Dacer, Icy JD-2A (Labor Relations) - Serious Misconduct

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

LABOR RELATIONS

ICY DACER JD-2A

G.R. NO. 213009


BOOKMEDIA PRESS, INC. & BRIZUELA VS. SINAJON & ABENIR
JULY 17, 2019

FACTS:

Bookmedia hired Sinajon and Abenir as in-house security personnel. They were tasked in securing
the safety and well-being of Brizuela , and also for monitoring the actuations and conditions of certain
contractual workers within Bookmedia’s plant while Brizuela is not around.
On July 20, 1997, Brizuela received a report from Larry Valdoz (security guard) that Sinajon and
Abenir left the company premises moments after punching-in their respective time cards. The report also
alleges that Sinajon returned on the evening of the same day and punched-out his and Abenir’s time cards.
In their letter-explanations on the next day, they admitted to punching-in their time cards and then
leaving work early due to some emergency in their respective homes. On the 22 nd of July, they were both
fired. Now, they filed a complaint before the Labor Arbiter for illegal dismissal.
The LA rendered the dismissal illegal. On appeal to the NLRC, the decision was affirmed. In the CA,
the decision was still affirmed. Hence, this case now in the SC.

ISSUE:

WON the actions of Sinajon and Abenir constituted just causes for their dismissal.

RULING:

It was held that the actions of the respondents do not qualify as just causes for dismissal. Such
actions cannot be considered as serious misconduct, willful disobedience of an employer’s lawful order, or
fraud.

In Ha Yuan Restaurant v. NLRC, the just cause of serious misconduct is defined as the transgression
of some established and definite rule of action, a forbidden act, a dereliction of duty, willful in character, and
implies wrongful intent and not mere error of judgment.

In Gold City Integrated Port Sevices,Inc. v. NLRC, willful disobedience of an employer’s lawful
order as a just cause for dismissal, envisages the concurrence of at least two requisites: (1) the employee’s
assailed conduct must have been willful or intentional, the willfulness being characterized by a wrongful or
perverse attitude, and the order violated must have been reasonable , lawful, made known to the employee
and must pertain to the duties which he had been engaged to discharge.

In National Power Corp. v Olandesca, fraud or dishonesty is defined as the disposition to lie, cheat,
deceive, or defraud; untrustworthiness; lack of integrity; lack of honesty, probity or integrity in principle;
lack of fairness and straightforwardness; disposition to defraud, deceive or betray.

The actions of the respondents lack the elements of willfulness or seriousness so as to warrant their
dismissal. There was no evidence proving so. Moreover, the penalty imposed must be commensurate to the
depravity of the malfeasance, violation or crime being punished. A grave injustice is committed in the name
of justice when the penalty imposed is grossly disproportionate to the wrong committed.

Considering the fact that it is the first and only time that respondents had committed any infraction
against Bookmedia, respondents is deemed to have been illegally dismissed. In lieu of reinstatement, they
were granted separation pay and backwages due to strained relations.

You might also like