. N. C. 2005, Astrophys. J. , 618, 987

[27] Ehrenreich, D., Tinetti, G., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A., &
Selsis, F. 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0510215

[28] Beaulieu, J. P. et al. 2006, Nature, 439, 437

[29] Traub, W. A. 2003, ASP Conf. Ser. 294: Scientific Frontiers in Research on
Extrasolar Planets, 294, 595

[30] Carruthers, G. R., Page, T., Meier, R. R. 1976, Journal Geophysical Research,
81, 1664

[31] Seager, S., Whitney, B. A., Sasselov, D. D. 2000, Astrophys. J. , 540, 504

20
[32] Carciofi, A. C., Magalhães, A. M. 2005, Astrophys. J. , 635, 570

[33] Selway, K. L., Hendry, M. A., Lucas, P. W. 2005, Protostars and Planets V,
Proceedings of the Conference held October 24-28, in Hawai’i. LPI Contribution
No. 1286., p.8352.

[34] Gisler, D., et al. 2004, Proceedings SPIE, 5492, 463

[35] Lucas, P. W., Hough, J. H., Bailey, J. A. 2005, Protostars and Planets V,
Proceedings of the Conference held October 24-28, Hawai’i. LPI Contribution
No. 1286., p.8480.

[36] Sridhar Anjum, V.N., Ghosh, R. 2004, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21, 805

[37] Kral, T. A., Bekkum, C. R., & McKay, C. P. 2004, Origins of Life and Evolution
of the Biosphere, 34, 615

[38] Krasnopolsky, V. A., Maillard, J. P., Owen, T. C. 2004, Icarus, 172, 537

[39] Formisano, V., Atreya, S., Encrenaz, T., Ignatiev, N., Giuranna, M. 2004, Sci-
ence, 306, 1758

[40] Mumma, M. J., Novak, R. E., Hewagama, T., Villanueva, G. L., Bonev, B. P.,
DiSanti, M. A., Smith, M. D., Dello Russo, N. 2005, AAS/Division for Planetary
Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 37.

[41] Lyons, J. R., Manning, C., Nimmo, F. 2005, Geophysical Research Letters, 32,
13201

[42] Schaefer, L., Fegley, B. 2005, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Ab-
stracts, 37

[43] Walker, J. C. G. 1977, Evolution of the Atmosphere, New York: Macmillan.

[44] Lovelock, J.E., 1965, Nature 207, 568

[45] Lovelock, J.E., 1975, Proc. Roy. Soc. London 189, 167

[46] Hitchcock, Lovelock, J.E., 1967, Icarus 7, 149

[47] Gaidos, E., Selsis, F. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0602008

[48] Sagan, C., Thompson, W. R., Carlson, R., Gurnett, D., Hord, C. 1993, Nature,
365, 715

[49] Woolf, N. J., Smith, P. S., Traub, W. A., Jucks, K. W. 2002, Astrophysical
Journal, 574, 430

21
[50] Montañés-Rodriguez, P., Pallé, E., Goode, P. R., Hickey, J., & Koonin, S. E.
2005, Astrophysical Journal, 629, 1175

[51] Sullivan, W.T., Brown, S., Wetherill,C, Bahcall,J.N., 1978, Science, 199, 377

22